@Piotrek051197 Do you mean? : "Personally, I like this film, although there are a few mistakes in it, but it's our movie, Polish." I know Kawalerowicz is Polish and the novel by Sienkiewicz is Polish too. Because I learned russian I understand some Polish words. And yes, Kawalerowicz version is awesome. Greetings. Nicky
@ShowYourWorking It's not exactly a remake. Kawalerowicz intended to make the movie in his old style (see e.g. "Faraon" '67). It's not Hollywood historical blockbuster, just like Faraon wasn't that of Mankiewcz "Kleopatra" one.
Are you understand Polish :D?
Osobiście lubię ów film, chociaż jest w nim parę błędów, ale to film nasz, polski.
Piotrek051197 9 months ago
@Piotrek051197 Do you mean? : "Personally, I like this film, although there are a few mistakes in it, but it's our movie, Polish." I know Kawalerowicz is Polish and the novel by Sienkiewicz is Polish too. Because I learned russian I understand some Polish words. And yes, Kawalerowicz version is awesome. Greetings. Nicky
MsNickym1 8 months ago
Maravillosa secuencia.
jcjurador 1 year ago
@ShowYourWorking --- No! The 1951 film has a different approach. This film is more faithful to the book.
Karen41872 1 year ago
@ShowYourWorking It's not exactly a remake. Kawalerowicz intended to make the movie in his old style (see e.g. "Faraon" '67). It's not Hollywood historical blockbuster, just like Faraon wasn't that of Mankiewcz "Kleopatra" one.
TheMaciejgo 1 year ago