As an aside, I just realized something; (IINM) If I'm Not Mistaken; i didn't apply for a SS card (SSN in the US, a SIN in Canada; others(?)) until i was a teenager ...hrmm
I wonder if the Birth "Certificate" is the Trust account setup for the "Legal Fiction Corp" aka; JOHN DOE , but it's not "activated" until one receives a SSN/SIN ... (ergo, transfer of PowerOfAttorney possibly?)
..but i do NOT doubt my BIRTH itself (the Trust) is being held as collateral, and being traded upon daily.
Do yourselves a favor and visit sites such as nakedcapitalism[dot]com and learn about how Big Finance really works, and how YOU are being robbed/raped/enslaved to Global International Corps, which you defend so viahemently; Personally, i believe the world would be a MUCH better place if even just the Fortune500 vanished off the planet.
You defend the very same people that have boxes of condoms they use on you, on a daily basis. I hope you're happy, but you certainly aren't Truthful/Honest
I am so sick and tired of hearing all you Non-Sovereign whiners cry about Taxes, and how you think Sovereigns want to freeload -- the EXACT OPPOSITE is the truth ; and we know that your unfounded attacks are derived from said truth, in order to foster psyop attacks. It's where your disinformation and propoganda come from.
If there are some sincere misguided people who really think Statute-Imposed *Taxes*, and IRS Fed Income Tax upon sovereigns will un-Bankrupt a Nation(s) ..more..
I'm only 17 and this pisses me right the fuck off. What are they doing you want to not pay taxes be a Canadian. Live some where else how about the poorest pars of Africa not very many rules there. And then we can bring the grateful people back to canada. Soldiers have died for this group to try and ruin the government, you wake every morning safe and health because of health care. If you don't like being a canadian citizen that supports our government then there a million people who would love
@Frankthetanka5 Another poor ignorant soul...you Canadiens and us Americans TOOK this land remember...your ancestors didn't come from Canada...and if they did you are already sovereign and just don't have a clue. Why do you care so much about "the government"...how about the fucking people? Don't the people have rights?
careful .. i hear (through your words) you allowing the frustration to claim your heart.. it is difficult, i know
Love
p.s. *Someone* marked atleast one of your recent comments as SPAM ; i tried to click the "Not Spam" button (didn't seem to have any affect) -- Hopefully the Channel-Op can remedy the situation, eh "awkword519"? ; thanks
You have the right to travel......it's called the bus. If you hurt someone your insurance is there to cover the medical bills of your victim. Every action you make in life effects someone in some way.
"Every action you make in life effects someone in some way"
well spoken truth
Love
p,s, spell-checking self from last post; "fraudulent" which BTW, is one of the 3 main things Sovereigns (and All People) would be UNLAWFUL, if practiced. The other 2? Never cause Harm, Never Breach the Peace
Homemade plates, no insurance, no license, doesn't pay income tax all equates to - fucktards that end up in jail. Save yourself a lot of grief, don't buy into this bullshit!
it's not that simple, son - and you are wrong in your premise anyways; Sovereigns do NOT abdicate Responsibilty for their actions -- quite the opposite.
Paying a for-profit Corporation with one's *hard earned* cash
(yes, hard-earned, not paper-shuffling, high-frequency algorithmic trading, foreign currency rehypothecation, blatant *fraudelent* MBS, CDOs, CDSs nonsense) for ones own actions *is* abdicating Responsibility -- something most every non-Sovereign seems quite cozy with.
@enoufsaid I know nothing of maritime law, I never use it. Being responsible for contracts worth 5 to 7 figure sums, I need to know a bit; just like the Highway Act, as I DRIVE. Free people working hard? Some spend their lives on their ass writing 3 replies at a time to people on youtube O.o; debate this with anyone who has ever been a slave. As for the republic, US law like most western law is passed through a democratically elected house, therefore it is inherently democratic.
bingo; look up UCC-1, and learn about Admiralty/Marirtime Law (the law of the high seas) ..note the COMMERCial Code nature written in the UCC.
and um, no, you seem to be a honor student drop-out, yet somehow managed to earn a Law Society degree ; Constitutional Law you appear also to be extremely lacking in -- I AM NO Lawyer, nor am i attacking you, Please understand, your comments seem to only make sense in How you are able to Game-The-Corrupt-System
... The Declaration of Independence transferred / proclaimed Declared! Sovereignty from the Crown to the Sovereign Citizens of each of the 13 States! The Constitution was created to Seal-into-LAW our unalienable RIGHTS and to establish and limit a fictional-govt-entity, a Corp, through the creation of Wash. D.C. as federalist entity, through which WeThePeople have the LAWFUL and INHERENT right to abolish, as we so choose.
@wierdwesterner I would disagree...just because they are "democratically" elected doesn't mean they make choices that are best for the people...especially with the 12 billion+ a year spent on lobbying(that's just the legal stuff). Maybe 150 years ago the elected officials had some sense of responsibility towards the people. Now it's strictly towards the corporations...giving us the choice of electing the guy given millions by Monsanto and the guy given millions by Citi Bank is hardly democratic.
@enoufsaid Oh, and in case you don't get the message, I'm not interested in any further debate with you.... at least jazzyrick seemed like a sober nutter.
Yes, LEGALLY *and* LAWFULLY, the Officers-of-the-Corp MUST *always* provide 3 pieces of ID!
a) their Badge and Nameplate
b) Business Card
c) (i forget atm, heh)
Why? Because, they are luring one to engage in Contract with them. *They* (not sovereign citizens) are *Legally Liable* and bound to their own Acts/Statutes/rules/regs/ordinances.
If they do NOT submit 3 pieces of ID, they are NOT to be trusted to be acting as a LAWFULLY sworn in peace officer.
Every Public Place/Thing is Owned by WeThePeople. The Government only exists due to WeThePeople -- and in order for agents of the gov to LAWFULLY operate and enforce LAW, they must first Pledge an Oath to uphold the Constitution, 1st and foremost -- every Statute/Regulation is nothing more than rules bound to Legal Fictions under which THEY, the agents, must operate and abide by, NOT Sovereign Citizens that are not wearing their 'legal fiction cloak'.
He can't and won't. Many commentors that are non-Free-thinkers, Pro-Police-State are (possibly paid) provocateurs/agents of the State.
For all others that ever read this;
Act always in a respectful, non-disrespecting manner, lest your honor get lost-to-the-wind. These provocateurs are even beyond name-calling foul mouth ignoramuses, so their comments and strawmen args shouldn't even illicit a reply (though, i was suckered into it too atleast once, heh), once any ad-hominem is made
If you think Driving (or even being a passenger) is too dangerous an activity then don't engage in it, period.
Why is it so hard for you expansionists-at-all-costs to realize that the best (cleanest, safest, self-sustaining) economies are the Local Economies. Why does everyone drive so friggin much? Will the Economy Implode if we don't?! um.. look around, it's imploding anyways, thanks to your short-sighted, nonfree-thinking cage with which you've allowed your mind to be enslaved.
@enoufsaid for someone with the YT name enoufsaid, you sure yap a lot. People are licensed to drive motor vehicles for the same reason they are licensed to fly planes, of ANY SIZE and not licensed to ride a bicycle. People with a reasonable amount of grey matter understand that having to take a test to prove your ability to operate a machine that can kill and injure others, is a necessity. Fuckwit.
@mapache11 You're assuming that everyone with a "drivers license" is competent to drive? Have you ever been on a public street in your life? Do you truly think this is true?
@jazzyrick No I'm not assuming that. I am stating a fact. You assume that the streets would be the same without licencing and testing. ROFLMFAO. Have a look at the drivers in any Third World country..where people regularly drive without any testing.
@mapache11 The name calling really gives your assertion SO MUCH MORE credibility that I should just give up now...LOL...
A fact? Really? So you've driven in a country with no testing or speed limits? And if you have you were probably the one who felt like a fish out of water since you weren't used to driving in such conditions.
@jazzyrick Your argument isn't incorrect BECAUSE you are a fuckwit, it is wrong AND you are a fuckwit. There's a difference.
A simple google search of "driving in the thrid world" will provide you with ample evidence that a lack of driving education makes the roads less safe. But common sense should aready have told you that much.
@jazzyrick Even someone with as limited an intellectual capacity as you, can use a search engine like Google. Or even try YT. Maybe type "Driving in Cairo". Don't be so lazy.
Q. how did the "streets" get that way? Where decency and yielding right-of-way to your fellow sovereign made you 'take (time, as valuable as your own) from your brother/sister?
@mapache11 You tell me...you are the one making assertions...not me...If you can find where I said any streets would be safer anywhere for any reason I'll gladly eat my words...
@jazzyrick You believe that nobody needs to drive at the posted speed limits. This is exactly what it is like in the less developed world. I said that it is safer driving in the developed world, where people are required to pass tests to ensure that they know traffic laws and how to safely operate motor vehicles.
It was never "common sense' that the earth was flat. It was what some uneducated people believed, but that no sailor who had been more than 30 miles from shore did.
@mapache11 I've never said "nobody needs to drive posted speed limits" either...you are putting words in my mouth. Again...show me where I said that and I'll eat my words.
I simply asked you a few questions...so again...
You said "Only an imbecile would believe that NOT having to pass any tests will make the streets safer." yet you have presented zero proof.
Indeed; having license+insurance+registration enables the richest snobby brats to behave maliciously and callously -- being disrespectful, dishonorable, unkind without justice! Not to mention the new car their daddy buys them once they smash up their toy. They are nothing more than State-Licensed road-raging lunatics acting in a Legal Fictional capacity withOUT having to pay the consequences for their misdeeds and disrespect they bestow upon our fellow brothers/sisters.
Ohh .. in your incessant rantings and maniacal outbursts you didn't clearly state your case;
Are you asking-> What's to keep everyone from buying their own plane and operating it *privately and not-in-commerce* without being licensed? If so, then;
Sure -- it's about Risk and Liability -- with Sovereignty comes MUCH, if not ALL Responsibility -- I see no reason why one cannot operate their own plane LAWFULLY...but yes, they will be completely accountable for their actions...
...I know this scares the crap out of you, and many others and that's ok, but.. it's the LAW. (ergo, Sane/Rational people will NOT attempt to engage in this behaviour, atleast not without Proper Training, and Liability Insurance).
If you don't like it, you are free to leave (Hence another beautiful concept embodied in our Constitution via the Founders).
apologies, but i cannot overlook this imbecilic post;
When one flies on a COMMERCIAL passenger jet, they are IN CONTRACT with the Corp with whom they purchased their ticket. That contract states that a Professional Licensed Pilot shall be flying the plane.
So, not only are you being short-sighted and ignorant in your erroneous attempt at an analogy, but you fail to distinguish between;
haha, right on -- not to mention discoboy there doesn't even realize that WE are keeping HIM and the Officers-of-the-Corp safe, and enabling them to have the Privilege to be Paid/Compensated for functioning as a *Peace Officer* (Unfortunately, almost all only operate in their Officer-of-the-Corp enforcement capacity only). What a shame
Shame, heh -- but yep, it's all Unlawful 'color of law' crap -- Welcome to our Police State ;-)
That said; it;s stated clearly on BOTH your SSN/SIN card and Birth Certificate that they are NOT to be used for ID purposes; WE make the mistake of using these as such; The ONLY Document one needs to PROVE who they are is their "Live Birth Record" (not Birth Cert., but an actual Stamped Copy via State Auth (Sec of State, or HHS, or Vital Statistics, i forget) "Live Birth Record")
...and this carries over to my earlier comment about the Co-Existance of *Man* and *Man w/Legal Fiction Jacket* -- so it's OK to 'Register' *if* you desire to enjoy whatever Benefits and Privileges said registration may provide for you (Note; You are then subjected to follow all the Rules/Acts/Statutes/Regs)
...then it's all just a matter of "Which *capacity* was one operating under at that time" whenever a complaint is made. I can see there being millions of Falsified/Erroneous complaints made daily at first, yep. Not to mention any Hardship/Harassment/Assault/Battery/Illegal Detention endured, heh
Apologies; I meant Unlawful Detention, not Illegal (as Legal/Illegality does NOT APPLY in this context--i.e., when we are NOT wearing our 'legal fiction coats'), and we need to vigilant in making a Clear and Concise distinction each and every time.
I cannot stress this enough-and this will really turn the tables on these Robber Barons. [..more]
f we so choose to operate wearing our LEGAL FICTION JACKET, then not only are we acting Employees/Trustees of said Corp. we registered/licensed/contracted with, but . We Ought to be Paid (Compensated).
And as Agents of the State; the Corps that WE LICENSE -- that extract OUR natural resources (Mountain Top Removal / DeForestation, Coal, Oil, Gas, Strip mining, Ore mining, etc) ought to be sending us weekly/monthly/quarterly Dividends for the PRIVILEGES we Provide to them.
Oh yeah, and We do NOT OWN our Drivers Licenses, nor our SSN/SIN cards. (as i'm sure you're aware). Just pointing it out to others possibly reading along.
Look at / Read the back of each of those aforementioned cards
You have shown through your many many posts that you clearly and intentionally try to avoid making any clear and concise distinctions between operating in PUBLIC COMMERCE, and NOT or as an Agent of the State, or NOT
--- Same holds true for your intentional dismissal of Legal Definitions (Blacks / Bouvier Law Dicts)
--- Same holds true for inability to distinguish between Travel and Drive.
At this point in time, i actually believe there might be some middle-ground usages here, where BOTH systems can exist--"equally and separately" based off the premise of: "Which *capacity* was one operating under" at the time of Offense/Complaint.
IOW, We should be able to wear our 'legal fiction coat' whenever we decide to engage in Public Commerce, (and when we are, we are legally bound to all the Acts/Statutes/Regs) however, most times we are NOT wearing this Fictional Wrapper.
Curious, had she already had her fee-schedule filed and properly set-up, and did she Notify the officers-of-the-corp. that by pulling her over and detaining her that not only was that Activating her FS (of which she should have a Copy of handy, and had presented to each of them) but they were *each* to be subjected to Civil Suits for Harrassment.
Did she immediately say No Consent/Contract? and "I am convening a Court of Public Record" from the outset? (and recorded it?)
Ofourse; the whole system is basically Corrupt - thanks for that affirmation. Thing is, what do you intend to do about it now that you affirm it? (other than whine and portray how much of a coward you really are and that most Freemen posting here are courageous enough to stand up for themselves, their families, and yes -- their fellow brothers/sisters, such as yourself, whom seems semi-knowledgeable, but even the ignorant).
Note: US Reconstruction Act of 1868 - 14th Amendment which created a defacto US Citizenship (the D.C. United States Federal Corp), ..as opposed to *State Citizen*, which every non-colored was prior, and as such, enjoyed Natural/Common Law Rights.
Note;
1913 Jekyll Island offspring (FRS+IRS+Fed Income Tax).
-- The killer blow was the 1933 Emergency Banking Act which basically suspended US Dec-of-Indep/Constitution when the US admitted BANKRUPTCY to International Banking Cartel
US Census Bureau, asking "Are you a US Citizen" and most unsuspecting State Citizens over the years doing this -> *[x]* as affirming they are now turning over their Rights as Sovereign State Citizenship --> US Fed Corp employee/trustee status (D.C, Corp.). Trickery and Deception (and even moreso today --> Confusion) These are the tools of Satan
This 10 part series from circa *1995* explains it;
watch?v=hK4cEoE7mCM
"John David Van Hove aka Johnny Liberty part 1 of 10"
The population of people that lived in the ~60 sq. miles known as Washington D.C. were already *US Citizens* prior to 1868, not State Citizens, which is also why they couldn't Vote. They are/were already considered Corporation employees, and as such, were required to obey all the Acts/Statutes enacted. They were/are *legally* bound, as we all are, it seems, which is a Farce and a Presumption from TPTB only. However, WeThePeople need to let them know.
@MidnightWins2 That judges are or are not willing to recognize as a right is no more relevant than King George's willingness or unwillingness to recognize rights. Neither judges nor kings nor presidents are the source of our rights. The armed people, willing to shed the blood of patriots and tyrants at the altar of liberty, are the source and guarantor of all rights.
@Kundry Okay, so where are the armed people ready to enforce your rights on the matter of driving without a license? It looks to me like the vast majority of people support requiring drivers to be licensed.
@Kundry Yeah, two nuts killed a couple of cops over a traffic stop. And then the police tracked them down and put a hundred bullets in them. So when do the rights get enforced, then?
@MidnightWins2 Rights get recognized or suppressed when either patriots or tyrants tire of dying for their recognition or suppression. Thomas Jefferson never claimed that the tree of liberty only demanded a little blood to flourish. Liberty needs regular nourishment.
@MidnightWins2 Do they really support is or is it "just the way things are"? I don't think anyone would argue that we would hope someone would be proficient in driving before taking to the public roads, but there are many people with "drivers licenses" out there that have to reason doing so. There are millions of bad drivers out there...just because they have a "license" doesn't make them a good driver...it's a friggen piece of paper...
@Blahblobify No sir. I am being tortured in my own home in Canada. Crippled, in pain, and if I walk or stand too long I will get blood clots in my leg. I cannot take care of daily functions such as grocery shopping, banking, post office, lawyer, government agencies, or anywhere else. I was run over by a train caused by negligence of the railway. I will not be forced to be isolated in my little apartment with no Sun, no fresh air, and hungry.MY RIGHT TO TRAVEL WILL NOT BE IMPEDED BY GOVERNMENT!
Oh please tell us more. I've lived around train tracks all my life and I can't imagine getting run over by a train and it being the fault of the train.
@Blahblobify Yeah you are an idiot. I was 24 years old, coming home from my job as crane operator for Algoma Centtral Railway in Northern Ontario, with at least 42 crew members, all our gear, and personal belogngs. Train derailed, threw me right onto the track head first at about 40 mils an hour, and then smacked into my back and dragged me, then the second car severely crushed my ankle. Since then the government has tried to murder me by neglecting my injuries and taking my rights. Eugenics.
Good show of respect all around, but if someone waves all the benefits and services of the State shouldn't they find their own road to travel on? These ones are owned and regulated by the State and tax payers are allowed to travel on them under license and registration?
@marcusorilius Humans own the road not the state which is actually a corporation., A human being is free to contract or not contract, a citizen has to follow the corporation's rules [state] It' complicated because it the system, is set up to be so, robbing us of what is rightfully our birthright. Remember you own a portion of the commonwealth which is the whole Earth.
@MidnightWins2 Again you do not have it exactly right and are just stating propaganda. Income tax pays only the interest on the debt the corporation [gov] owes to the people, it is the government's debt not the peoples's debt.
@MidnightWins2 Yes I know what you mean... How ever one can easily argue that buddy does pay tax you think his car is running on peace love and happiness? You do realize in Canada a massive chunk of the price of gas is tax, right?
Quit supporting the government when it is obviously corrupt and thieving.
@aluckyshot I'm not "supporting" the government. I just object to people who spread misinformation about what they can legally do. If you "travel" on the road with a vehicle without a license or registration, and the government catches you, armed men will come for you, take you away, and put you in a cage. That is the reality. If you want to change that, that's fine, but there is no point in pretending that it doesn't already happen.
@MidnightWins2 I'm afraid you are the one who is misinformed. I've said it before here, but do you understand what a "driver" is by legal definition...not what you use in everyday language. You do realize there is a difference right? Haven't we gone over this before? Isn't it YOU spreading misinformation?
@marcusorilius The roads are owned by the people not the State. If you do a Dun& Bradstreet search you will find the "State" is a corporation. When a government engages in commerce they lay down their sovereignty and become like any other corporation see Clearfield Doctrine. A license is permission to engage in commerce all DL's are licenses to operate a business. A driver is someone that is being paid to operate a motor vehicle. Why do you think the people are mad its not freedom it's slavery.
@Huey7703 Tax lovers are road lovers because this is always their first argument."What about the roads man" At present roads are supposed to be paid for with the gas tax. Half or more of your income is taxed that's more than a serf in old England. Enjoy your roads.
@Huey7703 Agreed...isn't that what gas taxes are for? It's called a use tax. If you don't use it why should you have to pay for it? You are assuming that INCOME TAX goes to pay for roads.
I was part of the Freeman society and a "sovereign" after my friend told me about it. What he FAILED to mention is that this group is actually a secret society of HOMOSEXUALS. They make up all these fake laws as a hobby because they couldn't become cops or lawyers (they're alldeadbeats) but really their agenda is male buttsex. WARN YOUR FRIENDS. IM SERIOUS!!!!
@aj4450165 your mind is truly deranged. you are far from knowing anything about freemasons. secret buttsex agenda? really? why? there could be no world with out laws it would be devoid of order and peace with chaos reigning as an ultimate force.
@hermanington There is a thing called the common law for Americans in 49 states that is the law of the people. What you call a law is nothing more than the corporate rules for their employees. The problem is the judges don't obey the(common) law and the juries are stupid and they think like you that the statutes apply to everyone.
@MidnightWins2 Every state has a clause like this" 2.01 Common law and certain statutes declared in force" This is in Florida Statutes where I live. It is the first thing after the definitions. When they say Law of The Land this is what they mean. The Common law is in effect everywhere except the territories and or all land owned by The United States of America. This land is called The United States this is what Obama is president of. It didn't even take five seconds to prove you wrong.
@jazzyrick Look at the symbols. Colorado too displays the fascii. We are all governed by Rome, with the Pope being the Emperor, while their Jewish partners in banking run the scams that make them rich, and the U.S. supplies the military might to gain control of dissenting countries. The Roman emporers never died, they became Popes. Constantine and the Jews knew creating a religion to capture the hearts and minds of the flock would invade all countries and make them submit to Roman/Jewish rule.
@Blahblobify You will be surprised what the Judge does. Most of our problems stem from our ignorance of procedure and law. When we take a benefit privilege and declare ourselves to be US citizens then we become engaged in a contract where we lay down our sovereignty and operate in the capacity of a person. It is the jury we need to educate so that the"King" can not just throw us in jail because we violate his wishes. But some of what you say is true but for different reasons mostly our ignorance
@Blahblobify Your capacity to understand is your issue not mine. Some reading of case law and history is necessary. Perhaps a video game will be produced that will enable you to gain an understanding of status issues and contract law. It may be your only hope.
@Blahblobify Let me ask you this Blah...do you know what the legal definition of "driving" is in the US code?
Do you know how money is created? Do you know the difference between PRIVATE and PUBLIC finances? Do you understand what a contract is and how to contract legally?
I, unlike you, do not assume what people know or do not know.
Those who know the least often know it the loudest.
@Blahblobify Tell that to the Untied States government...it's in their own code.
Notice the "and used for commercial purposes" part. Do you use your car for commercial purposes?
18 USC Chapter 2 part 31.Look it up yourself
(6) Motor vehicle.— The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
@jazzyrick That is the federal code. It is state governments that license drivers, and there are no caveats about it only applying to "commercial" driving. Judges have ruled against the "I'm only travelling" or "I refuse to contract" arguments many, many times before.
@MidnightWins2 I'm sure they have many times. The understanding of court and how to separate the "private" right to travel and the "public" statutes and understanding how court procedures actually work, not to mention stupid "sovereigns" who "read some stuff on the internet", is certainly the cause for that.
The "sovereign" thing isn't something you just become by saying it. It's a long process of learning who you are, how to deal with the public, and knowing court procedures inside and out.
@jazzyrick If judges are willing to enforce these "sovereign" rights, then why do they constantly state publicly that they are worthless? I mean, it can't be that they're corrupt. If they were, then they wouldn't enforce these rights at all.
@MidnightWins2 No they aren't "corrupt"...well most of them aren't corrupt anyway. They are simply working within the system as it has evolved. If you've noticed from some of my previous posts there is a difference between "private" and "public" court procedures...and as such any "private" decision or case is just that...PRIVATE. Thus won't be in court records as a recognized decision or however you want to view it.
@MidnightWins2 I also might mean that the procedures many of these so called sovereigns are trying to use in the public are meant for private processes or procedures...just because some yahoo saw some shit on the internet about being sovereign doesn't automatically make them smart...LOL.
If you drive a car you have to possess a license to do so, or are you prepared to have millions of people jump behind the wheel with no demonstration of driving skills or knowledge of traffic laws? That sound like what you want?
@Blahblobify Since drive is a term of commerce and I do not use my car for commerce then I do not wish to drive. I wish to travel in my car without license and I wish to do what ever the fuck I want as long as I do not harm anyone else. That my friend is freedom. We are not a democracy where the majority can take the rights of the minority by vote we are a Republic look that one up. The greatest enemy to freedom is a dumbed down public. See what Franklin said about ignorant and free. Good luck.
The people that hit you with no insurance could not have possibly been true sovereigns, because as such they would have had protection in place to protect the public in the event an accident happened...like as a sovereign it would have been in the form of a surety bond...not Progressive insurance, but it works the same way...they hit you, you tell them what the damage was and it's paid by the surety bond...end of story.
@jazzyrick YES! Finally someone with common sense. Anyone can get a bond through an insurance company. It is so much cheaper than car insuance and protects you even when outside the car, 24 hours a day. People are ignorant of these matters because if the truth were known, NO ONE! would have car insurance! That would put a few useless eaters on the streets.Word to the wise. Never believe an insurance agent because they are too dumb. A few hours study exposes most of their scams.
@SuperNewf1 I wouldn't be so mean as to call insurance agents or bankers dumb. Nearly everyone has just never been taught these things. Ignorance is NOT stupidity. In fact we've all be taught other things...thus you have people like Blahblobify who will vehemently tell us we are wrong...simply because they were taught something different than the truth.
Here's a pop quiz for you Blah...who controls the education system? Who would benefit from ignorance of such matters like court or insurance?
It's funny that the public is ramming the "sovereigns are evil" down our throats because some wacko sovereign killed people. That is as valid as saying I'm an a-hole because I'm a Methodist and some other Methodist acted like an a-hole a couple years ago.
The stuff you believe because it's on TV...or some lawyer told you...or it's on the internet...is laughable. Have you ever looked any of these definitions of "driving" or "registration" in actual government publications?
@numbersview you sound like sheltered little bitch! I bet you deal with polite small town people. YES!!! YES INDEED!!! I AM TERRIFIED OF OTHER HUMAN BEINGS!!!! I lived in the Ghettos of Philadelphia, PA and Houston, TX you come to my side of town bro and tell me you aren't afraid of humans you'll get shot in your fucking head! humans do horrible violent things and arbor massive amounts of stupidity which in turn causes very large amounts of problems....that is why we have laws to govern them ;)
Yes, Humans are not to be trusted, unless they show themselves as trustworthy, and responsible.
Much of what you witness is misguided souls lashing out in rage against the machine, yet they take their overt aggressions out inappropriately on each other, due to fear. They are just unenlightened. Ingrained Fear, perpetuated through our culture over many years
The real cunning psychopaths you need to fear most are those that enslave us, for unknowingly enslaved people == more $
@numbersview telling me I'm scared of humans like it is a bad thing... you're a fucking DOLT! have you ever seen a shooting? have you ever been robbed? can you hear gun shots outside your window with police sirens? have you ever been rolled on? you gonna act like humans are not something to be feared. bullshit! you're fucking moronic idiot!
@numbersview I'd like to see you bring your FEARLESS ass over to 28th and master in northwest philly or 5th Ward Houston TX. you will know what fear is. you'll fucking shit your pants
@hermanington so uh, ive given you a couple days now, are you ok? have you calmed down? you have proceeded to call me names already and have made various assumptions. im just not scared of the human race, i already understand its not laws that make things safe, its still... up to us. also id like to add that insurance causes more accidents if anything, its a buffer zone to let you fuck up, is it not? imagine actually being responsible instead. have a nice weekend.
@numbersview I am assuming. I can not see how you can be fearless of human beings and not be sheltered in a small town away from most of the carnage. the law has come to my aid in many dire situations from getting robbed and getting stabbed to death so I see humans as mad men. I am not simply afraid of every human being but where I am the general public is something to be aware of and quite often to be feared.
@hermanington I am not afraid of the human race as a whole but I do keep my wits about me and I do appreciate most laws and police officers that have been placed there to protect me.
that's why they were initially known as Peace Officers; "To *Serve* and Protect the Public" i.e, to KeepThePeace! .. not to be some Renegade Militarized Officer-of-the-Corp sent out to harass and hunt down Sovereign Citizens for execising their freedoms and liberties as they like, ALL FOR CORP PROFIT, with QUOTAS to be met!
BTW -- Every Sovereign has the ability to become a Peace Officer on a moments notice, and even Arrest rogue Officers-of-the-Corp, and their Superiors
Per the words posted in the video over the last minute: It is good you are conveying a message of peace, something I as a libertarian often struggle with when thinking or dealing with police. However, I think it would be wise to point out that many police would become dicks and law enforcers if given the chance -- that is, if they see you as weak, or if you don't show enough documents as "awkword519" did.
It takes courage to stand up...thanks for posting this video. it is very sad that so many here don't know that they don't know... yet you 'unknowing' pass judgment and name call to defend your own enslavement. So very unfortunate. So much fear and ignorance.
with responsibility comes responsibility to self then others yes ? so in his ultimate first choice, of every choice, he has said he is making, how has he accepted this true responsibility ?
Plus 1 like. But it is still a good idea to buy insurance for your AUTOMOBILE(California definition), just in case some moron runs into you thinking of just how rich they'll get by during you.
I see that some of you are confused . In one breath, you say that he needs to follow the laws of this society, and if he doesnt like it he can go. However he IS following the laws of THIS Society. You people who dont see this truth are frightened, or brainwashed, or both. he is an educated hero. and he has the video to prove it. It is you uneducated zeroes that allow our rights to diminish and be slowly removed. You are the SHEEPLE. and I cannot wait for you all to be herded away.
hes just another attention seeker, the potentiality of putting free for ever plate may leads to free for ever out of this earth when you get accident, and i cant also believe he had no licence and insurance.
LOL yes "Holy Shit...Blacks's Law dictionary gives a definition of "Driver" as a chauffuer, coachman, trucker, getting paid, so fuck that means I'm not driving when I get behind the wheel".
So that means Blacks's law definition overirides all meanings of "driving a fucking vehicle".
@Blahblobify You reveal your intelligence through the language you use. You are not an intelligent person at all and you don't understand the history of our courts and how the insurance system brought about this scam of driving and travelling. It is ignorant people like you that make it work and courageous people like the guy on the video that will change things. If you are so right please explain why the guy was released and not arrested.
this sovereign BS has to be stopped. You live in the society - obey the rules of this society and if u don't want to - go find yourself another country or a planet and live there. But noooo - so called sovereigns wanna have all the benefits of living in america while contributing nothing.
And what happens in the end - google "West Memphis Shooting Arkansas Tennessee".
Please stop contributing to the detriment of OUR larger Sovereign Society via enabling Corps to pillage OUR birth-right granted natural resources and allowing them to poison US--all for a profit, through your ignorant, wasteful, wanton rat-race to the bottom. SO please stop
If you don't like your unalienable rights, then you're more than welcome to leave -- don't let the door hit you in the a** on your way out ...toodle-lu
Notice how its only the brainwashed sheep that think freemen are trying to cause civil disobedience? We as human beings do not need to be ruled by corporate law, we go by common law as this is real law, not statutes maade by corporations to control and make profit from us.
The sooner you sheep wake up and realise this the sooner the world will be a better place to live.
I don't understand how you can make the legal claim that you weren't driving. (I'm not disputing that claim, I just don't understand. Isn't operating a motor vehicle the same as driving? Please forgive my ignorance -- I love what you guys do, but I would just like to understand it better, maybe even do it myself!
This is a fascinating video, and I applaud your efforts, but it leaves me with many questions:
I was recently pulled over, and I didn't have my driver's license on me. I was issued a citation, and given a very hefty fine, which I paid because if I didn't, they would have issued a warrant for my arrest, and I didn't want that.
I'm happy that they didn't issue you a similar citation, but I have absolutely no idea why they didn't! Can you please let me know why?
I'm asking because I don't know and I'm curious: How do sovereign citizens feel about the Constitution and Declaration of Independence? I'm not looking for an argument, just an honest answer.
This has been flagged as spam show
As an aside, I just realized something; (IINM) If I'm Not Mistaken; i didn't apply for a SS card (SSN in the US, a SIN in Canada; others(?)) until i was a teenager ...hrmm
I wonder if the Birth "Certificate" is the Trust account setup for the "Legal Fiction Corp" aka; JOHN DOE , but it's not "activated" until one receives a SSN/SIN ... (ergo, transfer of PowerOfAttorney possibly?)
..but i do NOT doubt my BIRTH itself (the Trust) is being held as collateral, and being traded upon daily.
Love
enoufsaid 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do yourselves a favor and visit sites such as nakedcapitalism[dot]com and learn about how Big Finance really works, and how YOU are being robbed/raped/enslaved to Global International Corps, which you defend so viahemently; Personally, i believe the world would be a MUCH better place if even just the Fortune500 vanished off the planet.
You defend the very same people that have boxes of condoms they use on you, on a daily basis. I hope you're happy, but you certainly aren't Truthful/Honest
Love
enoufsaid 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
...
.. Here, swallow some Truth
rt[dot]com/programs/keiser-report/episode-242-keiser-report/
and perhaps learn something.
(ignore the possible de-sync of audio/video that occurs a few minutes into it -- just listen)
Love
enoufsaid 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BTW folks
I am so sick and tired of hearing all you Non-Sovereign whiners cry about Taxes, and how you think Sovereigns want to freeload -- the EXACT OPPOSITE is the truth ; and we know that your unfounded attacks are derived from said truth, in order to foster psyop attacks. It's where your disinformation and propoganda come from.
If there are some sincere misguided people who really think Statute-Imposed *Taxes*, and IRS Fed Income Tax upon sovereigns will un-Bankrupt a Nation(s) ..more..
Love
enoufsaid 1 day ago
I'm only 17 and this pisses me right the fuck off. What are they doing you want to not pay taxes be a Canadian. Live some where else how about the poorest pars of Africa not very many rules there. And then we can bring the grateful people back to canada. Soldiers have died for this group to try and ruin the government, you wake every morning safe and health because of health care. If you don't like being a canadian citizen that supports our government then there a million people who would love
Frankthetanka5 1 day ago
@Frankthetanka5 Another poor ignorant soul...you Canadiens and us Americans TOOK this land remember...your ancestors didn't come from Canada...and if they did you are already sovereign and just don't have a clue. Why do you care so much about "the government"...how about the fucking people? Don't the people have rights?
jazzyrick 19 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jazzyrick
careful .. i hear (through your words) you allowing the frustration to claim your heart.. it is difficult, i know
Love
p.s. *Someone* marked atleast one of your recent comments as SPAM ; i tried to click the "Not Spam" button (didn't seem to have any affect) -- Hopefully the Channel-Op can remedy the situation, eh "awkword519"? ; thanks
Love
enoufsaid 15 hours ago
You have the right to travel......it's called the bus. If you hurt someone your insurance is there to cover the medical bills of your victim. Every action you make in life effects someone in some way.
dwyer4000 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dwyer4000
"Every action you make in life effects someone in some way"
well spoken truth
Love
p,s, spell-checking self from last post; "fraudulent" which BTW, is one of the 3 main things Sovereigns (and All People) would be UNLAWFUL, if practiced. The other 2? Never cause Harm, Never Breach the Peace
Love
enoufsaid 1 day ago
Homemade plates, no insurance, no license, doesn't pay income tax all equates to - fucktards that end up in jail. Save yourself a lot of grief, don't buy into this bullshit!
exv152 1 day ago
@exv152
it's not that simple, son - and you are wrong in your premise anyways; Sovereigns do NOT abdicate Responsibilty for their actions -- quite the opposite.
Paying a for-profit Corporation with one's *hard earned* cash
(yes, hard-earned, not paper-shuffling, high-frequency algorithmic trading, foreign currency rehypothecation, blatant *fraudelent* MBS, CDOs, CDSs nonsense) for ones own actions *is* abdicating Responsibility -- something most every non-Sovereign seems quite cozy with.
Love
enoufsaid 1 day ago
@enoufsaid I know nothing of maritime law, I never use it. Being responsible for contracts worth 5 to 7 figure sums, I need to know a bit; just like the Highway Act, as I DRIVE. Free people working hard? Some spend their lives on their ass writing 3 replies at a time to people on youtube O.o; debate this with anyone who has ever been a slave. As for the republic, US law like most western law is passed through a democratically elected house, therefore it is inherently democratic.
wierdwesterner 16 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wierdwesterner
bingo; look up UCC-1, and learn about Admiralty/Marirtime Law (the law of the high seas) ..note the COMMERCial Code nature written in the UCC.
and um, no, you seem to be a honor student drop-out, yet somehow managed to earn a Law Society degree ; Constitutional Law you appear also to be extremely lacking in -- I AM NO Lawyer, nor am i attacking you, Please understand, your comments seem to only make sense in How you are able to Game-The-Corrupt-System
Love
enoufsaid 15 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wierdwesterner .. "US law like most western law is passed through a democratically elected house ....."
you MUST be joking; and No - the US is a "Constiutional Republic", well, it's supposed to be. Look up MobRules Democracy v. Republic.
Love
enoufsaid 15 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
... The Declaration of Independence transferred / proclaimed Declared! Sovereignty from the Crown to the Sovereign Citizens of each of the 13 States! The Constitution was created to Seal-into-LAW our unalienable RIGHTS and to establish and limit a fictional-govt-entity, a Corp, through the creation of Wash. D.C. as federalist entity, through which WeThePeople have the LAWFUL and INHERENT right to abolish, as we so choose.
Love
enoufsaid 15 hours ago
@wierdwesterner I would disagree...just because they are "democratically" elected doesn't mean they make choices that are best for the people...especially with the 12 billion+ a year spent on lobbying(that's just the legal stuff). Maybe 150 years ago the elected officials had some sense of responsibility towards the people. Now it's strictly towards the corporations...giving us the choice of electing the guy given millions by Monsanto and the guy given millions by Citi Bank is hardly democratic.
jazzyrick 14 hours ago
@enoufsaid Oh, and in case you don't get the message, I'm not interested in any further debate with you.... at least jazzyrick seemed like a sober nutter.
wierdwesterner 16 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wierdwesterner
I accept your proclamation of delusion
Love
enoufsaid 15 hours ago
@MickScarborough
Yes, LEGALLY *and* LAWFULLY, the Officers-of-the-Corp MUST *always* provide 3 pieces of ID!
a) their Badge and Nameplate
b) Business Card
c) (i forget atm, heh)
Why? Because, they are luring one to engage in Contract with them. *They* (not sovereign citizens) are *Legally Liable* and bound to their own Acts/Statutes/rules/regs/ordinances.
If they do NOT submit 3 pieces of ID, they are NOT to be trusted to be acting as a LAWFULLY sworn in peace officer.
Love
enoufsaid 2 days ago
@MickScarborough
..um, no;
Every Public Place/Thing is Owned by WeThePeople. The Government only exists due to WeThePeople -- and in order for agents of the gov to LAWFULLY operate and enforce LAW, they must first Pledge an Oath to uphold the Constitution, 1st and foremost -- every Statute/Regulation is nothing more than rules bound to Legal Fictions under which THEY, the agents, must operate and abide by, NOT Sovereign Citizens that are not wearing their 'legal fiction cloak'.
Love
enoufsaid 2 days ago
@awkword519
He can't and won't. Many commentors that are non-Free-thinkers, Pro-Police-State are (possibly paid) provocateurs/agents of the State.
For all others that ever read this;
Act always in a respectful, non-disrespecting manner, lest your honor get lost-to-the-wind. These provocateurs are even beyond name-calling foul mouth ignoramuses, so their comments and strawmen args shouldn't even illicit a reply (though, i was suckered into it too atleast once, heh), once any ad-hominem is made
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@mapache11
If you think Driving (or even being a passenger) is too dangerous an activity then don't engage in it, period.
Why is it so hard for you expansionists-at-all-costs to realize that the best (cleanest, safest, self-sustaining) economies are the Local Economies. Why does everyone drive so friggin much? Will the Economy Implode if we don't?! um.. look around, it's imploding anyways, thanks to your short-sighted, nonfree-thinking cage with which you've allowed your mind to be enslaved.
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@enoufsaid for someone with the YT name enoufsaid, you sure yap a lot. People are licensed to drive motor vehicles for the same reason they are licensed to fly planes, of ANY SIZE and not licensed to ride a bicycle. People with a reasonable amount of grey matter understand that having to take a test to prove your ability to operate a machine that can kill and injure others, is a necessity. Fuckwit.
mapache11 2 days ago
@mapache11 You're assuming that everyone with a "drivers license" is competent to drive? Have you ever been on a public street in your life? Do you truly think this is true?
jazzyrick 2 days ago
@jazzyrick No I'm not assuming that. I am stating a fact. You assume that the streets would be the same without licencing and testing. ROFLMFAO. Have a look at the drivers in any Third World country..where people regularly drive without any testing.
Fuckstick.
mapache11 1 day ago
@mapache11 The name calling really gives your assertion SO MUCH MORE credibility that I should just give up now...LOL...
A fact? Really? So you've driven in a country with no testing or speed limits? And if you have you were probably the one who felt like a fish out of water since you weren't used to driving in such conditions.
jazzyrick 1 day ago
@jazzyrick Your argument isn't incorrect BECAUSE you are a fuckwit, it is wrong AND you are a fuckwit. There's a difference.
A simple google search of "driving in the thrid world" will provide you with ample evidence that a lack of driving education makes the roads less safe. But common sense should aready have told you that much.
mapache11 1 day ago
@mapache11 You are a funny person...not very creative but funny.
Common sense would also tell you that using such creative language as "fuckwit" is a sure sign of intelligence.
Notice how you didn't directly answer my question...
Since you've obviously done extensive research on third world driving could you point me to a reliable source for that kind of information?
jazzyrick 1 day ago
@jazzyrick Even someone with as limited an intellectual capacity as you, can use a search engine like Google. Or even try YT. Maybe type "Driving in Cairo". Don't be so lazy.
mapache11 1 day ago
@mapache11
Q. how did the "streets" get that way? Where decency and yielding right-of-way to your fellow sovereign made you 'take (time, as valuable as your own) from your brother/sister?
Where do you think that GREEDY right come from?
Love
enoufsaid 1 day ago
@enoufsaid How did the streets get what way? Teh way they are in the first world, or the way they are in the third world?
Only an imbecile would believe that NOT having to pass any tests will make the streets safer.
mapache11 1 day ago
@mapache11 and I'm assuming with such strong assertions that you would have proof of that...
jazzyrick 1 day ago
@jazzyrick proof of what? That the streets are safer in London, Tokyo or New York than in Cairo, Bangkok or Mexico City?
mapache11 1 day ago
@mapache11 You tell me...you are the one making assertions...not me...If you can find where I said any streets would be safer anywhere for any reason I'll gladly eat my words...
jazzyrick 1 day ago
@mapache11 Only an imbecile would make such a statement without presenting any proof...
You can argue common sense all you want, but it was once common sense that the world was flat too...keep 'em coming...
jazzyrick 1 day ago
@jazzyrick You believe that nobody needs to drive at the posted speed limits. This is exactly what it is like in the less developed world. I said that it is safer driving in the developed world, where people are required to pass tests to ensure that they know traffic laws and how to safely operate motor vehicles.
It was never "common sense' that the earth was flat. It was what some uneducated people believed, but that no sailor who had been more than 30 miles from shore did.
mapache11 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mapache11 I've never said "nobody needs to drive posted speed limits" either...you are putting words in my mouth. Again...show me where I said that and I'll eat my words.
I simply asked you a few questions...so again...
You said "Only an imbecile would believe that NOT having to pass any tests will make the streets safer." yet you have presented zero proof.
Present your proof if you make a claim please.
jazzyrick 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mapache11
I see you are ready to hear this;
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety"--Ben Franklin
Do you really believe the world (1st world and 3rd/5th world nations alike) is becoming a Safer place?
Love
enoufsaid 1 day ago
@crackahcrackah
Indeed; having license+insurance+registration enables the richest snobby brats to behave maliciously and callously -- being disrespectful, dishonorable, unkind without justice! Not to mention the new car their daddy buys them once they smash up their toy. They are nothing more than State-Licensed road-raging lunatics acting in a Legal Fictional capacity withOUT having to pay the consequences for their misdeeds and disrespect they bestow upon our fellow brothers/sisters.
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@mapache11
Ohh .. in your incessant rantings and maniacal outbursts you didn't clearly state your case;
Are you asking-> What's to keep everyone from buying their own plane and operating it *privately and not-in-commerce* without being licensed? If so, then;
Sure -- it's about Risk and Liability -- with Sovereignty comes MUCH, if not ALL Responsibility -- I see no reason why one cannot operate their own plane LAWFULLY...but yes, they will be completely accountable for their actions...
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
...I know this scares the crap out of you, and many others and that's ok, but.. it's the LAW. (ergo, Sane/Rational people will NOT attempt to engage in this behaviour, atleast not without Proper Training, and Liability Insurance).
If you don't like it, you are free to leave (Hence another beautiful concept embodied in our Constitution via the Founders).
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
...Remember, a motor vehicle can be used as a weapon, just like a plane can (Yes condeleeza, you filthy lying pond scum)...and just like a gun, duh
Responsibility scares the crap out of all you Police-State promoters, we understand that
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@mapache11
apologies, but i cannot overlook this imbecilic post;
When one flies on a COMMERCIAL passenger jet, they are IN CONTRACT with the Corp with whom they purchased their ticket. That contract states that a Professional Licensed Pilot shall be flying the plane.
So, not only are you being short-sighted and ignorant in your erroneous attempt at an analogy, but you fail to distinguish between;
a) Public v Private
b) Contract / No Contract
c) Consent / No Consent
d) Du jour / De facto
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@enoufsaid
Oh .. hehe.. and NO!
Flying on a commercial airliner as a PASSENGER is just that -- as A PASSENGER! ergo, not operating, nor driving, nor flying!
duh
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@xEviLxGeniuSx666x
haha, right on -- not to mention discoboy there doesn't even realize that WE are keeping HIM and the Officers-of-the-Corp safe, and enabling them to have the Privilege to be Paid/Compensated for functioning as a *Peace Officer* (Unfortunately, almost all only operate in their Officer-of-the-Corp enforcement capacity only). What a shame
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@gintherlover
Shame, heh -- but yep, it's all Unlawful 'color of law' crap -- Welcome to our Police State ;-)
That said; it;s stated clearly on BOTH your SSN/SIN card and Birth Certificate that they are NOT to be used for ID purposes; WE make the mistake of using these as such; The ONLY Document one needs to PROVE who they are is their "Live Birth Record" (not Birth Cert., but an actual Stamped Copy via State Auth (Sec of State, or HHS, or Vital Statistics, i forget) "Live Birth Record")
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@enoufsaid
...and this carries over to my earlier comment about the Co-Existance of *Man* and *Man w/Legal Fiction Jacket* -- so it's OK to 'Register' *if* you desire to enjoy whatever Benefits and Privileges said registration may provide for you (Note; You are then subjected to follow all the Rules/Acts/Statutes/Regs)
[..more..]
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@enoufsaid
...then it's all just a matter of "Which *capacity* was one operating under at that time" whenever a complaint is made. I can see there being millions of Falsified/Erroneous complaints made daily at first, yep. Not to mention any Hardship/Harassment/Assault/Battery/Illegal Detention endured, heh
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@enoufsaid
Apologies; I meant Unlawful Detention, not Illegal (as Legal/Illegality does NOT APPLY in this context--i.e., when we are NOT wearing our 'legal fiction coats'), and we need to vigilant in making a Clear and Concise distinction each and every time.
I cannot stress this enough-and this will really turn the tables on these Robber Barons. [..more]
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
f we so choose to operate wearing our LEGAL FICTION JACKET, then not only are we acting Employees/Trustees of said Corp. we registered/licensed/contracted with, but . We Ought to be Paid (Compensated).
And as Agents of the State; the Corps that WE LICENSE -- that extract OUR natural resources (Mountain Top Removal / DeForestation, Coal, Oil, Gas, Strip mining, Ore mining, etc) ought to be sending us weekly/monthly/quarterly Dividends for the PRIVILEGES we Provide to them.
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@enoufsaid
Oh yeah, and We do NOT OWN our Drivers Licenses, nor our SSN/SIN cards. (as i'm sure you're aware). Just pointing it out to others possibly reading along.
Look at / Read the back of each of those aforementioned cards
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@MidnightWins2
why make that distinction?
You have shown through your many many posts that you clearly and intentionally try to avoid making any clear and concise distinctions between operating in PUBLIC COMMERCE, and NOT or as an Agent of the State, or NOT
--- Same holds true for your intentional dismissal of Legal Definitions (Blacks / Bouvier Law Dicts)
--- Same holds true for inability to distinguish between Travel and Drive.
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@enoufsaid
Oh yeah.. and "America" is one of two possible (or both) of 7 Continents -- sorry to have made that distinction, heh
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@gintherlover
At this point in time, i actually believe there might be some middle-ground usages here, where BOTH systems can exist--"equally and separately" based off the premise of: "Which *capacity* was one operating under" at the time of Offense/Complaint.
IOW, We should be able to wear our 'legal fiction coat' whenever we decide to engage in Public Commerce, (and when we are, we are legally bound to all the Acts/Statutes/Regs) however, most times we are NOT wearing this Fictional Wrapper.
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@gintherlover
Curious, had she already had her fee-schedule filed and properly set-up, and did she Notify the officers-of-the-corp. that by pulling her over and detaining her that not only was that Activating her FS (of which she should have a Copy of handy, and had presented to each of them) but they were *each* to be subjected to Civil Suits for Harrassment.
Did she immediately say No Consent/Contract? and "I am convening a Court of Public Record" from the outset? (and recorded it?)
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@MidnightWins2
Ofourse; the whole system is basically Corrupt - thanks for that affirmation. Thing is, what do you intend to do about it now that you affirm it? (other than whine and portray how much of a coward you really are and that most Freemen posting here are courageous enough to stand up for themselves, their families, and yes -- their fellow brothers/sisters, such as yourself, whom seems semi-knowledgeable, but even the ignorant).
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@gintherlover
Note: US Reconstruction Act of 1868 - 14th Amendment which created a defacto US Citizenship (the D.C. United States Federal Corp), ..as opposed to *State Citizen*, which every non-colored was prior, and as such, enjoyed Natural/Common Law Rights.
Note;
1913 Jekyll Island offspring (FRS+IRS+Fed Income Tax).
-- The killer blow was the 1933 Emergency Banking Act which basically suspended US Dec-of-Indep/Constitution when the US admitted BANKRUPTCY to International Banking Cartel
enoufsaid 3 days ago
Also note;
US Census Bureau, asking "Are you a US Citizen" and most unsuspecting State Citizens over the years doing this -> *[x]* as affirming they are now turning over their Rights as Sovereign State Citizenship --> US Fed Corp employee/trustee status (D.C, Corp.). Trickery and Deception (and even moreso today --> Confusion) These are the tools of Satan
This 10 part series from circa *1995* explains it;
watch?v=hK4cEoE7mCM
"John David Van Hove aka Johnny Liberty part 1 of 10"
Love
enoufsaid 3 days ago
@enoufsaid
I need to correct myself there;
The population of people that lived in the ~60 sq. miles known as Washington D.C. were already *US Citizens* prior to 1868, not State Citizens, which is also why they couldn't Vote. They are/were already considered Corporation employees, and as such, were required to obey all the Acts/Statutes enacted. They were/are *legally* bound, as we all are, it seems, which is a Farce and a Presumption from TPTB only. However, WeThePeople need to let them know.
enoufsaid 3 days ago
your breaking the law plain and simple. No one said you had absolute freedom ever.
HeroOfYourMisery 4 days ago
@HeroOfYourMisery Who has a say over YOUR liberty?
Kundry 3 days ago
@MidnightWins2 That judges are or are not willing to recognize as a right is no more relevant than King George's willingness or unwillingness to recognize rights. Neither judges nor kings nor presidents are the source of our rights. The armed people, willing to shed the blood of patriots and tyrants at the altar of liberty, are the source and guarantor of all rights.
Kundry 4 days ago
@Kundry Okay, so where are the armed people ready to enforce your rights on the matter of driving without a license? It looks to me like the vast majority of people support requiring drivers to be licensed.
MidnightWins2 4 days ago
@MidnightWins2 I guess you don't follow the news very much. Check out the Youtube video titled Sovereign Citizens and Law Enforcement.
Kundry 3 days ago
@Kundry Yeah, two nuts killed a couple of cops over a traffic stop. And then the police tracked them down and put a hundred bullets in them. So when do the rights get enforced, then?
MidnightWins2 3 days ago
@MidnightWins2 Rights get recognized or suppressed when either patriots or tyrants tire of dying for their recognition or suppression. Thomas Jefferson never claimed that the tree of liberty only demanded a little blood to flourish. Liberty needs regular nourishment.
Kundry 3 days ago
@MidnightWins2 Do they really support is or is it "just the way things are"? I don't think anyone would argue that we would hope someone would be proficient in driving before taking to the public roads, but there are many people with "drivers licenses" out there that have to reason doing so. There are millions of bad drivers out there...just because they have a "license" doesn't make them a good driver...it's a friggen piece of paper...
jazzyrick 3 days ago
@jazzyrick Yes, the system does need some major reforming. It certainly does not need outright abolishing, though.
MidnightWins2 3 days ago
I am going to do this soon.
SuperNewf1 6 days ago
@SuperNewf1
Yes drive without a license, enjoy the fines and time in court trying to avoid going to jail
Blahblobify 6 days ago
@Blahblobify No sir. I am being tortured in my own home in Canada. Crippled, in pain, and if I walk or stand too long I will get blood clots in my leg. I cannot take care of daily functions such as grocery shopping, banking, post office, lawyer, government agencies, or anywhere else. I was run over by a train caused by negligence of the railway. I will not be forced to be isolated in my little apartment with no Sun, no fresh air, and hungry.MY RIGHT TO TRAVEL WILL NOT BE IMPEDED BY GOVERNMENT!
SuperNewf1 5 days ago
@SuperNewf1
You were run over by A TRAIN?
And it was their fault?
Oh please tell us more. I've lived around train tracks all my life and I can't imagine getting run over by a train and it being the fault of the train.
Unless i was retarded.
Blahblobify 5 days ago
@Blahblobify Yeah you are an idiot. I was 24 years old, coming home from my job as crane operator for Algoma Centtral Railway in Northern Ontario, with at least 42 crew members, all our gear, and personal belogngs. Train derailed, threw me right onto the track head first at about 40 mils an hour, and then smacked into my back and dragged me, then the second car severely crushed my ankle. Since then the government has tried to murder me by neglecting my injuries and taking my rights. Eugenics.
SuperNewf1 5 days ago
@SuperNewf1
Oh bullshit.
OK nutsie....if the government tried to murder you and failed, then your government is run by morons.
Fuck I could kill you tomorrow if i wanted to.
Liar.
Blahblobify 5 days ago
@SuperNewf1
oh snap! you just HAD to add that last sentence!? didn't ya!
You had 'em going right along until then .. aww shucks :-)
Would've like to see him argue against it, hehe
Oh well - thanks for the premature-climax :-P
Love
enoufsaid 2 days ago
Good show of respect all around, but if someone waves all the benefits and services of the State shouldn't they find their own road to travel on? These ones are owned and regulated by the State and tax payers are allowed to travel on them under license and registration?
marcusorilius 1 week ago
@marcusorilius Humans own the road not the state which is actually a corporation., A human being is free to contract or not contract, a citizen has to follow the corporation's rules [state] It' complicated because it the system, is set up to be so, robbing us of what is rightfully our birthright. Remember you own a portion of the commonwealth which is the whole Earth.
MrBiejos 1 week ago
@MrBiejos Yeah, because roads totally weren't built from tax dollars.
MidnightWins2 1 week ago
@MidnightWins2 Again you do not have it exactly right and are just stating propaganda. Income tax pays only the interest on the debt the corporation [gov] owes to the people, it is the government's debt not the peoples's debt.
.
MrBiejos 1 week ago 2
@MidnightWins2 Yes I know what you mean... How ever one can easily argue that buddy does pay tax you think his car is running on peace love and happiness? You do realize in Canada a massive chunk of the price of gas is tax, right?
Quit supporting the government when it is obviously corrupt and thieving.
aluckyshot 1 week ago
@aluckyshot I'm not "supporting" the government. I just object to people who spread misinformation about what they can legally do. If you "travel" on the road with a vehicle without a license or registration, and the government catches you, armed men will come for you, take you away, and put you in a cage. That is the reality. If you want to change that, that's fine, but there is no point in pretending that it doesn't already happen.
MidnightWins2 1 week ago
@MidnightWins2 I'm afraid you are the one who is misinformed. I've said it before here, but do you understand what a "driver" is by legal definition...not what you use in everyday language. You do realize there is a difference right? Haven't we gone over this before? Isn't it YOU spreading misinformation?
jazzyrick 6 days ago
@marcusorilius Once again...gas taxes should pay for roads...if you have to buy gas then you pay for the roads...simple as that.
jazzyrick 6 days ago
@marcusorilius The roads are owned by the people not the State. If you do a Dun& Bradstreet search you will find the "State" is a corporation. When a government engages in commerce they lay down their sovereignty and become like any other corporation see Clearfield Doctrine. A license is permission to engage in commerce all DL's are licenses to operate a business. A driver is someone that is being paid to operate a motor vehicle. Why do you think the people are mad its not freedom it's slavery.
whitefly2 5 days ago
That was really good. Fantastic video.
Respect to the savvy cop. Its not everyday you find one with brains.
Trouble is too often, they will just beat on you and call it resisting, then once you are in their clutches its hard to get out.
All these people out there with cameras are changing things though.
gabaunion 1 week ago
AWESOME!!!!!
phiaman 1 week ago
you choose not to pay taxes, better get a 4wd as taxes pay for the road, you moron
Huey7703 1 week ago
@Huey7703 Tax lovers are road lovers because this is always their first argument."What about the roads man" At present roads are supposed to be paid for with the gas tax. Half or more of your income is taxed that's more than a serf in old England. Enjoy your roads.
whitefly2 1 week ago
@Huey7703 Agreed...isn't that what gas taxes are for? It's called a use tax. If you don't use it why should you have to pay for it? You are assuming that INCOME TAX goes to pay for roads.
jazzyrick 6 days ago
STRAIGHTJACKET FOR JAZZYRICK PLEASE
wierdwesterner 2 weeks ago
I was part of the Freeman society and a "sovereign" after my friend told me about it. What he FAILED to mention is that this group is actually a secret society of HOMOSEXUALS. They make up all these fake laws as a hobby because they couldn't become cops or lawyers (they're alldeadbeats) but really their agenda is male buttsex. WARN YOUR FRIENDS. IM SERIOUS!!!!
aj4450165 2 weeks ago
@aj4450165 your mind is truly deranged. you are far from knowing anything about freemasons. secret buttsex agenda? really? why? there could be no world with out laws it would be devoid of order and peace with chaos reigning as an ultimate force.
hermanington 1 week ago
@hermanington There is a thing called the common law for Americans in 49 states that is the law of the people. What you call a law is nothing more than the corporate rules for their employees. The problem is the judges don't obey the(common) law and the juries are stupid and they think like you that the statutes apply to everyone.
whitefly2 1 week ago
@whitefly2 It would take you five seconds to look up "common law" and realize that is nothing like that.
MidnightWins2 1 week ago
@MidnightWins2 Every state has a clause like this" 2.01 Common law and certain statutes declared in force" This is in Florida Statutes where I live. It is the first thing after the definitions. When they say Law of The Land this is what they mean. The Common law is in effect everywhere except the territories and or all land owned by The United States of America. This land is called The United States this is what Obama is president of. It didn't even take five seconds to prove you wrong.
whitefly2 1 week ago
@whitefly2 I think Louisana is based on civil law or Roman law...unlike the other 49 states.
jazzyrick 6 days ago
@jazzyrick Louisiana is based upon the Napoleonic code or French law.
whitefly2 6 days ago
@jazzyrick Look at the symbols. Colorado too displays the fascii. We are all governed by Rome, with the Pope being the Emperor, while their Jewish partners in banking run the scams that make them rich, and the U.S. supplies the military might to gain control of dissenting countries. The Roman emporers never died, they became Popes. Constantine and the Jews knew creating a religion to capture the hearts and minds of the flock would invade all countries and make them submit to Roman/Jewish rule.
SuperNewf1 5 days ago
@MidnightWins2 And you have looked up "common law"?
jazzyrick 6 days ago
@whitefly2
LOL yeah all those pesky "statutes" don't apply to anyone unless they agree to them, tell that to the judge next time you get hauled into court.
Blahblobify 6 days ago
@Blahblobify You will be surprised what the Judge does. Most of our problems stem from our ignorance of procedure and law. When we take a benefit privilege and declare ourselves to be US citizens then we become engaged in a contract where we lay down our sovereignty and operate in the capacity of a person. It is the jury we need to educate so that the"King" can not just throw us in jail because we violate his wishes. But some of what you say is true but for different reasons mostly our ignorance
whitefly2 5 days ago
@whitefly2
I don't have a clue as to what you are talking about.
Neither do you.
Blahblobify 5 days ago
@Blahblobify Your capacity to understand is your issue not mine. Some reading of case law and history is necessary. Perhaps a video game will be produced that will enable you to gain an understanding of status issues and contract law. It may be your only hope.
whitefly2 5 days ago
@whitefly2
I understand comkpletely. you want to drive a car without a license and do whatever the fuck you want.
You can't.
Blahblobify 5 days ago
@Blahblobify Let me ask you this Blah...do you know what the legal definition of "driving" is in the US code?
Do you know how money is created? Do you know the difference between PRIVATE and PUBLIC finances? Do you understand what a contract is and how to contract legally?
I, unlike you, do not assume what people know or do not know.
Those who know the least often know it the loudest.
jazzyrick 5 days ago
@jazzyrick
I know that when you are behind the wheel of a car you are driving it. Claiming otherwise is an asshole semantic game.
Blahblobify 5 days ago
@Blahblobify Tell that to the Untied States government...it's in their own code.
Notice the "and used for commercial purposes" part. Do you use your car for commercial purposes?
18 USC Chapter 2 part 31.Look it up yourself
(6) Motor vehicle.— The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
jazzyrick 5 days ago
@jazzyrick That is the federal code. It is state governments that license drivers, and there are no caveats about it only applying to "commercial" driving. Judges have ruled against the "I'm only travelling" or "I refuse to contract" arguments many, many times before.
MidnightWins2 5 days ago
@MidnightWins2 I'm sure they have many times. The understanding of court and how to separate the "private" right to travel and the "public" statutes and understanding how court procedures actually work, not to mention stupid "sovereigns" who "read some stuff on the internet", is certainly the cause for that.
The "sovereign" thing isn't something you just become by saying it. It's a long process of learning who you are, how to deal with the public, and knowing court procedures inside and out.
jazzyrick 5 days ago
@jazzyrick If judges are willing to enforce these "sovereign" rights, then why do they constantly state publicly that they are worthless? I mean, it can't be that they're corrupt. If they were, then they wouldn't enforce these rights at all.
MidnightWins2 5 days ago
@MidnightWins2 No they aren't "corrupt"...well most of them aren't corrupt anyway. They are simply working within the system as it has evolved. If you've noticed from some of my previous posts there is a difference between "private" and "public" court procedures...and as such any "private" decision or case is just that...PRIVATE. Thus won't be in court records as a recognized decision or however you want to view it.
jazzyrick 3 days ago
@MidnightWins2 I also might mean that the procedures many of these so called sovereigns are trying to use in the public are meant for private processes or procedures...just because some yahoo saw some shit on the internet about being sovereign doesn't automatically make them smart...LOL.
jazzyrick 3 days ago
@jazzyrick
So WHAT?
If you drive a car you have to possess a license to do so, or are you prepared to have millions of people jump behind the wheel with no demonstration of driving skills or knowledge of traffic laws? That sound like what you want?
Blahblobify 5 days ago
@Blahblobify Like I said...I actually ask questions...rather than assuming I know everything, because I know enough to know that I don't know shit...
jazzyrick 5 days ago
@Blahblobify Since drive is a term of commerce and I do not use my car for commerce then I do not wish to drive. I wish to travel in my car without license and I wish to do what ever the fuck I want as long as I do not harm anyone else. That my friend is freedom. We are not a democracy where the majority can take the rights of the minority by vote we are a Republic look that one up. The greatest enemy to freedom is a dumbed down public. See what Franklin said about ignorant and free. Good luck.
whitefly2 5 days ago
law cornell edu has the full US Code...and it's easily searchable...knock yourself out...
jazzyrick 2 weeks ago
The people that hit you with no insurance could not have possibly been true sovereigns, because as such they would have had protection in place to protect the public in the event an accident happened...like as a sovereign it would have been in the form of a surety bond...not Progressive insurance, but it works the same way...they hit you, you tell them what the damage was and it's paid by the surety bond...end of story.
jazzyrick 2 weeks ago
@jazzyrick YES! Finally someone with common sense. Anyone can get a bond through an insurance company. It is so much cheaper than car insuance and protects you even when outside the car, 24 hours a day. People are ignorant of these matters because if the truth were known, NO ONE! would have car insurance! That would put a few useless eaters on the streets.Word to the wise. Never believe an insurance agent because they are too dumb. A few hours study exposes most of their scams.
SuperNewf1 5 days ago
@SuperNewf1 I wouldn't be so mean as to call insurance agents or bankers dumb. Nearly everyone has just never been taught these things. Ignorance is NOT stupidity. In fact we've all be taught other things...thus you have people like Blahblobify who will vehemently tell us we are wrong...simply because they were taught something different than the truth.
Here's a pop quiz for you Blah...who controls the education system? Who would benefit from ignorance of such matters like court or insurance?
jazzyrick 5 days ago
It's funny that the public is ramming the "sovereigns are evil" down our throats because some wacko sovereign killed people. That is as valid as saying I'm an a-hole because I'm a Methodist and some other Methodist acted like an a-hole a couple years ago.
The stuff you believe because it's on TV...or some lawyer told you...or it's on the internet...is laughable. Have you ever looked any of these definitions of "driving" or "registration" in actual government publications?
jazzyrick 2 weeks ago
Does this stand in the uk?
ts2ts21 2 weeks ago
don't come to indiana they will arrest you
catseye10000 2 weeks ago
where the fuck does it say anything about not needing papers when TRAVELING in a motor vehicle that you are operating?
or does it just talk about simply traveling with no motor vehicle involved?
can you imagine a world where people don't need a license or insurance? that would be utter madness!!!!!!!!!!
hermanington 3 weeks ago
@hermanington you sound scared of humans.
numbersview 2 weeks ago
@numbersview you sound like sheltered little bitch! I bet you deal with polite small town people. YES!!! YES INDEED!!! I AM TERRIFIED OF OTHER HUMAN BEINGS!!!! I lived in the Ghettos of Philadelphia, PA and Houston, TX you come to my side of town bro and tell me you aren't afraid of humans you'll get shot in your fucking head! humans do horrible violent things and arbor massive amounts of stupidity which in turn causes very large amounts of problems....that is why we have laws to govern them ;)
hermanington 2 weeks ago
@hermanington
Yes, Humans are not to be trusted, unless they show themselves as trustworthy, and responsible.
Much of what you witness is misguided souls lashing out in rage against the machine, yet they take their overt aggressions out inappropriately on each other, due to fear. They are just unenlightened. Ingrained Fear, perpetuated through our culture over many years
The real cunning psychopaths you need to fear most are those that enslave us, for unknowingly enslaved people == more $
Love
enoufsaid 2 days ago
@numbersview telling me I'm scared of humans like it is a bad thing... you're a fucking DOLT! have you ever seen a shooting? have you ever been robbed? can you hear gun shots outside your window with police sirens? have you ever been rolled on? you gonna act like humans are not something to be feared. bullshit! you're fucking moronic idiot!
hermanington 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
hermanington 2 weeks ago
@numbersview I'd like to see you bring your FEARLESS ass over to 28th and master in northwest philly or 5th Ward Houston TX. you will know what fear is. you'll fucking shit your pants
hermanington 2 weeks ago
@numbersview even better come over to diamond and broad and tell there is nothing to fear.
hermanington 2 weeks ago
@hermanington so uh, ive given you a couple days now, are you ok? have you calmed down? you have proceeded to call me names already and have made various assumptions. im just not scared of the human race, i already understand its not laws that make things safe, its still... up to us. also id like to add that insurance causes more accidents if anything, its a buffer zone to let you fuck up, is it not? imagine actually being responsible instead. have a nice weekend.
numbersview 1 week ago
@numbersview I am assuming. I can not see how you can be fearless of human beings and not be sheltered in a small town away from most of the carnage. the law has come to my aid in many dire situations from getting robbed and getting stabbed to death so I see humans as mad men. I am not simply afraid of every human being but where I am the general public is something to be aware of and quite often to be feared.
hermanington 1 week ago
@hermanington I am not afraid of the human race as a whole but I do keep my wits about me and I do appreciate most laws and police officers that have been placed there to protect me.
hermanington 1 week ago
@hermanington
that's why they were initially known as Peace Officers; "To *Serve* and Protect the Public" i.e, to KeepThePeace! .. not to be some Renegade Militarized Officer-of-the-Corp sent out to harass and hunt down Sovereign Citizens for execising their freedoms and liberties as they like, ALL FOR CORP PROFIT, with QUOTAS to be met!
BTW -- Every Sovereign has the ability to become a Peace Officer on a moments notice, and even Arrest rogue Officers-of-the-Corp, and their Superiors
Love
enoufsaid 2 days ago
Per the words posted in the video over the last minute: It is good you are conveying a message of peace, something I as a libertarian often struggle with when thinking or dealing with police. However, I think it would be wise to point out that many police would become dicks and law enforcers if given the chance -- that is, if they see you as weak, or if you don't show enough documents as "awkword519" did.
Thank you for posting.
GreenRiver72 3 weeks ago
It takes courage to stand up...thanks for posting this video. it is very sad that so many here don't know that they don't know... yet you 'unknowing' pass judgment and name call to defend your own enslavement. So very unfortunate. So much fear and ignorance.
llaevigrof 3 weeks ago
with responsibility comes responsibility to self then others yes ? so in his ultimate first choice, of every choice, he has said he is making, how has he accepted this true responsibility ?
rodabe2012 3 weeks ago
I'm a Martian-American and your Earth physics do not apply to me. Watch me fly!
Vicfangio 3 weeks ago
Plus 1 like. But it is still a good idea to buy insurance for your AUTOMOBILE(California definition), just in case some moron runs into you thinking of just how rich they'll get by during you.
hoseqt1 3 weeks ago
@hoseqt1 Even better, I hope he gets T-Boned by some drunk ''no tengo licensia'' having illegal ho flees the scene.
Vicfangio 3 weeks ago
thanks for sharing, your a great man
lynnsbomb 4 weeks ago
think you only need a licence when your transporting goods not personally property
2braindamage 4 weeks ago
@2braindamage The government disagrees.
MidnightWins2 4 weeks ago
I see that some of you are confused . In one breath, you say that he needs to follow the laws of this society, and if he doesnt like it he can go. However he IS following the laws of THIS Society. You people who dont see this truth are frightened, or brainwashed, or both. he is an educated hero. and he has the video to prove it. It is you uneducated zeroes that allow our rights to diminish and be slowly removed. You are the SHEEPLE. and I cannot wait for you all to be herded away.
youareonthetube1 4 weeks ago
These cops were very professional. This is a very interesting situation and complicated.
JORDANSAGESVLOG 1 month ago
hes just another attention seeker, the potentiality of putting free for ever plate may leads to free for ever out of this earth when you get accident, and i cant also believe he had no licence and insurance.
braveGurkhali 1 month ago
@braveGurkhali
LOL yes "Holy Shit...Blacks's Law dictionary gives a definition of "Driver" as a chauffuer, coachman, trucker, getting paid, so fuck that means I'm not driving when I get behind the wheel".
So that means Blacks's law definition overirides all meanings of "driving a fucking vehicle".
Whatta buncha dumbfucks.
Blahblobify 1 month ago
@Blahblobify You reveal your intelligence through the language you use. You are not an intelligent person at all and you don't understand the history of our courts and how the insurance system brought about this scam of driving and travelling. It is ignorant people like you that make it work and courageous people like the guy on the video that will change things. If you are so right please explain why the guy was released and not arrested.
willhelmfred05 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FBI clearly labels "sovereign citizens" movement as domestic terrorists. Google up "FBI sovereign citizens" and "sovereign citizen extremists".
nixd3v 1 month ago
this sovereign BS has to be stopped. You live in the society - obey the rules of this society and if u don't want to - go find yourself another country or a planet and live there. But noooo - so called sovereigns wanna have all the benefits of living in america while contributing nothing.
And what happens in the end - google "West Memphis Shooting Arkansas Tennessee".
nixd3v 1 month ago
@nixd3v
which society? The BAR Society/Association?
I think not
Please stop contributing to the detriment of OUR larger Sovereign Society via enabling Corps to pillage OUR birth-right granted natural resources and allowing them to poison US--all for a profit, through your ignorant, wasteful, wanton rat-race to the bottom. SO please stop
If you don't like your unalienable rights, then you're more than welcome to leave -- don't let the door hit you in the a** on your way out ...toodle-lu
Love
enoufsaid 2 days ago
You got lucky you got nice cops. That usually doesn't happen
triggormcgintey 1 month ago
Can you give me more info on the process of how it works? are you in the U.S
WISEONEXX 1 month ago
FUCK THE POLICE
LOVETROLL69ME 1 month ago
Notice how its only the brainwashed sheep that think freemen are trying to cause civil disobedience? We as human beings do not need to be ruled by corporate law, we go by common law as this is real law, not statutes maade by corporations to control and make profit from us.
The sooner you sheep wake up and realise this the sooner the world will be a better place to live.
gunmanscotland 1 month ago
I don't understand how you can make the legal claim that you weren't driving. (I'm not disputing that claim, I just don't understand. Isn't operating a motor vehicle the same as driving? Please forgive my ignorance -- I love what you guys do, but I would just like to understand it better, maybe even do it myself!
1GodOnlyOne 1 month ago
This is a fascinating video, and I applaud your efforts, but it leaves me with many questions:
I was recently pulled over, and I didn't have my driver's license on me. I was issued a citation, and given a very hefty fine, which I paid because if I didn't, they would have issued a warrant for my arrest, and I didn't want that.
I'm happy that they didn't issue you a similar citation, but I have absolutely no idea why they didn't! Can you please let me know why?
1GodOnlyOne 1 month ago
Do you know if I can do what you did, in my state, which is Texas?
How the heck did you get away with this without getting a ticket, getting towed, or even getting arrested???
God bless you!
=)
1GodOnlyOne 1 month ago
Also, why were you outside your vehicle in the cold? Why didn't you go back in and turn the heater on?
1GodOnlyOne 1 month ago
I'm asking because I don't know and I'm curious: How do sovereign citizens feel about the Constitution and Declaration of Independence? I'm not looking for an argument, just an honest answer.
daveblandston6 1 month ago
@daveblandston6
eh, well i'm pretty sure that's what we're basing our unalienable rights off of, heh
Love
enoufsaid 2 days ago