The only way a human can reason is by creating a false reality. The only REAL truth is the present moment, and that is experienced via zen-like states which have nothing to do with machines or simulations. If you think the matrix is a literal concept, you're a moron.
I think the solution is the acceptance of, and embracing of hyperreality (within moderation). Think of Warhol, he seemed like he was having a great time embracing the celebrity lifestyle despite acknowledging it was an entirely fake and vacuous simulation. "A consensual hallucination experienced daily by billions of legitimate operators" - William Gibson in Neuromancer
which is what proponents of po-mo nonsense do not understand - reality is never completly known, but we can get close, by our own experiences over time, by examining evidence from multiple sources etc. I often would like to punch a Po-Mo "philosopher" in the nose, and then tell him that according to his philosophy, there is no such thing as right and wrong, and truth is what you make it (!!) yeah right .... not when it comes to his safety it isnt.
yeah... European philosophers often end up loving their own abstractions and words, at the expense of reality and a useful and comprehensible philosophy. If, say, I watch a lot of documentaries and read a lot of articles saying that life in Kazakhstan is really good, unemployment is low, people have a high standard of living etc, I can verfiy this by actually living and working there for a year...
WE MUST CALL ON THE NAME OF YAHWEH AT LEAST 7 TIMES A DAY AND WE CAN STOP THESE DRACONIAN REPTILIAN DEVILS LORD REV DYJUAN D BARNES YAHWEH PH.D LORDREVDBARNES@GMAIL.COM
resurrection of the dead could also mean to bring someone out of depression. transmutation of substances could mean he knew some science, and healing the blind could mean he helped people to see (the truth).
concept simulation makes concept sense if real exists reality christian concept simulacrum concept parasitic on nature/unnature concept binary opposites creation/God. nature/simulated nature. God reality/satanic delusion unreality. the essence of territory is creation a fabrication of creator. baudrillard must be a christian. but that is obvious.
1:27; that's not a portrait of Jesus, that's a self portrait by Eldritch Durer in a pose reserved for Christ, which was controversial, even heretical in 1500.
i have read the book -simulation and simulacra but i found that i get lost from the meaning, is it the four levels that Jean Baudrillard mention is the meaning of simulacra?
Its like how porn which is simulation replaces a real connection with a real human being in a real relationship with meaning with a false image. That image that countless people look at is addicting and becomes part of the persons reality even though its really not reality its a simulation and in no way a part of the persons reality. the brain thinks its real therefore the stimulation from the simulation. same with movies, video games magazines, TV etc etc etc.....
why reject it when we can embrace it. we embrace the simulacrum of nature. i say embrace it but know reality. know that we are all gods. and in that we have bother good and bad in us. so i say embrace it all. know whats real. and respect all things.
I am so sick of people using computer reading voices to narrate videos like these. There is no reason for a crappy, hard to hear techno voice to be used. If you are trying to seem ominous, you failed. If you think your safety is at risk by using your real voice, you're dumb. If they wanted to track you down they would simply look at the source of the video. I am sorry if it sounds like I am insulting you. I am not trying to, but I cannot sit through any more of these videos with the voices.
I am going to draw a picture of this computer voice person,.
I have now completed my picture of this computer voice person, this picture has no relevence the computer voice person therefore this computer voice person isn't real,
WHY AM I LISTENING TO THIS NON-EXISTENT COMPUTER VOICE?
Then you will see the truth. The truth? Their is no Matrix
the earth is like the matrix because its satans/lucifer/devils our suns creation. He bound our spirits into bodies and put us on one of his prison planets he took away our spiritual memories and put a mental veil of forgetting our spiritual past existence, then he gave us death fear so that 1)we would not leave his matrix 2)could be easier controlled because spirits in fear are easier to control. Fire is the devils only friend because he is atomic fire, he is the sun. The solar system is his
through propaganda and conditioning since birth, people are told to believe that
2+2=5 (free masonic govornment is false,illuminati is only conspiracy,supeprnatural isnt real,happenings at bohemian grove are false etc.). and when sumone comes along to tell them 2+2=4 (illuminati runs our gov. supernatural things are real etc.)not only are we not believed, but we are scorned and hated for telling them the truth.
@rickybarningham now the one or neo in the movie the matrix, is simply the person who in real life can make people understand 2+2=4 not 2+2=5. and that person is yet to show up, maybe becuz its not just one person who will do this, but a large gruop of people who will show the truth to the masses. neo represents that gruop of people. i believe GOD uses movies to "prophecy", becuz it reaches so many people, better then a man standing in a crowd yelling.
@rickybarningham ive met a drifter named McKale once who thought the same thing. before i even told him i believed it as well. why wouldnt god use movies to prophecy, becuz prophets arent the ones who come up with these prophecies, they are just a vessel used by god to spread his word, so god can just as easily use a movie as he can a person.
You missed the fact that Neo was programmed in order to become a saviour or the "one." Therefore, he was really only operating a program in which he thought he was a savior. The Matrix is very twisted and is a program to subliminally sugest that through programming we can transcend a programmed reality.
I will address the religious example of Christ in my next comment.
@SimplyThinkDreams If one were to read what the Bible actually teaches, they would find that we are not to worship ANY images; rather, we are to worship the Creator in Spirit and in Truth. This goes for images of Christ or depictions of God. In the Scriptures, the organizations of the time were corrupt and we are strongly warned to follow God for Truth by reading his word not following organizations. It is a lack of knowledge of God that keeps us from the True Reality.
does anyone see the irony of this you need youtube and tv to get these ideas across so if we were free from electronics and machines most of us woudlnt be here due to no hospitals and medication
your right about the irony of us watching a simulation for truth, but the point i think is not technology but how it has been used to distract and tell obscure truths. Having good advanced medical equipment is better than having a 50inch flat screen tv, then again the market of perscription drugs presents a whole new simulation problem
like july the forth we all are programed to celebrant a day that once mean something now it all about fire works and show a false day in my eyes that has nothing to do with the events of today like we all celebrate new years and we not knowing or celebrating the last years on earth is that nit insane
I also belive this with the bible, it has been tranlated and re written so many times it has become a simulation of what was real at that time -changed and rearranged it contains so much artificial material that christians have become prisoners to it ...to be what the government or the new writers' basis opinon of how people should live their lives along with everything else...
very interesting... any reason for the Velázquez/Bacon paintings? I read a little more on one of your other vids and it said you had "visions"? I'd really like to hear more about this, I too have similar experiences (not sure what to call them, hence my "art").
2/4. Science was rewarded with credibility based on the adopting the standard of "irrefutable evidence". Rather then acknowledge the role the truth played, Science ignores the truth and abandoned their commitment. Credibility eroded as science began to rationalize and justify irrational behavior. Science slid to practice deception and conditioned humanity to follow suit. Ignoring the standard established to gain credibility, science replaced "irrefutable evidence" with "plausible bullshit".
Does science have a moral responsibility not to deliberately mislead, defraud & deceive? Theory of Evolution is being taught as fact, when it does not meet the standard adopted to establish credibility. Science advanced when it met the standard based in truth, "irrefutable evidence". Proven true, is that science & scientists are subject to temptation & failure. Science has failed miserably. A disgraceful ethical failure of moral responsibility with allegiance to ???, the unconscious bastards.
You should be asking God the same question. His answer would be the truth. Mine is merely an opinion and opinions are like assholes, everyone has one and most of them stink.
3/4. July 7, 09 the Piltdown Pope personally delivered an ecclesiastical letter to the G8 Conference directing them to gather the Nations of the earth and appoint a single Moral authority as Dictator (Anti-Christ). As he delivered his historical letter, the press opted to cover M Jackson funeral. The Pope's recent acknowledgment of evolution heralded, as an outward invitation to heal the division that has existed. Evolutionists just got an invitation to the Catholic Church, they can't refuse.
The letter the Piltdown Pope presented before the G8 (Governing Board UN) Conference is in the public domain. The story was covered by several New Papers that gave a shallow understanding of what took place. Several Videos here in you-tube cover the topic and read the 100+ page letter and discuss the content. The letter was written to deliberately be deceptive. A video Series called the "Satanic Empire" shows video of the Pope and a few top Cardinals attending a gathering at Bohemian Grove.
1/4. Science moved from the realm of Witchcraft & Sorcery by adopting "irrefutable evidence" as the appropriate scientific standard. 1913 Piltdown Man, was a manufactured fraud used to by-pass school board objection. 1953 the fraud was finally revealed and Piltdown Man was removed from texts, but not the Theory. 100 yrs later and still no legitimate "missing link". Evolution diminished science to Medieval Sorcery by ethically failing to meet the standard of "irrefutable evidence".
How can you know if you are free of the simulation? It seems that no one ever thinks they are living a simulation because they already think they have risen above it. It is apparent to me how there are several layers of simulation that people believe is reality, but this only makes me wonder if my enlightenment of reality is just another layer of simulation I have yet to overcome.
Perception is the name of the game. How well you persieve things and become aware of them is how "detached" you are from the "simulation"
Next time you see an ambulance behind you going to aid some one or to the hospital ask your self. How does this make me feel? if your response is "just another ambulance" you are yet to be freed of the simulation. if your response is "I hope no one got seriously hurt" you are no longer in a simulation.
Once we detach ourselves from the simulacra we are on another level of understanding than a person who has no idea of what is going on and we will never see the world in the same way again.
It is true that every person is a sinner, but God sacrificed his son, Jesus, for our sins so that we can enter heaven. Of course, one must believe this in order for it to actually happen. And people should believe, if they value their eternity after death. Our time on earth is fragile and short, but the life after is forever and unchanging, be it heaven or hell.
so half of the world is going to hell because they dont believe this? would that be a fair and just god to do such a thing? didnt he give us free will? having faith in god and having faith in man telling u what god wants r 2 different things.
Suppose that to go to heaven, one must at least believe in God. The atheist goes through life, sinning and not believing. At best, he just dies. At worst, he goes to hell. The believer, still sinning, will at worst just die. At best, he goes to heaven. Clearly, the atheist has more to lose. This, from the argument's standpoint, makes atheism seem illogical. So how does this argument not apply? Please? (such a smug thing to say, don't you think, Mr. notanimportantperson)
From the arguments standpoint makes atheism seem illogical?
Their is a humongous flaw in the argument, because it is assuming that heaven and hell exist, so yes if you are a believer it might apply to you, but not neccesarily if you do not believe in either heaven or hell.
It also implies that as atheist the individual goes through life sinning and not believing is not true, he/she can be a very good person but not believe in anything, they do not have to sin - Archaeosix was right in a way...
There is no flaw. Afterall, assuming that heaven and hell do not exist does not mean they are not real, because there is no way to prove their physical existence. So, the person who does not believe still runs the risk of going to hell.
The belief in a divine Christ transcends what is real, because it is impossible for anyone to objectively decide what makes Jesus the Son of God, even when free from "false reality." And if you do decide, then you are assuming. The point is, we are all assuming, atheist or not, that God exists and that Jesus was the Son of God. Luckily, religion is based on faith (making assumptions), I have faith in what I believe, and for the atheists I give you this: Pascal's Wager (look it up)
pascals wager is fukin stupid im sorry. the basis asserts u shud belive in a god NOT A CREATOR. If ur christian ur going to hell if u dnt praise him, if ur a muslim and u dnt praise allah ur going to hell. Therefore the only true faith/lack of faith is agnosticsm, it stands on the boundarys therefore althoug cannot be praised by a creator it cannot b faulted.
the ova problem is that Pascal claims it is wivout reason. However he uses human reason and assumption that god is omnibenevolent and wants to be praised. In a random and chaotic world u cannot make such assumptions and wether faith/praise in a god could equally be angering/ignored by a creator.
One overlooked fact: There is one Lamb. Search history and you will not find the office of sinbearer filled by any human, angel or demon. There is one Lamb and I pray you find Him before your short time is expired.
I read baudrillard as a 'straight' person a few years ago, and didn't really get it. After listening to lots of Terrence McKenna and having psychedelic experiences, it's amazing how much sense these same ideas now make to me.
i know what you mean. i find as i get older and learn 'different' perspectives, that when i re-read something like Baudrillard, or even this essay, how its meaning or interpretation can change for people, even me.
How do you think TM's ideas might fit in with Baudrillard's? I wonder if would have ever made this vid if i never tried acid, or mushrooms?
It is no conspiracy theory. Read Baudrillard's philosophy. If that does not get you off, then you should read "Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism"-Fredrick Jameson. It is about the cultural implications of late capitalism. Philosophy such a Baudrillardian theory may be fun. Philosophy has its limitations. Jameson provides reason and insight to Baudrillard's theories, but does not cross into the not so clear realm of philosophy.
really good reading here. it helped me a lot, along with the comments. it is very insightful. however, viewers should be aware that baudrillard's philosophy is just an interpretation, it isn't a cure for the post-modern condition. neo as jesus is interesting here. the narrative is a reproduction of the resurrection. what does this say about simulation and baudrillard?
because if you kill someone they will be out of the Simulation but they will be dead as well and not be able to see the Desert of the Real.
because they are dead.
Now, here is my theory:
the only way to disconnect your self from the simulation is to have someone on the other side disconnect you then you will be able to see the Desert of the Real.
The Desert of the Real isn't a physical place. It is acceptance that there is much more surrounding us than physicality. That is why at the end of the third movie, Neo's powers manifested in the real world. Unplug yourself from thought-restraints society imposes on us, think for yourself, and don't be distracted by all the material and hedonistic junk around you. Focus inward.
I think J.B. would say that to recognize the simulation as false is the best most of us can do.
Its about seeing the 'other' person as a human being, and not a character in a movie or video game - that can be manipulated or killed without remorse because they arent percieved as real.
Blessed,,,, your analysis by nature rules out any objectivity. The assumptions made about the Universe and God are inherent are moral absolutes. To analyze anything objectively one must distance themself from explaining phenomena with absolutes. Only then may you walk in the desert of the real,,,as Baudrillard would put it.
gypsy- let me just say this - not only am I using rational objectivity skills - but there is more proof of what I say then any other foolish theory put out there by the other religions -
Not to mention the power of the Holy Spirit - which I have experienced - and the dementions of pure scientific study by way of God fearing men and women - OR THOSE WHO BECOME GOD FEARING once they get a clue
With the absolute understanding of the fact that there is a God - then seeing the words of the Bible can hold value - a study of the PATTERNS of God will reveal that there is indeed evil on the earth. - God allows this because of His perfect plan - a form of teaching us "good from evil" as spoken about in Genesis -
Genesis the word has great value -
which is why we call the study of our DNA 'GENETICS'
Okay so with the understanding of possible evil beings doing the manipulation - seek truth
Some will argue with me and say "wait just a minute - you can't prove there is a one true God"
But I say look to the evidence of our entire world history and you will see the pattern of the one true God - who's truth in the bible holds great prophecy
The only book in the entire world that has come true on a regular on going basis is the Bible of the people of Abraham Issac and Jacob.
This old test shows the pattern of the lamb of God which was fortold HE WOULD COME
Knowing that there is a God - which is an absolute truth - then you need to seek the truth of God.
When you say that we are a product of our modern world that is a mis-statement as we are a product of the entire history of the world and how it relates to this generation.
What the matrix did was show the "architect" as a cold heartless entity keeping the truth from the world=
lol what a joke that one is as God keeps telling us about him century after century yet it's US who reject HIM
okay --- remember ---- you asked for my opinion - so here goes:
First I see 85% truth in this - that is to say there is indeed a manipulation of our world that allows for the simulations to become false reality in our minds.
However you forgot quite a few facts in this:'
ONE: THERE IS A ONE TRUE CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE
TWO: THERE IS ALSO A WELL DEFINED EVIL ON THIS SAME EARTH
THREE: HISTORY SHOWS US THAT ALL CULTURES ARE SUBJECT TO THE "COLLECTIVE KNOWLEDGE" OF THE POPULOUS.
I don't understand the implications of being "killed" in the Matrix. Why do they die in real life? Does that signify Baudrillard's claims that once oneself becomes apathetic to to all symbols,he attaches to the simulacra. Is actually death in the matrix reflective of losing oneself to the system of simulations? But one can not die unless they begin to detach themselves from the simulations? I do not understand the symbolism of why Neo dying in the Matrix would actually kill him in real life.
I know exactly what he is getting across that sometimes or all the time we are programed , even emotions , everything is so simulated like it will eventually be a virtual reality , no personal perception involved but programmed perception ...oh wait it's like that now............nice work on the video...
Said with such description the exact separation that I've been contending with. But why not? What products of or individuals within humanity will be substantially significant many, many years from now? A world that has lost its way won't miss one truthseeker when he departs from them on his on road. Things like bills and work though can really fuck up your separation. It's as if, and quite possible, that the Gatekeepers of our illusion today have though eons ahead of the Wakers to ground them.
The 'system' only wants droids and not individuals capable of self thought, awareness nor actions.
The system only wants average individuals blindly trusting and doing what they are told is good or right. Anyone falling outside this range of tolerance is subject to discrimination and punishment.
well done. good video, could use some more pictures. but good video Nic, the prose contains true baudrilardian hyperbole, and youve paraphrased some of his key points well. i also liked the connection to columbine. Was this your own example?
This is the Unabomber's Manifesto. Many people are unaware that the unabomber didn't choose his victims randomly, he picked his victims due to their connections in the field of robotics and A.I. development as he feared that technology would soon destroy our species and the world.
Ooops....I was wrong, however, this is very similiar to the style of the unabomber's manifesto that I am wondering if Ted Kazenski was inspired by Baudrillard.
it does sound very similar, I agree. the unabomber seemed to be inspired by the french postmodernist movement in his questioning of all modern structures. his notions of the absurd missions in life that humans formulate in a society that largely caters for their physical needs, in lieu of the existential desire to survive and the personal missions that goal would entail is largely john zerzan, who was also inspired by postmodernism, of which baudrillard was a huge part
The irony is that this video is viewed by people on Youtube, on a computer.
ChronoTriggerMusic 1 day ago
Well done my friend, well done
HiGhLiKeAlLaDin 2 weeks ago
So Neo was a neo-Platonist, trying to get out of the cave of false (simulated) reality?
tiz444 2 weeks ago
1:06 and no clips from the Matrix! fuck this shit i'm out of here
THESCHNEV 3 weeks ago
Why did Beaudrillard say that the Matrix was a misunderstanding of his ideas?
descentfromhistory 5 months ago
The only way a human can reason is by creating a false reality. The only REAL truth is the present moment, and that is experienced via zen-like states which have nothing to do with machines or simulations. If you think the matrix is a literal concept, you're a moron.
moderjoker 6 months ago
Plato said this in a simpler way. Come on.
moderjoker 6 months ago
I think the solution is the acceptance of, and embracing of hyperreality (within moderation). Think of Warhol, he seemed like he was having a great time embracing the celebrity lifestyle despite acknowledging it was an entirely fake and vacuous simulation. "A consensual hallucination experienced daily by billions of legitimate operators" - William Gibson in Neuromancer
HSzach 7 months ago
which is what proponents of po-mo nonsense do not understand - reality is never completly known, but we can get close, by our own experiences over time, by examining evidence from multiple sources etc. I often would like to punch a Po-Mo "philosopher" in the nose, and then tell him that according to his philosophy, there is no such thing as right and wrong, and truth is what you make it (!!) yeah right .... not when it comes to his safety it isnt.
MrAussieJules 8 months ago
yeah... European philosophers often end up loving their own abstractions and words, at the expense of reality and a useful and comprehensible philosophy. If, say, I watch a lot of documentaries and read a lot of articles saying that life in Kazakhstan is really good, unemployment is low, people have a high standard of living etc, I can verfiy this by actually living and working there for a year...
MrAussieJules 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WE MUST CALL ON THE NAME OF YAHWEH AT LEAST 7 TIMES A DAY AND WE CAN STOP THESE DRACONIAN REPTILIAN DEVILS LORD REV DYJUAN D BARNES YAHWEH PH.D LORDREVDBARNES@GMAIL.COM
yahshua69 8 months ago
resurrection of the dead could also mean to bring someone out of depression. transmutation of substances could mean he knew some science, and healing the blind could mean he helped people to see (the truth).
johnnyappleseedism 8 months ago
beardsofpraise 9 months ago
Quite a portrait. Thanks for sharing.
MatthewJoelSforcina 10 months ago
1:27; that's not a portrait of Jesus, that's a self portrait by Eldritch Durer in a pose reserved for Christ, which was controversial, even heretical in 1500.
Qtown20 10 months ago
Have a look at this people type in truthcontest in google click 1st link-The Truth Contest|Universal Truth of Life
Click on the entry called “The Present.” what it says will turn this world around. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
If anything on the site rings true to you -
Forward this letter to everyone in your address book; everyone needs to see it.
Conciousnow1983 10 months ago
I bet there's thousands of kids thinking they're smart now after watching this... rofl.
Rw7451 11 months ago
i have read the book -simulation and simulacra but i found that i get lost from the meaning, is it the four levels that Jean Baudrillard mention is the meaning of simulacra?
ukiaya 11 months ago
so much can be said about this topic in society.
Itsfaith33 1 year ago
Its like how porn which is simulation replaces a real connection with a real human being in a real relationship with meaning with a false image. That image that countless people look at is addicting and becomes part of the persons reality even though its really not reality its a simulation and in no way a part of the persons reality. the brain thinks its real therefore the stimulation from the simulation. same with movies, video games magazines, TV etc etc etc.....
Itsfaith33 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
pbjgame 1 year ago
why reject it when we can embrace it. we embrace the simulacrum of nature. i say embrace it but know reality. know that we are all gods. and in that we have bother good and bad in us. so i say embrace it all. know whats real. and respect all things.
tewster 1 year ago
This video just fucked my whole life up.
bawejama 1 year ago
Hate that voice
trebolab 1 year ago
It's funny how our teacher kept on mentioning this movie. He always thought the whole world was like the matrix.
angelicbeing4u 1 year ago
Humans remain a virus that give nothing back to the planet they trash on a yearly basis.
MickeyLove01 1 year ago
life would be so much easier if beaudrillard had never been born :)
rietveen26 1 year ago
I really like this vid, but thought that the Stephen Hawking voice was a bit much... Maybe the creator was making a point with that too....
s4njuro 1 year ago
The point is there is no "Reality" there is no "Truth"... you cant disconnect nor see reality or found truth, that's Baudrillard point!!!
BUDA20 1 year ago
I am so sick of people using computer reading voices to narrate videos like these. There is no reason for a crappy, hard to hear techno voice to be used. If you are trying to seem ominous, you failed. If you think your safety is at risk by using your real voice, you're dumb. If they wanted to track you down they would simply look at the source of the video. I am sorry if it sounds like I am insulting you. I am not trying to, but I cannot sit through any more of these videos with the voices.
GregorEzpo 1 year ago
genius presentation my friend :) i see you
SOCRATES012 1 year ago
@SOCRATES012
thanks ;)
phatcityhogs 1 year ago
I am going to draw a picture of this computer voice person,.
I have now completed my picture of this computer voice person, this picture has no relevence the computer voice person therefore this computer voice person isn't real,
WHY AM I LISTENING TO THIS NON-EXISTENT COMPUTER VOICE?
Then you will see the truth. The truth? Their is no Matrix
099749 1 year ago
each person has there own simulation that appears real to them
killwhitey88d 1 year ago
the earth is like the matrix because its satans/lucifer/devils our suns creation. He bound our spirits into bodies and put us on one of his prison planets he took away our spiritual memories and put a mental veil of forgetting our spiritual past existence, then he gave us death fear so that 1)we would not leave his matrix 2)could be easier controlled because spirits in fear are easier to control. Fire is the devils only friend because he is atomic fire, he is the sun. The solar system is his
HealingVibrations 1 year ago
@HealingVibrations, do not forget that there is no proof for this opinion, otherwise this idea may lead to incorrect conclusions
rietveen26 1 year ago
is this video spiritual?
how this world is just a dream and not reality?
legorocks3 1 year ago
@legorocks3
its just food for thought really :)
phatcityhogs 1 year ago
Great video!
tommytalks77 1 year ago
1:30 - it's Albrecht Durer
BandytaCzasu 1 year ago
through propaganda and conditioning since birth, people are told to believe that
2+2=5 (free masonic govornment is false,illuminati is only conspiracy,supeprnatural isnt real,happenings at bohemian grove are false etc.). and when sumone comes along to tell them 2+2=4 (illuminati runs our gov. supernatural things are real etc.)not only are we not believed, but we are scorned and hated for telling them the truth.
rickybarningham 1 year ago
@rickybarningham now the one or neo in the movie the matrix, is simply the person who in real life can make people understand 2+2=4 not 2+2=5. and that person is yet to show up, maybe becuz its not just one person who will do this, but a large gruop of people who will show the truth to the masses. neo represents that gruop of people. i believe GOD uses movies to "prophecy", becuz it reaches so many people, better then a man standing in a crowd yelling.
rickybarningham 1 year ago
@rickybarningham ive met a drifter named McKale once who thought the same thing. before i even told him i believed it as well. why wouldnt god use movies to prophecy, becuz prophets arent the ones who come up with these prophecies, they are just a vessel used by god to spread his word, so god can just as easily use a movie as he can a person.
rickybarningham 1 year ago
You missed the fact that Neo was programmed in order to become a saviour or the "one." Therefore, he was really only operating a program in which he thought he was a savior. The Matrix is very twisted and is a program to subliminally sugest that through programming we can transcend a programmed reality.
I will address the religious example of Christ in my next comment.
SimplyThinkDreams 1 year ago
@SimplyThinkDreams If one were to read what the Bible actually teaches, they would find that we are not to worship ANY images; rather, we are to worship the Creator in Spirit and in Truth. This goes for images of Christ or depictions of God. In the Scriptures, the organizations of the time were corrupt and we are strongly warned to follow God for Truth by reading his word not following organizations. It is a lack of knowledge of God that keeps us from the True Reality.
SimplyThinkDreams 1 year ago
I like the vid but the person who wrote the matrix is SOPHIA STEWART....
charlene615 1 year ago
i hope this is going somewhere
jebotebogiusername 1 year ago
'Dark City' predates 'The Matrix' by a year.
IggyHazard 1 year ago
s Truth - FalseGod alive - God murdered
The "I", all of us refer to when speaking about our[selves] is always divided.
The present, of our "here and now" - always a divided present.
All this should be abundently clear from this clip:
stronkdisselboom 1 year ago
Great video! and the artificial computer voice adds a perfect layer of simulation to it.
zensorship 1 year ago
A simulation exposing the "real" simulation. Hilarious
killwhitey88d 1 year ago
does anyone see the irony of this you need youtube and tv to get these ideas across so if we were free from electronics and machines most of us woudlnt be here due to no hospitals and medication
balbyboy18 1 year ago
your right about the irony of us watching a simulation for truth, but the point i think is not technology but how it has been used to distract and tell obscure truths. Having good advanced medical equipment is better than having a 50inch flat screen tv, then again the market of perscription drugs presents a whole new simulation problem
killwhitey88d 1 year ago
Es curioso como de una patrón, realidad, pueden salir múltiples interpretaciones de lo mismo. Todos diferentes... como un árbol, todo fractal.
Daniazco 1 year ago
Que inocente fue cristo.
Daniazco 1 year ago
What is the solution ?"
My mind tells me moderation.
tylerdurden562 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We live in a matrix-like universe. Check my channel to learn more, and also to learn Satan's true history.
SatanHolyDevil 1 year ago
nice dallas lightning shot man and nice info too...
samherf 2 years ago
like july the forth we all are programed to celebrant a day that once mean something now it all about fire works and show a false day in my eyes that has nothing to do with the events of today like we all celebrate new years and we not knowing or celebrating the last years on earth is that nit insane
TheNike2009 2 years ago
I also belive this with the bible, it has been tranlated and re written so many times it has become a simulation of what was real at that time -changed and rearranged it contains so much artificial material that christians have become prisoners to it ...to be what the government or the new writers' basis opinon of how people should live their lives along with everything else...
lesphucc 2 years ago
FUCKING AWESOME
drkthms1 2 years ago
very interesting... any reason for the Velázquez/Bacon paintings? I read a little more on one of your other vids and it said you had "visions"? I'd really like to hear more about this, I too have similar experiences (not sure what to call them, hence my "art").
sdrs85 2 years ago
ugh....I wish you would have just read it yourself! I hate these computer voices!
kellann55 2 years ago
2/4. Science was rewarded with credibility based on the adopting the standard of "irrefutable evidence". Rather then acknowledge the role the truth played, Science ignores the truth and abandoned their commitment. Credibility eroded as science began to rationalize and justify irrational behavior. Science slid to practice deception and conditioned humanity to follow suit. Ignoring the standard established to gain credibility, science replaced "irrefutable evidence" with "plausible bullshit".
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
So where exactly are you going with this?
whatshendrix 2 years ago
Does science have a moral responsibility not to deliberately mislead, defraud & deceive? Theory of Evolution is being taught as fact, when it does not meet the standard adopted to establish credibility. Science advanced when it met the standard based in truth, "irrefutable evidence". Proven true, is that science & scientists are subject to temptation & failure. Science has failed miserably. A disgraceful ethical failure of moral responsibility with allegiance to ???, the unconscious bastards.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
You should be asking God the same question. His answer would be the truth. Mine is merely an opinion and opinions are like assholes, everyone has one and most of them stink.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Do you like to contradict yourself?
whatshendrix 2 years ago
3/4. July 7, 09 the Piltdown Pope personally delivered an ecclesiastical letter to the G8 Conference directing them to gather the Nations of the earth and appoint a single Moral authority as Dictator (Anti-Christ). As he delivered his historical letter, the press opted to cover M Jackson funeral. The Pope's recent acknowledgment of evolution heralded, as an outward invitation to heal the division that has existed. Evolutionists just got an invitation to the Catholic Church, they can't refuse.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
really??? that's astonishing... whats ur source of this info and who'd the pope say the anti-christ Svperstar is????
samherf 2 years ago
The letter the Piltdown Pope presented before the G8 (Governing Board UN) Conference is in the public domain. The story was covered by several New Papers that gave a shallow understanding of what took place. Several Videos here in you-tube cover the topic and read the 100+ page letter and discuss the content. The letter was written to deliberately be deceptive. A video Series called the "Satanic Empire" shows video of the Pope and a few top Cardinals attending a gathering at Bohemian Grove.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
1/4. Science moved from the realm of Witchcraft & Sorcery by adopting "irrefutable evidence" as the appropriate scientific standard. 1913 Piltdown Man, was a manufactured fraud used to by-pass school board objection. 1953 the fraud was finally revealed and Piltdown Man was removed from texts, but not the Theory. 100 yrs later and still no legitimate "missing link". Evolution diminished science to Medieval Sorcery by ethically failing to meet the standard of "irrefutable evidence".
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
i loved the computer voice. Very nice touch!
Arcadiax91 2 years ago
Fantastic video sir ! =)
cyncmaster150 2 years ago
thanks for all the amazing comments everyone. it really seems to make the video a lot more accessible, and open. thanks again :)
phatcityhogs 2 years ago
awesome video
burgandy4130 2 years ago
Nothing like having an expressionless computer voice tell you whats real.
Aliendear 2 years ago
im starting to think the amish people had it right all along
dat1youngdude 2 years ago
How can you know if you are free of the simulation? It seems that no one ever thinks they are living a simulation because they already think they have risen above it. It is apparent to me how there are several layers of simulation that people believe is reality, but this only makes me wonder if my enlightenment of reality is just another layer of simulation I have yet to overcome.
Bones0 2 years ago
Hello! Great thinking there, this "enlightenment" is indeed another "layer" to be transcended.
HUGS :)
*Simon*
SimonNight30 2 years ago
Perception is the name of the game. How well you persieve things and become aware of them is how "detached" you are from the "simulation"
Next time you see an ambulance behind you going to aid some one or to the hospital ask your self. How does this make me feel? if your response is "just another ambulance" you are yet to be freed of the simulation. if your response is "I hope no one got seriously hurt" you are no longer in a simulation.
JvampDude 2 years ago
Once we detach ourselves from the simulacra we are on another level of understanding than a person who has no idea of what is going on and we will never see the world in the same way again.
carlosnunom89 2 years ago
I've come to the conclusion that I would be better off living in a mud hut in the woods[ I am serious]... growoing my own needs etc
djmisplacedmarblesTV 2 years ago
I dig the video!
SpectacleofDebord 2 years ago
This voice just kills me... could I just read the text somewhere, please? :(
Maliciuos 2 years ago
Why did I see a map of Lithuania in this video? :O
Did Matrix got me or what?
Maliciuos 2 years ago
This is a terrible video written by an antisocial luddite. I find it extremely ironic that a computer voice reads the essay.
wellshucksflux 2 years ago
lol, nice observation
"there is a problem with modern society ... it contains so much artificial material, that we have become prisoners to it"
lol.
sammygee17 2 years ago
It is true that every person is a sinner, but God sacrificed his son, Jesus, for our sins so that we can enter heaven. Of course, one must believe this in order for it to actually happen. And people should believe, if they value their eternity after death. Our time on earth is fragile and short, but the life after is forever and unchanging, be it heaven or hell.
erh5061 2 years ago
so half of the world is going to hell because they dont believe this? would that be a fair and just god to do such a thing? didnt he give us free will? having faith in god and having faith in man telling u what god wants r 2 different things.
jaemw 2 years ago
Quinquae viae - read it, please.
kunwari13 2 years ago
deep
drkthms1 2 years ago
Dude... What the fuck is up with the ending... Am I just really high, or are you guys pulling a prank on us ?
Fuck me.
tylerdurden562 2 years ago
lol, no pranks dude. just some reality theory for the 21st century.
phatcityhogs 2 years ago
Pascal's Wager:
Suppose that to go to heaven, one must at least believe in God. The atheist goes through life, sinning and not believing. At best, he just dies. At worst, he goes to hell. The believer, still sinning, will at worst just die. At best, he goes to heaven. Clearly, the atheist has more to lose. This, from the argument's standpoint, makes atheism seem illogical. So how does this argument not apply? Please? (such a smug thing to say, don't you think, Mr. notanimportantperson)
erh5061 2 years ago
"This, from the argument's standpoint, makes atheism seem illogical."
No, it makes god seem illogical, not atheism. Think about it.
Archaeosix 2 years ago
"So how does this argument not apply? Please?"
Because it is illogical. Does it really need explaining? There must be over a hundred videos on YT explaining why.
Archaeosix 2 years ago
From the arguments standpoint makes atheism seem illogical?
Their is a humongous flaw in the argument, because it is assuming that heaven and hell exist, so yes if you are a believer it might apply to you, but not neccesarily if you do not believe in either heaven or hell.
It also implies that as atheist the individual goes through life sinning and not believing is not true, he/she can be a very good person but not believe in anything, they do not have to sin - Archaeosix was right in a way...
f00tbol 2 years ago
There is no flaw. Afterall, assuming that heaven and hell do not exist does not mean they are not real, because there is no way to prove their physical existence. So, the person who does not believe still runs the risk of going to hell.
erh5061 2 years ago
"assuming that heaven and hell do not exist does not mean they are not real", is this sentence not an oxymoron?
You just said assuming they do not exist...
you are right their is no way to prove their physical existence, why should we concern ourselves with what if's.
It is an endless argument...
All we can do is try to be best that we can be and live our lives one day at a time, peace out!
f00tbol 2 years ago
To Markeybizz: Christians will not go to hell if they do not praise God, so long as they believe that Jesus died for their sins.
erh5061 2 years ago
we will not praise god in heaven
Prais is of the flesh and this age
if a man is suffocating and you give him air he praises you and thanks you
but a month later you come to him and he is breathing normal and does not thank you for every breath after the first
if a blind man is given sight he thanks god and praises but a year later he see the sun rising and says it is a good day and continues on his way
we praise god as a fast for that we dont have the groom FATHER matrix gAotu with us
reconorder 2 years ago
The belief in a divine Christ transcends what is real, because it is impossible for anyone to objectively decide what makes Jesus the Son of God, even when free from "false reality." And if you do decide, then you are assuming. The point is, we are all assuming, atheist or not, that God exists and that Jesus was the Son of God. Luckily, religion is based on faith (making assumptions), I have faith in what I believe, and for the atheists I give you this: Pascal's Wager (look it up)
erh5061 2 years ago
just for the record i dont consider myself a atheist. thanks for the interesting comment though. ill check out the info
phatcityhogs 2 years ago
pascals wager is fukin stupid im sorry. the basis asserts u shud belive in a god NOT A CREATOR. If ur christian ur going to hell if u dnt praise him, if ur a muslim and u dnt praise allah ur going to hell. Therefore the only true faith/lack of faith is agnosticsm, it stands on the boundarys therefore althoug cannot be praised by a creator it cannot b faulted.
markeybizz 2 years ago
the ova problem is that Pascal claims it is wivout reason. However he uses human reason and assumption that god is omnibenevolent and wants to be praised. In a random and chaotic world u cannot make such assumptions and wether faith/praise in a god could equally be angering/ignored by a creator.
markeybizz 2 years ago
belief is not subject to will. Pascal's Wager does not constitute a good arguement, please try again.
notanimportantperson 2 years ago
It turns us into a droid capable of only emotion... It is our emotionality that is manipulated. The last part is simply incorrect.
Synergy2055 2 years ago
no its: "turns us into droids, incapable of human emotion"
phatcityhogs 2 years ago
this audio is hard to understand. can you create a video with more clear statements?
themichaelplaster 2 years ago
i might do that sometime this summer, i guess its a tough video for ppl who cant read english, or easily understand a distorted voice sim.
phatcityhogs 2 years ago
lol
chris999696699 2 years ago
One overlooked fact: There is one Lamb. Search history and you will not find the office of sinbearer filled by any human, angel or demon. There is one Lamb and I pray you find Him before your short time is expired.
DeBunker7 2 years ago
it's called IRONY, y'all. It's for smart people...
donbezi 2 years ago
The recent attacks in Mumbai were also well executed in the dark. The attackers apparently simulated the hotel floors in a similar game.
Issa618 2 years ago
whoa really? thats crazy, and scary
phatcityhogs 2 years ago
Ok, i get it!... using text to speech software as a Bauldrillardian archetype....but!.... its makes it so, so frustrating to listen to!
jamesveale 2 years ago
this allmost make sence... for mokeys XD
kidding, really.. this makes sence :S
weird...
gunnar752 2 years ago
We have always been slaves; now we are slaves to ourselves.
Also, you're incredibly ignorant.
JerrySinefield 3 years ago
You're funny.
bigchinasean 3 years ago
Funny how? Funny like a clown? Do I amuse you?
JerrySinefield 3 years ago
a very interesting insight...
maikeru1 3 years ago
thanks very much
phatcityhogs 3 years ago
the computer voice makes this video seem so contrived that it's too annoying to watch.
cassettemix 3 years ago
try muting it, and use the annotations . that might work. srry your annoyed lol. i was trying to make a point though
phatcityhogs 3 years ago
I read baudrillard as a 'straight' person a few years ago, and didn't really get it. After listening to lots of Terrence McKenna and having psychedelic experiences, it's amazing how much sense these same ideas now make to me.
fasdl 3 years ago
i know what you mean. i find as i get older and learn 'different' perspectives, that when i re-read something like Baudrillard, or even this essay, how its meaning or interpretation can change for people, even me.
How do you think TM's ideas might fit in with Baudrillard's? I wonder if would have ever made this vid if i never tried acid, or mushrooms?
phatcityhogs 3 years ago
The vid should be renamed
"Master Cheif Sucks At Conspiracy Theories"
DarkJigglypuff 3 years ago
This isn't a conspiracy theory!
This is the philosophy of Jean Baudrillard.
It is similiar to the cave metaphor of plato.
but it isn't the same.
Jobbywl 3 years ago
Search for "Master Cheif sucks at Halo", I was reffering to the use of Microsoft Sam
DarkJigglypuff 3 years ago
It is no conspiracy theory. Read Baudrillard's philosophy. If that does not get you off, then you should read "Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism"-Fredrick Jameson. It is about the cultural implications of late capitalism. Philosophy such a Baudrillardian theory may be fun. Philosophy has its limitations. Jameson provides reason and insight to Baudrillard's theories, but does not cross into the not so clear realm of philosophy.
GypsyRhapsody 3 years ago
agreed so im not gonna say fucking gay or anything rude im gonna say...potatoes!
tehplow 3 years ago
I liked the parallels you drew between three seemingly unrelated topics. Insightful, if a sludgey.
sleepily 3 years ago
really good reading here. it helped me a lot, along with the comments. it is very insightful. however, viewers should be aware that baudrillard's philosophy is just an interpretation, it isn't a cure for the post-modern condition. neo as jesus is interesting here. the narrative is a reproduction of the resurrection. what does this say about simulation and baudrillard?
clarkej2 3 years ago
So how do we get out of the simulation then?
because if you kill someone they will be out of the Simulation but they will be dead as well and not be able to see the Desert of the Real.
because they are dead.
Now, here is my theory:
the only way to disconnect your self from the simulation is to have someone on the other side disconnect you then you will be able to see the Desert of the Real.
Tiberiansun292 3 years ago
The Desert of the Real isn't a physical place. It is acceptance that there is much more surrounding us than physicality. That is why at the end of the third movie, Neo's powers manifested in the real world. Unplug yourself from thought-restraints society imposes on us, think for yourself, and don't be distracted by all the material and hedonistic junk around you. Focus inward.
odin2358 3 years ago
I think J.B. would say that to recognize the simulation as false is the best most of us can do.
Its about seeing the 'other' person as a human being, and not a character in a movie or video game - that can be manipulated or killed without remorse because they arent percieved as real.
phatcityhogs 2 years ago
wtf? wow
dreyko11185 3 years ago
Blessed,,,, your analysis by nature rules out any objectivity. The assumptions made about the Universe and God are inherent are moral absolutes. To analyze anything objectively one must distance themself from explaining phenomena with absolutes. Only then may you walk in the desert of the real,,,as Baudrillard would put it.
GypsyRhapsody 3 years ago
gypsy- let me just say this - not only am I using rational objectivity skills - but there is more proof of what I say then any other foolish theory put out there by the other religions -
Not to mention the power of the Holy Spirit - which I have experienced - and the dementions of pure scientific study by way of God fearing men and women - OR THOSE WHO BECOME GOD FEARING once they get a clue
google Dr. Francis collins God
google scientists who believe in God
string theory proves God
BLESSEDone333 3 years ago
With the absolute understanding of the fact that there is a God - then seeing the words of the Bible can hold value - a study of the PATTERNS of God will reveal that there is indeed evil on the earth. - God allows this because of His perfect plan - a form of teaching us "good from evil" as spoken about in Genesis -
Genesis the word has great value -
which is why we call the study of our DNA 'GENETICS'
Okay so with the understanding of possible evil beings doing the manipulation - seek truth
BLESSEDone333 3 years ago
I love to study languages of the world and how they relate to one another- what there words mean and what residual value they hold.
Example:
UNIVERSE
UNI means one
VERSE means spoken or written word
Genesis 1:3
And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
God speaks and stuff happens. That is the defining action of the divine Creator.
There is no other being in our universe that can do that. They can MANIPULATE particulates but not create from nothing
BLESSEDone333 3 years ago
Some will argue with me and say "wait just a minute - you can't prove there is a one true God"
But I say look to the evidence of our entire world history and you will see the pattern of the one true God - who's truth in the bible holds great prophecy
The only book in the entire world that has come true on a regular on going basis is the Bible of the people of Abraham Issac and Jacob.
This old test shows the pattern of the lamb of God which was fortold HE WOULD COME
BLESSEDone333 3 years ago
Knowing that there is a God - which is an absolute truth - then you need to seek the truth of God.
When you say that we are a product of our modern world that is a mis-statement as we are a product of the entire history of the world and how it relates to this generation.
What the matrix did was show the "architect" as a cold heartless entity keeping the truth from the world=
lol what a joke that one is as God keeps telling us about him century after century yet it's US who reject HIM
BLESSEDone333 3 years ago
okay --- remember ---- you asked for my opinion - so here goes:
First I see 85% truth in this - that is to say there is indeed a manipulation of our world that allows for the simulations to become false reality in our minds.
However you forgot quite a few facts in this:'
ONE: THERE IS A ONE TRUE CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE
TWO: THERE IS ALSO A WELL DEFINED EVIL ON THIS SAME EARTH
THREE: HISTORY SHOWS US THAT ALL CULTURES ARE SUBJECT TO THE "COLLECTIVE KNOWLEDGE" OF THE POPULOUS.
BLESSEDone333 3 years ago
I am very impressed with your representation. This was very helpful in presenting the powerful implications of deviance in a postmodern society.
GypsyRhapsody 3 years ago
thanks a lot. glad it was helpful
phatcityhogs 2 years ago
I don't understand the implications of being "killed" in the Matrix. Why do they die in real life? Does that signify Baudrillard's claims that once oneself becomes apathetic to to all symbols,he attaches to the simulacra. Is actually death in the matrix reflective of losing oneself to the system of simulations? But one can not die unless they begin to detach themselves from the simulations? I do not understand the symbolism of why Neo dying in the Matrix would actually kill him in real life.
GypsyRhapsody 3 years ago
hmm, thats an interesting question. not sure i have an answer. ill think on that one. maybe someone else knows. i bet BLESSEDone333 does.
phatcityhogs 3 years ago
i think there just brain dead?
Johnhawkes 2 years ago
This was a complete circle back to the fact that there are people out there who want us dead.
Chaoman60 3 years ago
brilliant
astoria791 3 years ago
lol wut
dyingtoliveRWTF 3 years ago
i watched this, agreed, doubted, then agreed.
but as soon as it ended i realize that disconnecting from the perceived reality leads to nothing but a depressed pessimistic life of longing for more.
fuck being smart. your mind goes nowhere but in circles.
PP89089 3 years ago
I know exactly what he is getting across that sometimes or all the time we are programed , even emotions , everything is so simulated like it will eventually be a virtual reality , no personal perception involved but programmed perception ...oh wait it's like that now............nice work on the video...
3Eyescominatcha 3 years ago
I think humanity is overrated. We will all be destroyed someday. soon. Watch the main video on on my playlist. the end is near
3435464656 3 years ago
microsoft sam is very wise
diogeneslaertius666 3 years ago
Said with such description the exact separation that I've been contending with. But why not? What products of or individuals within humanity will be substantially significant many, many years from now? A world that has lost its way won't miss one truthseeker when he departs from them on his on road. Things like bills and work though can really fuck up your separation. It's as if, and quite possible, that the Gatekeepers of our illusion today have though eons ahead of the Wakers to ground them.
painandink37 3 years ago
wut?
JeramiePalmer 3 years ago
A man with no faith disapproves of anything they cannot prove.
mrgamnwatch 3 years ago
that's the point fucko
thebeartaxes 3 years ago
It's Microsoft Sam!!!
coopersnig 3 years ago
The 'system' only wants droids and not individuals capable of self thought, awareness nor actions.
The system only wants average individuals blindly trusting and doing what they are told is good or right. Anyone falling outside this range of tolerance is subject to discrimination and punishment.
rbolo29 3 years ago 2
that's how it's designed, definitely
painandink37 3 years ago 2
the image of Christ comes from the shroud of turin, a healing object of power in it's own right
paulagloria 3 years ago
well done. good video, could use some more pictures. but good video Nic, the prose contains true baudrilardian hyperbole, and youve paraphrased some of his key points well. i also liked the connection to columbine. Was this your own example?
megakillab 3 years ago
yes it was. thanks for the comment.
phatcityhogs 2 years ago
you are the cia
NeoOneOrg 3 years ago
everything you say is true be sure, but have you the answers to the solution?
NeoOneOrg 3 years ago
wish i did
phatcityhogs 2 years ago
This is the Unabomber's Manifesto. Many people are unaware that the unabomber didn't choose his victims randomly, he picked his victims due to their connections in the field of robotics and A.I. development as he feared that technology would soon destroy our species and the world.
BoyintheMachine 4 years ago
Ooops....I was wrong, however, this is very similiar to the style of the unabomber's manifesto that I am wondering if Ted Kazenski was inspired by Baudrillard.
BoyintheMachine 4 years ago
it does sound very similar, I agree. the unabomber seemed to be inspired by the french postmodernist movement in his questioning of all modern structures. his notions of the absurd missions in life that humans formulate in a society that largely caters for their physical needs, in lieu of the existential desire to survive and the personal missions that goal would entail is largely john zerzan, who was also inspired by postmodernism, of which baudrillard was a huge part
SolarPlexus3 4 years ago
i've heard that neo resresented jesus, only in his sacrafice could he free humanity form satan reaping or souls, satan being mr smith.
edwardpoppy 4 years ago
When you're extremely skeptical of idealism, you become Machiavellian.
When you're extremely skeptical of authority, you become an Anarchist.
When you're extremely skeptical of both you become a counter-productive murderer (Columbine, VTech).
spideysense 4 years ago
dude what kind of comment was that?
OculusDraconis 4 years ago 3
We need literate anarchists who believe in karma.
spideysense 4 years ago
this video is some crazy shit ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Nothingswhatitseems