Added: 5 months ago
From: onrpg
Views: 16,662
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (66)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This review sucks ass, and should NOT be taken into consideration due to the potential amount of incorrect information.

  • MY BROTHER IS GAY!

  • YOU ARE ALL FAGS!!!!

  • How can you mess up SPGs (arty) and Tank destroyers?!

  • Get your facts right son. Alot of your info was off and you don't seem to be very experienced in it. Get your shit together boy.

  • Good review thanks ! :)

  • I guess this should be more of a "First Impression" than a review. Then again, what most people are complaining about are things you would expect from a "guide".

  • LOL at 7:35 he hits an ally and sets him on fire...

  • Ok so dude made a review about a game. Now how can someone review a game and not mention anything negative at all. Who's dick are you sucking JamesBl0nde? No game is totally perfect. You didnt mention anything about flaws in the game, and yes there are some. If your going to review games - do honest reviews. Focus on Pros and Cons. Your talking like a saleman for this game all the way through the review.

    You didnt exactly get to the higher tier tank battles either you n00b!!

  • Omg this guy is talking more shit then my wife.....

  • Just .. Lol.

  • Comment removed

  • Lol made it sound "cool" to auto-aim xD

  • Tank destroyers are the low tanks with the front mounted gun. What you are calling TDs are actually SPGs (and SPGs are the once with a different view when you zoom)

  • Think I'm just going to mirror the last 6 pages of replies.

    If you're going to write a review and pass judgement, learn your subject. The fact he's cruising around in T1-2 tanks and using auto-aim is pretty unforgivable. It's like writing a review of a car without taking it out of first gear.

    This review is chock full of general ignorance, luckily it's a F2P game so everyone can try it for themselves.

  • It's an SPG, not a tank destroyer!!! O.o

    OMFG, bad review! O.o

    Read the forums, play more games... don't make anything w/o at least 100 games

  • OMG, dude if I was your boss you would be fired by now, seriously this is one of the most junk reviews I ever seen you don't know anything about the game you just ramble and "try" to explain everything as you see it, and you to a horrible job. You watched the tutorial videos and try to reproduce now? That's your definition of "review", any retard can read the first sentences from wikipedia.

    

  • An utterly clueless review. Judging by the tanks he used, he spent easily less than an hour in game. He often mixes up terms, he does not describe the intricacies of sloped armour and the angle of fire on enemy tanks, he does not define the difference between consumables and upgrades and he fails to be accurate when he mentions historical examples.

    Plus, using an autocannon? Trololol.

  • He just explained what the game had i didn't hear any thoughts about it

  • wow this guy bearly knows something about this game, there are over 130 tanks,

    german, russian, usa , and the 1 chinese premium (type 59), there are alot more maps, the ones you call "tank destroyers" are actually the spg's, this game includes alot of battle modes: clan wars, you can create platoons with 2(standard account) up to 3 friends if you have premium account and there is a huge learning curve because of the shier number of different tanks and tactics in this game.

  • always auto aim ... u suck :P

  • well this is not very good intro for world of tanks too many things are wrong, like the TD aerial view cos its not TD's view it is SPG's view.

    And some of the tanks arent even ever built u would know this if u would have bothered to read the tech tree a bit when u klick on the tanks (or in the store).

    There are things like "Never entered mass production", "Existed only in blueprints", "Production were discontinued" and so on...

  • Eh... 1:10

    " ************* you bad guy "

  • TANK DESTROYERS WITH WEACK ARMOUR????? FUCKING CHECK THE AMERICAN TANK DESTROYER T95

  • Nice review :)

    You pretty much explain all the important parts of them game :D Wrote a review myself as a school thing. One thing i love about WoT is that its not just a copy of WoW with all the awesome weapons being the ones you buy, no in WoT the best tanks are the ones you play to get. You can buy pretty good tanks. But for most the time they get destroyed pretty fast. That's one thing i love about World of tanks. Hope you had fun playing it! Nice review :)

  • probably like everyone else is saying you

    u need many more battles before u make review...

    cruise control is very usefull on slow tanks..

    dont use auto aim, it sucks...

    those are spg with view from above not tank destroyer...

    why is this even on wot site anyway

  • Good that he says you can lock on with right-click , now all noobs will do this and our modules won't be demolished that often :)

  • Am I the only one who thinks this is useful review? The whole point is to show to the NEW PLAYERS what the game is like... U won't start with tier 4 tanks do you? And do people with tier 5 tanks still watch reviews? Who cares if he rides tier 1-2 tanks, ITS A REVIEW! nuff said -.-

  • @Wjews this ain't very useful...many things are wrong

  • Dude you suck!

  • Its not the TD´s that got the aerial view but the SPG´s dude....

  • It was like a World of Warcraft review from a level 10 player

  • u forgived to mention that usually u go against 3 tiers higher enemys and sometimes right even 4 tiers higher enemys which is the balncers fault!

  • noob review

  • I really think you guys should realize this is meant to be an INTRODUCTION into the game, not a documentary. He got most of the facts right, and what he didn't get right is what a newbie would see/think.

    Pretty hilarious stupid the WoT fans seem to be. It's like they've got their head stuck up their ass...

  • well you should have played a little bit longer before revieuwing. and pls dont mess up the tankdestroyers and SPG's...

  • lol you got only 1 kill at the end of the battle. LOOOOOOOOOOL

  • Don't review WoT if you still use autoaim...

  • @CousCous102 damn true

  • They could not find a more ill suited reviewer!

    The bloke don't know anything about "Tanks".

  • @fearofgodblablabla

    Amen brother

  • Oh, the game chooses the maps for you, that's very nice! Especially when you play Campinovka for the 4th time in a row

  • James & Onrpg.com, you should delete this crap review. This shows that you've got barely 1 day of game play, which should be at lest 1 week. And no research at all. You got everything wrong (example: some tanks are only blueprints such as the E-75). You don't bring up any of the problems that the community are screaming about (overpowered artillery). All this shows is that you need to put out something, and you fucked it up! I like the game but not because of this crapy video.

  • Tank destroyers cant shoot from airial view, spg`s can.

  • I can see u did this review in maximum 2 days ... WoT is a game that u learn in days , but u master in months. You let urself be deceived by the apparent simply mechanics of it , but u did not play long enough to find out it's real depth.

    As a 6 month WoT player , I find myself very dissapointed in this review , since it does not do any real justice to this game and it lacks any real depth.

    Good day to you sir

  • auto aim noob -.-

  • Auto aim is very inaccurate.

  • I love it how he says this game has "2nd to none graphics"... Come on seriously?

    Oh and runs smoothly? You're getting an average of 20fps, which I doubt to be because of your pc, probably more because of no multicore support.

    I guess this another review bought by wargaming...

  • how come this  managed on the main page of WoT? pffff....

  • and you can auto-run by r or f

  • I was hopping to see like, Maus, E-100, or even IS-7, but you have LTractor... I'm more angry on WG for getting this on client and promoting this.

  • not all tanks have semi-auto canons....

  • Comment removed

  • Damn you ARE blonde...."Right click lock on" that is the noobst shit you can do.

  • lol at 1:14 u can see someone spamming the chat hahaha :)

  • The TD's are pretty weak armored? True, true....the T95 has just a weak armor of 305 mm.

  • I can see this review is made by a newcomer to WoT. I dont know why it even appeared on main WoT page.

  • I mean no offence to you,but you really shouldn't make a game review with so few battles done.

  • Autoaim sucks

  • Nice review, nicely edited and narrated.

    Couple of notes:

    1. Using the right mouse button to lock (autoaim) targets can work in early games. Will not work later in the game, as you must aim for certain parts of tanks to penetrate their armor. So don't use it.

    2. Tank destroyers behave mostly like tanks in the game and they don't have top-down view of the battlefield. ONLY SPG's can have the top down view.

    P.S. At the end you shoot and set one of your own tanks on fire. Aim for red tanks! ;)

  • i really do think that, you shouldnt make game review about WoT after like 50 battles. there is so much "errors" in this vid when you describe tank, like when you speak about artillery, you use tank destroyer term. and that is just WRONG.

    you should play untill you hit 1,5-2k battles and you have atleast one tier10 heavy tank and many other lower tier tanks wich are different types.

  • Very good review of a very good game. To everyone else seeing this, I highly recommend this game, even if you aren't into military stuff.

  • Just one thing, the Spg (self propelled artillery gun) is the one with the aerial view, the tank destroyer is the one without turret (except two of them :P)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more