Added: 4 years ago
From: jimsixjams
Views: 232,529
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (87)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 50 gallons pet mile

  • Just imagine the heat generated by this kind of thing! Good luck for the cooling!

  • i build it in MC

  • lol

    

  • It looks like 7 inline-6's connected together. Cool.

  • Looks like an animation of the pistons for a Wright 42 cylinder Tornado A/C engine. Run on test stands but never flown to my knowledge.

  • @mpetersen6 I bet, that thing must weigh a ton...or two.

  • no shit ??!!

  • Imagine what that would sound like :D

  • @falaqdad15 lol ask the nazis...when we flew overhead XD

  • @whazzup3nine29

    hahaha

  • Everyone is thinking way too big, I want to use this to run a pencil sharpener.

  • could i put this in my lawnmower?

  • i will know how much rmp it does :D

  • fuck! i am not gonna travel by plane again.

    scary engine...

  • There are actually 42 pistons.

  • Th.. that.... That actually works??? .... D: i should run that on my bmx bike....

  • Why cant you people count? There are 36 pistons.

  • looks like a Wright R-2160. 7 banks of 6 cylinders each. And unlike most radials, the cylinders actually were inline because it was liquid cooled, with each bank being enclosed in a water jacket.

  • thats what drives my brain

  • Didnt they call this type of radial engine the corn cob?

  • Imagine having to overhaul this engine! 

  • 42 cylinders?

    I'd hate to be the poor s.o.b that has to change plugs or worse, rings.

  • @Warblade118 28 cylinders... 56 plugs.. easy to foul all in a flash

  • Imagine haveing to replace the piston rings!

  • kick the tyres and light the fires big daddy

  • One thing:

    In engines of that type (few radial engines combined on one axis) cylinders are not arranged in rows like here.

    The follow a curve, so all cylinders can be cooled evenly, by airflow, which is very idea of radial engine design in opposition to in-line or V designes.

  • With this I shall build the world's most powerful merry-go-round.

  • 30 cylinders. Sweet. I'd like to squeeze that under the hood of my jeep. I wouldn't need a transmission, just a throttle, clutch, and the right differential.

  • @gblpst81

    Its too bad rotary engines have little torque compared to the one in your car.

    You'll have a helluva time trying to get out of your driveway.

  • @lastingpain22 This isn't a rotary engine. Mazda RX-7's and RX-8's have rotary engines. They're based on the original Wankel rotary engine design. This is a radial engine and it has plenty of torque. It's essentially 5 straight-six engines all sharing the same crankshaft. The Wright R-3350, for example, has just 18 cylinders and a power-to-weight ratio that's about 2.4 times better than the 4.0L Jeep engine, and that's a Jeep engine with some good torque. 30 cylinders in a Jeep would be great.

  • ...wait...now that's just way too many pistons.....is that even for real?

  • @amartinjoe yep it has pistons on all differnt angles so the plains can spin and the engine wont stall...

  • @amartinjoe

    Yes it is.

    This is what is called a radial engine, and its the sort of engine that was used in some propeller planes in the past.

    This configuration would probably only fit in a very large craft, like a large scale bomber.

    The Pratt & Whitney R-2800 engine is probably the most famous of radial engines.

    It was the engine equipped by the F6F Hellcat, the P-47 Thunderbolt, the F4U Corsair, among many others.

    It had 18 cylinders arranged in two rows, and developed over 2500hp.

  • Jets are way better lol

  • looks like a gang bang of pistons

  • бред..

  • people there really are water cooled radials like this.. good examples are Dragonfire (42 cyl) and the Lycoming r-7750 (36 cyl)

  • could you repeat that, in english this time?

  • Look at Pratt & whitney Wasp Major R-4360, a 35 cylinders radial engine diplayed in 4 rows of 7 in a spiral configuration (for better cooling)... around 4.600hp per unit.

    Howard Hughes's Hercules used 8 of these.

    XD

  • 4 rows of 7 cylinders = 35?!

    Where did you go to school...? XD

  • 4x7=28, learn to maths.

    The early versions of the R4360 were only 3,000 HP, which is what the Hughes H-4 Hercules used.

    The last -51VDT engine produced 4,300 HP, but it was disliked by ground crews due to being maintenance intensive and only having a MTBO of 600 hours, compared to the R3350 with a 5000 HR MTBO and a similar power of between 2,500 and 3,800HP.

  • Imagine how hard it would be to cool that son of a bitch!

  • holy shit!! how many cylinders is it?

  • this particular one had 30

  • 42 cylinders

  • Big blob of moving cylinders lol.

    do they ever use straights or inlines in aircrafts instead of radials?

  • yes they do use inline engines, the spitfire, mustang, bf109 messerschmitt, the fw190D9, and even the lancaster bomber used some sort of v12 engines, and the albatros had a inline 6, and the wright flyer had a straight 4. some aircraft like the sopwith camel, and the dr fokker had rotary piston engines. and some have boxer engines too.

  • Comment removed

  • dude

    how many fucking cylinders do you want

    complete impossible

  • hhahahaaa right

  • actually this isnt impossble, a radial engine was made with 5 rows of nine cylinders, it ran and created 5,000hp.

  • Comment removed

  • what a waste of metal.................

  • what program did you make that in?

  • use a calculator :-D

  • Wohoooooooo...........

    Nice.

  • how many pistons ?

  • well there are 6 rows of 7 cylinders wich equals up to 47 cylinders. and thats alot....

  • 6 rows of 7 cylinders

    how 47 ?

  • sorry i ment 42 cylinders.

  • it's a radial engine

  • Is there any Wasp major models?

  • wasp major was 3 rows of 9 cylinders.

  • Wasp Major was four rows of seven cylinders.

  • holy crap your right

  • If you start one of these wrong and foul the plugs, it takes hours to fix. So get it right the first time, please.

  • WTF imagine setting the timing on this beast...

  • @xerox12345 just like any other engine set it off cyl. #1 TDC all others will follow

  • @xerox12345 No thanks .. :D

  • @xerox12345 some quit some turned to drugs and alcohol

  • i always wonder what gets the ignitions to spot the right time

  • Multi-row radial engines were the epitome of internal combustion technology for airplanes. Jets came next, and killed these.

  • Mainly because somehow jet engines are more fuel efficient..

  • depending on the size of the aircraft.

  • Moteur radial.... increvable... certain avaient jusqu'à 3000 chevaux. Comme ceux du B29

  • 42 pistons

  • yay, i'm putting one in my car.... lol

    imagine how powerful this would be had it been diesel or something.. lol

  • that would be a 36 cylinder engine. talk about incredible horsepower

  • that's way overkill

  • damm thats alot of power

  • WTF HOW MANY PISTONS IS THAT??!!? (V38 lol)

  • it cant be a V if its a radial... er i dunno what it is, but its not a V

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more