KJV Onlyism is perfectly defined in the YouTube video King James Follies 5. It is like taking a trip to Disney World and fawning over the sign and claiming it is the one true sign to Disney World and all other signs are plots set up by Sea World to deceive you. If you base your faith on a translation rather than the Almighty Creator through the Messiah, you have established an idol as your focus of worship regardless of how you explain otherwise. Think about it.
While KJV is a fine translation and does illustrate that through repentance and living according to the standard of righteousness established by יהוה, known as the Torah, is what establishes redemption and enduring to the end establishes salvation, just as many other translations also do, the KJV is not unpolluted as I explained in my previous post. Continuing...
To make the claim unpolluted means you are saying something is without error, flaw, or personal interpretation. The KJV is certainly not unpolluted since all 3 apply (the 3rd being there was a known drunkard on the translation team that was not cast out and Erasmus was a devoted Roman Catholic). Furthermore, MasoreticVsKJV addresses a number of errors made by the KJV or shows how they used sources OTHER than Textus Receptus such as the Septuagint. Continuing...
to all you kjv fanatics........ your about retarded.... your argument of, this is the version that god gave us....yeah.... you MIGHT wanna do a tad bit more studying. your the exact people that picket and do these outlandish riots towards people you know nothing of, judge people when it goes against your belief, and turn people off towards the word of god.
The changes in these new bible perversions is designed to attack basic Biblical doctrines. You cannot witness to a Jehovah's witness' with them because they contain the same errors.
America began in the city named after King James- meaning Jamestown, Virginia. And this is a sign. See the Aimed At America 3 video because these Scripture parallels will only manifest in the King James Bible!
It's the same argument I have had with the JWs. What is God not powerful enough to do? If Satan can change God's word then Satan wins. But was we know from the Book of Revelations we win because the Lamb will send Satan and his demon and false teacher into the Lake of Fire
@suggesttwo Uh...wrong. Finding more manuscripts means nothing. We have found MANY more manuscripts since 1604, and the ones that agree with the Textus Receptus numbers far more than those that agree with the Minority Text. Your Bible uses the Minority Text, and the manuscripts used for your heretical NWT do not agree with each other completely. The Textus Receptus, however, disagrees ONLY in the spelling of certain names/places. Do some research into your NWT. You'll change to the KJV.
I'm almost complete with reading the NWT. What a terrible Bible. More difficult to understand than the KJV. Despite all efforts to remove the Deity of Christ, I'm MORE convinced that Jesus is God from reading the NWT. The NWT hides accurate renderings of verses in the footnotes.
Look at the footnotes and cross-references in the Reference Bible of the NWT... it proves Jesus is God.
The KJV is inspired by Luthers translation. Its good in many ways but have its flaws. If you believe one is 100% accurate in comparison with any old original manuscript i hope you find that verision :) If you don't find that 100% Bible or think so and let that put doubt in you in any way regarding Yashuah as your saviour or Yhwh as our heavenly father then you rationalise to much..
Isaiah 55:8 " the Lord’s ways are not our ways, and His thoughts are not our thoughts!
Regarding the jots mentioned (actually these corresponded the letter Y) :The KJV removes all the Hebrew letter jots in its use of English words. Furthermore, since the Hebrew and Greek words originally used had semantic ranges and nuances that did not directly correspond to English equivalents, such a translation must have shaved off not just literal jots but real elements of meaning with them. Just think how difficult ti would be to make sure that similar sounding/looking words carried over.
Finally, the word church comes from the Greek word circe, which is the foundation of the word circus. Church also refers to a pagan temple where heathen worship their false mighty ones. So unless your pastor is a ring leader and the administration are the stage hands, or you are part of a pagan temple of heathen worship, the Bride of the Messiah is an assembly of believers, and true believers observe all of the commands of יהוה that apply to them found in the Torah.
To continue, the KJV is not unpolluted, and neither are the militant individuals who call all other translations as lies and errant as well as calling anyone who reads them as deceived. The Geneva Bible, the Bishops Bible and the Tyndale translation all came before KJV in English, and the KJV translators used information from at least two of these sources when performing the translation. Another error in KJV is the improper translating of ekklesia to church when it means assembly.
Listen, KJV is a beautiful poetic translation, but it is not without errors. The eternal Creator's name of יהוה was never meant to be replaced with LORD. Zechariah 12:10 is one of many verses that is also improperly translated when the JPS has a more accurate translation of the middle part, "and they shall look unto Me because they have thrust him through". Another error in KJV is Psalms 12:7, which should have preserve us from this generation forever in the end part of the verse.
The original King James Version bible is under attack because it is the only true bible that God gave to us people of our days and there is no problems with it. People who serve the devil is against this bible and they have created all these different versions that are orchestrated by satan to cause confusion and destruction of the truth. Those who change the king James version is going to hell
@crazydaysful: The KJV is under attack because some Christians are able to use the brains God gave them and they can research and see for themselves the history of this erroneous version. And it is quite unchristian like to call people devil servers because they don't agree with your particular brand of Bible. That is extremely judgemental and dangerous and it is exactly why religious people get a bad reputation for being looneys. We don't all have small and closed minds.
@zoeyjusko - the original King James Version is under attack by liars and fake servers of Christ like you. Jesus said to be aware of those wolves in sheeps clothing and you are one. You are of the devil and you are talking to the wrong the person when you talk to me because I am very wise in the truths of God. Christians who get a bad rep for being looneys are fake Christians. You are of the devil and God is going to deal with you soon!
"People who serve the devil is against this bible and they have created all these different versions that are orchestrated by satan to cause confusion and destruction of the truth. "
=======
AMEN. Satan is the father of lies and the author of confusion. It makes PERFECT sense that Satan would attack the Bible so as to paralyze those who are seeking to draw closer to God with uncertainty as to which translation to trust.
@FearNoWeapon777 one of my favourite ways to clearify an issue was reading the whole passage was to read other translations. Then I found a program with the hebrew/greek word attached to KJV text. before that I would rely on study notes in my study bible. When I got my first full bible I did not understand it, NKJV or NIV. I would read a verse and see wht it meant in the notes. I was clueless and if I would have bee given a KGV with no notes I don't think I would be a Christain today.
@crazydaysful zoeyjuskoIf they read and don't understand waht good is that? I just learned 2 days ago that a cherubum is an angel not a peice of furnature in the tabernacle on the OT. If they used the word angel I would have understood. This is exactly how people get religous not saved. When I was a child do you know how may time I said "Amen" not knowing it meant "I believe!"? How many times I promised to repent not knowing I had to change in my ex (Catholic) church?
@crazydaysful I hope that there's a heaven, And if there is, we'll all be there, That probably there's not, doesn't make me despair, If there was a good God, there would be no hell, If there was a loving God all would turn out well, But probably God's are imaginary! A failed hypothesis! How am I going to experience anything, When I've turned back into dust? see Job 14v10-14, Eccles 3v19 Man's fate is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both. All have the same spirit / breath.
The king james is one of the the worst versions you could possibly use. It was translated using lower quality inferior manuscripts. Other versions like NSRV go back to the oldest known manuscripts. Although to be honest, in my opinion it really makes little difference in my opinion, unless you are a literalistic fundamentalist. This topic is far larger than this and not at all simple.
@TheMessanjah Our purpose on Earth is not to spread the gospel. Our purpose is to glorify God. That's why man was created in the first place. While spreading the gospel is important it's just one of the ways God is glorified. Having correct doctrine is equally important.
No it is not. We cannot see God. The best way to have a relationship with God is to understand what it is that God wishes for us...how can one spread the gospel if one doesn't know or if one is not certain as to what it is? God's Word is the beginning of Christian growth- but satan attacks this foundation by making people DOUBT God's Word- leading people to doubt God's existence. Afterall, if God cannot protect his word then is he really all-powerful?
@TheMessanjah true, but if you have a alse version of the Bible, then what message are yu gonna spread? a falsified message?
i think it is important for us Christians to preach the correct word to lead people to the truth, not corrupted teachings...is that too extreme? hhhhh !!bless
man changed the bible its documented in so many diffrent areas!!!!!! There was no 1 coming up from under the earth changing words in a book with few refrences to the thing or idea called a "devil." Stop with the drugs son!
The KJV added words to the bible. In the early and many later editions there are words in italics. Those are ones that the translators added to make sense out of the text.
@Naiant You don't know the history of the Bible. There are over 64,000 manuscripts backing the KJV, while there are only 3 manuscripts for all modern translations. These 64,000 manuscripts prove and back up the authenticity of the KJV. Do you even know the process that was used to translate the manuscripts into English? If not its a great place to start understanding the truly inspired word of God; The Kings James Version
KJV-1611 is best for what an English speaking human can get their hands on and read. But I would recommend getting knowledge of a christian martyr named William Tyndale, he did finish the whole old testament(Genesis-2Chronicles) and the entire new testament which where used to write the KJV-1611. Just check out the Thomas Matthew Bible- 1539 it's hard to read but I always said, "I would rather hear the words of a martyr than the words of a ManKing." JKV-1611 is great- but Tyndale is greater.
That symbol on the kjv bible is the same one that deicide has on their cd once upon a cross...it is evil...why else would they have that symbol...its on other satanic rings and necklaces to...i saw them on the internet...and instead of saying god in that version they say him...him is not my god him can be anyone
I'm a Christian but its suspicious all this KJV stuff because 777 are the the divine numbers from the"Book of Law"by Aliester Crowley.You can see that the movie"Book of Eli"its just an anagram of "Book of Lie"refering to the KJV in the movie, so Book of Eli/Lie/Law its refering to Aliester Crowley's book & if you see the roots of Gail Riplinger(KJV defender),i mean she studied on the illuminati oxford university,so i think KJV is like Thelema Crowley's teachings disguised with a Christian cover
I'm sorry but people who say the KJB is the only good Bible annoy me alot. It is just one version among many, and in my opinion I don't like it very much.
Jesus said ''my sheep know'' my voice'' also that when the ''comforter'' (Holy Spirit) comes he would guide us into ''all truth'' that ''He would take that which is mine(Jesus) and make it known to you'' I can honestly say as a believer of nearly 30 years that the ONLY bible where i have literally felt the Holy spirits presence is when ive read the KJV. I see the day coming when the KJV will be banned (a homophbic etc) which will speak volumes! People who LOVE the truth won't be decieved.
The Bible shows that disciples started preaching (after Christ's ascention) was Antioch, Syria where the true written Word of God came from for the NT. Alexandria, Egypt is where the Libertines and other occult groups wrote the fake bibles. See Acts 6:8-15 how those occult leaders disputed with Stephen who was full of faith and the Holy Ghost. Alexandria had philosophers, astrologers and other occults. Wescott and Hort used Alexandria's text the Minor Text.
King James Version is only uncopywritten Bible in the USA; KJV is the most faithful Bible translation; come 2011 the KING JAMES BIBLE WILL BE 400 YEARS OLD. It was written so common people could know Truth.
@mrskarenkatz the problem with the King James is that it is a Version it is not a direct translation from the Hebrew and Greek scripture this is what Version mean an interpretation of a matter from a particular viewpoint;
and also something a little different from others of the same type;
@Jondadon2006 The King James Version was translated out of the 1500 Greek text the problem is the Old Greek and the Old Hebrew was made before the 1500 that is why people say that 1 John 5:7 was in the Greek Translation but what they don't know it was not in the ORIGINAL Greek Text
The only problem you are trying to disprove is that Jesus is not God so you will go far in saying the KJV has errors. There are many verses to indicate that Jesus is God
@clevelandshero23 you are a jehovahs witness, you had better dig, you are being bamboozled. they have a big plan for you guys and you are all in the dark because you let them do your homework. trust no man my friend get out of her
@vera747 I have dig and the Jehovah's Witnesses preach the truth I have many family members that are baptist and I know what they teach and the things they teach are not biblical their is not trinity, the dead is not conscious of nothing, and the King James Bible is a VERSION I know I am in the right religion you will never find unity and togetherness that the Jehovah Witnesses have with each other we are one
@clevelandshero23 I just stopped studying with them after a year and a half. A lot of cults have unity too. The unity means nothing. The only thing that matters is the Word of God, and they are teaching it to you from THEIR version of the Bible, using THEIR study aids (What Does the Bible Really Teach? and Watchtower Mag). They say the NWT is the most accurate, but will never tell you who translated it or what their credentials were.
@JackFinn Unity is important if you do not love your brothers and sisters you have noting to do with Jehovah God we must love each other unity is important my friend
@clevelandshero23 Additionally, the only reason they interpret the Bible the way they do is because "the faithful and discreet slave" tells them that's what God meant. The Bible was written for everyone. You don't need a specific group of men to tell you what it all means. It's the same with the Catholics and the pope. Jesus is our mediator. We don't need ANOTHER mediator between us and Christ.
@JackFinn King James bible is screwed up can you please explain to me why Revelations 3:14 say that Jesus is the beginning of the creation OF God? so let me ask you a question did Jesus create Jehovah?
@clevelandshero23 re; creation of God doesn't mean God being created.... The universe, planets, life, etc... THOSE things are the creation of God; the things that God created. So this is referring to when God began to create.
@clevelandshero23 See my response to you. You have to go back to the original Greek and also look at the Bible as an entire picture. You can't just look at their little study books and then look at bits and pieces of scripture out of context. Anyone can make the Bible say anything they want that way.
@clevelandshero23 I agree, Jesus is created. Otherwise, Jesus would have been known from the beginning to all. But God held back on knowledge of Jesus. So Jesus in a sense is created. It really makes sense.
Even though God said Jesus was with him from the beginning.
@clevelandshero23 The Greek there for "Beginning" is "arche." Paul used arche in Colossians 1:18 to describe Christ as the source or origin of all creation (not the first created; cf. Prov 8:22; John 1:3). It's explained in more detail at a site called forananswer. Just do a search for that site and Rev 3:14. :o)
@mrskarenkatz The King James is a joke. The King James is a corruption of the real texts. KJV purposely mistranslates verses to fit christian views. Plus the New Testament has been corrupted to fit the churches teachings. The New Testament has thousands of contradictions and alterations. Quick note 19 of the 27 book of the New Testament are forgeries.
@bluejayscottable Give me the writings on your accusations. Show me everything you have to back up those statements, you can email on my site or message me with all you have.
@AWWTLMinistry Get any Christian study bible. They will point all the alterations in the text. Any New Testament Historian knows the New Testament has been corrupted.
@bluejayscottable So you don't have anything to back up your accusations except "Get any Christian study bible"?. Well that was a waste of time, I thought you knew something, I thought we were going to learn something from you. Well Thank You anyways.
@AWWTLMinistry You do not want to look for yourself; I will point out a few things to you. First is bad translation. The hebrew word mashiach (מָשִׁ֫יחַ) means anointed one. The KJV translates mashiach (מָשִׁ֫יחַ) correctly in every spot except for two, Daniel 9:25 & 26. Mark 16:9-20 was not original to Mark. The end does not start showing up in the greek manuscripts until the fifth century CE. Mark also has over 20 different endings in the greek manuscripts.
i like the King James Version cause its the oldest available to me and it doesnt say that crap about In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth but in KJV it is In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth, but im not the kind of person that will say YOUR STUPID FOR BELIEVING DIFFERENT OR READING THIS!!! no im not that kind of person, cause i will only say what i believe in and what i read and thats it. I believe in God, Christian, Southern Baptist, KJV, i listen to others.
@awesomegunz the correct tanslation is, In the beginning of God's creating the heavens and the earth. Here is the hebrew.בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶץ׃ . If you do not believe me learn hebrew.
We have one Lord, one Faith, one Baptism, why do we need more than one Word? God is not the author of confusion. Why is it that when you look into where these modern translations come from they almost always stem from theosophists? Why is it that the very modern bibles themselves contain the very gnostic heresies the apostle Paul warns us about? Give me the good old days when someone would say the Word of God says.... and if you knew the scriptures everyone quoted that scripture the same.
Sir Francis Bacon edited the KJV Bible. He was a Rosicrucian satanist. The first edition of the KJV Bible was prepared under Masonic supervision and beared a large amount of Masonic markings on its cover. King James was a Freemason, initiated on April 15, 1601 at the Lodge Scoon and Perth No. 3, Perth, Scotland. The KJV Bible is even more corrupt than most modern versions of the Bible.
Sir Francis Bacon edited the KJV Bible. He was a Rosicrucian satanist. The first edition of the KJV Bible was prepared under Masonic supervision and beared a large amount of Masonic markings on its cover. King James was a Freemason, initiated on April 15, 1601 at the Lodge Scoon and Perth No. 3, Perth, Scotland. The KJV Bible is even more corrupt than most modern versions of the Bible.
THE BIBLE IS THE MARK OF THE BEAST! Constantine (1st beast) legalized Christianity & had 50 bibles compiled for his church. KING JAMES (2nd beast) 666 # of a man, born 1566, 6th of Scotland, authorized 66 book bible, an image of God's Word. You carry it in your hand, you memorize it in your head., you make it speak (the bible says) You create an image of Jesus in your mind from it. You break the new covenant of God by having faith in the bible instead of in Jesus by the gift of the Holy Ghost.
@bibleis666 boy you are WEIRD! I mean really squared up. You gotta get your ducks in a row man. You watched too many youtube videos and read to many heresis. That's how you ended up with this warped, twisted view of the Bible. You need to get saved!
@gimik2 Peculiar, Jesus said, Lest you eat my flesh and drink my blood you have no life in you. If you've seen me you've seen the Father. You must be born again. My kingdom is not of this world. Jesus was an alien and so are we. So if that's weird, so be it.
Ok, i was talking purely about "money making" side of new bibles. The spiritual side of the issue is this: paper is still paper. I deeply believe in God (because he's truth), but i refuse to believe in nonsense that some type of bible is "word of god" and others don't. In fact no book on earth is "WORD OF GOD". The idea that bible is literally word of god is actually quite new and as I see it takes to the new level - preachers declare even specific VERSION TO BE WORD OF GOD (in this case KJV).
Lmao!!! Battle of Bible translations? Correct version, wow!!! Read Professor Bart Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus" Ehrman Chairs the Department of Religious Studies at the Univ of NC Chapel Hill. It's been known for years throughout academia that we do not have the original manuscripts of the bible, only copies of copies of copies. Revelations barely made it into the cannon. Too funny...
@Jondadon2006 First of all it's plain business (and no conspiracy at all). Most of new translations are copyrighted, that means it generates A LOT OF MONEY for those who translated and made new versions. Also new versions urge christians to UPDATE their old bibles = buy new ones. Some christians have false believe that there doesn't exist industry that exploits their religion and it's followers.
It is not evil to have another translation, it is more of the fact that if you get deceived and with the Bibles you need to be careful because some of the translations are based on mans wisdom like the NIV when it mentions that Christ is saying we can eat anything and is unbiblical. So the point is not to be deceived
In some versions, it contradicts what the Bible says. In the NIV for example, we have the Bible saying man shall not live on bread alone, the rest of the verse should say "but by every word that preceiveth from the mouth of God". That was cut of of the Bible. We have other verses removed from the Bible, we have versions saying we can eat anything when the original textus receptus says different. It can cause one to be deceived in doing what is not so
@Jondadon2006 Incorrect. In point of fact, the preface of the 1611 has the translators recorded as stating bluntly that the didn't consult the original languages except where they had to. The majority of the time they simply went with the Geneva or Bishop's Bible wording. Also, the original 1611 contained footnotes that pointed out where the translators weren't sure which was the right wording and in the preface it says to not include such is folly.
Based on the other version excluding the KJV was placed with mans wisdom. Some verses were removed and some were added in. NIV for example. You will see verses removed and some verses which are bracketed in stating something which Jesus did not say like when it says that Jesus said we can eat all manner of food when Christ talks of what enters into the belly and comes out. The KJV comes directly from the textus receptus
@Jondadon2006 Which Textus Receptus? It doesn't follow any one of them, and they all disagree with each other. Some words in the KJV actually even come from the Latin Vulgate. And by the way, the Textus Receptus didn't exist before the 1500s when Erasmus made it, which is WHY some of it's readings are Latin. (He was a Catholic Priest after all.) Either way, the TR was collated by very similar means to all newer Greek texts: textual criticism.
Acts.17[29] Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device. SO, why is there a satanic symbol on a NKJV bible?
At 5:27 this guys is without a doubt MISQUOTING what is written pertaining to adding or deleting from 'this book'. That was referring to the book of Revelation, NOT the bible. The bible was NOT assembled when John was writing. I love the KJV, but he is definitely in the wrong.
The revelation you are speaking is very strong and helpful for the disciples!!!!!! Thank you my brother. By the way Im close to buying the year 1611 KJV Bible.
Trinity is unscriptual there is ony One Gospel of Christ. If you are baptized into the trinity then you are part of the Catholic Church no matter what denomination you claim or don't claim. But if you have been baptized in Jesus name then you are born again. Follow what the Disciples teach nothing else is correct. Obey Acts 2:38!!!!!!
@Imaginefree69 IS NOT WORKING FOR ME AT ALL! I am almost to the point where I believe I am cursed and cannot be saved. The Bible says only the ELITE sin not because they are born of God. I guess I am not one of God's elected my soul is doomed to Hell. But if you are right which I wish you are then I'm good, when I die NOTHING HAPPENS. COOL for a minute I thought this whole NWO & Anti Christ/Scriptures movements & Satanic rituals Secret Societies were real...
@Ilovjas The Bible is a Bronze Age book of myth. I mean, look at the ending of the story- After the unicorns and talking animals and men walking on the water and 600 year old goat herders building a Titanic out of desert shrubs, the Prince rides up on his White Horse, rescues the princess, marries her, and takes her away to live happily ever after in his mansion in the sky. Only those inside the delusion can take this seriously. To everyone else it is obviously a fairy tale. Be free.
@Ilovjas "IS NOT WORKING FOR ME AT ALL! " Exactly. Now look around at the people who claim to be born again. The people who insist that this fairy tale is real, that you must embrace it, and that the (watch this closely now) "God of Love" will torture you for ever if you don't believe it. side from the obvious stupidity of a sadistic tyrant being a "God of Love", are THOSE people living sinless lives of love and peace and service? They certainly are not. Be well. Be at peace. Be free.
@Imaginefree69 Don't take my weakness for kindness. I believe for many reasons but one is undesputible Rev; 13:16-18. NWO is here,the driving force & technology is here for the mark. The 666 is the UPC code. You cannot buy or sale anything lest you have this UPC code. A transponder is already in animals and even some people. I am free are you? Don't take God's kindness for weakness. Repent & may God's peace&mercy be with you & your family, Amen!
@Ilovjas - the UPC is most likely NOT the mark of the beast. Most probably an RFID chip. Read the scripture in Revelation. The mark is IN, notUNDER the skin of the right hand or forehead. A UPC CANNOT be under the skin, whereas a chip can.
@evilunixuser1 YOU OUT TO FOLLOW YOUR OWN ADVICE! Since you forgot to mention that the mark will also be IN your forehead and you contradict yourself since the RFID goes UNDER your skin. UPC can be IN your skin and invicible to the naked eye and be use in combination with your biometrics.
@Imaginefree69 why are you? oh gee thanks for your input i will now throw away my bible and look for something else, hey thank you soooooooo much! geh!
@Imaginefree69 God made man of the dirt, and did you know that when we eat plants, or animals that ate plants, those plants took in sunlight, carbon dioxide, and minerals from the dirt. The snake was possessed of the devil and the donkey was a special case. All the other stuff you are talking about is full of fallacy and deep misunderstanding of the Bible. As far as bats go, you clearly don't understand that old classifications systems differ from ours. You can draw all kinds of Ven diagrams.
@pastageek2 HUMANS MADE FROM DUST: The bible says humans are made from dust. Genesis 2:7, 3:19 Or that man was made from dust and woman from his rib. Genesis 2:21 - 24 Depending on which version of Creation you read. Science tells us that the ocean is the womb of life on earth. As neither of us was there to observe the process, let's look and see what humans are really made of: Hmmm... Nearly all salt water and a few minerals. Sea water.
@Imaginefree69 Science isn't a voice that tells always says certain things. It is a process of discovery whereby theories that are falsifiable are created and often abandoned for better ones. Not sure what proof you think says we came from the ocean. And where did water happen to get the salt? It had to erode it from land. We could therefore be easily made from land stuffs by an almighty Creator.
@pastageek2 "The snake was possessed of the devil " That is NOT what the Bible says. Got a chapter and verse for that? "the donkey was a special case." Could you provide some EVIDENCE for talking beasts? What with the flat earth and all I'm not prepared to accept the unsupported testimony of scripture. My grandpa once had a pet turtle that played Edelweiss on the trombone, but never with witnesses present. It really frustrated Pops that no one believed him.
@Imaginefree69 ok perhaps not a possessed snake, perhaps a transformation, and in Rev. 12:9 the connection is there. If the donkey was a miracle, then there really wouldn't be any special archeological evidence for it. Other than a devil in the form of a snake and a donkey I don't recall any talk in the Bible about others. Considering that in Isaiah 42:5 it talks about the heavens (old way of saying cosmos) being stretched and E. Hubble observed that, "unsupported" is an incorrect term.
@pastageek2 Like I said earlier, Identify the error and show your evidence. You have not done so, so why should I respond? You speak of "a devil in the form of a snake and a donkey." Why do you feel the need to change the words of your Bible? It says that a serpent talked to Eve and a donkey talked to Balaam. Nothing about a devil in either story. If I am mistaken, please bring your evidence and correct me. Don't bother replying without evidence, as I will not bother responding to mere opinion.
@Imaginefree69 Also you can look up the work of Moshe Carmeli using Relativity which has been used to produce a cosmology that is consistent with Bible and observed fact. So comparing your gPa and the Bible is a rather silly equivocation, and there weren't witnesses to most of those just so stories that the macroevolution/bigbang/yoyobigbang/membrane theorists think up. Let's face it, origins and historical science is religious no matter what side.
@Imaginefree69 Ok which assertions and what scripture if you please. As far as birds and bats, you mentioned something about the Bible calling them the same. That of course is not in Genesis but in Lev. Since the Old Testement is in Hebrew well... tektonics(dot)org/af/batbird(dot)html is telling you what I told you and says what I was telling you about Biblical astronomy and your misunderstanding. I'm not avoiding any issues here.
So which of the MANY translations of the KJV is the best? I mean..there have been dozens and dozens of corrections over the nearly 400 some odd years of its existence...the elizabethan language of 15th century england is DEAD!!! Nobody speaks that way anymore...Jesus didn't speak that way..Paul didn't speak that way...the only TRUE translation is in the original greek and hebrew texts..so If I had a greek/hebrew bible..I would tell you that your KJV is sending you to hell...Grow up!
@Camel76 What is your opinion about the Geneva Bible. It was made before the KJV and was translated from the same text of the KJV. But the differences are small and are usually vocabuallry changes. But do you think that the Geneva is also the Word of God.
KJV Bitch! lol
surpss 1 week ago
KJV Onlyism is perfectly defined in the YouTube video King James Follies 5. It is like taking a trip to Disney World and fawning over the sign and claiming it is the one true sign to Disney World and all other signs are plots set up by Sea World to deceive you. If you base your faith on a translation rather than the Almighty Creator through the Messiah, you have established an idol as your focus of worship regardless of how you explain otherwise. Think about it.
davegooley 2 weeks ago
While KJV is a fine translation and does illustrate that through repentance and living according to the standard of righteousness established by יהוה, known as the Torah, is what establishes redemption and enduring to the end establishes salvation, just as many other translations also do, the KJV is not unpolluted as I explained in my previous post. Continuing...
davegooley 2 weeks ago
To make the claim unpolluted means you are saying something is without error, flaw, or personal interpretation. The KJV is certainly not unpolluted since all 3 apply (the 3rd being there was a known drunkard on the translation team that was not cast out and Erasmus was a devoted Roman Catholic). Furthermore, MasoreticVsKJV addresses a number of errors made by the KJV or shows how they used sources OTHER than Textus Receptus such as the Septuagint. Continuing...
davegooley 2 weeks ago
to all you kjv fanatics........ your about retarded.... your argument of, this is the version that god gave us....yeah.... you MIGHT wanna do a tad bit more studying. your the exact people that picket and do these outlandish riots towards people you know nothing of, judge people when it goes against your belief, and turn people off towards the word of god.
way2manybeer 3 weeks ago
The changes in these new bible perversions is designed to attack basic Biblical doctrines. You cannot witness to a Jehovah's witness' with them because they contain the same errors.
cjpwi 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
America began in the city named after King James- meaning Jamestown, Virginia. And this is a sign. See the Aimed At America 3 video because these Scripture parallels will only manifest in the King James Bible!
vincent15641 2 months ago
I only use The JHV Bible
MoldytoasterMedia 3 months ago
@MoldytoasterMedia
what's the jhv bible
FearNoWeapon777 3 months ago
@FearNoWeapon777 It's the most accurate translation of the bible.
MoldytoasterMedia 3 months ago
@MoldytoasterMedia
Ok... and what does JHV stand for? The jerusalem of heaven version? the Jesuit Hort Version?
FearNoWeapon777 3 months ago
@FearNoWeapon777 The Jonathan Harchick Version. It's just a more modern/accurate translations.
MoldytoasterMedia 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's the same argument I have had with the JWs. What is God not powerful enough to do? If Satan can change God's word then Satan wins. But was we know from the Book of Revelations we win because the Lamb will send Satan and his demon and false teacher into the Lake of Fire
suggesttwo 4 months ago
Comment removed
suggesttwo 4 months ago
Comment removed
suggesttwo 4 months ago
2Ti 3:16 All Scripture is God-breathed and profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,
2Ti 3:17 so that the man of God may be perfected, being fully furnished for every good work.
does the NWT exclude John Ch1 (v.1-51) which is John's testimony of the divinity of Christ?
BTW the NWT is much more accurate than KJV because we have found more manuscripts since 1600.
suggesttwo 4 months ago
@suggesttwo Uh...wrong. Finding more manuscripts means nothing. We have found MANY more manuscripts since 1604, and the ones that agree with the Textus Receptus numbers far more than those that agree with the Minority Text. Your Bible uses the Minority Text, and the manuscripts used for your heretical NWT do not agree with each other completely. The Textus Receptus, however, disagrees ONLY in the spelling of certain names/places. Do some research into your NWT. You'll change to the KJV.
Xallia621 3 months ago
@Xallia621 You are right, finding more manuscripts means nothing because All scripture is God breathed. I appoligize for repeating your mistake.
suggesttwo 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@suggesttwo Lol do some research, man. You have no clue what you're talking about.
Xallia621 3 months ago
@Xallia621 the reference is 2Tim 3:16
suggesttwo 3 months ago
@suggesttwo
I'm almost complete with reading the NWT. What a terrible Bible. More difficult to understand than the KJV. Despite all efforts to remove the Deity of Christ, I'm MORE convinced that Jesus is God from reading the NWT. The NWT hides accurate renderings of verses in the footnotes.
Look at the footnotes and cross-references in the Reference Bible of the NWT... it proves Jesus is God.
FearNoWeapon777 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
America began in the city named after King James. And that is a sign. See the Aimed At America 1 video for some 2020 revelations
vincent15641 4 months ago
America began in the city named after King James. And that is a sign. See the Aimed At America 1 video for some 2020 revelations.
vincent15641 4 months ago
The KJV is inspired by Luthers translation. Its good in many ways but have its flaws. If you believe one is 100% accurate in comparison with any old original manuscript i hope you find that verision :) If you don't find that 100% Bible or think so and let that put doubt in you in any way regarding Yashuah as your saviour or Yhwh as our heavenly father then you rationalise to much..
Isaiah 55:8 " the Lord’s ways are not our ways, and His thoughts are not our thoughts!
matereo 4 months ago
no....the people that attack the k.j.v. ...sadly are for the most part saved....they will be judged......
jonniec7 5 months ago
Regarding the jots mentioned (actually these corresponded the letter Y) :The KJV removes all the Hebrew letter jots in its use of English words. Furthermore, since the Hebrew and Greek words originally used had semantic ranges and nuances that did not directly correspond to English equivalents, such a translation must have shaved off not just literal jots but real elements of meaning with them. Just think how difficult ti would be to make sure that similar sounding/looking words carried over.
Brightfame73 6 months ago
Finally, the word church comes from the Greek word circe, which is the foundation of the word circus. Church also refers to a pagan temple where heathen worship their false mighty ones. So unless your pastor is a ring leader and the administration are the stage hands, or you are part of a pagan temple of heathen worship, the Bride of the Messiah is an assembly of believers, and true believers observe all of the commands of יהוה that apply to them found in the Torah.
davegooley 7 months ago
To continue, the KJV is not unpolluted, and neither are the militant individuals who call all other translations as lies and errant as well as calling anyone who reads them as deceived. The Geneva Bible, the Bishops Bible and the Tyndale translation all came before KJV in English, and the KJV translators used information from at least two of these sources when performing the translation. Another error in KJV is the improper translating of ekklesia to church when it means assembly.
davegooley 7 months ago
Listen, KJV is a beautiful poetic translation, but it is not without errors. The eternal Creator's name of יהוה was never meant to be replaced with LORD. Zechariah 12:10 is one of many verses that is also improperly translated when the JPS has a more accurate translation of the middle part, "and they shall look unto Me because they have thrust him through". Another error in KJV is Psalms 12:7, which should have preserve us from this generation forever in the end part of the verse.
davegooley 7 months ago
Comment removed
jonkink123 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well, i was just asking if you could donate me any money to my pay pal. I'm trying to do a fundraiser for the homeless, which is going to be me.
If you could give me even 2 $ anything will help.
I wouldn't be begging you if i wasn't desperate.
lunalaroux@gmail.com is my pay pal e-mail
If you go to the 'personal' tab on pay pal, then go to wire money.
And if you cant afford to help me... please pray from me.
I will even accept spiritual guidance... Thank you.
LunaLaroux 9 months ago
@LunaLaroux nigerian money scam much?
sonicscreamingblue 8 months ago
The original King James Version bible is under attack because it is the only true bible that God gave to us people of our days and there is no problems with it. People who serve the devil is against this bible and they have created all these different versions that are orchestrated by satan to cause confusion and destruction of the truth. Those who change the king James version is going to hell
crazydaysful 10 months ago 8
@crazydaysful: The KJV is under attack because some Christians are able to use the brains God gave them and they can research and see for themselves the history of this erroneous version. And it is quite unchristian like to call people devil servers because they don't agree with your particular brand of Bible. That is extremely judgemental and dangerous and it is exactly why religious people get a bad reputation for being looneys. We don't all have small and closed minds.
zoeyjusko 9 months ago
@zoeyjusko - the original King James Version is under attack by liars and fake servers of Christ like you. Jesus said to be aware of those wolves in sheeps clothing and you are one. You are of the devil and you are talking to the wrong the person when you talk to me because I am very wise in the truths of God. Christians who get a bad rep for being looneys are fake Christians. You are of the devil and God is going to deal with you soon!
crazydaysful 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@crazydaysful
"People who serve the devil is against this bible and they have created all these different versions that are orchestrated by satan to cause confusion and destruction of the truth. "
=======
AMEN. Satan is the father of lies and the author of confusion. It makes PERFECT sense that Satan would attack the Bible so as to paralyze those who are seeking to draw closer to God with uncertainty as to which translation to trust.
FearNoWeapon777 3 months ago
@FearNoWeapon777 one of my favourite ways to clearify an issue was reading the whole passage was to read other translations. Then I found a program with the hebrew/greek word attached to KJV text. before that I would rely on study notes in my study bible. When I got my first full bible I did not understand it, NKJV or NIV. I would read a verse and see wht it meant in the notes. I was clueless and if I would have bee given a KGV with no notes I don't think I would be a Christain today.
suggesttwo 3 months ago
@crazydaysful zoeyjuskoIf they read and don't understand waht good is that? I just learned 2 days ago that a cherubum is an angel not a peice of furnature in the tabernacle on the OT. If they used the word angel I would have understood. This is exactly how people get religous not saved. When I was a child do you know how may time I said "Amen" not knowing it meant "I believe!"? How many times I promised to repent not knowing I had to change in my ex (Catholic) church?
suggesttwo 3 months ago
@crazydaysful I hope that there's a heaven, And if there is, we'll all be there, That probably there's not, doesn't make me despair, If there was a good God, there would be no hell, If there was a loving God all would turn out well, But probably God's are imaginary! A failed hypothesis! How am I going to experience anything, When I've turned back into dust? see Job 14v10-14, Eccles 3v19 Man's fate is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both. All have the same spirit / breath.
zytigon 2 months ago
The king james is one of the the worst versions you could possibly use. It was translated using lower quality inferior manuscripts. Other versions like NSRV go back to the oldest known manuscripts. Although to be honest, in my opinion it really makes little difference in my opinion, unless you are a literalistic fundamentalist. This topic is far larger than this and not at all simple.
PipeManChuck 10 months ago
the version war is completelty useless topic while
ppl angst over thisinstead of spreading the gospel itself.
TheMessanjah 11 months ago
@TheMessanjah Our purpose on Earth is not to spread the gospel. Our purpose is to glorify God. That's why man was created in the first place. While spreading the gospel is important it's just one of the ways God is glorified. Having correct doctrine is equally important.
ItssBrian 10 months ago
@TheMessanjah
No it is not. We cannot see God. The best way to have a relationship with God is to understand what it is that God wishes for us...how can one spread the gospel if one doesn't know or if one is not certain as to what it is? God's Word is the beginning of Christian growth- but satan attacks this foundation by making people DOUBT God's Word- leading people to doubt God's existence. Afterall, if God cannot protect his word then is he really all-powerful?
FearNoWeapon777 3 months ago
@FearNoWeapon777 you seriusly believe that only the british englsih written kjv is the real word of god ? *laughs*
TheMessanjah 3 months ago
@TheMessanjah true, but if you have a alse version of the Bible, then what message are yu gonna spread? a falsified message?
i think it is important for us Christians to preach the correct word to lead people to the truth, not corrupted teachings...is that too extreme? hhhhh !!bless
madenew000 1 month ago
@TheMessanjah the new versions change the gospel
moedizzl3 1 week ago
man changed the bible its documented in so many diffrent areas!!!!!! There was no 1 coming up from under the earth changing words in a book with few refrences to the thing or idea called a "devil." Stop with the drugs son!
PeaceAndJustice357 11 months ago
The KJV added words to the bible. In the early and many later editions there are words in italics. Those are ones that the translators added to make sense out of the text.
Naiant 1 year ago
@Naiant You don't know the history of the Bible. There are over 64,000 manuscripts backing the KJV, while there are only 3 manuscripts for all modern translations. These 64,000 manuscripts prove and back up the authenticity of the KJV. Do you even know the process that was used to translate the manuscripts into English? If not its a great place to start understanding the truly inspired word of God; The Kings James Version
LordJesus4Ever 11 months ago
@Naiant That's so that it can remain a literal translation, but still be proper English.
ItssBrian 10 months ago
KJV-1611 is best for what an English speaking human can get their hands on and read. But I would recommend getting knowledge of a christian martyr named William Tyndale, he did finish the whole old testament(Genesis-2Chronicles) and the entire new testament which where used to write the KJV-1611. Just check out the Thomas Matthew Bible- 1539 it's hard to read but I always said, "I would rather hear the words of a martyr than the words of a ManKing." JKV-1611 is great- but Tyndale is greater.
chriscoolguy15 1 year ago
Comment removed
chriscoolguy15 1 year ago
That symbol on the kjv bible is the same one that deicide has on their cd once upon a cross...it is evil...why else would they have that symbol...its on other satanic rings and necklaces to...i saw them on the internet...and instead of saying god in that version they say him...him is not my god him can be anyone
sararudd92 1 year ago
I'm a Christian but its suspicious all this KJV stuff because 777 are the the divine numbers from the"Book of Law"by Aliester Crowley.You can see that the movie"Book of Eli"its just an anagram of "Book of Lie"refering to the KJV in the movie, so Book of Eli/Lie/Law its refering to Aliester Crowley's book & if you see the roots of Gail Riplinger(KJV defender),i mean she studied on the illuminati oxford university,so i think KJV is like Thelema Crowley's teachings disguised with a Christian cover
WatchThisVideos 1 year ago
I'm sorry but people who say the KJB is the only good Bible annoy me alot. It is just one version among many, and in my opinion I don't like it very much.
coolbanana165 1 year ago
Jesus said ''my sheep know'' my voice'' also that when the ''comforter'' (Holy Spirit) comes he would guide us into ''all truth'' that ''He would take that which is mine(Jesus) and make it known to you'' I can honestly say as a believer of nearly 30 years that the ONLY bible where i have literally felt the Holy spirits presence is when ive read the KJV. I see the day coming when the KJV will be banned (a homophbic etc) which will speak volumes! People who LOVE the truth won't be decieved.
kate151269 1 year ago
1 Muslim one Quran 1 god that simple
halo0001master 1 year ago
The Bible shows that disciples started preaching (after Christ's ascention) was Antioch, Syria where the true written Word of God came from for the NT. Alexandria, Egypt is where the Libertines and other occult groups wrote the fake bibles. See Acts 6:8-15 how those occult leaders disputed with Stephen who was full of faith and the Holy Ghost. Alexandria had philosophers, astrologers and other occults. Wescott and Hort used Alexandria's text the Minor Text.
jenhba 1 year ago
King James Version is only uncopywritten Bible in the USA; KJV is the most faithful Bible translation; come 2011 the KING JAMES BIBLE WILL BE 400 YEARS OLD. It was written so common people could know Truth.
mrskarenkatz 1 year ago 12
@mrskarenkatz the problem with the King James is that it is a Version it is not a direct translation from the Hebrew and Greek scripture this is what Version mean an interpretation of a matter from a particular viewpoint;
and also something a little different from others of the same type;
clevelandshero23 1 year ago
@clevelandshero23
textus receptus
Jondadon2006 1 year ago
@Jondadon2006 The King James Version was translated out of the 1500 Greek text the problem is the Old Greek and the Old Hebrew was made before the 1500 that is why people say that 1 John 5:7 was in the Greek Translation but what they don't know it was not in the ORIGINAL Greek Text
clevelandshero23 1 year ago
@clevelandshero23
The only problem you are trying to disprove is that Jesus is not God so you will go far in saying the KJV has errors. There are many verses to indicate that Jesus is God
Jondadon2006 1 year ago
@Jondadon2006 actually their is no verse in the bible that indicates that Jesus is the Almighty God Jehovah NONE!
clevelandshero23 1 year ago
@clevelandshero23
John 10:30, Hebrew 1:8, 9, Luke 5:21, Col 1:16, Act 7:59, John 17:5, Isa 9:6 (The mighty God), Joh 14:9,
1 John 5:7
Jondadon2006 1 year ago
@clevelandshero23 you are a jehovahs witness, you had better dig, you are being bamboozled. they have a big plan for you guys and you are all in the dark because you let them do your homework. trust no man my friend get out of her
vera747 1 year ago
@vera747 I have dig and the Jehovah's Witnesses preach the truth I have many family members that are baptist and I know what they teach and the things they teach are not biblical their is not trinity, the dead is not conscious of nothing, and the King James Bible is a VERSION I know I am in the right religion you will never find unity and togetherness that the Jehovah Witnesses have with each other we are one
clevelandshero23 1 year ago
@clevelandshero23 I just stopped studying with them after a year and a half. A lot of cults have unity too. The unity means nothing. The only thing that matters is the Word of God, and they are teaching it to you from THEIR version of the Bible, using THEIR study aids (What Does the Bible Really Teach? and Watchtower Mag). They say the NWT is the most accurate, but will never tell you who translated it or what their credentials were.
JackFinn 1 year ago
@JackFinn Unity is important if you do not love your brothers and sisters you have noting to do with Jehovah God we must love each other unity is important my friend
clevelandshero23 1 year ago
@clevelandshero23 Additionally, the only reason they interpret the Bible the way they do is because "the faithful and discreet slave" tells them that's what God meant. The Bible was written for everyone. You don't need a specific group of men to tell you what it all means. It's the same with the Catholics and the pope. Jesus is our mediator. We don't need ANOTHER mediator between us and Christ.
JackFinn 1 year ago
@JackFinn King James bible is screwed up can you please explain to me why Revelations 3:14 say that Jesus is the beginning of the creation OF God? so let me ask you a question did Jesus create Jehovah?
clevelandshero23 1 year ago
@clevelandshero23 re; creation of God doesn't mean God being created.... The universe, planets, life, etc... THOSE things are the creation of God; the things that God created. So this is referring to when God began to create.
ValerieBarlow 1 year ago
@ValerieBarlow so Jesus is created right?
clevelandshero23 1 year ago
@clevelandshero23 See my response to you. You have to go back to the original Greek and also look at the Bible as an entire picture. You can't just look at their little study books and then look at bits and pieces of scripture out of context. Anyone can make the Bible say anything they want that way.
JackFinn 1 year ago
@JackFinn I read what the bible is saying and it is pretty obvious to me that Jesus is created with Rev 3:14 and Proverbs 8:22
clevelandshero23 1 year ago
@clevelandshero23 I agree, Jesus is created. Otherwise, Jesus would have been known from the beginning to all. But God held back on knowledge of Jesus. So Jesus in a sense is created. It really makes sense.
Even though God said Jesus was with him from the beginning.
anotheronem 11 months ago
@anotheronem yes and the bible also go as far of saying that Jesus have a God he cant be Jehovah God if he has a God
clevelandshero23 11 months ago
@clevelandshero23 The Greek there for "Beginning" is "arche." Paul used arche in Colossians 1:18 to describe Christ as the source or origin of all creation (not the first created; cf. Prov 8:22; John 1:3). It's explained in more detail at a site called forananswer. Just do a search for that site and Rev 3:14. :o)
JackFinn 1 year ago
@mrskarenkatz Yeah...then why does it say him instead of god...thats just wrong...
sararudd92 1 year ago
@mrskarenkatz The King James is a joke. The King James is a corruption of the real texts. KJV purposely mistranslates verses to fit christian views. Plus the New Testament has been corrupted to fit the churches teachings. The New Testament has thousands of contradictions and alterations. Quick note 19 of the 27 book of the New Testament are forgeries.
bluejayscottable 10 months ago
@bluejayscottable Give me the writings on your accusations. Show me everything you have to back up those statements, you can email on my site or message me with all you have.
AWWTLMinistry 9 months ago
@AWWTLMinistry Get any Christian study bible. They will point all the alterations in the text. Any New Testament Historian knows the New Testament has been corrupted.
bluejayscottable 9 months ago
@bluejayscottable So you don't have anything to back up your accusations except "Get any Christian study bible"?. Well that was a waste of time, I thought you knew something, I thought we were going to learn something from you. Well Thank You anyways.
AWWTLMinistry 9 months ago
@AWWTLMinistry You do not want to look for yourself; I will point out a few things to you. First is bad translation. The hebrew word mashiach (מָשִׁ֫יחַ) means anointed one. The KJV translates mashiach (מָשִׁ֫יחַ) correctly in every spot except for two, Daniel 9:25 & 26. Mark 16:9-20 was not original to Mark. The end does not start showing up in the greek manuscripts until the fifth century CE. Mark also has over 20 different endings in the greek manuscripts.
bluejayscottable 9 months ago
@mrskarenkatz: That is exactly the problem many people have with it. It's 400 years old. Believe me God's Word is alot older than that.
zoeyjusko 9 months ago
@mrskarenkatz so is "The Scriptures" which replaces Lord and God and Jesus with their ture names.
JasionJones 9 months ago
@mrskarenkatz in 1611
MrApologician 4 months ago
MAY 21, 2011 RAPTURE we can know dot com
mrskarenkatz 1 year ago
what was the greek translation that he mentions ???? wes scott somthin...........
Demolisher31 1 year ago
i like the King James Version cause its the oldest available to me and it doesnt say that crap about In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth but in KJV it is In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth, but im not the kind of person that will say YOUR STUPID FOR BELIEVING DIFFERENT OR READING THIS!!! no im not that kind of person, cause i will only say what i believe in and what i read and thats it. I believe in God, Christian, Southern Baptist, KJV, i listen to others.
awesomegunz 1 year ago
@awesomegunz the correct tanslation is, In the beginning of God's creating the heavens and the earth. Here is the hebrew.בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶץ׃ . If you do not believe me learn hebrew.
bluejayscottable 9 months ago
I much prefer the Geneva Bible. The 1611 Authorized (non-copyrighted) KJV is actually gov't document (UK and US), in law.
gregaj7 1 year ago
We have one Lord, one Faith, one Baptism, why do we need more than one Word? God is not the author of confusion. Why is it that when you look into where these modern translations come from they almost always stem from theosophists? Why is it that the very modern bibles themselves contain the very gnostic heresies the apostle Paul warns us about? Give me the good old days when someone would say the Word of God says.... and if you knew the scriptures everyone quoted that scripture the same.
yeshualovesu2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sir Francis Bacon edited the KJV Bible. He was a Rosicrucian satanist. The first edition of the KJV Bible was prepared under Masonic supervision and beared a large amount of Masonic markings on its cover. King James was a Freemason, initiated on April 15, 1601 at the Lodge Scoon and Perth No. 3, Perth, Scotland. The KJV Bible is even more corrupt than most modern versions of the Bible.
moborikenyo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sir Francis Bacon edited the KJV Bible. He was a Rosicrucian satanist. The first edition of the KJV Bible was prepared under Masonic supervision and beared a large amount of Masonic markings on its cover. King James was a Freemason, initiated on April 15, 1601 at the Lodge Scoon and Perth No. 3, Perth, Scotland. The KJV Bible is even more corrupt than most modern versions of the Bible.
moborikenyo 1 year ago
THE BIBLE IS THE MARK OF THE BEAST! Constantine (1st beast) legalized Christianity & had 50 bibles compiled for his church. KING JAMES (2nd beast) 666 # of a man, born 1566, 6th of Scotland, authorized 66 book bible, an image of God's Word. You carry it in your hand, you memorize it in your head., you make it speak (the bible says) You create an image of Jesus in your mind from it. You break the new covenant of God by having faith in the bible instead of in Jesus by the gift of the Holy Ghost.
bibleis666 1 year ago
@bibleis666 boy you are WEIRD! I mean really squared up. You gotta get your ducks in a row man. You watched too many youtube videos and read to many heresis. That's how you ended up with this warped, twisted view of the Bible. You need to get saved!
gimik2 1 year ago
@gimik2 Peculiar, Jesus said, Lest you eat my flesh and drink my blood you have no life in you. If you've seen me you've seen the Father. You must be born again. My kingdom is not of this world. Jesus was an alien and so are we. So if that's weird, so be it.
bibleis666 1 year ago
satan wrote the niv and if anyone is deceived and thinks niv is word of God they are not saved according to John 8 and John 10.
kentx333 1 year ago
Ok, i was talking purely about "money making" side of new bibles. The spiritual side of the issue is this: paper is still paper. I deeply believe in God (because he's truth), but i refuse to believe in nonsense that some type of bible is "word of god" and others don't. In fact no book on earth is "WORD OF GOD". The idea that bible is literally word of god is actually quite new and as I see it takes to the new level - preachers declare even specific VERSION TO BE WORD OF GOD (in this case KJV).
Ausiz 1 year ago
Lmao!!! Battle of Bible translations? Correct version, wow!!! Read Professor Bart Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus" Ehrman Chairs the Department of Religious Studies at the Univ of NC Chapel Hill. It's been known for years throughout academia that we do not have the original manuscripts of the bible, only copies of copies of copies. Revelations barely made it into the cannon. Too funny...
bbullish2 1 year ago
Question for one and all. Why was there a need of the other versions of the Bible?
Jondadon2006 1 year ago
@Jondadon2006 First of all it's plain business (and no conspiracy at all). Most of new translations are copyrighted, that means it generates A LOT OF MONEY for those who translated and made new versions. Also new versions urge christians to UPDATE their old bibles = buy new ones. Some christians have false believe that there doesn't exist industry that exploits their religion and it's followers.
Ausiz 1 year ago
@Ausiz
It is not evil to have another translation, it is more of the fact that if you get deceived and with the Bibles you need to be careful because some of the translations are based on mans wisdom like the NIV when it mentions that Christ is saying we can eat anything and is unbiblical. So the point is not to be deceived
Jondadon2006 1 year ago
@Jondadon2006 Why doesn't that question apply to the English bibles which predate the KJV?
the13thof12 1 year ago
@the13thof12
Reason being, the KJV was directed from the textus receptus
Jondadon2006 1 year ago
@Jondadon2006 Explain to me why that matters.
the13thof12 1 year ago
@the13thof12
In some versions, it contradicts what the Bible says. In the NIV for example, we have the Bible saying man shall not live on bread alone, the rest of the verse should say "but by every word that preceiveth from the mouth of God". That was cut of of the Bible. We have other verses removed from the Bible, we have versions saying we can eat anything when the original textus receptus says different. It can cause one to be deceived in doing what is not so
Jondadon2006 1 year ago
@Jondadon2006 That really has nothing to do with what I asked you.
the13thof12 1 year ago
@the13thof12
Textus receptus means it came from the original translation of the greek and Hebrew. Which Bibles predate the KJV?
Jondadon2006 1 year ago
@Jondadon2006 The Tyndale Bible, The Bishop's Bible, The Geneva Bible, and etc....
the13thof12 1 year ago
@the13thof12
What language were those Bibles?
Jondadon2006 1 year ago
@Jondadon2006 They are English bibles that predate the KJV.
the13thof12 1 year ago
@Jondadon2006 English
vedinthorn 1 year ago
@Jondadon2006 Incorrect. In point of fact, the preface of the 1611 has the translators recorded as stating bluntly that the didn't consult the original languages except where they had to. The majority of the time they simply went with the Geneva or Bishop's Bible wording. Also, the original 1611 contained footnotes that pointed out where the translators weren't sure which was the right wording and in the preface it says to not include such is folly.
vedinthorn 1 year ago
@vedinthorn
Based on the other version excluding the KJV was placed with mans wisdom. Some verses were removed and some were added in. NIV for example. You will see verses removed and some verses which are bracketed in stating something which Jesus did not say like when it says that Jesus said we can eat all manner of food when Christ talks of what enters into the belly and comes out. The KJV comes directly from the textus receptus
Jondadon2006 1 year ago
@Jondadon2006 Which Textus Receptus? It doesn't follow any one of them, and they all disagree with each other. Some words in the KJV actually even come from the Latin Vulgate. And by the way, the Textus Receptus didn't exist before the 1500s when Erasmus made it, which is WHY some of it's readings are Latin. (He was a Catholic Priest after all.) Either way, the TR was collated by very similar means to all newer Greek texts: textual criticism.
vedinthorn 1 year ago
Comment removed
Esaias07 1 year ago
Comment removed
Esaias07 1 year ago
Actually the NKJV is the perfected version of the King James with tweaks concerning the dead sea scrolls and minor greek translation errors.
QuantumUni 1 year ago
Holy Bible, There is only one.
It is commonly known as the Authorized Bible
Or
The King James Bible.
*******
Not only is the AV the most accurate, but it is the very truth.
Even typos are now solved and purified seven times as it were into the letter perfect truth; we call it the Holy Bible.
Now it is known as the Pure Cambridge Edition CIRCA 1900 to today.
herbbearingseed 1 year ago
reply is failing!
pastageek2 1 year ago
Imaginefree69@
The only one in denial is anyone who believes like you.
Also, accusing people of things they have not done is childish and meaningless.
You have not presented any evidence against God or Jesus.
Because you have none, to claim you do is a lie, not only to everyone who hears you , but to yourself.
People like you just want to cause trouble.
The truth falls on deaf ears.
Camel76 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Camel76
You claim that your god is real,
yet you offer no evidence to support your assertion.
According to your own criteria
this makes you a liar.
If you think I am incorrect about something
I invite you to respond in a rational and adult manner:
Identify the error and show your evidence.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Jondadon2006 Thank you!
Ganjahlism 1 year ago
who is the speaker?
Ganjahlism 1 year ago
@Ganjahlism
Jamal Sanky.
His page is called: TheFaithfulWitness
Jondadon2006 1 year ago
Acts.17[29] Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device. SO, why is there a satanic symbol on a NKJV bible?
jojojr2 1 year ago
Which KJV is unpolluted?
addictedkoala 1 year ago
At 5:27 this guys is without a doubt MISQUOTING what is written pertaining to adding or deleting from 'this book'. That was referring to the book of Revelation, NOT the bible. The bible was NOT assembled when John was writing. I love the KJV, but he is definitely in the wrong.
evilunixuser1 1 year ago
The revelation you are speaking is very strong and helpful for the disciples!!!!!! Thank you my brother. By the way Im close to buying the year 1611 KJV Bible.
MrDisciple25 1 year ago
"Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD." (Deuteronomy 6:4) KJV Bible
Your god is one god; there is no god but He, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. (Qur'an 2:163)
Jeremiah 10 (KJ V) "For as much as there is none like unto thee, O LORD; thou art great, and thy name is great in might."
Say: He is Allah, the One and Only! Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; He begetteth not
nor is He begotten. And there is none like unto Him. (Qur'an 112:1-4)
HOMELANDorDEATH 1 year ago
Trinity is unscriptual there is ony One Gospel of Christ. If you are baptized into the trinity then you are part of the Catholic Church no matter what denomination you claim or don't claim. But if you have been baptized in Jesus name then you are born again. Follow what the Disciples teach nothing else is correct. Obey Acts 2:38!!!!!!
Ilovjas 1 year ago
@Ilovjas Teach him act19:5 romans 6;3 1 john 5:7
tupactip 1 year ago
@Ilovjas "if you have been baptized in Jesus name then you are born again"
The Bible says that those who are born of god
can not sin.
How's that working out for you, then?
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Imaginefree69 IS NOT WORKING FOR ME AT ALL! I am almost to the point where I believe I am cursed and cannot be saved. The Bible says only the ELITE sin not because they are born of God. I guess I am not one of God's elected my soul is doomed to Hell. But if you are right which I wish you are then I'm good, when I die NOTHING HAPPENS. COOL for a minute I thought this whole NWO & Anti Christ/Scriptures movements & Satanic rituals Secret Societies were real...
Ilovjas 1 year ago
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Imaginefree69 Don't take my weakness for kindness. I believe for many reasons but one is undesputible Rev; 13:16-18. NWO is here,the driving force & technology is here for the mark. The 666 is the UPC code. You cannot buy or sale anything lest you have this UPC code. A transponder is already in animals and even some people. I am free are you? Don't take God's kindness for weakness. Repent & may God's peace&mercy be with you & your family, Amen!
Ilovjas 1 year ago
@Ilovjas And WHY, pray tell,
did you give me a rant about transponders?
That had exactly NOTHING to do with the topic of our discussion.
Religion and reason really ARE mutually exclusive.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Ilovjas - the UPC is most likely NOT the mark of the beast. Most probably an RFID chip. Read the scripture in Revelation. The mark is IN, notUNDER the skin of the right hand or forehead. A UPC CANNOT be under the skin, whereas a chip can.
evilunixuser1 1 year ago
@evilunixuser1 YOU OUT TO FOLLOW YOUR OWN ADVICE! Since you forgot to mention that the mark will also be IN your forehead and you contradict yourself since the RFID goes UNDER your skin. UPC can be IN your skin and invicible to the naked eye and be use in combination with your biometrics.
Ilovjas 1 year ago
@Ilovjas - All I know is, the mark will be under the skin. Did not realize a UPC can be subdermal.
evilunixuser1 1 year ago
The Bible says that humans are made of dirt.
And that snakes and donkeys talk.
And that insects have 4 legs.
And that bats are birds.
And that the earth is flat.
And that the sun revolves around the earth.
And that animals appeared AFTER man but BEFORE woman.
So why are you fretting about which VERSION to worship?
I'd think the first thing would be to find a book of TRUTH to follow.
The second would be to FOLLOW it.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Imaginefree69...Huh?where did you get that misleading info?
marvtgood 1 year ago
@marvtgood Misleading?
What do you mean by that?
Every assertion I made
is readily supported by scripture.
Why don't Christians read their book?
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@marvtgood "where did you get that misleading info? "
If you believe that I have posted erroneous assertions
I invite you to pick up your Bible and correct me.
I know you would...
if you could.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Imaginefree69 why are you? oh gee thanks for your input i will now throw away my bible and look for something else, hey thank you soooooooo much! geh!
thomasborboa 1 year ago
@thomasborboa " look for something else"
If your neighbours work on Saturday, kill them.
If your child throws oatmeal at you, kill him.
If your sister has premarital sex, kill her
(but don't think twice about her sex partner).
If the folks in the next town aren't Christians,
kill them all and take their baby girls home for sex slaves.
THIS is the basis of your morality?
Seriously, you SHOULD look for something else.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@thomasborboa "thank you soooooooo much! geh!"
Let me explain how adult discussion works:
I offered some assertions about what the Bible says.
If you think I'm wrong you could offer evidence or documentation to refute me.
Or you could courteously ask me for MY evidence.
When you respond with hostility, insults, and mockery
you are demonstrating publicly that you can NOT refute my assertions.
If you COULD we know you WOULD.
My assertions stand true and unchallenged.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@thomasborboa
" i will now throw away my bible and look for something else"
That would be one of the best moves you could make.
Seriously.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Imaginefree69 God made man of the dirt, and did you know that when we eat plants, or animals that ate plants, those plants took in sunlight, carbon dioxide, and minerals from the dirt. The snake was possessed of the devil and the donkey was a special case. All the other stuff you are talking about is full of fallacy and deep misunderstanding of the Bible. As far as bats go, you clearly don't understand that old classifications systems differ from ours. You can draw all kinds of Ven diagrams.
pastageek2 1 year ago
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Imaginefree69 Science isn't a voice that tells always says certain things. It is a process of discovery whereby theories that are falsifiable are created and often abandoned for better ones. Not sure what proof you think says we came from the ocean. And where did water happen to get the salt? It had to erode it from land. We could therefore be easily made from land stuffs by an almighty Creator.
pastageek2 1 year ago
@pastageek2 "made from land stuffs"
If you cannot see the difference between dust and salt water
I'm afraid I lack the specialized skills to talk with you.
BTW, the Bible tells us that
exposing breeding goats to a striped pole
will cause them to produce striped offspring,
while showing them a spotted pole produces spotted offspring.
Science indicates otherwise,
claiming that DNA is responsible for inherited characteristics.
Which theory do you embrace?
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Imaginefree69 ok perhaps not a possessed snake, perhaps a transformation, and in Rev. 12:9 the connection is there. If the donkey was a miracle, then there really wouldn't be any special archeological evidence for it. Other than a devil in the form of a snake and a donkey I don't recall any talk in the Bible about others. Considering that in Isaiah 42:5 it talks about the heavens (old way of saying cosmos) being stretched and E. Hubble observed that, "unsupported" is an incorrect term.
pastageek2 1 year ago
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Imaginefree69 Also you can look up the work of Moshe Carmeli using Relativity which has been used to produce a cosmology that is consistent with Bible and observed fact. So comparing your gPa and the Bible is a rather silly equivocation, and there weren't witnesses to most of those just so stories that the macroevolution/bigbang/yoyobigbang/membrane theorists think up. Let's face it, origins and historical science is religious no matter what side.
pastageek2 1 year ago
@pastageek2 "All the other stuff you are talking about is full of fallacy and deep misunderstanding of the Bible."
Nice attempt at avoiding the issues.
I assure you,
I can support each of my assertions with scripture.
Denial is not evidence.
Please show me, with documentation,
a Bronze-Age Hebrew classification that allies bats with birds.
Or were you just making that up?
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Imaginefree69 Ok which assertions and what scripture if you please. As far as birds and bats, you mentioned something about the Bible calling them the same. That of course is not in Genesis but in Lev. Since the Old Testement is in Hebrew well... tektonics(dot)org/af/batbird(dot)html is telling you what I told you and says what I was telling you about Biblical astronomy and your misunderstanding. I'm not avoiding any issues here.
pastageek2 1 year ago
So which of the MANY translations of the KJV is the best? I mean..there have been dozens and dozens of corrections over the nearly 400 some odd years of its existence...the elizabethan language of 15th century england is DEAD!!! Nobody speaks that way anymore...Jesus didn't speak that way..Paul didn't speak that way...the only TRUE translation is in the original greek and hebrew texts..so If I had a greek/hebrew bible..I would tell you that your KJV is sending you to hell...Grow up!
surgicalbassist 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't know what make people think the KJV is the best? All the bibles are the best they are all the word of God
megaman2160 1 year ago
megaman2160,
For you to make that comment, means you didn't watch this video. It also means you haven't researched the topic whatsoever.
So one must wonder.......why leave such a naive comment in the first place?
antimarxism 1 year ago
if god wanted a bible, why are there different versions of it?
pengeralus 1 year ago
Satan will try to corrupt the Word of God.
That's why there are other corrupt versions.
The Authorized King James Bible is the Word of God.
Camel76 1 year ago 19
@Camel76 What is your opinion about the Geneva Bible. It was made before the KJV and was translated from the same text of the KJV. But the differences are small and are usually vocabuallry changes. But do you think that the Geneva is also the Word of God.
bradensmagic 1 year ago
@bradensmagic They are similar.
I'd still stick to the Authorized KJV.
Camel76 1 year ago
@Camel76 well it is ONE of a very FEW that are translated from the recieved text anyway...
jojojr2 1 year ago
@Camel76
"The Authorized King James Bible is the Word of God."
Gee, just think-
the Word of God did not exist prior to 1611!
Amazin