I'm sorry, although i didn't have a great understanding. I've grasped the theory of evolution and the principles of natural and artificial selection since i was about 10. Why are these people less intelligent than I was at 10?
Plant kind , animal kind ,humankind . They are kinds that stay the same . Fish never turn into elephants. Plants never turn into humans . A rose is only ever going to be a rose . Plus in its rose kind ..there are limits
@lesleyjaneuk Yes, we know none of those things happen. What is your argument? Evolution has never said that a fish will turn into an elephant or plant will turn into a human. You're comment is made due to a complete ignorance of the theory of evolution. If you're going to comment on Potholer54's videos, might I suggest you actually watch them first?
@lesleyjaneuk Yes, that's right! Show those stupid evilutionists how stupid they are! Why can't they be smart enough to see that obviously man evolved from dirt, and women evolved from a man's rib, and that everything else evolved instantly from nothingness? What are they gonna say next? That light comes from the sun? LOL! Nonsense! Read a bible people! Light existed before the sun. Duh!
Evo s are never consistent in their theory ....one minute it's survival of he fittest ...but now I detect comments are evolving to being loving . Why not give in and admit there is a designer behind it all . God made us and not we ourselves Ps 100 vs 3
@lesleyjaneuk I'm glad you brought this up. The misconception comes from two things:
1. Most people who believe in evolution don't have a degree in biology so they're not very good at explaining it.
2. "Survival of the fittest" is often confused with "survival of the strongest." Being fit simply means being more likely to reproduce. So in the case of humans and other herd animals, the ability to get along and work together is part of our survival.
Science doesn't know the answer to the common cold,cancer and man is faced with man ruining this earth. Ooooh so glad I don't put trust in science. I would rather put my trust in the top scientist ,the creator of all the clever design . Soon this earth will be how he meant it to be a paradise psalms 37vs10,11,29. No war,sickness,death. Revelation 21vs3,4 now that's what I put my trust in
@lesleyjaneuk So you don't trust science because it doesn't have an answer to everything, but you would rather trust the "top scientist" (god) who has not given any answers to anything. Nor do you not trust science because you believe man is destroying the earth, but you trust God who said that he is going to destroy the Earth?
Science only ever discovers what's already been designed . 1,000s years ago washing hands,don't touch dead bodies ,bury excrement to stop disease was recorded by Moses. Then Isaiah 40 vs 22 earth is a circle job 26vs7 this impressed me as scientists didn't know his until they discovered it thousands of years later . But the holy writings did. Who told Moses?
@lesleyjaneuk Oh dear, where do I begin? The fact that ancient people did or did not do what you describe does NOT show that they were privy to some sort of scientific knowledge that science itself didn't discover until years later. It doesn't take a genius (even in ancient times) to see that dead bodies decay, human excrement smells bad (so bury it) or if your hands are filthy, to rinse them off before eating. What they didn't know was what exactly would cause sickness i.e "Germ Theory."
@lesleyjaneuk To imply that ancient people were somehow knowledgeable about germ theory is beyond ridiculous. As I said before, none of what you describe shows "scientific" knowledge. Many of those things were common sense based on easily observed outcomes (play with poop and you'll get sick just like that nice Jones boy) even animals instinctively know this (ever own a cat?)
I met a man collecting for charity and he believed in evo. So I said well I thought it was survival of the fittest so where does love,kindness ,care,come into it? He couldn't answer it.
@lesleyjaneuk He couldn't answer it (if your story is true, which I doubt it is btw) because evolution has nothing to do with love, kindness and care. Also, your implied definition of the term "survival of the fittest" is completely ignorant as it pertains to evolution, hence the moronic question you supposedly posed to the man collecting for charity.
@lesleyjaneuk =where does love,kindness ,care,come into it? He couldn't answer it.= Probably because the poor guy wasn't an evolutionary biologist, he was just collecting for charity. If you want to know where human altruism comes from, ask someone who's studied it. Take a look at my video 'Atheists are immoral - debunked' on the Potholer54debunks channel.
@lesleyjaneuk Love, kindness, care, morals, and all the rest of it, are all normal natural human values. As humans, we don't do well alone, we instead rely on being part of a pack. When we show ourselves in crowds, we don't expect to get attacked, we expect to take place in a community. We're community oriented.
We naturally look out and are interested in the well-being of others. Not that we would automatically give, but we're interested how others do.
To start, I am a fan and subscriber of Amena's. Since I've listened to what she had to say for quite some time, I was initially on her side. This was before I saw this video. I agree with Potholer54's viewpoint that he should have the chance to respond to things that are made public on youtube. While I respect Amena, she was clearly incorrect about evolution. This video shouldn't have been removed. Instead, people should be encouraged to see it so they can get Potholer's side of the story.
I think women are definitely more modest on average... at least until they are more certain. I have no clue why that is, nor can I confirm it, but we definitely have some strong representatives of atheist females even here on Youtube, which is very refreshing.
Hmm, just got the chance to actually see this for the first time now that it's back up. Honestly, I don't see why people were getting so worked up. It's no different than any of your other Golden Crocoduck videos. On a lighter note, does anyone know the name of the song during the salute?
It's annoying how the Amena spaz overshadowed my favorite part of this video- the actual "Salute" part at 7:18 which is arguably far more groundbreaking than just dealing with Amena's misrepresentations specifically- and a lot more fun. I don't think I've seen anyone else compliment that section but I definitely found it a well-timed and organized. I love the little inclusion of Dawkins saying, "Oh really...?" hehehe The only thing I wonder at are the black and white photos- i.e., who they are
I asked a creationist "what is it about evolution that is so hard to accept?" She answered, " We are not descendants of monkeys. That's like calling my grandfather a monkey. I find that offensive."
So perhaps creations are really egomaniacs, whose self-worth is tied into the belief that their god made them. And this makes them special in some way.
@jrvenice1999 Then I would say to the creationist. "As a human I'm related to you, a being so ignorant and refusing to learn anything new, or perhaps not even able to learn the simplest thing. And I find that offensive. I'd rather be related to a monkey, preferrably a clever and curious monkey." They simply refuse to realize that they are less than a fart compared to the infinite wonder of the universe. And sure, I guess some may find comfort in it, but I find the wonder, amazing.
Thrilled to death your videos were reinstated, I didn't get to see them before they were taken down. Congratulations & please keep up the excellent work my friend..
@DaToNyOyO The greatest irony of all is that these religious nuts (Like banana man Ray Comfort and Crocoduck boy) will the spell the death of religion.
Your sense of humor and comical timing never fail to make me laugh out loud. It is balm for my heart to hear science defended so refreshingly against people that have been indoctrinated with religion and that never dared to challenge what they have been spoonfed mindlessly by others.
If you choose not to have children, does that mean you are "unfit", by definition? Does that mean your rational brain has gotten in the way of a natural process that directly links you to the first living creature on Earth? Or is it that sort of thinking that will actually allow our survival as a species (not my genes, directly - but those of my sisters or cousins...), because those like me can rationally accept the fact that human population growth is a real and serious problem?
You know, I think it's really weird that the culture of creationists is against contaception. They seem to really embrace, at an intuitive level, the idea of natural selection. I just mean that procreation and survival are central to their culture, if not their ideology. Whereas athiests (including myself) seem to so often be individualistic, and not want to have children.
I'm so glad this is back. I had to watch it again and it is SOOOOOOO good! What a relief. I was really becoming nervous that we were going to lose potholer54's channel. Thank you potholer54 and excellent work as always.
I believe God is the master scientist, chemist, physicist, biologist, architect, etc. That is how he is able to 'CREATE'. Man has only just figured out/broken down the process and the science behind his method of creation. 6 days could just have easily meant 6 thousand years, etc. Why do people not see that there has to be a master designer when they see the intricacies and complexities of science.
Analogy: Aliens find metal, silicon, circuits, Intel chips 4004, 486, Pentium, Core, Quad Core - they take n study. Alien A: “This is evolution, it improves itself each time it reproduces to become better n faster”. Alien B: “I disagree, this is too intricately complex to just put itself together by chance; I believe there is a higher intelligence that is creating it by design. I cannot prove it but this is easier to believe than to believe in an unbelievable amount of chance
Alien C: A seems to have point. They are becoming better and better. A "higher inteilligence" seems possible, but let's not jump to that comclusion until we can find any evidence.
How to believe that life with its insurmountable number of forms, species n complexities, humans being the most complex n intelligent complete with a conscience, can all have come about by spontaneous merging? If u mixed up all the ingredients that make up a human in a jar then left it for a trillion years, it would not have evolved into a baby with a pumping heart n a soul without divine intervention n design.
@becausewhybecause That's not how evolution works you retard. It's not just ingredients + time. Things evolve depending on their situation and what might help them better survive. I'm no expert but I understand enough to know it's far more likely than any other possibility.
The only thing you've said in support of your arguement is "It had to have been it's all so complex."
Evolution has it's stacks of evidence while creation has 0.
Obviously 'situation' plays a part, putting all the ingredients in a jar is simply implying that if all the right elements and factors were put together to give it a head start in its path to 'better survive'. The 'stacks of evidence' just shows HOW it was CREATED. And certainly you haven't evolved from resorting to rudeness in a discussion not to your agreement.
@random Wow,I don't care abt such egotistical accomplishments n if backing down's a big deal 2 you I’d already decided 2 stop discussion with 1 track narrow minded rude individual. So u can gloat: I m new to YT commenting n hv not figured out how it works yet trying 2 comment via iTouch n finding out it doesn't reflect here. I don't know amenakin from a bar of soap n m in no way sympathetic 2 her or 2 religious fanatics who give the faith a bad name. Hope u see the light before u meet your maker
"fSo u can gloat: I m new to YT commenting n hv not figured out how it works yet trying 2 comment via iTouch n finding out it doesn't reflect here. I don't know amenakin from a bar of soap n m in no way sympathetic 2 her or 2 religious fanatics who give the faith a bad name."
I like how we weren't even talking about that.
How about you actually reply to what I said? You may not know much about YT but creationists have a habit of trying sneaky things.
@becausewhybecause That analogy is a very well-designed display of your ignorance. Neither Alien A or B would think that any of that reproduced the next because it wouldn't take long for them to see they don't reproduce, at all. For example, when did we think that rocks reproduced into more and more precious stones? We never thought that, because rocks don't reproduce. Also, your imagary of Alien B is retarded as evolution does not happen by chance. Please pick up a grade school textbook.
@becausewhybecause: That's just another statement of the very tired and worn-out teleological argument. You are assuming that there's a creator, not providing any convincing reasons for believing such.
Analogy: Aliens find metal, silicon, circuits, Intel chips 4004, 486, Pentium, Core, Quad Core - they take n study. Alien A: “This is evolution, it improves itself each time it reproduces to become better n faster”. Alien B: “I disagree, this is too intricately complex to just put itself together by chance; I believe there is a higher intelligence that is creating it by design. I cannot prove it but this is easier to believe than to believe in an unbelievable amount of chance.
@becausewhybecause BECAUSE, we're adults. We also take the time to actually learn and understand the science. Your eyes show you "intricacies and complexities." Science explains them.
Science is just the term used to describe the discoveries of intelligent men who have analysed, tested, think they've figured out and put into theories and words their understanding of how the universe works and came about as created by a Master Designer. It is not enough just to know how it all works but why and what for. Science is great and the more I delve into it, the more I am in awe of the Creator.
@becausewhybecause Yes, good point. Science IS just a term used to decribe the evidence found and tested by intelligent men. Good argument against it. Your problem lies in you thinking that there has to be a "why" and "what for" for everything. Most things, just are. Sorry, but don't worry, you're still special. Where you are "in awe of the Creator," you should be in awe that you are here, despite all the chances that you wouldn't be.
I don’t think ‘why’ and ‘what for’ is a problem, it is what makes us intelligent beings with a mind/soul, as opposed to a tree or a snail or a cat, for whom ‘most things just are’; scientists wouldn’t be scientists if they didn’t question‘why’ and ‘what for’. You are right, I am thankful to my creator for his grace and mercy each day, for another day of breath to spend with my loved ones knowing that it only takes a blink of an eye for it to no longer be so.
@becausewhybecause "Why and what for" are only valid questions for things done by thinking creatures. Unfortunately, Earth and our universe give no impression of such. If you actually "delve into [science]" as you claimed, you would see that more and more. Scientist do not ask "why and what for," they ask "what, how and when" and then they find evidence for the answers. You are just taking anything they discover and saying, "Yeah, God did it." This is childishly moronic.
I have just asked the question ‘Why’ am I wasting my time here? ‘What for’? There will never be complete ‘answers’ about the universe, if all were revealed to us, there would be no requirement for faith. And you are absolutely right – its got to be child-like faith. Mark 10 verse 15: “Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall in no wise enter therein.”
@becausewhybecause "Do not allow a sorceress to live." -Exodus 22:18 Yeah, a lot of good realistic advice from that book. You really showed me to be foolish.
You are right about what having all the answers could mean to us though. We do surprisingly have almost all the answers about the universe (ingredients, age, motion, etc.) and it's true, there's "no requirement for faith." I just fail to see how this is a bad thing. Anyways, best of luck on killing non-virgins and non-believers.
@selvmordspilot Because the "Monkeys" that evolved into humans do not exist anymore because they are now humans. I don't know if you were clowning around and already knew my answer.
FoxNewzLies says ..."because monkey's evolved into humans" ????...HAHAHAHA! There is what happens when morons get loose on YouTube. They like climategate lies and really jazz up evolution lies when they get the chance. Prognosis negative on getting heads of pure popcorn like this to listen and connect the actual factual dots. About "creation".
@memama2 I can see your post even if you are to afraid to directly attack me. What the hell is climategate? Can you prove me wrong? After reading your babble maybe I was wrong that monkeys that evolved into humans no longer exist.
@memama2 Ya your little friend here is nuts. I see him make weird animal sounds and talk stupid at the T.V. Are you sure that that is type of moron you want to promote?
A Muslim woman once told me that their "Lord" favourite white women, because black people will always remain slaves, what she forgot to tell me was that she was a slave anyway, because she always walked 3 feet behind her husband!
@heavymetaldeath4life -- Thanks. Someone else pointed out the error, but I didn't have time to correct it before the video was pulled. I've now added an annotation with the correct label.
@LondonIrishRover@geragna@unclexbob IIRC ad hominem means an attack on the credulity of the opponent based on their beliefs or on who they are.
potholer54 seems to be trying to debunk the validity of amenakin's claims on evolution based on the fact that she makes cosmetic reviews videos. The videos are unrelated and mention of them is unnecessary.
That being said, amenakin is ignorant about evolution and perfectly nominable for crocoduck as explained by the rest of potholer54's video.
@fedobear "potholer54 seems to be trying to debunk the validity of amenakin's claims on evolution based on the fact that she makes cosmetic reviews videos." [sic]
what? no one needs to attempt to "debunk the validity" of her claims, she does a spectacular job of it herself.
What it did do was to show her level of scientific literacy... And what with evolution being... well, science.....
You said it yourself, she is ignorant of evolution, better for her to stay with the cosmetics, no? :D
Creationist anything is stupid. Anenakin must be fuming right now. Too bad, ignorance shouldn't be tolerated. And to think she never formally apologised for all the trouble she has caused. She still maintains this stance and even dared to say she should have sourced it better. She acts like she's so confident in her beliefs and yet the second someone calls her out she silences them on grounds of defamation and hate speech. Why did she not debate the issue like a scientist?
@theDaisytheMinnie One of the hardest things to do is admit when you're wrong. I would guess that most of Anenakin's reaction was in anger and embarrassment at being called out so soundly on something she assumed to be true. We've all seen people react this way and hopefully she's taken the opportunity to do a little growing up. At the very least she may actually investigate both sides of whatever science she chooses to tackle in the future.
and she is selling chemicals to put on your skin. If her understanding of evolution is this bad what makes you think that her chemical make-up is safe?
This gasoline based eye wash is great for freshening up your pupils and really melts away those pesky eye lashes.
@Arcexey She was just defiant. It was literal defiance in the face of any coherence. It's amazing how Dawkins kept his cool.....I'm not sure at what point I would have begun to roll up sheets of paper and just start throwing them at her whilst she talked or perhaps stop talking and just start poking her until she went away. Why didn't Dawkins take a book with him, or some pictures? I guess she would have just shut her eyes.
Look at these fossils...NO If I can't see them they don't exist!!
@ummmerrrrummm Obviously nobody should take her 'defiance' as an automatic defeat for her argument, or that her putting her fingers in her ears and going 'lalala' means evolution is fact by default, but it certainly sheds some light on her agenda: Ignore what goes against the bullshit I'm spewing, and focus on the 'relevant' (and coincidental) connections between evolution and ID.
As for Dawkins, the precious look on his face would be much the same for if she just said the earth is a pyramid.
@Arcexey Is she even an ID'ist? I forget, it's been a while since I watched that interview... although I still wake up sometimes screaming. I thought she was just a straight up young Earth Creationist. In amongst her defiance, I think what was bad, was how she kept laughing derisively. She just seemed offensive at times... it wasn't very polite, whilst contrariliy Dawkins attempted to maintain composure and manners... although I'm sure he felt like returning the sentiment.
You don't have to "beleive" the theory of evolution. you have to accept the observations that result from natural selection. which is a principal. and evolution is a deduction on the validity of natural selection. this girl is a moron.
Wendy Wright is a beacon of reason. Why would she be included in a video such as this? She set Dawkins straight patiently discussing the issue, answering all questions without changing the subject, pointing out how little an Oxford professor of biology would know about biology, laughing at the rediculous evidence he proposed, thus illustrating how little evidence for evolution there is.
Female creationists are the same as male creationists. They're just quiet and not as active most of the time. Still just as ignorant. Women in general are more cautious of stating their opinions and thoughts because they are more concerned about social stigmatization. Men don't give a shit.
What about women who deceitfully use false information in order to make claims against evolutionary theory's validity? I know that wasn't the focus of the video, but I didn't see any Kent Hovinds up there. I saw a lot of Kirk Camerons, though. :p
Maybe that says something about the culture. Men can get into greater positions of power within the framework of traditional church hierarchies and may have a more vested interest in using information which they know is false to enhance their position.
I have given my whole life to charity ... How about you?
lesleyjaneuk 1 day ago
Ih
lesleyjaneuk 1 day ago
loved your video and the Chanel...
but you should write where the song is from...
Stupid Girls - pink just to be on the safe side (and because its grate music)
dvolokita 4 days ago
I like the idea that men r just more stupid, however inaccurate that mayb :P
cruelbusiness1984 2 weeks ago
Just thought.... If eggs,butter,milk,sugar,flour...were left on a table they would never make a cake without a cake maker...
lesleyjaneuk 3 weeks ago
@lesleyjaneuk so glad u know so little about nucleic acids that u think its like cake. go pick up a science book b4 u make a fool of urself
cruelbusiness1984 2 weeks ago
Yes. Everything that's in you zinc,copper,arsenic!! Etc is in the ground . Very clever wouldn't you say !!!
lesleyjaneuk 3 weeks ago
I'm sorry, although i didn't have a great understanding. I've grasped the theory of evolution and the principles of natural and artificial selection since i was about 10. Why are these people less intelligent than I was at 10?
MisterFro9 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from potholer54
Sweet vid. subbed .
BillofRightsBrutus 4 weeks ago
The other day I stomped an atheist, was fun.
iGreekSalad 1 month ago
These are the type of Muslims that are trying to enforce Sharia Law (their law based on their religion) in the Western World.
Don't let them! Fight them!
pcgamer010 1 month ago
Plant kind , animal kind ,humankind . They are kinds that stay the same . Fish never turn into elephants. Plants never turn into humans . A rose is only ever going to be a rose . Plus in its rose kind ..there are limits
lesleyjaneuk 1 month ago
@lesleyjaneuk Yes, we know none of those things happen. What is your argument? Evolution has never said that a fish will turn into an elephant or plant will turn into a human. You're comment is made due to a complete ignorance of the theory of evolution. If you're going to comment on Potholer54's videos, might I suggest you actually watch them first?
eyeh8u1 1 month ago
@lesleyjaneuk Yes, that's right! Show those stupid evilutionists how stupid they are! Why can't they be smart enough to see that obviously man evolved from dirt, and women evolved from a man's rib, and that everything else evolved instantly from nothingness? What are they gonna say next? That light comes from the sun? LOL! Nonsense! Read a bible people! Light existed before the sun. Duh!
beaster29 3 weeks ago
Evo s are never consistent in their theory ....one minute it's survival of he fittest ...but now I detect comments are evolving to being loving . Why not give in and admit there is a designer behind it all . God made us and not we ourselves Ps 100 vs 3
lesleyjaneuk 1 month ago
@lesleyjaneuk I'm glad you brought this up. The misconception comes from two things:
1. Most people who believe in evolution don't have a degree in biology so they're not very good at explaining it.
2. "Survival of the fittest" is often confused with "survival of the strongest." Being fit simply means being more likely to reproduce. So in the case of humans and other herd animals, the ability to get along and work together is part of our survival.
PM me if you have more questions.
jmhizon83 1 month ago in playlist More videos from potholer54 2
Amenakin uses comment approvals on her channels. Figures!
a1mint 1 month ago 2
Science doesn't know the answer to the common cold,cancer and man is faced with man ruining this earth. Ooooh so glad I don't put trust in science. I would rather put my trust in the top scientist ,the creator of all the clever design . Soon this earth will be how he meant it to be a paradise psalms 37vs10,11,29. No war,sickness,death. Revelation 21vs3,4 now that's what I put my trust in
lesleyjaneuk 1 month ago
@lesleyjaneuk So you don't trust science because it doesn't have an answer to everything, but you would rather trust the "top scientist" (god) who has not given any answers to anything. Nor do you not trust science because you believe man is destroying the earth, but you trust God who said that he is going to destroy the Earth?
Yeah, makes perfect sense...
eyeh8u1 1 month ago
Science only ever discovers what's already been designed . 1,000s years ago washing hands,don't touch dead bodies ,bury excrement to stop disease was recorded by Moses. Then Isaiah 40 vs 22 earth is a circle job 26vs7 this impressed me as scientists didn't know his until they discovered it thousands of years later . But the holy writings did. Who told Moses?
lesleyjaneuk 1 month ago
@lesleyjaneuk Oh dear, where do I begin? The fact that ancient people did or did not do what you describe does NOT show that they were privy to some sort of scientific knowledge that science itself didn't discover until years later. It doesn't take a genius (even in ancient times) to see that dead bodies decay, human excrement smells bad (so bury it) or if your hands are filthy, to rinse them off before eating. What they didn't know was what exactly would cause sickness i.e "Germ Theory."
eyeh8u1 1 month ago
@lesleyjaneuk To imply that ancient people were somehow knowledgeable about germ theory is beyond ridiculous. As I said before, none of what you describe shows "scientific" knowledge. Many of those things were common sense based on easily observed outcomes (play with poop and you'll get sick just like that nice Jones boy) even animals instinctively know this (ever own a cat?)
eyeh8u1 1 month ago
Love these videos :D
bigolol 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
I met a man collecting for charity and he believed in evo. So I said well I thought it was survival of the fittest so where does love,kindness ,care,come into it? He couldn't answer it.
lesleyjaneuk 2 months ago
@lesleyjaneuk He couldn't answer it (if your story is true, which I doubt it is btw) because evolution has nothing to do with love, kindness and care. Also, your implied definition of the term "survival of the fittest" is completely ignorant as it pertains to evolution, hence the moronic question you supposedly posed to the man collecting for charity.
eyeh8u1 1 month ago
@lesleyjaneuk =where does love,kindness ,care,come into it? He couldn't answer it.= Probably because the poor guy wasn't an evolutionary biologist, he was just collecting for charity. If you want to know where human altruism comes from, ask someone who's studied it. Take a look at my video 'Atheists are immoral - debunked' on the Potholer54debunks channel.
potholer54 1 month ago 25
@lesleyjaneuk Love, kindness, care, morals, and all the rest of it, are all normal natural human values. As humans, we don't do well alone, we instead rely on being part of a pack. When we show ourselves in crowds, we don't expect to get attacked, we expect to take place in a community. We're community oriented.
We naturally look out and are interested in the well-being of others. Not that we would automatically give, but we're interested how others do.
a1mint 1 month ago 2
@lesleyjaneuk I asked a woman who believed in god how the universe could have come into being through supernatural means, she couldn't answer it.
Blargaha 3 weeks ago in playlist Fler videoklipp från potholer54
@lesleyjaneuk
I hope you gave to that charity.
June28July 1 day ago
To start, I am a fan and subscriber of Amena's. Since I've listened to what she had to say for quite some time, I was initially on her side. This was before I saw this video. I agree with Potholer54's viewpoint that he should have the chance to respond to things that are made public on youtube. While I respect Amena, she was clearly incorrect about evolution. This video shouldn't have been removed. Instead, people should be encouraged to see it so they can get Potholer's side of the story.
TheNewHijabi 2 months ago 3
Comment removed
sahandpar 2 months ago in playlist Interesting
Obviously it is because their religious texts prevent them from teaching, that is why there aren't more women talking nonsense on youtube
PropheticJeff 2 months ago
I think women are definitely more modest on average... at least until they are more certain. I have no clue why that is, nor can I confirm it, but we definitely have some strong representatives of atheist females even here on Youtube, which is very refreshing.
BeBoBli 2 months ago
Amenakin got stomped. lol
dingleflorden 2 months ago in playlist More videos from potholer54
God dammit!! Quit talking about skin care!
FoxNewzLies 2 months ago
"Why aren't Monkeys still evolving" is the best :D
Yes, they evolve over Night :D
bogartdaniel 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos 2
for the beauty contestants at the end- they cant be that hot and also be smart. That would rip a hole in the universe, dude.
spatch8806 2 months ago
@spatch8806
Well Natalie Portman and Kate Beckinsale are pretty smart and also really hot. Altough they are not beaty contestans...
Pikkabuu 2 months ago
She has deleted the original video
Tamizushi 2 months ago
:) Back!
Forkroute 3 months ago
Hmm, just got the chance to actually see this for the first time now that it's back up. Honestly, I don't see why people were getting so worked up. It's no different than any of your other Golden Crocoduck videos. On a lighter note, does anyone know the name of the song during the salute?
soasertsus 3 months ago
@soasertsus stupid girls, by pink
morpheuskibbe 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
It's annoying how the Amena spaz overshadowed my favorite part of this video- the actual "Salute" part at 7:18 which is arguably far more groundbreaking than just dealing with Amena's misrepresentations specifically- and a lot more fun. I don't think I've seen anyone else compliment that section but I definitely found it a well-timed and organized. I love the little inclusion of Dawkins saying, "Oh really...?" hehehe The only thing I wonder at are the black and white photos- i.e., who they are
Whatistobe 3 months ago
great work!
love your videos
zoiladesi 3 months ago
I asked a creationist "what is it about evolution that is so hard to accept?" She answered, " We are not descendants of monkeys. That's like calling my grandfather a monkey. I find that offensive."
So perhaps creations are really egomaniacs, whose self-worth is tied into the belief that their god made them. And this makes them special in some way.
jrvenice1999 3 months ago 29
@jrvenice1999 Then I would say to the creationist. "As a human I'm related to you, a being so ignorant and refusing to learn anything new, or perhaps not even able to learn the simplest thing. And I find that offensive. I'd rather be related to a monkey, preferrably a clever and curious monkey." They simply refuse to realize that they are less than a fart compared to the infinite wonder of the universe. And sure, I guess some may find comfort in it, but I find the wonder, amazing.
fraglimat 2 weeks ago
@jrvenice1999 I'd rather be an ape descendant than a pile of dirt as creationists would believe...
saejinoh 3 days ago
You must sue her and youtube for the distress you've been under due to her illegal actions in removing your videos
eveningniteshade 3 months ago
This is sad. In order to satisfy her subscribers, she dared to venture to the unknown water. and that one wrong move...
Islam does have a very modern code of conducts for example sufism where the four gates of speech is practiced. I guess this is unknown to her.
ekanipata 3 months ago
Thrilled to death your videos were reinstated, I didn't get to see them before they were taken down. Congratulations & please keep up the excellent work my friend..
sheri226 3 months ago in playlist More videos from potholer54
great video,
the teaching of stupidity cannot be tolerated regardless of gender
hawkertruffelsnout 3 months ago
Man got white and man got smart innit man!
Ashitaka255 3 months ago
It sickens me to be subjected to such ignorant, arrogant people. The world is doomed unless we can shake off these religious morons.
DaToNyOyO 3 months ago 28
@DaToNyOyO The greatest irony of all is that these religious nuts (Like banana man Ray Comfort and Crocoduck boy) will the spell the death of religion.
Makedonche 2 months ago
@Makedonche If they just sit down and don't open there mouths again.
Makedonche 2 months ago
Your sense of humor and comical timing never fail to make me laugh out loud. It is balm for my heart to hear science defended so refreshingly against people that have been indoctrinated with religion and that never dared to challenge what they have been spoonfed mindlessly by others.
Lylania 3 months ago 2
If you choose not to have children, does that mean you are "unfit", by definition? Does that mean your rational brain has gotten in the way of a natural process that directly links you to the first living creature on Earth? Or is it that sort of thinking that will actually allow our survival as a species (not my genes, directly - but those of my sisters or cousins...), because those like me can rationally accept the fact that human population growth is a real and serious problem?
soyqueen01 3 months ago
You know, I think it's really weird that the culture of creationists is against contaception. They seem to really embrace, at an intuitive level, the idea of natural selection. I just mean that procreation and survival are central to their culture, if not their ideology. Whereas athiests (including myself) seem to so often be individualistic, and not want to have children.
soyqueen01 3 months ago
I've missed you Potholer!
I want to see more women crocoduck nominees! The backlash from anonymous "protectors" of girls is especially interesting.
soyqueen01 3 months ago
Good job winning
MrForfudgesake 3 months ago in playlist More videos from potholer54
I'm so glad this is back. I had to watch it again and it is SOOOOOOO good! What a relief. I was really becoming nervous that we were going to lose potholer54's channel. Thank you potholer54 and excellent work as always.
delataylor 3 months ago
Great to finally see this video. It was taken down before I ever got around to it :-/
Cephalochordata 3 months ago
07:54 That woman really got me angry!
torkamarinum 3 months ago
Glad you got your videos back up and running. Will be watching. Love your videos!
sh00008 3 months ago
It's not make believe. Its make-up believe.
GordonWolters 3 months ago
I believe God is the master scientist, chemist, physicist, biologist, architect, etc. That is how he is able to 'CREATE'. Man has only just figured out/broken down the process and the science behind his method of creation. 6 days could just have easily meant 6 thousand years, etc. Why do people not see that there has to be a master designer when they see the intricacies and complexities of science.
becausewhybecause 3 months ago
@becausewhybecause "there has to be a master designer"
Says who? You can't just say that:
there has to be is that complex
or
there is no other explanation
We don't KNOW how it all came about. But we have very good theories supported by evidence.
Creastionists have... 2000 year old desert scribblings and a god who likes to play a really REALLY hard game of "Where's Wally?".
randomperson2538 3 months ago
@randomperson2538
Analogy: Aliens find metal, silicon, circuits, Intel chips 4004, 486, Pentium, Core, Quad Core - they take n study. Alien A: “This is evolution, it improves itself each time it reproduces to become better n faster”. Alien B: “I disagree, this is too intricately complex to just put itself together by chance; I believe there is a higher intelligence that is creating it by design. I cannot prove it but this is easier to believe than to believe in an unbelievable amount of chance
becausewhybecause 3 months ago
@becausewhybecause Terrible analogy. But I'll go along with it.
Alien C: A seems to have point. They are becoming better and better. A "higher inteilligence" seems possible, but let's not jump to that comclusion until we can find any evidence.
randomperson2538 3 months ago
@randomperson2538
How to believe that life with its insurmountable number of forms, species n complexities, humans being the most complex n intelligent complete with a conscience, can all have come about by spontaneous merging? If u mixed up all the ingredients that make up a human in a jar then left it for a trillion years, it would not have evolved into a baby with a pumping heart n a soul without divine intervention n design.
creation com/15-questions
becausewhybecause 3 months ago
@becausewhybecause That's not how evolution works you retard. It's not just ingredients + time. Things evolve depending on their situation and what might help them better survive. I'm no expert but I understand enough to know it's far more likely than any other possibility.
The only thing you've said in support of your arguement is "It had to have been it's all so complex."
Evolution has it's stacks of evidence while creation has 0.
And Evolution is STILL looking for more.
Creation, isn't.
randomperson2538 3 months ago
@randomperson2538
Obviously 'situation' plays a part, putting all the ingredients in a jar is simply implying that if all the right elements and factors were put together to give it a head start in its path to 'better survive'. The 'stacks of evidence' just shows HOW it was CREATED. And certainly you haven't evolved from resorting to rudeness in a discussion not to your agreement.
becausewhybecause 3 months ago
@becausewhybecause Is there any particular reason you send me this in a message then when I reply you put this in the comments?
Is it because you were hoping I wouldn't see it so I would seem to backdown, or that my +500 character comment is just too big for youtube?
randomperson2538 3 months ago
@random Wow,I don't care abt such egotistical accomplishments n if backing down's a big deal 2 you I’d already decided 2 stop discussion with 1 track narrow minded rude individual. So u can gloat: I m new to YT commenting n hv not figured out how it works yet trying 2 comment via iTouch n finding out it doesn't reflect here. I don't know amenakin from a bar of soap n m in no way sympathetic 2 her or 2 religious fanatics who give the faith a bad name. Hope u see the light before u meet your maker
becausewhybecause 3 months ago
@becausewhybecause
"fSo u can gloat: I m new to YT commenting n hv not figured out how it works yet trying 2 comment via iTouch n finding out it doesn't reflect here. I don't know amenakin from a bar of soap n m in no way sympathetic 2 her or 2 religious fanatics who give the faith a bad name."
I like how we weren't even talking about that.
How about you actually reply to what I said? You may not know much about YT but creationists have a habit of trying sneaky things.
randomperson2538 3 months ago
@becausewhybecause That analogy is a very well-designed display of your ignorance. Neither Alien A or B would think that any of that reproduced the next because it wouldn't take long for them to see they don't reproduce, at all. For example, when did we think that rocks reproduced into more and more precious stones? We never thought that, because rocks don't reproduce. Also, your imagary of Alien B is retarded as evolution does not happen by chance. Please pick up a grade school textbook.
delataylor 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@becausewhybecause "6 days could just have easily meant 6 thousand years"
Except that it was 13.7 billion years.
heavymetaldeath4life 3 months ago
@becausewhybecause: That's just another statement of the very tired and worn-out teleological argument. You are assuming that there's a creator, not providing any convincing reasons for believing such.
MikeSwistek 3 months ago
@MikeSwistek
Analogy: Aliens find metal, silicon, circuits, Intel chips 4004, 486, Pentium, Core, Quad Core - they take n study. Alien A: “This is evolution, it improves itself each time it reproduces to become better n faster”. Alien B: “I disagree, this is too intricately complex to just put itself together by chance; I believe there is a higher intelligence that is creating it by design. I cannot prove it but this is easier to believe than to believe in an unbelievable amount of chance.
becausewhybecause 3 months ago
@becausewhybecause BECAUSE, we're adults. We also take the time to actually learn and understand the science. Your eyes show you "intricacies and complexities." Science explains them.
delataylor 3 months ago
@delataylor
Science is just the term used to describe the discoveries of intelligent men who have analysed, tested, think they've figured out and put into theories and words their understanding of how the universe works and came about as created by a Master Designer. It is not enough just to know how it all works but why and what for. Science is great and the more I delve into it, the more I am in awe of the Creator.
conservapedia com/Evolution
creation com/15-questions
becausewhybecause 3 months ago
@becausewhybecause Yes, good point. Science IS just a term used to decribe the evidence found and tested by intelligent men. Good argument against it. Your problem lies in you thinking that there has to be a "why" and "what for" for everything. Most things, just are. Sorry, but don't worry, you're still special. Where you are "in awe of the Creator," you should be in awe that you are here, despite all the chances that you wouldn't be.
Google Scholar / More Than 15 Answers
delataylor 3 months ago 2
@delataylor
I don’t think ‘why’ and ‘what for’ is a problem, it is what makes us intelligent beings with a mind/soul, as opposed to a tree or a snail or a cat, for whom ‘most things just are’; scientists wouldn’t be scientists if they didn’t question‘why’ and ‘what for’. You are right, I am thankful to my creator for his grace and mercy each day, for another day of breath to spend with my loved ones knowing that it only takes a blink of an eye for it to no longer be so.
becausewhybecause 3 months ago
@becausewhybecause "Why and what for" are only valid questions for things done by thinking creatures. Unfortunately, Earth and our universe give no impression of such. If you actually "delve into [science]" as you claimed, you would see that more and more. Scientist do not ask "why and what for," they ask "what, how and when" and then they find evidence for the answers. You are just taking anything they discover and saying, "Yeah, God did it." This is childishly moronic.
delataylor 3 months ago
@delataylor
I have just asked the question ‘Why’ am I wasting my time here? ‘What for’? There will never be complete ‘answers’ about the universe, if all were revealed to us, there would be no requirement for faith. And you are absolutely right – its got to be child-like faith. Mark 10 verse 15: “Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall in no wise enter therein.”
becausewhybecause 3 months ago
@becausewhybecause "Do not allow a sorceress to live." -Exodus 22:18 Yeah, a lot of good realistic advice from that book. You really showed me to be foolish.
You are right about what having all the answers could mean to us though. We do surprisingly have almost all the answers about the universe (ingredients, age, motion, etc.) and it's true, there's "no requirement for faith." I just fail to see how this is a bad thing. Anyways, best of luck on killing non-virgins and non-believers.
delataylor 3 months ago
"why aren't monkeys still evolving into humans."
I lold hard
selvmordspilot 3 months ago
@selvmordspilot Because the "Monkeys" that evolved into humans do not exist anymore because they are now humans. I don't know if you were clowning around and already knew my answer.
FoxNewzLies 2 months ago
FoxNewzLies says ..."because monkey's evolved into humans" ????...HAHAHAHA! There is what happens when morons get loose on YouTube. They like climategate lies and really jazz up evolution lies when they get the chance. Prognosis negative on getting heads of pure popcorn like this to listen and connect the actual factual dots. About "creation".
memama2 2 months ago
@memama2 I can see your post even if you are to afraid to directly attack me. What the hell is climategate? Can you prove me wrong? After reading your babble maybe I was wrong that monkeys that evolved into humans no longer exist.
FoxNewzLies 2 months ago
@FoxNewzLies = go watch YouTube's videos posted by: shockofgod. Then get back to me.
memama2 2 months ago
@memama2 Umm no. You made the comment I made my point to your comment. You tell me why I am wrong. Even if you need someone elses words.
FoxNewzLies 2 months ago
@memama2 Ya your little friend here is nuts. I see him make weird animal sounds and talk stupid at the T.V. Are you sure that that is type of moron you want to promote?
FoxNewzLies 2 months ago
@FoxNewzLies : notice the quotation marks ("..."). I were referring to what one of the people in the video said.
selvmordspilot 2 months ago
@selvmordspilot Ah gotcha.
FoxNewzLies 2 months ago
A Muslim woman once told me that their "Lord" favourite white women, because black people will always remain slaves, what she forgot to tell me was that she was a slave anyway, because she always walked 3 feet behind her husband!
Bodellia 3 months ago
I refuse to believe that this women holds a "first class science degree from an honor's college!" Glad to see this video is back Potholer!
UpwardBound5656 3 months ago
you have made me laugh so hard I fell out of bed great video,
AngstromJohnny 3 months ago
lol amanackin
m00ph00 3 months ago
Epic Vid! gratz..:D
TheLordAnnatar 3 months ago
Thanks for fighting the good fight against the brainwashed.
LIVEFRMNYC 3 months ago 36
@LIVEFRMNYC I second that.
Kragdude 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Evolution is a HOPE?!?! WAAAAHHHH!!!!????
orwellianspy27 3 months ago
LMAO @3:00
orwellianspy27 3 months ago
I love how creationists make evolution sound when they themselves do not understand it
orwellianspy27 3 months ago
Love the beginning =D "God damnit! Will you stop talking about skincare, eyecream and cleanser and give us your opinion on Charles bloody Darwin!"
makaralaatikko 3 months ago
Hurray for Fair Use!
trythinkingnow 3 months ago in playlist More videos from potholer54
Phew!! Glad to see this video back up!!
WWZenaDo 3 months ago
@6:40 That's Hydrogen Peroxide
heavymetaldeath4life 3 months ago in playlist More videos from potholer54
@heavymetaldeath4life -- Thanks. Someone else pointed out the error, but I didn't have time to correct it before the video was pulled. I've now added an annotation with the correct label.
potholer54 3 months ago
@potholer54 islam is a load of nonsence
jordanmylesevans 3 months ago
Awesome! I can finally watch the video! Good work Potholer!
RisqueRooster 3 months ago
Congrats on getting the video back on Youtube. You da man, Potholer. :)
Tanoro 3 months ago in playlist More videos from potholer54
Stay away from theories! (...and what not)
Thanks Barbie. We don't want our brain to overheat by all of these facts and thinking and what not.
mehja1 3 months ago
gratz to the video being put back up
spenore 3 months ago
@LondonIrishRover @geragna @unclexbob IIRC ad hominem means an attack on the credulity of the opponent based on their beliefs or on who they are.
potholer54 seems to be trying to debunk the validity of amenakin's claims on evolution based on the fact that she makes cosmetic reviews videos. The videos are unrelated and mention of them is unnecessary.
That being said, amenakin is ignorant about evolution and perfectly nominable for crocoduck as explained by the rest of potholer54's video.
fedobear 3 months ago
@fedobear "potholer54 seems to be trying to debunk the validity of amenakin's claims on evolution based on the fact that she makes cosmetic reviews videos." [sic]
what? no one needs to attempt to "debunk the validity" of her claims, she does a spectacular job of it herself.
What it did do was to show her level of scientific literacy... And what with evolution being... well, science.....
You said it yourself, she is ignorant of evolution, better for her to stay with the cosmetics, no? :D
frackcha 3 months ago
Comment removed
PhaseBlur 3 months ago
lmao the video is back up!
TechGriffin 3 months ago in playlist More videos from potholer54
Nice to see this video back! Favourited. I shall return to if often when I need to have a laugh :)
LAnonHubbard 3 months ago
Creationist anything is stupid. Anenakin must be fuming right now. Too bad, ignorance shouldn't be tolerated. And to think she never formally apologised for all the trouble she has caused. She still maintains this stance and even dared to say she should have sourced it better. She acts like she's so confident in her beliefs and yet the second someone calls her out she silences them on grounds of defamation and hate speech. Why did she not debate the issue like a scientist?
theDaisytheMinnie 3 months ago 21
@theDaisytheMinnie One of the hardest things to do is admit when you're wrong. I would guess that most of Anenakin's reaction was in anger and embarrassment at being called out so soundly on something she assumed to be true. We've all seen people react this way and hopefully she's taken the opportunity to do a little growing up. At the very least she may actually investigate both sides of whatever science she chooses to tackle in the future.
htomerif 3 months ago
Superb!
LudwigSpiegel 3 months ago
She's hot
camino1ca 3 months ago
@camino1ca sadly,she'll not date, but marry a man of same dogma, U a muslim son? :P
eat666shit 3 months ago
@eat666shit Nope, no religion at all. You would be surprised, she might date:) Hot in any case.
camino1ca 3 months ago
@camino1ca i was jokin' man , you might have what it takes to "knock" some sense in her -nudge,nudge,wink,wink- :D
eat666shit 3 months ago
@eat666shit I could only wish. Really very cute, but just a youtube fantasy lol
camino1ca 3 months ago
Was that watermark in the original video? Somehow I doubt it...
FunkyHonkyCDXX 3 months ago
ugh, wish this would have remained blocked. Hearing them talk is making me lose faith in humanity.
spatch8806 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Favorite this video so even more people see it.
TritoneMcgee 3 months ago
Maybe she's born with it.....
Maybe it's Make-believe!
Mammothviking 3 months ago 26
@Mammothviking that was fucking hilarious!
loz1023 3 months ago
and she is selling chemicals to put on your skin. If her understanding of evolution is this bad what makes you think that her chemical make-up is safe?
This gasoline based eye wash is great for freshening up your pupils and really melts away those pesky eye lashes.
Mammothviking 3 months ago
Amenakin is stupid as hell.
logicbloke 3 months ago
Now that I am seeing this video for the first time, I am hearing the phrase "...So you really have to think..." more times then necessary...
320iguy 3 months ago
If you ever watch the Dawkins - Wendi Wright debate, shown at 7:54, you will have your day ruined and you won't be the same person afterwards.
It can be summed up as such:
Dawkins: You can go out in the real world and see this fossil evidence, it's beautiful! Go and see it!
Wendi: N-nono.. -Smile.- There's nothing in those museums. -Smile.-
I can not fathom what the dinner table must be like at Wendi's home.
Arcexey 3 months ago
@Arcexey She was just defiant. It was literal defiance in the face of any coherence. It's amazing how Dawkins kept his cool.....I'm not sure at what point I would have begun to roll up sheets of paper and just start throwing them at her whilst she talked or perhaps stop talking and just start poking her until she went away. Why didn't Dawkins take a book with him, or some pictures? I guess she would have just shut her eyes.
Look at these fossils...NO If I can't see them they don't exist!!
ummmerrrrummm 3 months ago
@ummmerrrrummm Obviously nobody should take her 'defiance' as an automatic defeat for her argument, or that her putting her fingers in her ears and going 'lalala' means evolution is fact by default, but it certainly sheds some light on her agenda: Ignore what goes against the bullshit I'm spewing, and focus on the 'relevant' (and coincidental) connections between evolution and ID.
As for Dawkins, the precious look on his face would be much the same for if she just said the earth is a pyramid.
Arcexey 3 months ago
@Arcexey Is she even an ID'ist? I forget, it's been a while since I watched that interview... although I still wake up sometimes screaming. I thought she was just a straight up young Earth Creationist. In amongst her defiance, I think what was bad, was how she kept laughing derisively. She just seemed offensive at times... it wasn't very polite, whilst contrariliy Dawkins attempted to maintain composure and manners... although I'm sure he felt like returning the sentiment.
ummmerrrrummm 3 months ago
@ummmerrrrummm You may be right, I just associate the nonsensical 'teach the controversy' statement to ID.
She seemed on edge after Dawkin's first remark of, 'There is no controversy. Evolution is a fact whether you like it or not...'
Arcexey 3 months ago
You don't have to "beleive" the theory of evolution. you have to accept the observations that result from natural selection. which is a principal. and evolution is a deduction on the validity of natural selection. this girl is a moron.
robobrain10000 3 months ago
Wendy Wright is a beacon of reason. Why would she be included in a video such as this? She set Dawkins straight patiently discussing the issue, answering all questions without changing the subject, pointing out how little an Oxford professor of biology would know about biology, laughing at the rediculous evidence he proposed, thus illustrating how little evidence for evolution there is.
ummmerrrrummm 3 months ago
@ummmerrrrummm you're an idiot. Wendy Wright is an idiot.
TheManMostMysterious 3 months ago
@TheManMostMysterious lol
ummmerrrrummm 3 months ago
@ummmerrrrummm I really, really hope you're just joking.
Drgamedood 3 months ago in playlist More videos from potholer54
@Drgamedood Huh, Wendy Wright is a stand up example of how to argue with an evolutionist.... They're so militant!
ummmerrrrummm 3 months ago
@ummmerrrrummm Rape me, troll. Rape me really hard.....
Drgamedood 3 months ago
@Drgamedood What's a troll?.... are you good looking?
ummmerrrrummm 3 months ago
musci was too loud at the end I couldn't hear them talking
cowboyx1970 3 months ago
Female creationists are the same as male creationists. They're just quiet and not as active most of the time. Still just as ignorant. Women in general are more cautious of stating their opinions and thoughts because they are more concerned about social stigmatization. Men don't give a shit.
sillygoose544 3 months ago
Where can I obtain a copy of "WHY ISLAM IS A LOAD of NONSENSE"?
FL3MZA 3 months ago 14
Yeah. video is back
TheZachary86 3 months ago
I agree with the general idea behind this video and its core arguements
but I dont see the need for the ad hominem at the start
fedobear 3 months ago
@fedobear You don't know what "ad hominem" means, clearly.
unclexbob 3 months ago
@fedobear I didn't hear any. What ad-hominem are you talking about?
geragna 3 months ago
@fedobear You know ad hominem doesn't mean 'insult' right?
LondonIrishRover 3 months ago
"Harry Haha" makes a lot of sense....
boxbreaker2011 3 months ago
if muslim women care so much about 'modesty', why even use makeup
also is head hair so uncontrollably sexy in islam or something? lmao
Smeagollum86 3 months ago
What about women who deceitfully use false information in order to make claims against evolutionary theory's validity? I know that wasn't the focus of the video, but I didn't see any Kent Hovinds up there. I saw a lot of Kirk Camerons, though. :p
Maybe that says something about the culture. Men can get into greater positions of power within the framework of traditional church hierarchies and may have a more vested interest in using information which they know is false to enhance their position.
datalal624 3 months ago
RESTORED!!!!
OzzyATC 3 months ago
Amenakin thinks evolution means people became more intelligent? Clearly she is not as evolved as other people then judging by her arguments.
DarkAngel182 3 months ago
Mmmmm...
Tasty lookin' stupid bitches.
MOPEDBRAD 3 months ago
amen to potholer
DanGRtheMan 3 months ago
haha so good
lamb4067 3 months ago
WINNING!
EdgePitSwing 3 months ago
creationist women is just equally stupid as creationist men.
namjignerak 3 months ago