the humans do develope and some day we develope to live on other planets and maybe those that live on that planet get a power that helps them live on that planet like lifting stuff whit your minde like in star wars or somethong else
Interesting, especially looking at it from the other side of the coin. We going out to other worlds so that if something, I mean when, to the Sun, humans won't disappear.
The implications of Multiversal morality is huge. It could mean anything from civilizations committing civilization-wide suicide, to ignoring the rest of the Universe and staying in their own paradise, I mean with an infinite multiverse, what is right and what is wrong? if there as an infinite number of civilizations, doing anything is pointless cause we can't effect something on an infinite scale with finite actions? o.O
@deanmullen10 To the eternal universe any action is without any evaluation. But we are here and we live. We live therefore we plan actions. When we plan actions we have to plan them according to ethics if we want to stay on the right path or even get on the right path. We all are made up of cells which are little animals. All those animals want to live. So we love them. Then we are on the right path. We plan the future out of love. Any loving activity like creating art makes more love.
@KennyReddwooddforest yeah, I figure we should worry about finite issues not infinite issues as we are finite beings, perhaps there are just some things beyond us that we simply shouldn't worry about.
@deanmullen10 Yes, we don't have to worry about the things that have not been detected yet. However we can explore the universe, the brain, and dive much deeper into knowledge than ever before without worrying. Just for fun. I am for never closing the door to the unknown. Information is endless. I do not believe that the Earthlings and that includes animals as well as humans, are finite at all. Humans used to believe that thunder was created by gods. Today we know what it is.
@KennyReddwooddforest We know today that thunder is caused by electricity in the atmosphere. Same with the belief that we have to all die one day. The research in nano technology reveals to us today that we will in around 20 years from now be able to reverse the ageing process and be able to live indefinitely. Check out Dr. Ray Kurzweil's work. Many things which humans believed to be true have been revised later on. Knowledge is in constant flow.
If an advanced civilization is coming our way, they would probably treat our planet like an experimental guinea pig. Harvesting not only natural resources but elements new to them. Look at it this way, our political leaders know right from wrong and continue to deliberately look out for themselves. They understand that humans aren't striving in dominant species but excessive population. You only need a couple million to start all over, to explore the world and eventually the universe.
@SamGaming they would prevent us from firing anything and pretty shut our power suply down before we even knew it
Knowing recently that we can already cloak microscopic particles invisible with only a few hundred years of science
Any alien that could reach us would 100% be cloaked and undetectable.
We can already begin to render matter invisible at a micro scopic level, theres no reason why visitors wouldnt be cloaked, they would be posibly tens of thousands of years head of us if not milions.
I'm seeing a lot of talk about hoping aliens have morals (to say there are some). America invades and exploits countries on our own planet so what would stop aliens doing the same?
Stephen probably is not right here. Well if the aliens want our planet then they must defeat our atomic weapons. And I think they don't want to do it because if we see that we can't win we would blast this planet and take aliens with us.
Simply not worth to touch us from that history point when the atomic weapons were developed.
@shawn3213 we have not only nukes (they can disable electronics but some mini nuke versions don't use electronics) but biological weapons also and some pretty effective ones. This is no win no win situation in any case.
And also I believe that some kind of virus is also lethal for them as is for us.
If just they would be some sort of machine based civilization then it would be harder to defeat them but still possible. They can also nuke us from the cosmos.
All we have to go on, as far as other intelligent civilization is concerned, is our own. I don't think that makes it invalid, just limited. We have nothing concrete about other moral systems, other evolutionary results, etc. It's just a crapshoot that produces some fascinating ideas, like hiveminds, and intelligent but non-sentient creatures. Would they be capable of space travel? Interesting, but tough to wrap the mind around.
@justazim1 The world im living in with 20 and more major religions,196 different piece of land called countries,7 billion people,125 wars going on right now,1% of adults owns 43% planets wealth,Sadly every 6 seconds a child is dying in poverty in our planet this is suppose to be headline news not kim kardashian divorce and Justin biber has a dick or naa? this is statement of our society. I believe its much easier to deal with aliens rather greedy and blithering idiots..
@deanmullen10 Exactly I was thinking, I heard from many people saying, why are we sending radio signals and Let the aliens know we are here? How stupid question is that, because they scared and comparing to other humans in our planet, and Hollywood movies about aliens. Just because Hollywood wanna make money they cannot seed violent thought about aliens.I wish to travel speed of light and go far away from this confusing world...
A funny STORY-----one day i said to my brother "look there is something in my hand and its huge ,he says i cant see anything in your hand it is empty.then i told him again and he reply same.i test this on more people and they also give me same answer but i am 100% sure that there is something in my hand .now what do you think?am i a mad or supergenius?those who think i am mad they are ignoring stephen hawking.
has happened it has liquid water and it is about 2.4 times bigger than earth. the planet it 600 light years away. the planet is called "Kepler 22b". I really wanna see what is on the planet.
@MrLittleguy33 Yes, they have. Research it. They have no idea what's on the surface though there are some artist interpretations. That's our closest hope if something was to happen to Earth.
I couldn't imagine an advanced civilization invading us though, surly they'd know about the moral truth? without good morals a civilization wouldn't last, so surly they'd be smart enough to know what's right and wrong, like if I a mere human from a Type 0.7 civilization can know its wrong to invade a planet selfishly for exploitation surly they would know that too?
@deanmullen10 Exactly was I was thinking. And even if they don't recognize basic moral values as we know them, it doesn't make sense for them the go out of their way to destroy another species when at their level of technology they can harvest resources from uninhabited planets more easily then from our planet and terraform virtually any world to suit their ecological needs very quickly.
they could have evolved to a point of amorality or logical dictates that sats while we are ant like in comparison.. thru certain algorithmic calculations they see us eventually destroying ourselves or worse a valuanle solar sytem down the line... &will either make the decision to sterilize us or "adopt" us the way colonialists attempted to "civilise" the so called "savages" of past times... with very interesting results
@theblaquebaastid yes but I think the analogy of the ants breaks down after a certain point because human society has no memory even records (because it never happened) of humans been mere ants and suddenly becoming humans over a few 1000 years meanwhile alien society will have history of been a mere type 0.7 civilization.
They would have evolved more socially then we have therefore there treatment to us should be quantifiably more moral to our treatment towards ants.
@deanmullen10 Yes i understand where you're coming from in that sense but what if they see us as inferior in all ways and enslave us for physical tasks along with robotic worker drones to maximise resource gathering and then they destroy our cities and replace them with their arcitecture and and wipe us out after.....but on the other hand like you said they might be helpful and we might trade technologies and cultures and be galatic allies. i hope the second thing i said is correct lol
@deanmullen10 On Earth, only higher mammals exhibit emotions like empathy, pity, regret, etc. Thats a very, very tiny slice of all the species on Earth, an alien race may have no concept of morality, they may not see us as sentient, they could be a race of sociopaths who cooperate for mutual gain, they could be intensely xenophobic, they could have such large populations to support that they have no choice but to kill or be killed.
@AkamuSlayer Well isn't it having those emotions that makes an animal civilized in the first place? if they didn't have certain emotions they would have never become civilized and even if they had they wouldn't have lasted long enough. If they had no morality then they'd probably be killed already.
But to your second point I guess, only if they had interstellar travel (not galactic) and needed to reach a nearby planet in X amount of time and were within 20-30 light years then its possible.
@deanmullen10 Social insects like ants form complex social structures but they have no emotions, or even higher brain functions. They communicate chemically, and yet they can organise into massive, complex families of millions of individuals all cooperating to build complex hives. Imagine a race of technologically advanced hive animals who communicate with eachother only through chemical exchanges, and have no emotions. I think where anything is possible, we should prepare for the worst.
@AkamuSlayer that's a good realization, I never thought of that before, it is quite possible but I think the question is can something that works on a semi-macro level such as ants remain consistently functional in the macro world which is the size a species must almost certainly be to become a civilization.
it depends on where is the curiosity to explore perhaps in search for more food but is it enough to become civilized, that could be the definitive question. But I agree we must be prepared.
this is a silly thing to say, a alien culture will have their own set of morals to follow. you are expecting a distant civilization to follow human morals. Hell humans in the past did this daily to other human civilizations, why not aliens? What is right and wrong is subjective. A human mile away from you could have a totally different view on culture when compared to you. The same thing would apply to a distant alien civilization. Morality is not universal, not to humans, not to aliens.
@Collective122 Well if an alien civilization never stops believing in slavery and remains in superstitious middle ages beliefs, they'll never have a scientific revolution therefore probably wont even reach interstellar travel, probably not even space or air travel and if they did I'm sure what they would learn would force them to let go of old beliefs of science & morality.
If a civilization/society progresses oppression will fall eventually but the truth remains and will be discovered.
Look at the British empire.They were advanced in weapons and science,yet they killed native populations and occasionally enslaved them.They were advance but like the aliens in the video would still wage war for resources. The most powerful nations on Earth were founded on war and most advances came from war.(ex USA,Germany, Russia etc)
A war mongering civilization is not always rooted in superstitious beliefs. (British empire,USSR, Nazi Germany,Saddam Hussein regime,Fascist Italy,etc)
@Collective122 Well I agree with some of what you say I'm not a fundamentalist who holds an absolute belief, but I think its most probable that most alien civilizations will be morally advanced also its likely that the less morally advanced will be less scientifically advanced therefore they cold be over-powered by the majority of moral civilizations, so its less likely we'll contact with immoral civilizations as they are rarer and perhaps they are stopped by others before reaching us.
There is no such thing as a morally advanced civilization.What you consider morally right is evil to an other.Just like the British empire,they consider their acts justified by their morality. They were right in their own eyes in killing native people .They viewed themselves as a morally advanced while me, you and the natives saw them as evil doers in red.A alien civilization would be morally advanced by their own standards,not yours. The US is advanced and they exploit weak nations like others.
@Collective122 Actually if you read up on British history you'd notice that they held a lot of superstitious beliefs, along with Nazi Germany which toyed with a lot of superstitious beliefs.
@deanmullen10 I disagree.Every individual have different visions about whats right or wrong to do or say in different situation no matter how inteligent he is and what kind of technology he uses. Being more inteligent and working with high tech just make you feel more careless about other species.
@fusion01Cibank Yeah but what I'm trying to suggest is morality is part of social evolution, if a society fails to become compassionate and moral, it wont become advanced in the first place because war & chaos would have consumed them already, therefore social evolution follows that a civilization who has morality will survive, those w/o it or lacking it, will not survive.
@troubl3somez well that's a bit dramatizing, more than 99% of people have never killed anyone and never will. It's not like all humans go around with machine guns 24/7 blowing each other up and if we made alien contact we'd all go with guns blazing drooling out of our mouths while blowing them apart. I know our world has a lot of chaos but its not that bad, most people are civilized. But with billions of people, even a minority who kill looks like a lot.
@deanmullen10 lol, takes only a minority and the rest just not giving a shit to wipe out races. You think everyone was gunz blazing during the colonization of america? How did it turn out for the native americans?
@troubl3somez Yes but the majority were in favour of that and that's the situation for a primitive civilization, who is only crossing the oceans for the first time and has yet to have their scientific enlightenment and give up on social discrimination, alien civilizations that advanced would very probably be more scientifically hence technically hence ethically advanced than those of colombus' time.
@deanmullen10 fine how about the nazi germany? How did it turn out for the jews. If we even stand a chance of winning against the aliens we will fucking start a war just to get some resources or technologi from them. You seem to not know what we are capable of. Look at iraq usa situation. Think usa would give a shit about iraq if it didnt have the oil and shit?
@troubl3somez Well of course I understand that point, I just think its improbable that most civilizations will be destructive and I'm sure any civilization looking for resources would find it elsewhere than on a habitable planet and if they tried to be destructive, other civilizations would have probably stopped them by now. I guess it all depends on whether worm hole technology is possible. If it is, any destructive civilization could be stopped instantly.
@deanmullen10 Well we don't know what to expect what if there was a race a aliens like Frieza from DBZ and they had a planet trade thing going on? Might sound like fiction or like I watch to much tv but we don't know everything
@deanmullen10 Is self-preservation "wrong"? Furthermore could you define "right" also while we are on the subject? Even though you believe it to be counter-productive to act in such a way you benefit from such exploitation constantly, where do you think all the wealth accumulated in the west comes from? Love perhaps?
@deanmullen10 Is self-preservation "wrong"? Furthermore could you define "right" also while we are on the subject? Even though you believe it to be counter-productive to act in such a way you benefit from such exploitation constantly, where do you think all the wealth accumulated in the west comes from? Love perhaps?
@deanmullen10 But these would be creatures evolved completely seperate from ourselves, who is to say how and what they might think? Human morality is a concept, and I think it is hard to impose that on theoretical beings who are different in every single category.
@Ralroost yes but they surely would have morality similar to ours because morality & keeping order in society is the key to survival. I see social evolution as an inevitable consequence of a relatively intelligent species first becoming intelligent. Racism in another species would have fallen just like in ours because it is a logical/ethical lie to say that racism is acceptable and with time all lies shall be exposed unless society collapses before then. That's where I am basing my logic.
@deanmullen10 I dont think morality and keeping order are related. For example, mayans used human sacrifice to please their gods (in extreme cases babies), and at the same time they managed a fairly massive empire, and kept order. Then the spanish slaughtered them, it was considered moral at the time due to religion. My point is that morality seems to be completely subjective to the time/ group that defines it.
@Ralroost Yes but I'm talking about an advanced civilization that most probably would have abandoned superstitions. With technology there must be science behind it and with science will most surely come atheism and the fall of the religion, I'd say were seeing the fall of religion in this century for our civilization and my best bet is Modern Ethics are a byproduct of Technology and how it changed society & let ideas flow and technology is a byproduct of science which overthrows superstition.
@deanmullen10 Maybe science is positively correlated with the decline of religion, but ethics a product of technology? in the 1930s and 40's germany was the most advanced country in the world in terms of everything- and they went apeshit crazy. In my opinion, I think humans are still a slave to baser instincts- aggression being one of them. We have weaponized everything- why wouldnt another species evolve through 'survival of the fittest'
@Ralroost Well any case of immorality will lead to war, just as Nazi Germany were unethical, it led to World War II and inevitably their destruction of course there was a chance they could have won the war but in that case I believe a civil war would have inevitably followed or the nation would have become moral. I think Nazi Germany was just a freak nation that one would have never expected in an average civilization but because in this case one man had so much power and he was immoral too.
@deanmullen10 It seems as though morality does exist in many cases- though often only when applied to the ingroup. Group membership is a defining characteristic of humans (mammals?), and would also explain racism, dehumanization of the outgroup, etc. But what if these aliens evolved from something like an ant colony? Would an ant colony need morals?
@Myusernamerulez ik u werent expecting this but yes I do. I understand most people would be okay with it and that's your point but personally I'm passionate about fairness and treating other individuals (regardless of species) with respect.
But I assume your point is that most humans act superior to ants and care little for them. But the difference I see with aliens a million times ahead of us is that they would have once been at our level yet human civilization does not recall been at the...
@Myusernamerulez ... level of ants therefore they wouldn't be aware of that. I feel that although the difference between ants & humans could be the same as humans & aliens, I feel ethics/interactions work differently on different magnitudes even if the difference in advancement is the same. Just like the effects go gravity are different based on your size.
In other words I don't feel the analogy works as it seems because the fact is aliens would probably have a better ethics than humans.
@Myusernamerulez Well if a civilization was unethical, they'd probably collapse before they could reach interstellar space but even if they did most civilizations that make it would be ethical so they'd most likely have been stopped before reaching planets to invade.
Also if the majority of civilizations were unethical, then I'm sure they would have reached here or destroyed the universe by now and potentially destroy one another.
@Myusernamerulez for a species to have made it to stellar space travel would pretty much require it to be peaceful, since if it weren't they would have already killed themselvs off long time ago in the early stages.
We are already able to destroy whole continents during ww2 and we were lucky that it didnt happen.
We the human race already have enough power to destroy earth with war, with only a few hundred years of technology.
Some of these alien species might be millions of years ahead of us.
@llparasitell Our nukes are not THAT powerful but anyway everything you say is basically assuming that aliens would have to be extremely similar to us. You assume that the aliens would have our mentality. You're basing the whole idea of morality on the morality that we have made up. Think about ants for example; What if the aliens had the mentality of ants yet they are smart enough to construct spaceships. Just because a species doesn't destroy itself doesn't mean it will have a problem...
@Myusernamerulez That is true butwe are veiwing and assuming this from the most logical and reasonable standpoint, meaning its not likely their are aliens out their that could build interstellar space ships and have not invested in defense if not even weapons.
Building an interstellar space ship required mass amounts of energy, and if they can already harness that energy anything you do with it can be lethal, even focusing a fraction of that power into a very simple laser.
@Myusernamerulez if you do not under stand, all life will have to go through millions of years of "fittest of survival" Any life would have the same mentality as us always wanting to survive.
You cant compare an ant to alien because if alien could build shutters they would need a brain, or some sort of similar thinking and processing unit. And for any sort of brain like mutation to happen it requires more complex beings to mutate from.
...destroying another species. Ants are like that, hell, we're like that to an extent. You don't see a problem with stepping on a few ants at a picnic, now why would aliens who see us like ants have a problem doing the same to us and that's assuming they have our mentality. Now imagine if they had the mentality of a parasite or virus. Not good for us.
@Myusernamerulez .... its not to be takein literally of course the situation is not the same.
A species to have made it to stellar travel pretty much requires it to be peaceful, Other wise its technology would have killed it self off due to war.
But what I am trying to demonstrate is that the aliens are that much more advanced than us, they probably see life here and there growing everywhere, just like you would see many many ant hills, each ant hill represents a planet.
@Myusernamerulez lmao.. You are taking the metaphor that he used in LITERAL terms, I do not think you get his point.
If we were as small as ant hills to them, Them being maybe 100,000 years ahead of us or even 1million would be smart enough to rid of any war or violence, its pretty much impossible to have a violence based civilization, and to have them make it to a type 2 civilization?
You might have been watching too much scifi like starwars or star trek.
@deanmullen10 They may not be a civilization composed of biological life forms. they may be machines who, millions of years ago, were created by a civilization of biological organisms who either synthesised themselves with their technology and became mechanical or else the biological civilization dies out and the machines take over. machine intelligence is based entirely of allocation of memory and resources, so it would make sense to conquer.
@Mahmood42978 well yes I know that but if a civilization is to continue to progress they must continue to believe in this illusion. If a civilization gives up emotions & ethics we just go back to square one (I guess its evidence that life is tragically meaningless) but I think we should continue do live & do what's right simply because we can.
But if aliens gave up on that they wouldn't be capable of surviving long enough to travel the galaxy in my opinion.
@deanmullen10 Not necessarily; we evolved as the highest order of species on this planet because we debackled other species over for our beck and call. My point being there is nothing that precludes advancing into higher feats, It could be that we may kill ourselves off to the brink of extinction; but those few that had the aptitude to survive through such a ordeal, could be the ones who have the skills necessary to develop a higher order civilization
@Mahmood42978 well yes actually I have to see the logic there. That isn't the likeliest outcome but nevertheless it is a possibility. I agree with you on that but I believe most civilizations that survive will become civilized and ethical. Also if most are ethical they can easily outnumber and halt the rise of the minority of unethical civilizations.
I hope we make contact and learn about aliens within my life time, I'd love to study the history of alien civilizations, it would create a frenzy, a revolution in thought, knowledge and history itself would become renewed. It'd be truly amazing.
Strictly and joyfully agreed. Besides more advancement means less fear and less religion to hold mind, spirit, knowledge, education, civilization levels and technology back. Our entire fearful and violent past as human race would be enlightenet away forever.
@deanmullen10 İ'd love to study their ancient starships,weapons and their old wars.İ hope they will contact us in peaceful matters,so we can all learn these stuff
So are we going to be the invaders going to planet to planet taking and using what ever we can. if so would the only thing we would compete for is territory and resource against other advanced races?
no offence to Stephen but he has the most retarded face but then he makes up for it by being the smartest guy in the world and apparently hes a genius and smarter then me and im pretty stoopid
Or as Carl Sagan said-"Maybe we're the first. Some species has to be first to emerge in the history of the galaxy". It's possible we are that first species ever to reach this level of intelligence and technology. And the reason we for see and fear the scenario of being invaded and exterminated by others is because that is exactly what we have always done TO others.
why are we so pecamistic about alien contact, if they are in any way similar in historical sence to us they would have a deep morality culture and understand the that wipping out star system and civilisations would be the biggest attrocity a culture could perform. its the equivilent of saying that if we could we would harvest all the rainforests at ounce, drain the oceans dry and hollow out the planet we just wouldnt because sentient life has morrals even if they are aggresive.
this is random, but if there's aliens, i think it would be funny if they were really dumb, and we found them :D haha. everyone thinks they are sooooo intelligent.
Seems this pathetic Stephen Hawkings is nothing more than the new front farse Papal puppet for the Vatican like their other puppet who was a dunce, Albert Einstein. Used of course to help destroy the Bible tied in with Evolution. The Church of Rome wishes you to be uneducated and certainly not following the Bible which they want destroyed once and for all in order to reign in their despotic one world Godless tyranny. Please don't fall for false fronts like Stephen Hawkings and Einstein.
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
@FCVALCLJJC did you watch the segment in the movie "the right stuff" when the nasa guys are telling the aborigines in australia about the spacecraft orbiting above them? This has happened all ready more than ounce.
Why would someone dislike it!
MrTurnermason 16 hours ago
the humans do develope and some day we develope to live on other planets and maybe those that live on that planet get a power that helps them live on that planet like lifting stuff whit your minde like in star wars or somethong else
mroverkill135 1 day ago
Interesting, especially looking at it from the other side of the coin. We going out to other worlds so that if something, I mean when, to the Sun, humans won't disappear.
ProperLogicalDebate 2 days ago
Excellent video.
KennyReddwooddforest 4 days ago
The implications of Multiversal morality is huge. It could mean anything from civilizations committing civilization-wide suicide, to ignoring the rest of the Universe and staying in their own paradise, I mean with an infinite multiverse, what is right and what is wrong? if there as an infinite number of civilizations, doing anything is pointless cause we can't effect something on an infinite scale with finite actions? o.O
deanmullen10 5 days ago
@deanmullen10 To the eternal universe any action is without any evaluation. But we are here and we live. We live therefore we plan actions. When we plan actions we have to plan them according to ethics if we want to stay on the right path or even get on the right path. We all are made up of cells which are little animals. All those animals want to live. So we love them. Then we are on the right path. We plan the future out of love. Any loving activity like creating art makes more love.
KennyReddwooddforest 4 days ago
@KennyReddwooddforest yeah, I figure we should worry about finite issues not infinite issues as we are finite beings, perhaps there are just some things beyond us that we simply shouldn't worry about.
deanmullen10 4 days ago
@deanmullen10 Yes, we don't have to worry about the things that have not been detected yet. However we can explore the universe, the brain, and dive much deeper into knowledge than ever before without worrying. Just for fun. I am for never closing the door to the unknown. Information is endless. I do not believe that the Earthlings and that includes animals as well as humans, are finite at all. Humans used to believe that thunder was created by gods. Today we know what it is.
KennyReddwooddforest 3 days ago
@KennyReddwooddforest We know today that thunder is caused by electricity in the atmosphere. Same with the belief that we have to all die one day. The research in nano technology reveals to us today that we will in around 20 years from now be able to reverse the ageing process and be able to live indefinitely. Check out Dr. Ray Kurzweil's work. Many things which humans believed to be true have been revised later on. Knowledge is in constant flow.
KennyReddwooddforest 3 days ago
theres got to be more, send me link of the complete episode if there is one.
BlackOpAim 1 week ago
@BlackOpAim Its all on netflix too.
DerpinWin 1 week ago
Intelligent life. We are not exactly intelligent.
RosbifFrog 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
This is soooo boooring ...!
Look up the sky at night...i see more cool things happening :)
cerveauxelectriques 2 weeks ago
Very bad episode of "The outer limits" ! This is crap ! :)
cerveauxelectriques 2 weeks ago
i'd punch the fuck out of a alien.
jsharps1000 2 weeks ago
Call us 1-800Human lol
mike12345684 3 weeks ago
We could never live amongst each other as we cant even accept each other's differances, ie race religion.
258Dellboy 3 weeks ago
The time when we meet with the Alien is the time where Christianity and Islam are GONE FOREVER .
AsianBrotherhood1781 3 weeks ago
If an advanced civilization is coming our way, they would probably treat our planet like an experimental guinea pig. Harvesting not only natural resources but elements new to them. Look at it this way, our political leaders know right from wrong and continue to deliberately look out for themselves. They understand that humans aren't striving in dominant species but excessive population. You only need a couple million to start all over, to explore the world and eventually the universe.
vilane421 3 weeks ago
If aliens did attack our planet, I'm sure we'd launch nuclear bombs at their spacecraft.
SamGaming 3 weeks ago
@SamGaming they would prevent us from firing anything and pretty shut our power suply down before we even knew it
Knowing recently that we can already cloak microscopic particles invisible with only a few hundred years of science
Any alien that could reach us would 100% be cloaked and undetectable.
We can already begin to render matter invisible at a micro scopic level, theres no reason why visitors wouldnt be cloaked, they would be posibly tens of thousands of years head of us if not milions.
llparasitell 2 weeks ago
I'm seeing a lot of talk about hoping aliens have morals (to say there are some). America invades and exploits countries on our own planet so what would stop aliens doing the same?
SamGaming 3 weeks ago
come in peace, then kick their ass. Human style
francisalec 3 weeks ago
where can I get the full documentary ? could anyone be kind and send it to me :)
Greev84 1 month ago
Lol maybe what makes them immortal is Protandim...
TheWebMan2010 1 month ago
Stephen probably is not right here. Well if the aliens want our planet then they must defeat our atomic weapons. And I think they don't want to do it because if we see that we can't win we would blast this planet and take aliens with us.
Simply not worth to touch us from that history point when the atomic weapons were developed.
RemusLt 1 month ago
@RemusLt They could probably disable our nukes........
shawn3213 1 month ago
@shawn3213 we have not only nukes (they can disable electronics but some mini nuke versions don't use electronics) but biological weapons also and some pretty effective ones. This is no win no win situation in any case.
And also I believe that some kind of virus is also lethal for them as is for us.
If just they would be some sort of machine based civilization then it would be harder to defeat them but still possible. They can also nuke us from the cosmos.
RemusLt 1 month ago
@shawn3213 But I believe there is some kind of rules that they can't do this and they prefer to keep a distance from any developing civilization.
RemusLt 1 month ago
why does it seem that the ships exiting the wormhole are different than those that entered the wormhole? what the hell is going on!? I can't take it!
vinbuik 1 month ago
people have no idea whats REALLY going on here
m44ever 1 month ago
Imagine we are the one invading other planet that holds life.
x3iDREAM 2 months ago
All we have to go on, as far as other intelligent civilization is concerned, is our own. I don't think that makes it invalid, just limited. We have nothing concrete about other moral systems, other evolutionary results, etc. It's just a crapshoot that produces some fascinating ideas, like hiveminds, and intelligent but non-sentient creatures. Would they be capable of space travel? Interesting, but tough to wrap the mind around.
dunnono00 2 months ago
Maybe they can teleport me to Megan Fox's bedroom.
szrij1234 2 months ago
we need to build moon bases and mars bases
and large ships to get oueselves going job securirty!
end the recession
mokshaw 2 months ago
@justazim1 The world im living in with 20 and more major religions,196 different piece of land called countries,7 billion people,125 wars going on right now,1% of adults owns 43% planets wealth,Sadly every 6 seconds a child is dying in poverty in our planet this is suppose to be headline news not kim kardashian divorce and Justin biber has a dick or naa? this is statement of our society. I believe its much easier to deal with aliens rather greedy and blithering idiots..
vijayanand875 2 months ago
@deanmullen10 Exactly I was thinking, I heard from many people saying, why are we sending radio signals and Let the aliens know we are here? How stupid question is that, because they scared and comparing to other humans in our planet, and Hollywood movies about aliens. Just because Hollywood wanna make money they cannot seed violent thought about aliens.I wish to travel speed of light and go far away from this confusing world...
vijayanand875 2 months ago
@vijayanand875 u won't even know how confusing the world outside this world ..
justazim1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A funny STORY-----one day i said to my brother "look there is something in my hand and its huge ,he says i cant see anything in your hand it is empty.then i told him again and he reply same.i test this on more people and they also give me same answer but i am 100% sure that there is something in my hand .now what do you think?am i a mad or supergenius?those who think i am mad they are ignoring stephen hawking.
PARAG152 2 months ago
this is epic
cory9399 2 months ago
has happened it has liquid water and it is about 2.4 times bigger than earth. the planet it 600 light years away. the planet is called "Kepler 22b". I really wanna see what is on the planet.
TheGardnersrock 2 months ago
@TheGardnersrock
Did they actually discover such a planet already?
MrLittleguy33 2 months ago
@MrLittleguy33 Yes, they have. Research it. They have no idea what's on the surface though there are some artist interpretations. That's our closest hope if something was to happen to Earth.
WorldPhoenix1 2 months ago
today they found a planet that could substain life. much like our earth the green house effect has haplent it
TheGardnersrock 2 months ago
I couldn't imagine an advanced civilization invading us though, surly they'd know about the moral truth? without good morals a civilization wouldn't last, so surly they'd be smart enough to know what's right and wrong, like if I a mere human from a Type 0.7 civilization can know its wrong to invade a planet selfishly for exploitation surly they would know that too?
deanmullen10 2 months ago 10
@deanmullen10 Exactly was I was thinking. And even if they don't recognize basic moral values as we know them, it doesn't make sense for them the go out of their way to destroy another species when at their level of technology they can harvest resources from uninhabited planets more easily then from our planet and terraform virtually any world to suit their ecological needs very quickly.
mongorians22 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
@deanmullen10 exactly !! we have humanity and they should have alienity ..
justazim1 2 months ago
@deanmullen10 5:24 - 5:36 says it all really
they could have evolved to a point of amorality or logical dictates that sats while we are ant like in comparison.. thru certain algorithmic calculations they see us eventually destroying ourselves or worse a valuanle solar sytem down the line... &will either make the decision to sterilize us or "adopt" us the way colonialists attempted to "civilise" the so called "savages" of past times... with very interesting results
theblaquebaastid 2 months ago
@theblaquebaastid yes but I think the analogy of the ants breaks down after a certain point because human society has no memory even records (because it never happened) of humans been mere ants and suddenly becoming humans over a few 1000 years meanwhile alien society will have history of been a mere type 0.7 civilization.
They would have evolved more socially then we have therefore there treatment to us should be quantifiably more moral to our treatment towards ants.
deanmullen10 2 months ago
@deanmullen10 Yes i understand where you're coming from in that sense but what if they see us as inferior in all ways and enslave us for physical tasks along with robotic worker drones to maximise resource gathering and then they destroy our cities and replace them with their arcitecture and and wipe us out after.....but on the other hand like you said they might be helpful and we might trade technologies and cultures and be galatic allies. i hope the second thing i said is correct lol
connorhobson1 2 months ago
@deanmullen10 On Earth, only higher mammals exhibit emotions like empathy, pity, regret, etc. Thats a very, very tiny slice of all the species on Earth, an alien race may have no concept of morality, they may not see us as sentient, they could be a race of sociopaths who cooperate for mutual gain, they could be intensely xenophobic, they could have such large populations to support that they have no choice but to kill or be killed.
AkamuSlayer 2 months ago
@AkamuSlayer Well isn't it having those emotions that makes an animal civilized in the first place? if they didn't have certain emotions they would have never become civilized and even if they had they wouldn't have lasted long enough. If they had no morality then they'd probably be killed already.
But to your second point I guess, only if they had interstellar travel (not galactic) and needed to reach a nearby planet in X amount of time and were within 20-30 light years then its possible.
deanmullen10 2 months ago
@deanmullen10 Social insects like ants form complex social structures but they have no emotions, or even higher brain functions. They communicate chemically, and yet they can organise into massive, complex families of millions of individuals all cooperating to build complex hives. Imagine a race of technologically advanced hive animals who communicate with eachother only through chemical exchanges, and have no emotions. I think where anything is possible, we should prepare for the worst.
AkamuSlayer 2 months ago
@AkamuSlayer that's a good realization, I never thought of that before, it is quite possible but I think the question is can something that works on a semi-macro level such as ants remain consistently functional in the macro world which is the size a species must almost certainly be to become a civilization.
it depends on where is the curiosity to explore perhaps in search for more food but is it enough to become civilized, that could be the definitive question. But I agree we must be prepared.
deanmullen10 2 months ago
this is a silly thing to say, a alien culture will have their own set of morals to follow. you are expecting a distant civilization to follow human morals. Hell humans in the past did this daily to other human civilizations, why not aliens? What is right and wrong is subjective. A human mile away from you could have a totally different view on culture when compared to you. The same thing would apply to a distant alien civilization. Morality is not universal, not to humans, not to aliens.
Collective122 2 months ago
@Collective122 Well if an alien civilization never stops believing in slavery and remains in superstitious middle ages beliefs, they'll never have a scientific revolution therefore probably wont even reach interstellar travel, probably not even space or air travel and if they did I'm sure what they would learn would force them to let go of old beliefs of science & morality.
If a civilization/society progresses oppression will fall eventually but the truth remains and will be discovered.
deanmullen10 2 months ago
Look at the British empire.They were advanced in weapons and science,yet they killed native populations and occasionally enslaved them.They were advance but like the aliens in the video would still wage war for resources. The most powerful nations on Earth were founded on war and most advances came from war.(ex USA,Germany, Russia etc)
A war mongering civilization is not always rooted in superstitious beliefs. (British empire,USSR, Nazi Germany,Saddam Hussein regime,Fascist Italy,etc)
Collective122 2 months ago
@Collective122 Well I agree with some of what you say I'm not a fundamentalist who holds an absolute belief, but I think its most probable that most alien civilizations will be morally advanced also its likely that the less morally advanced will be less scientifically advanced therefore they cold be over-powered by the majority of moral civilizations, so its less likely we'll contact with immoral civilizations as they are rarer and perhaps they are stopped by others before reaching us.
deanmullen10 2 months ago
There is no such thing as a morally advanced civilization.What you consider morally right is evil to an other.Just like the British empire,they consider their acts justified by their morality. They were right in their own eyes in killing native people .They viewed themselves as a morally advanced while me, you and the natives saw them as evil doers in red.A alien civilization would be morally advanced by their own standards,not yours. The US is advanced and they exploit weak nations like others.
Collective122 2 months ago
@Collective122 Actually if you read up on British history you'd notice that they held a lot of superstitious beliefs, along with Nazi Germany which toyed with a lot of superstitious beliefs.
ShattockIan 1 month ago
@deanmullen10 not necessarily, this assumes they think like us at all.
Kraktzor 2 months ago
@deanmullen10 I disagree.Every individual have different visions about whats right or wrong to do or say in different situation no matter how inteligent he is and what kind of technology he uses. Being more inteligent and working with high tech just make you feel more careless about other species.
fusion01Cibank 1 month ago
@fusion01Cibank Yeah but what I'm trying to suggest is morality is part of social evolution, if a society fails to become compassionate and moral, it wont become advanced in the first place because war & chaos would have consumed them already, therefore social evolution follows that a civilization who has morality will survive, those w/o it or lacking it, will not survive.
deanmullen10 1 month ago
@deanmullen10 we are fucking destroying eachother as we speek.. do you think we would give a shit about the aliens?
troubl3somez 1 month ago
@troubl3somez well that's a bit dramatizing, more than 99% of people have never killed anyone and never will. It's not like all humans go around with machine guns 24/7 blowing each other up and if we made alien contact we'd all go with guns blazing drooling out of our mouths while blowing them apart. I know our world has a lot of chaos but its not that bad, most people are civilized. But with billions of people, even a minority who kill looks like a lot.
deanmullen10 1 month ago
@deanmullen10 lol, takes only a minority and the rest just not giving a shit to wipe out races. You think everyone was gunz blazing during the colonization of america? How did it turn out for the native americans?
troubl3somez 1 month ago
@troubl3somez Yes but the majority were in favour of that and that's the situation for a primitive civilization, who is only crossing the oceans for the first time and has yet to have their scientific enlightenment and give up on social discrimination, alien civilizations that advanced would very probably be more scientifically hence technically hence ethically advanced than those of colombus' time.
deanmullen10 1 month ago
@deanmullen10 fine how about the nazi germany? How did it turn out for the jews. If we even stand a chance of winning against the aliens we will fucking start a war just to get some resources or technologi from them. You seem to not know what we are capable of. Look at iraq usa situation. Think usa would give a shit about iraq if it didnt have the oil and shit?
troubl3somez 1 month ago
@troubl3somez Well of course I understand that point, I just think its improbable that most civilizations will be destructive and I'm sure any civilization looking for resources would find it elsewhere than on a habitable planet and if they tried to be destructive, other civilizations would have probably stopped them by now. I guess it all depends on whether worm hole technology is possible. If it is, any destructive civilization could be stopped instantly.
deanmullen10 1 month ago
@troubl3somez Wow..you are not that bright.
AgrivatedKillah 1 month ago
@deanmullen10 Well we don't know what to expect what if there was a race a aliens like Frieza from DBZ and they had a planet trade thing going on? Might sound like fiction or like I watch to much tv but we don't know everything
SuperBabyMario0C 1 month ago
@deanmullen10 If the didn't destroy themselves, would they be hostile to humans?
TheWebMan2010 1 month ago
Comment removed
ShattockIan 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@deanmullen10 Is self-preservation "wrong"? Furthermore could you define "right" also while we are on the subject? Even though you believe it to be counter-productive to act in such a way you benefit from such exploitation constantly, where do you think all the wealth accumulated in the west comes from? Love perhaps?
ShattockIan 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@deanmullen10 Is self-preservation "wrong"? Furthermore could you define "right" also while we are on the subject? Even though you believe it to be counter-productive to act in such a way you benefit from such exploitation constantly, where do you think all the wealth accumulated in the west comes from? Love perhaps?
ShattockIan 1 month ago
@deanmullen10 But these would be creatures evolved completely seperate from ourselves, who is to say how and what they might think? Human morality is a concept, and I think it is hard to impose that on theoretical beings who are different in every single category.
Ralroost 3 weeks ago
@Ralroost yes but they surely would have morality similar to ours because morality & keeping order in society is the key to survival. I see social evolution as an inevitable consequence of a relatively intelligent species first becoming intelligent. Racism in another species would have fallen just like in ours because it is a logical/ethical lie to say that racism is acceptable and with time all lies shall be exposed unless society collapses before then. That's where I am basing my logic.
deanmullen10 3 weeks ago
@deanmullen10 I dont think morality and keeping order are related. For example, mayans used human sacrifice to please their gods (in extreme cases babies), and at the same time they managed a fairly massive empire, and kept order. Then the spanish slaughtered them, it was considered moral at the time due to religion. My point is that morality seems to be completely subjective to the time/ group that defines it.
Ralroost 3 weeks ago
@Ralroost Yes but I'm talking about an advanced civilization that most probably would have abandoned superstitions. With technology there must be science behind it and with science will most surely come atheism and the fall of the religion, I'd say were seeing the fall of religion in this century for our civilization and my best bet is Modern Ethics are a byproduct of Technology and how it changed society & let ideas flow and technology is a byproduct of science which overthrows superstition.
deanmullen10 3 weeks ago
@deanmullen10 Maybe science is positively correlated with the decline of religion, but ethics a product of technology? in the 1930s and 40's germany was the most advanced country in the world in terms of everything- and they went apeshit crazy. In my opinion, I think humans are still a slave to baser instincts- aggression being one of them. We have weaponized everything- why wouldnt another species evolve through 'survival of the fittest'
Ralroost 3 weeks ago
@Ralroost Well any case of immorality will lead to war, just as Nazi Germany were unethical, it led to World War II and inevitably their destruction of course there was a chance they could have won the war but in that case I believe a civil war would have inevitably followed or the nation would have become moral. I think Nazi Germany was just a freak nation that one would have never expected in an average civilization but because in this case one man had so much power and he was immoral too.
deanmullen10 3 weeks ago
@deanmullen10 It seems as though morality does exist in many cases- though often only when applied to the ingroup. Group membership is a defining characteristic of humans (mammals?), and would also explain racism, dehumanization of the outgroup, etc. But what if these aliens evolved from something like an ant colony? Would an ant colony need morals?
Ralroost 3 weeks ago
@deanmullen10
Do you think it's wrong to step on an ant hill at a picnic party?
Myusernamerulez 3 weeks ago
@Myusernamerulez ik u werent expecting this but yes I do. I understand most people would be okay with it and that's your point but personally I'm passionate about fairness and treating other individuals (regardless of species) with respect.
But I assume your point is that most humans act superior to ants and care little for them. But the difference I see with aliens a million times ahead of us is that they would have once been at our level yet human civilization does not recall been at the...
deanmullen10 3 weeks ago
@Myusernamerulez ... level of ants therefore they wouldn't be aware of that. I feel that although the difference between ants & humans could be the same as humans & aliens, I feel ethics/interactions work differently on different magnitudes even if the difference in advancement is the same. Just like the effects go gravity are different based on your size.
In other words I don't feel the analogy works as it seems because the fact is aliens would probably have a better ethics than humans.
deanmullen10 3 weeks ago
@deanmullen10
Does a praying mantis have better ethics than an ant?
Myusernamerulez 2 weeks ago
@Myusernamerulez Well if a civilization was unethical, they'd probably collapse before they could reach interstellar space but even if they did most civilizations that make it would be ethical so they'd most likely have been stopped before reaching planets to invade.
Also if the majority of civilizations were unethical, then I'm sure they would have reached here or destroyed the universe by now and potentially destroy one another.
deanmullen10 2 weeks ago
@Myusernamerulez for a species to have made it to stellar space travel would pretty much require it to be peaceful, since if it weren't they would have already killed themselvs off long time ago in the early stages.
We are already able to destroy whole continents during ww2 and we were lucky that it didnt happen.
We the human race already have enough power to destroy earth with war, with only a few hundred years of technology.
Some of these alien species might be millions of years ahead of us.
llparasitell 2 weeks ago
@llparasitell Our nukes are not THAT powerful but anyway everything you say is basically assuming that aliens would have to be extremely similar to us. You assume that the aliens would have our mentality. You're basing the whole idea of morality on the morality that we have made up. Think about ants for example; What if the aliens had the mentality of ants yet they are smart enough to construct spaceships. Just because a species doesn't destroy itself doesn't mean it will have a problem...
Myusernamerulez 2 weeks ago
@Myusernamerulez That is true butwe are veiwing and assuming this from the most logical and reasonable standpoint, meaning its not likely their are aliens out their that could build interstellar space ships and have not invested in defense if not even weapons.
Building an interstellar space ship required mass amounts of energy, and if they can already harness that energy anything you do with it can be lethal, even focusing a fraction of that power into a very simple laser.
Carbosful 2 weeks ago
@Myusernamerulez if you do not under stand, all life will have to go through millions of years of "fittest of survival" Any life would have the same mentality as us always wanting to survive.
You cant compare an ant to alien because if alien could build shutters they would need a brain, or some sort of similar thinking and processing unit. And for any sort of brain like mutation to happen it requires more complex beings to mutate from.
Carbosful 2 weeks ago
@llparasitell
...destroying another species. Ants are like that, hell, we're like that to an extent. You don't see a problem with stepping on a few ants at a picnic, now why would aliens who see us like ants have a problem doing the same to us and that's assuming they have our mentality. Now imagine if they had the mentality of a parasite or virus. Not good for us.
Myusernamerulez 2 weeks ago
@Myusernamerulez .... its not to be takein literally of course the situation is not the same.
A species to have made it to stellar travel pretty much requires it to be peaceful, Other wise its technology would have killed it self off due to war.
But what I am trying to demonstrate is that the aliens are that much more advanced than us, they probably see life here and there growing everywhere, just like you would see many many ant hills, each ant hill represents a planet.
Do you get this now ?
llparasitell 2 weeks ago
@Myusernamerulez lmao.. You are taking the metaphor that he used in LITERAL terms, I do not think you get his point.
If we were as small as ant hills to them, Them being maybe 100,000 years ahead of us or even 1million would be smart enough to rid of any war or violence, its pretty much impossible to have a violence based civilization, and to have them make it to a type 2 civilization?
You might have been watching too much scifi like starwars or star trek.
Carbosful 2 weeks ago
@deanmullen10 They may not be a civilization composed of biological life forms. they may be machines who, millions of years ago, were created by a civilization of biological organisms who either synthesised themselves with their technology and became mechanical or else the biological civilization dies out and the machines take over. machine intelligence is based entirely of allocation of memory and resources, so it would make sense to conquer.
MuonRay 2 weeks ago
@deanmullen10 right and wrong are merely illusory concepts of humans if we know that, they'll know that too >:)
Mahmood42978 2 weeks ago
@Mahmood42978 well yes I know that but if a civilization is to continue to progress they must continue to believe in this illusion. If a civilization gives up emotions & ethics we just go back to square one (I guess its evidence that life is tragically meaningless) but I think we should continue do live & do what's right simply because we can.
But if aliens gave up on that they wouldn't be capable of surviving long enough to travel the galaxy in my opinion.
deanmullen10 2 weeks ago
@deanmullen10 Not necessarily; we evolved as the highest order of species on this planet because we debackled other species over for our beck and call. My point being there is nothing that precludes advancing into higher feats, It could be that we may kill ourselves off to the brink of extinction; but those few that had the aptitude to survive through such a ordeal, could be the ones who have the skills necessary to develop a higher order civilization
Mahmood42978 2 weeks ago
@Mahmood42978 well yes actually I have to see the logic there. That isn't the likeliest outcome but nevertheless it is a possibility. I agree with you on that but I believe most civilizations that survive will become civilized and ethical. Also if most are ethical they can easily outnumber and halt the rise of the minority of unethical civilizations.
deanmullen10 2 weeks ago
@deanmullen10 not likely? It's how we got where we are now. Humans are the only species that have members who kill for pleasure.
Mahmood42978 2 weeks ago
I hope we make contact and learn about aliens within my life time, I'd love to study the history of alien civilizations, it would create a frenzy, a revolution in thought, knowledge and history itself would become renewed. It'd be truly amazing.
deanmullen10 2 months ago 13
@deanmullen10
Strictly and joyfully agreed. Besides more advancement means less fear and less religion to hold mind, spirit, knowledge, education, civilization levels and technology back. Our entire fearful and violent past as human race would be enlightenet away forever.
MrLittleguy33 2 months ago
@deanmullen10 İ'd love to study their ancient starships,weapons and their old wars.İ hope they will contact us in peaceful matters,so we can all learn these stuff
IsengardMordor 1 month ago
@deanmullen10 Maybe they do not use radio frequencies so therefore we cannot contact them?
TheWebMan2010 1 month ago
@deanmullen10 Assuming, of course, that you'd be able to understand them.
BeachofDreams 1 month ago
Why would such an 'intelligent' video add sounds to the spaceships flying...
ItsDorp 3 months ago
@ItsDorp They don't know about sound and space I guess.
61miroman 2 months ago
might,may ,should be,imagine,might,if,who knows? perhaps, ..............i only found this type of word.
PARAG152 3 months ago
Human is the most advanced creation in the universe and scientist never found anything outside the planet
PARAG152 3 months ago
@PARAG152 Our sapience is the only most advanced thing on this planet. Other animals are superior in every other way. Also we're not a creation.
Helge129 3 months ago
@PARAG152 no way ..
justazim1 2 months ago
So are we going to be the invaders going to planet to planet taking and using what ever we can. if so would the only thing we would compete for is territory and resource against other advanced races?
chrisblaster18 3 months ago
no offence to Stephen but he has the most retarded face but then he makes up for it by being the smartest guy in the world and apparently hes a genius and smarter then me and im pretty stoopid
dat1guywitdat1name 3 months ago
What if aliens were humans too?
you never know
NevaSayNoToPanda 3 months ago
@NevaSayNoToPanda aliens can be humans also , or any other species .. unless ur talking about ET (aliens + technology)
Atheist961 3 months ago
Or as Carl Sagan said-"Maybe we're the first. Some species has to be first to emerge in the history of the galaxy". It's possible we are that first species ever to reach this level of intelligence and technology. And the reason we for see and fear the scenario of being invaded and exterminated by others is because that is exactly what we have always done TO others.
darrenholcomb42 3 months ago
why are we so pecamistic about alien contact, if they are in any way similar in historical sence to us they would have a deep morality culture and understand the that wipping out star system and civilisations would be the biggest attrocity a culture could perform. its the equivilent of saying that if we could we would harvest all the rainforests at ounce, drain the oceans dry and hollow out the planet we just wouldnt because sentient life has morrals even if they are aggresive.
atomiczombie101 4 months ago
this is random, but if there's aliens, i think it would be funny if they were really dumb, and we found them :D haha. everyone thinks they are sooooo intelligent.
22cannon22 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Seems this pathetic Stephen Hawkings is nothing more than the new front farse Papal puppet for the Vatican like their other puppet who was a dunce, Albert Einstein. Used of course to help destroy the Bible tied in with Evolution. The Church of Rome wishes you to be uneducated and certainly not following the Bible which they want destroyed once and for all in order to reign in their despotic one world Godless tyranny. Please don't fall for false fronts like Stephen Hawkings and Einstein.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
they could also eat the energy from the sun or have genetically engineered themselfs too feed from sunlight.
With some luck they wouldnt want to eat us
TheGoatherdGod 5 months ago
2:30 okay it doesnt have to be like independence day it could just as easily be like star trek
daraleekmyballz 5 months ago
2:30 okay it doesnt have to be like independence day it could just as easily be like star trek
daraleekmyballz 5 months ago
Would not that mirror melt by the Sun?
levlevi 5 months ago
@levlevi Yes. If not, the gravitational forces exerted by the sun will swallow the mirrors. However i think it was just demonstrating an idea.
liamailiam 5 months ago in playlist Videos from WeAreStarStuff51
send back the same "wow" signal to the direction it came from , simpleWSL.
agravating1 5 months ago
@agravating1 it will take 200 years to arrive and if it arrives they may have destroyed themself.
WoWrocks3388 5 months ago
4:00 goku's spirit bomb
dillon4321 6 months ago
@dillon4321 lol
daraleekmyballz 5 months ago
I have been watching these videos for the past 2 hours, and it has felt like mere minutes. Time travel? :P
MrRyRino 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (DONATED) FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 6 months ago
steven hawking would have made for an interesting science FICTION writer.
Zurround100 7 months ago
0:25
Battle: Los Angeles
Aseeb36 7 months ago
maybe stephen hawking had met them ,,
with my all respect to him .. It' seem to me such a far imagination
MymindW 8 months ago
"... but if you think about it logically, alien technology should be as extraordinary to us as a rocket ship to a caveman... "
srsly?... but if you think about it logically, caveman... rocket ship?.. logical?
FCVALCLJJC 11 months ago
@FCVALCLJJC did you watch the segment in the movie "the right stuff" when the nasa guys are telling the aborigines in australia about the spacecraft orbiting above them? This has happened all ready more than ounce.
wondergundy 6 months ago
@FCVALCLJJC exactly, their technology would make absolutely no sense to us
BringerOfD 6 months ago
I watched War of the worlds this evening. Aliens tried to take over and colonise earth. Let's just hope if aliens do come, they will come in peace!
SuperStarlight777 11 months ago