@PassiveSmoking If you listen closely you can hear the narrator say rarely does a crash happen due to ALL of these causes he mentions, not MORE THAN ONE of these causes. I dont know about you but I have never heard of a crash from terrorism, weather, mechanical malfunction, technical trouble and human error all combined into one accident.
"When a hydraulic failure causes the engine to be torn from the plane" (about 2 mins in). This is backward! The engine breaking away from the plane damaged the hydraulics.
Barely watched for 3 minutes and already alarm bells are ringing regarding the quality of the research put into this. The American Airlines crash was caused by a badly executed engine change cracking a support structure for the engine which led to a fatigue crack failure a few flights later, not "hydraulic failure", and the statement that plane crashes are rarely due to more than one cause is completely wrong. There are usually several contributing factors.
@1:34: It wasn't hydraulic failure that caused the engine to fall off of the AA DC-10, rather, it was incorrect procedures for engine removal that cracked the engine mount bolts, resulting in the engine coming off, which severed the hydraulic lines, which caused the slats to retract on the left wing, which caused a the left wing to stall, which caused the crash.
Rubbish show. Repeats showing the same shocking pictures over and over again - with crappy false animated flames, rather than giving any propper analysis. Go watch real mayday/ACI instead. Don't trust people who confuse a 757 and a 767 to talk about aircraft.
Entirely KLM captains fault. There could have been as many factors as you want, if the KLM pilot had actually checked he was clear to takeoff, and not just guessed, this wouldn't have happened.
Oh, good grief - the AA DC-10 engine separation in Chicago was not caused by hydraulic failure. These folks must have a goatherder for a technical advisor.
This is a very informative documentary but I agree 100% with Rotpig. Adding animated fire and smoke effects to historical photographs is ridiculous--a gimmicky revisionist act. Silly reenactments and hokey digitally animated recreations are just as bad and have marred many an otherwise serious documentary piece.
@michaeljehn Even more tacky is that many of the photographs used are from the Nairobi Lufthansa 747 crash, not Tenerife. It really makes me angry that programme makers continue to make these stupid errors, instead of doing a little bit of research.
fatalswoop1, yet Airbuses rules still, the Boeings are one of the most planes to crash in the world, whilst an Airbus isn't, even though there are more Boeings being used, the calculated number of Boeing crashes, outweighs the calculation of Airbuses crashed, even if the both plane were in a equal number of use. Europe's celebration re-initiated!
@NightCrimson In the last couple years, alone, there have been more significant Airbus crashes with loss of life, than Boeing crashes. Several A330 crashes which involved great loss of life. Looking at modern Boeing jetliners which includes the 737NG, 747-400 (sort of), 767-400ER, and 777, the 764ER has never suffered a crash and the 777 has only had one crash and that was a BA 777 at Heathrow. No one died. The 744 has crashed, none have been attributed to the plane its self. You're a dummy.
The calculated number of Boeing crashes outweighs the calculation of airbus crashes? Did you just pull that of your ass? Haha yeah you did. Airbus is much worse than Boeing, and I am from the UK and hate USA, but Boeing makes much better planes, only has more crashes because THERE ARE MORE BOEING PLANES AND THEY HAVE BEEN IN SERVICE LONGER. Also, most Boeing crashes due to pilot error, most airbus crashes are due to technical malfunctions ^^. P.S. the A380 IS UGLY
@bubby963. Yeah, I get it. Anyway you're replying to a four month old comment that I don't even care about at all. If you must know, I did fabricate it, because, well, really I have no reason, it was just a wistful comment that I gave basically no effort into. Truthfully I don't care for planes really, so I can't identify what a A380 looks like, but I'll take your word for it, that it isn't a very attractive plane. You correct in your answer, oh well.
@FixedNewsChannel It's so funny that you correct my language skills... YOU american fool. If I make mistakes in English is because it's not my mother thongue. I speak 2 languages perfectly (Spanish and Catalan) and I'm learning English.
What about you? ONLY ENGLISH??? haahah how retarded...
@fatalswoop1 That honestly doesn't mean anything. If the aircraft are safe enough the probability of them crashing is lowered automatically. Airbus has much less crashes because they entered the business when aircraft technology was developing extremely well. This increased safety standards which makes Airbus statistically more safe than Boeing. However, by now both are equally safe and great companies producing great planes. Its simply a matter of opinion.
@fatalswoop1 nb that the boeings crash cuz the planes are versatile and easy to handle so pilots push to planes to limits and the terrorist always jack it cuz its so sexy not even Airbus can handle so yeah FUCK YOU AIRBUS
I wonder who was the actually guilty for this horror........the terrorist group or Jacob Veldhuyzen van Zanten...........from an icon in KLM..........to the leading contributor of the biggest disaster in Aviation history
Backing up comgeek24's comments, though what actually led to the crash was the uncommanded retraction of both slots and flaps as a result of severed hydraulic lines in the wing, caused when the number 1 engine parted company.
And that black and white pic of the burning 747 on the ground was a Lufthansa plane that crashed on takeoff in Africa back in the seventies. That was one of, if not the, first loss of a 747.
Ja ci przetłumacze - oglądałem tych filmów masę i seria mnie wkurwia. Przy każdym wypadku airbusa podkreślają jakieś 40 razy nazwe producenta i sugerują że coś nie tak z samolotem. Gdy podobny wypadek zdaży się boeingowi to nagle skupiają się na innych powodach katastrofy a nazwy producenta nie wymieniają. Filmik może fajny ale to amerykańska propaganda
There were to many coincidences for this accident, 1st Gran Canaria terrorist attack a bomb exploded, overcrowded runway, delays, radio signal not working, human error by the radio control, and weather.
uhhh, a number of those "coincidences" were DIRECTLY caused by the preceeding event, and the stuff with the radio is a fact of the way radio transmision works.
Um, I hate to be that guy, but the Chicago crash in 1979 (American Airlines Flight 191) happened because the engine broke off the wing due to shoddy maintenance procedures, not hydraulic failure, although the hydraulic failure WAS what caused the plane to go out of control and ultimately crash.
@TheTenchLOVER flying is the safest form of transport if everyone does their job there should be no problem it's getting the likes of the faa to do things on safety instead of going for money hey when i get my pilot's licence i'll take you up and you can have a go if you want
07:19 = On December 6, 1999, at about 8:35 p.m., United Airlines flight 1448, a Boeing 757, was involved in a runway incursion on runway 5 Right at Theodore Francis Green State Airport, near Providence, Rhode Island. At the time of the incident, it was dark and the reported visibility was one-quarter mile.
Why do these spanish tower controllers sound as if they were Mexican? English can be very different if it is Latin or Spanish from Spain. I`m Spanish and I think they could have been more careful with the reconstruction, surely Spanish english doesn't sound like that, and they physically look more like Mexican than like from the Canary islands. A negative point.
This show was made in the US (I think, I havent seen this particular documentary series), and most shows made there don't realy care about the differances between European Spanish and Latin American Spanish (In terms of language, culture and people). Mostly because there are way more latin american spanish people than european spanish people in the US.
@alphamone Yes, I think you're all right ... They don't care (or even not know know) the difference. I remember when I saw on TV a group of US students that were asked about where they thought Spain was in a map, and 94% of them located it somewhere under Mexico ...
its on geographic channel,which is free on virgin just for the moment.the dutch captain got really pissed off,-he had a very long day,and he was itching to go home
@PassiveSmoking If you listen closely you can hear the narrator say rarely does a crash happen due to ALL of these causes he mentions, not MORE THAN ONE of these causes. I dont know about you but I have never heard of a crash from terrorism, weather, mechanical malfunction, technical trouble and human error all combined into one accident.
kbs1212 2 days ago
"When a hydraulic failure causes the engine to be torn from the plane" (about 2 mins in). This is backward! The engine breaking away from the plane damaged the hydraulics.
LaKravenStudios 6 days ago in playlist Aviation
@rock3tcat=lost in his own little fantasy world! Poor thing.
Odin197188 2 weeks ago
At 2.01 it is Ethiopian Airlines Flight 961 that crashed into Comoros Islands..
cobweb657 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
cobweb657 2 weeks ago
I agree with passivesmokeing another weeor at 2:01 it was a 767 not a 757.
airplanebuilderman 1 month ago
Wait, wouldn't recreating the accident be suicide?
MobiusSpy 1 month ago
adding fake flames to a crash picture ... necessary??
alSation81 1 month ago
my last name is Bragg.
Chukwillard 1 month ago
Barely watched for 3 minutes and already alarm bells are ringing regarding the quality of the research put into this. The American Airlines crash was caused by a badly executed engine change cracking a support structure for the engine which led to a fatigue crack failure a few flights later, not "hydraulic failure", and the statement that plane crashes are rarely due to more than one cause is completely wrong. There are usually several contributing factors.
PassiveSmoking 1 month ago
Comment removed
54MURAI 1 month ago
There was actually a more recent aviation disaster that occured on purpose. Thumbs up if you want to know.
XtremeConnor 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is air crash disaster and air crash investigation the same thing? i saw part of this in an air crash investigation episode
ultimatezero12345 3 months ago
Comment removed
ultimatezero12345 3 months ago
Plus it was a Boeing 767 not 757 and you're getting alot wrong
airlegoland 3 months ago
@1:34: It wasn't hydraulic failure that caused the engine to fall off of the AA DC-10, rather, it was incorrect procedures for engine removal that cracked the engine mount bolts, resulting in the engine coming off, which severed the hydraulic lines, which caused the slats to retract on the left wing, which caused a the left wing to stall, which caused the crash.
raynus1 4 months ago
@raynus1 correct!!
matatanXtreme 2 months ago
Do major arlines and jumbo jets still fly to tenerife? I only see things like eayjet 737s and charter flights
The6thSimpson 4 months ago
Comment removed
krakenwave 3 months ago
Rubbish show. Repeats showing the same shocking pictures over and over again - with crappy false animated flames, rather than giving any propper analysis. Go watch real mayday/ACI instead. Don't trust people who confuse a 757 and a 767 to talk about aircraft.
benmaestro 5 months ago
Comment removed
BeeEmmW 5 months ago
fucking biatches can't you just tell what exactly happened already? why to spend 8 mins for stupid meaningful epic phrases maafucka?
funthing1991 5 months ago
2:17 "Terrorists" my ass. Well yes, "terrorist" but not Muslims ones. Illuminati ones. May they all burn in hell. And of course they will.
kevjay777 5 months ago
Los... palmas.... where the fuck is that?.... LAS palmas....
ultracairo 7 months ago
why then you built a airport in place where is 24/7 a fog????
oreskec 7 months ago
noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
cjpepper60 7 months ago
Its not a good idea to watch this shit when your going on holidays in a week.. to tenerife ..FML
HellYeeeeaaaahhhh 7 months ago
Entirely KLM captains fault. There could have been as many factors as you want, if the KLM pilot had actually checked he was clear to takeoff, and not just guessed, this wouldn't have happened.
bubby963 8 months ago
This has kept me avoiding Canarian islands and i think i will never go the Tenefire.
kyostim 9 months ago
one woman was not on board and saved her live.
thenairolf01 9 months ago
So if the KLM hadn't caught on fire after crash landing back on the runway, there would've been survivors?
Golditz95 10 months ago
incredible: Our sweet KLM
daaanNederland 10 months ago 5
Comment removed
dormi87 10 months ago
Unfortune..sorry for the people impacted.
Coincidence.. Its the same day ..March 27th it happend.
:(
mahesh1231 11 months ago
Oh, good grief - the AA DC-10 engine separation in Chicago was not caused by hydraulic failure. These folks must have a goatherder for a technical advisor.
whatis252264 11 months ago 4
@whatis252264 I'm glad someone caught that.
goldbergje 10 months ago
This is a very informative documentary but I agree 100% with Rotpig. Adding animated fire and smoke effects to historical photographs is ridiculous--a gimmicky revisionist act. Silly reenactments and hokey digitally animated recreations are just as bad and have marred many an otherwise serious documentary piece.
michaeljehn 11 months ago
@michaeljehn Even more tacky is that many of the photographs used are from the Nairobi Lufthansa 747 crash, not Tenerife. It really makes me angry that programme makers continue to make these stupid errors, instead of doing a little bit of research.
tjf4375 11 months ago 3
Robert Bragg is 100% right when he says: "You have to calm down". I agree. Van Zanten was a bitch.
raulox71 1 year ago 3
The animated photos look totally FUCKED.
Rotpig 1 year ago
fatalswoop1, yet Airbuses rules still, the Boeings are one of the most planes to crash in the world, whilst an Airbus isn't, even though there are more Boeings being used, the calculated number of Boeing crashes, outweighs the calculation of Airbuses crashed, even if the both plane were in a equal number of use. Europe's celebration re-initiated!
NightCrimson 1 year ago
@NightCrimson You do not need to say that out loud. you keep your feelings to your self. you do not need to hurt other peoples feelings.
2011LEGOFAN 1 year ago
@NightCrimson In the last couple years, alone, there have been more significant Airbus crashes with loss of life, than Boeing crashes. Several A330 crashes which involved great loss of life. Looking at modern Boeing jetliners which includes the 737NG, 747-400 (sort of), 767-400ER, and 777, the 764ER has never suffered a crash and the 777 has only had one crash and that was a BA 777 at Heathrow. No one died. The 744 has crashed, none have been attributed to the plane its self. You're a dummy.
Neno8403 11 months ago
@NightCrimson
The calculated number of Boeing crashes outweighs the calculation of airbus crashes? Did you just pull that of your ass? Haha yeah you did. Airbus is much worse than Boeing, and I am from the UK and hate USA, but Boeing makes much better planes, only has more crashes because THERE ARE MORE BOEING PLANES AND THEY HAVE BEEN IN SERVICE LONGER. Also, most Boeing crashes due to pilot error, most airbus crashes are due to technical malfunctions ^^. P.S. the A380 IS UGLY
bubby963 8 months ago
@bubby963. Yeah, I get it. Anyway you're replying to a four month old comment that I don't even care about at all. If you must know, I did fabricate it, because, well, really I have no reason, it was just a wistful comment that I gave basically no effort into. Truthfully I don't care for planes really, so I can't identify what a A380 looks like, but I'll take your word for it, that it isn't a very attractive plane. You correct in your answer, oh well.
NightCrimson 8 months ago
@bubby963 I think you're true, though the A380 isn't really ugly. I like both companies equally, even though I've never been on an airbus.
ibea21 7 months ago
See the wreckage from 0:37 to 0:43?
THAT is what would have been on the LAWN of the Pentagon
on 9-11 IF a plane had actually hit it, instead of a MISSILE
that just made a round hole.
4freespeech 1 year ago
@ 1:58... its not a 757, the aircraft was actually a 767
737747757767777787 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's because there are more Boeing planes in service than Airbus. Europe celebration fail.
fatalswoop1 1 year ago
That's because there are more Boeing plane in service than Airbus. Europe celebration fail.
fatalswoop1 1 year ago 18
@fatalswoop1 Because Boeing planes crash more often? Thats not a good reason. I've never been in a Boeing.
In Europe we ALWAYS use Airbus, it's more safety
Aleixpb2 7 months ago
@Aleixpb2 "It's more safety". What the fuck does that even mean? Should I take safety tips from someone who can't spell properly?
FixedNewsChannel 7 months ago
@FixedNewsChannel Ok, Shakespeare, it's more SAFE. Do you feel better? What a pedant... ¬¬ Everybody can make a mistake.
Aleixpb2 7 months ago
@FixedNewsChannel It's so funny that you correct my language skills... YOU american fool. If I make mistakes in English is because it's not my mother thongue. I speak 2 languages perfectly (Spanish and Catalan) and I'm learning English.
What about you? ONLY ENGLISH??? haahah how retarded...
Aleixpb2 7 months ago
@fatalswoop1 That honestly doesn't mean anything. If the aircraft are safe enough the probability of them crashing is lowered automatically. Airbus has much less crashes because they entered the business when aircraft technology was developing extremely well. This increased safety standards which makes Airbus statistically more safe than Boeing. However, by now both are equally safe and great companies producing great planes. Its simply a matter of opinion.
ClassicMusicOnly 6 months ago
@fatalswoop1 fail airbus is the pilot u won't fly a airbus the airbus wil fly the pilot thats, weak
xlegendzx3 5 months ago
@fatalswoop1 nb that the boeings crash cuz the planes are versatile and easy to handle so pilots push to planes to limits and the terrorist always jack it cuz its so sexy not even Airbus can handle so yeah FUCK YOU AIRBUS
hamellious 2 months ago
@fatalswoop1
Boeing: 100 years of shit.
Airbus: 40 years of good but not great stuff.
Americans: semi mentally challenged patriotic failures
Me: LOL
rock3tcat 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I like how plane crashes mostly happen in boeings not airbuses Europe rulea
warierjoshboy 1 year ago
I like how most plane crashes happen in boeings not airbuses Europe rules
warierjoshboy 1 year ago
The 1996 HIjacked Plane was a 767, not 757...
DBCBoy618 1 year ago
The worst air disaster in aviation and it happens on the ground. Go figure
Crosisborg 1 year ago 3
@Crosisborg
The ground is the most dangerous place for a plane to be. Near it or on it.
Fangsout1 2 months ago
"How did this happen?" KLM pilots? (next to russians they are)
VictorPronosov 1 year ago
the flames moving in the pictures should be cut off, its not the natural picture anymore. RIP
Tobizz3 1 year ago
now this is the best air crash disaster in history
pilotdave1000 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I wonder who was the actually guilty for this horror........the terrorist group or Jacob Veldhuyzen van Zanten...........from an icon in KLM..........to the leading contributor of the biggest disaster in Aviation history
antediluvianer 1 year ago
Comment removed
johnclansang09 1 year ago
Comment removed
johnclansang09 1 year ago
The African water landing was done by a 767.
Christoo92 1 year ago 57
@Christoo92 i thought it was a 737
mw2orblackops 4 months ago
OMG yet another horrible boeing crash
kerimil 1 year ago
I've been there. very nice place
9806mani 1 year ago
Backing up comgeek24's comments, though what actually led to the crash was the uncommanded retraction of both slots and flaps as a result of severed hydraulic lines in the wing, caused when the number 1 engine parted company.
floatingzap 1 year ago
OMG at 0:24 to 0:26 you can see the KLM cockpit ripped off the plane
worst crash ive seen
Hendrex40 1 year ago
Comment removed
Alaforte456 1 year ago
what a shit dokumentation^^ in 1978 an md 80 crashed on 1:57 a 767 was hijacked ^^
kenan49 1 year ago
And that black and white pic of the burning 747 on the ground was a Lufthansa plane that crashed on takeoff in Africa back in the seventies. That was one of, if not the, first loss of a 747.
jakfuki 1 year ago
Przetłumaczy ktoś to na język polski...
zamileo 1 year ago
@zamileo
Ja ci przetłumacze - oglądałem tych filmów masę i seria mnie wkurwia. Przy każdym wypadku airbusa podkreślają jakieś 40 razy nazwe producenta i sugerują że coś nie tak z samolotem. Gdy podobny wypadek zdaży się boeingowi to nagle skupiają się na innych powodach katastrofy a nazwy producenta nie wymieniają. Filmik może fajny ale to amerykańska propaganda
kerimil 1 year ago 2
There were to many coincidences for this accident, 1st Gran Canaria terrorist attack a bomb exploded, overcrowded runway, delays, radio signal not working, human error by the radio control, and weather.
Joss2012 1 year ago
@Joss2012
uhhh, a number of those "coincidences" were DIRECTLY caused by the preceeding event, and the stuff with the radio is a fact of the way radio transmision works.
alphamone 1 year ago
UMMM
update the details for the Video
thesolimanz 1 year ago
Um, I hate to be that guy, but the Chicago crash in 1979 (American Airlines Flight 191) happened because the engine broke off the wing due to shoddy maintenance procedures, not hydraulic failure, although the hydraulic failure WAS what caused the plane to go out of control and ultimately crash.
comgeek24 1 year ago 3
The Ethiopian Aircrash that was hijacked is a Boeing 767 not a Boeing 757
nanomusic 1 year ago
im scared of planes
TheTenchLOVER 1 year ago
@TheTenchLOVER flying is the safest form of transport if everyone does their job there should be no problem it's getting the likes of the faa to do things on safety instead of going for money hey when i get my pilot's licence i'll take you up and you can have a go if you want
krugerfuchs 1 year ago
07:19 = On December 6, 1999, at about 8:35 p.m., United Airlines flight 1448, a Boeing 757, was involved in a runway incursion on runway 5 Right at Theodore Francis Green State Airport, near Providence, Rhode Island. At the time of the incident, it was dark and the reported visibility was one-quarter mile.
watch?v=qUDFY5qlTSA
taketheredpillnow 1 year ago
WHOA!
Sirwest299 1 year ago
Why do these spanish tower controllers sound as if they were Mexican? English can be very different if it is Latin or Spanish from Spain. I`m Spanish and I think they could have been more careful with the reconstruction, surely Spanish english doesn't sound like that, and they physically look more like Mexican than like from the Canary islands. A negative point.
Gaua1 1 year ago
@Gaua1
This show was made in the US (I think, I havent seen this particular documentary series), and most shows made there don't realy care about the differances between European Spanish and Latin American Spanish (In terms of language, culture and people). Mostly because there are way more latin american spanish people than european spanish people in the US.
alphamone 1 year ago
@alphamone Yes, I think you're all right ... They don't care (or even not know know) the difference. I remember when I saw on TV a group of US students that were asked about where they thought Spain was in a map, and 94% of them located it somewhere under Mexico ...
Gaua1 1 year ago
Can anyone share more on this TV show itself?
It's called Most Deadly.
Was it a series? What channel was it on?
When was this aired?
Anyone? Poster?
burnbabyapril 1 year ago
its on geographic channel,which is free on virgin just for the moment.the dutch captain got really pissed off,-he had a very long day,and he was itching to go home
COLONEL961 1 year ago
Damn~ !! thnx man for da video
ka3boool2010 1 year ago
holy fuck!
Julzermin14 1 year ago