@Fr33domOfThought Oh and Building 7 caused billions of dollars of damage to the deutsche bank and other buildings were damaged as well within an acre radius. Unless the deutsche bank was standing in the foot print of Building 7 as it fell (lol) then Building 7 did NOT fall into it's own foot print. Thank you try again!
@theBartone9119 The bank was damaged because tons of material from building 7 crashed into it. That doesn't change the fact that WTC7 fell straight down. Watch the videos, it didn't tip at all, it didn't fall to the south, it fell straight down. You're fucking high if you think that happened naturally.
@mustbeburtreynolds You are a lunatic if you think it didn't happen naturally. Why the hell would it tip over? Newtons Law of Gravity says gravity forces things down? If you know of a gravity that pushes things to the side then please do share!
@theBartone9119 Yeah, things fall down, except when there's hundreds of fucking tons of steel and concrete in the way. That's when they fall to the side.
@Fr33domOfThought Thousands of hi-voltage transformers go off like grenades, and there was explosive material throughout the buildings -- propane & LPG tanks for restaurants & snack bars; O2 & NO3 tanks in medical/dental offices, oxyacetylene tanks in the maint. shops, and tens of thousands of gallons of diesel in generator tanks. All things in the WTC that will cause explosions when coming into contact with flames. You are living a day dream sucka!
Much of the evidence indicating that the US governemnt was directly responsible for 9/11 is mostly circumstancial and speculation. But this short video clip is DIRECT EVIDENCE that those buildings were in fact brought down by the use of EXPLOSIVES. These are not the sounds of cars or transformers exploding (give me a fucking break)...those are clearly the sounds of DEMOLITION CHARGES.
Nope, they are CLEARLY NOT since the explosions in a controlled demolition immediately precede the collapse, which didn't happen on 9/11...AND that there is no seismic data for any explosions before the collapse nor were any explosions anywhere as loud as a controlled demo explosion
Where's the evidence of a controlled demolition besides the weak Truther argument of "it looks like one"??
Got any REAL evidence? Nope, you're a Truther, you have no evidence
@CrazyRay7979 FFS!! I ain't in the mood to play patty cake with you pieces of shit. Go hump someone elses leg with your government propaganda bs. If I had it my way, all you fuckers spreading lies on here (defending those murderer's) would go to jail as well. FUCK OFF!!!!
It's so funny how you think that an explosion in the background wasn't one of the several things reported to be exploding cars, gas lines, electrical transformers, etc. and instead you're "so sure" that it was an explosive going off...too bad there were no signs of any kind of explosive being used and there is no seismic data to show explosions going off
@CrazyRay7979 Prove that it wasn't. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the firefighter describes the scene as "the city is exploding". I'll take his word over yours. Also, there are plenty of other vids that have these sounds in them, plenty of interviews you could read that have people explaining explosions, plenty of eye witnesses they said it looked like they were taking it down like they do buildings in vegas, bang bang bang bang, floor by floor. If this doesn't make you skeptical, you're hopeless
Listen carefully; things explode in fires...if you don't believe me, set your house on fire and listen to the explosions
An explosion does not mean a bomb went off
Someone saying, "I heard explosions" does not equate to "There were bombs going off", not in any way, shape, or form.
Someone saying something looked like a controlled demolition does not mean that it was, NOR does it even that they're saying that it was a controlled demolition...
@CrazyRay7979 Listen carefully, just because other things explode, doesn't mean there were not bombs planted in those buildings. Your argument is pretty weak, just because it can be other things, it can't be bombs? Hmmm... you sheep are very sheepish. ;)
There weren't bombs planted in the buildings because no evidence of explosives (which would be very obvious given the amount of TNT/RDX/etc.) was ever found...so "hmmm", it can't be bombs...and another Truther fails simple logic
@CrazyRay7979 Hahaha, your logic cracks me up. Since the media never told you there were bombs inside the buildings, even though many of them did, you don't believe there were bombs in the building. Hahaha, how pathetic.
I'm curious, how do you really think this isn't a "fail" for you? Hmmm? And yes, there is plenty of evidence explosives were used. They've found nano thermite in the dust, bro. You go ahead and keep your head in the sand though if it makes you feel better, you coward.
@CrazyRay7979 Not only this video here, but many other show the sounds of heavy explosives. You have people explaining the collpases sounding like the 4th of July over the East River.... come on. You have to be one brainwashed fuck to not believe these people. You also have to be a brainwashed fuck to not realize how all of those initial reports have all been swept under the carpet, and you have to dig for them.
It can't be bombs, because you can't see them? Haha, how logical.
@CrazyRay7979 Strange also that you can say there is no evidence of explosives, when the government never tested for explosives. FEMA was not even allowed to examine the steel. They were shown a select few girders. Seriously man, looking at some of the beams. Some bent all the way over almost without a single crack.
Do you realize the government still has no idea why the towers collapsed? Do you realize that? And you support these people.... again, you're a coward.
@CrazyRay7979 They were not given access to the entire building. Where are you getting your information from? As early as December 2001 and January 2002 ships were already reaching China and India to be melted down and recycled...
This area was a crime scene, and from the very beginning it was not treated like one. No care was taken to keep the rubble separate so that an in depth analysis of what caused the collapses could be done, the rubble was washed down before it left Ground Zero
@CrazyRay7979 If you're ok with a three month "investigation" where crews were allowed to test washed down, mixed together scraps of metal to find out what caused a collapse (they didn't find out by the way) then I say you're crazy. I don't understand how people like you can be so content with so little information.
I don't care what you say, three months is not enough time to properly test the three of the largest engineering disasters in history. They wasted no time shipping it overseas.
They should have kept it all just in case, years later, some people with agendas for attention and money decided to make up conspiracy theories, right?
You Truthers are deplorable, you act as if anyone has to cater to disproving your conspiracy theories...how about, first, attempting to prove ANY part of any conspiracy theory (aside from the fact that they contradict each other) to not be complete and total bullshit?
@theBartone9119 Hahahahaha your posts in that thread make you sound like nothing more than an angry child. Grow up and quit worrying about "truthers" and just look at the fucking facts. The Commission Report completely ignored WTC 7 until 2008. You're fucking delusional.
No, see how it works is YOU ANSWER...there is no "go to this website" crap in a debate/discussion
Not to mention that site is FILLED with WTC7 Truther conspiracy theories that have been disproven for YEARS...one of the first few pages of the WTC7 pages says that it fell in 6.5 seconds, FALSE, that's where I stopped...
P.S. That website is not "logical", not "accurate", and DEFINITELY NOT "unbiased"...you're insane if you think it's any of the three, it is a Truther website
The Truther website that you told me was "logical" and "unbiased" said WTC7 fell in 6.5 seconds...obviously you back that false theory or otherwise you wouldn't have posted the website and said it was accurate, logical, and unbiased...DO YOU KNOW HOW TO READ?
Too bad the building DID NOT FALL in 6.5 seconds, video and seismic data PROVES IT.
End of story, it is FACT that WTC7 did not fall in 6.5 seconds.
If you are unaware of this FACT then you need to study up and learn something about 9/11
@CrazyRay7979 On a side note... You have no right to comment, because you have a basic psychological problem that disallows you from objectively studying 9/11. You suffer from cognitive dissonance, because you can't believe in the first place that anyone in our government would ever attempt something like this.
U.S.S. Maine
Gulf of Tonkin Incident
Chief of Japan "8 Insults"
Operation Northwoods
Nothing more needs to be said. The U.S. government is the king of false flag operations.
Ah, the typical Truther "I think I'm better/smarter than you because I believe in conspiracies" response...as it is clearly obvious, you're an idiot; you posted a 9/11 Truther website with obvious bias and said it was logical and unbiased.
Where is YOUR ANSWER, you know, YOUR REPLY...in YOUR WORDS...like I said, the "Look at this website" response is NOT valid...neither is your most recent "Look at these conspiracies" response.
@CrazyRay7979 "Ah, the typical Truther "I think I'm better/smarter than you because I believe in conspiracies" response"
I'm not saying that at all. Why do morons like you always accuse everyone of this? I don't give a fuck how intelligent I am compared to you. I look at evidence and draw conclusions from logic and science.
You really think I give a quarter of a dog shit if I'm smarter than some random asshole on the internet? You don't even question your government, you fucking suck.
@CrazyRay7979 Basic world history shows obvious, compelling trends that our government would absolutely let something like this happen. All logic points towards it being an attack by Muslim extremists, that was allowed to occur under the Bush administration.
Research PNAC calling for a new Pearl Harbor. Research Bush's father calling for a New World Order thirty years ago. Google Operation Northwoods. You live in a fucking fantasy world if you think Bush or anyone else gives a fuck about you.
@CrazyRay7979 You refuse to do the research for yourself that would convince any normal fucking person with an IQ above 40 that this attack was allowed to happen because you don't like "twoofers". GROW UP YOU FUCKING CHILD - you're going to deny yourself rational, logical investigation of the truth because you don't like a group of people? How fucking ridiculous is that? Are you human?
Bush's administration was warned a thousand times. This has been proven several times. You are ignorant.
No, YOU ARE the one that won't do any research...hence your "look at this website" response.
It's not that I "don't like "twoofers"", it's that Truthers are the some of the most idiotic people on Earth. There is NO Truther conspiracy theory that has a cohesive, provable start to finish, NONE
The "Bush administration", where it should be CIA/FBI/etc. instead of Bush blame was not warned when and where...attacks are always possible
@CrazyRay7979 Just fucking google '9/11 warnings'. It is a raw, unbiased, inmanipulable fact that the Bush Administration was warned by at least French, British, Egyptian, Israeli, Russian, Moroccan, and Pakistani intelligence that they were expecting an imminent attack on U.S. cities using planes, probably by bin Laden or those close to him.
You are wrong. There is no bias or speculation to debate.
Your point is? Nobody said, "Hey, terrorists are going to hijack planes and fly them into the WTC".
P.S. Those same "French, British, Egyptian, Israeli, Russian, Moroccan, and Pakistani intelligence" are the ones that also reported that Saddam had WMDs
No, YOU ARE the one that won't do any research...hence your "look at this website" response.
It's not that I "don't like "twoofers"", it's that Truthers are the some of the most idiotic people on Earth. There is NO Truther conspiracy theory that has a cohesive, provable start to finish, NONE
The "Bush administration", where it should be CIA/FBI/etc. instead of Bush blame was not warned when and where...attacks are always possible
@CrazyRay7979 And for the record, the FBI, CIA, and similar agencies are agencies of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, of which the President is the ultimate superceding authority. They are ALL at the discretion of the President.
You don't even know what you're trying to argue. Fuck off.
36 different warnings dating back to NINETEEN NINETY FUCKING SEVEN. Our government knew this was coming. You're nothing less than willfully ignorant to believe otherwise.
...and you are aware that George Bush was only in office for 8 MONTHS of your supposed 14 years, aren't you??
...also interesting that you would state that they had warnings that terrorists WHILE stating that you think 9/11 was an inside job...see, you can't have it both ways, and that makes you an uneducated hypocrite
...also, I'm still waiting for you to prove me wrong
@CrazyRay7979 The supposed "terrorists" that "hate our freedom and values" were funded and propped up by the good ol' American government. We created Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. We made bin Laden into what he was; he was our Frankenstein.
I'm not saying it was a demolition job. The towers were 30 years old and covered in asbestos. I'm sure the planes did the job. All I'm saying is that Bush's administration simply let the attacks happen.
@CrazyRay7979 No, you aren't waiting for me to prove you wrong, because you're an arrogant, braindead narcissist who has already convinced himself that he's right.
No amount of facts will change your mind, because you are a mentally sterile buffoon who refuses to consider the evidence. I provide you with facts from reputable sources such as the U.S. gov't itself, and yet you simply disregard the evidence. You'd be a great case study for a psych experiment. Fucking worthless peon.
I've done plenty of research...whereas you "look at websites" made by Truthers and can't even see the illogical bias...there have been TONS of independent research in the past decade over 9/11, and all of the collective results PROVE that the Truthers are WRONG.
The Bush administration was NOT "warned a thousand times"...aside from it being a CIA/FBI/etc. issue and not a "Bush administration" one, there was no where, how, or when in any threat, so how would they guess?
we are watching such videos about 9/11 conspiracy but at the end nobody will do anything against this bastards, we will return to our normal life as sheeps in the brave new world ... määh
@samuraikid33 Absolutely. I just got into BNW and started watching some interview of Aldous... what a creepy fucking guy. Almost oddly satisfied with the corruption of our society... really soft-spoken, poignant guy, but fuckin creepy on some level.
The American Government knew the attack was going to happen, instead of stopping it they let it happen. They actually made money out of this attack. They put massive PUT OPTIONS on the stockmarket days before 9/11 predicting that the market would go down. It was also used as an excuse to go to war against Afghan and then Iraq so they could take over their Oil fields and all the other natural minerals there. This made trillions!
If there were NO other videos, this one would be enough. Our government says there were NO other explosive devices that day. This video proves otherwise. Just to have one bomb going off (and I know there were hundreds of others) proves the government is lying. Wake up people, stop being SHEEP!!!
@103ruggieri Your right...but theres nothing nobody can do. The powers that be are just that because nobody can do anything about it. Democracy doesnt exist anymore, just the illusion of it. By the way, I leave for boot camp for the Navy in 5 days...so at least I can make a mild contribution. Im serving not for the countries sake, but for my families. May not make any sense to you but it doesnt have to.
@CrazyRay7979 What do you expect them to do? Run around screaming like children? They look pretty nervous to me, man. And by the way, if you read all interviews they did with them after the fact, there are plenty of EMT's, police, and fire fighters (the ones that weren't murdered inside WTC2 shortly after they said they'd be able to knock it down with a couple of hoses) that say they heard explosions. Maybe you should stop fighting the evidence that's there in front of you, and start reading it.
Unfortunatly, i was there on the scene, and ive seen and heard a controlled demolition, theyre extremely loud, so loud that they can be heard from up to like 10 miles away. and the explosions begin WAY BEFORE the building begins to fall. all i heard that day was the loud crumbling of concrete, not boom after boom after boom then collapse
@artvandelay0 I've looked at that video and there are no squibs - just some falling debris, that happens do be smoking - watch the video several times and its obvious the camera caught a single event of some falling debris
@wkwickham There were squibs. You just don't want to see them for personal reasons, I guess. There was some kind of explosive material in the building, and molten steel found months after it happened.
I can point out the times on the video for you if you want on where there were explosions/squibs and windows being blown to bits. It's not that hard. Don't be afraid to question this shit, it's important for all of us to know.
@CTCADGUY I asked for something simple, any video with squibs including audio - and there are none - obvious desperation though - one guy sent me to a lame video showing some smoking/falling debris - what do you have?
Fake explosions, zensursula? Yes, sure, in real his mother was shouting from the other building, thatswhy he looked so frightened as if there would explode a bomb.
@Zensursula1 bullshit? so do you really believe that his mother was shouting from a buidling? or what is the reason why he looks so scared as if there would be a big explosion?
many people said that they heard explosions before the plane crash. are they all lieing? many videos where you can hear explosions. all faked? is that a big conspiracy? i think you are a big conspiracy theorist...
many facts approve that 3 buildings were blast on 911
@Kostafleer You should watch Aaron Russo. America to Fascism and then whatever you believe is what you believe but I can tell you that many Americans will not wake up because of the dumbing down of our society with reality tv and corny music on the airwaves that give subliminal messages to the brain. Peace be with you. Watch and lets discuss. The Bilderberg group is responsible for this and many other crimes.
but why doesnt bill maher believe this theory he is a VERY smart man and he always speaks agianst the government but not even he will say 9/11 was inside job. Yeah right. Fuck all you nut jobs. I guess we faked the moon landing too?!?!
Why not write "no such thing as the holocaust either, right?" or "why don't you go catch a bigfoot". Bill Maher, why do you think he is still on TV? He is just another Glenn Beck, Ann Coulter, he gets paid for toeing the company line. Learn the game, then maybe you can make an intelligent comment. Anyone on TV is part of the machine, why hasn't there been a proper debate on Global warming and 911? It's because the truth will come out. Half world feels 911 is a lie, same as GW. WHY no debate? DUH
okay, so what are listening to in the back ground? Why did FIREFIGHTERS report secondary explosions and devices?? Why witnesses reported this as well?? THEY WERE THERE Were you ?? And if it were explosions, why wasn't this mention about 9/11??
@demariojason 911 commission ignored the testimony and the press never touched it. Makes you see that the press is a Fed run propaganda machine that should not be believed. May as well be the USSA.
Thank you! The rest of the sheep wouldn't bother reading about the similarities between the two, they would rather soak up the mindless propaganda spewing from the mouths of the talking heads on Fox, CNN, MSNBC .
The whole fucking country is corrupt. America is a power hungry country. Our government IS MOST DEFINITELY capable of performing an act so cruel as this one. No one knows the exact cause of 911, there are many stories, but DO NOT THINK that we live in a perfect and gently world.
Any government is capable of doing this kind of shit. Here in Mexico our government tries to sell us the idea that they are fighting against the drug cartels, but we all know it's not true, that they are in league with them. In the meantime, countless innocents get caught in the middle of drug cartels shootings, while trying to get to work or picking up their kids at school. We get people that was either shot, raped, dismembered, dissolved in acid everyday. Corruption is everywhere you go sadly.
All too true ( ! ) and what seems to get missed even by the nine-one-one truthers is bush==oil/iraq,..so why Afgan is Stan wit-da-plan right now. Ostensible and Plausible is Osama-da-Bama is there but getz overlooked is that lotsadroga in Afganstan so MedicalPlan is Everybody in Recovery!!.. cuz its V.P.==Very Profitable but why Profits and Prophets when ( obviously ) dey don givashit??....
you people who think 9/11 was not a inside job are just too fucking stupit, you just refuse to wake up in the real america. are own people did this shit. WAKE UP!
lol. i laugh at you trying to looks intelligent and make a point when you CAN'T TYPE FEW SENTENCES IN YOUR NATIVE LANGUAGE WITHOUT MAKING SPELLING MISTAKES!
Look who the fuck is talking. you and your run on sentence.you forgot to put an a between type and few. lol, who is the one looking intelligent now? not you.
They need to get out of their ridiculous Disney World trance and actually LOOK AT THE CASE, but they won´t, and then they don´t understand we call them stupid idiots...
Or, it could have been something inside the building like a transformer, oxygen or acetylene gas tank, diesel fuel cells or big compressed air tanks that make one hell of a boom when damaged and or on fire.
But yea, cordite sounds like a more logical answer... wow, just... wow.
Sir, you are the first person I have ever seen who has actually acknowledged that their are other things inside buildings that explode (regarding 911 conspiracies).
I'm sure all of those explosive items such as the diesel for the generators and such were kept in sub levels of the towers. If you look in other videos there a small flashes in the higher floors possible from explosive devices such as cordite.
See, here's where you messed up... by saying "you're sure" that diesel fuel cells were stored in lower levels, and not knowing for certain where they are, but you are somehow sure cordite was used?
What about all the other things that did through out all levels of the buildings? Like big transformers, compressed air tanks, compressed gas tanks, etc etc...
Cordite my dying ass. Cordite is an obsolete small arms propellant, and any asshat who calls it a supersonic explosive is an idiot running a scam to make himself look like an expert. I fire cordite-loaded ammo all the time in my No. 1 MkIII* Enfield (.303 Brit) and it is a lot softer than the nitro cellulose in my 7.62X54R Mosin Nagant.
So... why an explosion AFTER the building's already fallen? Notice all the dust and debris, it's quite obvious the buildings already fell, why would there be an explosion after, and why is this the only video of that explosion? With all the cameras at ground zero you'd think that one would have picked up this explosion.
As for flashes of light, how many thousands of windows do you think are in those buildings? Did you know glass will cause flashes of light when light hits them a certain way? Yeah, they like to call that glare. Get a f@#$ing education.
People must be retarded to wander why there were explosions and flashes of light. two commercial airliners traveling at 500 miles an hour crash into the two largest buildings in the us full of jet fuel which will will obviously ignite every other combustible item in the buldings and causing huge floors to collapse on themselves as they fall. What do people think it will sound like? Two butterflies fighting?
Every country, including many that don't admire the U.S., has a community of architects, structural engineers, civil engineers, etc. Each member has access to more information (and understands it better, and has tools to analyze it) than the conspiracy believers.
ANY of those engineers or scientists could have published a contradiction to the "official" explanation, and if it is peer-reviewed in one of the scholarly journals that author would be famous forever.
Their reaction does not look to me at all like that which I would expect of a man who had heard an explosion. Only the man with the thing on his face seems to react and he is looking where one of the fire fighters was approaching. More typical of the reaction to motion than to an explosion of that magnitude thaqt close. There were, of course, explosions in various places due to burning cars. So, either way, this is proof of bugger-all.
lefty... I personally know a firefighter that was there... his whole dept knows its an inside job... And by the way 1000F is far from the 3,000F needed to melt steel... So no you fail
dumbass, the steel didn't need to "melt" and nobody claims it did (other than the twoooooofers). 1000f is a temp at which steel loses about 50% of its strength, at which point the buildings fail. no magical fireproof explosives needed.
Sadly, as every other example of a steel framed building that has been on fire prooves, this simply does not happen. Windsor building in Madrid is a good example. WTC7 could have burnt until nothing was left but steel, it would still not have collapsed.
What is the Windsor building a good example of? The portion that was on fire was completely destroyed by collapse. The only reason the whole building didn't collapse was its solid concrete core, and 2 solid concrete dividers the height of 2 floors 1/3 and 2/3 of the way up the building...
WTC had a big massive concrete core too, by the way... WTC had only burns in 5 to 6 floors, the windsor building was burned completely (well over 75%), impossible that the WTC has collaped by only those fires
Look at what the steel framing did in that fire. The concrete core is what saved the building. Had the building been like the WTCs it would have been totally collapsed.
You're full of shit. I have seen aluminum melt in an open air jet fuel fire.
And steel does not have to melt to fail. If you heat it until it expands enough it will break joints. The building then falls down. If some of the joints were already broken by the impact of multi-ton projectiles, it takes far less energy of any sort to bring on global failure.
You obviously know bugger all about explosives. There is no indication anywhere of high explosive detonations. There was a deflagration of jet fuel. There was structural failure. Never was there one indication of high exlosive detonations in either of the towers nor in WTC 7. There was not even a sound of explosions before the towers started to fall.
You should watch again the video of that day so you may change your mind. Eyewitness, reporters, firefighter and policemen reported about explosions. Open your eyes.
There were secondary explosions, to be sure. There were a lot of cars burning in the streets. They tend to explode, left unattended.
What Schroeder and Cacchioli report as explsoions were actually a single event which they heard but did not witness because they were inside. Note that they do not describe the collapse of the south tower. That was their horrendous explosion.
Yes, in all the official versions there were no explosions reported but we heard explosion in some videos and the most important thing are the eyewitness, they reported about explosion, huge, large, big, tremendous explosion, But for the government, simple, they don't exist.
Schroeder and Cacchioli reported explosions, insist that they were bombs. These occurred while they were inside the building and not looking out the windows. Notice that neither of them can describe the moment that the south tower collapsed. Their "huge explosion" was actually the collapse of the south tower. The second strike was even described in the first radio traffic as an explosion.
Crazy stuff i wonder what else could have caused that explosion besides planted explosives?
philyB08 2 months ago
@Fr33domOfThought Oh and Building 7 caused billions of dollars of damage to the deutsche bank and other buildings were damaged as well within an acre radius. Unless the deutsche bank was standing in the foot print of Building 7 as it fell (lol) then Building 7 did NOT fall into it's own foot print. Thank you try again!
theBartone9119 5 months ago
@theBartone9119 The bank was damaged because tons of material from building 7 crashed into it. That doesn't change the fact that WTC7 fell straight down. Watch the videos, it didn't tip at all, it didn't fall to the south, it fell straight down. You're fucking high if you think that happened naturally.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds You are a lunatic if you think it didn't happen naturally. Why the hell would it tip over? Newtons Law of Gravity says gravity forces things down? If you know of a gravity that pushes things to the side then please do share!
theBartone9119 4 months ago
@theBartone9119 Yeah, things fall down, except when there's hundreds of fucking tons of steel and concrete in the way. That's when they fall to the side.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Fr33domOfThought Thousands of hi-voltage transformers go off like grenades, and there was explosive material throughout the buildings -- propane & LPG tanks for restaurants & snack bars; O2 & NO3 tanks in medical/dental offices, oxyacetylene tanks in the maint. shops, and tens of thousands of gallons of diesel in generator tanks. All things in the WTC that will cause explosions when coming into contact with flames. You are living a day dream sucka!
theBartone9119 5 months ago
google: Explosions as firefighters tackle fire at Falmouth Docks
"Then there was some massive, massive explosions and we saw a big raging fire on top of these canisters," he told the BBC"
google: Winter Haven Fire Claims 3 Homes
"We ran out of water, we waited for more water. Then started attacking the explosions... We have multiple explosions..."
Explosions are COMMON with building fires, big ones too. So to think they must be due to a controlled demolition, is RETARDED.
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
Hearing a loud bang is not proof
metalebd 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@metalebd It is if your a conspiracy nut!
kushsmokkeralt 7 months ago
Yet so many STUPID 911 debunkers still claim we're conspiracy nuts. To all the 911 debunkers: Here's the proof you dumb Sheep!!!
jabe55 9 months ago
Much of the evidence indicating that the US governemnt was directly responsible for 9/11 is mostly circumstancial and speculation. But this short video clip is DIRECT EVIDENCE that those buildings were in fact brought down by the use of EXPLOSIVES. These are not the sounds of cars or transformers exploding (give me a fucking break)...those are clearly the sounds of DEMOLITION CHARGES.
ipsofacto297 9 months ago
@ipsofacto297
Nope, they are CLEARLY NOT since the explosions in a controlled demolition immediately precede the collapse, which didn't happen on 9/11...AND that there is no seismic data for any explosions before the collapse nor were any explosions anywhere as loud as a controlled demo explosion
Where's the evidence of a controlled demolition besides the weak Truther argument of "it looks like one"??
Got any REAL evidence? Nope, you're a Truther, you have no evidence
CrazyRay7979 9 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 FFS!! I ain't in the mood to play patty cake with you pieces of shit. Go hump someone elses leg with your government propaganda bs. If I had it my way, all you fuckers spreading lies on here (defending those murderer's) would go to jail as well. FUCK OFF!!!!
ipsofacto297 9 months ago
Challenge for Truthers:
Prove that the explosion heard was from a bomb
It's so funny how you think that an explosion in the background wasn't one of the several things reported to be exploding cars, gas lines, electrical transformers, etc. and instead you're "so sure" that it was an explosive going off...too bad there were no signs of any kind of explosive being used and there is no seismic data to show explosions going off
CrazyRay7979 10 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 Prove that it wasn't. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the firefighter describes the scene as "the city is exploding". I'll take his word over yours. Also, there are plenty of other vids that have these sounds in them, plenty of interviews you could read that have people explaining explosions, plenty of eye witnesses they said it looked like they were taking it down like they do buildings in vegas, bang bang bang bang, floor by floor. If this doesn't make you skeptical, you're hopeless
bweazel 9 months ago
@bweazel
Listen carefully; things explode in fires...if you don't believe me, set your house on fire and listen to the explosions
An explosion does not mean a bomb went off
Someone saying, "I heard explosions" does not equate to "There were bombs going off", not in any way, shape, or form.
Someone saying something looked like a controlled demolition does not mean that it was, NOR does it even that they're saying that it was a controlled demolition...
...you Truthers are very ignorant
CrazyRay7979 9 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 Listen carefully, just because other things explode, doesn't mean there were not bombs planted in those buildings. Your argument is pretty weak, just because it can be other things, it can't be bombs? Hmmm... you sheep are very sheepish. ;)
bweazel 9 months ago
@bweazel
There weren't bombs planted in the buildings because no evidence of explosives (which would be very obvious given the amount of TNT/RDX/etc.) was ever found...so "hmmm", it can't be bombs...and another Truther fails simple logic
CrazyRay7979 9 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 Hahaha, your logic cracks me up. Since the media never told you there were bombs inside the buildings, even though many of them did, you don't believe there were bombs in the building. Hahaha, how pathetic.
I'm curious, how do you really think this isn't a "fail" for you? Hmmm? And yes, there is plenty of evidence explosives were used. They've found nano thermite in the dust, bro. You go ahead and keep your head in the sand though if it makes you feel better, you coward.
bweazel 9 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 Not only this video here, but many other show the sounds of heavy explosives. You have people explaining the collpases sounding like the 4th of July over the East River.... come on. You have to be one brainwashed fuck to not believe these people. You also have to be a brainwashed fuck to not realize how all of those initial reports have all been swept under the carpet, and you have to dig for them.
It can't be bombs, because you can't see them? Haha, how logical.
bweazel 9 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 Strange also that you can say there is no evidence of explosives, when the government never tested for explosives. FEMA was not even allowed to examine the steel. They were shown a select few girders. Seriously man, looking at some of the beams. Some bent all the way over almost without a single crack.
Do you realize the government still has no idea why the towers collapsed? Do you realize that? And you support these people.... again, you're a coward.
bweazel 9 months ago
@bweazel
There was plenty of time to examine the steel...where do you get your bullshit from?
You're trying to defend your "point" with 100% false information, but hey, that's what all Truthers do
CrazyRay7979 9 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 They were not given access to the entire building. Where are you getting your information from? As early as December 2001 and January 2002 ships were already reaching China and India to be melted down and recycled...
This area was a crime scene, and from the very beginning it was not treated like one. No care was taken to keep the rubble separate so that an in depth analysis of what caused the collapses could be done, the rubble was washed down before it left Ground Zero
bweazel 9 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 If you're ok with a three month "investigation" where crews were allowed to test washed down, mixed together scraps of metal to find out what caused a collapse (they didn't find out by the way) then I say you're crazy. I don't understand how people like you can be so content with so little information.
I don't care what you say, three months is not enough time to properly test the three of the largest engineering disasters in history. They wasted no time shipping it overseas.
bweazel 9 months ago
@bweazel
They should have kept it all just in case, years later, some people with agendas for attention and money decided to make up conspiracy theories, right?
You Truthers are deplorable, you act as if anyone has to cater to disproving your conspiracy theories...how about, first, attempting to prove ANY part of any conspiracy theory (aside from the fact that they contradict each other) to not be complete and total bullshit?
CrazyRay7979 9 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 911research.wtc7.net
Read through this website. It is probably the most logical, accurate, unbiased, realistic site you will find on the matter.
You can't lump different theories together as if they're supposed to all be true. Of course the idea that there weren't planes is retarded.
But you not realizing that this is Operation Northwoods forty years in the making is equally retarded.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds False. Google: "Bridging the Gap Building 7 Club Conspiracy"
I wrote a whole piece on Building 7 and dissected that website to shreds (just scroll down near the bottom).
theBartone9119 4 months ago
@theBartone9119 Hahahahaha your posts in that thread make you sound like nothing more than an angry child. Grow up and quit worrying about "truthers" and just look at the fucking facts. The Commission Report completely ignored WTC 7 until 2008. You're fucking delusional.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds
No, see how it works is YOU ANSWER...there is no "go to this website" crap in a debate/discussion
Not to mention that site is FILLED with WTC7 Truther conspiracy theories that have been disproven for YEARS...one of the first few pages of the WTC7 pages says that it fell in 6.5 seconds, FALSE, that's where I stopped...
P.S. That website is not "logical", not "accurate", and DEFINITELY NOT "unbiased"...you're insane if you think it's any of the three, it is a Truther website
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 It said in 6.5 seconds the TOP OF THE BUILDING WAS ENGULFED IN DUST.
Do you even know how to read?
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
Comment removed
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
The Truther website that you told me was "logical" and "unbiased" said WTC7 fell in 6.5 seconds...obviously you back that false theory or otherwise you wouldn't have posted the website and said it was accurate, logical, and unbiased...DO YOU KNOW HOW TO READ?
Too bad the building DID NOT FALL in 6.5 seconds, video and seismic data PROVES IT.
End of story, it is FACT that WTC7 did not fall in 6.5 seconds.
If you are unaware of this FACT then you need to study up and learn something about 9/11
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 On a side note... You have no right to comment, because you have a basic psychological problem that disallows you from objectively studying 9/11. You suffer from cognitive dissonance, because you can't believe in the first place that anyone in our government would ever attempt something like this.
U.S.S. Maine
Gulf of Tonkin Incident
Chief of Japan "8 Insults"
Operation Northwoods
Nothing more needs to be said. The U.S. government is the king of false flag operations.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds
Ah, the typical Truther "I think I'm better/smarter than you because I believe in conspiracies" response...as it is clearly obvious, you're an idiot; you posted a 9/11 Truther website with obvious bias and said it was logical and unbiased.
Where is YOUR ANSWER, you know, YOUR REPLY...in YOUR WORDS...like I said, the "Look at this website" response is NOT valid...neither is your most recent "Look at these conspiracies" response.
9/11 wasn't an inside job, get a clue!
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 "Ah, the typical Truther "I think I'm better/smarter than you because I believe in conspiracies" response"
I'm not saying that at all. Why do morons like you always accuse everyone of this? I don't give a fuck how intelligent I am compared to you. I look at evidence and draw conclusions from logic and science.
You really think I give a quarter of a dog shit if I'm smarter than some random asshole on the internet? You don't even question your government, you fucking suck.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds
Because that's how you Truthers talk, as if you have some enlightened insight because you compare 9/11 to other proven and unproven conspiracies.
Nothing ever brought up by Truthers about 9/11 has ever been proven.
PROVE ME WRONG
Why do you continue to ignore my requests to counter my original statement which you originally replied to??
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 Basic world history shows obvious, compelling trends that our government would absolutely let something like this happen. All logic points towards it being an attack by Muslim extremists, that was allowed to occur under the Bush administration.
Research PNAC calling for a new Pearl Harbor. Research Bush's father calling for a New World Order thirty years ago. Google Operation Northwoods. You live in a fucking fantasy world if you think Bush or anyone else gives a fuck about you.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 You refuse to do the research for yourself that would convince any normal fucking person with an IQ above 40 that this attack was allowed to happen because you don't like "twoofers". GROW UP YOU FUCKING CHILD - you're going to deny yourself rational, logical investigation of the truth because you don't like a group of people? How fucking ridiculous is that? Are you human?
Bush's administration was warned a thousand times. This has been proven several times. You are ignorant.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds
No, YOU ARE the one that won't do any research...hence your "look at this website" response.
It's not that I "don't like "twoofers"", it's that Truthers are the some of the most idiotic people on Earth. There is NO Truther conspiracy theory that has a cohesive, provable start to finish, NONE
The "Bush administration", where it should be CIA/FBI/etc. instead of Bush blame was not warned when and where...attacks are always possible
REPLY TO MY COMMENTS
TRY TO PROVE ME WRONG
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 Just fucking google '9/11 warnings'. It is a raw, unbiased, inmanipulable fact that the Bush Administration was warned by at least French, British, Egyptian, Israeli, Russian, Moroccan, and Pakistani intelligence that they were expecting an imminent attack on U.S. cities using planes, probably by bin Laden or those close to him.
You are wrong. There is no bias or speculation to debate.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mustbeburtreynolds
Your point is? Nobody said, "Hey, terrorists are going to hijack planes and fly them into the WTC".
P.S. Those same "French, British, Egyptian, Israeli, Russian, Moroccan, and Pakistani intelligence" are the ones that also reported that Saddam had WMDs
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds
No, YOU ARE the one that won't do any research...hence your "look at this website" response.
It's not that I "don't like "twoofers"", it's that Truthers are the some of the most idiotic people on Earth. There is NO Truther conspiracy theory that has a cohesive, provable start to finish, NONE
The "Bush administration", where it should be CIA/FBI/etc. instead of Bush blame was not warned when and where...attacks are always possible
REPLY TO MY COMMENTS
TRY TO PROVE ME WRONG
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 And for the record, the FBI, CIA, and similar agencies are agencies of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, of which the President is the ultimate superceding authority. They are ALL at the discretion of the President.
You don't even know what you're trying to argue. Fuck off.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds
No shit, but THEY ARE the ones that are supposed to do the research and work and REPORT it to the Executive Branch...that is why they exist
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 villagevoicedotcom/2003-08-05/news/bush-s-9-11-secrets/
36 different warnings dating back to NINETEEN NINETY FUCKING SEVEN. Our government knew this was coming. You're nothing less than willfully ignorant to believe otherwise.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds
Riiiight Truther Boy...
...and you are aware that George Bush was only in office for 8 MONTHS of your supposed 14 years, aren't you??
...also interesting that you would state that they had warnings that terrorists WHILE stating that you think 9/11 was an inside job...see, you can't have it both ways, and that makes you an uneducated hypocrite
...also, I'm still waiting for you to prove me wrong
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 The supposed "terrorists" that "hate our freedom and values" were funded and propped up by the good ol' American government. We created Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. We made bin Laden into what he was; he was our Frankenstein.
I'm not saying it was a demolition job. The towers were 30 years old and covered in asbestos. I'm sure the planes did the job. All I'm saying is that Bush's administration simply let the attacks happen.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 No, you aren't waiting for me to prove you wrong, because you're an arrogant, braindead narcissist who has already convinced himself that he's right.
No amount of facts will change your mind, because you are a mentally sterile buffoon who refuses to consider the evidence. I provide you with facts from reputable sources such as the U.S. gov't itself, and yet you simply disregard the evidence. You'd be a great case study for a psych experiment. Fucking worthless peon.
mustbeburtreynolds 4 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds
You DON"T HAVE facts...Truthers have no facts, ever!
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds
You DON"T HAVE facts...Truthers have no facts, ever!
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 Mother of god, he's falling apart...
mustbeburtreynolds 3 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds
I've done plenty of research...whereas you "look at websites" made by Truthers and can't even see the illogical bias...there have been TONS of independent research in the past decade over 9/11, and all of the collective results PROVE that the Truthers are WRONG.
The Bush administration was NOT "warned a thousand times"...aside from it being a CIA/FBI/etc. issue and not a "Bush administration" one, there was no where, how, or when in any threat, so how would they guess?
CrazyRay7979 4 months ago
we are watching such videos about 9/11 conspiracy but at the end nobody will do anything against this bastards, we will return to our normal life as sheeps in the brave new world ... määh
samuraikid33 10 months ago
@samuraikid33 You read Huxley?
mustbeburtreynolds 3 months ago
@mustbeburtreynolds yes and in my opinion this fictional dystopia becomes more and more true
samuraikid33 3 months ago
@samuraikid33 Absolutely. I just got into BNW and started watching some interview of Aldous... what a creepy fucking guy. Almost oddly satisfied with the corruption of our society... really soft-spoken, poignant guy, but fuckin creepy on some level.
mustbeburtreynolds 3 months ago
They will pay
aadrianlee 11 months ago
The American Government knew the attack was going to happen, instead of stopping it they let it happen. They actually made money out of this attack. They put massive PUT OPTIONS on the stockmarket days before 9/11 predicting that the market would go down. It was also used as an excuse to go to war against Afghan and then Iraq so they could take over their Oil fields and all the other natural minerals there. This made trillions!
john020884 11 months ago
@john020884
Yet "they" still haven't taken any of their oil, and haven't made trillions. Who are "they" by the way?
...so tell me, how does your bullshit scenario work now?
CrazyRay7979 10 months ago
Comment removed
john020884 11 months ago
Fake....? Duh
ahhhhmazing1 11 months ago
If there were NO other videos, this one would be enough. Our government says there were NO other explosive devices that day. This video proves otherwise. Just to have one bomb going off (and I know there were hundreds of others) proves the government is lying. Wake up people, stop being SHEEP!!!
deuce01983 1 year ago
@deuce01983
And what are you doing about it? Comment on the video and go back to your normal life?
That makes you a sheep.
103ruggieri 1 year ago
@103ruggieri Your right...but theres nothing nobody can do. The powers that be are just that because nobody can do anything about it. Democracy doesnt exist anymore, just the illusion of it. By the way, I leave for boot camp for the Navy in 5 days...so at least I can make a mild contribution. Im serving not for the countries sake, but for my families. May not make any sense to you but it doesnt have to.
deuce01983 1 year ago
@deuce01983
You hear an explosion and you think it was a bomb?
Where's your proof that it is an explosive going off? You have none
The fact the the firefighters do not panic shows that they know there are things exploding due to the fires
CrazyRay7979 10 months ago
@CrazyRay7979 What do you expect them to do? Run around screaming like children? They look pretty nervous to me, man. And by the way, if you read all interviews they did with them after the fact, there are plenty of EMT's, police, and fire fighters (the ones that weren't murdered inside WTC2 shortly after they said they'd be able to knock it down with a couple of hoses) that say they heard explosions. Maybe you should stop fighting the evidence that's there in front of you, and start reading it.
bweazel 9 months ago
Unfortunatly, i was there on the scene, and ive seen and heard a controlled demolition, theyre extremely loud, so loud that they can be heard from up to like 10 miles away. and the explosions begin WAY BEFORE the building begins to fall. all i heard that day was the loud crumbling of concrete, not boom after boom after boom then collapse
cchevali 1 year ago
Wow. Now it's proven bombs were used on 911! A goldmine of evidence here.
artvandelay0 1 year ago
noinsidejob - this is the truth
informationsagent 1 year ago
watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I&feature=related
SnaggaSheeYoung 1 year ago
watch?v=_MRSr1MnFuk
wkwickham 1 year ago
North Tower - Visible detonations
Nightverslonn 1 year ago
lol - ummm an explosion after the bldgs fell?
so?
wkwickham 1 year ago
does anybody know if this footage was aired on national TV
MaxMyrmyr 1 year ago
@MaxMyrmyr It was on the Naudet Brothers film. Not sure if they syndicated it or not.
artvandelay0 1 year ago
Government knew about Corrosion inside T_win T_owers and had to Fast-Track their
de-commissioning by 2007. NYC council forbid C_ontrolled D_emolition and the people who tendered the
corrosion and de-commissioning research have destroyed all their files and had people sign
forms saying they will never talk about this as per Thomas-Scott Gordon 1989
Search Thomas Gordon and corrosion of the T_win T_owers
vv vv vv dot 911oz dot c om and search Thomas Scott Gordon
blavatsky3 1 year ago
@BigRedBB Who are "they",and who are your people?
HUSKY57887 1 year ago
who believe that it is still not inside job
Nobody !!!
TheDelta40886 1 year ago
@TheDelta40886 lol - who has even the tiniest proof that it was an inside job?
Nobody!!!
wkwickham 1 year ago
@wkwickham LoL you must be mentally challenged, how about look to the right of the screen and you will see about 15 videos with proof :D
xInfamous187x 1 year ago
@xInfamous187x hmmm no, there isn't one video ANYWHERE that shows the towers falling with squibs - no audio of any explosives - not one!
list one specifically by watch# - I'm all ears!
wkwickham 1 year ago
@wkwickham hey dude what vids have u been watching, ALL the wtc collapse vids show squibs, smoke and flashes, all of them!
wellifthemediasaysit 1 year ago
@wellifthemediasaysit post a link - I'd love to see it
wkwickham 1 year ago
@wkwickham a vid called 9/11/01: North Tower - Visible detonations might help. Shows some squibs and what looks like thermatic reactions. IDK.
artvandelay0 1 year ago
@artvandelay0 I've looked at that video and there are no squibs - just some falling debris, that happens do be smoking - watch the video several times and its obvious the camera caught a single event of some falling debris
again - still no video of squibs or any audio
wkwickham 1 year ago
@wkwickham There were squibs. You just don't want to see them for personal reasons, I guess. There was some kind of explosive material in the building, and molten steel found months after it happened.
I can point out the times on the video for you if you want on where there were explosions/squibs and windows being blown to bits. It's not that hard. Don't be afraid to question this shit, it's important for all of us to know.
artvandelay0 1 year ago
@wkwickham Are you blind?
CTCADGUY 1 year ago
@CTCADGUY I asked for something simple, any video with squibs including audio - and there are none - obvious desperation though - one guy sent me to a lame video showing some smoking/falling debris - what do you have?
wkwickham 1 year ago
Comment removed
artvandelay0 1 year ago
Whats that sound? Larry PULLED the building!
TheChegis 1 year ago
I like this. :)
laurenchambers49 1 year ago
Fake explosions lol
Zensursula1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fake explosions, zensursula? Yes, sure, in real his mother was shouting from the other building, thatswhy he looked so frightened as if there would explode a bomb.
Be real, 911 was an inside job!!
Thats only one proof of many others!
Kostafleer 1 year ago
@Kostafleer
bullshit 9/11 no inside job
Zensursula1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Zensursula1 bullshit? so do you really believe that his mother was shouting from a buidling? or what is the reason why he looks so scared as if there would be a big explosion?
many people said that they heard explosions before the plane crash. are they all lieing? many videos where you can hear explosions. all faked? is that a big conspiracy? i think you are a big conspiracy theorist...
many facts approve that 3 buildings were blast on 911
Kostafleer 1 year ago
@Kostafleer You should watch Aaron Russo. America to Fascism and then whatever you believe is what you believe but I can tell you that many Americans will not wake up because of the dumbing down of our society with reality tv and corny music on the airwaves that give subliminal messages to the brain. Peace be with you. Watch and lets discuss. The Bilderberg group is responsible for this and many other crimes.
MonetteProductions 1 year ago
WELL, that pretty much proves that there were bombs somewhere in that area. I knew it was a lie.
artvandelay0 1 year ago
but why doesnt bill maher believe this theory he is a VERY smart man and he always speaks agianst the government but not even he will say 9/11 was inside job. Yeah right. Fuck all you nut jobs. I guess we faked the moon landing too?!?!
tonyrosam 1 year ago
Why not write "no such thing as the holocaust either, right?" or "why don't you go catch a bigfoot". Bill Maher, why do you think he is still on TV? He is just another Glenn Beck, Ann Coulter, he gets paid for toeing the company line. Learn the game, then maybe you can make an intelligent comment. Anyone on TV is part of the machine, why hasn't there been a proper debate on Global warming and 911? It's because the truth will come out. Half world feels 911 is a lie, same as GW. WHY no debate? DUH
blite13 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 insidejob !!
WTC1, WTC2, and WTC 7 is demolition with bombs.
Missile hit the pentagon and the wtc towers.
NO PLANE..
spielverderber9 1 year ago
You are a silly idiot!
Zensursula1 1 year ago
The sound of an inside job in progress .....
ZED74 1 year ago
I got a question, that probaly will have my comment the most thumbed up!
Heres one for you nonbelievers of secondary devices bringing down the WTCs: DO YOU STILL BELIEVE THAT NO EXPLOSIVES WERE INVOLVED!?!?!?
demariojason 1 year ago
9/11 no inside job
spieleverderber9 1 year ago
okay, so what are listening to in the back ground? Why did FIREFIGHTERS report secondary explosions and devices?? Why witnesses reported this as well?? THEY WERE THERE Were you ?? And if it were explosions, why wasn't this mention about 9/11??
demariojason 1 year ago 2
@demariojason 911 commission ignored the testimony and the press never touched it. Makes you see that the press is a Fed run propaganda machine that should not be believed. May as well be the USSA.
blite13 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that was controled demolition inc!
WE NEED TRUTH!!!
AND WE CAN HEAR THE TRUTH!!!
Kostafleer 1 year ago 7
You can hear a fake!
Zensursula1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
explosions everywhere. people were thrown on floors, against walls, etc... pull it larry, pull it.
whodoweshoot 1 year ago 4
its not fake
MrL1ttledude 2 years ago 3
yikes...
JRodFilms 2 years ago
... it's necesary to say fake?
yes, fake..
why people make fun of this?
mrwind89 2 years ago
Everybody that thinks governments are not in state to perform such horrible acts should read about "OPERATION NORTHWOODS"
Dutchforce14 2 years ago 6
Thank you! The rest of the sheep wouldn't bother reading about the similarities between the two, they would rather soak up the mindless propaganda spewing from the mouths of the talking heads on Fox, CNN, MSNBC .
willymateu 2 years ago 3
This is just absolutely incredible. There's your evidence right there!
artvandelay0 2 years ago 3
The whole fucking country is corrupt. America is a power hungry country. Our government IS MOST DEFINITELY capable of performing an act so cruel as this one. No one knows the exact cause of 911, there are many stories, but DO NOT THINK that we live in a perfect and gently world.
806TO713 2 years ago 43
Any government is capable of doing this kind of shit. Here in Mexico our government tries to sell us the idea that they are fighting against the drug cartels, but we all know it's not true, that they are in league with them. In the meantime, countless innocents get caught in the middle of drug cartels shootings, while trying to get to work or picking up their kids at school. We get people that was either shot, raped, dismembered, dissolved in acid everyday. Corruption is everywhere you go sadly.
0oRevano0 2 years ago 6
All too true ( ! ) and what seems to get missed even by the nine-one-one truthers is bush==oil/iraq,..so why Afgan is Stan wit-da-plan right now. Ostensible and Plausible is Osama-da-Bama is there but getz overlooked is that lotsadroga in Afganstan so MedicalPlan is Everybody in Recovery!!.. cuz its V.P.==Very Profitable but why Profits and Prophets when ( obviously ) dey don givashit??....
pzmtuthcvpvl 2 years ago
@806TO713 Finally,someone on You Tube who agrees.
HUSKY57887 1 year ago
inside job
buckfush187 2 years ago 4
you people who think 9/11 was not a inside job are just too fucking stupit, you just refuse to wake up in the real america. are own people did this shit. WAKE UP!
today211 2 years ago 2
lol. i laugh at you trying to looks intelligent and make a point when you CAN'T TYPE FEW SENTENCES IN YOUR NATIVE LANGUAGE WITHOUT MAKING SPELLING MISTAKES!
yamimakaiz 2 years ago
Look who the fuck is talking. you and your run on sentence.you forgot to put an a between type and few. lol, who is the one looking intelligent now? not you.
today211 2 years ago 3
english is my 2nd language. you are from USA. and i wasn't calling other people 'stupit' i was just making fun of you
yamimakaiz 2 years ago
people like u fill every1s heads with shit just so u feel important
bubzzy17 2 years ago
They need to get out of their ridiculous Disney World trance and actually LOOK AT THE CASE, but they won´t, and then they don´t understand we call them stupid idiots...
alienspacecentereast 2 years ago 4
inside job
today211 2 years ago 2
What exactly does this video prove? It was shot at 10:15 am.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
Isn't that around the time was flight 93 said to go down?
gavinonymous 2 years ago
yeah, but flight 93 crashed in pennsylvannia.
IDkMyyyBFFJilll 2 years ago 3
Sounded like a very fast supersonic explosive to me. Can you say c-o-r-d-i-t-e?
delicato024 3 years ago
Or, it could have been something inside the building like a transformer, oxygen or acetylene gas tank, diesel fuel cells or big compressed air tanks that make one hell of a boom when damaged and or on fire.
But yea, cordite sounds like a more logical answer... wow, just... wow.
fengineer08 3 years ago
Indeed all of those are logical and possible...I'm sure we both could dispute them all along with cordite.
although, wow is right :/
delicato024 3 years ago
Sir, you are the first person I have ever seen who has actually acknowledged that their are other things inside buildings that explode (regarding 911 conspiracies).
Thank you.
fengineer08 3 years ago
I'm sure all of those explosive items such as the diesel for the generators and such were kept in sub levels of the towers. If you look in other videos there a small flashes in the higher floors possible from explosive devices such as cordite.
Simmons22 2 years ago
See, here's where you messed up... by saying "you're sure" that diesel fuel cells were stored in lower levels, and not knowing for certain where they are, but you are somehow sure cordite was used?
What about all the other things that did through out all levels of the buildings? Like big transformers, compressed air tanks, compressed gas tanks, etc etc...
fengineer08 2 years ago
Cordite my dying ass. Cordite is an obsolete small arms propellant, and any asshat who calls it a supersonic explosive is an idiot running a scam to make himself look like an expert. I fire cordite-loaded ammo all the time in my No. 1 MkIII* Enfield (.303 Brit) and it is a lot softer than the nitro cellulose in my 7.62X54R Mosin Nagant.
Go home little boys.
leftysergeant 2 years ago
It could be from building 7.. Didn't fall till hours after the two towers
seans1888 3 years ago
Or from the time between the first and second collapse, which was about 30 minutes I think.
bweazel 3 years ago 2
So... why an explosion AFTER the building's already fallen? Notice all the dust and debris, it's quite obvious the buildings already fell, why would there be an explosion after, and why is this the only video of that explosion? With all the cameras at ground zero you'd think that one would have picked up this explosion.
zakabog 3 years ago
As for flashes of light, how many thousands of windows do you think are in those buildings? Did you know glass will cause flashes of light when light hits them a certain way? Yeah, they like to call that glare. Get a f@#$ing education.
hllyderrick 3 years ago
People must be retarded to wander why there were explosions and flashes of light. two commercial airliners traveling at 500 miles an hour crash into the two largest buildings in the us full of jet fuel which will will obviously ignite every other combustible item in the buldings and causing huge floors to collapse on themselves as they fall. What do people think it will sound like? Two butterflies fighting?
hllyderrick 3 years ago 2
Hmmm. How about a crumbling noise? Crackling? Not fucking exploding!
bweazel 3 years ago
oh come on^^
crackling :P
LOUD crumbling
Mngzkhuel 3 years ago
? What's this suppose to mean man? Are you trying to say that the noise of a building falling to the ground should sound like a series of explosions?
bweazel 3 years ago
hm? o.O I´m saying, this sounds like an explosion, not like a crackling.
the building falling made this sound, maybe because there WAS an explosion.
Mngzkhuel 3 years ago
very well said
jonLukasC 3 years ago
is this another one of those dubbed-in-sound-effect ones?
neomp5 3 years ago
Check out Improbable Collapse and/or Loose Change Final Cut, they are available on Google Video
Also check out the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth website.
akbar360 3 years ago
Every country, including many that don't admire the U.S., has a community of architects, structural engineers, civil engineers, etc. Each member has access to more information (and understands it better, and has tools to analyze it) than the conspiracy believers.
ANY of those engineers or scientists could have published a contradiction to the "official" explanation, and if it is peer-reviewed in one of the scholarly journals that author would be famous forever.
The dog that DIDN'T bark...
Ike
eisenson 3 years ago
Their reaction does not look to me at all like that which I would expect of a man who had heard an explosion. Only the man with the thing on his face seems to react and he is looking where one of the fire fighters was approaching. More typical of the reaction to motion than to an explosion of that magnitude thaqt close. There were, of course, explosions in various places due to burning cars. So, either way, this is proof of bugger-all.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
look at WTC7... it collapsed sudenly when there were only some rooms burning, the collapse of it was controlled demo
reiben91b 3 years ago
Some rooms burning? How many? What is your source?
shooter686 3 years ago
funny yet also sad to see how many on here can sit here and listen to what is obviously a huge explosion and still deny it.
You people need to get a grip because 9/11 truth is coming out and there is not a damn thing you can do to stop it.
WTFU
Nunyaabiz 3 years ago
Proof that there was bombs that really brought the towers down.
redprojet 3 years ago
inside job
zoskiaist 3 years ago 2
lefty... I personally know a firefighter that was there... his whole dept knows its an inside job... And by the way 1000F is far from the 3,000F needed to melt steel... So no you fail
TheFreePatriot 3 years ago
dumbass, the steel didn't need to "melt" and nobody claims it did (other than the twoooooofers). 1000f is a temp at which steel loses about 50% of its strength, at which point the buildings fail. no magical fireproof explosives needed.
Falco98 3 years ago
Sadly, as every other example of a steel framed building that has been on fire prooves, this simply does not happen. Windsor building in Madrid is a good example. WTC7 could have burnt until nothing was left but steel, it would still not have collapsed.
323157 3 years ago
What is the Windsor building a good example of? The portion that was on fire was completely destroyed by collapse. The only reason the whole building didn't collapse was its solid concrete core, and 2 solid concrete dividers the height of 2 floors 1/3 and 2/3 of the way up the building...
Falco98 3 years ago
WTC had a big massive concrete core too, by the way... WTC had only burns in 5 to 6 floors, the windsor building was burned completely (well over 75%), impossible that the WTC has collaped by only those fires
reiben91b 3 years ago
"WTC had a big massive concrete core too"
100% false.
"WTC had only burns in 5 to 6 floors"
Once those floors buckled, the acceleration downward was far more than the lower part of the buildings could hold. Simple physics.
Falco98 3 years ago
Look at what the steel framing did in that fire. The concrete core is what saved the building. Had the building been like the WTCs it would have been totally collapsed.
shooter686 3 years ago
In an open air envirment the max jet fuel burns at is 550F
TheFreePatriot 3 years ago
You're full of shit. I have seen aluminum melt in an open air jet fuel fire.
And steel does not have to melt to fail. If you heat it until it expands enough it will break joints. The building then falls down. If some of the joints were already broken by the impact of multi-ton projectiles, it takes far less energy of any sort to bring on global failure.
Have I made that simple enough for you?
leftysergeant 3 years ago
You obviously know bugger all about explosives. There is no indication anywhere of high explosive detonations. There was a deflagration of jet fuel. There was structural failure. Never was there one indication of high exlosive detonations in either of the towers nor in WTC 7. There was not even a sound of explosions before the towers started to fall.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
You should watch again the video of that day so you may change your mind. Eyewitness, reporters, firefighter and policemen reported about explosions. Open your eyes.
footjob56 3 years ago 3
There were secondary explosions, to be sure. There were a lot of cars burning in the streets. They tend to explode, left unattended.
What Schroeder and Cacchioli report as explsoions were actually a single event which they heard but did not witness because they were inside. Note that they do not describe the collapse of the south tower. That was their horrendous explosion.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
Yes, in all the official versions there were no explosions reported but we heard explosion in some videos and the most important thing are the eyewitness, they reported about explosion, huge, large, big, tremendous explosion, But for the government, simple, they don't exist.
footjob56 3 years ago 3
Schroeder and Cacchioli reported explosions, insist that they were bombs. These occurred while they were inside the building and not looking out the windows. Notice that neither of them can describe the moment that the south tower collapsed. Their "huge explosion" was actually the collapse of the south tower. The second strike was even described in the first radio traffic as an explosion.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
I've posted 3 clips about witness accounts, why don't you watch them? I think that some of them described what they really heard and felt personally.
footjob56 3 years ago 3
hahahahaha this is so great!
So what, you think the government is on our side? That's like the Jews supporting Hitler. You're lying to yourself, brother.
MizterPotatoHead 3 years ago 2