I don't know what's wrong with what Bush did. You think terrorists follow the Geneva Convention? Of course not. I like Bush because he didn't take shit from over countries, which is what a president should do.
Guess what? IT FREAKING WORKS! The reason we got Usama Bin Laden was because KSM and another were waterboarded and gave us info on the "runners" Usama used to carry messages. Then from there we found his location. so shut up
bush is a war mongering prick who commited war crimes he needs to be tortured everyone knows the yanks are behind 911 an excuse to start a war the yanks need to be brought down to earth
well its obvious that the interrogations are torture but what sucks is that in the case after 9/11 is that torture is a necessary evil. I dont see why Bush doesnt just come out and say he supports torture. But hey even Lincon suspended habeas corpus 'treading on civil rights'. who knows what america would look like without the information attained from awful acts on humanity such as waterboarding. Someone please offer me feedback on my thoughts, Id like to understand this topic for school.
yeah, "so that our professional have no doubt that what they doing is legal....like bombing of civilian hospitals, center of town in the midle of Sunday, Tv stations, Embessy buildings of our enemies..." And why dont you call civilian victims - civilians!?
If Bush doesn't think war crimes were committed by his administration, then why did he insist on adding immunities for war crimes to the Military Commissions Act of 2006?
Excerpts from Retired Vice Admiral Lee Gunn's testimony before Congress in early March 2009:
"An independent commission could undertake the task of examining the facts and, in so doing, weigh the true effectiveness of the Bush administration's torture tactics. Did torture actually uncover actionable intelligence? Did it interrupt plans? And did it actually save lives? If so, what were the countervailing costs to our national security?" (cont)
"Did the use of torture spark terrorist recruitment, increase danger to our troops, and damage U.S. leadership and prestige? And did these costs outweigh the benefits? Might actionable intelligence have also been obtained by the non-coercive methods experienced intelligence interrogators experts recommend and employ? What strategic security gains could be reaped from shifting to a policy of complete, consistent and transparent compliance with human rights norms?" (cont)
"The Bush Administration's misguided embrace of torture, secret prisons and renditions to torture came at an enormous cost to our American values, our laws, and our counterterrorism efforts. Repairing our reputation as a nation committed to human rights and building a more sustainable framework for national security policy going forward requires a comprehensive examination of the policies and practices that sanctioned torture and abuse." (cont)
"This Congress and the new Administration have a window of opportunity to conduct an examination that signals to the American people and to the world that the policies of the last seven years were an aberration and that the United States is invested in creating an effective, long-term strategy for counterterrorism and intelligence gathering which adheres to American principles and values and to United States and international law." (cont)
"The stakes are incredibly high. In the balance hangs the ability of the United States to maintain the integrity of our counterterrorism policy; improve intelligence cooperation with allies; support the human intelligence community in employing proven, effective methods for gathering actionable information; and re-establish the moral authority necessary to restore the United States as a world leader in upholding human rights."
Help educate young people about the misleading marketing, advertising and recruiting practices of the U.S. Army at the website which is the same as our user name.
Really? Then why was the Geneva Convention created?? This psycho needs to be convicted of war crimes. The terror attack on the United States citizens by the Bush regime is over. Yes , we got seriously played and they got seriously rich. Now what are we gonna do about it?
what the hell is he even talking about? Article 3 is not vague, it's wide, wide so as to cover as much prohibited treatment as possible, even the IRCR says this. You'd only say it was vague in order to give it a strained interpretation, so you can deny the whole purpose of the Article.
Wow if I were him i'd be so happy to god I i'm still alive thew the worst 8 year mistake humanly poosible by one individual. Sad thing is he we know he's stupid enough to seriouslly , SERIOUSLY beleave ssince he's no longer the president that the threat of assassination to his life is "Terminifieded" from happening
I'm sorry you feel that way. I happen to believe that its absolutely clear, article 3 of the G.C is written in so most people with some type of education can read and understand it.
Are you kidding me??? How about we put him, literally, in the shoes of those he's outraging on human dignity and see if his dignity is outraged. He makes me want to pull my hair out. How can he STILL be in office?!?!
the man is a liar and the only reason he orchastrated the 9-11 is because his popularity was zero not long after he was elected
wayne17700 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from cspam12345
I don't know what's wrong with what Bush did. You think terrorists follow the Geneva Convention? Of course not. I like Bush because he didn't take shit from over countries, which is what a president should do.
hindusanta123 2 months ago
I cringe at just listening to this guy. What a stupid draft dodging red neck.
quesondriac 3 months ago
If I were given the choice between waterboarding or let's say getting stretched on the rack, I would say "by all means, splash water on my face."
Let's face it, if it is torture, it's a pretty darn mild form of it.
URProductions 6 months ago
@extremeeXrement1 Shut the fuck fuck you don't know shit!
xXPuReXPaNcaKesXx 9 months ago
Guess what? IT FREAKING WORKS! The reason we got Usama Bin Laden was because KSM and another were waterboarded and gave us info on the "runners" Usama used to carry messages. Then from there we found his location. so shut up
sch3ffs 10 months ago
Vague, VAGUE? That isn't vague whatso ever. Jesus, Highschool students are smarter than his guy.
LavaLoveNoise 1 year ago
bush is a war mongering prick who commited war crimes he needs to be tortured everyone knows the yanks are behind 911 an excuse to start a war the yanks need to be brought down to earth
dihle12 1 year ago
@dihle12 I think you need to be brought back to planet earth.
URProductions 6 months ago
He reminds me of a kid coming up with an excuse for being late to class or something. A whiny little kid.
ssjsolidsnake 1 year ago
the geneeca convetion is a problem thats whty we lost vietnam
extremeeXrement1 1 year ago
well its obvious that the interrogations are torture but what sucks is that in the case after 9/11 is that torture is a necessary evil. I dont see why Bush doesnt just come out and say he supports torture. But hey even Lincon suspended habeas corpus 'treading on civil rights'. who knows what america would look like without the information attained from awful acts on humanity such as waterboarding. Someone please offer me feedback on my thoughts, Id like to understand this topic for school.
MitziLikeUhCrazy 1 year ago
Article 1-46 of the crappy Geneva Conventions dosen't protect those people..
trianglewhip 1 year ago
Bush is not so bad after all
trianglewhip 1 year ago
Every single thing he says is so....contentious.
mucanamnam 1 year ago
some presidents are to stupid to understand the Geneva Convention!!
log140 1 year ago
yeah, "so that our professional have no doubt that what they doing is legal....like bombing of civilian hospitals, center of town in the midle of Sunday, Tv stations, Embessy buildings of our enemies..." And why dont you call civilian victims - civilians!?
81Natasa 1 year ago
Bush makes me laugh.
Droogface 2 years ago 2
for Bush "there would be no outrageous about human dignity" is to vague... it sounded like waterboarding is ok!!! what a fucking war-criminal!!!
log140 2 years ago
If Bush doesn't think war crimes were committed by his administration, then why did he insist on adding immunities for war crimes to the Military Commissions Act of 2006?
im4wur2 2 years ago 8
@im4wur2 Easy, while he may not think he was committing war crimes, he knew the world would have.
MrTaikutsu 1 year ago
Excerpts from Retired Vice Admiral Lee Gunn's testimony before Congress in early March 2009:
"An independent commission could undertake the task of examining the facts and, in so doing, weigh the true effectiveness of the Bush administration's torture tactics. Did torture actually uncover actionable intelligence? Did it interrupt plans? And did it actually save lives? If so, what were the countervailing costs to our national security?" (cont)
im4wur2 2 years ago 2
"Did the use of torture spark terrorist recruitment, increase danger to our troops, and damage U.S. leadership and prestige? And did these costs outweigh the benefits? Might actionable intelligence have also been obtained by the non-coercive methods experienced intelligence interrogators experts recommend and employ? What strategic security gains could be reaped from shifting to a policy of complete, consistent and transparent compliance with human rights norms?" (cont)
im4wur2 2 years ago 2
"The Bush Administration's misguided embrace of torture, secret prisons and renditions to torture came at an enormous cost to our American values, our laws, and our counterterrorism efforts. Repairing our reputation as a nation committed to human rights and building a more sustainable framework for national security policy going forward requires a comprehensive examination of the policies and practices that sanctioned torture and abuse." (cont)
im4wur2 2 years ago 2
"This Congress and the new Administration have a window of opportunity to conduct an examination that signals to the American people and to the world that the policies of the last seven years were an aberration and that the United States is invested in creating an effective, long-term strategy for counterterrorism and intelligence gathering which adheres to American principles and values and to United States and international law." (cont)
im4wur2 2 years ago 2
"The stakes are incredibly high. In the balance hangs the ability of the United States to maintain the integrity of our counterterrorism policy; improve intelligence cooperation with allies; support the human intelligence community in employing proven, effective methods for gathering actionable information; and re-establish the moral authority necessary to restore the United States as a world leader in upholding human rights."
im4wur2 2 years ago 2
i bet they're vague becayse you haven't actually read it, you just sparknoted it, and had someone read it for you
scyllasource 2 years ago
What does that mean? Vague?I don't know you are supposed to be the Christian, asshole.
wolverine2244 2 years ago
lol how baked is he in this speach?
kokoro4 2 years ago
Notice how he did'nt read the entire geneva convention! He only cherry picked what he wanted, the Geneva convention is more than clear enough!
dsspike51 2 years ago
Help educate young people about the misleading marketing, advertising and recruiting practices of the U.S. Army at the website which is the same as our user name.
cammmodotorg 2 years ago
Really? Then why was the Geneva Convention created?? This psycho needs to be convicted of war crimes. The terror attack on the United States citizens by the Bush regime is over. Yes , we got seriously played and they got seriously rich. Now what are we gonna do about it?
j9feline 2 years ago 6
so he blames the Geneva convention article 3...
fuk u ,blame urself u terrorist, I hope someone Judges you the way u judge everyone Mr Bush, u break the law urself everyday...
mother fka
420League 3 years ago 2
bush is doing this so he is more protected
info2k8 3 years ago
i hate bush geneva convention should aplly to guantanamo
info2k8 3 years ago
what the hell is he even talking about? Article 3 is not vague, it's wide, wide so as to cover as much prohibited treatment as possible, even the IRCR says this. You'd only say it was vague in order to give it a strained interpretation, so you can deny the whole purpose of the Article.
lucypisthebest 3 years ago
Wow if I were him i'd be so happy to god I i'm still alive thew the worst 8 year mistake humanly poosible by one individual. Sad thing is he we know he's stupid enough to seriouslly , SERIOUSLY beleave ssince he's no longer the president that the threat of assassination to his life is "Terminifieded" from happening
Dec3ptive 3 years ago
no fan of "W" but I'm not a fan of terrorists slamming airplanes into building's either.
gitmo should be kept open as a real,supervised pow camp according to the Geneva convention and foot solders held for the duration as POW's
masterminds? piano wire hangings !
they started this war -- don't whine !
has America forgotten how angry we were on 9/11?
string the bastard's up in new york city !
Mussolini style !
yeah, it's ugly! The bastard's should have thought about that sucker punch on 9/11!
kwheezley 3 years ago
thank god this nazi is going to be out of office
swifteagle43 3 years ago 2
decent honorable citicens that torture maim and kill, we are an awesome country.
ThingNation 3 years ago
hahaha
swifteagle43 3 years ago
actully the geveva convention quite clear! caousing no harm on pows. dont be fooled by this dictator.
whitesnowoyuki 3 years ago
actually it's deliberately vague, it's so it makes it harder for idiots like Bush and co to violate it.
andystokie 3 years ago
I'm sorry you feel that way. I happen to believe that its absolutely clear, article 3 of the G.C is written in so most people with some type of education can read and understand it.
whitesnowoyuki 3 years ago
I'm not arguing with you, but it IS deliberately vague, it was designed that way, it's a catch all, so governments can't breach it.
andystokie 3 years ago
okay.
whitesnowoyuki 3 years ago
Are you kidding me??? How about we put him, literally, in the shoes of those he's outraging on human dignity and see if his dignity is outraged. He makes me want to pull my hair out. How can he STILL be in office?!?!
germanstarre 4 years ago
So pretty much he sayin that hes gonna rewrite the law to suit his needs. Countries came together to stop exactly what hes talking about.
jmacphee2 4 years ago
Clarity, what does this fuck know about CLARITY?
adyming 4 years ago 2