I've seen a lot of movies - this has to be one of the earliest. I'm listening to Ben-Hur on the librivox audio site. What a powerful historical novel that has been repeatedly made into films - and influenced how milllions viewed Ancient Rome. It's not great literature, but....what a story!
If you think this version is crazy you should watch the 1876 film. The chariot race in that one took 3 months to film, 3200 people died, even extras and directors, and it cost $45,000 (2 trillion in today's dollars).
it looks like they are dancing thriller in the beginning probably that where Micheal got his moves from he watched this film and got inspired to make thriller
to al bloggers: ben-hur 1925--has been deleted--because of copyright issues--i am beginning to realize that almost everything on youtube is not copyrighted--bloggers--we have got to stop this--stop stuff from being removed --we must petition stuff from being removed or soon there won't be anything to watch on youtube
to GenghisKhan44--what in hell do you expect from 1907;fool! there were few technology for film-back then....a lot of stuff in film--hadn't even been invented yet...this film was just a few years from a nickelodeon...be real; huh?
That's no excuse for poor acting and poor camera shots.
And some subtitles like they had in the 1925 version would have made this much more palatable to the viewer. We're pretty much left to fill in the dialogue in our minds without subtitles.
I might say it is good only because it is one of the few things to have been caputred on film so early in the advent of film.
Seriously, your jackassery knows no boundaries. Celluloid was in it's infancy in 1907. Comparing this to a 1925 movie is like comparing a Apple II to a iMac.
@Lufttygger306 I guess you meant this one - watch?v=LlhNxHfyWTU thought you meant an earlier version of ben-hur first xD anywayz nice vid, maybe it was the inspiration to lassie?
@Lufttygger306 Instead of being so rude,maybe you should just go quietly elsewhere
napabar,I'd like to say thank you for making this 104 yr.old film available for silent film fans,like myself,to watch.
Also,some people(who are not idiots)will understand why this movie isn't exactly in great shape.I think it 's a sign of the times...they did the best with what they had at the time.
thank you for putting this up. even though it's not exactly the most technologically or artistically advanced, it's important historically and culturally.
when this movie was released it had the highest resolution of any movie at the time, at 2 by 3 pixles. Good grief... It's so grainy it could be used for food.
I was looking up Ben Hur upon hearing of the death of Charlton Heston. I knew there was a 1925 version which I have seen several times but had no idea that a 1907 version even existed!
They had the Asimov/Yellow Submarine font back in 1907?
HCShannon 2 days ago
I've seen a lot of movies - this has to be one of the earliest. I'm listening to Ben-Hur on the librivox audio site. What a powerful historical novel that has been repeatedly made into films - and influenced how milllions viewed Ancient Rome. It's not great literature, but....what a story!
XenagogueVicene 3 months ago
This is ooold o.o
gokharol 7 months ago
its funny now the Palestinians are Ben hur (being persecuted ) and the Jews are the romans eg bulldozing houses
xanderkhaan 8 months ago
Anything looks better with Ramon Novarro half naked in it!
mewhor 9 months ago
If you think this version is crazy you should watch the 1876 film. The chariot race in that one took 3 months to film, 3200 people died, even extras and directors, and it cost $45,000 (2 trillion in today's dollars).
MCskillz1234 11 months ago 2
Please do understand that this movie was made when creating movies was at it's "alpha"
TWproductions5667844 1 year ago
The film quality or entertainment value is irrelevant. It's film history.
View it as you would a Polaroid of a dinosaur: amazing that it exists.
brkeys 1 year ago
@brkeys ah ha....someone who actually gets it! Yes!
4MaryAnna 10 months ago
I think this is a crap print even for its age. The fact the soundtrack is so defunct seems to indicate this.
sweetlittle 1 year ago
IT WAS 1907 THEY WERE LUCKY IF THEY EVEN HAD ONE SHOT DONE.
SHUT UP STUPID PEOPLE STOP WATCHING IT IF YOU DONT LIKE IT SIMPLE AS THAT. NO ONE NEEDS YOUR COMMENTS JACKASSES!
LoveAj03 1 year ago 2
I thought this was another "lost" film. I'm impressed with this being posted on here.
Shame that so many people can't appreciate the primitive early films. They should grow up & learn/appreciate more about the history of cinema.
MadameLil 1 year ago 2
In the cast:Janet gaynor one bit ,auso one lsave girl.
mmmlima1 1 year ago
it looks like they are dancing thriller in the beginning probably that where Micheal got his moves from he watched this film and got inspired to make thriller
Haze6o4 1 year ago
When videos are forcibly removed from Youtube, it translates as "We have billions / millions and we want more". Period.
MrCombat1965 1 year ago
to al bloggers: ben-hur 1925--has been deleted--because of copyright issues--i am beginning to realize that almost everything on youtube is not copyrighted--bloggers--we have got to stop this--stop stuff from being removed --we must petition stuff from being removed or soon there won't be anything to watch on youtube
melollylolly 1 year ago
@melollylolly petitions are for dimwits - what good do you think a lame petition would do against a legitimate copyright claim?
BernardProfitendieu 1 year ago
to GenghisKhan44--what in hell do you expect from 1907;fool! there were few technology for film-back then....a lot of stuff in film--hadn't even been invented yet...this film was just a few years from a nickelodeon...be real; huh?
melollylolly 1 year ago 2
Interesting is this is...
er...
no. I do not like this at all. Perhaps it is the fuzzy quality that's distorting it, but I would hardly call what I saw on the screen "acting".
GenghisKhan44 2 years ago
It's from 1907, jackass.
napabar 2 years ago
That's no excuse for poor acting and poor camera shots.
And some subtitles like they had in the 1925 version would have made this much more palatable to the viewer. We're pretty much left to fill in the dialogue in our minds without subtitles.
I might say it is good only because it is one of the few things to have been caputred on film so early in the advent of film.
GenghisKhan44 2 years ago
Seriously, your jackassery knows no boundaries. Celluloid was in it's infancy in 1907. Comparing this to a 1925 movie is like comparing a Apple II to a iMac.
napabar 2 years ago
I've seen a movie from 1905 that is better than this... You almost cant see whats going on in this shit! I hate it!
Lufttygger306 2 years ago
Nobody care what you think.
napabar 2 years ago 10
@Lufttygger306 other ben hur version?
pinescar 1 year ago
@Lufttygger306 can you give me a link to it? is it available here on yt?
dancingdragonify 11 months ago
@dancingdragonify It's called Rescued by Rover. It was made on a budget of 7 pounds, 13 shillings and 9 pence
Lufttygger306 11 months ago
@Lufttygger306 I guess you meant this one - watch?v=LlhNxHfyWTU thought you meant an earlier version of ben-hur first xD anywayz nice vid, maybe it was the inspiration to lassie?
dancingdragonify 11 months ago
@Lufttygger306 Instead of being so rude,maybe you should just go quietly elsewhere
4MaryAnna 10 months ago
@Lufttygger306 Instead of being so rude,maybe you should just go quietly elsewhere
napabar,I'd like to say thank you for making this 104 yr.old film available for silent film fans,like myself,to watch.
Also,some people(who are not idiots)will understand why this movie isn't exactly in great shape.I think it 's a sign of the times...they did the best with what they had at the time.
4MaryAnna 10 months ago
thank you for putting this up. even though it's not exactly the most technologically or artistically advanced, it's important historically and culturally.
narfanderson 2 years ago
The 1925 version is better...
Supenmanu 2 years ago
Comment removed
NIKlLZ 2 years ago
Celluloid was in it's infancy in 1907. Comparing this to a 1925 movie is like comparing a Apple II to a iMac.
napabar 2 years ago 9
Well made for 1907 standards.
electricmastro 2 years ago 3
Great, brand new bio (Charlton Heston: An Incredible Life: Revised Edition) at amazon!
Bestmanme08 2 years ago
Now... normally i can't stand black'n'white films, but this is thge one exception, it's great!
14AuburnNotGinger09 2 years ago
very nice!
TheTurnOfTheCENTURY 2 years ago
Great, brand new bio (Charlton Heston: An Incredible lIfe) at amazon. It's by Michelle Bernier!
BestManMe09 3 years ago
1950s ones better
jamesmorrell91 3 years ago 3
Even the 1925 version is better than this.
noqa 3 years ago 5
senacional, todo una joya
jocadi11 3 years ago
1959 version is the best.
Imran500 3 years ago 12
when this movie was released it had the highest resolution of any movie at the time, at 2 by 3 pixles. Good grief... It's so grainy it could be used for food.
Just kidding, good movie.
rasarx1 3 years ago
I was looking up Ben Hur upon hearing of the death of Charlton Heston. I knew there was a 1925 version which I have seen several times but had no idea that a 1907 version even existed!
kmillard 3 years ago 2
Unbelieveble, isn't it?
This is actually more then a 100 years now!
rightroad9 3 years ago 2
WOWm that's true!
mkp 3 years ago 3
Siggi-Lee´s aera!
beerdeddi 3 years ago
Fantastic....
hollywoodclassics 3 years ago
this is absolutely unbelievable
sjpc33 3 years ago
Why is the title in the Yellow Submarine/Asimov font?
HCShannon 4 years ago
Maybe Yellow Submarine/Asimov fonts derive from some kind of "Jugendstil" (abt. 1900).
Baumbart79 3 years ago 2
Either that, or it was tagged on in a later restoration, because it looks completely inappropriate for the film.
blofeld39 3 years ago
MUY BUENA
claudiobalaio 4 years ago
Hi I am a big fan of silent films, i was wondering where did you get the 1907 of ben-hur at?
gregorkrause 4 years ago