its obvious were al feeling alitte couped up from 7 billion people on earth, lets all grab a nuke and make some space while spitting curses then when we al get the big picture we'll say hi in 100 years.... unfortunaty it may be too late.... oh well we all had it comin ami right? :D
@dccmpbll probably because the Teutonic Order evolved into Prussia, then into German empire and then into Nazi Germany and then someone brought up WWII?
ummm you realize that japan was training all of its civilians and stockpiling military equipment on the mainland preparing for an invasion right??? In my opinion 2 atom bombs killing a few hundred thousand were much better than us actually invading into the mainland and having to shoot any fanatic that charged at us. Sorry i can't stand it whenever people don't understand the war fully. The people in america are fine, its the government that fucks everyone.
@gamergamer15 Japan had a serious food shortage and no fuel to speak of. The nation would collapse in a matter of months. Even so, it was more mercyfull to nuke 300 000 citizen, more would have probably diead in starvation. However, my point is. Nukes was not necessary to win.
what i dislike about youtube discussions is how often they lapse into comments with 99% insults and 1% of easily disproven "facts". it's like they actually just WANT to get into a fit of rage and fling insults=/
@zillafire101 then go on and compare the templars and hospitallers along with them oh and of course the whole catholic church the things the teutonics did was not right but it doesnt stand out in any way to the things that were going on in europe during that time
continued: to defeat us based on our apparent econimic shittyness. and u can argue against every american, u may even argue against me, but also realize that not all americans have the same viewpoint. we have people that love america, people that hate america, and people who just dont care because to be perfectly honest the living conditions here are better than many places in the world (although this too is changing). thank you for ur time if have read all of this.
TOO ALL: america does not suck as much as u make it out to be. yes we have recently had extremely assholish presidents (george bush), aswell as many of them in the past (harry truman: the guy that used the nukes, big mistake). many people in america hate what we have done in the world in the name of "freedom and democracy, wjich we have severely limited in places like iran and egypt (until very recently). while our army is impressive, there are other countries that now have the capability
@Retillias Oh and your saying that the ONLY way japan would have lost if it was nuked? they were going to surrender, and look at japan now, they are in a more better position then they were when the bombs fell, which has let them rebuild into a great nation, maybe america needs a nuking, let them rebuild from the cesspool they are right now
@Maergensargoth One of the worst ideas out of all the bad ideas in history. America getting nuked would only prompt them to do the same to what other nations has done so. Japan wasn't nuked, it was hit by an atomic bomb. There are weapons far more powerful than nukes nowadays.
@necrontyr1800 One of the worst ideas out of all the bad ideas in history. America getting nuked would only prompt them to do the same to what other nations has done so. Japan wasn't nuked, it was hit by an atomic bomb. There are weapons far more powerful than nukes nowadays.
@necrontyr1800 Not what I'm saying. I'm saying that the Nuclear Bomb has effectively ended the possibility of another "World War", which is a good thing. But if America hadn't used those nukes, then maybe another country would have in the future. Their introduction was ideal. It's better to end a war with two nukes than to start a war with a hundred...
@necrontyr1800 IMO, anybody who seriously thinks any country needs to be nuked is just a fucking psycho, even if it's "for the greater good". Just saying.
@necrontyr1800 america had his 9/11, that lead them into a patriotic war effort against some bizarre enemy, resulting only on thousands of deaths and oil company profits.
USA would never attacker their Western Europe allies. USA always avoided single confrontation against major nations, they always had numerous puppets or would join a global scale war when they realized victory was undeniable. The US Army was no match to the Wehrmacht, without the Eastern Front it is reasonable to say they would get their asses beaten to Washington DC in a few time, Germany was way superior to any army at the time, they only lacked proper planning. Russia is no place to play.
@febertotti Germany was unable to defeat the British on the British Isle; a mere channel of water away. The Luftwaffe was unable to defeat the RAF. It is conceivable that the British may be able to hold a German invasion for a considerable amount of time. Invading USA an ocean away, against probably the second best Navy of its time (after Japanese) was probably a dream.
Even if let's say Germany had taken Britain, the inevitable is Berlin would have been hit by nuclear bomb.
@ImEternalWanderer Let's say Britain would have fallen, nothing impossible, without a foothold on Europe, N Africa, no support from the USSR, no RAF and Royal Navy, it was unlikely that Berlin would be hit by the Americans, but that's a lot of 'ifs' and nothing changes the past. I'm just stating that in a fair fight Wehrmacht was unlikely to be beaten by any of its contemporary armies, as in both World Wars the allies had to overwhelm the Germans with sheer numbers, particularly in Russia.
@febertotti and that's where you get it incorrect.
There is no "fair" in war. In war, you do absolutely everything possible to win or to survive. As some modern soldiers put it: if you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.
@ImEternalWanderer I see your point, but I imagine you understood what I meant, that the Wehrmacht represented what the US army does nowadays. Thus a megalomaniac leader wasted such a brilliant force, fortunately I must say.
@ImEternalWanderer Germany did not want to risk heavy casualties taking the British isles. Hitler was more concerned about eliminating communism than anything else, not only that but the vast resources of Siberia would have been a great asset to his empire, but he failed. I mean if the Soviet Union was eliminated, Germany would start launching V2 rockets at London and any major city in Britain. They were already developing them throughout the war, all they needed was time.
@Unit987654321 Assuming Hitler had been able to defeat the Soviet Union; or forced it into a peace negotiation, a more reasonable outcome with the Brits would be another peace treaty. Launching V2s with standard warheads accomplishes nothing, only to push the Brits to fight harder and potentially dragging Americans in. Using his victories as a bargaining chip will be a lot better.
BUT, Hitler was a terrible strategist. He might have been a bright and charismatic politician ....
Make no mistake, his generals, officers and soldiers were excellent. The problem is while being bad at it Hitler tried to force his decision into everything and screwed up everything. The Stalingrad debacle is one example.
Stalin had the same problem initially. Later he learned to only give some general directives and let his generals do the rest. His generals then did the job splendidly.
@ImEternalWanderer The main mistake for Hitler was he went for Moscow first instead of Stalingrad. IF he went for Stalingrad first I would either not exist or I would be speaking German, but most likely not exist. As for launching V2's, that would have worked great for Hitler, while his troops cross the channel he can be bombarding the British defences, taking out airfields leaving them almost defenceless, as for the Americans they would not have stood a chance against Germany.
@Unit987654321 It doesn't really matter which way Hitler went because while his fighting force was great, his logistic force was terrible.
The German army rolling into Europe had to confiscate petrol from civilians. When they roll into Russia, they had to be resupplied animal-drawn peasant carts. Panzer divisions rolling ahead had to pause to wait for the infantry divisions (in scare trucks) and their supply. Tanks broke down so much that a Panzer division commander 20 miles ...
@Unit987654321 ... away from Moscow had a handful of tanks because the rest (250+) are not operational.
The fighting force is certainly superb, but the supplying is just bad. Tanks broke down in Western Europe had to be pulled back to Germany for repairs (a big no-no in high tempo blitzkrieg).
In contrast, American force is average at fighting, but their supply is infinitely better. Soviet force, during their long counter-attack demonstrate excellence in both.
@ImEternalWanderer This is why Stalingrad was a crucial battle of the war, that city linked all the railroads in the area and would have served as a massive supply dump for the German army. Now had Hitler attacked Stalingrad first, he would have had almost no problems in logistics.
1) the track width is incompatible with German's trains
2) Capturing of Russian trains weren't very profitable: the Russian would've drag them off or destroy them. There were also frequent attacks on rail tracks by Russian insurgents.
3) If you heavily rely on rail tracks with weak means to transport them away from the rail heads, the enemy would instantly know which area you are weak and attack those and avoid strong points
@Unit987654321 and the problem in logistics manifested in the Western Europe campaign, as I said: repairs had to be done in Germany, Panzer units had to confiscate petrols from civilians. Tanks had to be drawn by animals to save fuel.
It's just that the campaign was over so fast, so quickly that the new doctrine was vindicated. Problems were not seen or solved.
Success is sometimes a curse while failures can be good teachers.
@Unit987654321 After reading a while, I can definitely say that despite dashing propaganda of motorization of the Panzer and infantry division, the majority of the German army had to be supplied by horse drawn rubber wheeled carts. These can go at best 32 km a day from the last rail head; and you can't even do with too many days in a row (2-3 at best).
You can't resupply a column of tanks with a column of horse drawn vehicles.
@ImEternalWanderer Yes, however German did captured Soviet trains and used them on the tracks, capturing Stalingrad would have allowed the German South armies to be very well supplied.
@febertotti Remember that the whole nuclear bomb business was pretty much "Jewish". Which was the reason Germany could not get a bomb of their own.
Other than that Germany, Italy and Japan had a inferior strategical position: resource, manpower, etc ... comparing to the vast Soviet Union, China, British colony (all the way to India) and the USA. If it were possible at all, the world would have been ruled by a few major empires long before Hitler was born.
@SuperThecrap Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the only two cities that comes to mind concerning nuking, and those were atomic bombs, not nukes. No one has used nukes on other nations. Other than Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United States has gone to war on foot with guns and tanks against other nations.
@CosmicGrounds still atomic bombs suck only cowards and savages use it.the war is fought by soldiers but many civillians die unnecessary with atomic bombs
@SuperThecrap Who else has used atomic bombs on other countries since you're stating that cowards and savages use them, being plural? Regarding atomic bombs killing innocent civilians, do you not realize that many civilians die regardless of how a war is fought, even if it's swords and arrows?
@CosmicGrounds you can spare or end someones life swiftly like that but it takes effort.it doesnt take effort to press a button and making innocents lives miserable
@SuperThecrap Well, I see you've ignored my first question. Concerning my second question answered, no one has pushed a button to drop and atomic bomb. America, dropped a bomb, more like rolled it out of an airplane onto Japan. But, despite that one war, America are still a coward to you, despite the many other wars Americans fought on foot against their enemies. Why do I have a feeling that you're just bigoted toward Americans?
@CosmicGrounds oh the first one? I dont know about that exactly the only one I know is america.and does it matter if america sent that bomb from a plane or a button?the damage is still the same.also when other countries dont agree with them they are counted terrorists.the media keeps talking about how americans are heroes while they kill alot of civillians in iraq.americans would run away from a real fight if they didnt had those "drugs" during fights.
@SuperThecrap Well, if you don't know what nation other than America has dropped bombs onto enemy nations, then you shouldn't even be posting such comments. So because of one situation where a bomb is dropped, you disregard the other wars that heavily outnumber the atomic bomb battle? You've still avoided to answer the last question in my other post. I don't recall America ever refer to the British, French, or Germans as terrorists before in history.
@CosmicGrounds close to terrorists.look at cuba,soviet russia and others for example.they are called maniacs.americunts are no heroes like they say.anyway I got different things to do.good bye
@SuperThecrap You're just a hater of America, while we have our problems, we're still better than the country you reside in. According to your logic every nation on Earth is responsible for calling others names other than, "enemy" as thus makes them cowards and other derogatory words that you mention.
@CosmicGrounds wtf are u 2 arguing about. seriously stop being childish. America is cool but i heard it sucks to live their if ur not rich so can't be that good.....
@AlexiusMoore Speaking of childish, why don't scroll down and see for yourself instead of making a spectacle of yourself. I'm middle class and I can say while I wish my life was better it's a great place to live, so what you have heard is only the opinion of someone else.
@CosmicGrounds not really.but Im not going to start a long discussion about my countries nice people and brave army.sadly our government does suck right now.he is an american lover.and I dont know why you would justify nukes and such
@gucci13 That is what he was saying. The USA cannot destroy Europe. The simply can't. It is not possibly for the US. Let's say hypothetically that they did launch a nuke or something toward Europe, China and North Korea would find that as a gateway to unleash hell on America, thus the UN and North Korea or China would silence the USA. Hypothetically of course.
@robbie4233334 i think launching 300 nukes at the sametime targeted at the most strategic places in mainland europe in a most unexpected day will do the job. you can say china and N.K all you want but you see our target is only to destroy europe which is the argument here. always possible and there is always a way..we can even hire terrorist groups or leftist group to our aid..all of that without europe knowing.
@gucci13 No, he idiocy of that statement is astounding. 300 nukes in one place would not only destroy the countries, but the earth. The USA cannot destroy Europe. Why? Because there will be Americans high up in administration that will stop it, and the fact that the nukes would be intercepted. There is no way. The ISS would report the sighting, the UN would respond as soon as possible, and with either a missile defense system, or fighter planes would detonate the nuke in the air.
Hi, if you like instrumental music you might like our new guitar/violin/cello trio. Search 'the fugitive soar medieval' if you're interested. thanks from SOAR
@MitchC92 Oh yeah! You're right, they did because they were a Catholic organization! I had forgotten that. But I retain the opinion that they had similar hobbies of going out east to rape and massacre some Slavs.
@silentsurvivor2011 lol shows how much you know about nazis and the teutonic order the teutonic order has NOTHING to do with the nazis' ideals of a superior human race the 'only' thing they did or tried to achieve was to establish a christian state on the balcan peninsula you are obviously one of those ignorant persons who associate everything that's german with nazis
@TwilightLink293 Actually, the Teutonic order became a racket. They didn't even try to convert great portions of their population into Christianity, because the Pagan presence attracted rich noblemen from all over the Europe, who paid the order to "fight Pagans". All the Teutonics did was to destabilize the region with this practice. They were unnecessary and harmful in that regard, as the Lithuanians would have probably converted faster without the order, the Christian pressure was too vast.
@Varyalover True that! ;) European history has always been in the center of human history! No other place has it happened so much in 2000 years as in Europe! xD Proud to be european :P hehe
@Khristophoros1001 Don't get me wrong, I have taken to liking the history of a couple other continents, but the european history was always more dramatic, yet interesting and entertaining. More things happen, it relates to countries we'd like to know more about (for instance, if you came from Great Britain, you'd rather know about the kingdom of England than the warring periods of China or so)
A combination of what happened then and your own preferences helps this
@AlexiusMoore I don't agree! I don't think China and the middle-east has such an interesting history as Europe. Middle-eastern history was interesting at the time of the Crusades and again after 1948 when Israel was created. But in between those time periods the Middle-east have been really boring.
@Khristophoros1001 thats ur opinion, but it seems u only see the middle east from europes prospective. Like crusades when europeans where involved and again 1948 when europe got involved again. but there were so many other things going on there at other periods in time, its not boring at all, especially when they had a 1000 year head start in conflicts as compared to europe
@Varyalover@Lordsebastian101 Umh... looks like tou are european too XDDD. In fact my favourite strategy gam of all times is M2TW, in fact I still play sometimes to Kingdoms expansion or Stainless Steel 6.4, thats why I don't need a new Medieval yet, because I'm still playing M2TW.
Opposed to it, I love Roman history and Rome 1 is really outdated by now, almost hurts to see the graphics and animations and I dont know almost ANYTHING about China, son it might be interesting (or at least freash).
@gunner38ED I'm actually a yank that has studied extensively into European history (And argued with the history teacher numourous times about the biased revolustionary war and war of 1812, which are extremely anti-british)
@Varyalover Yes they are, many people do not realize that not all American colonists won the Revolutionary War(It should not even be called that because it has no characteristics of a Revolution). The Royalists who did not want to break away from the king lost the war and there were as many Royalists as there were Patriots. And not to mention the way the Revolution was started!
@HeirOfWallachia Yes, it was more of a civil war than anything else, IF that. So basiaclly the fathers of my country were greedy bastards- They were pissed at the proclomation which was to prevent wars- they wouldn't fight the wars themselves, and wouldn't pay the british govornment for protection.
It pisses me off, the history. I have NEVER read ANYTHING as biased!
@Varyalover The fathers of your country acted pretty much like everyone else in charge at that time. Great Britain was no saint, look at what they did to the Netherlands during that time period. The UK's lack of respect for any other nation's merchant fleet threatened to drag an alliance of Denmark, Sweden, and Russia into the war against them while they were already fighting Spain, France, the Colonies, and the Netherlands.
Everyone involved was quite greedy if you ask me.
@AdmrScheer No. The fools of my countr didn't act on 'freedom', but on power and greed. Great Britain, was run by and descended from, literelly, saints. You seem to misunderstand theway they treated other merchants, as business is business, and it wasn't Great Britain, but simply British merchants.
@Varyalover The Royal Navy and UK-sanctioned privateers (not merchants) would molest non-beligerant merchant vessels hurting both their enemies' economies and that of neutral nations.
If Great Britain was so 'saintly', why is it that they could not elicit a single European ally during the American Revolution but could find a continent of enemies?
I have nothing against the UK, but they acted on their own interests like every other nation.
Does anyone know where to get this song for mp3 (legally, of course)? I wouldn't want to rob the makers of their fair share, and this song is just too good not to have.
Religion and faith was diffrent in those days. People don't care much about fantasies nowadays, but in these times, the gods were watching you with every strike you lay, every child you slay, and every penny you gave. Name and honour was everything here, something we lack now as well. I have ancestors running in the German Order, but I don't care what they did wrong. Their lives are over and I am here to make the diffrence between their mistakes. Helfen, Wehren, Heilen= their motto.
0:00 TheBattle is about to begin, both armies marching towards each other 0:45 Archers and artillery opening fire... 1:30 High casualties on both sides 2:00 Reinforcements have arrived on the battlefield 2:55 The slaughtering is still going 3:29 Cavalry prepares for a Charge 3:51 Cavalry charges the flanks of the enemy formations, 4:37 Many Troops are shaken and are about to flee 4:55 Cavalry hunts fleeing enemies 5:21 Victory for the superiors... :P
i wonder why every total war series soundtracks are predominantly watched by men and all the comments seem a bit neerdy. maybe i should get a girlfriend to compensate my gaming...
ONE TURD SAYS SUMTHING DUMB, THEN THAT MESSES EVERYTHING UP
MCbtYou 4 days ago
Everyone who keeps talking bout nazis, Hitler, and WW2, GTFO of this video andgo troll in another forumn, kiddies!
TheTank1110 1 week ago 2
@FinisGloriaeMundi Yep he's fucked. Over half of my infantry will die in any given battle. I only protect my archers and cav.
Gakeon143 2 weeks ago
Long live GERMANY!
ShadowNighthunterDJB 2 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
Teutonic Order: Time to get shit done. 4th Guy to the Left: Oh look at the lovely Ground!
Gakeon143 2 weeks ago 5
@Gakeon143 He's obviously depressed
Retillias 2 weeks ago
@Gakeon143 More like: $hit, I just got this shirt cleaned.
FinisGloriaeMundi 2 weeks ago
Medieval Nazis! :D
conan263 4 weeks ago
@Conan263 You're a fucking moron you know that?
VolvenIV 3 weeks ago
@VolvenIV
True.
MarekKrassus53 3 weeks ago
@VolvenIV But he is right :D Medieval nazis
AlekPL0 2 days ago
@AlekPL0 No he is not right, and you are a fucking moron for thinking that every german is a Nazi, now shut up
VolvenIV 2 days ago
@VolvenIV Ok ok please don't kill me herr deutschland. ;)
AlekPL0 2 days ago
@AlekPL0 Cool education bro.
Parkerkun 6 hours ago
@conan263 hahaha you really stupid!!!
DerByzantiner 2 days ago
why some of the youtubers are so dumb...
ImperialEarthEmpire 4 weeks ago 25
@ImperialEarthEmpire
There are idiots online in plentifulness
Juanchopepe86 2 weeks ago
@ImperialEarthEmpire because being dumb at their home and real life is just not enough ;)
zeonb 2 weeks ago
@ImperialEarthEmpire just so you can say that, all apart of the grand play, yet poorly orchistrated.
TroLLIncTM 6 days ago
its obvious were al feeling alitte couped up from 7 billion people on earth, lets all grab a nuke and make some space while spitting curses then when we al get the big picture we'll say hi in 100 years.... unfortunaty it may be too late.... oh well we all had it comin ami right? :D
TroLLIncTM 1 month ago
why are we arguing about WW2 Japan in a video about a soundtrack from a game about the medieval Teutonic Order?
dccmpbll 1 month ago 48
@dccmpbll probably because the Teutonic Order evolved into Prussia, then into German empire and then into Nazi Germany and then someone brought up WWII?
I have no idea.
ElemixZero 1 month ago
@ElemixZero Well, all internet discussions do eventually lead to Hitler, I guess.
dccmpbll 1 month ago
@dccmpbll He is, Der Fuhrer, after all ....
\Sieg Heil !!
Victissive 1 month ago
@ElemixZero The German Empire didn't evolve into Nazi Germany...
The fall of the Empire if anything was the reason for Nazi Germany.
stenavres 2 weeks ago
@stenavres Don't bother trying to argue with idiots man...
MilanKorr91 1 week ago
@dccmpbll (Say this just like Leonidas in 300) THIS...IS....YOU...TUBE!
krashly71 3 weeks ago
stop arguing over nations, all nations are as screwed up as the others, dont be so naive
Schism704 1 month ago
@Schism704 Exactly every nation has its flaws!
Dannebrog100 1 month ago
This is Medieval 2, not Shogun. Why the hell is all this talk going on about Japan and ww2? Just shut the hell up already.
MilanKorr91 1 month ago
Best song out of them all
SuperSupaSAIYAN 1 month ago in playlist More videos from TotalWarEra
@necrontyr1800
ummm you realize that japan was training all of its civilians and stockpiling military equipment on the mainland preparing for an invasion right??? In my opinion 2 atom bombs killing a few hundred thousand were much better than us actually invading into the mainland and having to shoot any fanatic that charged at us. Sorry i can't stand it whenever people don't understand the war fully. The people in america are fine, its the government that fucks everyone.
gamergamer15 1 month ago
@gamergamer15 Japan had a serious food shortage and no fuel to speak of. The nation would collapse in a matter of months. Even so, it was more mercyfull to nuke 300 000 citizen, more would have probably diead in starvation. However, my point is. Nukes was not necessary to win.
tyskbulle 1 month ago
what i dislike about youtube discussions is how often they lapse into comments with 99% insults and 1% of easily disproven "facts". it's like they actually just WANT to get into a fit of rage and fling insults=/
Rhonion 1 month ago
1:30 is my favorite part, i imagine so much with this theme
TroLLIncTM 1 month ago
I only compare Nazis and Teutonic Knights on one thing,they both killed thousands of Innosences for a stupid ideal.
zillafire101 1 month ago
@zillafire101 then go on and compare the templars and hospitallers along with them oh and of course the whole catholic church the things the teutonics did was not right but it doesnt stand out in any way to the things that were going on in europe during that time
TwilightLink293 1 month ago
Can you all please stop feeding the hate-mongering trolls and just enjoy the music?
AdmrScheer 1 month ago
continued: to defeat us based on our apparent econimic shittyness. and u can argue against every american, u may even argue against me, but also realize that not all americans have the same viewpoint. we have people that love america, people that hate america, and people who just dont care because to be perfectly honest the living conditions here are better than many places in the world (although this too is changing). thank you for ur time if have read all of this.
SuperVeloce178583 1 month ago 2
TOO ALL: america does not suck as much as u make it out to be. yes we have recently had extremely assholish presidents (george bush), aswell as many of them in the past (harry truman: the guy that used the nukes, big mistake). many people in america hate what we have done in the world in the name of "freedom and democracy, wjich we have severely limited in places like iran and egypt (until very recently). while our army is impressive, there are other countries that now have the capability
SuperVeloce178583 1 month ago
@SuperVeloce178583 If America didn't use those nukes, someone else would have...
Retillias 1 month ago
@Retillias Oh and your saying that the ONLY way japan would have lost if it was nuked? they were going to surrender, and look at japan now, they are in a more better position then they were when the bombs fell, which has let them rebuild into a great nation, maybe america needs a nuking, let them rebuild from the cesspool they are right now
necrontyr1800 1 month ago 2
@necrontyr1800 NUUUUUUUUUUKE America, please do!
Maergensargoth 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Maergensargoth One of the worst ideas out of all the bad ideas in history. America getting nuked would only prompt them to do the same to what other nations has done so. Japan wasn't nuked, it was hit by an atomic bomb. There are weapons far more powerful than nukes nowadays.
CosmicGrounds 1 month ago
@Maergensargoth Your an idotic retard who deserves death and no better....
DukeOfTennessee117 1 month ago
@Maergensargoth fuck you bitch we would nuke the shit out your shit little country
bombardus 1 month ago
@necrontyr1800 One of the worst ideas out of all the bad ideas in history. America getting nuked would only prompt them to do the same to what other nations has done so. Japan wasn't nuked, it was hit by an atomic bomb. There are weapons far more powerful than nukes nowadays.
CosmicGrounds 1 month ago
@necrontyr1800 Not what I'm saying. I'm saying that the Nuclear Bomb has effectively ended the possibility of another "World War", which is a good thing. But if America hadn't used those nukes, then maybe another country would have in the future. Their introduction was ideal. It's better to end a war with two nukes than to start a war with a hundred...
Retillias 1 month ago
@necrontyr1800 IMO, anybody who seriously thinks any country needs to be nuked is just a fucking psycho, even if it's "for the greater good". Just saying.
jesblabla 1 month ago
@necrontyr1800 america had his 9/11, that lead them into a patriotic war effort against some bizarre enemy, resulting only on thousands of deaths and oil company profits.
isildur69 1 month ago
@necrontyr1800 What the fuck those does that have to do with Medieval 2 Total War Kingdoms ?
ElemixZero 1 month ago
@necrontyr1800 Yes, I've been saying America should have been bombed instead, for more than a year now.
Victissive 1 month ago
@SuperVeloce178583 (Obama)
DukeOfTennessee117 1 month ago
@DukeOfTennessee117 okay yeah obama wasnt as effecive as everyone had hoped (hehe) but bush was preeeetty bad
SuperVeloce178583 1 month ago
Best orchestrated soundtrack heard in a videogame of all time
TempestDust 2 months ago
Strength and honour! <3
ArnuxsGaming 2 months ago
this song is so freakin manly
PandaSohei 2 months ago
USA would never attacker their Western Europe allies. USA always avoided single confrontation against major nations, they always had numerous puppets or would join a global scale war when they realized victory was undeniable. The US Army was no match to the Wehrmacht, without the Eastern Front it is reasonable to say they would get their asses beaten to Washington DC in a few time, Germany was way superior to any army at the time, they only lacked proper planning. Russia is no place to play.
febertotti 2 months ago
@febertotti Germany was unable to defeat the British on the British Isle; a mere channel of water away. The Luftwaffe was unable to defeat the RAF. It is conceivable that the British may be able to hold a German invasion for a considerable amount of time. Invading USA an ocean away, against probably the second best Navy of its time (after Japanese) was probably a dream.
Even if let's say Germany had taken Britain, the inevitable is Berlin would have been hit by nuclear bomb.
ImEternalWanderer 2 months ago
@ImEternalWanderer Let's say Britain would have fallen, nothing impossible, without a foothold on Europe, N Africa, no support from the USSR, no RAF and Royal Navy, it was unlikely that Berlin would be hit by the Americans, but that's a lot of 'ifs' and nothing changes the past. I'm just stating that in a fair fight Wehrmacht was unlikely to be beaten by any of its contemporary armies, as in both World Wars the allies had to overwhelm the Germans with sheer numbers, particularly in Russia.
febertotti 2 months ago
@febertotti and that's where you get it incorrect.
There is no "fair" in war. In war, you do absolutely everything possible to win or to survive. As some modern soldiers put it: if you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.
ImEternalWanderer 2 months ago
Comment removed
febertotti 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ImEternalWanderer I see your point, but I imagine you understood what I meant, that the Wehrmacht represented what the US army does nowadays. Thus a megalomaniac leader wasted such a brilliant force, fortunately I must say.
febertotti 2 months ago
@ImEternalWanderer Germany did not want to risk heavy casualties taking the British isles. Hitler was more concerned about eliminating communism than anything else, not only that but the vast resources of Siberia would have been a great asset to his empire, but he failed. I mean if the Soviet Union was eliminated, Germany would start launching V2 rockets at London and any major city in Britain. They were already developing them throughout the war, all they needed was time.
Unit987654321 2 months ago
@Unit987654321 Assuming Hitler had been able to defeat the Soviet Union; or forced it into a peace negotiation, a more reasonable outcome with the Brits would be another peace treaty. Launching V2s with standard warheads accomplishes nothing, only to push the Brits to fight harder and potentially dragging Americans in. Using his victories as a bargaining chip will be a lot better.
BUT, Hitler was a terrible strategist. He might have been a bright and charismatic politician ....
ImEternalWanderer 2 months ago
@Unit987654321 ... but really really bad at strategy.
Make no mistake, his generals, officers and soldiers were excellent. The problem is while being bad at it Hitler tried to force his decision into everything and screwed up everything. The Stalingrad debacle is one example.
Stalin had the same problem initially. Later he learned to only give some general directives and let his generals do the rest. His generals then did the job splendidly.
ImEternalWanderer 2 months ago
@ImEternalWanderer The main mistake for Hitler was he went for Moscow first instead of Stalingrad. IF he went for Stalingrad first I would either not exist or I would be speaking German, but most likely not exist. As for launching V2's, that would have worked great for Hitler, while his troops cross the channel he can be bombarding the British defences, taking out airfields leaving them almost defenceless, as for the Americans they would not have stood a chance against Germany.
Unit987654321 2 months ago
@Unit987654321 It doesn't really matter which way Hitler went because while his fighting force was great, his logistic force was terrible.
The German army rolling into Europe had to confiscate petrol from civilians. When they roll into Russia, they had to be resupplied animal-drawn peasant carts. Panzer divisions rolling ahead had to pause to wait for the infantry divisions (in scare trucks) and their supply. Tanks broke down so much that a Panzer division commander 20 miles ...
ImEternalWanderer 2 months ago
@Unit987654321 ... away from Moscow had a handful of tanks because the rest (250+) are not operational.
The fighting force is certainly superb, but the supplying is just bad. Tanks broke down in Western Europe had to be pulled back to Germany for repairs (a big no-no in high tempo blitzkrieg).
In contrast, American force is average at fighting, but their supply is infinitely better. Soviet force, during their long counter-attack demonstrate excellence in both.
ImEternalWanderer 2 months ago
@ImEternalWanderer This is why Stalingrad was a crucial battle of the war, that city linked all the railroads in the area and would have served as a massive supply dump for the German army. Now had Hitler attacked Stalingrad first, he would have had almost no problems in logistics.
Unit987654321 2 months ago
@Unit987654321 3 problems with railroads in Russia:
1) the track width is incompatible with German's trains
2) Capturing of Russian trains weren't very profitable: the Russian would've drag them off or destroy them. There were also frequent attacks on rail tracks by Russian insurgents.
3) If you heavily rely on rail tracks with weak means to transport them away from the rail heads, the enemy would instantly know which area you are weak and attack those and avoid strong points
ImEternalWanderer 2 months ago
@Unit987654321 and the problem in logistics manifested in the Western Europe campaign, as I said: repairs had to be done in Germany, Panzer units had to confiscate petrols from civilians. Tanks had to be drawn by animals to save fuel.
It's just that the campaign was over so fast, so quickly that the new doctrine was vindicated. Problems were not seen or solved.
Success is sometimes a curse while failures can be good teachers.
ImEternalWanderer 2 months ago
@Unit987654321 After reading a while, I can definitely say that despite dashing propaganda of motorization of the Panzer and infantry division, the majority of the German army had to be supplied by horse drawn rubber wheeled carts. These can go at best 32 km a day from the last rail head; and you can't even do with too many days in a row (2-3 at best).
You can't resupply a column of tanks with a column of horse drawn vehicles.
ImEternalWanderer 2 months ago
@ImEternalWanderer Yes, however German did captured Soviet trains and used them on the tracks, capturing Stalingrad would have allowed the German South armies to be very well supplied.
Unit987654321 2 months ago
@febertotti Remember that the whole nuclear bomb business was pretty much "Jewish". Which was the reason Germany could not get a bomb of their own.
Other than that Germany, Italy and Japan had a inferior strategical position: resource, manpower, etc ... comparing to the vast Soviet Union, China, British colony (all the way to India) and the USA. If it were possible at all, the world would have been ruled by a few major empires long before Hitler was born.
ImEternalWanderer 2 months ago
Comment removed
febertotti 2 months ago
@febertotti what does usa have to do with teutonics?
SuperThecrap 2 months ago
@SuperThecrap A lot my friend
febertotti 2 months ago
@febertotti well teutonics might have been savages like usa but they werent cowards.
SuperThecrap 2 months ago
@SuperThecrap So the USA are savages and cowards then?
CosmicGrounds 2 months ago
@CosmicGrounds who uses nukes to avoid loss instead of taking it like a man or not fighting at all?
SuperThecrap 2 months ago
@SuperThecrap Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the only two cities that comes to mind concerning nuking, and those were atomic bombs, not nukes. No one has used nukes on other nations. Other than Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United States has gone to war on foot with guns and tanks against other nations.
CosmicGrounds 2 months ago
@CosmicGrounds still atomic bombs suck only cowards and savages use it.the war is fought by soldiers but many civillians die unnecessary with atomic bombs
SuperThecrap 1 month ago
@SuperThecrap Who else has used atomic bombs on other countries since you're stating that cowards and savages use them, being plural? Regarding atomic bombs killing innocent civilians, do you not realize that many civilians die regardless of how a war is fought, even if it's swords and arrows?
CosmicGrounds 1 month ago
@CosmicGrounds you can spare or end someones life swiftly like that but it takes effort.it doesnt take effort to press a button and making innocents lives miserable
SuperThecrap 1 month ago
@SuperThecrap Well, I see you've ignored my first question. Concerning my second question answered, no one has pushed a button to drop and atomic bomb. America, dropped a bomb, more like rolled it out of an airplane onto Japan. But, despite that one war, America are still a coward to you, despite the many other wars Americans fought on foot against their enemies. Why do I have a feeling that you're just bigoted toward Americans?
CosmicGrounds 1 month ago
@CosmicGrounds oh the first one? I dont know about that exactly the only one I know is america.and does it matter if america sent that bomb from a plane or a button?the damage is still the same.also when other countries dont agree with them they are counted terrorists.the media keeps talking about how americans are heroes while they kill alot of civillians in iraq.americans would run away from a real fight if they didnt had those "drugs" during fights.
SuperThecrap 1 month ago
@SuperThecrap Well, if you don't know what nation other than America has dropped bombs onto enemy nations, then you shouldn't even be posting such comments. So because of one situation where a bomb is dropped, you disregard the other wars that heavily outnumber the atomic bomb battle? You've still avoided to answer the last question in my other post. I don't recall America ever refer to the British, French, or Germans as terrorists before in history.
CosmicGrounds 1 month ago
@CosmicGrounds close to terrorists.look at cuba,soviet russia and others for example.they are called maniacs.americunts are no heroes like they say.anyway I got different things to do.good bye
SuperThecrap 1 month ago
@SuperThecrap You're just a hater of America, while we have our problems, we're still better than the country you reside in. According to your logic every nation on Earth is responsible for calling others names other than, "enemy" as thus makes them cowards and other derogatory words that you mention.
CosmicGrounds 1 month ago 2
@CosmicGrounds wtf are u 2 arguing about. seriously stop being childish. America is cool but i heard it sucks to live their if ur not rich so can't be that good.....
AlexiusMoore 1 month ago
@AlexiusMoore Speaking of childish, why don't scroll down and see for yourself instead of making a spectacle of yourself. I'm middle class and I can say while I wish my life was better it's a great place to live, so what you have heard is only the opinion of someone else.
CosmicGrounds 1 month ago
@CosmicGrounds not really.but Im not going to start a long discussion about my countries nice people and brave army.sadly our government does suck right now.he is an american lover.and I dont know why you would justify nukes and such
SuperThecrap 1 month ago
@SuperThecrap I have never once in this argument justified nuclear bombs. I questioned you, because you called my nation cowards in war.
CosmicGrounds 1 month ago
Comment removed
SuperThecrap 1 month ago
@SuperThecrap Show me a civilization or tribe who has decided never to fight its enemies and I'll show you a conquered civilization or tribe.
CosmicGrounds 2 months ago
BUT now USA can DESTROY EUROPE..
gucci13 2 months ago
@gucci13 ever heard of the UN?
USA would never attack europe, if they would the whole world would be pitted against them
petertel123 2 months ago
@petertel123 i said USA "can"...alright? not USA "will"..please read my comment carefully...ewww
gucci13 2 months ago
@gucci13 That is what he was saying. The USA cannot destroy Europe. The simply can't. It is not possibly for the US. Let's say hypothetically that they did launch a nuke or something toward Europe, China and North Korea would find that as a gateway to unleash hell on America, thus the UN and North Korea or China would silence the USA. Hypothetically of course.
robbie4233334 2 months ago
@robbie4233334 i think launching 300 nukes at the sametime targeted at the most strategic places in mainland europe in a most unexpected day will do the job. you can say china and N.K all you want but you see our target is only to destroy europe which is the argument here. always possible and there is always a way..we can even hire terrorist groups or leftist group to our aid..all of that without europe knowing.
gucci13 2 months ago
@gucci13 No, he idiocy of that statement is astounding. 300 nukes in one place would not only destroy the countries, but the earth. The USA cannot destroy Europe. Why? Because there will be Americans high up in administration that will stop it, and the fact that the nukes would be intercepted. There is no way. The ISS would report the sighting, the UN would respond as soon as possible, and with either a missile defense system, or fighter planes would detonate the nuke in the air.
robbie4233334 2 months ago
Europe today needs more pride!
It's like most people are ashamed of our entire history :o
SinerAthin 2 months ago
nice music
Deelom100 2 months ago
I just noticed the Teutonic Knights have priest robes. That's how holy they are.
Retr0Master 2 months ago
@Retr0Master The Teutonic Knights wore tunics addorned with a black cross over their chainmail. They did not wear robes.
saithtam 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos 12
@saithtam I believe it is called a sircoat....
DukeOfTennessee117 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi, if you like instrumental music you might like our new guitar/violin/cello trio. Search 'the fugitive soar medieval' if you're interested. thanks from SOAR
SolidAir3 2 months ago
Russians owns them all!
maximusSVK 3 months ago
Teutonic Order = Medieval Nazis
silentsurvivor2011 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@silentsurvivor2011
you are wrong...
or you think all crusader is a nazi who killed those peoples who is not a christian?
Pmurder3 3 months ago
@silentsurvivor2011 Yup. I think they would have gotten along great.
alphatotheomega7 3 months ago
@alphatotheomega7 Funny thing is that the nazis banned the Teutonic Order...
MitchC92 2 months ago 2
@MitchC92 Oh yeah! You're right, they did because they were a Catholic organization! I had forgotten that. But I retain the opinion that they had similar hobbies of going out east to rape and massacre some Slavs.
alphatotheomega7 2 months ago
Comment removed
MitchC92 3 months ago
@silentsurvivor2011 lol shows how much you know about nazis and the teutonic order the teutonic order has NOTHING to do with the nazis' ideals of a superior human race the 'only' thing they did or tried to achieve was to establish a christian state on the balcan peninsula you are obviously one of those ignorant persons who associate everything that's german with nazis
TwilightLink293 2 months ago 24
@TwilightLink293 Actually, the Teutonic order became a racket. They didn't even try to convert great portions of their population into Christianity, because the Pagan presence attracted rich noblemen from all over the Europe, who paid the order to "fight Pagans". All the Teutonics did was to destabilize the region with this practice. They were unnecessary and harmful in that regard, as the Lithuanians would have probably converted faster without the order, the Christian pressure was too vast.
TheTokkin 1 month ago
@TheTokkin i didnt say they tried to convert the populace i said they tried to establish a christian state
TwilightLink293 1 month ago
@TwilightLink293 but same evil stuff that is.
Punderland 1 month ago
@Punderland compared to the stuff that used to go on during medieval ages their doings are considered as "average"
TwilightLink293 1 month ago
2012 : MONGOL INVASION : TOTAL WAR
LordKrinkow 3 months ago 2
This is the music you hear when I enter the room
HollywoodBattlefield 3 months ago
Well, I have seen a lot of suggestions for CA here so here it is my idea:
1- Of course, a Rome 2.
2- A campaign based in the Warring States period of China (about 300 B.C.), there's no strategy games inspired in the waring periods of China.
gunner38ED 4 months ago 3
@gunner38ED Asians history isn't as interesting or as symbolicol as european/middle eastern history
Varyalover 3 months ago 12
@Varyalover True that! ;) European history has always been in the center of human history! No other place has it happened so much in 2000 years as in Europe! xD Proud to be european :P hehe
Khristophoros1001 3 months ago 21
@Khristophoros1001 Don't get me wrong, I have taken to liking the history of a couple other continents, but the european history was always more dramatic, yet interesting and entertaining. More things happen, it relates to countries we'd like to know more about (for instance, if you came from Great Britain, you'd rather know about the kingdom of England than the warring periods of China or so)
A combination of what happened then and your own preferences helps this
Varyalover 3 months ago 2
@Khristophoros1001 True that.
TempestDust 2 months ago
@Khristophoros1001 china and middle east, match europe, until the 20 th century that is, but the 20th century sucked fo Europe
AlexiusMoore 1 month ago
@AlexiusMoore I don't agree! I don't think China and the middle-east has such an interesting history as Europe. Middle-eastern history was interesting at the time of the Crusades and again after 1948 when Israel was created. But in between those time periods the Middle-east have been really boring.
Khristophoros1001 1 month ago
@Khristophoros1001 thats ur opinion, but it seems u only see the middle east from europes prospective. Like crusades when europeans where involved and again 1948 when europe got involved again. but there were so many other things going on there at other periods in time, its not boring at all, especially when they had a 1000 year head start in conflicts as compared to europe
AlexiusMoore 1 month ago
@Varyalover @Lordsebastian101 Umh... looks like tou are european too XDDD. In fact my favourite strategy gam of all times is M2TW, in fact I still play sometimes to Kingdoms expansion or Stainless Steel 6.4, thats why I don't need a new Medieval yet, because I'm still playing M2TW.
Opposed to it, I love Roman history and Rome 1 is really outdated by now, almost hurts to see the graphics and animations and I dont know almost ANYTHING about China, son it might be interesting (or at least freash).
gunner38ED 3 months ago
@gunner38ED sorry about the typing mistakes, I wrote the comment in a hurry.
gunner38ED 3 months ago
@gunner38ED I'm actually a yank that has studied extensively into European history (And argued with the history teacher numourous times about the biased revolustionary war and war of 1812, which are extremely anti-british)
Varyalover 3 months ago
@Varyalover Yes they are, many people do not realize that not all American colonists won the Revolutionary War(It should not even be called that because it has no characteristics of a Revolution). The Royalists who did not want to break away from the king lost the war and there were as many Royalists as there were Patriots. And not to mention the way the Revolution was started!
HeirOfWallachia 3 months ago in playlist HeirOfWallachia's favorites
@HeirOfWallachia Yes, it was more of a civil war than anything else, IF that. So basiaclly the fathers of my country were greedy bastards- They were pissed at the proclomation which was to prevent wars- they wouldn't fight the wars themselves, and wouldn't pay the british govornment for protection.
It pisses me off, the history. I have NEVER read ANYTHING as biased!
Varyalover 3 months ago
@Varyalover I am glad that you know the real history behind that war.
HeirOfWallachia 3 months ago
@Varyalover The fathers of your country acted pretty much like everyone else in charge at that time. Great Britain was no saint, look at what they did to the Netherlands during that time period. The UK's lack of respect for any other nation's merchant fleet threatened to drag an alliance of Denmark, Sweden, and Russia into the war against them while they were already fighting Spain, France, the Colonies, and the Netherlands.
Everyone involved was quite greedy if you ask me.
AdmrScheer 3 months ago
@AdmrScheer No. The fools of my countr didn't act on 'freedom', but on power and greed. Great Britain, was run by and descended from, literelly, saints. You seem to misunderstand theway they treated other merchants, as business is business, and it wasn't Great Britain, but simply British merchants.
Varyalover 3 months ago
@Varyalover The Royal Navy and UK-sanctioned privateers (not merchants) would molest non-beligerant merchant vessels hurting both their enemies' economies and that of neutral nations.
If Great Britain was so 'saintly', why is it that they could not elicit a single European ally during the American Revolution but could find a continent of enemies?
I have nothing against the UK, but they acted on their own interests like every other nation.
AdmrScheer 3 months ago
@Varyalover You really think so?
TheBrolit 2 months ago
@gunner38ED medieval 3 bro
Lordsebastian101 3 months ago
@gunner38ED Indedd a total war game about the warring states period would be most interesting :D
Prussiaaccount 3 months ago
Does anyone know where to get this song for mp3 (legally, of course)? I wouldn't want to rob the makers of their fair share, and this song is just too good not to have.
Tamerlane101 4 months ago
@Tamerlane101 Collectors edttion of Medieval II (Base game + Kingdoms Expansion) haves the full Soundtrack sorry for my bad english
snakefh 4 months ago in playlist Medieval II
Religion and faith was diffrent in those days. People don't care much about fantasies nowadays, but in these times, the gods were watching you with every strike you lay, every child you slay, and every penny you gave. Name and honour was everything here, something we lack now as well. I have ancestors running in the German Order, but I don't care what they did wrong. Their lives are over and I am here to make the diffrence between their mistakes. Helfen, Wehren, Heilen= their motto.
jeffreygebbin 4 months ago
Für der Deutscher Orden !
Greetings from Belgium
ekatoubous100 4 months ago
Dreganos 4 months ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hail Satan! death to the Teutonic knights!
nacholinklol 4 months ago
@nacholinklol even satan is afraid of the Teutonic knights muahahaha
Jur4ss1cP4rk 4 months ago 50
IM CUMMING!
starXXkiller 4 months ago
@starXXkiller ME TOO BRO LET'S DO IT TOGETHER! IT'LL BE LIKE WE'RE IN THE TEMPLARS!!!
ocelot646 4 months ago
I have never taken a more epic shit in my life
Unit987654321 4 months ago
PURGEPURGEPURGE!
Rototornik 4 months ago in playlist ND999taufan's favorites
i agree that Medieval 2 is the best in the series, but, i wouldn't like to see Medieval 3, cuz i think they would ruin it...
HighOrdinator 4 months ago
Rome Total War is better than Medieval 2
NaCk210 5 months ago
@NaCk210 no.
Lordsebastian101 3 months ago
@Lordsebastian101
Yep.
NaCk210 3 months ago
Heresy!
*blam*
shan9usfc 5 months ago
i wonder why every total war series soundtracks are predominantly watched by men and all the comments seem a bit neerdy. maybe i should get a girlfriend to compensate my gaming...
Poromies41 5 months ago
@Poromies41 Sounds like a plan.
TheCrusader1109 5 months ago
@Poromies41 got a hooker and don't give a fuck about it......
gpalmamrw 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Poromies41 got a hooker and don't give a fuck about it......
gpalmamrw 4 months ago
i still play this game, and i must say.. it's freaking awesome!
tobias789987 5 months ago in playlist Medieval 2 total war
Niby jestem Polakiem, niby muzyka krzyżacka, a dałem Like ;-D
Thobold 5 months ago in playlist RPG War
1:30 \m/
MrDoubleFaced 5 months ago
England is the most powerful army in MTW2 Seriously cannot be beaten if played right, Heavy Archer supported by spear and foot, Forget your knights,
1MagicAndMayhem1 5 months ago