Twin fuselage construction doesn't create a "weak spot" in the wing joint.. It's terribly important here not to think like the plane was lifted from one spot, as if it hangs from a lifting hook. When in flight, the lift distributes to the entire wing surface. The correct visualization is to rest the plane on sand bags by it's wings, instead of hanging the plane from it's wingtips or the center joint.
As for those asking why two fuselages, please consider this; the VSS Enterprise is quite a bit larger than SpaceShipOne was. If it was mounted under the fuselage, the entire plane would sit so high it would need a jumbo jet hangar. It would also still need the twin booms for the landing gear. It makes great sense to omit the central nacelle and instead use twin fuselage layout.
Over and over people question -- why two fuselages...? I haven't seen a real answer, other than something like "Because they can". I suppose that's an adequate answer if you're Richard B.
I have to disagree, look at how thin the wings look, and imagine it holding essentially a whole fuselage with 8 people in it. Not just a P-38. Although the concept is ideally the same.
I went to the shwo to watch this. in the middle it will hold a pod that holds like 10 people and it will shoot it just out of the earth's atmposhphere and into space. but the tickets cost $200,000.
Wow, you are in m y hometown! Iam going this weekend. Its fun in Oshkosh, as you never know what is going to fly over your house! My Dad drives one of the trams every year there, and he also does volunteer carpentry work. This is the first year he wont be bringing his Taylor craft and Citabria.
Yes, but why not on the bottom of a standard fuselage? Does the double fuselage airframe provide better aeronautic stability? Are both cockpits utilized?
It's a "twin boom" design. Essentially it's a symmetrical design to accommodate the payload. There may also be structural and aerodynamic reasons too. Rutan thinks outside the box. Although not the same, take a look at the P-38.
yea, it would either have to be carried under the wings like the usually do on fighters for drop payloads or internally like b-1 bomber. but if it's on only one wing, the other side has to be balanced. also, it may fly into remainder of plane on launch. ditto (to lesser degree) on internal. if internal, a larger plane has to be designed to hold the capsule. and does it load and release from rear or underneath? twin boom combines ease of wing loading & launch w/ balance advantages of internal.
@evanatorx It's basically for balance. If there was just one it would be obvious that there were be stability issues. But using the NASA 747 Design for carrying shuttles would be too expensive, and not as efficient. I believe both "cockpits" are used. Also since the spaceship will de-attach during flight, this design better accommodates that need.
One side will hold the flight crew, and the other side will hold passengers on their 0-G training mission before their scheduled flight. After the aircraft launches the spacecraft, it will do a series of parabolic dives so that the trainees can experience 0-G before they go into space on the next mission.
it looks like an airplane with a Siamese twin
AaronISB 2 months ago
0:56 Runaway grandpa!
BritishPrashant 9 months ago
/watch?v=C3WqXp6QvW0
JavyMetal66 1 year ago
if it breaks in two, do you end up with 2 independent and airworthy aircraft?
pgjr00 1 year ago
@pgjr00 Haha Of course not, the wings wouldn't be even, but I'm assuming your joking.
ilion12345 8 months ago
Twin fuselage construction doesn't create a "weak spot" in the wing joint.. It's terribly important here not to think like the plane was lifted from one spot, as if it hangs from a lifting hook. When in flight, the lift distributes to the entire wing surface. The correct visualization is to rest the plane on sand bags by it's wings, instead of hanging the plane from it's wingtips or the center joint.
KarriKoivusalo 1 year ago
As for those asking why two fuselages, please consider this; the VSS Enterprise is quite a bit larger than SpaceShipOne was. If it was mounted under the fuselage, the entire plane would sit so high it would need a jumbo jet hangar. It would also still need the twin booms for the landing gear. It makes great sense to omit the central nacelle and instead use twin fuselage layout.
KarriKoivusalo 1 year ago
This all looks very 1950's to me. I can think of better designs for carrying the mother ship
cjellwood 1 year ago
Over and over people question -- why two fuselages...? I haven't seen a real answer, other than something like "Because they can". I suppose that's an adequate answer if you're Richard B.
ardenwarner 1 year ago
You can all ready buy tickets to go into space on this costing around £200,000
TheMitchy93 1 year ago
hope that middle wing is not glued on skew
videosouthafrica 1 year ago
snoopyloopy is smokin some craaazy stuff lol.
campbelldutch75 1 year ago
Holy crap there is a load of T-28's on the tarmac in the background. Impressive!
Not to mention the plane taking off too.
r32adt3db 1 year ago
my dad worked on ss2 it is awesome
i got to see it in real life
and i touched it
6525jacob 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Modern-day P-38. Nothing special..
Tata996 2 years ago
I have to disagree, look at how thin the wings look, and imagine it holding essentially a whole fuselage with 8 people in it. Not just a P-38. Although the concept is ideally the same.
scaremenga 2 years ago
its a siamese plane
loovusfrez 2 years ago 2
Epicness served with a side of win, would you like some awesome sauce with that?
The engines are really quiet, or is that just the vid?Can't wait to see it carry Spaceshiptwo
Lazybum450 2 years ago
so why did he hook up to planes?
bozy99 2 years ago
I went to the shwo to watch this. in the middle it will hold a pod that holds like 10 people and it will shoot it just out of the earth's atmposhphere and into space. but the tickets cost $200,000.
brianklumb13 2 years ago
The Virgin's owner is who sponsors Brawn GP,in the F1,right?
ique100 2 years ago
so are there two pilots?
Robusto94 2 years ago
I can imagine 2 pilots flying this plane and one decides to turn left while the other goes right! lol
gator966 2 years ago
This plane does not look structurally sound. The joining is really a small area.
Michael55443 2 years ago
I could imagine if it snaped in the middle the plane will go 360○
GameTechSupport 2 years ago
Awesome!
frequentairbusflyer8 2 years ago
Wow, you are in m y hometown! Iam going this weekend. Its fun in Oshkosh, as you never know what is going to fly over your house! My Dad drives one of the trams every year there, and he also does volunteer carpentry work. This is the first year he wont be bringing his Taylor craft and Citabria.
snowgirl1052 2 years ago
Can somebody remind me why there are two fuselages?
evanatorx 2 years ago
The space ship goes in the middle
airboyd 2 years ago
Yes, but why not on the bottom of a standard fuselage? Does the double fuselage airframe provide better aeronautic stability? Are both cockpits utilized?
evanatorx 2 years ago
It's a "twin boom" design. Essentially it's a symmetrical design to accommodate the payload. There may also be structural and aerodynamic reasons too. Rutan thinks outside the box. Although not the same, take a look at the P-38.
airboyd 2 years ago
There was also the Heinkel 111Z, also a twin boom design, which was used as a towplane for the glider version of the Gigant.
boomshanka 2 years ago
yea, it would either have to be carried under the wings like the usually do on fighters for drop payloads or internally like b-1 bomber. but if it's on only one wing, the other side has to be balanced. also, it may fly into remainder of plane on launch. ditto (to lesser degree) on internal. if internal, a larger plane has to be designed to hold the capsule. and does it load and release from rear or underneath? twin boom combines ease of wing loading & launch w/ balance advantages of internal.
snoopyloopy 2 years ago
@evanatorx because thre aint three
leklek69 1 year ago
@evanatorx It's basically for balance. If there was just one it would be obvious that there were be stability issues. But using the NASA 747 Design for carrying shuttles would be too expensive, and not as efficient. I believe both "cockpits" are used. Also since the spaceship will de-attach during flight, this design better accommodates that need.
ilion12345 8 months ago
@evanatorx
One side will hold the flight crew, and the other side will hold passengers on their 0-G training mission before their scheduled flight. After the aircraft launches the spacecraft, it will do a series of parabolic dives so that the trainees can experience 0-G before they go into space on the next mission.
TheGlaive123 6 months ago
This is fantastic. I look forward to hearing much more about this.
cattleman6420012000 2 years ago 3
Can't wait to see it in action.. Carrying people to space on demand. WOW!
Great footage.
guy014 2 years ago 3