The well known American moon hoax member Buzz Aldrin is a theorist. He assumes(and according to his theory we have to assume)that the Soviets had the ability to track Apollo..despite the fact these long ago extinct Soviet idiots couldn't spot a plane over Moscow even a whole 20 years after the time of the Apollo moon hoax/film/crime/fraud,or whatever you call it,of 1969 on which the theorist villain Aldrin played a center role.
I like to think the astronauts thought: "Fuck! I travel 250,000 miles and I got to dig some ditches? Hell, I would have rather stayed home and dug myself a pool."
"God damn scientists want their rocks. Come here and get it yourself you lazy bastards. And I use to think it was a pain in the ass when my wife sent me to the store for milk. "
"Momma use to bitch at me for playing in the dirt as a kid. Well mom, look at me now. Bit sorry you hit me with a belt when I tracked dirt in ain't ya?"
I understand you all, there nothing pecuilar .... but why all the acting surprising like they playing up for the camera ...this is how rumours start on the fake moon landing
@THREESIXNINE100 OK, so they have walked over there some minutes ago. What about it? Maybe they just went back to the Rover to pick up the shovel. Nothing peculiar with this video at all.
The suits are covered with dust it would be brought back in the lem with them. The dust is radioactive and should not be breathed in. How did they avoid breathing in the dust back in the lem? You cant breathe in ionizing radiated lunar dust and not get radiation poisoning.
@idlebrainidol Well, I've read quite a lot about lunar dust, but the hazards mentioned are the sharp, may be even toxic particles, not any big amount of radiation. It's even proposed to use lunar soil as radiation protection for Moon colonies. So, I don't think that the astronauts risked more damage to their lungs when removing their helmets inside the LEM, than on many places on Earth, where there is for example uranium and other radioactive materials in the soil.
@idlebrainidol All right, show me to a source that says the lunar dust is dangerousely radioactive. A scientifical source, not on Youtube or a hoax-promoting site, please. Because I have found sources saying the dust can be abrasive and chemically active, but nothing about radioactive.
Here on Earth, the "dirty" spacesuits were examined and one scientist got an allergic reaction from the dust, but nothing is said about any radiation hazard.
@YDDES Lunar dust is often contaminated by UV radiation and high iron content, making it detrimental to the human body. When it gets in the eyes or lungs, it can cause a potentially harmful chemical reaction. Lunar dust also has a unique configuration of small, fine particles with extremely sharp edges that can be dangerous when inhaled.
@YDDES Also, because lunar dust has an electrostatic charge, it can cling to any surface with which it comes in contact, making it particularly difficult to remove from surfaces like spacesuits, spacecraft, and equipment.
@YDDES There are concerns that the dust found on the lunar surface could cause harmful effects on any manned outpost technology and crew members: * Abrasive nature of the dust particles may rub and wear down surfaces through friction; * Negative effect on coatings used on gaskets to seal equipment from space, optical lenses that include solar panels and windows as well as wiring; * Possible damage to an astronaut's lungs, nervous, and cardiovascular systems.
@YDDES The surface of the Moon is baldly exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares, and some of that radiation is very hard to stop with shielding. Furthermore, when cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous spray of secondary particles right at your feet. All this radiation penetrating human flesh can damage DNA, boosting the risk of cancer and other maladies.
@idlebrainidol I know of all those potential problems with the lunar dust, but still no information that the dust brought into the LEM's was lethally radioactive. The cosmic rays didn't penetrate the hull of the LEM's to produce any "dangerous spray of secondary particle" from the dust on the spacesuits.
I feel that Your statement that the astronauts would have died or been severely ill by bringing in radioctive dust, has no support in facts.
The surface of the Moon is baldly exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares, and some of that radiation is very hard to stop with shielding. Furthermore, when cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous spray of secondary particles right at your feet. All this radiation penetrating human flesh can damage DNA, boosting the risk of cancer and other maladies.
Let me give you an advice: the validating method by excellence is the "crossing data"(comparison between different data sources), it´s advisable waiting until get data coming from another missions, I am sure that the great media of USA will earn quite a lot of money when foreign missions reach the Moon, the media will do it by means of making comparisons.
MOONLANDINGS FILMED ON PLANET EARTH Nasa Fake Apollo Missions Area51 dreamslandresortdotcom LM was a Toy Space Craft no blueprints 4KB ram pocket calculator for a computer No lead shielding 27 layers of gold foil cover RAM 4kBs (combined memory of CSM and LEM computer) ROM 36 kBs Basic machine cycle 2.048 MHz Total memory less than 150 kB or less than a 1.4MB floppy disk
1. The rover was folded and attached to hull of the LEM and not carried inside.
2. The didn't bolt it together. They unfolded it and of course the mechanics were prepared for the gloves.
3. There is no intense heat since there's no atmosphere to transport the heat. The heat only appears on the surface. Furthermore all objects had a reflective surface to reflect the sunlight. And a day on moon last 28 days. They landed during the moon morning an left before noon with it's higher temperatures.
@sverebom. Let me give you an advice: the validating method by excellence is the "crossing data"(comparison between different data sources), it´s advisable waiting until get data coming from another missions, I am sure that the great media of USA will earn quite a lot of money when foreign missions reach the Moon, the media will do it by means of making comparisons. In other hand, it´s most easy trust on NASA than trying to make an approaching from another view point .
@sverebom Atmosphere does not "transport" heat. On earth, it's the thicker layer of atmosphere in the morning and evening that sunlight has to travel through that REDUCES the energy. On the moon, with no atmosphere, that effect IS NOT THERE, so the FULL radiant energy of the sun impacts the astronots.
To think that 8 of you are too stupid to know this.
There are three methods of transferring heat, radiation, conduction and convection.
In a vacuum only the first works, it's why a thermos works.
Some heat would transfer from the regoloth to the suits, but the overshoe soles were made of silicone rubber, the same is used in some hotmitts made for much higher then even lunar noon temperatures.
The suits were white, reflecting away most heat radiation.
how did they fit that rover in the lm and how the hell did they bolt it together with space gloves on and how did they keep the lm cool in the intence heat?
Because a man can dig into the ground, collect samples and place complex experiments on the surface of the moon. A probe can collect samples as well but not as good as a men. And humans can find creative solutions. Russia tried it with probes but many of them failed.
Oh, and the race was about sending men to the moon, not probes.
you people must be stupid if you think thats the moon and china will be shoveling the dirt soon when they cant find the flag or rovers etc.and if they had so much hi tec in the 60s to remote the camera why send men?
Over the past decade, moonhoax advocates have brought up many intriguing points regarding the Apollo missions to the moon. None of them, however, are indisputable evidence of fraud, and most are misunderstandings of basic physics or mission specifications. Several lines of solid & scientific evidence point to an actual moonlanding. The 880 pounds of moonrocks brought back to earth are the most obvious evidence. More than 30,000 pictures were brought back and hours of video.
This comment has received too many negative votes show
:DDD fake
amfikz 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=NQfTh7UHxiw
The well known American moon hoax member Buzz Aldrin is a theorist. He assumes(and according to his theory we have to assume)that the Soviets had the ability to track Apollo..despite the fact these long ago extinct Soviet idiots couldn't spot a plane over Moscow even a whole 20 years after the time of the Apollo moon hoax/film/crime/fraud,or whatever you call it,of 1969 on which the theorist villain Aldrin played a center role.
potrodsas 6 months ago
it wud of been the greatest prank ever if the rock starting rolling towards them as they touched it for the first time
chillyrooster 8 months ago
the great usa made it to the moon thanks to the great white people to .
tomanyasses 10 months ago
I like to think the astronauts thought: "Fuck! I travel 250,000 miles and I got to dig some ditches? Hell, I would have rather stayed home and dug myself a pool."
"God damn scientists want their rocks. Come here and get it yourself you lazy bastards. And I use to think it was a pain in the ass when my wife sent me to the store for milk. "
"Momma use to bitch at me for playing in the dirt as a kid. Well mom, look at me now. Bit sorry you hit me with a belt when I tracked dirt in ain't ya?"
TG1212able 10 months ago
lol yeah they act and talk like kids... but who wouldnt? You're in the Moooo00o0o0o0on playing with dirt and walking around! lolol
gtenshi 1 year ago
I understand you all, there nothing pecuilar .... but why all the acting surprising like they playing up for the camera ...this is how rumours start on the fake moon landing
THREESIXNINE100 1 year ago
@YDDES ..There are two sets of footprints lead to that rock that mean two astronauts was there.
THREESIXNINE100 1 year ago
@THREESIXNINE100 OK, so they have walked over there some minutes ago. What about it? Maybe they just went back to the Rover to pick up the shovel. Nothing peculiar with this video at all.
YDDES 1 year ago
they trying to look supries... the acting is suck. someone was at that rock before look at the footprints to left.
THREESIXNINE100 1 year ago
@THREESIXNINE100 Well, who said that one of them hadn't been close to that rock the minute before?
YDDES 1 year ago
@THREESIXNINE100
Use your ears, they just turned the rock over before collecting the sample.
davewatcher 1 year ago
The suits are covered with dust it would be brought back in the lem with them. The dust is radioactive and should not be breathed in. How did they avoid breathing in the dust back in the lem? You cant breathe in ionizing radiated lunar dust and not get radiation poisoning.
idlebrainidol 1 year ago
@idlebrainidol Who says the dust is dangerously radioactive? Have You checked any real scientifical information about that?
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Only every modern study made of the moon shows the dust is radioactive. Have you checked any real science?
idlebrainidol 1 year ago
@idlebrainidol Well, I've read quite a lot about lunar dust, but the hazards mentioned are the sharp, may be even toxic particles, not any big amount of radiation. It's even proposed to use lunar soil as radiation protection for Moon colonies. So, I don't think that the astronauts risked more damage to their lungs when removing their helmets inside the LEM, than on many places on Earth, where there is for example uranium and other radioactive materials in the soil.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Check again the lunar soil is radioactive.
idlebrainidol 1 year ago
@idlebrainidol All right, show me to a source that says the lunar dust is dangerousely radioactive. A scientifical source, not on Youtube or a hoax-promoting site, please. Because I have found sources saying the dust can be abrasive and chemically active, but nothing about radioactive.
Here on Earth, the "dirty" spacesuits were examined and one scientist got an allergic reaction from the dust, but nothing is said about any radiation hazard.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES Lunar dust is often contaminated by UV radiation and high iron content, making it detrimental to the human body. When it gets in the eyes or lungs, it can cause a potentially harmful chemical reaction. Lunar dust also has a unique configuration of small, fine particles with extremely sharp edges that can be dangerous when inhaled.
idlebrainidol 1 year ago
@YDDES Also, because lunar dust has an electrostatic charge, it can cling to any surface with which it comes in contact, making it particularly difficult to remove from surfaces like spacesuits, spacecraft, and equipment.
idlebrainidol 1 year ago
@YDDES There are concerns that the dust found on the lunar surface could cause harmful effects on any manned outpost technology and crew members: * Abrasive nature of the dust particles may rub and wear down surfaces through friction; * Negative effect on coatings used on gaskets to seal equipment from space, optical lenses that include solar panels and windows as well as wiring; * Possible damage to an astronaut's lungs, nervous, and cardiovascular systems.
idlebrainidol 1 year ago
@YDDES The surface of the Moon is baldly exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares, and some of that radiation is very hard to stop with shielding. Furthermore, when cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous spray of secondary particles right at your feet. All this radiation penetrating human flesh can damage DNA, boosting the risk of cancer and other maladies.
idlebrainidol 1 year ago
@idlebrainidol I know of all those potential problems with the lunar dust, but still no information that the dust brought into the LEM's was lethally radioactive. The cosmic rays didn't penetrate the hull of the LEM's to produce any "dangerous spray of secondary particle" from the dust on the spacesuits.
I feel that Your statement that the astronauts would have died or been severely ill by bringing in radioctive dust, has no support in facts.
Just another failed hoax-statement?
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES The lunar surface itself is radioactive!
science nasa dot com
idlebrainidol 1 year ago
@idlebrainidol OK. Give me one SCIENTIFICAL source that says that the lunar dust is dangerous to handle due to RADIOACTIVITY, please.
YDDES 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@YDDES USE NASA I DID!
The surface of the Moon is baldly exposed to cosmic rays and solar flares, and some of that radiation is very hard to stop with shielding. Furthermore, when cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous spray of secondary particles right at your feet. All this radiation penetrating human flesh can damage DNA, boosting the risk of cancer and other maladies.
idlebrainidol 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Let me give you an advice: the validating method by excellence is the "crossing data"(comparison between different data sources), it´s advisable waiting until get data coming from another missions, I am sure that the great media of USA will earn quite a lot of money when foreign missions reach the Moon, the media will do it by means of making comparisons.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
snorting moondust
patientskywatcher 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nasafakedit 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fake Apollo Missions
1969-1972
Nasa FAIRYTALES
nasafakedit 1 year ago
@nasafakedit I wish I could kill everybody who thinks like you. :D
skisail 1 year ago
@skisail why dont you meet me face to face and try kill me
you retarded piece of shit
nasafakedit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nasafakedit I wish I could kick in the face everybody who thinks like you. :D
skisail 1 year ago
hella chromatic aberration going on with this camera..
detibry 1 year ago
Astronauts, The moon rocks only predator.
NelielTuOderswank 2 years ago 2
1. The rover was folded and attached to hull of the LEM and not carried inside.
2. The didn't bolt it together. They unfolded it and of course the mechanics were prepared for the gloves.
3. There is no intense heat since there's no atmosphere to transport the heat. The heat only appears on the surface. Furthermore all objects had a reflective surface to reflect the sunlight. And a day on moon last 28 days. They landed during the moon morning an left before noon with it's higher temperatures.
sverebom 2 years ago 14
actualy one lunar day is about 2 weeks, but you're right about the other stuff.
ftutbs 2 years ago
@sverebom. Let me give you an advice: the validating method by excellence is the "crossing data"(comparison between different data sources), it´s advisable waiting until get data coming from another missions, I am sure that the great media of USA will earn quite a lot of money when foreign missions reach the Moon, the media will do it by means of making comparisons. In other hand, it´s most easy trust on NASA than trying to make an approaching from another view point .
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@sverebom Atmosphere does not "transport" heat. On earth, it's the thicker layer of atmosphere in the morning and evening that sunlight has to travel through that REDUCES the energy. On the moon, with no atmosphere, that effect IS NOT THERE, so the FULL radiant energy of the sun impacts the astronots.
To think that 8 of you are too stupid to know this.
beneehall 1 year ago
@beneehall
There are three methods of transferring heat, radiation, conduction and convection.
In a vacuum only the first works, it's why a thermos works.
Some heat would transfer from the regoloth to the suits, but the overshoe soles were made of silicone rubber, the same is used in some hotmitts made for much higher then even lunar noon temperatures.
The suits were white, reflecting away most heat radiation.
Finally, it was lunar morning.
lunarpedia*org/index*php?title=Lunar_Temperature
loperspest 1 year ago
@sverebom i jus wanna know how2 traverse the van allen belts safely
JvillnEnt 11 months ago
@JvillnEnt
How is easy, there simply is not enough radiation in it to be dangerous over such a short time they were in it.
ytmoog 9 months ago
@JvillnEnt I just want the Van Allen T-Shirt
jeditight 6 months ago
how did they fit that rover in the lm and how the hell did they bolt it together with space gloves on and how did they keep the lm cool in the intence heat?
bigfist255 2 years ago
lol charlie cracks me up,he sounds like a little kid sometimes,these guys rule
cripplewoox 2 years ago 12
Because a man can dig into the ground, collect samples and place complex experiments on the surface of the moon. A probe can collect samples as well but not as good as a men. And humans can find creative solutions. Russia tried it with probes but many of them failed.
Oh, and the race was about sending men to the moon, not probes.
sverebom 2 years ago
you people must be stupid if you think thats the moon and china will be shoveling the dirt soon when they cant find the flag or rovers etc.and if they had so much hi tec in the 60s to remote the camera why send men?
bigfist255 2 years ago
The reasoning of a small child.
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
Note the bootprints created in the soil and how they are brighter than the undisturbed soil around them. This is not a characteristic of sand.
TremorHellborn 2 years ago
Wiki has a fantastic amount of detail about the rover. It really was a superb piece of work.
AbelMagwitch73 2 years ago
Who is operating the camera?
stever1957 2 years ago
The camera on the lunar rover could be panned, zoomed and tilted via remote control at Mission Control.
loperspest 2 years ago
Really?
Thank you.
stever1957 2 years ago
Yes, really. In fact we even have the mans name who did it., Edward "Ed" Fendell.
And you're welcome, glad to be of service. :-)
loperspest 2 years ago
notice how robotic the movement is... its clearly not being held by someone.
rogerpenna 2 years ago
Are you so stupid you can't work it out?
davewatcher 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Compare shadows of actornauts and rock!? HAHAHAHAHA
user17v 2 years ago
they are the same u idiot!!!
Supercramer69 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Over the past decade, moonhoax advocates have brought up many intriguing points regarding the Apollo missions to the moon. None of them, however, are indisputable evidence of fraud, and most are misunderstandings of basic physics or mission specifications. Several lines of solid & scientific evidence point to an actual moonlanding. The 880 pounds of moonrocks brought back to earth are the most obvious evidence. More than 30,000 pictures were brought back and hours of video.
The hoax is a hoax.
dopje31857 3 years ago
"Look at that soil" 0:12 haha, he sounds gay
MonkeyBoy2194 3 years ago
wtf u on about he sounds gay? more man than ul ever be faggot
cripplewoox 2 years ago
Well to me he has the same voice as most of the gays I hear, especially the village people
MonkeyBoy2194 2 years ago
Nice answer... :-) most people would be in total panic i think, thinking about the fact, they would , or would'nt be able to come back to Earth.
Migg83 2 years ago
Wow. Interesting. :)
SpacePavolet 3 years ago