Added: 4 years ago
From: Nephilim70
Views: 3,028
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (77)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 911 was an inside job. Jail to all pussy-hawks!

    They are ALL pussy-hawks! DEATH ROLL to ALL of them.

    TRAITORS!

  • this man is the greatest man the world has ever known

  • Olbermann is deflecting the truth behind 911, he is still a media cover up artist, for his corporate masters at NBC/GE. Bin Laden never claimed the attacks on the WTC, he is not even on the FBIs most wanted for 911. Bin Laden has been dead since 2001. Any vid. of him now is an obvious fake.

    Do not be suckered in by Keith Olbermann behind his speech is the veil of fear propaganda. By showing terrorists and Bin Laden in the background, MSNBC is promoting the fake terrorism fear machine.

  • What evidence do you have that Bin Laden has been dead since 2001??

  • Benazir Bhutto told the world twice that Sheik Omar had assassinated Bin Ladin,during her interview with David Frost just before she too was assassinated.

  • Ask Mr Bush who kept America in fear because of Personnel gain. The Billions of dollars that he rob us blind for 8 years, did he fix health care, did he raised taxes? the answer is because he was dead and they would not tell us about his death for fear of ruining the charadeand that charade is to rob the hard earned tax payers money.

  • Beautifully said Mr. Olbermann. Thank you for saying it.

  • Kieth Olbermann has the guys to go after the worst president this country has ever known. Everyday Kieth is on the air is a bad day for Bush and everyday Olbermann is on the air is another day closer to ending this pathetic adventure in Iraq. God Bless Keith Olbermann!

  • you go boy!keith!you edwin r. murrow jr. you!

  • Huge Gore campaign mistake which cost him some of those Nader voters at 1:03.

  • But I will tell you what. if you can get Mr boortz to respond to me publicly I will gladly blow holes threw any theory he might have! You I feel have no hope and there for are lost causes but at least we are almost rid of you and your kind. Soon you will die and people will know what what you and Mr. boortz had to say. and with the attitude you have people will cheer rather than morn.

  • what Mr happy has said is that he agrees with hitler folks he thinks we should get rid of a group of people completely! Thinks he should be able to play god!

  • lots of laughs happy but you aren`t fit to play shoe shine for the day buddy! you as your mr boortz aren`t even fit to walk among civilized humans. sorry to update you but we got rid of the third riech in the 40`s

  • So you really think population thining is the right thing to do?

  • by the way folks what happywallaby has failed to tell you is he is what we refer to as a warmonger he believes we should basically annihilate all Muslims I think that is wrong and don't condone him in anyway think his message is inherently flawed!

  • For the record I think Keith Olbermann is one of only two reporter's in the mainstream media that has the backbone to say what needs to be said! If you like him please also check out Lou Dobbs

  • sorry folk`s wasn`t talking about Keith in those last posts is conversation between me and happywallaby

  • I haven't heard anyone say he is not bias. but threw his arrogant stilted style he still say's things most main stream reporters are to chicken shit to say. witch is a crock of shit!

  • to mpost81: i've read messages saying that about rush limbaugh. odd, isn't it?

  • agreed but not from me I personaly like limbaugh I beleive he at least will stand up for what he beleives.

  • to mpost81: i'm inclined to agree. he places substance over style, usually.

  • Sorry just caught this one but no that is not what I said. Stands up for what HE believes not substance. Rather what he believes does not mean he is right but at least he can put together an argument and stick. To it unlike you Happy as I stated you can dance but your idea is without meaning because you will not stand behind it

  • to mpost81: i believe his arrogant, stilted style is all he has to convey. i doubt that it matters, but i'm a little disappointed you've resorted to chicken bowel function and crock contents.

  • Chicken bowel function and crock contents. Now that is funny lol.

  • happy that is about what I expected you Don`t have a leg to stand on. But I will give you credit you are an alright dancer

  • to mpost81: these messages aren't in order so i don't know exactly what you're responding to. obviously, you've never seen me dance.

  • meant dance around words and facts that do not support your theory

  • to mpost81: as before, i have no theory. i was mocking ubermann's style.

  • So you just wanted to mock him because you can? Has nothing to do with his argument at all?

  • to mpost81: you finally got it! i have some great insults lined up, but you need the practice. lay'em on me mp81.

  • That my friend is just about the stupidest thing I have ever heard! No intelligence what so ever! I am glad to say my kid has more sense than that at 3 years old. Suggest you listen for the pop that your head is inevitably going to make when it finely comes out of your ass. Think at 53 you should know better by now! But to your credit you are a prime example of the dumbing down of society.

  • Pissed me off so bad that I am smiling think it is hilarious all I can think about is a ditek commercial people are smart!

  • Well then come on you said I needed the practice and you had them lined up where are they?

  • Truthfully happy if I wanted any shit out of you I would run strait to Neal Boortz and scrape it off his dick! how is that for a insult

  • to mpost81: i guess anger management is out of the question, huh? the insult is common, hackneyed, pedestrian, other that, not bad. procede with mr. boortz as you wish, but i suspect he will object to your scraping. what's this about your kid? the only reason i've been so gentle and wasted so much time was because i thought you were a kid. as with ubermann, you take yourself too seriously, mp. don't exhibit this sort of language and behavior around your kid.

  • Don't you worry not to serious at all l. My kid's are very well taken care of! None of your concern is founded. But as far as Mr. boortz is concerned I wouldn't even talk to him he is a self conceited piece of shit. you site rush in the same context as that piece of shit I wonder what he would think of that?

  • to mpost81: we're straying into substance again. that was never my intent.

  • Sorry misunderstood you but really happy straying into substance? I Believe that is the backbone of all intelligent argument how could you not intend to touch on the substance of what he is saying?

  • to mpost81: for the hundredth time!...no, never mind.

  • Wait let me guess Bush did not start the war but the terrorist did huh.

  • to mpost81: well, yes. the world trade center incident came before the b52's over afghanistan.

  • now what does that have to do with Iraq?

  • to mpost81: nothing. you asked me about the initiator of the war.

  • I personaly was talking about war in Iraq

  • to mpost81: it's your fault you didn't say so. it's my fault i can't read your mind.

  • No I guess it is my fault for listening to Keith it is his opening statement Iraq war!

  • Well then I figure you must have a good theory let's hear it but as you can see as soon as you put others down you open yourself up to the same reticule

  • to mpost81: i put others down? have you read your own and the other messages to me?

  • to theophilus179: perhaps you could get someone to read aloud to you what i wrote. then repeat grades 2, 3, & 4, if indeed you have completed them before. finally, never sit down to a keyboard if you aren't sober. i anxiously await your next attempt. That was your post right?

  • Beautifully said GTelles. Hey, happywallaby perhaps you could get one of your friends to read that aloud to you.

  • to mpost81: this one is your weakest. you started out so well.

  • my weakest huh, it was your word's I just redirected them at you

  • to mpost81: i missed it, then.

  • thank you Mr Olbermann. American is falling apart at the seams and the Administration is oblivious to it.  Keep reminding us all of this disaster.

  • The boat is sinking...

  • My God, it was full of jews.

    Don't forget the role of AIPAC.

    More jews.

    NO war for Israel!

  • Well spoken by Keith, as usual. I agree with every single thing he said - Bush and cronies have suffered no consequences for selling us a phony, unnecessary war while ignoring the real one. I only hope one day we'll see justice served in the name of the American people, and these bastards rotting in jail, perhaps even being waterboarded under the torture statutes they themselves passed.

  • keith ubermann, keeping a countdown of days since mission accomplished; that's how the show got it's name. suffers delusions of adequacy. should have been fired, but msnbc is desperate. he says, "mendaciousness." try "mendacity," and i'm not even a journalist. writers have "worse, worser, worsest" spelling. this show is one reason democrats will never really work for the equal time doctrine.

  • typical republican,

    dont care about troops deaths or what the govt has done.

    blinded by party loyalty.

    heres to that awesome 30 something percent that still supports Bush!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    yay!!!!!!!!

  • to theophilus179: perhaps you could get someone to read aloud to you what i wrote. then repeat grades 2, 3, & 4, if indeed you have completed them before. finally, never sit down to a keyboard if you aren't sober. i anxiously await your next attempt.

  • Delusions of adequacy huh sound like you have your shit together. I can tell by the way you use the facts to keep the 2,3,and 4 graders at bay that you are very smart indeed. lol

  • By the way I anxiously await your next attempt go ahead but this time think before you type!

  • to mpost81: disappoing. not up to the quality of your previous message.

  • to mpost81: you're capable of better work. witness your first message.

  • mpost81: not bad. you've written in the style and cadence of ubermann himself. my first message was at least as sarcastic and irrelevant as uberman's tirade.

  • So what you are saying is because Keith misused a word or even made it up. Bush's failed policy is now irrelevant? I see then good point.

  • to mpost81: it has nothing to do with bush, and everything to do with ubermann. ubermann's use of this word is an example his failure even to be pedantic.

  • to mpost81: it has nothing to do with bush, and everything to do with ubermann. [there's "no such word as "mendaciousness." the word is an example of ubermann's failed pedantry.

  • to mpost81: not bad. you have uberman's style and cadence pegged. my original message was at least as arrogant and irrelevant as ubermann's.

  • Even if Keith were misusing "mendaciousness", which he wasn't (you should try one of those, you know, dictionaries)you haven't shown how that invalidates what he says. You simply can't because it's fallacious ad-hominem. And you certainly can't defend the crimes of this administration.

  • to gtelles: you missed the point entirely. the arrogant, stilted tone is ubermann-esque, however. i checked webster's seventh collegiate. still no such word as "mendaciousness." the word is an example of ubermann's failed pedantry.

  • Again what is your point Happy? Is it merely to prove Keith's English is not up to par with your own?

  • to mpost81: the point of my original message was to mimic ubermann's arrogant, stilted style. in my humble opinion, he places style over substance. it's possible i should thank you for the left-handed compliment about my english.

  • to mpost81: my point was to mimic ubermann's arrogant, stilted style. in my humble opinion ubermann places style over substance. i'm not sure, but i may owe you a "thank you" for the left-handed compliment about my english.

  • Style over substance sure I can buy that but still does not nagaite what he is saying.

  • to Gtelles: you've completly missed the point. the arrogant, stilted style is worthy of ubermann, however. i checked webster's seventh collegiate--still no such word as "mendaciousness." ubermann's use of this word is an example his failure even to be pedantic.

  • revolution next 9/11 2008 !!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more