Great movie, but I wouldn't use it past a 100 level course. There's not a single mention of the names or methods used, not a speck of technical information in there. Just eye candy.
This how they control people and the world- (but they are not going to tell you that) - It's a secret agenda - I think they do this in this building "Western State Property Management" (Why I'm telling you that-bec I can't fight this MAFIA) to keep everybody behaving like nice quit "ZOMBIES" that walking and hypnotize like a puppies!!!!!!!! Under ground secret movements!!!!
To me this give me a headache and ringing in my ears- If this wt t'-wnt to achieve THEN T'-GOT IT!!!!!!
DNA damage by cosmic rays is RANDOM. Most cells die. Body cells do not count. In order for a "TRANSMISSIBLE GENETIC ERROR" to occur the cell must be a SEX CELL. DNA has places where it "prefers" to be "damaged" (maybe by design?). This reduces the randomness. The result is GENETIC EVOLUTION IN FUTURE GENERATIONS. It may indeed be possible for a non-lethal increase in cosmic "background" radiation (CME) to accelerate our evolution. But, any change still won't be "fast". Hive mind is next.
-Think-just Think-What the Russians engineering scientists aka Israelis Mosad-cia-kgb-mafia-Doing to your brain to you thoughts to your mind-They suck (of course with help of a thousands of little helpers around the world-of course-(missionaries))What ever,-with science and frequency and beam they tell you that is for experiments and test!!!- but the truth is they messing with the mind and your life!!!!-to control-all!-I care bec, they are doing it to me and I will not let them -anymore!!!!!!
Let's keep the word God. Source, Universe. If you, personally have an issue with any given word, then don't use it. Religions don't own term God. It does have spiritual meaning. For awhile, when ditching religion, I used the term Universe, but didn't expect everyone else to, since I realized I was dealing with my own psychological issues. Now I've gotten over that, and I freely use the well known, useful term of God.
Hey I lke this information here on positive emotions able to make dna react. There is a clue for scientists to look into. You have to go out of the box the beat the best.
Recent studies show that positive emotion/thought such as love, joy, greatfulness and etc. effects human DNA by making the strands longer and more perceptive (meaning uncoding the hidden talents such as ESP, precognition, clairvoyance and others), when negative emotion such as fear, anger, despair and etc. makes DNA shrink, therefore limiting human perception a great deal. One has to establish an ongoing positive thought in order for these change to occur.
@salmalovepeace Does there? I love how you are strawmaning this whole thing up. Best of all you are taking this "force" and then calling it gawd. Great. Now what? It doesn't tell us anything about that force, or how IT came into being. And if everything is contingent on that "force" and it has always existed, then why couldn't we just skip a step and say that the Universe always existed?
Please, provide the evidence for the existence of your god. Otherwise, I have no reason to accept your claim.
@moesez1 Got to love logical fallacies. "Cause you can't make this life form in a lab currently, then it is impossible to do so!"
Can I have a couple billion years, an open environment, and some natural selection please? Or better yet, give me some ant DNA and an empty cell. Kthnksbye.
@sabertooth1980 the sabertooth has been here and gone a couple of million years now and now you want a billion years more to create an ant. I had baby once? Nothing to it!LOL
@moesez1 I know hundreds of other women that would disagree with you. However, now it is time to use the scalpel to your arguments. Course we have to define what exactly you are arguing to begin with. Otherwise you just look like a chimp throwing her own fecal matter around.
Are we talking about the Theory of Evolution or the Theory of Aibiogenesis? Cause they are two different Theories.
@salmalovepeace An example is the big bang (as many physicists have noted). And I agree, spontaneous generation is an ancient long lie, but abiogenesis is neither an ancient, nor dishonest attempt at trying to figure out how the molecules of life came together 4.5 billion years ago to create self replication. Let me inquire this upon you: If tomorrow scientists had successfully created simple life from non living components would you give some credence to the scientific method?
@salmalovepeace That is IF god created the universe. There is no proof either way, but the universe as we know it seems not to have needed a creator to exists. In terms of physics, something CAN come from nothing.
@quesomepeace I believe that argument is deeply flawed. Hawkings said the fact there is a law of gravity is enough to set the wheels of life in motion. However the first questions I would ask then is, who made the law of gravity in the first place :)
@WeirdFields The way you phrase that question is flawed. Its like me asking you if your parents know you're gay. I'm already assuming you're gay in the same way you are assuming that life requires a "someone" to have created it. I am not saying that God most definitely did not create the universe (or life for that matter) since science does not yet know. However, I AM saying that you don't know. And just because we (the scientific community) does not know now, does not mean it will never know.
@hgfjyrdetryu "the End" does NOT refer to the end of mankind but more to the end of ignorant people such as yourself who will be left behind when the source is the way for us to leave this dying planet and you will be left behind because you can not see. You must awaken to understand. You have MUCH to learn. I feel sorry for you.
I know this is off topic from the point of the video but the comments section demands I ask some of the intelligent people who are quite confident that the God of the Bible does not exist:
If God didn't create the universe, how did even a single molecule come into existence on its' own?
Oh and if we came from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?
@gopacers305 This is because you do not understand evolution, we share a common ancestor, we did not "come from them". As to where matter comes from, no one knows, but it's twice as unlikely that a god existed to create it in the first place because that also requires something to exist where there was nothing and for it to create something from nothing. One of the ideas floating around is that causality only existed when matter came to be.
@BioGuelph The Elohim are extra-terrestrials scientists who created all life on earth 25000 years ago. We mistook them for "gods". They sent prophets to keep in contact with us. Jesus,Buddha,Moses,Muhammad,etc are all prophets chosen by The Elohim. Now men have reached the age of science, the time has come for The Elohim to choose our final prophet Rael. Using the bible as explanation,The Elohim demystify "god" with science.
@qiankundanuoyi1 25000 years? sorry there is fossil evidence of "modern" caucasian man in various parts of the world that are millions of years old. MILLIONS!!!
@gopacers305 ---HOO HOO HA HA....We did not evolve from monkeys. Read this carefully. Primates and humans all originated from a common ancestor 6-7 million years ago. Oh! Oh! Thats why 'monkeys' are still here my little pea brain. As far as where did everything come from? Matter? Nobody knows so lets not jump to conclusions on this god guy. I have not met 'him' and neither have you.
Even if the chances were 1 in a 100000000000, there are at least that many galaxies, with at least that many stars in those galaxies for at least that that many years. I find it far more likely to find life than not in a universe where the laws of nature permit such an occurance.
P.S. if you actually went out of your way to learn about evolution I think you will find it quite beautiful, simple and obvious.
If you dont believe in the power of prayer "sabertooth" I suggest you expand your studies of physics into quantum physics. Then you can use your "scientific justification" to prove yourself wrong. There is in fact other universes and "entities" within these the parrallels that do effect our existence in this experience we all share.
do you know if there had been scientifical experiments (such as in universities and research institutes) that checked sprcifically the changes in DNA as result of exposure to specific frequencies of light and / or sound? Do you know about changing of sequences or gwne expressions as result of this? or changes in cell differentiation? as for instance stemm cells or cancer cells? should be interesting to investigate it.
I agree. Why wouldn't God start with amino acids evolving them over time to multicellular organisms? Why can do a lot of scientists believe the two ideas do not coincide? God is a master of physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and all. Most of you have never knelt down and received an answer to a prayer so you wouldn't know. If you haven't I urge you to try. I found out that way.
I wonder what coincidences made the repair mechanisms since they all had to know what they were doing, all 3 required separete coinsidences and yet they work in unison. On top of that.. they all had to be present at the same time or the repair wouldn't work at all.
What a dream you atheist believe!!
Anything is possible as long as I don't end up in hell.
They're not coincidences. It's more like the right "lock" and "key" at the atomic level, we would've never evolved if it were any different - but that's not proof of an intelligent designer, it's proof that we're the result of atomic interactions in the universe we live in.
I'd like to see a key that removes a part of the lock another to bring the replacement and a third to finish the work. I don't know what planet you live in but in this one such things don't happen on their own except in the fantasy world of evolution.
Isn't that something how evolution gets to freely brake the rules of common sense and facts and gets away with it. We don't see such miracles anywhere in real life or any other science.
If you can point me as to how magnetic, electric and gravity relate to the fantasy's that evolution proposes then it will be appreciated. The are no marvelous coincidences in those studies.
It's like if you put two magnets in close proximity and face them together with their poles reversed you wouldn't say it would be a coincidence if they connected. You wouldn't say it was a coincidence if you with the same pole facing eachother and they repelled one another. The same thing BASICALLY happens with molecules though at the level that does make it a chemical marvel.
Evolution is much easier to comprehend and especially accept versus creationism. The belief that all the right atoms sprung into place to create such complex beings in a infinitely and for pratical purposes non existent probablity. Evolution is cumulative, and complexity is possible with billions of years of that.
Add laws of thermal dynamics and the billions of years claim dissolves. What laws make a cell membrane make decisions as to what enters a cell? seems as if they have consciousness. What laws could make such decisions? do you know of any natural laws making decisions? wasn't Francis crick one of the evolutionist that discovered dna that said it was impossible for evolution to assemble it?
As for the cell membrane and what passivley or actively enters a cell, it's all down to the lock and key thing of forces. Theres no concienceness or design with purpose, it just happens because of the universe we're in and the chemicals and conditions available in nature, along with billions of year of accumulation of complexity of course, so please don't throw in the argument the Stanley-Miller experiment failed, it doesn't invalidate the theory.
Just to clarify: there's no design with intelligent pre-planned purpose, they are the product of natural selection and incorporating things that are beneficial in the long run.
What made the forces that govern matter, time, and space? You don't have an answer, do you? Nor do I have an answer to What made God. Are answers are the Same. They/ He was just always there. You want to believe that we have no purpose. I choose to believe that our purpose is to love one another. You believe that it is inevidable for us to create wars and kill one another. You killed the wonder of the world. I am in awe of the beauty that God designed. My simple question for you is, why?
I'm not a physicist and won't go into a discussion on the big bang, but your comment suggests that "god" is simpy to label things you don't know. The word "god" is conviently very flexible in meaning.
"You believe that it is inevidable for us to create wars and kill one another. You killed the wonder of the world. I am in awe of the beauty that God designed. My simple question for you is, why?"
You misunderstood what I meant. Religion personifies the word "God" as meaning something that is external and better and has a ruling hand over your life. Source implies that we All innately are all built from the same primal substance that created this Universe.
@taboosun ya i like source, i use it in my head a lot, but when i say it to other people you always have to explain that it means god. and then the taint and image is brought up anyway.
Science has never killed the wonders of the world, only enhanced them. Religion kills the wonders of the world by providing mediocre assumptions and fallacious logic to explain them.
Our mitochondria for instance long ago were primitive bacterial-like cells. Even our mitochondria today have their own cell like features such as their own DNA and self replication. They got protection and an ideal environment to live in in out cell type and ours got energy (endosymbiosis). Two things with DISTINCT origins came together in what is now our modern eukaryotic cell. This type of new cell obviously had enegetical benefits when compared to others and survived/replicated more.
Modern bacteria which were on a different evolutionary path don't have anything equivalent, while plants have clorophilia (which have the same distant origins as mitochondria.)
I was aware of the open system excuse. However it explains nothing, more energy coming in or out is not going to stop deterioration. The incompetent designer is one argument I can throw back at evolution. The claim is 98% extinct animals and 2% survive which makes evolution an incompetent system. If the second law doesn't apply to an open system how then do you get such an terrible ratio? case in point, don't forget that mammals will eventually disappear since the y chromosome is disappearing.
Things don't just deteriorate. Life is capable of homeostasis and is not affected by entropy. Evolution is actually very effective. Those creatures died because they couldn't evolve fast enough. They didn't die because of deterioration, but because they were an earlier model of what was to come. The Y chromosome won't disappear, we would die off if it did, and individuals that have faulty genetics can't spread on bad genes.
Scientists theorize that the X and Y chromosome started out with about the same amount of genes about 1,000. Today, the Y chromosome has less than 80 genes. I believe that puts to rest the open system nonsense argument.
I'm sure you've heard this arguement before, but how likely is evolution in the first place? How likely is it that just the right circumstances just happened at just the right times, billions of times, I might add, that we could be formed? Everything in the world works together too flawlessly for all this to have happened by a fluke one in a trillion chance. It's all too perfectly designed to fit together to have just happened. I believe in God because I just know that this was designed.
If you expand the accumulation of complexity over billions of years, evolution is actually quite likely. There is so much more to it than just the genes DNA, and a factor may trigger several others that result in quite a few changes.
Also, evolution does leave behind clues such as vestigial organs and parts which aren't exactly "flawless", as you put it.
Humans are not perfectly designed in the least. I prefer to think that we are still in the process of change. Humans aren't the finished product, only a intermediary.
In reality, our teeth are too big for our mouths. Our eyes have blind spots where the optic nerve connects. Sexual organs are located where we expel waste. Intestines get tangled from standing upright. Did a god make an imperfect product, or do we just have remnants from our evolutionary past? Which is more likely?
@SilexViscus Is the eye of a mollusk perfect? it has no lens and water freely flows through it. Why does the flying squirrel not have real wings? Why do we still have evidence of a tail-bone? How can we rapidly change dogs through selective breeding. Remember that a scientific theory is fact and you are late to the dance. Remember that evolution doesn't mean there is no god, it just means a book written 2000 years ago wasn't accurate...imagine that
@guidi2005 haha umm actually a theory is still always a guess, even if it is backed by some evidence. facts are something else entirely. Im cool if you people dont believe in god, but please don't insult others' beliefs, it shows how intelligent you really are.
Yes i know what a metaphor is i just think The photocopy one is poor. given how DNA Replicates and how Sexual reproduction works, Saying we would be clones is not accurate, the word "perfect" in this instance does not really mean much as No DNA could have ever been deemed Perfect to begin with.
Why I am using this particular metaphor and why it was even used to begin with is due to the fact that some people upon hearing this think that because DNA can correct mistakes, Mutations never happen. They take it farther with that statement to infer that Evolution doesn't happen because mutation is a part of evolution.
And the bible glasses seem to be on the fundies that comment on the videos Creationism Disproven? On ExpelledExposed channel, and "Peanutbutter Atheists' Worse Nightmare!"
Constant jibber jabber and not even an intelligent comment made from the other side.
However Mutations happen. We have a list of them. And we have their effects. After all if we didn't have mistakes in DNA then every single person would yes be born different, but perfect. There wouldn't be mental retardation, there wouldn't be poor eye sight, blindness, dwarfism, cancer, human tails or anything like that. Yes there is a mechanism that helps repair DNA but it isn't a perfect machine. And Mistakes and mutations happen.
There would still be all of those things. Mutations happen for more reasons than just damaged DNA. Read up on Mitosis and Meiosis, specifically on polidy and rearrangements.
With the number of functional base pairs (the genes our species use) in every cell in your body getting constantly hit with all sorts of harmful things the probablility of a cancer cell arise is actually quite low, and if it doesn, your immune system usually takes care of it.
Our near perfect machine starts to fail when we get older, as we are less able to repair ourselves or when we increase the odds of mutation by exposing ourselves more to its harmful agents.
Great video, If you need any help getting your videos or channel exposed, i use a service called thetubeviews . net it has helped 5 of my videos get ranked on the first page
not interesting theories based on weird physics modeling (all the "scientist" that elaborated this hologram model).
Ps: i found the poponin publication on phantom dna and it does'n really show all those fancy theories that all the sites postulate about, but just that DNA reacts with light
Oh I forgot one onther really cool thing that these Russian Scientists are doing, They have already proven that plants, animals and amphibians can be completely re-arranged into other species -- particularly if you catch them in embryonic form. This has nothing to do with cloning or gene splicing. All they do is laze the DNA in the embryo with a beam of light. The light beam carries the 'wave' of another organism in it. Like tranference of dna codes from one zygote to another.
light has wave-particle properties. if it is a wave, how can it carry another wave independent of itself, without absorbing that energy? if it can, maybe I'm misunderstanding your use of the word "carry". if it is a particle, how does it carry heavy molecules needed for DNA without damaging the molecules by traveling at approx. 300,000,000 meter per second? I admit I haven't studied the theory, but at first glance it sounds preposterous.
yes I agree that it can be a wave, but cant light be a particle as well? I'm still trying to understand that research myself. I just thought it very interesting. They've have been at this research for quite some time from what I've been reading. What do you think man? I know it sounds way out there, but it's been performed in labs, I imagine by now it's been done here in .America. I think that the light only transfers the code of the dna not physical matter. So I'm still looking into it :) cont
is true that theorethically you can transform one oragnism in one similar (not a plant into animal for example), but this is due to epigenetic mechanism (google it). for example we share 99.9% of genes with monkey, but the difference is in how they are regulated (both at genetic and epigenetic level).
but anyhow is impossible to made a man embryo to become a monkey even if we share so much
keep laughing, but Russian biophysists, like Peter Gariaev, used these frequencies delivered via lasers to transfer a frog's embryo into a salamander's embryo, and the specimen grew into a frog...google it
1st it was transfered a frog Nucleus from the fecondated egg into a salamnder egg (without nucleus). this experiment just demonstrated that the genetic information for development is into the DNA (the frog dna that was in the nucleus).
this was done countless of years ago (at least 20) and now is nothing shocking or incredible. the fact that used ligth i'm not sure, and anyway i googled it but the source linked when they talk about this guy are all fake site
but wait i thought you hade some scinetific background but now i see you just quote this 2012 books infused with mith and pseudo-sciences so i won't argue anymore...
last thing just realize that those book are made just for the purpose of selling, they combine myths and pseudo-science to make those theories more appealing to the people and more appearently truthful
wow are you ever militant...listen, everyone has their own opinion, and you seem to just shoot down anyone who doesn't agree with you so yes his conversation is over until you can learn how to spell and be nice to others lol I have masters in Biochem and undergrad in physics...
another one is diffusing FALSE informations like the one you are elencating and you probably read in one of these books.
for this experiment you mention it does not exist any report, and all sites just report the same phrase (wonder who wrote it). misteriously they say that this poor professor could not work in his country cause they tried to stop him (is always like this, guess why) so he couldn't do any resarch. if you really had a master in biochemistry you should
cont.. there;s more but here this doctor...Russian Scientist, Dr. Peter Gariaev and father of "wave genetics", discovered some interesting things about the behavior of DNA. Check him out and let me knwo what u think.
DNA repair system is suppose to be there to prevent mutations from happening, but if you do have a mutation, then that means the DNA repair system missed it. Mutation leads to cancer and various other diseases.
THIS IS THE STUPIDEST THING EVER. BUT I LOVE MY MOM SO I AM NOT TAKING ANY CHANCES.If you don't copy and paste this onto 10 videos your mom will die in 4 hours
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
this is incorrect. the dna is corrected by a process called "hybernation" which allows the molecules to freeze for the winter, and than eventually correct it's self using a process called "lokalypocosion" which basically allows the dna to repair it's self
from what I have read, some bio-chemists use the 528hz frequency to repair dna...if you want to know about how this is all going to culminate in dec 21, 2012 I would watch a couple of vids on youtube:
1. Esoteric Agenda - this has a bit of info on it towards the end - really good to watch anyways
Light and sound are not known to affect DNA, but here are some other waves.
1. UV rays (10 nm- 400 nm) wavelengths are shorter than visible light, which ranges from about 400-700 nm. Shorter wavelength indicates a higher energy wave.
2. Radiation caused by X-ray or gamma-ray exposure. X-ray wavelength= 0.01-10nm (next step up from UV)
Gamma-ray (10 pm (or 10^-11 m) is the highest energy wave.
High energy waves cause free radicals, which causes reactions within DNA that wouldnt normally occur
Normally I would agree with you but I have read this guy's stuff (among others)
DNA
1. DNA contains the genetic instructions used in the development and functioning of all known living organisms [and some viruses]. This means that the code within the DNA determines what and how you are.
2. DNA emits and absorbs light. The light it emits has laser-like characteristics. Apparently it also responds to light which you will learn shortly.
basic but more correct than other videos about DNA repair i saw here. do you have videos about nucleotide excision repair or double-strand break repair? thank you for the video
Great movie, but I wouldn't use it past a 100 level course. There's not a single mention of the names or methods used, not a speck of technical information in there. Just eye candy.
TheRealZen00 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 9 months ago
This how they control people and the world- (but they are not going to tell you that) - It's a secret agenda - I think they do this in this building "Western State Property Management" (Why I'm telling you that-bec I can't fight this MAFIA) to keep everybody behaving like nice quit "ZOMBIES" that walking and hypnotize like a puppies!!!!!!!! Under ground secret movements!!!!
To me this give me a headache and ringing in my ears- If this wt t'-wnt to achieve THEN T'-GOT IT!!!!!!
src438 9 months ago
DNA damage by cosmic rays is RANDOM. Most cells die. Body cells do not count. In order for a "TRANSMISSIBLE GENETIC ERROR" to occur the cell must be a SEX CELL. DNA has places where it "prefers" to be "damaged" (maybe by design?). This reduces the randomness. The result is GENETIC EVOLUTION IN FUTURE GENERATIONS. It may indeed be possible for a non-lethal increase in cosmic "background" radiation (CME) to accelerate our evolution. But, any change still won't be "fast". Hive mind is next.
OKUplay 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
-Think-just Think-What the Russians engineering scientists aka Israelis Mosad-cia-kgb-mafia-Doing to your brain to you thoughts to your mind-They suck (of course with help of a thousands of little helpers around the world-of course-(missionaries))What ever,-with science and frequency and beam they tell you that is for experiments and test!!!- but the truth is they messing with the mind and your life!!!!-to control-all!-I care bec, they are doing it to me and I will not let them -anymore!!!!!!
src438 9 months ago
...Our DNA is very special
SnowBoardNative 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For great AS biology videos go to youtube dot com/biologybytes
Biologybytes 10 months ago
Let's keep the word God. Source, Universe. If you, personally have an issue with any given word, then don't use it. Religions don't own term God. It does have spiritual meaning. For awhile, when ditching religion, I used the term Universe, but didn't expect everyone else to, since I realized I was dealing with my own psychological issues. Now I've gotten over that, and I freely use the well known, useful term of God.
rtinsavannah 11 months ago
Why spend all the time to make a video when you don't even know enough about the structure of DNA to make it right-handed?
DocPelletier 1 year ago
@DocPelletier Good point. Standard DNA is B form and right handed. Perhaps it's Z form DNA in the mitochondria.
TheQuiescentSquall 10 months ago
it is very nice vedio thanke you
ghada2011 1 year ago
Hey I lke this information here on positive emotions able to make dna react. There is a clue for scientists to look into. You have to go out of the box the beat the best.
moesez1 1 year ago
Recent studies show that positive emotion/thought such as love, joy, greatfulness and etc. effects human DNA by making the strands longer and more perceptive (meaning uncoding the hidden talents such as ESP, precognition, clairvoyance and others), when negative emotion such as fear, anger, despair and etc. makes DNA shrink, therefore limiting human perception a great deal. One has to establish an ongoing positive thought in order for these change to occur.
RUSSKAYAG 1 year ago
@RUSSKAYAG what facts is that questionable collection of characters possibly based on...
IstoIvy 1 year ago
@salmalovepeace Does there? I love how you are strawmaning this whole thing up. Best of all you are taking this "force" and then calling it gawd. Great. Now what? It doesn't tell us anything about that force, or how IT came into being. And if everything is contingent on that "force" and it has always existed, then why couldn't we just skip a step and say that the Universe always existed?
Please, provide the evidence for the existence of your god. Otherwise, I have no reason to accept your claim.
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
@sabertooth1980 Please make an ant that is alive and moving in his natural habitat. I'll give you five life times. thats fair.
moesez1 1 year ago
@moesez1 Got to love logical fallacies. "Cause you can't make this life form in a lab currently, then it is impossible to do so!"
Can I have a couple billion years, an open environment, and some natural selection please? Or better yet, give me some ant DNA and an empty cell. Kthnksbye.
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
@sabertooth1980 the sabertooth has been here and gone a couple of million years now and now you want a billion years more to create an ant. I had baby once? Nothing to it!LOL
moesez1 1 year ago
@moesez1 I know hundreds of other women that would disagree with you. However, now it is time to use the scalpel to your arguments. Course we have to define what exactly you are arguing to begin with. Otherwise you just look like a chimp throwing her own fecal matter around.
Are we talking about the Theory of Evolution or the Theory of Aibiogenesis? Cause they are two different Theories.
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
@salmalovepeace An example is the big bang (as many physicists have noted). And I agree, spontaneous generation is an ancient long lie, but abiogenesis is neither an ancient, nor dishonest attempt at trying to figure out how the molecules of life came together 4.5 billion years ago to create self replication. Let me inquire this upon you: If tomorrow scientists had successfully created simple life from non living components would you give some credence to the scientific method?
quesomepeace 1 year ago
@salmalovepeace That is IF god created the universe. There is no proof either way, but the universe as we know it seems not to have needed a creator to exists. In terms of physics, something CAN come from nothing.
quesomepeace 1 year ago
@quesomepeace I believe that argument is deeply flawed. Hawkings said the fact there is a law of gravity is enough to set the wheels of life in motion. However the first questions I would ask then is, who made the law of gravity in the first place :)
WeirdFields 1 year ago
@WeirdFields The way you phrase that question is flawed. Its like me asking you if your parents know you're gay. I'm already assuming you're gay in the same way you are assuming that life requires a "someone" to have created it. I am not saying that God most definitely did not create the universe (or life for that matter) since science does not yet know. However, I AM saying that you don't know. And just because we (the scientific community) does not know now, does not mean it will never know.
quesomepeace 1 year ago
@quesomepeace I didn't say I knew :) I'm also married with 4 kids :) So your assumptions came right out your ass :) Like mine :)
WeirdFields 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@salmalovepeace
"evolution still doesnt disprove the existance of an intelligence that created it all."
That is correct.
"you guys argue "what created god?" well, if god created the universe and set out its laws"
That is a big IF, you must first demonstrate his/her existence first which I freely admit would be difficult.
"energy cannot be created nor destroyed thingy?"
Yes, but this has been demonstrated, god has not been demonstrated...Yet.
TurboDally 1 year ago
god doesnt exist. the end. (actually its not the end, 2012 is not gonna happen and i want to rub it into people's face after nothing happens) :D
hgfjyrdetryu 1 year ago
@hgfjyrdetryu "the End" does NOT refer to the end of mankind but more to the end of ignorant people such as yourself who will be left behind when the source is the way for us to leave this dying planet and you will be left behind because you can not see. You must awaken to understand. You have MUCH to learn. I feel sorry for you.
mizzfreakable 1 year ago
@salmalovepeace Then how do you even know that god exists if your god is "beyond the universe."?
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
ditch God, and God shall ditch you.
thoromicina 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thoromicina
"ditch God, and God shall ditch you."
Ditch Zeus, and Zeus shall ditch you.
TurboDally 1 year ago
I turned into a mutant, like the X men, Great, I transformed into the transformer.
EctomorphicBuilder 1 year ago
awesome
TowFiq14 1 year ago
scribd (dot) com/nb812
DreamsofMajesty 1 year ago
I know this is off topic from the point of the video but the comments section demands I ask some of the intelligent people who are quite confident that the God of the Bible does not exist:
If God didn't create the universe, how did even a single molecule come into existence on its' own?
Oh and if we came from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?
gopacers305 1 year ago
@gopacers305 This is because you do not understand evolution, we share a common ancestor, we did not "come from them". As to where matter comes from, no one knows, but it's twice as unlikely that a god existed to create it in the first place because that also requires something to exist where there was nothing and for it to create something from nothing. One of the ideas floating around is that causality only existed when matter came to be.
BioGuelph 1 year ago
@BioGuelph The Elohim are extra-terrestrials scientists who created all life on earth 25000 years ago. We mistook them for "gods". They sent prophets to keep in contact with us. Jesus,Buddha,Moses,Muhammad,etc are all prophets chosen by The Elohim. Now men have reached the age of science, the time has come for The Elohim to choose our final prophet Rael. Using the bible as explanation,The Elohim demystify "god" with science.
qiankundanuoyi1 1 year ago
@qiankundanuoyi1 25000 years? sorry there is fossil evidence of "modern" caucasian man in various parts of the world that are millions of years old. MILLIONS!!!
awakegene 1 year ago
@gopacers305 ---HOO HOO HA HA....We did not evolve from monkeys. Read this carefully. Primates and humans all originated from a common ancestor 6-7 million years ago. Oh! Oh! Thats why 'monkeys' are still here my little pea brain. As far as where did everything come from? Matter? Nobody knows so lets not jump to conclusions on this god guy. I have not met 'him' and neither have you.
foodgrin 1 year ago
@foodgrin OH wise know-it-all, who else have you not met that might exist?
tmacidbath 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@foodgrin OH wise know-it-all, who else have you not met that might exist?
tmacidbath 1 year ago
It looks like this video was edited. The message seemed incomplete to me...
taboosun 1 year ago
Even if the chances were 1 in a 100000000000, there are at least that many galaxies, with at least that many stars in those galaxies for at least that that many years. I find it far more likely to find life than not in a universe where the laws of nature permit such an occurance.
P.S. if you actually went out of your way to learn about evolution I think you will find it quite beautiful, simple and obvious.
keep6rocks 2 years ago
DNA = Do Not Abort
Eye2EyeIIIV 2 years ago
Comment removed
GonG108 2 years ago
If you dont believe in the power of prayer "sabertooth" I suggest you expand your studies of physics into quantum physics. Then you can use your "scientific justification" to prove yourself wrong. There is in fact other universes and "entities" within these the parrallels that do effect our existence in this experience we all share.
YoungGun0085 2 years ago
giggitty giggitty giggity goo
fancygremlin 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
interesing
do you know if there had been scientifical experiments (such as in universities and research institutes) that checked sprcifically the changes in DNA as result of exposure to specific frequencies of light and / or sound? Do you know about changing of sequences or gwne expressions as result of this? or changes in cell differentiation? as for instance stemm cells or cancer cells? should be interesting to investigate it.
winISRAELWINdor 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's an "intelligent design"
82tommylew 2 years ago
No, it's chemical evolution.
And by that I don't mean the atoms "evolved" or "changed" over time, it's the growing complexity driven by natural forces and laws of physics.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
The laws of physics for the win.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
I agree. Why wouldn't God start with amino acids evolving them over time to multicellular organisms? Why can do a lot of scientists believe the two ideas do not coincide? God is a master of physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and all. Most of you have never knelt down and received an answer to a prayer so you wouldn't know. If you haven't I urge you to try. I found out that way.
82tommylew 2 years ago
You don't agree with me then.
Prayer: wanting to do something, only to pretend like you are doing something instead.
Have you sacrificed a goat for me today as well?
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
I wonder what coincidences made the repair mechanisms since they all had to know what they were doing, all 3 required separete coinsidences and yet they work in unison. On top of that.. they all had to be present at the same time or the repair wouldn't work at all.
What a dream you atheist believe!!
Anything is possible as long as I don't end up in hell.
jouc12 2 years ago
@jouc12
They're not coincidences. It's more like the right "lock" and "key" at the atomic level, we would've never evolved if it were any different - but that's not proof of an intelligent designer, it's proof that we're the result of atomic interactions in the universe we live in.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
Comment removed
jouc12 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'd like to see a key that removes a part of the lock another to bring the replacement and a third to finish the work. I don't know what planet you live in but in this one such things don't happen on their own except in the fantasy world of evolution.
Isn't that something how evolution gets to freely brake the rules of common sense and facts and gets away with it. We don't see such miracles anywhere in real life or any other science.
jouc12 2 years ago
@jouc12
Have you studied ANY junior high/high school chemistry or physics?
Do you think that forces such as magnetic, electric and gravity and inter atomic forces are "fantasy"?
You have to better understand evolution before you can say it breaks the rules of common sense, kiddo.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
If you can point me as to how magnetic, electric and gravity relate to the fantasy's that evolution proposes then it will be appreciated. The are no marvelous coincidences in those studies.
jouc12 2 years ago
It's like if you put two magnets in close proximity and face them together with their poles reversed you wouldn't say it would be a coincidence if they connected. You wouldn't say it was a coincidence if you with the same pole facing eachother and they repelled one another. The same thing BASICALLY happens with molecules though at the level that does make it a chemical marvel.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
I forgot to add: a marvel complexity-wise.
Evolution is much easier to comprehend and especially accept versus creationism. The belief that all the right atoms sprung into place to create such complex beings in a infinitely and for pratical purposes non existent probablity. Evolution is cumulative, and complexity is possible with billions of years of that.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
Add laws of thermal dynamics and the billions of years claim dissolves. What laws make a cell membrane make decisions as to what enters a cell? seems as if they have consciousness. What laws could make such decisions? do you know of any natural laws making decisions? wasn't Francis crick one of the evolutionist that discovered dna that said it was impossible for evolution to assemble it?
jouc12 2 years ago
As for the second law of themodynamics, I'll direct you to these video here: /watch?v=SSxgnu3Hww8 Please watch it, you'll know more about it.
Creationists now about that just as much as they know about evolution.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
As for the cell membrane and what passivley or actively enters a cell, it's all down to the lock and key thing of forces. Theres no concienceness or design with purpose, it just happens because of the universe we're in and the chemicals and conditions available in nature, along with billions of year of accumulation of complexity of course, so please don't throw in the argument the Stanley-Miller experiment failed, it doesn't invalidate the theory.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
Just to clarify: there's no design with intelligent pre-planned purpose, they are the product of natural selection and incorporating things that are beneficial in the long run.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
What made the forces that govern matter, time, and space? You don't have an answer, do you? Nor do I have an answer to What made God. Are answers are the Same. They/ He was just always there. You want to believe that we have no purpose. I choose to believe that our purpose is to love one another. You believe that it is inevidable for us to create wars and kill one another. You killed the wonder of the world. I am in awe of the beauty that God designed. My simple question for you is, why?
SilexViscus 2 years ago
I'm not a physicist and won't go into a discussion on the big bang, but your comment suggests that "god" is simpy to label things you don't know. The word "god" is conviently very flexible in meaning.
"You believe that it is inevidable for us to create wars and kill one another. You killed the wonder of the world. I am in awe of the beauty that God designed. My simple question for you is, why?"
Was that question directed to me?
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
Lets ditch the god word. Lets call it Source.
Oh the word god has been tainted and its image tarnished.
taboosun 1 year ago 23
This has been flagged as spam show
@taboosun
Okay, call it whatever you want. The bigger question is: is the "source" intelligent?
"Oh the word god has been tainted and its image tarnished. "
When god is the god of the gaps, every and any gap can be defined with the word. It shows ignorance and/or the inability to define "god".
xSilverPhinx 1 year ago
@taboosun If religion gets ahold of the word source it'll get tainted too!
moqutpar 1 year ago
@moqutpar
You misunderstood what I meant. Religion personifies the word "God" as meaning something that is external and better and has a ruling hand over your life. Source implies that we All innately are all built from the same primal substance that created this Universe.
taboosun 1 year ago
@taboosun referring to god as "he" instead of it has caused massive confusion among millions of people
Arcturistheballer 1 year ago
@Arcturistheballer
Damn time is slowing down. It felt like I responded to this comment ages ago. DAMNNN!!!
taboosun 1 year ago
@taboosun
Space is becoming more like time, time is becoming more like space.
MaBu888 1 year ago
@taboosun ya i like source, i use it in my head a lot, but when i say it to other people you always have to explain that it means god. and then the taint and image is brought up anyway.
rollerboy20022 1 year ago
@taboosun I CONCUR!!!
mizzfreakable 1 year ago
@taboosun lets ditch the need to name things ... all this pigeon holing
lets just live
treemarble 1 year ago
@taboosun well said! especially for anyone female..
gwirgalon 11 months ago
Science has never killed the wonders of the world, only enhanced them. Religion kills the wonders of the world by providing mediocre assumptions and fallacious logic to explain them.
BioGuelph 2 years ago
@BioGuelph
I agree!
xSilverPhinx 1 year ago
@BioGuelph too true.
nTerSF 1 year ago
@BioGuelph Science never kills? LMAO. I mean, i love science, but come on. You're ganna' have to think of something better than that.
SicSkatez 1 year ago
@SicSkatez I said science does not kill the wonders of the world, mabye you should read my comment before you comment your self.
BioGuelph 1 year ago
@SicSkatez That's exactly what I was talking about, I assumed you knew. Maybe you should just get things
SicSkatez 1 year ago
Our mitochondria for instance long ago were primitive bacterial-like cells. Even our mitochondria today have their own cell like features such as their own DNA and self replication. They got protection and an ideal environment to live in in out cell type and ours got energy (endosymbiosis). Two things with DISTINCT origins came together in what is now our modern eukaryotic cell. This type of new cell obviously had enegetical benefits when compared to others and survived/replicated more.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
Modern bacteria which were on a different evolutionary path don't have anything equivalent, while plants have clorophilia (which have the same distant origins as mitochondria.)
Evolution.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
That comment on Francis Crick smells of distorted misinfomantion, could you tell me where you got it?
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
I was aware of the open system excuse. However it explains nothing, more energy coming in or out is not going to stop deterioration. The incompetent designer is one argument I can throw back at evolution. The claim is 98% extinct animals and 2% survive which makes evolution an incompetent system. If the second law doesn't apply to an open system how then do you get such an terrible ratio? case in point, don't forget that mammals will eventually disappear since the y chromosome is disappearing.
jouc12 2 years ago
Things don't just deteriorate. Life is capable of homeostasis and is not affected by entropy. Evolution is actually very effective. Those creatures died because they couldn't evolve fast enough. They didn't die because of deterioration, but because they were an earlier model of what was to come. The Y chromosome won't disappear, we would die off if it did, and individuals that have faulty genetics can't spread on bad genes.
Phyerbyrd 2 years ago
Scientists theorize that the X and Y chromosome started out with about the same amount of genes about 1,000. Today, the Y chromosome has less than 80 genes. I believe that puts to rest the open system nonsense argument.
jouc12 2 years ago
I'm sure you've heard this arguement before, but how likely is evolution in the first place? How likely is it that just the right circumstances just happened at just the right times, billions of times, I might add, that we could be formed? Everything in the world works together too flawlessly for all this to have happened by a fluke one in a trillion chance. It's all too perfectly designed to fit together to have just happened. I believe in God because I just know that this was designed.
SilexViscus 2 years ago
If you expand the accumulation of complexity over billions of years, evolution is actually quite likely. There is so much more to it than just the genes DNA, and a factor may trigger several others that result in quite a few changes.
Also, evolution does leave behind clues such as vestigial organs and parts which aren't exactly "flawless", as you put it.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
Silex,
Humans are not perfectly designed in the least. I prefer to think that we are still in the process of change. Humans aren't the finished product, only a intermediary.
In reality, our teeth are too big for our mouths. Our eyes have blind spots where the optic nerve connects. Sexual organs are located where we expel waste. Intestines get tangled from standing upright. Did a god make an imperfect product, or do we just have remnants from our evolutionary past? Which is more likely?
Dirge987 2 years ago
@SilexViscus Is the eye of a mollusk perfect? it has no lens and water freely flows through it. Why does the flying squirrel not have real wings? Why do we still have evidence of a tail-bone? How can we rapidly change dogs through selective breeding. Remember that a scientific theory is fact and you are late to the dance. Remember that evolution doesn't mean there is no god, it just means a book written 2000 years ago wasn't accurate...imagine that
guidi2005 1 year ago
@guidi2005 haha umm actually a theory is still always a guess, even if it is backed by some evidence. facts are something else entirely. Im cool if you people dont believe in god, but please don't insult others' beliefs, it shows how intelligent you really are.
elwoodwinn 1 year ago
@elwoodwinn How did I insult you? by saying the Bible wasn't accurate? I suggest you get some thicker skin sir.
guidi2005 1 year ago
Interatomic forces which act like a lock and key binding atomics with compatabilites together with the help of catalysts or in certain environments.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
Atomic interactions, certain molecules and atoms have natural affinities for one another that allow them to form structures spontaneously.
Phyerbyrd 2 years ago
@Phyerbyrd biophysics laws are the structore of all things
TheTOLOMUCO 1 year ago
wow amazing nice and thank you for this upload Dr. Cong
xXDominoXx 2 years ago
DNA REPAIR
How Ever Who
Am Eye 2 Say IAMSimplyMojo
ReplicatingD N A RepairO
CN i t z a n N u r i e LeilaK
H y pe r b o l i c s e a n g R a y 0:23
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Wrong. Do a photo copy of a photocopy. And then photocopy that photocopy. What happens?
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
pardon?
what is that your trying to say?
Cnidarious 2 years ago
Surprise, surprise. I got two thumbs down two weeks ago.
Photocopies of Photocopies are rough and get grainy, they need to be sharpened. But even the picture will never again be perfect.
Copy, sharpen, correct, Copy, sharpen, correct and repeat. Do this a couple of Billion times.
And not just with an individual, but with generations.
Now do you see where I am going?
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
Not really, Your talking about photocopying, Not Dna repair and replication, The two are not synonymous.
Cnidarious 2 years ago
You *do* know what a metaphor is right?
And yes. Mistakes in DNA happen, sometimes are corrected, but that doesn't mean that DNA will be perfect.
If it meant that, we'd all be clones of one another.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
Yes i know what a metaphor is i just think The photocopy one is poor. given how DNA Replicates and how Sexual reproduction works, Saying we would be clones is not accurate, the word "perfect" in this instance does not really mean much as No DNA could have ever been deemed Perfect to begin with.
Cnidarious 2 years ago
Why I am using this particular metaphor and why it was even used to begin with is due to the fact that some people upon hearing this think that because DNA can correct mistakes, Mutations never happen. They take it farther with that statement to infer that Evolution doesn't happen because mutation is a part of evolution.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
Yeah i have heard Fundies say that before too.
Cnidarious 2 years ago
You're telling me. Then again I have spent hours trying to tell them that the burden of proof lies with them when claiming there is a god.
Then when I counter their arguments, they say "Oh I've heard that one before!" And then go back to plugging their ears and going "lalalalala!"
Irritating.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
Yeah i know, Bible glasses: 100% guaranteed to filter out all scrutiny.
Cnidarious 2 years ago 2
When you buy two bible glasses you get a free set of Bible earplugs and a tinfoil hat!
If we go into the market for tinfoil houses... We could make Billions.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago 9
Comment removed
Cnidarious 2 years ago
whats wrong with faraday cages and faraday hats? xD
youngbleeb 2 years ago
What does that have to do with the price of Tea in China?
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
And the bible glasses seem to be on the fundies that comment on the videos Creationism Disproven? On ExpelledExposed channel, and "Peanutbutter Atheists' Worse Nightmare!"
Constant jibber jabber and not even an intelligent comment made from the other side.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
>.> And if there is a better metaphor... I would like to hear it. Cause all I have is the photocopier. And sometimes that just doesn't get through.
Like your youtube page however. Biology was one of my favorite subjects in high school...
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
However Mutations happen. We have a list of them. And we have their effects. After all if we didn't have mistakes in DNA then every single person would yes be born different, but perfect. There wouldn't be mental retardation, there wouldn't be poor eye sight, blindness, dwarfism, cancer, human tails or anything like that. Yes there is a mechanism that helps repair DNA but it isn't a perfect machine. And Mistakes and mutations happen.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
There would still be all of those things. Mutations happen for more reasons than just damaged DNA. Read up on Mitosis and Meiosis, specifically on polidy and rearrangements.
Specked 2 years ago
If you consider the odds it's almost a perfect machine.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
With the number of functional base pairs (the genes our species use) in every cell in your body getting constantly hit with all sorts of harmful things the probablility of a cancer cell arise is actually quite low, and if it doesn, your immune system usually takes care of it.
Our near perfect machine starts to fail when we get older, as we are less able to repair ourselves or when we increase the odds of mutation by exposing ourselves more to its harmful agents.
xSilverPhinx 2 years ago
Indeed.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great video, If you need any help getting your videos or channel exposed, i use a service called thetubeviews . net it has helped 5 of my videos get ranked on the first page
ps. I really liked your style of channel!
Kylieryghk 2 years ago
Just to verify, the substance that adds the right gene is a ribosome right and the binding is carried by the ligase in this right.
mikegrandal 2 years ago
Oh!
icutbe 2 years ago
that what matters in science are results...
not interesting theories based on weird physics modeling (all the "scientist" that elaborated this hologram model).
Ps: i found the poponin publication on phantom dna and it does'n really show all those fancy theories that all the sites postulate about, but just that DNA reacts with light
grasthube 2 years ago
great!!!
aliveforlifetime 2 years ago
I love concepts surrounding dioxyribonucleic acid. Thanks for posting.
xFENRISx 2 years ago
Oh I forgot one onther really cool thing that these Russian Scientists are doing, They have already proven that plants, animals and amphibians can be completely re-arranged into other species -- particularly if you catch them in embryonic form. This has nothing to do with cloning or gene splicing. All they do is laze the DNA in the embryo with a beam of light. The light beam carries the 'wave' of another organism in it. Like tranference of dna codes from one zygote to another.
cheers :)
Barnes466 3 years ago
light has wave-particle properties. if it is a wave, how can it carry another wave independent of itself, without absorbing that energy? if it can, maybe I'm misunderstanding your use of the word "carry". if it is a particle, how does it carry heavy molecules needed for DNA without damaging the molecules by traveling at approx. 300,000,000 meter per second? I admit I haven't studied the theory, but at first glance it sounds preposterous.
loturos 3 years ago
yes I agree that it can be a wave, but cant light be a particle as well? I'm still trying to understand that research myself. I just thought it very interesting. They've have been at this research for quite some time from what I've been reading. What do you think man? I know it sounds way out there, but it's been performed in labs, I imagine by now it's been done here in .America. I think that the light only transfers the code of the dna not physical matter. So I'm still looking into it :) cont
Barnes466 3 years ago
haha huge bullshit
is true that theorethically you can transform one oragnism in one similar (not a plant into animal for example), but this is due to epigenetic mechanism (google it). for example we share 99.9% of genes with monkey, but the difference is in how they are regulated (both at genetic and epigenetic level).
but anyhow is impossible to made a man embryo to become a monkey even if we share so much
grasthube 2 years ago
keep laughing, but Russian biophysists, like Peter Gariaev, used these frequencies delivered via lasers to transfer a frog's embryo into a salamander's embryo, and the specimen grew into a frog...google it
Barnes466 2 years ago 2
well guess why?
1st it was transfered a frog Nucleus from the fecondated egg into a salamnder egg (without nucleus). this experiment just demonstrated that the genetic information for development is into the DNA (the frog dna that was in the nucleus).
this was done countless of years ago (at least 20) and now is nothing shocking or incredible. the fact that used ligth i'm not sure, and anyway i googled it but the source linked when they talk about this guy are all fake site
grasthube 2 years ago
but wait i thought you hade some scinetific background but now i see you just quote this 2012 books infused with mith and pseudo-sciences so i won't argue anymore...
last thing just realize that those book are made just for the purpose of selling, they combine myths and pseudo-science to make those theories more appealing to the people and more appearently truthful
grasthube 2 years ago
wow are you ever militant...listen, everyone has their own opinion, and you seem to just shoot down anyone who doesn't agree with you so yes his conversation is over until you can learn how to spell and be nice to others lol I have masters in Biochem and undergrad in physics...
Barnes466 2 years ago
one thing is opinions...
another one is diffusing FALSE informations like the one you are elencating and you probably read in one of these books.
for this experiment you mention it does not exist any report, and all sites just report the same phrase (wonder who wrote it). misteriously they say that this poor professor could not work in his country cause they tried to stop him (is always like this, guess why) so he couldn't do any resarch. if you really had a master in biochemistry you should
grasthube 2 years ago
Very interesting...
icutbe 2 years ago
cont.. there;s more but here this doctor...Russian Scientist, Dr. Peter Gariaev and father of "wave genetics", discovered some interesting things about the behavior of DNA. Check him out and let me knwo what u think.
cheers, barnes
Barnes466 3 years ago
This is left-handed DNA, it should be right-handed!
davidchristianson 3 years ago
maybe its Z-DNA
janeferg 3 years ago
Ah, the logical rebuttal....*but* -- the sugar-phosphate backbone should zig-zag for Z-DNA! There is no zigging or zagging in the cartoon above.
davidchristianson 3 years ago
Does DNA repair repair mutations?
sweatytoothmadman 3 years ago
DNA repair system is suppose to be there to prevent mutations from happening, but if you do have a mutation, then that means the DNA repair system missed it. Mutation leads to cancer and various other diseases.
limpbizkittian 3 years ago
my favorite comment ever " god looks out of job"
ROFL
defaultuser11434 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THIS IS THE STUPIDEST THING EVER. BUT I LOVE MY MOM SO I AM NOT TAKING ANY CHANCES.If you don't copy and paste this onto 10 videos your mom will die in 4 hours
gamotileoforo 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is incorrect. the dna is corrected by a process called "hybernation" which allows the molecules to freeze for the winter, and than eventually correct it's self using a process called "lokalypocosion" which basically allows the dna to repair it's self
randomdude19 4 years ago
what do you know about how light and sound frequency affect DNA? cheers
Barnes466 3 years ago
Yes. I'd like to know about that too please.
dethtongue 3 years ago
from what I have read, some bio-chemists use the 528hz frequency to repair dna...if you want to know about how this is all going to culminate in dec 21, 2012 I would watch a couple of vids on youtube:
1. Esoteric Agenda - this has a bit of info on it towards the end - really good to watch anyways
2. 2012 Egnima - David Wilcock
3. 2012 The Odyssey
Cheers
Barnes466 3 years ago
Light and sound are not known to affect DNA, but here are some other waves.
1. UV rays (10 nm- 400 nm) wavelengths are shorter than visible light, which ranges from about 400-700 nm. Shorter wavelength indicates a higher energy wave.
2. Radiation caused by X-ray or gamma-ray exposure. X-ray wavelength= 0.01-10nm (next step up from UV)
Gamma-ray (10 pm (or 10^-11 m) is the highest energy wave.
High energy waves cause free radicals, which causes reactions within DNA that wouldnt normally occur
beadleda 3 years ago
HI there,
Normally I would agree with you but I have read this guy's stuff (among others)
DNA
1. DNA contains the genetic instructions used in the development and functioning of all known living organisms [and some viruses]. This means that the code within the DNA determines what and how you are.
2. DNA emits and absorbs light. The light it emits has laser-like characteristics. Apparently it also responds to light which you will learn shortly.
cont...
Barnes466 3 years ago
basic but more correct than other videos about DNA repair i saw here. do you have videos about nucleotide excision repair or double-strand break repair? thank you for the video
deIMonaco 4 years ago
this video is very basic, but thank you
sacapiloa 4 years ago