William Lane Craig vs. Paul Draper-- Existence of God Part 3

[Requiemxtoxinnocence]

I wonder if the disciples in mourning simply thought they saw jesus before them, scientific american did a study on this and many people have seen dead loved ones especially if they are under stress, drugs, and other influences. So it's possible that's what they saw.

[ultimategoobah]

:( now i want to know what that image was..

[MrSalamander7]

Man! Listening to Craig argue the probability of Jesus being the son of God is so funny. Couldn't get any weaker.

[philopathy]

Draper makes this argument that since theism makes dualism more likely, the fact that dualism is false is evidence against Theism. But what reasons exactly do we have to believe that dualism is false? I mean, he acts as if this were absolutely obvious, but its not to me. I very rarely hear anyone offer any arguments against it. But I've heard some good arguments for it?

[TimeEffect]

I accidentally removed your other comment on some transcript. I was trying to reply to it, but clicked remove by accident, sorry.

[owheydusoapsk]

Good debate between Craig and Robert Price too. You can find the mp3 on the net. Craig is very convincing if your already a Christian.

[TimeEffect]

I'll try uploading that if it's not on Youtube

[kuroshashu]

It's a book boofhead. The very least it can be is internally consistent. It fails mostly, but the bits in which it doesn't aren't evidence.

[philopathy]

kuroshashu-what are you responding to here?

[TimeEffect]

I think he's talking about using the bible for evidence, saying that you cannot use it as good source since it's internally inconsistent.

But I'll let him speak for himself

[kuroshashu]

I think I was responding to an assertion along the lines that the buy-bull is the word of yhwh because it's internal consistent: something that even if it were true wouldn't mean anything.

It was more an ejaculation than anything premeditated.