Added: 1 year ago
From: RemingtonDefense
Views: 47,741
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (98)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • love that gun

  • If you know alot about weapons right away you would notice that the ACR it's similar to the British Army SA80 A2 Rifle and LMG... The working parts are pretty much the same... Anyway great video.

  • cool fake gun

    

  • this is my dream gun!

  • THIS RIFLE SHOULD BE STANDARD ISSUE TO FRONTLINE INFINTRY AND SPEC OPS TROOPS. I WAS A BIG FAN OF THE BARRET REC 7 AND THE HK 416/417, BUT THIS RIFLE BEATS THEM ALL IN SPADES. GIMME ONE IN 7.62 NATO/6.8SPC AND IM HAPPY. THIS WEAPON MAKES MADE IN AMERICA SOMETHING TO BE PROUD OF AGAIN.

  • I thought Colt had more than 6 workers...

  • that is an amazing video

  • I LOVE!! THE ACR! my favorite weapon FOREVER!!

  • I like how the bushmaster acr can change its load out from a NATO 5.56 to a 7.62 very easily I like the options

  • most epic video ever

  • @jockojonson17 ya I'm with the slappy,you should stick to playing video games there's a huge difference between a controller and an actual gun

  • Is there any improvements from Bushmaster's to Remington's?

  • @jockojonson17 must be fun being that rich...

  • That's such a sexy rifle why hasn't it replaced the m16 and m4 in the military completely?

  • Hey guys the U.S. Navy has more people than the top 17 navys COMBINED

  • Someone leveled this ACR to max level and got the Gold finish. Nice. Anyway, this is probably my favorite AR in MW3. I may buy one irl just because I like it in the game.

  • @jockojonson17 Fucking cod gamer. You think all there is to guns is pull the trigger? And get one cus you like it? You couldnt afford it , and even if you did youd blow it up on the first pull of the trigger ,

  • @xSlappyTheSealx Uhh the Bushmaster ACR costs $2600 to $3000. That is not a lot of money. Most people could afford one easily.

  • Looks like a g36 bolt carrier....

  • @agentkapser optics, flashlights, etc...

  • what the hell is the battery for

  • funny how they had a loud gun sound when theres a silencer on the acr 0-o

  • @TheLigitGamerrrrr These aren't your little video games or movies were silencers seem fancy and are as quiet as a kitty dropping on a pillow.When a weapon has a silencer it can still be loud.

  • @bedvd01 well yes but ive been on a shooting range before and ive heard a 5.56 round being fired and its just as loud unsupressed as the supressed acr, and why would you care, i was trying to makle a joke

  • Comment removed

  • @GiggsRUs hahaha nice

  • hey, we germans build the best weapons, not russians and not americans

  • @mrshman333 I never said Americans made the best guns......

  • ak-200 is better

  • @erer270 Shut up and fire a real gun.

  • @bedvd01 what?!

  • @erer270 Everyone knows Americans make better weapons than Russians.

  • @bedvd01 really? prove it!

  • @erer270 Okay,well if Russians make better weapons then why does one of the worlds best special forces use the M4A1 rather than the AK-47?What about the Scar-H and Scar-L?Desert Eagle handgun?CheyTac Intervention?Also America has the best military on the planet and we don't use Russian weapons.How are these weapons not lovable?AR-15,Colt.M1911.AK-47 is NOT reliable at all times and this is the weapon that Russians mainly use.Also many weapon professionals chose American firearms more.

  • @bedvd01 one russia does not use the ak-47.they haven't uesed it for 60 years.no it is more reliable than many weapons today.u cant prove that the usa has the strongest military on the planet.spec ops dont use the ak-47 because it is out of date

  • @erer270 Actually it's been proven and it's a fact the the U.S. has the strongest military on the planet.First of all the U.S. Military spends the most money on war then any other country.We have the best military technology and well trained soldiers.U.S. has the most feared Navy on the planet.Russia is not as powerful as they used to be.Also no the AK-47 is not the most reliable gun,because what are you going to do in long range with the AK-47?German and American weapons FTW.

  • @bedvd01 Too bad we aren't the smartest when it comes to using it sometimes. Strong ass military fighting for dumb reasons sometimes yo

  • @jeromethebuffgnome So protecting the Afghans from being taken over by Taliban is a dumb reason?The only war I agree that was dumb was the war for oil.

  • @bedvd01 no when they face a real enemy and win then they are.them spendin the most mean it cost the most.range has nothing to do with reliablety and it is very reliable.and usa is not the most feared.

  • @erer270 What are you talking about face a real enemy?We have faced many REAL enemys.War isn't a game,also I never said the USA is the most feared their Navy is.

  • @bedvd01 the Taliban aint a real enemy.no shit war inst a game.russia does not fear our navy

  • @erer270 Really?So basically your putting one enemy as an example of a non-real enemy?What about other wars back,think about what you say you moron.Don't use one enemy as a back up.

  • @bedvd01 we lost the Vietnam war.desert storm wasn't even a fair fight.didnt ww2 by ourselves. Iraq had no chance.

  • @erer270 No we didn't lost Vietnam war.Also yeah we didn't fight WW2 alone but we kicked in didn't we?Also in WW2 we destroyed the entire Japanese Navy and basically made Japan surrender.Saying the Gulf War wasn't a fair fight is like saying WWII wasn't a fair fight.

  • Comment removed

  • in Vietnam we left the country and the nva took over south Vietnam so nato lost witch means we lost.japan lost because they didnt invade pearl harbor when they had chance.in the gulf war it was all of nata vs iraq hence not fair

  • @erer270 Wrong the Vietnam War was a police act.It was never our war to begin with since South Vietnam called for help we went in.We were doing just fine in Vietnam but we pulled out due to economic pressure,so we didn't win or lose.Also Japan did successfully invade Pearl Harbor and killed innocent people.Russia has a good army but they aren't as powerful as they used to be.Anyways I honsetly don't want to argue about which countrys military is better.

  • @bedvd01 well if you give an opinion on such a heated subject like vietnam, your going to start an argument. yes we probably would be fine but we put 17 year old boys to basicly fight in the most hostile country in all of southern asia with no prior critical training besides "point, and shoot"

  • @erer270 Military's are made to protect a country not for competition.By the way sorry I called you a moron earlier.Russia can't do shit to us though because we could beat the crap and destory each other.Especially if we both launched Nuclear Missiles at each other,in fact if we both had a nuclear war than it might pretty much be the end of the world.To be honest I hope the USA and Russia become allies one day,President Barack Obama does have a good relationship with Dmitry Medvedev.

  • @bedvd01 with invade im mean troops and russia out numbers our troops 20 to 1

  • @erer270 Russia wouldn't succeed if they invaded the U.S.A.

  • @bedvd01 thats an opinion

  • @erer270 Not it's the truth.Russia would have a REALLY hard time getting to the U.S.

  • @bedvd01 alaska then the to the usa canda cant stop them

  • @bedvd01 how so?

  • @erer270 Well first of all Russia won't be able to pass our Navy because they would be shot down before they even see our Navy.So the only way they could get through is by going through Alaska,when they go through Alaska they would have to pass Canada but Canada wouldn't want Russia just passing by with dangerous planes and such.Canada would jump in the war making it Canada & America vs Russia,don't underistemate Canada's army,Even if Russia would win........

  • @bedvd01 Haha, "russia, US ..bla bla" :D come on, played too much games lately?

  • @erer270 They would have to face all of America's soldiers and militias would most likely form.So this means Canada,Militias and American Military vs Russia.Therefore Russia wouldn't stand a chance.

  • @bedvd01 they could take down our navy.canda has a shit stan army.

  • @erer270 No,our Navy is too powerful.They could pass our Navy BUT the chances of that happening are really low.No Canada has a decent army also the UK is like America's mother so I think the UK would probably chip in and help.Like I said before,Russia was never really powerful and they weren't as powerful as they used to be.America has the best army,China takes 2nd place for best army and Russia takes 3rd.

  • @bedvd01 they have torpedoes that goes like 800mph. wouldnt china help russia?

  • @erer270 Torpedo's can easily be countered.Also NO China wouldn't help because China needs us and we need them.If we had a war with China and if China won then what good did it do?They would still be screwed,we are the main reason they have a lot of money.

  • @bedvd01 china would help them there allies

  • @erer270 Then that would be a big mistake made by China.

  • @bedvd01 they live

  • @erer270 and go debt.

  • Freakin' sweet!!

  • hahahah mid battle: god dammit im out of juice, anyone got spare batteries

    nice vid btw

  • Love these things. Hope they replace the M-4/16 with them.

  • it really is worthy of the name adaptive combat rifle.

  • @Punisher1990, that was a CR123 battery, the Eotech sight runs on that battery, they are just pointing out storage space in the grip ala; most magpul grips have this feature so if you are on mission and your reticle dies you have a spare battery. The dude with the comment on the electrified rails was just toasting you. By the way this is a video of the Remington military only version, not the Bushmaster you can buy as a civy. There are differences in the two. Read the title guys.

  • 1:31 Durecell, trusted everywhere.

    It just happens that the battery is a durecell.

  • its an Ar-15 derivate witz the reliable of an AK, great job bushmaster

  • @ramb0nat0r it's not as reliable as you think. And Magpul did the job, not Bushmaster/Remington.

  • Wait... What was the AA battery in the pistol grip for?

  • @punisher1990 There are plans to introduce rails that provide electric current to optics and other accessories that need batteries. Even if you have regular rails, extra batteries are always good.

  • @bf2lover42 Sweet! Thanks for the heads up, tis a good idea.

  • Attach a suppressor gun still loud.

    im bringing that to my stealth mission

  • @DuskCrunch180 >has no idea how silencers work and complains about a promotional video

    get off youtube...

  • @bf2lover42 >does not know that my little comment was a joke.

  • @DuskCrunch180 >doesn't know jokes have to be funny

  • @bf2lover42 I don't understand your sentence. :|

  • I love this gun

  • мне нравится

  • nicely made animation indeed....... i love this.. "thing".... <3

  • This honestly makes me want to work for a company like magpul. The amount of innovation this has is nuts.

  • If only my country's government wasn't scared of guns.

    And I had $2000

  • Nice Animation!

  • the gun uses a battery

    

  • Nice Vid.

  • really? sloppy seconds?

  • uhhhh 1st

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more