I myself have tried agnula out a tiny bit once. It seems to have quite alot of preinstalled audio software. Agnula from is probably the best audio-oriented linux distribution I've come across. However, their website says that they have stopped working on it. Ubuntu studio is very popular and very active but its geared towards multimedia in general, not just audio.
@delirio1987 I totally agree. I recently made a change from 64 Studio to Ubuntu Studio, and I have been having nothing but performance issues. I will be switching back to 64 Studio as soon as I can.
@bassistguy hi man, just a stupid question: in 64studio you have synaptic? Because I don't really see myself installing stuff in any other way (noob here?
modern linux audio basically consists of a few components: ALSA (hardware access), jack (application connectivity), LADSPA (application plugins). applications available, among many others, are: ardour (recording), rosegarden4 (cubase-like sequencer), hydrogen (drums). many linux distros offer these packages - ubuntu, fedora, etc.
dynebolic (among others) is a ready-to-run boot-CD with all stuff preconfigured and many more applications, try google and download. have fun :-)
Best audio editor for me: Linux Multimedia Studio (similar to FL Studio)
this looks more like a poor cubase
Pakito15191 1 year ago
Wheres The Audio??
Fizwhizbiz 3 years ago 33
Thanx for the video, I'm going to try it immediately.:o)
Have you ever tried AGNULA?
(I'm just new in this "world" and I am looking for the best audio editor suite I can find)
carloq8 4 years ago
I myself have tried agnula out a tiny bit once. It seems to have quite alot of preinstalled audio software. Agnula from is probably the best audio-oriented linux distribution I've come across. However, their website says that they have stopped working on it. Ubuntu studio is very popular and very active but its geared towards multimedia in general, not just audio.
ralphbluecoat 3 years ago
thanks :)
carloq8 3 years ago
you awnsered my question too.
locobeis 3 years ago
imho 64 studio is the best
delirio1987 3 years ago 3
@delirio1987 I totally agree. I recently made a change from 64 Studio to Ubuntu Studio, and I have been having nothing but performance issues. I will be switching back to 64 Studio as soon as I can.
bassistguy 1 year ago
@bassistguy hi man, just a stupid question: in 64studio you have synaptic? Because I don't really see myself installing stuff in any other way (noob here?
MaghoxFr 1 year ago
@MaghoxFr I can't remember if it was installed by default or not, but I have it installed, and use it.
bassistguy 1 year ago
@bassistguy Great, thanks, i think I will give 64studio a try, for all I've heard it runs pretty smoothly
MaghoxFr 1 year ago
I would really like to know more about ubuntu audio. Can you recommend a good source of information? How did you learn about all of this?
snezegard 4 years ago
Triple-w dot ubuntustudio dot org, for starters. Have fun.
Xubuntu47 4 years ago
try ubuntu studio
cronocopio 3 years ago
@snezegard:
modern linux audio basically consists of a few components: ALSA (hardware access), jack (application connectivity), LADSPA (application plugins). applications available, among many others, are: ardour (recording), rosegarden4 (cubase-like sequencer), hydrogen (drums). many linux distros offer these packages - ubuntu, fedora, etc.
dynebolic (among others) is a ready-to-run boot-CD with all stuff preconfigured and many more applications, try google and download. have fun :-)
romaneberle 3 years ago