schade das die einen zu kleinen motor in den koenigstiger gebaut haben sonst waere er viel schneller und somit noch gefaehrlicher aber es war halt keine zeit viele tests zu machen man hat sie an der front gebraucht
@blastermachine1 That tank vs a group of shermans would be like shooting fish in a barrel. Sherman crews were glad that the Tigers were slow, because they can and did RUN! from the german tanks. The real victory came because the germans had a hard time getting those big tanks to the battle on time. The shermans would come in early, clean house, and then run before Daddy got on the scene.
@blah666ful - That's not correct at all. The King Tiger was a mechanical piece of junk with transmission and steering gears breaking, along with very dangerous fuel leaks. They were so poorly designed that most of them never even saw combat. Even Hitler himself was disappointed with this thing. Sherman tanks had no need to run when American and British fighter bombers ruled the skies over Europe and blew thousands of German tanks to pieces.
@JohnQuincyAdams1 They did run, and call in an airstrike. Tank vs tank was not an option unless numbers were drastically in the sherman's favor. 4 shermans to one tiger or run and call in an airstrike.
@plasticbudgie - Sherman tanks won the war. They were designed as an infantry support tank and for their intended use they excelled. Inexpensive and easy to manufacture, thousands and thousands of them were manufactured.
@Echeque5 Unfortunatly they had a habit of bursting into flames and killing thier crews, hence the name "Tommy Cooker" given to it. And it wasn't the sheman that won the war. The war was one by superior planing and military stradegy. Hitler had a bad habit of having his best generals killed due to paranoia or if they spoke against him. In hindsight the "Twenty of out men to knock out a tiger" plan kinda sucked. In happenstance most shermans got taken out half a mile away by a tigers gun.
@DeathbyDusk - In the big picture, there weren't many Tiger tanks made and even fewer of the mechanical nightmare Tiger II that eve Hitler himself was disappointed with. The massive quantities of Sherman and T-34 tanks manufactured were indeed one of the major reasons Nazi Germany lost the war. When the Germans lost a tank on the battlefield, it took months to replace, whereas when a Sherman or T-34 was lost on the battlefield, there were replacements waiting in line.
@DeathbyDusk - Further, U.S. and British planes had virtual complete control of the skies over Europe, which meant German tanks were comparatively easy to destroy, which happened frequently. Nazi Germany never stood a snowball's chance in hell of winning that stupid, genocidal, evil war that killed over 50 million people in Europe.
@Echeque5 Actually most experts believe that it would have ended regaurdless of using the Shermans rushing stradegy in the war. While the equation 4 to 1 are brandied about alot, in most conflicts upwards of ten shermans were lost against german tigers and tiger 2's. The four to one ratio is factored form panther losses. In regaurds to that, most tank kills were from tank killer aircraft. I don't disagree the nazi party was evil either. Though, in the end, it was its allies that cost it the war.
@DeathbyDusk - I have studied history for over 40 years and WWII in particular. Nazi Germany never had the industrial capacity to sustain and win WWII. They were virtually always short of everything, particularly fuel, which brought their tanks, planes, etc., to a standstill. Initially their armies did well because they had prepared for war for many years and had a large military build up vs other European countries that didn't. But long term, there was no rational way they could win.
@Echeque5 Again, history has show they failed. History has also shown why. I'm am mearly pointing out that Shermans were an old and frightfully poor choice for tank crews in the second world war. Again, Italy was more a hindrence to Germany then a help, starting the african campeign and regularily starting conflicts it could not finish. Also why are we having an intilectual discussion on youtube?
@DeathbyDusk - The Sherman tank was not a poor choice. It was the *only choice* and anything is better than *nothing*. However, the Sherman was designed and intended as in infantry support tank and at that it excelled. It was never designed to take on heavy tanks and neither is any light or medium tank.
@DeathbyDusk thy call it zerging dude thats why thy won the war thy waited for the eastfront to wear out his army and invaded beaches of normandy and other landings .......zerg just poor em al in.and wait for those brownings to overheat or run out of ammo....and for those plains where there not german jetfighters in the making when the tommys landed
@Echeque5 Do your research. All were pretty much destroyed in combat, as opposed to breaking down. Thier engines were underpowered, but did not break down as much as everyone seems to think. Its main flaw was it its expense. 12 Tiger 2's backed up by 24 Tigers didn't really do much against 400 shermans. Not really a joke there, thats basically the summery of the largest concentration of tiger 2's in the war.
@DeathbyDusk - I am a historian of over 40 + years with thousands of history books in my personal library. Research? Come on over to my place sometime and you do all the research you want. The Tiger II was a mechanical piece of junk and most of them never saw combat because they broke down so frequently. They were underpowered and and overweight, putting massive stress on their driveline components with subsequent breakdowns.
this is one of three tanks from WWII that is best ever at least for me, together with tiger I and panther , King tiger if survived would be even today a menance ocourse with some heavy upgrades,
It had a number of names depending on who you talk to. Tiger B; Tiger II; King Tiger; Royal Tiger. I am sure if you were sat in a Sherman with one trundling towards you you would have called it many things :-)
ну что подлецы, восхищаетесь достижениями нациков?, ну, ну... наш ракетоносец Ту-160 ждёт когда вы его разбудите. С ненавистью из РОССИИ!, и кстати, блексопс - ты придурок, Королевский тигр и есть Тигр II
@0willsy01 In 1974, the German Red Cross reported that about 41,000 German MIAs were last reported in western Germany, which is also the location of the prisoner camps.[98] It is reasonable to assume that some deaths in transit camps just before the end of the war went unreported in the chaos at the time Historian Albert Cowdrey estimates that the total figure is unlikely to be above the aggregate of the recorded deaths and the MIAs, which together total 56,285.
@0willsy01 No mate, there are so called " alien autopies", truthers, and all kinds of literature and dicumentaries to fool the honest but naive. Former OberLt Orndorrff who lives2 hosuese form me and is an active 89 years old is an eyewitness who actually fougt at the Kursk salient and Western Front. He later described is command of volkstrum and HitlerYouth. He and many others whose homes were in the eastern part of Germany were decalred as statless and never repatriated.
@akkudakkupl The phrase Bengal Tiger translates into German as KonigsTiger, also known as King Tiger by the Americans, Royal Tiger to the brits or PanzerKampfwagen VI to others.
@fallschirmjager0000 I know what it means. What I state is that it is known not under its real name, because of crude translation (and lack of linguistic skill of the soldiers).
@0willsy01 You need to research more fully. His addmission was that he miscalculated the amount of food needed. You are reading into a massive lie propagated by white supremacist conspricacy theorist. You are becoming no better than the religous zealots you say you despise. You should know that most of youtube and wiki is a crock. My neighbour is an expatriate who was there he one of the "missing" people declared stateless
@0willsy0 Stephen E. Ambrose later wrote in the New York Times:
Mr. Bacque is wrong on every major charge. German prisoners did not die by the hundreds of thousands,There was nothing sinister or secret about the "disarmed enemy forces" designation or about the column "other losses." Mr. Bacque's "missing million" were old men and young boys in the Volkssturm (People's Militia) released without formal discharge and transfers
@0willsy01 He did not. Id you read the letter to Mamie Eisenhower in its entirity he amkes it clear he is referening to the nazis not ethnic Germans ( which he himself was) All the conspiracy theoeies and websites you follow religously ( hypocrtical for an atheist to have such blind faitth isn't it?) are base of white supremicist and nazi apologist James Bacque. Bacque falied to tabulate the released, repartiated POWs and simply called them "missing".
@0willsy01 The Esenhower Death Camps area myth propagated by Neo nazis, which is why I dump yu in that catergory for adhereingto it. The scientist in " paper clip" like Vo Braunwere not throroughly party indoctrinated in nazism. Von Braun himself ahd been arrested at least on two ocassions. Is work in the US Space Programme only vindicated and furthered the work of Goddard.
@0willsy01 First grow up and accept these points:1) the nazi lost the war,2) much of their later equpmet was cobbled together and rushed into service ( like the KT) because they faced imminent defeat 3) The Western Allies did not slaughter nazi POWs 4) The "world" did not gang up on the nazis 5) No one "stole" all of nazi tech.
You accuse and debase people of regligous faith and you worhsip and revel in the myth of nazi tech.
@0willsy01 Like I give a fuck what you and your fag friends think. You are the laugh., you nazi teabagger. I See how easy it is to goad a not nits spinless bastard like you. Go ahead and cry dickless your fag mates will wipe your arse after you blow them off. Dfend your weak postion like a man and admit how stupid, ans misguided it is
@0willsy01 And you're wanking again,lmao. Tell us o wise willywanker show us what wasso "dekades" advanced about this shit pile? the underpowered engine that burned up pushing its bulk?yjr avanced transmisson that got ground up?the intreleaved tracks that caked with mud? the manhous and material that went into. Waiting for your pro nazi reply.
@daddymhm O willy the willy wanker. We=hen will you stop you reach arounds? Simpicity of design, cost, and operation,-- not complexity, is good. When will you nazi apologsit ever learn?
@MatrixtheHedgehog Auf Google wird ja angeblich nicht Zensiert ! HA, HA.
Wenn das Deutsche Militär im 2. Weltkrieg nur 50 % von den Nachschubgütern gehabt hätte die die Alliierten hatten, so wären auch Heute noch Alliierte Soldaten im Kampf um den letzten Zipfel von Alaska auf verlorenem Posten.
@USExceptionalism What i meant about "'german steel'' has nothing to do whether or not it was made in Germany or sweeden. it was meant something else, go search on google.
dude that's a panther not a king tiger... king tiger didn't saw action... it was only a concept... by the time they could build a king tiger the war was over...
@l4hv1n3k The lowest cannon on the P-1000 is 20 feet up and not able to aim low enough to hit anything within 100 feet away, so a Tiger II 5 feet away, is invincible, unless the P-1000 driver is amazing and drives over the king tiger like a monster truck.
@IrishHitman79 whilst i agree with you on that, most king tigers were only put out of action due to mechanical failure/lack of spare parts and fuel shortages. even then the biggest problem the germans faced was massive numerical inferiority, if you look at some of the stats, tank kill ratio was usually around 3:1 in favour of the germans, but the russians were producing about 8 times the number of tanks that germany was, after the failure of Barbarossa, germany was going to lose no matter what
@Nathan5027 I agree to i was just saying in, Look at what Kurt Kinspel did in his Tiger1/2 tanks. If Germany had spent more time im making assault guns and Panzer 4s they would probably held out longer. I have one question did the Germans ever start to use Diesel engines in there tanks like the Russians?
@IrishHitman79 In retrospect, Germany could have increased their success chances by alot of smaller or larger adjustments, however, in the end it came down to simple numbers. Even IF Germany had beaten Britain in 40/41, in the end, the concerted efforts by russia and the US would have ultimately overpowered the German production. 10000 Shermans and 10000 T34 ... it was too much.
@randomUnhold in hind sight, the war, at the beginning at least, was a very close run thing, first Britain and France fluffed, by nit invading Germany, then germany fluffs the battle of britain by switching to civilian targets and not keeping the pressure on airfields, followed by an immidiate invasion. then the fluff barbarossa by failing to consider cold weather preparation, or getting the japanese to attack the east of russia and tying up any reserve forces.
@IrishHitman79 not sure, i know they planned to use diesel to power the generator in the maus, other than that i don't know. it's probable that if the war went on longer, they would have developed one, but as is, don't think so.
all that said, the early german tank designs were painfully flawed; thin, flat armour, light weaponry etc. that they found a 'gem' in the stug is incredible, but surely they could have used that as a basis to design a decent purpose built TD before the hetzer in 1944
In order to bypas and cut off the city as you suggested, the germans would of had to cross the Don to the N , and push NE, in the SE advance to and along the whole Volga to the Caspian Sea, cross the Volga on a broad front from at least Stalingrad to the Caspian Sea and establish secure bridgeheads along the whole river etc etc . An impossible task that wasnt even disscused.
Its better if you looked at a map , or an operational map to better understand the situation.
No mate , Stalingrad couldnt be completelly encircled and cut off. Stalingrad is on the Volga, "with the back" to the Volga so to speak . Case Blue started and the germans advanced twards the SE along the Don river , which "guarded" the left flank of the advance. Near Stalingrad the Don turns S , and makes a bend , which the germans crossed , but they didnt cross the Don to the N , where the Vatutin and Danilov`s forces were stationed.
But fact of the matter is , many of the german generals in the general staff were simply spinless carrierists , and many of them were involved in the decision makeing processes of the war . Generals like Alfred Jodl , Wilhelm Keitel , Walter von Brauchitsch or Goering etc etc , were not military geniuses .
Fact is all higher echelons of the armed forces were plagued with bureaucracy , and they dictated the course of the war , and large scale decisions , with Hitler`s overview ofc.
Mate , Stalingrad couldnt be surrounded and cut off...as about 10% of the city was located on the far side of the Volga . Actually Stalingrad was bombed into rubble , and that actually helped the defending russians. The 6th army controled more than 90% of the city , but reinforcments and suplies were still comeing in over the Volga.
I know that when people think about german generals they imediatelly think about Guderian , Rommel , Manstein etc etc ... military geniuses.
And also its becomeing more more apearent that actually Hitler wasnt to blame for many of the dissasters that have been imputed to him . in the early years of the at least he actually gave quite a lot of control , specially to the OKH , in the planing of the operations . As the war dragged on , he increassinglly became involved in the decision makeing procces , true . But i think the fault is shared by both Hitler and the general staff in equall meassure.
No mate , actually there was no way the germans could take the Baku Oil Fields without takeing Stalingrad. Stalingrad had to be taken , couse it commanded the major suply routes on the Volga to the soviet forces defending in the S. And also advanceing to the oil fields without takeing Stalingrad would be insane , as the left flank of the advance would be dangerouslly exposed .
Problem is the germans split their forces and tryed to take them both at once , which is a big mistake .
@Cosmin1511 Hitler should have focused on Moscow, once you take Moscow you destroy Russian morale plus Stalin would have to flee his own capital. After Moscow was taken then Hitler should have focused on Stalingrad/Baku oil fields. -Hitler wanted to take Stalingrad because of its name STALINgrad...
On the 14th of September 1812 Napoleon captured Moskow and burnt it to the ground, but failed to distroy the Russian army . Its widelly known what happened in the end.
In order to secure the Baku Oilfields , Stalingrad had to be taken ... and not just couse of its name ...but couse it was a very important strategic point. It commanded most of the comunication lines to the armies in the S defending the OilFields , to name just one of point of its importance .
@JohnQuincyAdams1 I know, it had it's problems, but I still wouldn't want to face off with one.... Also, I think the war would have lasted longer if they massed produced Panzer IV's instead of trying to go bigger & if Hitler would have let his commanders make the calls and not him.
@TheAnimal590-Field Marshall Erwin Rommel could have been in complete charge of Nazi Germany's military forces and they still would have resoundingly lost. Rommel knew this, which is why he wanted to sue for peace and end the war, before all of Germany was destroyed, (as it sadly was). For tanks to be an effective weapon, control of the air must be maintained and after the Battle of Britain with the Luftwaffe being virtually destroyed, Nazi Germany lost air control for the rest of the war.
My arguement was that the Germans could have knocked the Soviets out in 1941 and effectively won, nation vs nation with what they had.
Had the Nazis not been evil and taken advantage of various liberated people, two examples being Jews & Ukrainians, they would have had a larger manpower base.
Puppet regimes can solve these problems to a large extent, the French people on a large part collaborated with the Nazis, establishment likes to hide this fact.
@otester - Nazi Germany never had the industrial capacity to sustain and win WWII. With the Soviet Union specifically, Nazi Germany's supply lines were stretched to the breaking point because of the very long distances on the Russian Front.
@JohnQuincyAdams1true they could not win a long war, but they could have won the war. they made mistakes and had a LOT of 'bad luck'. Everyone(including the allies) thought Russia would be conquered in about 2 months. the Russian army was weak. but they made several big mistakes, like spreading the forces to thin, wait to long so Russian reinforcements could arrive etc.
If they were like "We liberated you wfrom evil Soviets, now come help us to defeat them completely, we ask only for cooperation", then yes, that would work. Istead they acted like idiots.
@TheAnimal590 - It' s a good thing that a tanks beauty has nothing to do with its combat effectiveness. This thing was a mechanical nightmare and broke down frequently.
@vladimirmilojevic1 - It was a tank? Are you sure? It did keep many mechanics busy trying to fix the stupid thing with all the breakdowns it suffered.
The hell are you talking about? Gosh what an extremist, i hate that kind of people. My quotes was taken by the game "World of Tanks". Damn.. search first, then criticize.
im pretty sure they have the korean and vietnam wars listed in american books and they are referred to as wars or conflicts. How bout you actually pick up a book smtime ingus
germany should have built more assaults guns like StuGs and hetzers. they were very reliable vehicles that always worked without breaking down, cheap to build, easy to maintain and very effective. they could also easily be hidden because they were relatively small.
@RexMineCraft - Nazi Germany didn't have the industrial capacity to build more of *anything*. They were stretched to the limit and even *that* wasn't enough to sustain and win WWII, thank God.
@RexMineCraft - It wold have only delayed the inevitable anyway, as Nazi Germany never had the industrial capacity to sustain and win WWII, thank God.
German Steel
TheRatniProfiter 1 month ago 4
drive this tank to go to school.
run over principal's car
Tofu64Vagine 1 month ago 4
cooooooool
08071987 1 month ago
Der Königstiger der König unter der Panzern dieser der Zeit.
AxisPack 2 months ago
does it have an original engine?
dastotalebroetchen 2 months ago
schade das die einen zu kleinen motor in den koenigstiger gebaut haben sonst waere er viel schneller und somit noch gefaehrlicher aber es war halt keine zeit viele tests zu machen man hat sie an der front gebraucht
Starcruiser15 2 months ago
Hey, give me my ride back!
IRewweIR 2 months ago
Germans seemed to be overcompensating with this one.
GenericAmerican1 2 months ago
@GenericAmerican1 pussy
holdradio 2 months ago
German Steel!
Juihi2 3 months ago
@Juihi2 - German steel LOST the war. Look it up.
JohnQuincyAdams1 2 months ago
@JohnQuincyAdams1 Orly?
Juihi2 2 months ago
Hehe nette kleine Maschine der Maybach 700 PS :)
kameraman99 3 months ago
ACHTUNG TIGER!!!
skyZZofreniKdesignS 3 months ago
fantastico!
sawajama 3 months ago
i wonder how enemies have been shitting bricks when that kind of thing is coming towards O_O
terohiirou 3 months ago
Pedazo de bicho para la epoca...me encanta
Belzuan1988 3 months ago
shermans would Gangbang that pile of german steel!
blastermachine1 3 months ago
@blastermachine1 and still lose haha
angrycaveman 3 months ago
@blastermachine1 That tank vs a group of shermans would be like shooting fish in a barrel. Sherman crews were glad that the Tigers were slow, because they can and did RUN! from the german tanks. The real victory came because the germans had a hard time getting those big tanks to the battle on time. The shermans would come in early, clean house, and then run before Daddy got on the scene.
blah666ful 3 months ago 3
@blah666ful
Lmfao. Some people really have no clue.
Panteraforever67 2 months ago
@blah666ful aaaaaand because 80% of german army was in the easter front.
bltnxkrw 2 months ago
@blah666ful - That's not correct at all. The King Tiger was a mechanical piece of junk with transmission and steering gears breaking, along with very dangerous fuel leaks. They were so poorly designed that most of them never even saw combat. Even Hitler himself was disappointed with this thing. Sherman tanks had no need to run when American and British fighter bombers ruled the skies over Europe and blew thousands of German tanks to pieces.
JohnQuincyAdams1 2 months ago
@JohnQuincyAdams1 They did run, and call in an airstrike. Tank vs tank was not an option unless numbers were drastically in the sherman's favor. 4 shermans to one tiger or run and call in an airstrike.
blah666ful 2 months ago
@blastermachine1 Sherman tanks sucked bro
plasticbudgie 3 months ago 19
@plasticbudgie - Sherman tanks won the war. They were designed as an infantry support tank and for their intended use they excelled. Inexpensive and easy to manufacture, thousands and thousands of them were manufactured.
Echeque5 2 months ago
@Echeque5 Unfortunatly they had a habit of bursting into flames and killing thier crews, hence the name "Tommy Cooker" given to it. And it wasn't the sheman that won the war. The war was one by superior planing and military stradegy. Hitler had a bad habit of having his best generals killed due to paranoia or if they spoke against him. In hindsight the "Twenty of out men to knock out a tiger" plan kinda sucked. In happenstance most shermans got taken out half a mile away by a tigers gun.
DeathbyDusk 2 months ago
@DeathbyDusk - In the big picture, there weren't many Tiger tanks made and even fewer of the mechanical nightmare Tiger II that eve Hitler himself was disappointed with. The massive quantities of Sherman and T-34 tanks manufactured were indeed one of the major reasons Nazi Germany lost the war. When the Germans lost a tank on the battlefield, it took months to replace, whereas when a Sherman or T-34 was lost on the battlefield, there were replacements waiting in line.
Echeque5 2 months ago
@DeathbyDusk - Further, U.S. and British planes had virtual complete control of the skies over Europe, which meant German tanks were comparatively easy to destroy, which happened frequently. Nazi Germany never stood a snowball's chance in hell of winning that stupid, genocidal, evil war that killed over 50 million people in Europe.
Echeque5 2 months ago
@Echeque5 Actually most experts believe that it would have ended regaurdless of using the Shermans rushing stradegy in the war. While the equation 4 to 1 are brandied about alot, in most conflicts upwards of ten shermans were lost against german tigers and tiger 2's. The four to one ratio is factored form panther losses. In regaurds to that, most tank kills were from tank killer aircraft. I don't disagree the nazi party was evil either. Though, in the end, it was its allies that cost it the war.
DeathbyDusk 2 months ago
@DeathbyDusk - I have studied history for over 40 years and WWII in particular. Nazi Germany never had the industrial capacity to sustain and win WWII. They were virtually always short of everything, particularly fuel, which brought their tanks, planes, etc., to a standstill. Initially their armies did well because they had prepared for war for many years and had a large military build up vs other European countries that didn't. But long term, there was no rational way they could win.
Echeque5 2 months ago
@Echeque5 Again, history has show they failed. History has also shown why. I'm am mearly pointing out that Shermans were an old and frightfully poor choice for tank crews in the second world war. Again, Italy was more a hindrence to Germany then a help, starting the african campeign and regularily starting conflicts it could not finish. Also why are we having an intilectual discussion on youtube?
DeathbyDusk 2 months ago
@DeathbyDusk - The Sherman tank was not a poor choice. It was the *only choice* and anything is better than *nothing*. However, the Sherman was designed and intended as in infantry support tank and at that it excelled. It was never designed to take on heavy tanks and neither is any light or medium tank.
Echeque5 1 month ago
@DeathbyDusk thy call it zerging dude thats why thy won the war thy waited for the eastfront to wear out his army and invaded beaches of normandy and other landings .......zerg just poor em al in.and wait for those brownings to overheat or run out of ammo....and for those plains where there not german jetfighters in the making when the tommys landed
debbaOfTheFlanders 2 months ago
@blastermachine1 are you mad the tiger would fuck the sherman they are like toys for the german tanks 1 tiger can fight 5 shermans at once
Starcruiser15 2 months ago
@Starcruiser15 - Only when the King Tiger wasn't *broken down*, or had *run out of fuel*.
JohnQuincyAdams1 2 months ago
gitler KAPUT
MyDemon73 3 months ago
wow:O
CanoniX5000 3 months ago
Too bad it had a medium tank sized engine, or it could really go!
panzerfaulst12345 4 months ago
love the engine sound
0z3r0 4 months ago 27
@0z3r0 - During WWII, that engine sound wasn't heard very often, as most King Tiger tanks broke down. Junk.
Echeque5 2 months ago
@Echeque5 Do your research. All were pretty much destroyed in combat, as opposed to breaking down. Thier engines were underpowered, but did not break down as much as everyone seems to think. Its main flaw was it its expense. 12 Tiger 2's backed up by 24 Tigers didn't really do much against 400 shermans. Not really a joke there, thats basically the summery of the largest concentration of tiger 2's in the war.
DeathbyDusk 2 months ago
@DeathbyDusk - I am a historian of over 40 + years with thousands of history books in my personal library. Research? Come on over to my place sometime and you do all the research you want. The Tiger II was a mechanical piece of junk and most of them never saw combat because they broke down so frequently. They were underpowered and and overweight, putting massive stress on their driveline components with subsequent breakdowns.
Echeque5 2 months ago
this is one of three tanks from WWII that is best ever at least for me, together with tiger I and panther , King tiger if survived would be even today a menance ocourse with some heavy upgrades,
Zagoreni02A 4 months ago
It had a number of names depending on who you talk to. Tiger B; Tiger II; King Tiger; Royal Tiger. I am sure if you were sat in a Sherman with one trundling towards you you would have called it many things :-)
FrancoHitlini 4 months ago
RUN AWAY!
roffe970 4 months ago
fdsgw
CHALLENGER4599 4 months ago
ну что подлецы, восхищаетесь достижениями нациков?, ну, ну... наш ракетоносец Ту-160 ждёт когда вы его разбудите. С ненавистью из РОССИИ!, и кстати, блексопс - ты придурок, Королевский тигр и есть Тигр II
elViperuga 4 months ago
Its a development of the tiger. It has thick sloped armour with more coverage and greater capacity. None of these tanks wer destroyed during ww2
barry8472 4 months ago
Its a develop ent
barry8472 4 months ago
it is a king tiger not a tiger 2
blackops1348 4 months ago
@blackops1348 same thing...
GeneralAdvance 4 months ago
@blackops1348 kingtiger = tiger 2 !!!
its called panzerkampfwagen VI Tiger II
HeiniVoelker18 4 months ago
@HeiniVoelker18 I know i like calling it a king tiger then a tiger II
blackops1348 4 months ago
@HeiniVoelker18 actually its Panzerkampfwagen Tiger Ausf. B
mitchellf96 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Das ist ein KÖNIGSTIGER und kein Kingtiger du lutscher!
SuperRanger119 4 months ago
nice tiger ii
zhuowu 4 months ago
@0willsy01 In 1974, the German Red Cross reported that about 41,000 German MIAs were last reported in western Germany, which is also the location of the prisoner camps.[98] It is reasonable to assume that some deaths in transit camps just before the end of the war went unreported in the chaos at the time Historian Albert Cowdrey estimates that the total figure is unlikely to be above the aggregate of the recorded deaths and the MIAs, which together total 56,285.
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
@0willsy01 No mate, there are so called " alien autopies", truthers, and all kinds of literature and dicumentaries to fool the honest but naive. Former OberLt Orndorrff who lives2 hosuese form me and is an active 89 years old is an eyewitness who actually fougt at the Kursk salient and Western Front. He later described is command of volkstrum and HitlerYouth. He and many others whose homes were in the eastern part of Germany were decalred as statless and never repatriated.
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
It's NOT KING Tiger - it's Bengal Tiger...
akkudakkupl 4 months ago
@akkudakkupl The phrase Bengal Tiger translates into German as KonigsTiger, also known as King Tiger by the Americans, Royal Tiger to the brits or PanzerKampfwagen VI to others.
fallschirmjager0000 3 months ago
@fallschirmjager0000 I know what it means. What I state is that it is known not under its real name, because of crude translation (and lack of linguistic skill of the soldiers).
akkudakkupl 3 months ago
@0willsy01 You need to research more fully. His addmission was that he miscalculated the amount of food needed. You are reading into a massive lie propagated by white supremacist conspricacy theorist. You are becoming no better than the religous zealots you say you despise. You should know that most of youtube and wiki is a crock. My neighbour is an expatriate who was there he one of the "missing" people declared stateless
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
@0willsy0 Stephen E. Ambrose later wrote in the New York Times:
Mr. Bacque is wrong on every major charge. German prisoners did not die by the hundreds of thousands,There was nothing sinister or secret about the "disarmed enemy forces" designation or about the column "other losses." Mr. Bacque's "missing million" were old men and young boys in the Volkssturm (People's Militia) released without formal discharge and transfers
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
@0willsy01 He did not. Id you read the letter to Mamie Eisenhower in its entirity he amkes it clear he is referening to the nazis not ethnic Germans ( which he himself was) All the conspiracy theoeies and websites you follow religously ( hypocrtical for an atheist to have such blind faitth isn't it?) are base of white supremicist and nazi apologist James Bacque. Bacque falied to tabulate the released, repartiated POWs and simply called them "missing".
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
O willyI suggest you read Von Braun's autobiograly as well as Niel Furguson Work, along with Abrose
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
@0willsy01 The Esenhower Death Camps area myth propagated by Neo nazis, which is why I dump yu in that catergory for adhereingto it. The scientist in " paper clip" like Vo Braunwere not throroughly party indoctrinated in nazism. Von Braun himself ahd been arrested at least on two ocassions. Is work in the US Space Programme only vindicated and furthered the work of Goddard.
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
@0willsy01 First grow up and accept these points:1) the nazi lost the war,2) much of their later equpmet was cobbled together and rushed into service ( like the KT) because they faced imminent defeat 3) The Western Allies did not slaughter nazi POWs 4) The "world" did not gang up on the nazis 5) No one "stole" all of nazi tech.
You accuse and debase people of regligous faith and you worhsip and revel in the myth of nazi tech.
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
@0willsy01 Grown men don't drop hints State your postion with facts, documentation, and reasoning
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
@0willsy01 Like I give a fuck what you and your fag friends think. You are the laugh., you nazi teabagger. I See how easy it is to goad a not nits spinless bastard like you. Go ahead and cry dickless your fag mates will wipe your arse after you blow them off. Dfend your weak postion like a man and admit how stupid, ans misguided it is
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
@0willsy01 Yes you must rest because you are a eunuch, and you're laughing at yourself
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
@0willsy01 Your're a dickless cur? Like that spelling? It means you area mongrel dog with no sex organ. That make sense to you?
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
@0willsy01 And you're wanking again,lmao. Tell us o wise willywanker show us what wasso "dekades" advanced about this shit pile? the underpowered engine that burned up pushing its bulk?yjr avanced transmisson that got ground up?the intreleaved tracks that caked with mud? the manhous and material that went into. Waiting for your pro nazi reply.
USExceptionalism 4 months ago
@MrFKMusic But it never destroyed one
USExceptionalism 5 months ago
@0willsy01 But take a closer look at this thing
It was so like the most german Weapons a few dekades before its Time - all these things where th complexe th build, toexpensive , but fucking good
daddymhm 5 months ago
@daddymhm O willy the willy wanker. We=hen will you stop you reach arounds? Simpicity of design, cost, and operation,-- not complexity, is good. When will you nazi apologsit ever learn?
USExceptionalism 5 months ago
@MatrixtheHedgehog Auf Google wird ja angeblich nicht Zensiert ! HA, HA.
Wenn das Deutsche Militär im 2. Weltkrieg nur 50 % von den Nachschubgütern gehabt hätte die die Alliierten hatten, so wären auch Heute noch Alliierte Soldaten im Kampf um den letzten Zipfel von Alaska auf verlorenem Posten.
daddymhm 5 months ago
@daddymhm Well actually Google should censor that stupid lie. The stupiod nazi couldn't spellsupply, let alone AK.
USExceptionalism 5 months ago
now that´s what the german army needed to win WW2 ;D (joke)
Punkrock1life 5 months ago
It's good to be the King.
Chupacabra777 5 months ago
Russian Happymeal.....
Alpenbasti1 5 months ago
ohh wait.....did you stole my car?
gtazocker312 5 months ago
OMG i never imagined this thing to be that huge O_o
Beakle 5 months ago
@MrFKMusic never destoyed a Pershing. In theonly encounter it GOT destoyed bya Pershing
USExceptionalism 5 months ago
@USExceptionalism A pershing is a toy against an Tiger2 .When we only had the Supply and the numbers of Produktion that the u.s. has
Today Youre White House will be an german Tank garage
daddymhm 5 months ago
Mind your toes!
reverendcutterx 5 months ago
I LOVE THE TIGER TANKS
mrsgaap1 5 months ago
wwwwwaaaaaaaa run away that thing is just soooooo scary :o
sbringdude 5 months ago
German steel!
Timx4 5 months ago 23
@Timx4 And it Rolls ,and it makes the allied Infantry pissing in theyreFategues
daddymhm 5 months ago
@Timx4 No actually at that point it was Swedish
USExceptionalism 5 months ago
@USExceptionalism What i meant about "'german steel'' has nothing to do whether or not it was made in Germany or sweeden. it was meant something else, go search on google.
Timx4 4 months ago
@Timx4 Prost !
pimpedvw 3 months ago
KING TIGER with the Porsche turret is the most beautiful, and rare! They have one at the Bovington tank museum.
haiherosner 5 months ago
Super
demarkatie 5 months ago
so einen will ich auch
Ambossssar 5 months ago
the most powerful tank in world war 2
jaygwap 5 months ago
does this still have the Porche Turret or did they already change that in this model
Timmyboy505 5 months ago
Dont feed the troll (nissan80) ffs! Clearly he is just trying to provoke an argument, or he's just severely retarded...
IvanBeSerious 6 months ago
this is a tank.. this is german steel haha
ONeill45 6 months ago
dude that's a panther not a king tiger... king tiger didn't saw action... it was only a concept... by the time they could build a king tiger the war was over...
nissan80 6 months ago
@nissan80
No you're wrong that IS a King Tiger and they saw combat in the Second World War from mid-1944 onwards.
mcpwns 6 months ago
@nissan80 nope
MrAapenkind 6 months ago
I thought it wa real, then I saw the French flag at the end.
buildingeverything 6 months ago
they made this 70years ago.・・・・・incredible!
This is a rival of the Japanese tank type 89.huhuhu・・・
no1kiyoko 6 months ago
That is just beautiful machine. Love it.
Pantherace 6 months ago
p1000 is better
p1500 is too beter
l4hv1n3k 6 months ago
@l4hv1n3k the king tiger was the best tank in the war
godzillafights 6 months ago
@l4hv1n3k Lol a tiger 2 sits 5 feet from the P1000, P1000 cant shoot Tiger II at all, Tiger 2 shots it like a million times, TIGER 2 WINZ YO
Shuttheheckup735 6 months ago
@Shuttheheckup735 no he kill him with his cannon
l4hv1n3k 6 months ago
@l4hv1n3k The lowest cannon on the P-1000 is 20 feet up and not able to aim low enough to hit anything within 100 feet away, so a Tiger II 5 feet away, is invincible, unless the P-1000 driver is amazing and drives over the king tiger like a monster truck.
Shuttheheckup735 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Still an impressive machine.
HandigeHarry010 6 months ago
is chuck norris bike
therockchannel100 6 months ago
@therockchannel100 Chuck norris shoes
fox100cool 6 months ago
imagine being a Russian soldier and this beast comes at you. no thanks
frogjezz 6 months ago
@frogjezz And yet the Russians had them on the run with t-34/85s
IrishHitman79 6 months ago
@IrishHitman79 whilst i agree with you on that, most king tigers were only put out of action due to mechanical failure/lack of spare parts and fuel shortages. even then the biggest problem the germans faced was massive numerical inferiority, if you look at some of the stats, tank kill ratio was usually around 3:1 in favour of the germans, but the russians were producing about 8 times the number of tanks that germany was, after the failure of Barbarossa, germany was going to lose no matter what
Nathan5027 6 months ago
@Nathan5027 I agree to i was just saying in, Look at what Kurt Kinspel did in his Tiger1/2 tanks. If Germany had spent more time im making assault guns and Panzer 4s they would probably held out longer. I have one question did the Germans ever start to use Diesel engines in there tanks like the Russians?
IrishHitman79 6 months ago
@IrishHitman79 In retrospect, Germany could have increased their success chances by alot of smaller or larger adjustments, however, in the end it came down to simple numbers. Even IF Germany had beaten Britain in 40/41, in the end, the concerted efforts by russia and the US would have ultimately overpowered the German production. 10000 Shermans and 10000 T34 ... it was too much.
randomUnhold 6 months ago
@randomUnhold in hind sight, the war, at the beginning at least, was a very close run thing, first Britain and France fluffed, by nit invading Germany, then germany fluffs the battle of britain by switching to civilian targets and not keeping the pressure on airfields, followed by an immidiate invasion. then the fluff barbarossa by failing to consider cold weather preparation, or getting the japanese to attack the east of russia and tying up any reserve forces.
Nathan5027 6 months ago
@IrishHitman79 not sure, i know they planned to use diesel to power the generator in the maus, other than that i don't know. it's probable that if the war went on longer, they would have developed one, but as is, don't think so.
all that said, the early german tank designs were painfully flawed; thin, flat armour, light weaponry etc. that they found a 'gem' in the stug is incredible, but surely they could have used that as a basis to design a decent purpose built TD before the hetzer in 1944
Nathan5027 6 months ago
Comment removed
DieKampfgurke94 7 months ago
I love that tank its my favorite i preger WWII tanks than the ones that are build now
22tasos22 7 months ago
Seventy metric tons O_O with 190 mm of armor it truely is the king.
The only other tank from 1944 with more amror then this is the Jagdtiger!
DeltarPrime 7 months ago
@DeltarPrime The Jagdtiger was not a tank. The King Tiger is the heaviest tank ever to see the battlefield from the beginning of time through today.
Rooster1Cogburn 6 months ago
NICE
hva1967 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=KnYAC2_hnKg
''SAVING MY PRIVATES" (2011 - tom hanks)
a MUST see video. you need a good stomach - added yesterday
MrChatItOut 7 months ago
1940's tank
BadEgg55 7 months ago
geil, wo war das denn ?
melltor 7 months ago
@melltor
In Frankreich. Zumindest sieht man bei 0:28 eine französische Fahne im Hintergrund.
LotrFC 7 months ago
@LotrFC
tatsache, danke :)
gut aufgepasst inspector columbo ;)
melltor 7 months ago
Dear God.....
darnocslew 7 months ago
@0willsy01
In order to bypas and cut off the city as you suggested, the germans would of had to cross the Don to the N , and push NE, in the SE advance to and along the whole Volga to the Caspian Sea, cross the Volga on a broad front from at least Stalingrad to the Caspian Sea and establish secure bridgeheads along the whole river etc etc . An impossible task that wasnt even disscused.
Its better if you looked at a map , or an operational map to better understand the situation.
Cheers !
Cosmin1511 7 months ago
@0willsy01
No mate , Stalingrad couldnt be completelly encircled and cut off. Stalingrad is on the Volga, "with the back" to the Volga so to speak . Case Blue started and the germans advanced twards the SE along the Don river , which "guarded" the left flank of the advance. Near Stalingrad the Don turns S , and makes a bend , which the germans crossed , but they didnt cross the Don to the N , where the Vatutin and Danilov`s forces were stationed.
Cosmin1511 7 months ago
@0willsy01
But fact of the matter is , many of the german generals in the general staff were simply spinless carrierists , and many of them were involved in the decision makeing processes of the war . Generals like Alfred Jodl , Wilhelm Keitel , Walter von Brauchitsch or Goering etc etc , were not military geniuses .
Fact is all higher echelons of the armed forces were plagued with bureaucracy , and they dictated the course of the war , and large scale decisions , with Hitler`s overview ofc.
Cosmin1511 7 months ago
@0willsy01
Mate , Stalingrad couldnt be surrounded and cut off...as about 10% of the city was located on the far side of the Volga . Actually Stalingrad was bombed into rubble , and that actually helped the defending russians. The 6th army controled more than 90% of the city , but reinforcments and suplies were still comeing in over the Volga.
I know that when people think about german generals they imediatelly think about Guderian , Rommel , Manstein etc etc ... military geniuses.
Cosmin1511 7 months ago
@0willsy01
And also its becomeing more more apearent that actually Hitler wasnt to blame for many of the dissasters that have been imputed to him . in the early years of the at least he actually gave quite a lot of control , specially to the OKH , in the planing of the operations . As the war dragged on , he increassinglly became involved in the decision makeing procces , true . But i think the fault is shared by both Hitler and the general staff in equall meassure.
Cosmin1511 7 months ago
@0willsy01
No mate , actually there was no way the germans could take the Baku Oil Fields without takeing Stalingrad. Stalingrad had to be taken , couse it commanded the major suply routes on the Volga to the soviet forces defending in the S. And also advanceing to the oil fields without takeing Stalingrad would be insane , as the left flank of the advance would be dangerouslly exposed .
Problem is the germans split their forces and tryed to take them both at once , which is a big mistake .
Cosmin1511 7 months ago
@Cosmin1511 Hitler should have focused on Moscow, once you take Moscow you destroy Russian morale plus Stalin would have to flee his own capital. After Moscow was taken then Hitler should have focused on Stalingrad/Baku oil fields. -Hitler wanted to take Stalingrad because of its name STALINgrad...
SauronMouth 7 months ago
@SauronMouth
On the 14th of September 1812 Napoleon captured Moskow and burnt it to the ground, but failed to distroy the Russian army . Its widelly known what happened in the end.
In order to secure the Baku Oilfields , Stalingrad had to be taken ... and not just couse of its name ...but couse it was a very important strategic point. It commanded most of the comunication lines to the armies in the S defending the OilFields , to name just one of point of its importance .
Cosmin1511 7 months ago
Dear santa...
URO006 7 months ago 90
@URO006 So little but so much! lol
UkiKuki877 5 months ago
@UkiKuki877 No! no! So much but so much more! :)
URO006 5 months ago
Only wish a united Germany would assert themselves again!
Stadia2024 7 months ago
You do not win wars by capturing ground. You have to destroy your enemy (whoever that is).
ur2c8 7 months ago
King Tiger,the destroyer of asphalt
fictivisionDV 8 months ago
geil panzer rollen durch die straßen ist ja ganz wie in China
Thetb93 8 months ago
Listen to it purrrr!
wetend123 8 months ago
President Adams thank yu for your real insights
USExceptionalism 8 months ago
Kierowca musi się nauczyć jeździć tym kolosem, taka jazda jak widać na filmie natychmiast doprowadziła by załogę do wymiotów(choroba morska).
222DARECKI 8 months ago
@JohnQuincyAdams1 I know, it had it's problems, but I still wouldn't want to face off with one.... Also, I think the war would have lasted longer if they massed produced Panzer IV's instead of trying to go bigger & if Hitler would have let his commanders make the calls and not him.
TheAnimal590 8 months ago
@TheAnimal590-Field Marshall Erwin Rommel could have been in complete charge of Nazi Germany's military forces and they still would have resoundingly lost. Rommel knew this, which is why he wanted to sue for peace and end the war, before all of Germany was destroyed, (as it sadly was). For tanks to be an effective weapon, control of the air must be maintained and after the Battle of Britain with the Luftwaffe being virtually destroyed, Nazi Germany lost air control for the rest of the war.
JohnQuincyAdams1 8 months ago
@SwineNahNah
My arguement was that the Germans could have knocked the Soviets out in 1941 and effectively won, nation vs nation with what they had.
Had the Nazis not been evil and taken advantage of various liberated people, two examples being Jews & Ukrainians, they would have had a larger manpower base.
Puppet regimes can solve these problems to a large extent, the French people on a large part collaborated with the Nazis, establishment likes to hide this fact.
otester 8 months ago
@otester - Nazi Germany never had the industrial capacity to sustain and win WWII. With the Soviet Union specifically, Nazi Germany's supply lines were stretched to the breaking point because of the very long distances on the Russian Front.
JohnQuincyAdams1 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JohnQuincyAdams1
Regardless of what I say your going to copy and paste your original statement.
otester 8 months ago
@JohnQuincyAdams1true they could not win a long war, but they could have won the war. they made mistakes and had a LOT of 'bad luck'. Everyone(including the allies) thought Russia would be conquered in about 2 months. the Russian army was weak. but they made several big mistakes, like spreading the forces to thin, wait to long so Russian reinforcements could arrive etc.
brambodenbraber 8 months ago
@otester
If they were like "We liberated you wfrom evil Soviets, now come help us to defeat them completely, we ask only for cooperation", then yes, that would work. Istead they acted like idiots.
SwineNahNah 8 months ago
i love the nazist
valerossishit 8 months ago
@valerossishit - You love the, "nazist"? Amazing you'd publicly admit that and be embarrassed so much.
JohnQuincyAdams1 8 months ago
Ohhh, listen to that baby purr, just like a real tiger. lol :P Beautiful tank
TheAnimal590 8 months ago
@TheAnimal590 - It' s a good thing that a tanks beauty has nothing to do with its combat effectiveness. This thing was a mechanical nightmare and broke down frequently.
JohnQuincyAdams1 8 months ago
nice
a köti
(Tiger 2 German name is Königs tiger(köti))
sera117 8 months ago
now that is a tank , not this fancy things like m1a1 or leopard 2
vladimirmilojevic1 8 months ago
@vladimirmilojevic1 - It was a tank? Are you sure? It did keep many mechanics busy trying to fix the stupid thing with all the breakdowns it suffered.
JohnQuincyAdams1 8 months ago
Los Kameraden, Beschuss verlagern! Amiiiiis!
cribkillerCK 8 months ago
good job for the allies these things had such a short range
fdsdh1 8 months ago
It bounces off!
We didint penetrate their armor!
We are hit!
Fire, pull it out!
Bailt out!
xX0rt4Xx 8 months ago
@xX0rt4Xx Said the nazi scum
USExceptionalism 8 months ago
The hell are you talking about? Gosh what an extremist, i hate that kind of people. My quotes was taken by the game "World of Tanks". Damn.. search first, then criticize.
xX0rt4Xx 8 months ago
@megaLiopleurodon
MegaLiopIeurodon 8 months ago
kiss me, tiger!
grenzdebiler1 8 months ago
@grenzdebiler1 - That's not a Tiger tank. It's the unreliable, mechanical nightmare known as the King Tiger, or Tiger II.
JohnQuincyAdams1 8 months ago
im pretty sure they have the korean and vietnam wars listed in american books and they are referred to as wars or conflicts. How bout you actually pick up a book smtime ingus
LordOwn 8 months ago
germany should have built more assaults guns like StuGs and hetzers. they were very reliable vehicles that always worked without breaking down, cheap to build, easy to maintain and very effective. they could also easily be hidden because they were relatively small.
RexMineCraft 8 months ago
@RexMineCraft - Nazi Germany didn't have the industrial capacity to build more of *anything*. They were stretched to the limit and even *that* wasn't enough to sustain and win WWII, thank God.
JohnQuincyAdams1 8 months ago
@JohnQuincyAdams1
by more i meant not wasting resources on vehicles like the tiger ii but use those resources to build more stugs etc
RexMineCraft 8 months ago
@RexMineCraft - It wold have only delayed the inevitable anyway, as Nazi Germany never had the industrial capacity to sustain and win WWII, thank God.
JohnQuincyAdams1 8 months ago