it doesn't matter if there was massive damage or not, the fact is that the buildings fell down too fast for it to be due to weakened steel or anything like that.
Ok folks, look at the pictures of the Oklahoma city building damage then ask yourself why didn't that building collapse in ten seconds ?...I'll tell you why,..because it wasn't prepped with demolitions and insured for millions of dollars against terrorist attacks like building 7 was, that's why. This terrorism racket is an art-form of trial and error.
they would never tell lies on purpose like "iraq has weapons of mass destruction" to get you to go along with a preemptive strike and nearly unilateral war ,would they?nah,they always tell the truth ,even if irag did have wmd though they would not have been a threat to us anyways,they had no icbm capability ,and neither does iran,
because the american government would never lie to the people & use the media,or i should say the corporations & military industrial complex who own the governement and the media ,would never do that to get you behind a war that only bennefited their bottom line & israel right,since they let the jews run the media ,though they dont directly control the agenda, though the rothschilds do own reuters which also owns AP which are the only sources where all western news comes from,the "newswires"
isnt it funny that 2 years in a row there was an attempted bombing on x-mas day,or 2 so called x-mas bombers in consecutive years, and the so called hero government was lauded as having saved the day and stopped it, and the media reports it like it was just some lone nut with an original idea, and their own idea ,but then it later comes out in both cases that they were stings and the government built the bombs and picked the dates and the targets for maximun fear/terror effect?
already ordered befor this incident and then right after it happened that zionist moussad, ADL connected slime chertoff was all over the news promoting the body scanners as a solution when he ownes the cOmpany that makes them and the plans to put them in were already in place before the underwear bomber thing ,ITS THE OLD HEGALIAN DIALECTIC
a sting oppertion and entrapped into whatever the government is charging them with ,its their MO and its the same fucking thing EVERY time ,look at the x-mas tree bomber,same thing ,then the media spins it like it was his idea to do it ona x-mas tree lighting ,but the government was cultivating this guy,grooming him for months and they picekd the date and target,and built the bomb, but themain stream media never reports that,and tries to cover it up,jusst like mutalab,the body scanners were
isnt it also funny that the government get many warning and chooses to ignore them in every case ? it has now come out that they got mutalab on the plane that x-mas and he was seen being led on the plane by a handler by a lawyer and his wife kurt haskell, look him up,plus mutalabs own father says he had tried to call the fbi and warn the government of what was going on ,and it fell on deaf ears,like in every other case,look into all these so called terrorists,there all either patsies or part of
it only stands to reason that if you catch the government blowing up the building in 93 and then again the okc murrah building in 95 that its obviously them again,watch the new documentary called a noble lie okc ,watch the interviews on here on the alex jones channel with the makers of the documentary and the police officers that were on the scene after the bombing that are speaking out against the government and saying they did it and were threatened with death
we know for a fact the fbi built the bomb that blew out the basement of the wtc in 93' and handed it of to their informant and did nothing to stop it, they even insisted on using a real bomb when the informant asked if the bomb was going to be fake ,and got suspicious and taped his handler,they would have brought the building down then ,if the truck had been parked right,this is classic government mo ,just like okc,so the government does okc and wtc 93,but not this riiight
but it dont really matter how the buildings fell or if they were demo'ed or not,or what hit the pentagon because all the other evidence is far more damning and indisputable compared to this unproveable trivial scientific evidence which people will always debate and question, so what if they did fall on their own from the planes it dont prove that it wasnt a moussad cia operation
is a zionist jew moussad agent, seriously how many jews that sound like this guy do you know that are part of a"patriot movement"? its almost laughable ,no wait it is RFOL ,watch war by deception and fabled enemies ,plus just cause the building was damaged on one side dont mean the whole thing would have collapsed symmetrically and at free fall speed in a few hours,if anything that side of the building would have collapsed not the whole thing,and not on a perfect symmetric fashion
@watertonrivers dont bother this is a moussad cointelpro opp, ask youself why this guy who sounds as jewish as jackie mason is here saying blatantly obvios things like"the real motive behind 9-11 was that the hijackers were mad cause the US supports israel"and "bush is lies when he say they hate us cause of our freedom"no shit, he is just pretending to be against the US support for israel to fool people and point the finger back at the muslims and away fro the US and israel cia/moussad cause he
WTC7 collapsed because Silverstein needed the Insurance money. Bottom line. Oh, and by the way if you're gonna go up against a big time conspiracy pro like Jones you'd better bring your mommy. Go climb back into your hole, and we'll let you know when the terrorists are gone asshole. (That gash in the building you talk about can't be seen BECAUSE OF ALL THE SMOKE)
OK I hate alex jones and his little annoying prick named Jason Bermas.. but if you seriously think that, building 7 that fell at free small speed into it's own foot print, and larry silverstein, admitting it that " they pulled it " , and dintegrated into dust was caused by a fire or building damage, GET OFF THE CRACK PIPE.. CONTROLLED DEMO ALL DAY, 2000 STUCTURAL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS DIS AGREE WITH YOU MORONS..
Don't believe the government would attack it's own people for the purpose of stirring up support for a war? Study History.
Operation Northwoods was a series of false-flag proposals that originated within the United States government in 1962. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war
IF YOU SEE BALDNESS IN A PARKING LOT OR STORE REPORT IT TO ME , WATCH THE VIDEO IMPEACH BALDNESS FOREVER AND THE VID IMPEACH BALDNESS FOREVER VIDEO 2 AND SEE HOW A BALD GUY GOT HIS HAIR BACK IN 23 WEEKS FLAT WITH ZX 42 , ITS THE BEST IN THE WORLD , I GOT TIRED OF SCUMBAG CORPORATIONS RIPPING ME OFF SO WE PUT 3 YEARS OF HARDCORE RESEARCH INTO ZX 42
yup i can see some minor damage but not damge that would cause a freefall straight down collapse other building like wtc6 were a lot more damaged by falling debris and they didn't fall< for a photographer supposedly there to show major damage you'd expect better photographs of the damage he says there is
@newworldodour There is more than just that one picture. It would be a fallacy to think that its the =only evidence of major damage to the building. There's arial footage of the building with the massive damage. This was taken from helicopter footage after the collapses of the Twin Towers. There is also the spoken words of FDNY personnel that were evacuating the building before the collapse. It's not hard to find. I even had a CBS report of WTC in danger of collapse 30 minutes prior.
@ne1foa69 yes and while watching in the UK we saw a report 30 minutes before WTC7 fell by janes stanely on the BBC, you just cannot trrust media or governments, sometthing stinks real bad
BBC announced building7 collapsed 26min in advance (!) how would you lizards explain this!!?! but i'm not defending AJ because he himself is a part of a conspiracy theory in a conspiracy theory in a conspiracy theory to hide the real truth which most people wouldn't comprehend anyway , so Fthis.
In the video first of all the reporter did not have have much information to go with as she said "the details are very, very sketchy". The firefighters had already evacuated the area and probably told the BBC that the building is going to collapse. The BBC just jumped on the story imediatly like the media does and said that the building is collapsing.
@marvelfannumber1 I can attest to the news reports on CBS radio that day. I left the tv coverage and had to go to the store. I kept the news coverage going on the radio as most of all normal broadcasts of music was interrupted for the 9/11 attacks. Tower 1 and 2 already collapsed, but the news feed stated that yet another ( building 7) was in danger of collapse. 30 minutes later the CBS radio feed reports that it finally did come down.
However, the Truthers latched on to the BBC report alone.
@isbemorph Please, don't be lazy. And don't let irrational paranoid notions grow into this elaborate web you can't work your way out of. As I explained in one other post, the BBC was not the only news source to make a report 30 minutes prior to the collapse. In fact, other news agencies made similar reports about the possible impending collapse of WTC. What you're doing is what many out there do, which is to grab on to the few strands to make your case, while brushing away the others.
@ne1foa69 there seem to be questions at every scene of destruction concerning 9/11 which goes to show the incompetance of government agencies. they did it, with outside help, but very badly. also the pentagon , no aeroplane parts ,and no tail and wing damage to that part of the building before it collapsed, thats just lazy. council style man
Thanks for this. Hope you dont mind if I add this to my fuck truthers section. Truthers are a mentally ill plague on us, and we have to show the fence sitters how full of shit they are. Thanks again.
alex jones can be such a disinfo now and then, just ignore him in case he starts over-acting and behaving himself like a clown, there is lots of other 911 info out there, try those.
If we are trying to determine who is more of a charlatan, I would have to say it is the guy arguing that a building would collapse straight down at practically free fall speed due to heavy damage on one side of the building.... just sayin.
With the exception of this video, I have only nodded my head to every Representative Press video I've seen... but why "charlatans"? Charlatans is defined as, "A person falsely claiming to have a special knowledge or skill; a fraud." I don't think Alex Jones claims to have special knowledge or skill, other than looking at empirical evidence and having a worldview that informs the view that the media and powerful institutions lie... which is totally consistent with Rep Press.
Really Representativepress? Did you really feel the need to bring up this trash again? Yeah we know they are a bunch of Charlatans, but their movement is dead. Why the need to beat a dead horse?
They dont deserve the attention that youre giving them.
For the best collection of evidence refuting the official conspiracy theory please watch all 4 (Sept 08-11) days of the "Toronto Hearings" on the events of September 11, 2001.
Expert Witnesses and guest speakers:
James Gourley, Lance deHaven-Smith, David Ray Griffin, Kevin Ryan, Jay Kolar, Paul Zarembka, Barbara Honegger, Richard Gage, Michel Chossudovsky, Cynthia McKinney, Graeme MacQueen, David Chandler, Jon Cole, Kevin Ryan, Niels Harrit, Peter Dale Scott, Laurie Manwell, Senator Mike Gravel.
For the best collection of evidence refuting the official conspiracy theory please watch all 4 (Sept 08-11) days of the "Toronto Hearings" on the events of September 11, 2001.
Expert Witnesses and guest speakers:
James Gourley, Lance deHaven-Smith, David Ray Griffin, Kevin Ryan, Jay Kolar, Paul Zarembka, Barbara Honegger, Richard Gage, Michel Chossudovsky, Cynthia McKinney, Graeme MacQueen, David Chandler, Jon Cole, Kevin Ryan, Niels Harrit, Peter Dale Scott, Laurie Manwell, Senator Mike Gravel.
Hey dipshit, I know you think that 9/11 wasnt an inside job and that truthers are retarded, and that it was our support for Israel pissed off the muslims, but did you ever stop and think that our govt did this is an excuse to go to war to fight Israel's enemies? You can have your cake and eat it too ya jackwagon. Our govt pulled of the 9/11 incident to go to war against Israel's enemies.
After D.B. Cooper hijacked a plane in 71, by 1973 all planes that fly off course, have a major passenger disturbance (captain has a button to push), set off an alarm at the take off control tower and the destination control tower. The tower controlers have the ability to remote control the planes if this happens. This didnt happen on 9/11.
Not to mention if planes fly more then two miles off course NORAD sends fighter jets to intercept them. This didnt happen either.
So the BBC in England are part of this huuuge conspiracy too? Haha, those "truthers" are truly crazy/retarded! By the way, I just saw that the guy who started "Loose Change" is no longer a "truther"! That's great, but I guess that truthers will be a problem for a long time still. : )
the 911 co-chair himself is saying a new investigation is needed, because he thinks theirs was intended to fail. why would the investigation be intended to fail if insiders are not guilty?
pointing fingers at people who just suck at making claims, theories, documentaries etc, that use the wrong words and distort, that are too fanatic, DOES NOT CHANGE the obvious reality: 911 investigation was covered, and its a safe assumption that someone covering a crime also had something to do with it.
@markmaxy125 You are yourself now omitting details. For instance the remains of U93 that are locked in Iron Mountain. All other crashed planes are seen in detail in the media, but not a glimpse of U93. That has nothing to do with foreign policy.
Alex Jones is our only hope against the Illuminati. Except that actually he is working for them. Or so he thinks. That's what the reptoids want him to think. Or so the reptoids think. That's what the Thule society wants them to think. But actually the Thule society is controlled by a gerbil inside a brain inside a box inside a KFC INSIDE A STARBUCKS INSIDE A BOOKSTORE.
~ if damage down one side caused it to collapse, then the building would have buckled and fallen that direction ... that's physics ... according to live video, the building buckled at center top and fell in on itself ... into a nice pile within its own footprint ... very nice work too, gotta be a bummer for the pros who set it up, not being able to take credit for their artistry on those 3 buildings
Experts and witnesses are bought and sold just like all of the other US slave professions. The defense pays for it's experts, the prosecution pays for it's witnesses, and vice versa. Who to believe? Who knows. Truth is too often stranger than fiction. Just because we're(conspiracy realists) paranoid doesn't mean someone isn't out to get us.
3 steel framed building collapsing due to fire in one day. In the history of mankind... it's never happened before and it's never happened since. Never ever.
1) I spent the week of 9/11 looking for my youngest son. I found him on 9?15 alive. Thank God.
2) I grew up with the family who owned thebiggest demolition company in Connecticut. I don't know about ths photo expert. But I know the WTC-7 video is a controlled demolition. I believed the official story until January 4th, 2007 when I saw the video of WTC-7 coming down a) at free fall speed and 2) landing inside it's footprint.
@tradingbarracuda What, then, do you maintain would have been the 'proper' way for Building 7 to fall, if it had suffered structural damage on one side, and had not been a controlled demolition?...since you're an 'expert' and all...having 'grown up with the family who owned the biggest demolition company in Connecticut.' (Impressive credentials) Description and examples, please, as your evidence.
@TheMercilessEye How many buildings have you seen imploded in real life? Did you know that this building was heavily fortified - literally re-built when Solomon Brothers became the main tenent in 1988. They wanted a more open floor plan so the building was gutted and reinforced internally with an ADDITIONAL superstructure. Later the SEC, CIA, FBI-NY and the Mayors emergency management office became tenets. Several floors were additionally fortified to withstand fires and bombing.
@tradingbarracuda I asked you answer a question and requested you to supply evidence. You've done neither. Congratulations on the piss-poor obfuscation.
@TheMercilessEye It would have fallen into the damaged corner. It did not. Stop wasting my time. Go bang your head against a real skyscraper -- to test for certified steel and certified concrete. Then open your mind and go do the research. It's out there if you're willing to be wrong. I was stuck like you for 6 years believing the official story. Then I was willing to "see" truth. Controlled demolition makes far more sense than collapse due to fire.
@tradingbarracuda I'm not the one wasting your time: you're doing a bang-up job of that all by yourself. As the claimant, the burden of proof is upon you, not me. "Controlled demolition makes far more sense than collapse due to fire" - submit your evidence supporting this. Answer the question and furnish your evidence, or be disregarded. Argument from authority is worthless.
You are a braver man than me representantivepress. Keep up the great work. I get too emotional to argue with idiots on the internet. (the idiots being the brainwashed public in general, not the 9/11 truthers. I don't agree with the truthers and find them to be a distraction from the real political issues, but in they are better informed than 90% of the people out there regarding the rotting hypocrisy that is government propaganda)
@representativepress To be fair, when does Alex Jones ever not come off as an insensitive, arrogant, phoney, snake oil peddling, impervious to fact or reason blowhard? ;)
When the port authority said "pull it" they meant the rescue operation. Pull it is not a controlled demolition term at all. Look it up and you can find it out for yourself. The port authority pulled the firefighters out because they felt it unsafe and also "it's going to collapse". It also suffered structural failure and did collapse.
Don't worry I will make your tears go away and subscribe since all these troofers are leaving you. Go fucking figure that they don't want to hear something that conflicts with their point of view.....sounds familiar of a conspiracy theorist! I don't want to hear what your saying so I will just ignore you and insult you and that makes it all better!
The only disappointing thing about this video is that you're still entertaining and interacting with these conspiracy whack-jobs. I know it's infuriating that some people only seem capable of listening to Alex "everyone but me is a gatekeeper" Jones rather than reading, say, Chomsky but it's been 10 years, I'm not sure these idiots can be persuaded otherwise.
The issue isn't what one should do with the truth, the issue is how one identifies it.
How do you decide what is true? Are you able to describe the process? If you are not, what do you think that says about the reliability of the process?
If you don't think about thinking, are you really thinking at all?
@ImMichaelTaylor I have identified the statements in this video as "the truth". I've done all the neccessary thinking to come to that conclusion. Perhaps if you can specifically tell me where you have gotten lost along the way I can help you out.
@ImMichaelTaylor First of all, fuck you. Secondly, your "question" comes off as rhetorical nonsense. I can answer it easy enough though.
Q: "How do you decide what is true?"
A: Logic and evidence.
So that's the end of that little game.
Now, if you have some specific objection the my interpretation of truth that you would like to discuss the reasoning behind please raise it and I'll be happy to educate you Otherwise, STFU.
disappointed!! an intelligent person like you would believe these government lies. Sorry mate..gotta unsub now..!!! Lost your credibility their mate!!!
@SuperxSharpxShooter this is not true. I've seen analysis from a mechanical engineer showing that the impulse from the weight of the top floors would easily crash through the floor beneath it... and on it went.
@gbell12 The building was carrying that "weight" for years unless godzilla landed on it, now that would be "weight" strong enough to make it go down
and if what you say is true then due to the massive size and height of that building wouldn't be reasonable that it would fall down sideways rather then straight down this proves that the building roots was damaged intentionally.
I have my own conspiracy theory which is that corporate agents, e.g. Fox News, are deliberately promulgating conspiracy theories to keep the "Great Uneducated" so busy chasing their own tails they won't notice their increasing economic and political marginalisation.
@TimothyTwoofer That is exactly right....no one is addressing foreign policy of the United States or how it got to this point! Better yet how this can all be avoided in the future!
In order to buy Alex Jones BS you have to assume that every scientist and professional in the world who actually is expert on these matters is part of a conspiracy. That means it's unanimous - they are all lying.
You couldn't get that many people to play patty cake unanimously.
Saying all these buildings fell at free fall is ridiculous. You need nothing underneath to free fall. They fell to their foundations which is what "ground zero" stands for.
Truther deny the damage of building 7 because they only show their followers one side of the picture. They never show you the back of building 7 which was sheared off from the damage. Look behind building 7 and you will see how damaged it really was.
Truthers a re ignorant fools and willing tools for Muslim extremism.
Why are you people insistent on believing these crazy conspiracies that waste hours of your time when you can research things worth while like Tom does.
I find it interesting that while you try to (unsuccessfully) debunk the WTC7 falling into it's own footprint, you don't attempt to do the same with both towers. Also, I have never seen a video from you discussing Flight 93 where there is absolutely no evidence of a plane even crashing in that field or the fact that you have never actually seen a plane strike the Pentagon. You seemed explicity focused on WTC7 and NYC. Can I ask why that is?
We know that WTC7 fell. Why ? Damage. Impact from planes ? No. The 2 towers fell down, straight down, by means of gravity, and lack of resistance. So one could argue that the impacts spread fuel and oxygen to generate that fire & heat. WTC7, was it fire ? or demolition ? or both ? Buildings have sprinkler systems and fire also takes fuel & oxygen. If fire, something kept it stoked really well. I've seen fire departments train on old houses like that.
look, the BOTTOM line is that the official story is a fucking lie. Who benefits? That's all you need to ask. If 9-11 was not an inside job, I'm a cow.
@tseitz123 'Who benefits? That's all you need to ask" actually no, that is not how the world works. Just becaus someone enifits doesn't mean they DID it.
@representativepress Hey, Appreciate your videos, always informative. Permit me to go off-topic, but what was the name of that final music piece in the end of the video? It's driving me crazy on where I've heard it before. Thanx.
@representativepress No, actually he does make a point. Larry Silverstein took out an insurance policy one specifically from terrorist attacks. Fine maybe that is normal for government buildings. But also they're were a lot of important documents there. Especially in WTC 7 about the ENRON scandal. Not only that but the government has a horrible track record I'm sure you know this all too well. I'm on the fence about this one.
@representativepress but it makes it pretty reasonable. If a crime is at court and they dont have suspects, what question are they asking ? They asking who would benevit from that crime. As trust un the truthfull words of gouvernment representatives is well shrinking day by day, we do not fully believe in the official version. gouvernments proof their affinity to profane lies and public stultification. so dont be wondering about ppl searching the truth.
i found a big nail in my tyre this morning, obviously the guy from the tyre shop round the corner is going round in the middle of the night placing nails under tyres, i mean just look at who benefits.
sigh,
also i was burgled last year, i go a nice insurance settlement, so obviously i burgled my own house by your fucking warped sense of critical thought
@TimothyTwoofer LMAO! That is pretty funny actually! Totally true too....I guess you are a reveler of truth when it comes to the tire conspiracy in your town....oh yeah and a thief....can't forget your a thief too!
@tseitz123 The fundamentalist Moslems also benefited, I believe, with a concerted 'revenge shot' against the USA's support for Israeli oppression of the Palestinians. Is this all you've got?
To believe this exterior damage was enough to cause a catastrophic failure of the "entire" center core (concrete reinforced steel core), which even basic construction laymen know hold high rises up... is naive!
Buildings topple over and/or break into sections from these forms of damage, they do not collapse in on themselves, impossible, or we are in big trouble if our architects and engineers are designing and building shit this weak!
Man there is still a big campaign of lies going on, amazing!
@ISENTRY For an explanation of the collapse please read this article in its entirety BEFORE replying, "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation" Eagar and Musso pub in JOM the journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, available free online, just copy the title into a search engine.
Quote, "To summarize all of these points, a 500,000 t(on) structure has too much inertia to fall in any direction other than nearly straight down. "
@ISENTRY You see this is why I question these so called reports, it states in this article that a 767 carry 90,000 L gallons, when on that morning flight 11 was only carrying approximately 10,000 US gallons- 8,300 IMP gallons, it is these kinds of reports that exaggerate and distort the truth! So if they are wrong about what the planes carried in fuel (Big Time) what else are they twisting in this articles?
@ISENTRY And yes L gallons is litres, but 10,000 US gallons turns about to be less then 40,000 US gallons, why would this report say that a 767 carries 90,000 L gallons of fuel, sorry that is deception!
@ISENTRY Flight 175 was carrying also 10,000 US gallons of fuel that morning, Not 90,000 L gallons as the report also says!
wikipedia/_Flight_175. also that when liquids impact something at those speeds the majority of the liquid VAPORIZES into those large balls of fire that the world saw! It is impossible in my science that 10,000 US gallons of fuel stopped and came to rest in pools while everything else disintegrated!
If you believe that this virtually superficial damage to the structure would cause it to collapse at free fall speed, with no resistance, into its own footprint with not much more than a pile of dust remaining..........................YOU ARE DUMBER THAN A ROCK THAN A LEARNING DISORDER!!!
2 Peter 3:5 "For this they willingly are ignorant............"
why did you post this shit video? OMG! they have new photographs! yeah right! after what? 10 yrs? I could pretty much photo shop a fucking picture of the pentagon being hit by a UFO and make it believable in less than 2 months! now, why didn't they show this pics right away? what happened man? MIB's got to u and sold out or what? you got scared? r u pulling a Charlie V? or what? it's ok you were meant to change nothing anyway! mind as well shut down your channel & stop wasting our time.
Good Video. the criticism you recieve is typically irrational, close minded, and biased. Alex Jones is full of shit I stopped listening to him a while ago.
Bermas can't debate, can't see and or can't tell the truth. These are the same people who denied that there was any evidence that flight 93 crashed despite the fact that most of the plane was recovered. There is at least one other photo of building 7 which shows the extent of the damage in more clear light. It is not hard to see how debris from one of the other towers could have damaged 7 enough and spread fire intense enough to bring it down after the SEVERAL HOURS it took to fall.
Its not that building 7 couldn't have fallen by the damage it is the way it has fallen that is suspicious the damage was located in specific points in the building. If these points were weak enough to collapse the building would not collapse in a vertical way like it did it would collapse in the parts where it was weakened and fall sideways. This collapse was textbook demolition.
Bermas can't debate, can't see and or can't tell the truth. These are the same people who denied that there was any evidence flight 93 despite the fact that most of the plane was recovered. There is at least one other photo of building 7 which shows the extent of the damage in more clear light. It is not hard to see how debris from one of the other towers could have damaged 7 enough and spread fire intense enough to bring it down after the SEVERAL HOURS it took to fall.
JUST LOOK at the both towers when they collapse. the top collapses on an angle first, then goes down. if this weight was enough to instantly overpower the floors directly under it as explain in the 9/11 report, why didnt the top continue on the same path as its momentum and fall to the side of the building.
saw a video of building 7 lastnight, and the fires were much more extensive then just a few rooms here and there, with that being said no building ever in the history of steel framed structures has ever collasped from fire. there was plenty of damage also but it surley would not have caused it to fall into its own foot print
this is redicules you guys are from now on are on the side of the elite bastards.Ive followed you guys for a very long time and now im putting you guys into the relm of trolls.When you side with the elite murderers and you know you are i wont be a part of your low life conduct,As far as im concerned your no better then those cut throats
@surfjerr do you even know what your saying? You guys? Your not speaking to a private group that all has meetings together. Your speaking to a VIRTUAL GROUP/UNION that your picturing exits as a REAL PRIVATE collecitive interacting secret UNION. You can pull yourself to reality NOW, but you have to turn the choice around.
Right, this whole debate has taken a left turn. The fact is that building 7 needed to fall down regardless of how it fell. Too many powerful people had vested interest in it's collapse. Whether it was demolished or not is beside the point that all the gold was moved from it and that it was a convenient way to destroy thousands of incriminating files. I ask myself, what is the point of this video? And I answer, to curb the debate into meaninglessness.
@aghoranathi bingo on the left turn. not true on the meaningless. Unless you make it true. Make it a awareness that to get to the truth YOU must believe FALSE REALITYs first before you ALTER them into the truth later. This does not make one stupid, it makes us all in a termperary state of ever changing ignorance. This video may curb the debate away from the critical truths, however it curbs it where its already has been curbed and helps STOP that curb. That helps more than most believe.
I laugh at humanity while reading these comments. All of you believing in the 9/11 delusion are completely mislead. I mean, you all claim the government is fooling everyone and trying to mislead everyone from the truth. So what, Alex Jones and other assholes like him don't do the same thing? I just love how these morons are treated like freedom fighters when they even are feeding the fuel of lies continuously.
May God help you all, because you guys really need it.
@AngryIntellectual "I laugh at humanity" LoL how is one able to do that? Humanity is an abstract, how is one able to hold or grasp it as a whole? Now if you laugh at truthers, then it makes sense. That made ME laugh.
it doesn't matter if there was massive damage or not, the fact is that the buildings fell down too fast for it to be due to weakened steel or anything like that.
Lost6001 1 week ago
Ok folks, look at the pictures of the Oklahoma city building damage then ask yourself why didn't that building collapse in ten seconds ?...I'll tell you why,..because it wasn't prepped with demolitions and insured for millions of dollars against terrorist attacks like building 7 was, that's why. This terrorism racket is an art-form of trial and error.
crusty21 1 week ago
Men are from Mars,
Women from Venus
but conspirators
come from Uranus
Dave83C 1 month ago
this is bullshit...they way these buildings are made...half of that building could fall and not affect the other half...
angrynhpatriot 1 month ago
these fuckers are gonna burn in hell
Wrothchild 1 month ago
they would never tell lies on purpose like "iraq has weapons of mass destruction" to get you to go along with a preemptive strike and nearly unilateral war ,would they?nah,they always tell the truth ,even if irag did have wmd though they would not have been a threat to us anyways,they had no icbm capability ,and neither does iran,
bulletproof2353 2 months ago
because the american government would never lie to the people & use the media,or i should say the corporations & military industrial complex who own the governement and the media ,would never do that to get you behind a war that only bennefited their bottom line & israel right,since they let the jews run the media ,though they dont directly control the agenda, though the rothschilds do own reuters which also owns AP which are the only sources where all western news comes from,the "newswires"
bulletproof2353 2 months ago
isnt it funny that 2 years in a row there was an attempted bombing on x-mas day,or 2 so called x-mas bombers in consecutive years, and the so called hero government was lauded as having saved the day and stopped it, and the media reports it like it was just some lone nut with an original idea, and their own idea ,but then it later comes out in both cases that they were stings and the government built the bombs and picked the dates and the targets for maximun fear/terror effect?
bulletproof2353 2 months ago
already ordered befor this incident and then right after it happened that zionist moussad, ADL connected slime chertoff was all over the news promoting the body scanners as a solution when he ownes the cOmpany that makes them and the plans to put them in were already in place before the underwear bomber thing ,ITS THE OLD HEGALIAN DIALECTIC
bulletproof2353 2 months ago
a sting oppertion and entrapped into whatever the government is charging them with ,its their MO and its the same fucking thing EVERY time ,look at the x-mas tree bomber,same thing ,then the media spins it like it was his idea to do it ona x-mas tree lighting ,but the government was cultivating this guy,grooming him for months and they picekd the date and target,and built the bomb, but themain stream media never reports that,and tries to cover it up,jusst like mutalab,the body scanners were
bulletproof2353 2 months ago
isnt it also funny that the government get many warning and chooses to ignore them in every case ? it has now come out that they got mutalab on the plane that x-mas and he was seen being led on the plane by a handler by a lawyer and his wife kurt haskell, look him up,plus mutalabs own father says he had tried to call the fbi and warn the government of what was going on ,and it fell on deaf ears,like in every other case,look into all these so called terrorists,there all either patsies or part of
bulletproof2353 2 months ago
it only stands to reason that if you catch the government blowing up the building in 93 and then again the okc murrah building in 95 that its obviously them again,watch the new documentary called a noble lie okc ,watch the interviews on here on the alex jones channel with the makers of the documentary and the police officers that were on the scene after the bombing that are speaking out against the government and saying they did it and were threatened with death
bulletproof2353 2 months ago
we know for a fact the fbi built the bomb that blew out the basement of the wtc in 93' and handed it of to their informant and did nothing to stop it, they even insisted on using a real bomb when the informant asked if the bomb was going to be fake ,and got suspicious and taped his handler,they would have brought the building down then ,if the truck had been parked right,this is classic government mo ,just like okc,so the government does okc and wtc 93,but not this riiight
bulletproof2353 2 months ago
but it dont really matter how the buildings fell or if they were demo'ed or not,or what hit the pentagon because all the other evidence is far more damning and indisputable compared to this unproveable trivial scientific evidence which people will always debate and question, so what if they did fall on their own from the planes it dont prove that it wasnt a moussad cia operation
bulletproof2353 2 months ago
is a zionist jew moussad agent, seriously how many jews that sound like this guy do you know that are part of a"patriot movement"? its almost laughable ,no wait it is RFOL ,watch war by deception and fabled enemies ,plus just cause the building was damaged on one side dont mean the whole thing would have collapsed symmetrically and at free fall speed in a few hours,if anything that side of the building would have collapsed not the whole thing,and not on a perfect symmetric fashion
bulletproof2353 2 months ago
@watertonrivers dont bother this is a moussad cointelpro opp, ask youself why this guy who sounds as jewish as jackie mason is here saying blatantly obvios things like"the real motive behind 9-11 was that the hijackers were mad cause the US supports israel"and "bush is lies when he say they hate us cause of our freedom"no shit, he is just pretending to be against the US support for israel to fool people and point the finger back at the muslims and away fro the US and israel cia/moussad cause he
bulletproof2353 2 months ago
@representativepress You've got to watch David Chandler's youtube channel, before you post crap like this.
watertonrivers 2 months ago
Just one question for Einstein at the beginning of the video?
"So, what could of caused this damage?"
DJCW 3 months ago
@DJCW a 110 story high skyscraper side swiping it.
MegaYeshua33 3 months ago
@MegaYeshua33 I must of missed that clip on FOX News.
DJCW 3 months ago
@DJCW It was on a movie called loose change,not fox news
MegaYeshua33 3 months ago
the fat guy at the beginning is full of shit!
drewsiboberinski 3 months ago
Alex Jones is not human, he's just an evil android.
(just do a YouTube search)
KimmoKuopio 3 months ago
WTC7 collapsed because Silverstein needed the Insurance money. Bottom line. Oh, and by the way if you're gonna go up against a big time conspiracy pro like Jones you'd better bring your mommy. Go climb back into your hole, and we'll let you know when the terrorists are gone asshole. (That gash in the building you talk about can't be seen BECAUSE OF ALL THE SMOKE)
LanesLab 4 months ago
why is that?
gerryboy3699 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was an inside job, let there be no mistake!!
FlyingDutchman65 4 months ago
OK I hate alex jones and his little annoying prick named Jason Bermas.. but if you seriously think that, building 7 that fell at free small speed into it's own foot print, and larry silverstein, admitting it that " they pulled it " , and dintegrated into dust was caused by a fire or building damage, GET OFF THE CRACK PIPE.. CONTROLLED DEMO ALL DAY, 2000 STUCTURAL ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS DIS AGREE WITH YOU MORONS..
Hkhan23 4 months ago
The Tribe blew up Building 7 and the plus the other pre-wired buildings, full of people.
DivineFellowship 4 months ago
Don't believe the government would attack it's own people for the purpose of stirring up support for a war? Study History.
Operation Northwoods was a series of false-flag proposals that originated within the United States government in 1962. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war
gutzs 4 months ago
IF YOU SEE BALDNESS IN A PARKING LOT OR STORE REPORT IT TO ME , WATCH THE VIDEO IMPEACH BALDNESS FOREVER AND THE VID IMPEACH BALDNESS FOREVER VIDEO 2 AND SEE HOW A BALD GUY GOT HIS HAIR BACK IN 23 WEEKS FLAT WITH ZX 42 , ITS THE BEST IN THE WORLD , I GOT TIRED OF SCUMBAG CORPORATIONS RIPPING ME OFF SO WE PUT 3 YEARS OF HARDCORE RESEARCH INTO ZX 42
zx42impeachbaldness 5 months ago
yup i can see some minor damage but not damge that would cause a freefall straight down collapse other building like wtc6 were a lot more damaged by falling debris and they didn't fall< for a photographer supposedly there to show major damage you'd expect better photographs of the damage he says there is
newworldodour 5 months ago
@newworldodour There is more than just that one picture. It would be a fallacy to think that its the =only evidence of major damage to the building. There's arial footage of the building with the massive damage. This was taken from helicopter footage after the collapses of the Twin Towers. There is also the spoken words of FDNY personnel that were evacuating the building before the collapse. It's not hard to find. I even had a CBS report of WTC in danger of collapse 30 minutes prior.
ne1foa69 4 months ago
@ne1foa69 yes and while watching in the UK we saw a report 30 minutes before WTC7 fell by janes stanely on the BBC, you just cannot trrust media or governments, sometthing stinks real bad
newworldodour 4 months ago
BBC announced building7 collapsed 26min in advance (!) how would you lizards explain this!!?! but i'm not defending AJ because he himself is a part of a conspiracy theory in a conspiracy theory in a conspiracy theory to hide the real truth which most people wouldn't comprehend anyway , so Fthis.
isbemorph 5 months ago
@isbemorph
I will explain it.
In the video first of all the reporter did not have have much information to go with as she said "the details are very, very sketchy". The firefighters had already evacuated the area and probably told the BBC that the building is going to collapse. The BBC just jumped on the story imediatly like the media does and said that the building is collapsing.
marvelfannumber1 5 months ago
@marvelfannumber1 I can attest to the news reports on CBS radio that day. I left the tv coverage and had to go to the store. I kept the news coverage going on the radio as most of all normal broadcasts of music was interrupted for the 9/11 attacks. Tower 1 and 2 already collapsed, but the news feed stated that yet another ( building 7) was in danger of collapse. 30 minutes later the CBS radio feed reports that it finally did come down.
However, the Truthers latched on to the BBC report alone.
ne1foa69 4 months ago
@isbemorph Please, don't be lazy. And don't let irrational paranoid notions grow into this elaborate web you can't work your way out of. As I explained in one other post, the BBC was not the only news source to make a report 30 minutes prior to the collapse. In fact, other news agencies made similar reports about the possible impending collapse of WTC. What you're doing is what many out there do, which is to grab on to the few strands to make your case, while brushing away the others.
ne1foa69 4 months ago
@ne1foa69 there seem to be questions at every scene of destruction concerning 9/11 which goes to show the incompetance of government agencies. they did it, with outside help, but very badly. also the pentagon , no aeroplane parts ,and no tail and wing damage to that part of the building before it collapsed, thats just lazy. council style man
mikerevs34 3 months ago
bwhahaha i fucking love the thumbnail for this they both look like total fucking faggots!
ogdemigod 5 months ago
FUCK ALEX JONES AND FUCK ALL HIS BRAINLESS SHEEP
ogdemigod 5 months ago
@ogdemigod leave his sheep alone...sheep were not meant for such treatment. Sure, shave them and eat them....fine but what you suggest is just wrong!
mikesglider 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ogdemigod leave his sheep alone...sheep were not meant for such treatment. Sure, shave them and eat them....fine but what you suggest is just wrong!
mikesglider 5 months ago
@ogdemigod what you got going that is better?
gerryboy3699 4 months ago
@gerryboy3699 everything obviously i am not a retard.
ogdemigod 4 months ago
@ogdemigod nothing then
gerryboy3699 4 months ago
@gerryboy3699 is it hard to talk with Alex Jone's tiny penis in your mouth? or are you just a mumbler?
ogdemigod 4 months ago
@ogdemigod YOUR NOT WORTH IT SCUMBAG
gerryboy3699 4 months ago
@gerryboy3699 that's what your father said when you were born
ogdemigod 4 months ago
@ogdemigod your father vomited when you fell out your mothers areshole
gerryboy3699 4 months ago
@gerryboy3699 lmao i vomited when you fell out Alex Jone's Areshole.
ogdemigod 4 months ago
@ogdemigod your mother is a fat slut
gerryboy3699 4 months ago
@gerryboy3699 haha!! your losing steam.. just like Alex does when nothing he says ever comes true!
ogdemigod 4 months ago
@ogdemigod correct im losing steam, thats because im not autistic like you
gerryboy3699 4 months ago
@gerryboy3699 BUY MORE SILVER!! you poor ass fool.
ogdemigod 4 months ago
@ogdemigod no answer was the loud reply
gerryboy3699 4 months ago
LALALALALA I'M NOT LISTENING
8w9hf89hw 5 months ago
Thanks for this. Hope you dont mind if I add this to my fuck truthers section. Truthers are a mentally ill plague on us, and we have to show the fence sitters how full of shit they are. Thanks again.
TheCaptainLulz 5 months ago
alex jones can be such a disinfo now and then, just ignore him in case he starts over-acting and behaving himself like a clown, there is lots of other 911 info out there, try those.
hackerdeehack 5 months ago
Good job on this vid. F those scumbag troofer idiots
vilemonkey 5 months ago
This gap-tooth loud breathing idiot and muppet-head routine is getting old.
Hopefully people will either start paying attention to the facts, or just fade away like the JFK conspiracy loons.
charbroiledmonk1033 5 months ago
Thanks RP for your work. Greetings from a french Man living in Germany .
louminto 5 months ago
If we are trying to determine who is more of a charlatan, I would have to say it is the guy arguing that a building would collapse straight down at practically free fall speed due to heavy damage on one side of the building.... just sayin.
GrassrootsWorldview 5 months ago
With the exception of this video, I have only nodded my head to every Representative Press video I've seen... but why "charlatans"? Charlatans is defined as, "A person falsely claiming to have a special knowledge or skill; a fraud." I don't think Alex Jones claims to have special knowledge or skill, other than looking at empirical evidence and having a worldview that informs the view that the media and powerful institutions lie... which is totally consistent with Rep Press.
GrassrootsWorldview 5 months ago
@GrassrootsWorldview If you listen, you can hear Alex Jones use the word "charlatans", hence the use of this word by RP. Irony.
nicolibri 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Really Representativepress? Did you really feel the need to bring up this trash again? Yeah we know they are a bunch of Charlatans, but their movement is dead. Why the need to beat a dead horse?
They dont deserve the attention that youre giving them.
Spectre11B 5 months ago
that one is gonna sting
derpotni3riots 5 months ago
Hmmm?? It is hard to argue the photos..I mean a picture is worth a thousand words!! Or was.....
yoh1954 5 months ago in playlist More videos from representativepress
For the best collection of evidence refuting the official conspiracy theory please watch all 4 (Sept 08-11) days of the "Toronto Hearings" on the events of September 11, 2001.
Expert Witnesses and guest speakers:
James Gourley, Lance deHaven-Smith, David Ray Griffin, Kevin Ryan, Jay Kolar, Paul Zarembka, Barbara Honegger, Richard Gage, Michel Chossudovsky, Cynthia McKinney, Graeme MacQueen, David Chandler, Jon Cole, Kevin Ryan, Niels Harrit, Peter Dale Scott, Laurie Manwell, Senator Mike Gravel.
manwello15 5 months ago
For the best collection of evidence refuting the official conspiracy theory please watch all 4 (Sept 08-11) days of the "Toronto Hearings" on the events of September 11, 2001.
Expert Witnesses and guest speakers:
James Gourley, Lance deHaven-Smith, David Ray Griffin, Kevin Ryan, Jay Kolar, Paul Zarembka, Barbara Honegger, Richard Gage, Michel Chossudovsky, Cynthia McKinney, Graeme MacQueen, David Chandler, Jon Cole, Kevin Ryan, Niels Harrit, Peter Dale Scott, Laurie Manwell, Senator Mike Gravel.
manwello15 5 months ago
Hey dipshit, I know you think that 9/11 wasnt an inside job and that truthers are retarded, and that it was our support for Israel pissed off the muslims, but did you ever stop and think that our govt did this is an excuse to go to war to fight Israel's enemies? You can have your cake and eat it too ya jackwagon. Our govt pulled of the 9/11 incident to go to war against Israel's enemies.
zepfan74 5 months ago
After D.B. Cooper hijacked a plane in 71, by 1973 all planes that fly off course, have a major passenger disturbance (captain has a button to push), set off an alarm at the take off control tower and the destination control tower. The tower controlers have the ability to remote control the planes if this happens. This didnt happen on 9/11.
Not to mention if planes fly more then two miles off course NORAD sends fighter jets to intercept them. This didnt happen either.
zepfan74 5 months ago
So the BBC in England are part of this huuuge conspiracy too? Haha, those "truthers" are truly crazy/retarded! By the way, I just saw that the guy who started "Loose Change" is no longer a "truther"! That's great, but I guess that truthers will be a problem for a long time still. : )
winterstellar 5 months ago
the 911 co-chair himself is saying a new investigation is needed, because he thinks theirs was intended to fail. why would the investigation be intended to fail if insiders are not guilty?
pointing fingers at people who just suck at making claims, theories, documentaries etc, that use the wrong words and distort, that are too fanatic, DOES NOT CHANGE the obvious reality: 911 investigation was covered, and its a safe assumption that someone covering a crime also had something to do with it.
wtfronsson 5 months ago
@wtfronsson Yes, there was pieces of evidence omitted, mainly the testimonies for the reasons for the attack.
Our foreign polices are too important to us and our clients to be jeopardised by being put under public scrutiny.
Though this is not a reason to suggest this was an 'inside job'
markmaxy125 5 months ago
@markmaxy125 You are yourself now omitting details. For instance the remains of U93 that are locked in Iron Mountain. All other crashed planes are seen in detail in the media, but not a glimpse of U93. That has nothing to do with foreign policy.
wtfronsson 5 months ago
Alex Jones is our only hope against the Illuminati. Except that actually he is working for them. Or so he thinks. That's what the reptoids want him to think. Or so the reptoids think. That's what the Thule society wants them to think. But actually the Thule society is controlled by a gerbil inside a brain inside a box inside a KFC INSIDE A STARBUCKS INSIDE A BOOKSTORE.
It's so trippy and cool.
DrakeDun 5 months ago
~ if damage down one side caused it to collapse, then the building would have buckled and fallen that direction ... that's physics ... according to live video, the building buckled at center top and fell in on itself ... into a nice pile within its own footprint ... very nice work too, gotta be a bummer for the pros who set it up, not being able to take credit for their artistry on those 3 buildings
jimamidon 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wo...... need to unsubscribe to these people : FFFrepresentativepress
talking s#$t about Burmas and Jones!
haskellfilmz 5 months ago
wo...... need to unsubscribe to these people : representativepress
talking s#$t about Burmas and Jones!
haskellfilmz 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 = inside job. Period
tseitz123 5 months ago
Experts and witnesses are bought and sold just like all of the other US slave professions. The defense pays for it's experts, the prosecution pays for it's witnesses, and vice versa. Who to believe? Who knows. Truth is too often stranger than fiction. Just because we're(conspiracy realists) paranoid doesn't mean someone isn't out to get us.
4Xderrick 5 months ago
3 steel framed building collapsing due to fire in one day. In the history of mankind... it's never happened before and it's never happened since. Never ever.
tradingbarracuda 5 months ago
@tradingbarracuda Irrelevant.
TheMercilessEye 5 months ago
Two things;
1) I spent the week of 9/11 looking for my youngest son. I found him on 9?15 alive. Thank God.
2) I grew up with the family who owned thebiggest demolition company in Connecticut. I don't know about ths photo expert. But I know the WTC-7 video is a controlled demolition. I believed the official story until January 4th, 2007 when I saw the video of WTC-7 coming down a) at free fall speed and 2) landing inside it's footprint.
tradingbarracuda 5 months ago
@tradingbarracuda What, then, do you maintain would have been the 'proper' way for Building 7 to fall, if it had suffered structural damage on one side, and had not been a controlled demolition?...since you're an 'expert' and all...having 'grown up with the family who owned the biggest demolition company in Connecticut.' (Impressive credentials) Description and examples, please, as your evidence.
TheMercilessEye 5 months ago
@TheMercilessEye How many buildings have you seen imploded in real life? Did you know that this building was heavily fortified - literally re-built when Solomon Brothers became the main tenent in 1988. They wanted a more open floor plan so the building was gutted and reinforced internally with an ADDITIONAL superstructure. Later the SEC, CIA, FBI-NY and the Mayors emergency management office became tenets. Several floors were additionally fortified to withstand fires and bombing.
tradingbarracuda 5 months ago
@tradingbarracuda I asked you answer a question and requested you to supply evidence. You've done neither. Congratulations on the piss-poor obfuscation.
TheMercilessEye 5 months ago
@TheMercilessEye It would have fallen into the damaged corner. It did not. Stop wasting my time. Go bang your head against a real skyscraper -- to test for certified steel and certified concrete. Then open your mind and go do the research. It's out there if you're willing to be wrong. I was stuck like you for 6 years believing the official story. Then I was willing to "see" truth. Controlled demolition makes far more sense than collapse due to fire.
tradingbarracuda 5 months ago
@tradingbarracuda I'm not the one wasting your time: you're doing a bang-up job of that all by yourself. As the claimant, the burden of proof is upon you, not me. "Controlled demolition makes far more sense than collapse due to fire" - submit your evidence supporting this. Answer the question and furnish your evidence, or be disregarded. Argument from authority is worthless.
TheMercilessEye 5 months ago
You are a braver man than me representantivepress. Keep up the great work. I get too emotional to argue with idiots on the internet. (the idiots being the brainwashed public in general, not the 9/11 truthers. I don't agree with the truthers and find them to be a distraction from the real political issues, but in they are better informed than 90% of the people out there regarding the rotting hypocrisy that is government propaganda)
freeshyne1234 5 months ago
@representativepress To be fair, when does Alex Jones ever not come off as an insensitive, arrogant, phoney, snake oil peddling, impervious to fact or reason blowhard? ;)
mw2000 5 months ago
@PureOfRS
When the port authority said "pull it" they meant the rescue operation. Pull it is not a controlled demolition term at all. Look it up and you can find it out for yourself. The port authority pulled the firefighters out because they felt it unsafe and also "it's going to collapse". It also suffered structural failure and did collapse.
RedneckR0nin 5 months ago
Don't worry I will make your tears go away and subscribe since all these troofers are leaving you. Go fucking figure that they don't want to hear something that conflicts with their point of view.....sounds familiar of a conspiracy theorist! I don't want to hear what your saying so I will just ignore you and insult you and that makes it all better!
RedneckR0nin 5 months ago
The only disappointing thing about this video is that you're still entertaining and interacting with these conspiracy whack-jobs. I know it's infuriating that some people only seem capable of listening to Alex "everyone but me is a gatekeeper" Jones rather than reading, say, Chomsky but it's been 10 years, I'm not sure these idiots can be persuaded otherwise.
newcwriter 5 months ago
Don't let all these fools comments get you down. Keep spreading the truth.
ArchNME 5 months ago 27
@ArchNME "Keep spreading the truth."
The issue isn't what one should do with the truth, the issue is how one identifies it.
How do you decide what is true? Are you able to describe the process? If you are not, what do you think that says about the reliability of the process?
If you don't think about thinking, are you really thinking at all?
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor I have identified the statements in this video as "the truth". I've done all the neccessary thinking to come to that conclusion. Perhaps if you can specifically tell me where you have gotten lost along the way I can help you out.
ArchNME 5 months ago
Comment removed
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor First of all, fuck you. Secondly, your "question" comes off as rhetorical nonsense. I can answer it easy enough though.
Q: "How do you decide what is true?"
A: Logic and evidence.
So that's the end of that little game.
Now, if you have some specific objection the my interpretation of truth that you would like to discuss the reasoning behind please raise it and I'll be happy to educate you Otherwise, STFU.
ArchNME 5 months ago
@ArchNME " Logic and evidence."
That's fine then. I apologise.
I've obviously mistaken you. Please try not to get upset.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
honestly i thought this would be a video posting truths not lies...you just lost yourself another subscriber
Gangstabob716 5 months ago
disappointed!! an intelligent person like you would believe these government lies. Sorry mate..gotta unsub now..!!! Lost your credibility their mate!!!
bulbulahamadnz 5 months ago
its not physically possible to knock down a reinforced building from the top you have to aim for the roots for it to fall down
theres no reasonable explanation other than that
now it might be an inside job or not i dont give a shit i just know this building roots was destroyed causing it to fall down
SuperxSharpxShooter 5 months ago
@SuperxSharpxShooter this is not true. I've seen analysis from a mechanical engineer showing that the impulse from the weight of the top floors would easily crash through the floor beneath it... and on it went.
gbell12 5 months ago
@gbell12 The building was carrying that "weight" for years unless godzilla landed on it, now that would be "weight" strong enough to make it go down
and if what you say is true then due to the massive size and height of that building wouldn't be reasonable that it would fall down sideways rather then straight down this proves that the building roots was damaged intentionally.
SuperxSharpxShooter 5 months ago
unsubscribed
untouchableali 5 months ago
I have my own conspiracy theory which is that corporate agents, e.g. Fox News, are deliberately promulgating conspiracy theories to keep the "Great Uneducated" so busy chasing their own tails they won't notice their increasing economic and political marginalisation.
colourmegone 5 months ago in playlist 911 Charlatans
@colourmegone
you may be onto something there:) while all these pricks are busy chasing their tails, no one is addressing us foreign policy on israel :)
TimothyTwoofer 5 months ago
@TimothyTwoofer That is exactly right....no one is addressing foreign policy of the United States or how it got to this point! Better yet how this can all be avoided in the future!
RedneckR0nin 5 months ago
In order to buy Alex Jones BS you have to assume that every scientist and professional in the world who actually is expert on these matters is part of a conspiracy. That means it's unanimous - they are all lying.
You couldn't get that many people to play patty cake unanimously.
Only looney toons talk this nonsense.
Ansonidak 5 months ago
Alex and company are great the only TRUTH!!! great video
SRVjediknight 5 months ago
Saying all these buildings fell at free fall is ridiculous. You need nothing underneath to free fall. They fell to their foundations which is what "ground zero" stands for.
The911Shaman 5 months ago
The elevators collapsed causing massive sounds like explosions. Plus, the building was crumbling!
The911Shaman 5 months ago
Alex is a businessman. He doesn't give a shit what dorks like Bermas think about 911 as long as he can sell enough water purifiers.
hodenriss 5 months ago
@hodenriss
and caps badges, tee shirts sun screens for ur car to name but a few items,basically anything big enough to print 911 was an inside job onto :)
TimothyTwoofer 5 months ago
Truther deny the damage of building 7 because they only show their followers one side of the picture. They never show you the back of building 7 which was sheared off from the damage. Look behind building 7 and you will see how damaged it really was.
Truthers a re ignorant fools and willing tools for Muslim extremism.
The911Shaman 5 months ago
@The911Shaman
No, they are rather tools for big business - so are "Muslim extremism" and "the Zionists". Everything else you said I agree with.
RSFO 5 months ago
Why are you people insistent on believing these crazy conspiracies that waste hours of your time when you can research things worth while like Tom does.
elitewarrior11 5 months ago
I find it interesting that while you try to (unsuccessfully) debunk the WTC7 falling into it's own footprint, you don't attempt to do the same with both towers. Also, I have never seen a video from you discussing Flight 93 where there is absolutely no evidence of a plane even crashing in that field or the fact that you have never actually seen a plane strike the Pentagon. You seemed explicity focused on WTC7 and NYC. Can I ask why that is?
BlacksAreBeautiful 5 months ago
Comment removed
MyceliaProductions42 5 months ago
@MyceliaProductions42 stable? might have to beg to differ.
1adadada 5 months ago
We know that WTC7 fell. Why ? Damage. Impact from planes ? No. The 2 towers fell down, straight down, by means of gravity, and lack of resistance. So one could argue that the impacts spread fuel and oxygen to generate that fire & heat. WTC7, was it fire ? or demolition ? or both ? Buildings have sprinkler systems and fire also takes fuel & oxygen. If fire, something kept it stoked really well. I've seen fire departments train on old houses like that.
tenagliac 5 months ago
My BS detector is advising me to abort/unsubscribe. See ya!!!
CampQwitchaBitchin 5 months ago
look, the BOTTOM line is that the official story is a fucking lie. Who benefits? That's all you need to ask. If 9-11 was not an inside job, I'm a cow.
tseitz123 5 months ago 5
@tseitz123 'Who benefits? That's all you need to ask" actually no, that is not how the world works. Just becaus someone enifits doesn't mean they DID it.
representativepress 5 months ago 11
@representativepress keep your head in the sand. It really helps.
tseitz123 5 months ago
@representativepress Hey, Appreciate your videos, always informative. Permit me to go off-topic, but what was the name of that final music piece in the end of the video? It's driving me crazy on where I've heard it before. Thanx.
USAFSmiley87 5 months ago in playlist More videos from representativepress
@representativepress No, actually he does make a point. Larry Silverstein took out an insurance policy one specifically from terrorist attacks. Fine maybe that is normal for government buildings. But also they're were a lot of important documents there. Especially in WTC 7 about the ENRON scandal. Not only that but the government has a horrible track record I'm sure you know this all too well. I'm on the fence about this one.
Brusier47 5 months ago
@representativepress but it makes it pretty reasonable. If a crime is at court and they dont have suspects, what question are they asking ? They asking who would benevit from that crime. As trust un the truthfull words of gouvernment representatives is well shrinking day by day, we do not fully believe in the official version. gouvernments proof their affinity to profane lies and public stultification. so dont be wondering about ppl searching the truth.
medoh1 5 months ago
@tseitz123
i found a big nail in my tyre this morning, obviously the guy from the tyre shop round the corner is going round in the middle of the night placing nails under tyres, i mean just look at who benefits.
sigh,
also i was burgled last year, i go a nice insurance settlement, so obviously i burgled my own house by your fucking warped sense of critical thought
TimothyTwoofer 5 months ago
@TimothyTwoofer LMAO! That is pretty funny actually! Totally true too....I guess you are a reveler of truth when it comes to the tire conspiracy in your town....oh yeah and a thief....can't forget your a thief too!
RedneckR0nin 5 months ago
@tseitz123 Can you mooooo for me then please?
RedneckR0nin 5 months ago
@tseitz123 The fundamentalist Moslems also benefited, I believe, with a concerted 'revenge shot' against the USA's support for Israeli oppression of the Palestinians. Is this all you've got?
TheMercilessEye 5 months ago
@tseitz123 Your a cow!!!
Johnnyeod33 5 months ago
@tseitz123
A stupid cow too!
LindaStevensBZ 5 months ago
@tseitz123
Moo
debunkerman 5 months ago
@tseitz123 AGREED!
rokarolla 5 months ago
To believe this exterior damage was enough to cause a catastrophic failure of the "entire" center core (concrete reinforced steel core), which even basic construction laymen know hold high rises up... is naive!
Buildings topple over and/or break into sections from these forms of damage, they do not collapse in on themselves, impossible, or we are in big trouble if our architects and engineers are designing and building shit this weak!
Man there is still a big campaign of lies going on, amazing!
ISENTRY 5 months ago
@ISENTRY For an explanation of the collapse please read this article in its entirety BEFORE replying, "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation" Eagar and Musso pub in JOM the journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, available free online, just copy the title into a search engine.
Quote, "To summarize all of these points, a 500,000 t(on) structure has too much inertia to fall in any direction other than nearly straight down. "
colourmegone 5 months ago
@ISENTRY You see this is why I question these so called reports, it states in this article that a 767 carry 90,000 L gallons, when on that morning flight 11 was only carrying approximately 10,000 US gallons- 8,300 IMP gallons, it is these kinds of reports that exaggerate and distort the truth! So if they are wrong about what the planes carried in fuel (Big Time) what else are they twisting in this articles?
Wikipedia; flight 11 : wikipedia._Airlines_Flight_11 ( crash )
ISENTRY 5 months ago
@ISENTRY And yes L gallons is litres, but 10,000 US gallons turns about to be less then 40,000 US gallons, why would this report say that a 767 carries 90,000 L gallons of fuel, sorry that is deception!
ISENTRY 5 months ago
@ISENTRY Flight 175 was carrying also 10,000 US gallons of fuel that morning, Not 90,000 L gallons as the report also says!
wikipedia/_Flight_175. also that when liquids impact something at those speeds the majority of the liquid VAPORIZES into those large balls of fire that the world saw! It is impossible in my science that 10,000 US gallons of fuel stopped and came to rest in pools while everything else disintegrated!
ISENTRY 5 months ago
@ISENTRY he is not naive, just disinfo
banjorol 5 months ago
If it wasnt for alex jones the worlds supply of snake oil would evaporate
YamaKazoo 5 months ago
If you believe that this virtually superficial damage to the structure would cause it to collapse at free fall speed, with no resistance, into its own footprint with not much more than a pile of dust remaining..........................YOU ARE DUMBER THAN A ROCK THAN A LEARNING DISORDER!!!
2 Peter 3:5 "For this they willingly are ignorant............"
CampQwitchaBitchin 5 months ago
@CampQwitchaBitchin he is disinfo
banjorol 5 months ago
why did you post this shit video? OMG! they have new photographs! yeah right! after what? 10 yrs? I could pretty much photo shop a fucking picture of the pentagon being hit by a UFO and make it believable in less than 2 months! now, why didn't they show this pics right away? what happened man? MIB's got to u and sold out or what? you got scared? r u pulling a Charlie V? or what? it's ok you were meant to change nothing anyway! mind as well shut down your channel & stop wasting our time.
EztliAztecatl 5 months ago
Good Video. the criticism you recieve is typically irrational, close minded, and biased. Alex Jones is full of shit I stopped listening to him a while ago.
Zachdudeio2 5 months ago
Bermas can't debate, can't see and or can't tell the truth. These are the same people who denied that there was any evidence that flight 93 crashed despite the fact that most of the plane was recovered. There is at least one other photo of building 7 which shows the extent of the damage in more clear light. It is not hard to see how debris from one of the other towers could have damaged 7 enough and spread fire intense enough to bring it down after the SEVERAL HOURS it took to fall.
NoEoAoRo 5 months ago
@NoEoAoRo
Its not that building 7 couldn't have fallen by the damage it is the way it has fallen that is suspicious the damage was located in specific points in the building. If these points were weak enough to collapse the building would not collapse in a vertical way like it did it would collapse in the parts where it was weakened and fall sideways. This collapse was textbook demolition.
colloredbrothers 5 months ago
Bermas can't debate, can't see and or can't tell the truth. These are the same people who denied that there was any evidence flight 93 despite the fact that most of the plane was recovered. There is at least one other photo of building 7 which shows the extent of the damage in more clear light. It is not hard to see how debris from one of the other towers could have damaged 7 enough and spread fire intense enough to bring it down after the SEVERAL HOURS it took to fall.
NoEoAoRo 5 months ago
unsubscribe !
medarknexs 5 months ago 2
@medarknexs Troofers, you are the useful idiots of the masters of mankind.
RSFO 5 months ago
In the hours if not days if AJ talking about 9/11 in the last 10 years this is the best you could do?
Thousands of engineers and architects have come out to say the fall was suspect. So you found a new angle pic showing a gash...OK?
This clip proves literally...nothing.
BarringtonDailey 5 months ago
JUST LOOK at the both towers when they collapse. the top collapses on an angle first, then goes down. if this weight was enough to instantly overpower the floors directly under it as explain in the 9/11 report, why didnt the top continue on the same path as its momentum and fall to the side of the building.
forby24 5 months ago
saw a video of building 7 lastnight, and the fires were much more extensive then just a few rooms here and there, with that being said no building ever in the history of steel framed structures has ever collasped from fire. there was plenty of damage also but it surley would not have caused it to fall into its own foot print
513coneyslinger 5 months ago
Supporting Israel?!?! Now I KNOW you can't read. Fuck Israel, FUCK Zionists, and seriously......learn how to read.
potp5150 5 months ago
this is redicules you guys are from now on are on the side of the elite bastards.Ive followed you guys for a very long time and now im putting you guys into the relm of trolls.When you side with the elite murderers and you know you are i wont be a part of your low life conduct,As far as im concerned your no better then those cut throats
surfjerr 5 months ago
@surfjerr do you even know what your saying? You guys? Your not speaking to a private group that all has meetings together. Your speaking to a VIRTUAL GROUP/UNION that your picturing exits as a REAL PRIVATE collecitive interacting secret UNION. You can pull yourself to reality NOW, but you have to turn the choice around.
derpotni3riots 5 months ago
Right, this whole debate has taken a left turn. The fact is that building 7 needed to fall down regardless of how it fell. Too many powerful people had vested interest in it's collapse. Whether it was demolished or not is beside the point that all the gold was moved from it and that it was a convenient way to destroy thousands of incriminating files. I ask myself, what is the point of this video? And I answer, to curb the debate into meaninglessness.
aghoranathi 5 months ago
@aghoranathi bingo on the left turn. not true on the meaningless. Unless you make it true. Make it a awareness that to get to the truth YOU must believe FALSE REALITYs first before you ALTER them into the truth later. This does not make one stupid, it makes us all in a termperary state of ever changing ignorance. This video may curb the debate away from the critical truths, however it curbs it where its already has been curbed and helps STOP that curb. That helps more than most believe.
derpotni3riots 5 months ago
this proves it ! if this would have collapsed because of this damage the building would have fallen OVER not straight DOWN
th86stone 5 months ago in playlist More videos from representativepress
@th86stone
representativepress likes to hide behind junk-science
that why you have to corner him on:
the Israeli Mossad who were arrested near the George Washington Bridge with a truck full of explosives
the "Dancing Israelis" who were there to "document the event"
the Israelis who drove around in a truck with a 9/11 mural on it (yes they actually did)
& the Israeli Art Students
TheFlexEffect 5 months ago
I laugh at humanity while reading these comments. All of you believing in the 9/11 delusion are completely mislead. I mean, you all claim the government is fooling everyone and trying to mislead everyone from the truth. So what, Alex Jones and other assholes like him don't do the same thing? I just love how these morons are treated like freedom fighters when they even are feeding the fuel of lies continuously.
May God help you all, because you guys really need it.
AngryIntellectual 5 months ago
@AngryIntellectual "I laugh at humanity" LoL how is one able to do that? Humanity is an abstract, how is one able to hold or grasp it as a whole? Now if you laugh at truthers, then it makes sense. That made ME laugh.
warrkrymez 5 months ago