And we keep calling them violent and barberic? When have we ever focused on the antagonismthat Christianity brought? How abou the Crusades and the forced conversions in the Americas?
I just wish Viking culture took over Europe instead of Christendom, it would've been so vibrant.
The Vikings' indigenous polytheistic religion was far richer and far more culturally fertile than the arid, desert religion of Christianity, which was forced down their pagan necks.
Fascinating documentary, and I have to say, the religious debates in the comments have been quite amusing. I'm American, I'm Christian, but my great-great grandfather was from Sweden and I've always felt a connection to it and love learning everything about it, Norse mythology included. Just like any civilization's tales of old, it IS possible to enjoy the stories purely on an artistic/cultural level without following a certain religion. Now everybody just relax and enjoy the videos. :)
Vikings should wait for another 300 years...then you can rape and pillage Portugal and Spain monasteries (all that gold from the new world)! Converting to Christianity was stupid.
It was the rulers that saw Christianity as politically useful. Or rather it was bureaucratic structure of the Church and its monks that were useful as civil servants. Forget this bullshit about Christianity "bringing peace". Peace was brought to the kingdom by a large royalist army, while foreign-born priests and monks helped to revise the legal codes, and ministered to the local populace with the swords of the king's Housecarls and Gestir to back up the missionaries.
@Vexille1983 yes that's right - the vikings used christianity when they could take advantage and didn't give a toss about it when it didn't suit them! the balance of power was very much in favour of the vikings not the christians - inferior people quickly become superstitious and live in fear - christianity in a nutshell for me! ofcourse they will try to take credit for anything they can - but the vikings played/toyed with the christians and did no more than pay lip servive when it suited them!!
I don't like when documentaries have narration over the end credits. Would it be so great a loss of chiched performance to have the program be a minute shorter so as to avoid distracting words cluttering the screen? I can't wait until they stop this ridiculous practice.
Wonder why Haralds "empire" didn't include Sweden. Probably because the people in sweden were super Vikings which is a newly adopted term in scientific research
They make it so romantic when they talk about vikings and christianity. They should read about King Olaf the St. and his half brother, Harald Hard-Ruler converting Norway by the tip of the sword.
No wonder we are the least christian post-christian nation in the world.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Good shit, I enjoyed it, by the way the Vikings DIDN'T settle North America, although many believe they did travel there, which is incredible seafaring.
oh so the viking settlements in novia scotia and new england were indians... indians building forts and houses with the exact same way the vikings did.. even though the way the scandinavians constructed them was unique... of course. oh and all the sagas were wrong too, the thousand year old runes were all lying as well =)
@petkol Didn't know that fair enough, it just baffled me that there wasn't any when Columbus got there, I thought "settling" somewhere meant you made your home there and stayed there.
@MrJizmonkey -- That's true, but then you die. And small numbers of settlers tend to not leave a genetic footprint. Same thing with the Anglian-Norse settlement of England -- a male war-lord elite who took over the Romano-British systems of governance (including their Latin titles). You leave the "natives" largely intact (warlords don't plow or clerk) and you marry or consort with local women; your grandchildren will start to "go native" and their progeny will be regarded as such.
I'm pissed at how this documentary barely mentioned the fact that the vikings settled North America, that's the most interesting thing I find about the Vikings.
I would have like to have seen that too. Maybe even mention more on this 'rebellion'. I think they skipped a heap right there. Oh suddenly there was a rebellion. No there wasn't it was more than that.
I kinda think that this video is BULLSHIT. It actually sort of pisses me off. They make it seem like the vikings fought against all christians because they were christian. What the fuck. It was no "holy war" like the christians used to conquer a lot. The vikings just straight up conquered and raided, there was no certain way of deciding who they'd go after. But on the other hand, i think that the video is somewhat good. Grrr
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
well the ppl of sweden isnt the same as in the viking age because i have read that the vikings had larger brains then the modern sweds have today however i have a larger brain then most sweds though so i might still have a large viking brain :D
blutstrudel, go back and watch the part of this with the talking to the dude about the long boats. Look at the damn boat, notice the obviously metal rivet heads? Now re-watch the same part, but this time listen to the guy say what type of IRON they used to build the damn boats. Write that crap down and google it Mr Butstrudel, after reading up a bit on what you found ask yourself " does this type of iron rust?" dumbass.
Leif Ericsson did a hell of a job to make it to america without sails. Vikings were strong people but wtf? Longboats had sails because it´s impossible for the vikings to establish such a big trade/rading "empire" with just oars. I meen if ju have to use oars to get to england you would have to rest a year before storming the monastary.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You know; I was trying to give you people some lesson in history, and boat making. Obviously non of you're an expert,like me in the subject so unless one of you are an expert be quiet. Because it make you seem ignorant to the subject.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Godsovs I know that they have some Viking Long Boat replicas, but if you noticed they were retrofitted with under water counter weights, so they could add the sails, because if not the boat will flip on its sides. It's impossible to keep these boat on the water with sails because of their slim built. these boats are made only with oars. because the oars are the only thing that kept them steady on the water without flipping. this is a scientific fact.
Please don't state something is a 'fact' with nothing to back it up. Instead of arguing with folks, spend ten minutes of research time on the web. Then appologize to folks for spreading bad info.
In denmark we have reconstructed long boats, and other viking ships, WITH sails, and they seem to be sailing very well. In fact, there have just been a trip from Denmark (cant remember where) to northern england somewhere, with sails.
Having a lot of rescuing ships among them offcourse, if anything should go wrong.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
That's nonsense that the Viking Long Boat or any Viking Boat for that matter had a sail. It will be impossible because the center of gravity would've flip the Boat on its sides. This boat were constructed to be use with Oars Only,to go up rivers and not for the fairy tale of open Ocean Exploration. The Titanic couldn't cross the same very waters and got hit by an Iceberg, imagine those Wooden Planck Boat crossing the same waters specially when there were more Iceberg on the water than now.
It is the first time, that I have heard anyone dissing the design of the viking long boats.
If they were so horribly bad, I wonder why exactly the same basic design is still being used today all over Scandinavia. Go to any port and yoy will see, what I mean.
My friend; I'm not dissing the Viking Long Boat is the truth, that they were made of wooden planks and not one them used any type of iron nails nor sails because in the burial grounds were they found them their was no evidence of such and to keep the wooden planks together they use wooden pecks and pine tree resin for glue and to protect the wood from rotting. These vessels were clearly use for lakes and river crossing not for Ocean crossing. Remember iron nails would have rotten by sea.
No, they only tied in the ribs, not the hull. The hull was built first, joined with up to 700 kilos of iron nails, then the ribs fitted and secured. This is the reverse of more modern techniques. It gave a springiness to the frame so that the ship would flex when in use to releive strain on the wood.
You might also note that dhows have been sailing in the eastern seas with lashed-together hulls for many centuries.
I seeing a Viking Long Boat with my own eyes and let me tell you not one of them have iron nails and they were not tide like you said. I repeat my self for the last time. They used wooden pecks for what will have kept the wooden planks together. If they would've used iron nails the sea water or any water for that matter would've rotten the nails and the boat would've sink nor would we have any Long Boats left to study OK. Mr. Taconuri
@Blutstrupfs: what is your purpose for spreading disinformation like this. you say that the viking didn't use iron nails. but if you had spent the time to watch all 5 parts you would have seen in part 3 the more then 1000 your old viking ship that still had its nails preserved. the vikings was so smart that they could make non rusting nails. so stop claiming your an expert and admit your a lunatic running amok
LOL.....it wasn't uncommon for someone to publicly pretend to convert to one religion, but continued to follow their own. I do agree with you that a Viking doesn't seem the same without Odin or Vahalla. :D
@bobbymullinix A good year and peace to you. Svend Tveskæg was the -real- hero. Harald was so detested in his own lifetime (uniter of Denmark bedamned) that his own SON could raise a rebellion against him and dethrone him. That really should tell people all they need to know.
And we keep calling them violent and barberic? When have we ever focused on the antagonismthat Christianity brought? How abou the Crusades and the forced conversions in the Americas?
I just wish Viking culture took over Europe instead of Christendom, it would've been so vibrant.
BayAreaOrBust 1 week ago
The Vikings' indigenous polytheistic religion was far richer and far more culturally fertile than the arid, desert religion of Christianity, which was forced down their pagan necks.
talbot5445 2 weeks ago 3
They forgot to mention how the icelandic vikings colonized greenland and north america long before the rest of europe.
TheOneCalledSloth 2 weeks ago
NEVER CHRISTIAN ALWAYS GERMANIC/PAGAN PRIDE!
alemanloco1 1 month ago 2
Christianization = Loss of huge amount of culture :(
criticman123 2 months ago 6
Fascinating documentary, and I have to say, the religious debates in the comments have been quite amusing. I'm American, I'm Christian, but my great-great grandfather was from Sweden and I've always felt a connection to it and love learning everything about it, Norse mythology included. Just like any civilization's tales of old, it IS possible to enjoy the stories purely on an artistic/cultural level without following a certain religion. Now everybody just relax and enjoy the videos. :)
TheaterRaven 5 months ago 2
its a shame that they didnt mention the gods of the vikings :( because its really awesome
bratwurst080808 7 months ago 3
ok at 1:59 that cross is not a christian symbol. it has four equal arms and is circular. that cross would actually be a pagan cross.
dudeonthasopha 8 months ago 7
sounds like my penis
PPiTTislakatamia 8 months ago
Wikings - Masters of raid and wood.
MurdocLC 8 months ago
It's a shame how much Christianity spread. I'm so so happy it didn't take over east Asia.
And I'm glad Sweden isn't a very religious country.
MurdocLC 8 months ago 4
4 people got invaded by vikings
kachow234 11 months ago 6
trelleborg is in of sweden!
lolmasta100 11 months ago
@lolmasta100
oh yes but the Trelleborg in Sweden is a few hundred years younger
TheKristian1984 9 months ago
Vikings should wait for another 300 years...then you can rape and pillage Portugal and Spain monasteries (all that gold from the new world)! Converting to Christianity was stupid.
Microglia1 11 months ago 6
It was the rulers that saw Christianity as politically useful. Or rather it was bureaucratic structure of the Church and its monks that were useful as civil servants. Forget this bullshit about Christianity "bringing peace". Peace was brought to the kingdom by a large royalist army, while foreign-born priests and monks helped to revise the legal codes, and ministered to the local populace with the swords of the king's Housecarls and Gestir to back up the missionaries.
Vexille1983 1 year ago
@Vexille1983 yes that's right - the vikings used christianity when they could take advantage and didn't give a toss about it when it didn't suit them! the balance of power was very much in favour of the vikings not the christians - inferior people quickly become superstitious and live in fear - christianity in a nutshell for me! ofcourse they will try to take credit for anything they can - but the vikings played/toyed with the christians and did no more than pay lip servive when it suited them!!
rugbyboy198127 1 year ago
So the moral of the story is that the bloodthristy Viking barbarians found Jesus and settled down? Thats just stupid.
Snipe4261 1 year ago 2
@Snipe4261 It was :(
Bothorth 1 year ago
What if Christian dogs wouldnt have screwed it up? What if we still would worship Odin! Imagine what awsome culture it would be?? Hail Odin!!!!!
funnystarchild 1 year ago 5
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!
TheCoxblox 1 year ago
I don't like that they portray the Christianization of Scandinavia as a positive thing.
JayHiding 1 year ago 33
@JayHiding Word.
MurdocLC 8 months ago
Loki must be behind this shitty doc
shaolinadr 1 year ago 4
The so called "cross" in the middle of the fort is the Eye Of Odin at least they could get that part right!
Bigdawgaz1 1 year ago 3
Dragons on the horizon
RealityChickRCRU 1 year ago
Shame they didn't mention that the comming of christianity alls brought great conflict and WAR! The pagans didn't convert easily.
HaakonTheViking 1 year ago 3
that is what i call aok land
haramacad 1 year ago
I don't like when documentaries have narration over the end credits. Would it be so great a loss of chiched performance to have the program be a minute shorter so as to avoid distracting words cluttering the screen? I can't wait until they stop this ridiculous practice.
wpaxton 1 year ago
4.05...hohohohoho hey beavis...he said wood....hohohoho wood...
human20freedom 1 year ago
Being a dane I can never get used to the english pronounciation of city names, oh well.
Watching stuff like this really makes on proud of being a northman!
Bjerhof 1 year ago
Wonder why Haralds "empire" didn't include Sweden. Probably because the people in sweden were super Vikings which is a newly adopted term in scientific research
fread194 1 year ago
@fread194 Let me guess....you are Swedish?
ant12375 1 year ago
lol :) my thoughts exatly hehe
hwplugburz 1 year ago
They make it so romantic when they talk about vikings and christianity. They should read about King Olaf the St. and his half brother, Harald Hard-Ruler converting Norway by the tip of the sword.
No wonder we are the least christian post-christian nation in the world.
petkol 1 year ago 6
It's an American documentary don't get your hopes up. They usually make lowsy documentaries, but it was interesting non than less :)
Crux4nsata 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Good shit, I enjoyed it, by the way the Vikings DIDN'T settle North America, although many believe they did travel there, which is incredible seafaring.
MrJizmonkey 2 years ago
oh so the viking settlements in novia scotia and new england were indians... indians building forts and houses with the exact same way the vikings did.. even though the way the scandinavians constructed them was unique... of course. oh and all the sagas were wrong too, the thousand year old runes were all lying as well =)
ficklefackle 2 years ago 4
So what happened to them then??
MrJizmonkey 2 years ago
The North American settlements were abandoned fairly quickly. Their remains have been found.
anotherelvis 1 year ago
3-4 settlers trip. 200-400 people on that largest fleet, and they most likly stayed for a century in North-america.
petkol 1 year ago
@petkol Didn't know that fair enough, it just baffled me that there wasn't any when Columbus got there, I thought "settling" somewhere meant you made your home there and stayed there.
MrJizmonkey 1 year ago
@MrJizmonkey -- That's true, but then you die. And small numbers of settlers tend to not leave a genetic footprint. Same thing with the Anglian-Norse settlement of England -- a male war-lord elite who took over the Romano-British systems of governance (including their Latin titles). You leave the "natives" largely intact (warlords don't plow or clerk) and you marry or consort with local women; your grandchildren will start to "go native" and their progeny will be regarded as such.
MacLeamh 1 year ago
*Valhalla
silentsoliloquy82 2 years ago
I'm pissed at how this documentary barely mentioned the fact that the vikings settled North America, that's the most interesting thing I find about the Vikings.
ahmadclk 2 years ago 10
I would have like to have seen that too. Maybe even mention more on this 'rebellion'. I think they skipped a heap right there. Oh suddenly there was a rebellion. No there wasn't it was more than that.
18Porchmonkey 2 years ago 2
yeah and the raiding in france too
PureJordal 2 years ago 2
@ahmadclk they also made it into mars, if ya dont believe me ask Carl Sagan ;)
QuantumProphet 1 year ago
thor could beat down jesus :3
sploonsta 2 years ago 8
I kinda think that this video is BULLSHIT. It actually sort of pisses me off. They make it seem like the vikings fought against all christians because they were christian. What the fuck. It was no "holy war" like the christians used to conquer a lot. The vikings just straight up conquered and raided, there was no certain way of deciding who they'd go after. But on the other hand, i think that the video is somewhat good. Grrr
xburnyoutoashesx 2 years ago 7
Comment removed
maxwel2543 2 years ago
but all sin is equal in God's eye's. so technically, we're as bad as the vikings
william22250 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
well the ppl of sweden isnt the same as in the viking age because i have read that the vikings had larger brains then the modern sweds have today however i have a larger brain then most sweds though so i might still have a large viking brain :D
ghostriderblack89 2 years ago
Having a larger than usual head doesn't indicate greater intelligense. As in your case, it points to being thick as fcuk.
QueenRaeni 2 years ago
excuse me? :D
ghostriderblack89 2 years ago
It's probably just a tumour making your head bigger
titan5000 2 years ago 4
No.
ghostriderblack89 2 years ago
Comment removed
maxwel2543 2 years ago
all christians brake those comandments :D
ghostriderblack89 2 years ago
Comment removed
maxwel2543 2 years ago 2
u dont know if they did any of those fag shut up
SwIsHeRsAndOpTiMoS 2 years ago
blutstrudel, go back and watch the part of this with the talking to the dude about the long boats. Look at the damn boat, notice the obviously metal rivet heads? Now re-watch the same part, but this time listen to the guy say what type of IRON they used to build the damn boats. Write that crap down and google it Mr Butstrudel, after reading up a bit on what you found ask yourself " does this type of iron rust?" dumbass.
julienkip 2 years ago
Lame documentary. Could have been much more in-depth. Two stars.
ateapotist67 2 years ago 2
Just had to watch all 5 episodes...thanks for posting!
jettbugg 3 years ago 6
I from the area where fyrkat is built , close by lies by lies the town of hobro , my home town
madsdahlc 3 years ago
after harolds death the fortreses fell into decline
madsdahlc 3 years ago
lol.
Leif Ericsson did a hell of a job to make it to america without sails. Vikings were strong people but wtf? Longboats had sails because it´s impossible for the vikings to establish such a big trade/rading "empire" with just oars. I meen if ju have to use oars to get to england you would have to rest a year before storming the monastary.
thorleifspoon 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You know; I was trying to give you people some lesson in history, and boat making. Obviously non of you're an expert,like me in the subject so unless one of you are an expert be quiet. Because it make you seem ignorant to the subject.
Blutstrupfs 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Godsovs I know that they have some Viking Long Boat replicas, but if you noticed they were retrofitted with under water counter weights, so they could add the sails, because if not the boat will flip on its sides. It's impossible to keep these boat on the water with sails because of their slim built. these boats are made only with oars. because the oars are the only thing that kept them steady on the water without flipping. this is a scientific fact.
Blutstrupfs 3 years ago
Please don't state something is a 'fact' with nothing to back it up. Instead of arguing with folks, spend ten minutes of research time on the web. Then appologize to folks for spreading bad info.
Tanookiru 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You know what I'm expert in the subject Mr Tanokiru or Taco noodle whatever you're name.
Blutstrupfs 3 years ago
They had a clever design for the fortress but would have been easy to seige!
djwaglmuffin 3 years ago
Blutstrupfs:
In denmark we have reconstructed long boats, and other viking ships, WITH sails, and they seem to be sailing very well. In fact, there have just been a trip from Denmark (cant remember where) to northern england somewhere, with sails.
Having a lot of rescuing ships among them offcourse, if anything should go wrong.
Godsovs 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's nonsense that the Viking Long Boat or any Viking Boat for that matter had a sail. It will be impossible because the center of gravity would've flip the Boat on its sides. This boat were constructed to be use with Oars Only,to go up rivers and not for the fairy tale of open Ocean Exploration. The Titanic couldn't cross the same very waters and got hit by an Iceberg, imagine those Wooden Planck Boat crossing the same waters specially when there were more Iceberg on the water than now.
Blutstrupfs 3 years ago
It is the first time, that I have heard anyone dissing the design of the viking long boats.
If they were so horribly bad, I wonder why exactly the same basic design is still being used today all over Scandinavia. Go to any port and yoy will see, what I mean.
victor190779 3 years ago 2
My friend; I'm not dissing the Viking Long Boat is the truth, that they were made of wooden planks and not one them used any type of iron nails nor sails because in the burial grounds were they found them their was no evidence of such and to keep the wooden planks together they use wooden pecks and pine tree resin for glue and to protect the wood from rotting. These vessels were clearly use for lakes and river crossing not for Ocean crossing. Remember iron nails would have rotten by sea.
Blutstrupfs 3 years ago
No, they only tied in the ribs, not the hull. The hull was built first, joined with up to 700 kilos of iron nails, then the ribs fitted and secured. This is the reverse of more modern techniques. It gave a springiness to the frame so that the ship would flex when in use to releive strain on the wood.
You might also note that dhows have been sailing in the eastern seas with lashed-together hulls for many centuries.
Tanookiru 3 years ago
I seeing a Viking Long Boat with my own eyes and let me tell you not one of them have iron nails and they were not tide like you said. I repeat my self for the last time. They used wooden pecks for what will have kept the wooden planks together. If they would've used iron nails the sea water or any water for that matter would've rotten the nails and the boat would've sink nor would we have any Long Boats left to study OK. Mr. Taconuri
Blutstrupfs 3 years ago
@Blutstrupfs: what is your purpose for spreading disinformation like this. you say that the viking didn't use iron nails. but if you had spent the time to watch all 5 parts you would have seen in part 3 the more then 1000 your old viking ship that still had its nails preserved. the vikings was so smart that they could make non rusting nails. so stop claiming your an expert and admit your a lunatic running amok
2canines 2 years ago 2
A Christian Viking!?!
That totally ruins the point ov being a Viking!
Praise be to Odin!
Dimmuhead 3 years ago 6
I know!! Thats what pisses me off about this video.
HAIL ODIN!
xburnyoutoashesx 2 years ago 31
LOL.....it wasn't uncommon for someone to publicly pretend to convert to one religion, but continued to follow their own. I do agree with you that a Viking doesn't seem the same without Odin or Vahalla. :D
silentsoliloquy82 2 years ago
vikings were people who left to conquer and kill foreign tribes, essentially the same as the crusaders. just representing a different religion
ficklefackle 2 years ago
Fantastisk:-)
ankra12 3 years ago
Hail Bluetooth's son! Hail Sweyn Forkbeard!
BraedenRath 3 years ago 17
Yeah, seriously. Bluetooth was a sellout. Hail Forkbeard!
bobbymullinix 3 years ago 15
@bobbymullinix A good year and peace to you. Svend Tveskæg was the -real- hero. Harald was so detested in his own lifetime (uniter of Denmark bedamned) that his own SON could raise a rebellion against him and dethrone him. That really should tell people all they need to know.
Aslaug75 1 year ago 3