I have the facelift 2001 accord type r, a bit more power and lighter than the pre-facelift I believe . It's totally standard and can't believe just how much fun and how good it is .
Its the older 92-95 VTI, so its REALLY light. I know the 2.2 will have more torque, but the power to weight of the VTI would probably be better. Plus you never know the speed, and position of VTEC zone. Both cars are awesome. Simple as that.
wats the point putting at the start that vti's are 160bhp and accord type r's are 212bhp when the vti clearly isnt standard, why dont you put what bhp the car is
ja alguem considerou o peso dos carros?? o atr é de longe mais pesado, e alem disso seja kualker for o civic em relação aos accords teem muito mais garra sao motores mais nervosos!
your wrong about the civic time because the hatch back does it in 7.5 and the saloon in that vid does it in 7.7. the only civic that can do it in 7.3 is the old ef9 civics.
B16 all the way, but of course the type r gonna win, its a type r
jdmintegratyper0 9 months ago
There s not a huge weight difference in the cars so the Accord should win comfortably - something amiss here!
kingchrissyp 1 year ago
that one person turned out to decisive
TheRadiastral 1 year ago
I have the facelift 2001 accord type r, a bit more power and lighter than the pre-facelift I believe . It's totally standard and can't believe just how much fun and how good it is .
PS I'm not a boy racer :)
bankruptstate 1 year ago
tenhu um fn2 stock.gostava de ver como era com o vti e atr...komo e que e???
rpower02 2 years ago
Its the older 92-95 VTI, so its REALLY light. I know the 2.2 will have more torque, but the power to weight of the VTI would probably be better. Plus you never know the speed, and position of VTEC zone. Both cars are awesome. Simple as that.
BUDSTERdotNET 2 years ago
If both cars were standard the ATR should have walked away. Very odd. ':-/
snazzyjazzy360 2 years ago 2
poorly ATR :o(
H22A7 2 years ago 2
EG9 VTi is the best!!!
stidoki 2 years ago
wats the point putting at the start that vti's are 160bhp and accord type r's are 212bhp when the vti clearly isnt standard, why dont you put what bhp the car is
bradistanis 2 years ago 3
My Vti was stock in this vid.. the ATR have one passenger.. anyway both cars tuned b16 wins!
BTW my car was making 162bhp at the time..
eg9CT 2 years ago
ja alguem considerou o peso dos carros?? o atr é de longe mais pesado, e alem disso seja kualker for o civic em relação aos accords teem muito mais garra sao motores mais nervosos!
carloshondacivic 3 years ago
pa se fosse o meu n ias tao longe...
audia3sabido 3 years ago
é provavel.. este atr tava uma bocado preso e levava uma pessoa a mais! Mas ja comparei sozinho com ele e mm assim fico à frente ate aos 200 ;)
eg9CT 3 years ago
has anybody consideres dat the accord driver is a shit driver
ballinlough123 3 years ago
honda power
XPTOPOWER 3 years ago
this atr is sick!!!
b16a2y 3 years ago
this is a feak.. Vti (Stock) is never faster than ATR...
adrianovtec 3 years ago 2
VTi and ATR aren´t stock..
But yes, stock to stock the VTi lose!
eg9CT 3 years ago
Accord is slightly faster to 60 and should have a better top speed.
rehmant 3 years ago
actually those two are about the same 7.2sec official for accord and 7.3sec for the civic.
and yes accord should have slightly better top speed but nothing major.
h1coupe 3 years ago
your wrong about the civic time because the hatch back does it in 7.5 and the saloon in that vid does it in 7.7. the only civic that can do it in 7.3 is the old ef9 civics.
rehmant 3 years ago
has i said before none of the cars are stock..
and my vti does 7 0-100klm (0-60mph) ;)
eg9CT 3 years ago
pretty good video.
h1coupe 3 years ago
your ATR is poorly
H22A7 3 years ago
thats weird because stock for stock accords faster
rehmant 3 years ago
non of the cars are stock :P
eg9CT 3 years ago
stock for stock they are about the same.
h1coupe 3 years ago
granda jarda!
simplevti 3 years ago