Perhaps Stirner was not anti-ideology, but rather anti-"fixed" ideology. Fixing an idea or concept (whether that of religion/spirit, humanism/state or even the "I'/ego), is what turns it into a spook. I don't know, I've just started seriously reading Stirner, and that's what I've personally gotten from him so far.
I would be careful about lumping stirner in with market ideology as a lot of neo classical ideologues tend to do, the market is in essence something that would be one of those alienated material phenomena that enslave the individual.
People like Renzo Novatore and Bob Black were better then others at taking stirner to the next level
I agree with the critique that people like Feuerbach (and Marx) imported Christian ideas into a secular conctext, and in this sense didn't go far enough. What I'm skeptical of is Stirner's epistemology as an alternative to anything.
Perhaps Stirner was not anti-ideology, but rather anti-"fixed" ideology. Fixing an idea or concept (whether that of religion/spirit, humanism/state or even the "I'/ego), is what turns it into a spook. I don't know, I've just started seriously reading Stirner, and that's what I've personally gotten from him so far.
MySocksSmell2 11 months ago
I would be careful about lumping stirner in with market ideology as a lot of neo classical ideologues tend to do, the market is in essence something that would be one of those alienated material phenomena that enslave the individual.
People like Renzo Novatore and Bob Black were better then others at taking stirner to the next level
Vice81 1 year ago
I agree with the critique that people like Feuerbach (and Marx) imported Christian ideas into a secular conctext, and in this sense didn't go far enough. What I'm skeptical of is Stirner's epistemology as an alternative to anything.
brainpolice2 1 year ago