American Academy of Pediatrics on Circumcision

[feministsAreCorrupt]

1:41 Lower penile cancers

Well, how many are there? US and European sources say 1 in 100,000, listing smoking and STDs as the most significant factors, followed by circumcision status. Circumcision is a treatment for cancerous foreskins, just as masectomy is a treatment for breast cancer.

No matter what, 33% of the US still believes in infant penis sculpting despite the American Academy of Pedatrics statement that they do NOT recommend circumcision.

The mark of the religious and the ignorant

[fctchk]

Only in the wealthiest and best educated third world country in the world is this still a topic.

[shohmyoh]

you know what else reduces S.T.I. among circumcised and uncircumcised guys...Condoms you should wear a dome regardless.

Also that cancer reduction link has never been proven.

[JstNEarthling]

Notice it's the jewish doctor who disagrees with the reality of the issue...he still wants to do that frickin'  BLOOD SACRIFICE which is what circ actually is. Especially when a jewish cutter does it he sucks the first blood into his mouth right after the cutting.....and has been giving NY babies Herpes in past years....

[nh4files]

What I find amusing about the pro-circ guys who say that it reduces chances of HIV is that they're basically saying to cut off the most sensitive part of your body so that you can *still* be at risk. What? Circumcised people can just go and have unprotected sex? Wear a condom, problem solved without senseless bodily mutilation. What next, cut off the ears of construction workers to help prevent deafness?

[ufee]

This country is so fucking stupid.

[stillrightorwrong]

Totally irresponsible clip

[blackstarzero]

Lets not forget they found that circumcisions of their male partner increases the chance of a woman contracting HIV just as much as it supposedly reduces it for a man. This means that circumcision wouldn't have any noticeable affects on the rate of HIV in heterosexual populations. Research also shows that circumcisions do not protect those men who have sex with men and men who have sex with men are one of the highest risk groups of people to get HIV by sexual means.

[seaco2000]

They just want to make money!! If they wanted people to cut their baby boys nipples off, they would have did it too!!

[HaveHeardAllTheLies]

the Germans simply examined the penis to identify all jews for either deportation or the labor camps. Morris Fishbein was the jewish editor of the AMA Journal from 1924 to 1950 who convinced America to start cutting all infant penises regardless of race. The jews schemed to be hidden amongst other circumcised males in case the American people ever rebelled against jewish supremacism such as the Germans. Untold millions of American infants have suffered penis mutilation since WW2.

[seaco2000]

@HaveHeardAllTheLies

Yes, I agree with you too! I'm aware of that and these days stolen foreskins are use as $ foreskin fibroblasts!

[JstNEarthling]

@HaveHeardAllTheLies Exactly, and people don't want to admit it because they're afraid the rest of the assholes will scream, "RACIST HATER" waaaaah. But the truth will set you free, think critically everyone and it is rather obvious there actually is a conspiracy, to put it in familiar terms, to convince the public that it is still considered protection from STDs, a new consideration BTW...

[JstNEarthling]

@HaveHeardAllTheLies Exactly!

[procircaustralia]

haha. this is OLD and does not account for the recent studies showing circumcision has significant benefits! :D

[Gwynsek]

Then let the boy decide to do it as a grown up, if you do believe this,do not make apology of it in relation to a child who has no choice on this.Muslims even do it on ten- year olds without anesthesia,too !

[Hugh7777]

@procircaustralia: Ah yes "significant". In statistics, "significant" is a technical term meaning "not due to chance, 19 times out of 20". It does not mean "major" or "compellingly large" A similar weasel-wording is "reduces the risk" - sure, measurably, but from what, to what? Making a trivial risk even more trivial is not a good reason to do it.

[Bonobo3D]

Important historical footage. For a while in the 1990's circumcision was being seriously questioned in the media. Denial keeps this atrocity from being eradicated. All parents need to understand this subject deeply so they can recognize the importance of protecting their children from harmful surgery. Parents will have a far better relationship with a child who bonds with them and does not have to process the brain damaging pain of circumcision.