4/24/10 - Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) Delivers Weekly GOP Address On Financial Regulation

[hczxp]

Why is she speaking to me as if I'm a three year old?

[AChildMolester]

Regulation now, regulation forever!

SEIG HEIL

[timothylcrowe1]

To my fellow Texans, FIRE Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison; the ranking Republican member of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. She reply s to me "Unfortunately, these security policies systematically failed with the nearly successful terrorist attack on one of our airliners on Christmas Day 2009 by an Al Qaeda-trained Nigerian terrorist. This disturbing incident highlights the evolving nature of terrorist threats against our country." She has bought this TSA fraud. Remove her.

[pnd51010]

confirmed reptillian shapeshifter .. pause video and watch frame by frame pay attention to her eyes , mouth and teeth major morphing going on .. wake up america

[guitarscores]

senator Kay ... you EARN your salary not by regurgitating BABBLE ... you gotta attend MEETINGS with other senators to EARN your salary ... you are NOT a tv host

[SpiceSE90]

So where is the video of Obama lying about the GM loan repayment? I guess he figures there's enough stupid people out there to pull another one over on them.

[btc8128]

Please, can't you people ever tell the truth?

[Slipknotyk06]

@btc8128 - Senator Kay is dead on. You're calling her a liar because you can't debate on the points. Where is she lying? Much of this is opinions, however many of these opinions are steeped in fact.

[btc8128]

@Slipknotyk06 Have no doubt there is someone pathetic here, and its not me. How could you possibly debate an obstructionist in good faith, or the filthy piece of gutter trash who hangs one her every word? Now go fuck yourself.

[Slipknotyk06]

@btc8128 - copy and paste. Yet again weak-minded and pathetic. The challenge to make one valuable point is still valid. Take it, I urge you! Look good to your liberal friends! Make a valuable point, and I will issue my rebuttal. You know that you cannot debate me in the realm of fact!

[btc8128]

@Slipknotyk06 Youre not worth the time. You want so badly to engage someone, youre sad and lonely and I refuse to give you the conversation you so desperately want or need. Personally I led a team of employees evaluating the Bill and it effect on our firm and produced a brief that was submitted our board of directors. I could educate you my friend, with that said, go fuck yourself. Bye

[Slipknotyk06]

@btc8128 - I doubt that very seriously. You're just one of these flame war people wearing a dunce cap trying to look hardcore with a keyboard. You have failed to even produce one valuable point. A person in your position would have at least done that before calling names.

[flobrew]

@Slipknotyk06 The left rarely can debate on fact and issue. They prefer to rely on emotion and "feeling." and that only goes for the ones who don't immediately resort to calling people liars or stupid without foundation. People like btc8128 make me cry for my country and the ideals that great men have died for.

[Slipknotyk06]

@flobrew - I looked at his profile, and looked at the videos he favorited. Basically, I see a bunch of the leftist commentators telling him all the wrongs of the right. However, most of them said don't engage Republicans on debates about facts, because they can't win based on facts. He just immediately calls people of higher intelligence than himself 'liars' and won't justify that claim. You have a damn good point, and I second your motion.

[flobrew]

@Slipknotyk06Thanks for that. If you look at all these progressives on Youtube, you only find one or 2 that will actually try to debate you on facts. They are the hard core socialists. I tend to at least have a bit of respect for those people even though I think they are wrong and dangerous. Thje ones that are obviously falling right into party line without trying to understand why, those are the ones I really feel for even while they infuriate and scare me. An ignorant vote is still a vote.

[Slipknotyk06]

@flobrew - Ignorant votes are why we're here today. I believe in a well-informed electorate. We have a society where indoctrination receives preference over education. Indoctrination is everywhere in the Public School system. Global Warming is taught as a fact, and nothing is said of the wrongs of big government or Union Thugs. Indoctrination is in the media, virtually no one has spoken a word about SEIU's beating of Kenneth Gladney.

[flobrew]

@Slipknotyk06 You mean like when they ignore the anti-illegal immigration legislation rally in Arizona where people were starting fights?. Or a Bobby Jindal staffer and her boyfriend being beaten in the streets in a politically motivated attack after the Southern Republican Leadership Conference here in Louisiana? No. looks like the real news is in interviewing statists that talk about the "dangerous people in the Tea Party" even though there is no evidence to support that claim at all. Amen bro

[Slipknotyk06]

@flobrew - I didn't know about those violent protests, or that attack in Louisiana. It bugs me to hear Clinton say that he believes anti-gov rhetoric is what caused the OKC bombing. No, the guy reacted to your actions in Waco, where you slaughtered dozens of innocent people! It's awesome how these people rewrite history. They call us violent, citing a single militia's website as evidence. I could consider Chris Matthew's threats of sticking a gun in Rush's mouth as the most ominous I've heard.

[flobrew]

@Slipknotyk06 Not surprised you haven't heard about. The protesters in AZ threw bottles at police officers' heads (on video no less.) But the only thing said on CNN was that, "Although the protesters were mostly peaceful...." And Clinton has the nerve to say we shouldn't judge them all based on a few violent individuals! Tea Parties never get even that much credit. Jindal's aide only made local news. It doesn't fit the media narrative of the stupid angry GOP. and peaceful freedom fighting dems.

[Jaimetud]

Dear Senator Kay,

Mitch McConnell claimed that the bill supported future bailouts. Where in the VAT bill does it advocate future bailouts?

[Slipknotyk06]

@Jaimetud - In the financial regulatory bill, there is a provision that will have the effect, intended or not intended, of making permanent bailouts of firms that are 'too big to fail.' VAT is separate. VAT is how the Democrats want to pay for much of their spending. So you're confusing one bill for another.

[Jaimetud]

@Slipknotyk06 Thank you for the response. I've been watching videos from both Republican and Democrat channels here on Youtube and it seems that some folks aren't too keen on mentioning what bill they're talking about. Is there anywhere online that I can read the financial regulatory bill?

[Slipknotyk06]

@Jaimetud - You may have to order it, as I doubt you can read it online. That would probably be at your friendly Senate website. Just google U.S. Senate, and you can probably find your way from there. You'll probably have to order it to be sent to you in a giant box, as it is a nearly 1,400 page bill. Should cost about $50.00 to order. I'm sure that you can find summaries from both parties for free, though.

[Slipknotyk06]

@Jaimetud - sorry for a second reply. I give you props for attempting to educate yourself.

[Jaimetud]

@Slipknotyk06 S'ok dude. $50 for a bill? Open congress, my ass.

[Slipknotyk06]

@Jaimetud - that's better than d/ling it at a library, and printing it out at 10 cents a page that would come up to $140

i wish you could just D/L it and print it out on your own nickel, which would ultimately cost $40-50, maybe more. It would go through a full toner cartridge, and 3 reams of paper.