It does stand out... even in New York. It's the building that has no answer. The building that the media ignores and the official report somehow omitted. "oh that building yeah... we only had time to investigate buildings that were 50 stories and larger, and I believe that building... aah what did you say it was?" Building 7. "yeah building 7 I believe was only 47 stories." :Oo
Yes, he ordered 19 terrorists to go to america and hijack planes that were already flying. And then ram them into three buildings that just so happened George W. Bush was planning on blowing up that day to start the war on terror. How convienient for the President that the day he was planning one of the biggest conspiracies in the history of human kind...all orchestrated by one of the dumbest presidents the country has ever had....Bin Laden was planning his terrorist attacks on the same day.
AE911truth,org, Plenty of professionals that say it is impossible for the official conspiracy theory to be real.
--------------
Dont you get taht these "professionals" and "engineers" are nut jobs too? Just because you are intelligent doesnt make you immune from also being a crackpot conspiracy theorist.
"Well there WERE 3 fucking planes crashing into buildings!? that MIGHT account for the collapse of the steel frames. I mean the historical evidence u have of steel buildings not collapsing by fire is PROBABLY not from a 50 ton mass accelerating at speeds of 300mph into a building. Learn some god damn physics"
--------------
What are you talking about? Giant jumbo plans crash into high rise building all the time. There is plenty of precedent! (sarcasm)
@Macker1283 And which 50 ton mass collided into building 7? Accelerate means to change in velocity over time. The plane was not likely accelerating until the point of impact. You should learn some god damn physics yourself.
@Macker1283 Not to burst your bubble, but you may want to read up on 9/11 before you try to argue it... Building 7 was not hit by a plane. Not even the media or government claims a plane hit it... geesh!
@GravityBoy72 They knew it would collapse because they are firefighters. It is, literally, part of their job to know when a building is structurally unstable due to damage.
Precedent means bupkis. No building over 40 stories has ever been bought down by CD, which makes it just as "impossible" as the official story.
@EGRJ Damn straight! I know I always refer to a building as "blowing up" when it collapses. I had a huge tree limb that fell on my house one time and the roof collapsed... I mean blew up; sorry.
@clayrains Yes, because one anonymous person using an incorrect term in the middle of a highly emotionally charged day is proof positive explosive charges were used, instead of them a)misspeaking, or b)simply being wrong about the building blowing up.
I note you ignored my point about buildings over 40 stories being bought down by CD.
So you are saying the BBC is in on it too? A station that has been even more anti-Bush than CNN. You ever come out of your basements and think, maybe they were saying the building was about to blow up because it was making sounds like it about to collapse? Like when a tree falls it makes cracking noises? No you wouldnt think that, because your then you would have to come to the realization that your lives which are based on crackpot conspiracy theories have been completely wasted.
And more the point, if the BBC was in on the conspiracy why would they blow it by announcing it before it happened? If you people stop to think about it you might realise how insane it all sounds.
The BBC is a state-owned corporation; may be you need to open your eyes. It might help to do a little research on how the BBC handled the build up to the 2nd Iraq war.
yeah and a tree makes cracking sounds cuz it is building up to a fall. someones head doesnt start slipping off before it gets suddenly chopped off by a guillotine. Just as suddenly was wtc 7 demolished in a controlled way
OK, questions have been raised. How did BBC know to broadcast WTC7 down half hr. before it fell, then cut-off live reporter so it would not be seen coming DOWN in real-time?? All American people want is answers.
power of the press release. it must have been put on a AP type feed. The announcement of the collapse of WTC7 is part of the official story so it would make sense that the mass media machine would be fed their lines. BBC just got the official word a tad too quick. Anomolies like this add up to a pile of evidence!
because we dont have freedom of speech anymore as that would be inciting a riot, which is a misdemeanor. and, according to the "patriot" act, any one who has committed a misdemeanor is considered a terrorist. thus, if you use your freedoms, you are a terrorist. and off course they cut it off the air, everything has to be censored. welcome to the brave new world.
OK, questions have been raised. How did BBC know to broadcast WTC7 down half hr. before it fell, then cut-off live reporter so it would not be seen coming in real-time?? All American people want is answers.
The 9/11 Conspiracy Movement is led by nothing more than a bunch of morons who have little or no knowledge of engineering and science. "About to blow up" is normal phraseology for a building on fire that looks dangerously unstable - especially in today's world with everything blowing up in Hollywood action films.
what u r saying is that, u got shot 9 times, near death level, but survive; people are accusing u of trying to get hurt ON purpose to have a long vaction off from work and collect unemployment money...
stfu!! stop bs about inside job... and conspiracy!! if it was ever logically "Proven" without a doubt, then United States would be taking the consequence already.. stop riding on the band wagon punk!!
I've never heard of a building demolition referred to as being "blown up"... always "demolished" or "imploded". Trust me, if the gov't wanted to blow it up, they could've spun it to say that it was because the building was unstable and needed to come down safely.
By the way, no other steel buildings endured what that building had, so don't compare it to other fires, jerkoff.
Larry Silverstein, owner of the WTC complex said WTC was "pulled." The fires in WTC 7 were minimal. Firefighters were pulled out around 11:30am I believe and never entered again. Besides, no steel framed buildings (besides WTC 1 and 2) ever collapsed due to fire,ever. The government could HAVE NEVER spun it to say the building was unstable and needed to come down safely for the simple fact the it takes weeks to properly place demolitions.
If you don't believe that the government had anything to do with the WTC buildings collapsing then do a search online and find out where is the steel and debri, the planes, the engines, and the black boxes from all 4 planes?
@PremaritalSexXM Really?! See, those emergency crews didn't use the proper word for "blow up" right before the building blew up, so it didn't blow up! I love seeing debunkers have to deal with clips like these. They're avoid what's what's right in their faces like a cat when you're trying to shove their nose in shit.
No other steel frame buildings in history have collasped by fire. 3 in 1 day!?! Alex Jones has about 75 police and firemen on record about pre-warnings. There was even a 10 second countdown reported from several sources.
Well there WERE 3 fucking planes crashing into buildings!? that MIGHT account for the collapse of the steel frames. I mean the historical evidence u have of steel buildings not collapsing by fire is PROBABLY not from a 50 ton mass accelerating at speeds of 300mph into a building. Learn some god damn physics
technically yea, i suppose...but other than the towers, no other steel buildings have collapsed "due to fire" so they have no reason to talk like that....the fires were minimal and there are other news clips of firefighters saying "they told us there blowing it up get away"
Oh and your little deal with "no other steel buildings have collapsed 'due to fire'"... are you forgetting that WTC 7 was severely damaged by the collapse of WTC 1 & 2?? ..and that the fire afterwards worsened the situation?
I mean the *could* have, is it probable? Not really. Is it probable on top of everything else including the video coming out of them announcing the collapse 23 minutes early & then the videos of it were pulled from Google immediately? Not at all.
Inside job, no fucking doubt!
bongojim420 9 months ago
It does stand out... even in New York. It's the building that has no answer. The building that the media ignores and the official report somehow omitted. "oh that building yeah... we only had time to investigate buildings that were 50 stories and larger, and I believe that building... aah what did you say it was?" Building 7. "yeah building 7 I believe was only 47 stories." :Oo
DanieljDixon 2 years ago
Yes, he ordered 19 terrorists to go to america and hijack planes that were already flying. And then ram them into three buildings that just so happened George W. Bush was planning on blowing up that day to start the war on terror. How convienient for the President that the day he was planning one of the biggest conspiracies in the history of human kind...all orchestrated by one of the dumbest presidents the country has ever had....Bin Laden was planning his terrorist attacks on the same day.
Macker1283 3 years ago
@Macker1283 You are obviously one of the dumbest viewers of youtube that this country has ever had.
cunnidvd 2 years ago
AE911truth,org, Plenty of professionals that say it is impossible for the official conspiracy theory to be real.
--------------
Dont you get taht these "professionals" and "engineers" are nut jobs too? Just because you are intelligent doesnt make you immune from also being a crackpot conspiracy theorist.
Macker1283 3 years ago
"Well there WERE 3 fucking planes crashing into buildings!? that MIGHT account for the collapse of the steel frames. I mean the historical evidence u have of steel buildings not collapsing by fire is PROBABLY not from a 50 ton mass accelerating at speeds of 300mph into a building. Learn some god damn physics"
--------------
What are you talking about? Giant jumbo plans crash into high rise building all the time. There is plenty of precedent! (sarcasm)
Macker1283 3 years ago
@Macker1283 And which 50 ton mass collided into building 7? Accelerate means to change in velocity over time. The plane was not likely accelerating until the point of impact. You should learn some god damn physics yourself.
cunnidvd 2 years ago
@Macker1283 I guess that while the entire world watched no one saw the third plane crash into WTC7.
cunnidvd 2 years ago
@Macker1283 Not to burst your bubble, but you may want to read up on 9/11 before you try to argue it... Building 7 was not hit by a plane. Not even the media or government claims a plane hit it... geesh!
clayrains 2 months ago
We are so fucked, here in Amerika!
piasillo 4 years ago
How could anyone know it would collapse?
There is no precendent.
Even NIST struggles to explain it.
But these people knew.
How?
GravityBoy72 4 years ago
@GravityBoy72 They knew it would collapse because they are firefighters. It is, literally, part of their job to know when a building is structurally unstable due to damage.
Precedent means bupkis. No building over 40 stories has ever been bought down by CD, which makes it just as "impossible" as the official story.
EGRJ 9 months ago
@EGRJ Damn straight! I know I always refer to a building as "blowing up" when it collapses. I had a huge tree limb that fell on my house one time and the roof collapsed... I mean blew up; sorry.
clayrains 2 months ago
@clayrains Yes, because one anonymous person using an incorrect term in the middle of a highly emotionally charged day is proof positive explosive charges were used, instead of them a)misspeaking, or b)simply being wrong about the building blowing up.
I note you ignored my point about buildings over 40 stories being bought down by CD.
EGRJ 2 months ago
So you are saying the BBC is in on it too? A station that has been even more anti-Bush than CNN. You ever come out of your basements and think, maybe they were saying the building was about to blow up because it was making sounds like it about to collapse? Like when a tree falls it makes cracking noises? No you wouldnt think that, because your then you would have to come to the realization that your lives which are based on crackpot conspiracy theories have been completely wasted.
Macker1283 4 years ago
And more the point, if the BBC was in on the conspiracy why would they blow it by announcing it before it happened? If you people stop to think about it you might realise how insane it all sounds.
rhyslings 4 years ago
What is insane is that the building went down at all. Grow up. Jesus is watching. His Kingdom is coming in even now.
DeanCo7777 4 years ago
The BBC is a state-owned corporation; may be you need to open your eyes. It might help to do a little research on how the BBC handled the build up to the 2nd Iraq war.
peepnklown 3 years ago
yeah and a tree makes cracking sounds cuz it is building up to a fall. someones head doesnt start slipping off before it gets suddenly chopped off by a guillotine. Just as suddenly was wtc 7 demolished in a controlled way
PunkasFuck007 3 years ago
OK, questions have been raised. How did BBC know to broadcast WTC7 down half hr. before it fell, then cut-off live reporter so it would not be seen coming DOWN in real-time?? All American people want is answers.
annaleee69 4 years ago 2
power of the press release. it must have been put on a AP type feed. The announcement of the collapse of WTC7 is part of the official story so it would make sense that the mass media machine would be fed their lines. BBC just got the official word a tad too quick. Anomolies like this add up to a pile of evidence!
clovercouple 4 years ago
because we dont have freedom of speech anymore as that would be inciting a riot, which is a misdemeanor. and, according to the "patriot" act, any one who has committed a misdemeanor is considered a terrorist. thus, if you use your freedoms, you are a terrorist. and off course they cut it off the air, everything has to be censored. welcome to the brave new world.
PunkasFuck007 3 years ago
OK, questions have been raised. How did BBC know to broadcast WTC7 down half hr. before it fell, then cut-off live reporter so it would not be seen coming in real-time?? All American people want is answers.
annaleee69 4 years ago
The 9/11 Conspiracy Movement is led by nothing more than a bunch of morons who have little or no knowledge of engineering and science. "About to blow up" is normal phraseology for a building on fire that looks dangerously unstable - especially in today's world with everything blowing up in Hollywood action films.
USAFDude1988 4 years ago
what u r saying is that, u got shot 9 times, near death level, but survive; people are accusing u of trying to get hurt ON purpose to have a long vaction off from work and collect unemployment money...
tnguyen603 4 years ago
stfu!! stop bs about inside job... and conspiracy!! if it was ever logically "Proven" without a doubt, then United States would be taking the consequence already.. stop riding on the band wagon punk!!
tnguyen603 4 years ago
I've never heard of a building demolition referred to as being "blown up"... always "demolished" or "imploded". Trust me, if the gov't wanted to blow it up, they could've spun it to say that it was because the building was unstable and needed to come down safely.
By the way, no other steel buildings endured what that building had, so don't compare it to other fires, jerkoff.
PremaritalSexXM 5 years ago
Larry Silverstein, owner of the WTC complex said WTC was "pulled." The fires in WTC 7 were minimal. Firefighters were pulled out around 11:30am I believe and never entered again. Besides, no steel framed buildings (besides WTC 1 and 2) ever collapsed due to fire,ever. The government could HAVE NEVER spun it to say the building was unstable and needed to come down safely for the simple fact the it takes weeks to properly place demolitions.
RealWorldNewsNetwork 5 years ago
@RealWorldNewsNetwork No steel-framed buildings over 40 stories have ever been bought down in a controlled demo, either.
WTC 1 and 2 didn't collapse due to fire. They collapsed due to fire and a plane impact.
EGRJ 9 months ago
If you don't believe that the government had anything to do with the WTC buildings collapsing then do a search online and find out where is the steel and debri, the planes, the engines, and the black boxes from all 4 planes?
SENTONE1 4 years ago
@PremaritalSexXM Really?! See, those emergency crews didn't use the proper word for "blow up" right before the building blew up, so it didn't blow up! I love seeing debunkers have to deal with clips like these. They're avoid what's what's right in their faces like a cat when you're trying to shove their nose in shit.
clayrains 2 months ago
No other steel frame buildings in history have collasped by fire. 3 in 1 day!?! Alex Jones has about 75 police and firemen on record about pre-warnings. There was even a 10 second countdown reported from several sources.
QueenNidian 5 years ago
Well there WERE 3 fucking planes crashing into buildings!? that MIGHT account for the collapse of the steel frames. I mean the historical evidence u have of steel buildings not collapsing by fire is PROBABLY not from a 50 ton mass accelerating at speeds of 300mph into a building. Learn some god damn physics
BabyQuan89 4 years ago
@BabyQuan89 There were only two planes that crashed on 9/11 in New York. Get your basic facts straight.
clayrains 2 months ago
technically yea, i suppose...but other than the towers, no other steel buildings have collapsed "due to fire" so they have no reason to talk like that....the fires were minimal and there are other news clips of firefighters saying "they told us there blowing it up get away"
RealWorldNewsNetwork 5 years ago
"Other" clips? Or just your imagination.
Oh and your little deal with "no other steel buildings have collapsed 'due to fire'"... are you forgetting that WTC 7 was severely damaged by the collapse of WTC 1 & 2?? ..and that the fire afterwards worsened the situation?
USAFDude1988 4 years ago
Couldn't they just mean "Blow up" as in "fire is out of control, it's all gonne blow up, get out of the way"? I've heard firefighters talk like that.
neon1974 5 years ago
I mean the *could* have, is it probable? Not really. Is it probable on top of everything else including the video coming out of them announcing the collapse 23 minutes early & then the videos of it were pulled from Google immediately? Not at all.
DaveIrie 5 years ago