i still dont see the tornado-shaped wake vortex like in other videos. your picked footage is to short to see any developing wake votexes. Taking a cursory look at other footages prooves that there is no wake
wrong, and bias. you see luckystrika, i bet you can't find a single other video that shows this area. none of them are close enough to the explosion. soz.
not to mention the fact that wake vortex size is inversely proportional to speed. the greater the speed, the smaller the vortex. again: soz.
@brokenstyx with 500 mph you should have seen huge wakes, i dont see anything here. example: /watch?v=__pyxPb6gMc , watch especially 0:50 to see forms which develop
i've not seen any home recordings that started before the first plane hit. most start after the first hit, or after the second, and the archives are just the stations own recordings of their broadcast (they wouldn't show interference unless they were already live from manhattan somewhere, and i don't any were).
although there was that one camera pointed at the towers at 8am, but no footage has been released from it until after the first hit).
'some obscure reason"... The reason is neither obscure or a big secret. Have you taken the time to read PNAC? Do you have any idea what a POA is and how it's implemented? Obviously, you have NOT served in the military.
"Because the "no planers" just do not live in reality". Are you saying that what you saw on tv on 9/11 was reality? Please tell me what reality is then.
This video you show proves nothing.
bkayganich 5 months ago
How bout awake vortex? As in who ever makes these retarded videos needs to WAKE UP from the brain addled stupor they are currently in.
roquefortfiles 11 months ago
@roquefortfiles
:'(
lol
brokenstyx 11 months ago
i still dont see the tornado-shaped wake vortex like in other videos. your picked footage is to short to see any developing wake votexes. Taking a cursory look at other footages prooves that there is no wake
LuckyStr1ka 1 year ago
@LuckyStr1ka
wrong, and bias. you see luckystrika, i bet you can't find a single other video that shows this area. none of them are close enough to the explosion. soz.
not to mention the fact that wake vortex size is inversely proportional to speed. the greater the speed, the smaller the vortex. again: soz.
brokenstyx 1 year ago
@LuckyStr1ka
i like this part of your comment:
"Taking a cursory look at other footages prooves that there is no wake"
a "cursory look" proves something, eh? lol
brokenstyx 1 year ago
@brokenstyx with 500 mph you should have seen huge wakes, i dont see anything here. example: /watch?v=__pyxPb6gMc , watch especially 0:50 to see forms which develop
LuckyStr1ka 1 year ago
@LuckyStr1ka
"with 500 mph you should have seen huge wakes"
please do some research. as i have already stated, vortex size is INVERSELY proportional to speed.
therefore, at 500mph, we should have seen tiny wakes. just like i highlight in this video.
let me know when you've done some research strika
x
brokenstyx 1 year ago
thanking ace backer? now that controvercial move!
scottishcreamthe1st 2 years ago
Is there any signal/picture problems on any of the news channels when the first plane hit?
photography66videos 2 years ago
hey photo
i've not seen any home recordings that started before the first plane hit. most start after the first hit, or after the second, and the archives are just the stations own recordings of their broadcast (they wouldn't show interference unless they were already live from manhattan somewhere, and i don't any were).
although there was that one camera pointed at the towers at 8am, but no footage has been released from it until after the first hit).
brokenstyx 2 years ago
'some obscure reason"... The reason is neither obscure or a big secret. Have you taken the time to read PNAC? Do you have any idea what a POA is and how it's implemented? Obviously, you have NOT served in the military.
lmfecher 2 years ago
So, is this going to finally bury the "no plane" theory?
No.
Because the "no planers" just do not live in reality.
dangerouslytalented 2 years ago
"Because the "no planers" just do not live in reality". Are you saying that what you saw on tv on 9/11 was reality? Please tell me what reality is then.
lmfecher 2 years ago
Reality is where religious people get hooked in by the promise of eternal paradise and hijack planes and crash them.
Not a pleasant concept, but far more realistic than "the government/new world order destroyed these buildings for some obscure reason".
dangerouslytalented 2 years ago