Also, everyone interested should read "Wing Chun Warrior: The True Tales of Wing Chun Kung Fu Master Duncan Leung, Bruce Lee's Fighting Companion," by Ken Ing. Excellent story packed with info on how to use kung fu for fighting, and the strenghts and weaknesses of various styles (including boxing).
The similarities are probably due to the fact that both Wing Chun & Tyson were likely heavily influenced by 19th century bare-knuckle boxing (intro. to Southern China by the British), and sought a way for a short person to beat a tall person (on the inside). Wing Chun uses bare-knuckle techniques within a chi-based, kung fu framework, while Tyson uses the same techniques in a modern, Western boxing framework. They are not as different as might seem from casual observation.
@quanfa88 my thoughts exactly! People get so hung up on styles they dont realise wingchun is just following the universal principles that any good fighter will use.
All the comparisons between Mike Tyson & Wing Chun are interesting. What no one seems to realize is that Tyson's boxing style is similar to Wing Chun. Both utilize short-range, compressed punches (their force stems from inch power & full body mechanics, rather than retraction & wide arcs), straight punches that appear circular (i.e. Tyson's uppercut vs Wing Chun's lifting punch), emphasize rooting (whether Tyson realizes it or not), & use rapid-fire combinations to the opponent's center.
Im an mma fighter and I learned my wing chun from SiFu Leung. Belive me the things he has tought me work and continue to work to this day!!! I have been in Bar fights street fights and now in the cage and it has not let me down!Boxing is great but if you add SiFu Duncans wing chun to it you'll be amazed. Just for a moment put this image in your mind... think about Mike Tyson and add SiFu Duncans wing chun to it.If this debate is going to happen then argue about the princeples!!!
@manlalaban1 boy, a person like you should be able to end the debate! A foot in wing chun and a foot in MMA! All these fools should be set straight by your words. One can never be too thorough and should never assume there's nothing to be learned from another style! we should rejoice in our fellows' good points and assist where they might be lacking. But I guess that requires a degree of openness and honesty with one's self..
this debate will never end.who has the best styles etc...
to clear something up wing chun it is not a style.it is a fighting concept,a system.
you have the right to give an opinion if you are a professional fighter who has fought against a wing chun sifu.you guys see something in tv and believe it.
Hi my good friend. I don't want to make you feel bad, but unfortunately all of you are wrong. Wing Chung, or ving tzun or wing tsun whatever It is an internal martial art style. It has nothing g to do with sparring, strength and that kind of things. Maybe the wing Chung that you know my friends, it is the commercial version that China sold to the occidental world. The wing Chung that I know, it is soft and delicate but very dangerous, because it applies the internal power or Chi.
@Alachung58 is that why bruce lee would cut right through any body he was a wing chun guy real roof top fights not a sport like boxing im not putin boxing down but bruce and wong shun leung were real fighters not sport
@rchappa LOL yeah, you can explain that to me when I threw a punch in your face. "oooh don't punch me, it's only internaaal" pff if you want to learn fighting: fight.
If you are a truly wing Chung practitioner you will know the concept ¡s like internal styles. It does not mean no contact, it means the use of superior power to defeat you enemy without use only physical strength. If you can not understand that concept you should read more about it or take some lesson with real master
overcome your enemy without physical strength only doesn't mean that you can learn it without hard training AND withouth sparring. you need strength, you need fighting experience. What if your enemy also has some fighting experience?
how you wanna applicate the "soft" wingchun you practice if you never tried it? do you think it will "just work" or what?
@exorzy I love when people speak on things they don't know. I have done many different martial arts, trained in boxing and kickboxing as well. By far wing chun is the most effective art I've ever studied. I attend a place called "Wing chun boxing academy". Key word Boxing. Just so you know. Wing chun is a mother art which most fighting styles have come from to include boxing. All the punches, slips, etc. is all in wing chun. Don't get wrapped up in the BS you see on youtube.
@RydinDubs And I hate when people speak about things they don't know. Dude I do Wing Chun myself and I never said there is no punches etc. in Wingchun, WTF? I just said if you want to be good at Wing Chun, you have to train hard what means: Fighting Drills and Sparring. Theese things requires strength, stamina, timing and a feeling fro distance. If you do know any little thing about boxing, I bet you agree. So where is the problem?
@exorzy I never said you said there is no punches. Train hard I agree and I also agree with the timing and distance. I don't agree with the strength or stamina part though. Unless you meant internal strength? As far stamina, well let me ask you this. Have you ever slammed you fingers in a door. Well how much stamina did the door need to hurt your fingers. Better yet how about a male lion who just eats, sleeps and screws. How much stamina does he need to kill you?
@RydinDubs Well I guess a lion has a lot of stamina :) Okay maybe we should hold streetfighting and tournamentfighting apart. Maybee for streetfighting, stamina isn't that important. But it is for tournament fighting (which I do with wingchun). The same for strength. It's not about raw, uncontrolled power, but fighting always needs power. Unfortunately u're not made of wood, so if someone slamms you with their finger, it's quite possible that you're the one getting hurt... ;-)
@exorzy No a lion doesn't need stamina he just does what is natural. Fighting is fighting, its about the individual not the situation. You'll never see a true master(for lack of a better word) in a tournament because he doen't have to prove himself to anyone but himself. If you really study wing chun then you should know that all the power you need is given to you by your opponent. Unfortunately like most society has tainted you mind. Us and wood are made up of the same basic things.
My friend, you are funny with you "internal power" and your "Chi" (it's Qi actually, I live in China). All martial art is about speed, power and timing. Go figure.
and that is typical of how people see wing chun. "soft" and "deadly" etc. there is many aspect and approach that practitioner may explore, such as, if im not mistaken, GM tsui shung ting (internal&structural aproach), GM wong shun leung (a lot of things=practical ) etc. here sifu duncan leung know the original form, or so i call it, taught by yip man and try to ake different approach. the first time i know wing chun i also think like this.
@rchappa Wing Chun cannot be defined. You learn the base, then the rest is up to you. But, you can't learn the base by sitting around meditating to Buddha. Not sure what the hell you are talking about.
@rchappa sure there is an internal aspect to it--but what good is it if you have not learned how to apply it in fighting situations--such as sparring? Internal or External--it's still a fighting art and you have to fight/spar to know how to use it, otherwise you'll be all nerves, and you might find out that your opponent isn't going to "let" you do anything if he/she can help it. You need both if you really want to understand how the style works.
As an aside, I did just see Sifu Duncan in a restaurant a few weeks ago with my own sifu eating crab legs. I see him periodically when he shoots into town (VA Beach), but mostly he spends his time oversea's "conducting business". when i saw him a few years ago, he was training a san da team in china somewhere, i believe he may have had Steve Faulker with him at the time. My personal experience with him is that he's clearly very dedicated to wing chun, but would never assert that it's "the best".
and if you ever actually get into a the fight, and have been taught by duncan or trained any his predecssors - larry or alan lee or wayne or gordon or chris b, you will figure out quick that you will not be using any fancy joint locking in any fight situation -if you think that's wing chun - you watch too many movies
what you figure out is learning how to use everything else that is taught in full senior training, sparring, cirlcle. how to minimize yourself as a target, but take a punch and pain while delivering one. And how drive one punch one kill thought mentality from power training and shock ups - how to not stop until you've freaking crushed some dude with just the basics.
hey, i'm not promoting that i can even say that i know how to fight, because i was just a student plus, i knew someone always is tougher, stronger and knows more. but, if you were lucky to train chun with duncan and others like him it was not about sticky hands (that's a reaction drill anyways) - if you train with these guys - it's humility to know you are with some great street fighters, but you got enough to get by if you ever had to.
LMFAO apparently "mrharoldb" has'nt read the book about Sifu Duncan's no-bullshit fight episodes where he explains about street fighting via using his REAL applied WingChun he learned str8 from Yip Man or has'nt even met the dude in the first place to even say all this crap to his face, man people don't realize the true fuckin' power of GENUINE Kungfu. WingChun is one the most tampered with styles of Kungfu there is that's why people don't believe it, but Duncan is the REAL DEAL no joke!!!
Hey mrharoldb, unfortunately it's always a slippery slope arguement (x vs y), like saying "ali vs tyson" etc.. more fun to think about than reasonable. but to these guys' point, you did just say it yourself,"sparring, circle, etc"... pugilism is pugilism, nothing less special about one than another. the man proves himself, not the style. the like Usain Bolt doesn't prove Reeboks are better than Nike's on the track (silly arguement).
i really doubt this would help in a real fight, i mean come on, seriously? have a look at REAL FIGHTS on youtube and see where you could apply wing chun. if you want to learn to defend yourself, BOXING is the most effective. being able to knock out your opponent with one punch is way more useful in a real fight than all of this WING CHUN stuff.
Think about it. could any of these guys beat MIKE TYSON
@Alachung58 brother i truly feel that if applied right, any style of fighting is effective rather it be boxing or martial arts."it's not what you know but how you apply it",that makes a method dangerous........
Oh yeah? Have you ever been in a real fight? Well i have and when ur in that situation you don't remember all those fancy joint locking techniques and so on u just want to punch them as hard and as fast as you can. Honestly i'm not trying to be a prat i'm just saying if you really want to defend yourself in a fight boxing is the most useful. watch some other real fights on youtube and see where you could use wing chun.
Don't bring race into the matter, this is meant to be a debate on fighting styles not an excuse for insulting someone's nationallity. Bring something useful to the converstion instead of trying to be clever.
Duncan Leong has fought with western boxers and practitioners of other MA. On one occasion, he fought with a boxing instructor but strangely the guy agreed to fight but asked that no kicking allowed. He ended up in hospital with a cracked skull. Wing chunners fight dirty. Look up Boer and wing chun on youtube. Alternatively, have a sparring engagement with any wing chun instructor and just spar to find out. No rules.
To be fair, please compare with a wing chun practitioner with the muscular strength, weight and size of mike and whose training and conditioning is similar. btw wing chun applications are not those drills and sticky hand stuff you see on youtube. The historical intent of this art was to assasinate and silence imperial officers or defend against armed soldiers.
@mrharoldb I assume you have some experience to back this claim up? Wing chun is easily applied to a street fight scenario. And a wing chun master would destroy most modern fighters, boxing, ufc mma etc. One of the main principles in the inch punch. Being able to finish your opponant within an inch. Not a hung haymaker from tyson that ip man would parry and deliever 80 punches to his center line before he could think of biting him.
@mrharoldb Maybe not. But Mike is a professional athlete. But don't write Duncan off either. Mike would not really have a good handle on low line kicks, or much idea how to defend his groin.
@mrharoldb there's a lot more to wing chun than chisau. at first it's soft, but then you learn how to work with force too. it's just a skill--it doesn't equate to fighting. Duncan has said the same thing. There is plenty of plain old hard stuff to bust up your opponent that we spend a lot of time learning. but learning how to relax (not have tension) can be very useful. you'll react faster. Don't think that youtube videos show you everything. they don't.
@mrharoldb mike tyson trains very hard to get where he's at. and as he gets older he loses his power. Wingchun is designed for the long term. I know severel people who could beat ike tyson simply because they use kicks, something a boxer cannot defend against
@mrharoldb it is clear that you have no idea what wing tsun is and completely unknown its principles and techniques. besides have you ever crossed with Mike Tyson on the street? mike tyson was a professional boxer and is not a point of reference for the average person. Wing Chun was created for ordinary people. and finally, yes. duncan leung can beat mike tyson in a street fight . I did boxing for 8 years. I know what I say. boxing is a sport and street fighting is completely different
@mrharoldb typical cockiness of a boxer. bruce lee would have kick the shit out of Tyson. watch "young bruce lee"(movie) and it explains the difference between a ring match and a real fight.
@mrharoldb brother its not all about boxing or wing chun its all about practicality today we have got ufc mma boxing muay thai y these guys dont fight these fighters and prove y don't they atleast challenge....... watching bruce lee in movies and showing moves on u tube is not superiority..........if they cant fight they should better stop misleading ppl in the name of such arts like wing chung and jkd
Duncan Leung is one of five students from Ip Man who learned the complete Wing Chun with private lessons. Learn more about him, buy your dvd's, will not regret.
Those doubting Wing Chun's effectiveness should go to a local Wing Chun school and challenge the instructor, then comeback and comment.
suntzu05 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you can also see my wooden dummy 7 days work cost around 60$;-)
nice video
01sidiropoulos 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Also, everyone interested should read "Wing Chun Warrior: The True Tales of Wing Chun Kung Fu Master Duncan Leung, Bruce Lee's Fighting Companion," by Ken Ing. Excellent story packed with info on how to use kung fu for fighting, and the strenghts and weaknesses of various styles (including boxing).
quanfa88 5 months ago
Comment removed
quanfa88 5 months ago
Comment removed
quanfa88 5 months ago
The similarities are probably due to the fact that both Wing Chun & Tyson were likely heavily influenced by 19th century bare-knuckle boxing (intro. to Southern China by the British), and sought a way for a short person to beat a tall person (on the inside). Wing Chun uses bare-knuckle techniques within a chi-based, kung fu framework, while Tyson uses the same techniques in a modern, Western boxing framework. They are not as different as might seem from casual observation.
quanfa88 5 months ago
@quanfa88 my thoughts exactly! People get so hung up on styles they dont realise wingchun is just following the universal principles that any good fighter will use.
zedsj 5 months ago
Comment removed
quanfa88 5 months ago
Comment removed
quanfa88 5 months ago
Comment removed
quanfa88 5 months ago
Comment removed
quanfa88 5 months ago
All the comparisons between Mike Tyson & Wing Chun are interesting. What no one seems to realize is that Tyson's boxing style is similar to Wing Chun. Both utilize short-range, compressed punches (their force stems from inch power & full body mechanics, rather than retraction & wide arcs), straight punches that appear circular (i.e. Tyson's uppercut vs Wing Chun's lifting punch), emphasize rooting (whether Tyson realizes it or not), & use rapid-fire combinations to the opponent's center.
quanfa88 5 months ago
Wing chun practitioners need to spend more time on sparring. I really dont see enough of it.
1NX9 9 months ago
Im an mma fighter and I learned my wing chun from SiFu Leung. Belive me the things he has tought me work and continue to work to this day!!! I have been in Bar fights street fights and now in the cage and it has not let me down!Boxing is great but if you add SiFu Duncans wing chun to it you'll be amazed. Just for a moment put this image in your mind... think about Mike Tyson and add SiFu Duncans wing chun to it.If this debate is going to happen then argue about the princeples!!!
manlalaban1 1 year ago
@manlalaban1 boy, a person like you should be able to end the debate! A foot in wing chun and a foot in MMA! All these fools should be set straight by your words. One can never be too thorough and should never assume there's nothing to be learned from another style! we should rejoice in our fellows' good points and assist where they might be lacking. But I guess that requires a degree of openness and honesty with one's self..
joedrock1 1 year ago
this debate will never end.who has the best styles etc...
to clear something up wing chun it is not a style.it is a fighting concept,a system.
you have the right to give an opinion if you are a professional fighter who has fought against a wing chun sifu.you guys see something in tv and believe it.
johnnybravo937 1 year ago
Hi my good friend. I don't want to make you feel bad, but unfortunately all of you are wrong. Wing Chung, or ving tzun or wing tsun whatever It is an internal martial art style. It has nothing g to do with sparring, strength and that kind of things. Maybe the wing Chung that you know my friends, it is the commercial version that China sold to the occidental world. The wing Chung that I know, it is soft and delicate but very dangerous, because it applies the internal power or Chi.
rchappa 2 years ago
My friend, Duncan Sikung Wing Chun is to feel not to see, sorry if we disagree.
Alachung58 2 years ago
@Alachung58 is that why bruce lee would cut right through any body he was a wing chun guy real roof top fights not a sport like boxing im not putin boxing down but bruce and wong shun leung were real fighters not sport
dolophinemej2 2 weeks ago
@rchappa LOL yeah, you can explain that to me when I threw a punch in your face. "oooh don't punch me, it's only internaaal" pff if you want to learn fighting: fight.
exorzy 2 years ago
If you are a truly wing Chung practitioner you will know the concept ¡s like internal styles. It does not mean no contact, it means the use of superior power to defeat you enemy without use only physical strength. If you can not understand that concept you should read more about it or take some lesson with real master
rchappa 2 years ago
overcome your enemy without physical strength only doesn't mean that you can learn it without hard training AND withouth sparring. you need strength, you need fighting experience. What if your enemy also has some fighting experience?
how you wanna applicate the "soft" wingchun you practice if you never tried it? do you think it will "just work" or what?
exorzy 2 years ago
@exorzy I love when people speak on things they don't know. I have done many different martial arts, trained in boxing and kickboxing as well. By far wing chun is the most effective art I've ever studied. I attend a place called "Wing chun boxing academy". Key word Boxing. Just so you know. Wing chun is a mother art which most fighting styles have come from to include boxing. All the punches, slips, etc. is all in wing chun. Don't get wrapped up in the BS you see on youtube.
RydinDubs 1 year ago
@RydinDubs And I hate when people speak about things they don't know. Dude I do Wing Chun myself and I never said there is no punches etc. in Wingchun, WTF? I just said if you want to be good at Wing Chun, you have to train hard what means: Fighting Drills and Sparring. Theese things requires strength, stamina, timing and a feeling fro distance. If you do know any little thing about boxing, I bet you agree. So where is the problem?
exorzy 1 year ago
@exorzy I never said you said there is no punches. Train hard I agree and I also agree with the timing and distance. I don't agree with the strength or stamina part though. Unless you meant internal strength? As far stamina, well let me ask you this. Have you ever slammed you fingers in a door. Well how much stamina did the door need to hurt your fingers. Better yet how about a male lion who just eats, sleeps and screws. How much stamina does he need to kill you?
RydinDubs 1 year ago
@RydinDubs Well I guess a lion has a lot of stamina :) Okay maybe we should hold streetfighting and tournamentfighting apart. Maybee for streetfighting, stamina isn't that important. But it is for tournament fighting (which I do with wingchun). The same for strength. It's not about raw, uncontrolled power, but fighting always needs power. Unfortunately u're not made of wood, so if someone slamms you with their finger, it's quite possible that you're the one getting hurt... ;-)
exorzy 1 year ago
@exorzy No a lion doesn't need stamina he just does what is natural. Fighting is fighting, its about the individual not the situation. You'll never see a true master(for lack of a better word) in a tournament because he doen't have to prove himself to anyone but himself. If you really study wing chun then you should know that all the power you need is given to you by your opponent. Unfortunately like most society has tainted you mind. Us and wood are made up of the same basic things.
RydinDubs 1 year ago
@rchappa
My friend, you are funny with you "internal power" and your "Chi" (it's Qi actually, I live in China). All martial art is about speed, power and timing. Go figure.
DaXia333 1 year ago
and that is typical of how people see wing chun. "soft" and "deadly" etc. there is many aspect and approach that practitioner may explore, such as, if im not mistaken, GM tsui shung ting (internal&structural aproach), GM wong shun leung (a lot of things=practical ) etc. here sifu duncan leung know the original form, or so i call it, taught by yip man and try to ake different approach. the first time i know wing chun i also think like this.
sild123 1 year ago
@rchappa Wing Chun cannot be defined. You learn the base, then the rest is up to you. But, you can't learn the base by sitting around meditating to Buddha. Not sure what the hell you are talking about.
WingChunLover2 1 year ago
@rchappa good aswer!!!
johnmaraschino 1 year ago
@rchappa sure there is an internal aspect to it--but what good is it if you have not learned how to apply it in fighting situations--such as sparring? Internal or External--it's still a fighting art and you have to fight/spar to know how to use it, otherwise you'll be all nerves, and you might find out that your opponent isn't going to "let" you do anything if he/she can help it. You need both if you really want to understand how the style works.
vaumbee 8 months ago
As an aside, I did just see Sifu Duncan in a restaurant a few weeks ago with my own sifu eating crab legs. I see him periodically when he shoots into town (VA Beach), but mostly he spends his time oversea's "conducting business". when i saw him a few years ago, he was training a san da team in china somewhere, i believe he may have had Steve Faulker with him at the time. My personal experience with him is that he's clearly very dedicated to wing chun, but would never assert that it's "the best".
jowmysteri 2 years ago
and yes, i have - short and sweet.
and if you ever actually get into a the fight, and have been taught by duncan or trained any his predecssors - larry or alan lee or wayne or gordon or chris b, you will figure out quick that you will not be using any fancy joint locking in any fight situation -if you think that's wing chun - you watch too many movies
klmadrigal 2 years ago
cont..
what you figure out is learning how to use everything else that is taught in full senior training, sparring, cirlcle. how to minimize yourself as a target, but take a punch and pain while delivering one. And how drive one punch one kill thought mentality from power training and shock ups - how to not stop until you've freaking crushed some dude with just the basics.
klmadrigal 2 years ago
hey, i'm not promoting that i can even say that i know how to fight, because i was just a student plus, i knew someone always is tougher, stronger and knows more. but, if you were lucky to train chun with duncan and others like him it was not about sticky hands (that's a reaction drill anyways) - if you train with these guys - it's humility to know you are with some great street fighters, but you got enough to get by if you ever had to.
klmadrigal 2 years ago
LMFAO apparently "mrharoldb" has'nt read the book about Sifu Duncan's no-bullshit fight episodes where he explains about street fighting via using his REAL applied WingChun he learned str8 from Yip Man or has'nt even met the dude in the first place to even say all this crap to his face, man people don't realize the true fuckin' power of GENUINE Kungfu. WingChun is one the most tampered with styles of Kungfu there is that's why people don't believe it, but Duncan is the REAL DEAL no joke!!!
mfeld418 2 years ago
You've pretty much mentioned most of the stuff they teach you in boxing aswell:
"senior training, sparring, cirlcle. how to minimize yourself as a target, but take a punch and pain while delivering one. And how drive one punch".
mrharoldb 2 years ago
Hey mrharoldb, unfortunately it's always a slippery slope arguement (x vs y), like saying "ali vs tyson" etc.. more fun to think about than reasonable. but to these guys' point, you did just say it yourself,"sparring, circle, etc"... pugilism is pugilism, nothing less special about one than another. the man proves himself, not the style. the like Usain Bolt doesn't prove Reeboks are better than Nike's on the track (silly arguement).
jowmysteri 2 years ago
i really doubt this would help in a real fight, i mean come on, seriously? have a look at REAL FIGHTS on youtube and see where you could apply wing chun. if you want to learn to defend yourself, BOXING is the most effective. being able to knock out your opponent with one punch is way more useful in a real fight than all of this WING CHUN stuff.
Think about it. could any of these guys beat MIKE TYSON
mrharoldb 2 years ago
and you can fight with Mike Tyson?
Alachung58 2 years ago
ur missing the point. i'm not saying i can beat mike tyson, i'm saying i really don't think a wing chun master could beat mike tyson.
mrharoldb 2 years ago
@Alachung58 brother i truly feel that if applied right, any style of fighting is effective rather it be boxing or martial arts."it's not what you know but how you apply it",that makes a method dangerous........
civicnation113 1 year ago
yeah...obviously,
you don't know what you are talking about
klmadrigal 2 years ago
Oh yeah? Have you ever been in a real fight? Well i have and when ur in that situation you don't remember all those fancy joint locking techniques and so on u just want to punch them as hard and as fast as you can. Honestly i'm not trying to be a prat i'm just saying if you really want to defend yourself in a fight boxing is the most useful. watch some other real fights on youtube and see where you could use wing chun.
mrharoldb 2 years ago
Too many movies.
TV makes American brains soft.
williamwilson666 2 years ago
I'm NOT american.
mrharoldb 2 years ago
All the worse you have been mistaken for one in that event.
williamwilson666 2 years ago
Don't bring race into the matter, this is meant to be a debate on fighting styles not an excuse for insulting someone's nationallity. Bring something useful to the converstion instead of trying to be clever.
mrharoldb 2 years ago
So you are suggesting by adding something to the discussion which I considered to be "unclever" would aid it?
Doesn't sound like my sort of discussion I'm afraid. But do enjoy yourself, regardless.
williamwilson666 2 years ago
i will thankyou
mrharoldb 2 years ago
Duncan Leong has fought with western boxers and practitioners of other MA. On one occasion, he fought with a boxing instructor but strangely the guy agreed to fight but asked that no kicking allowed. He ended up in hospital with a cracked skull. Wing chunners fight dirty. Look up Boer and wing chun on youtube. Alternatively, have a sparring engagement with any wing chun instructor and just spar to find out. No rules.
erwinsoo2 2 years ago
To be fair, please compare with a wing chun practitioner with the muscular strength, weight and size of mike and whose training and conditioning is similar. btw wing chun applications are not those drills and sticky hand stuff you see on youtube. The historical intent of this art was to assasinate and silence imperial officers or defend against armed soldiers.
erwinsoo2 2 years ago
@mrharoldb its kinda simple, reduce mike tyson to the about 50kg and you would realise that perhaps you have a fair chance of winning him too..=))
thorsten139 1 year ago
@mrharoldb I assume you have some experience to back this claim up? Wing chun is easily applied to a street fight scenario. And a wing chun master would destroy most modern fighters, boxing, ufc mma etc. One of the main principles in the inch punch. Being able to finish your opponant within an inch. Not a hung haymaker from tyson that ip man would parry and deliever 80 punches to his center line before he could think of biting him.
jkantner152 1 year ago
@mrharoldb Maybe not. But Mike is a professional athlete. But don't write Duncan off either. Mike would not really have a good handle on low line kicks, or much idea how to defend his groin.
Godsmasher22 10 months ago
@mrharoldb there's a lot more to wing chun than chisau. at first it's soft, but then you learn how to work with force too. it's just a skill--it doesn't equate to fighting. Duncan has said the same thing. There is plenty of plain old hard stuff to bust up your opponent that we spend a lot of time learning. but learning how to relax (not have tension) can be very useful. you'll react faster. Don't think that youtube videos show you everything. they don't.
vaumbee 8 months ago
@mrharoldb mike tyson trains very hard to get where he's at. and as he gets older he loses his power. Wingchun is designed for the long term. I know severel people who could beat ike tyson simply because they use kicks, something a boxer cannot defend against
zedsj 5 months ago
@mrharoldb it is clear that you have no idea what wing tsun is and completely unknown its principles and techniques. besides have you ever crossed with Mike Tyson on the street? mike tyson was a professional boxer and is not a point of reference for the average person. Wing Chun was created for ordinary people. and finally, yes. duncan leung can beat mike tyson in a street fight . I did boxing for 8 years. I know what I say. boxing is a sport and street fighting is completely different
tutanota 4 months ago
@mrharoldb typical cockiness of a boxer. bruce lee would have kick the shit out of Tyson. watch "young bruce lee"(movie) and it explains the difference between a ring match and a real fight.
bboyrocker83 2 months ago
@mrharoldb brother its not all about boxing or wing chun its all about practicality today we have got ufc mma boxing muay thai y these guys dont fight these fighters and prove y don't they atleast challenge....... watching bruce lee in movies and showing moves on u tube is not superiority..........if they cant fight they should better stop misleading ppl in the name of such arts like wing chung and jkd
muaythamti 2 months ago
I wish a could afford to train under this sifu...!!
Pradiip79 2 years ago
master Duncan Leung is great
formlessdragon 3 years ago
Duncan Leung is the best WC Master!
He can prove it!
02SJCHEFE 3 years ago
Against who, Lo Man Kam? Who else?
arosajas 2 years ago
Duncan Leung is one of five students from Ip Man who learned the complete Wing Chun with private lessons. Learn more about him, buy your dvd's, will not regret.
02SJCHEFE 2 years ago
does he still teach in va beach? I'd love to be his student again
ShawnsPerspective 3 years ago
Duncan is a fuckin' beast!!
mfeld418 3 years ago
my old sifu!
stacyhawaii2011 3 years ago
Mine as well.
sifupr 3 years ago
master Duncan Leung
mpeterson007 3 years ago