Added: 3 years ago
From: WoodwindMusicDK
Views: 13,007
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i like conn , sexy sax

  • bunch of old guys that just don't wanna change with times. it's 2011 and all sentimentalities aside, overall the P Mauriat sounds a lot better. in a certain range i prefered the conn and i even have both myself BUT overall, even if u ask a non-musician the people that buy albums, they would all say P mauriat.

  • Pmauriat Definitively

  • I think is hard to decide which one is better watching this .. "video" if you know what I mean...

    P.S. The player is not so good.

  • Definitely Conn!!!

  • Yes and maybe a bit more round as well--for a 'New' horn I think these have a lot of soul---

  • Excelent!. I have seen the UL and the vintage tests. I like better the UL sound. More profound sound IMO.

  • I like P Mauriat, more body on the sound , less thin

  • I agree-this was made when the Mauriat was basically brand new--now the sound has matured and is even better--see the test on the UL and Vintage Mauriats I put up

  • Hi:

    where can I see the other tests?

  • Conn for me. I wish you had a Yanagisawa, Yamaha, and Cannonball in there just for fun.

  • Comment removed

  • Another vote for the New Wonder here. The Mauriat did come very close though. btw, I liked the sampling of St. Thomas. Great playing.

  • I agree nothing can beat the sound of the old Conn saxes but I think the Mauriat comes as close as any modern sax can come.....

  • I like the Conn better.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more