Yep a hologram. Be aware the source need not be in duality. FYI a hologram can be produced (imaged) from within another object = appears in an object. Look for other mistakes - they made a number of them. I'm surprised they got with it for as long as they have - but I suppose if they've got control of the media.....
We've been lied!!!!! It is a real proof that this plane was an hologram! As he is supposed to crash into the tower, we can see no crash, no fire, no explosion except a little smoke!!! Incredible! Thank you for spreading the Truth my friend
@torpedo999787887 - the question is, How come it exploded in side the building instead of where the wings impacted the building... considering that the wings is where the fuel is stored?
@mezpezlez You weren't there, so you are not qualified to make such a determination. In reality, witnesses at the scene testify that there was no commercial jetliner anywhere near the buildings, and there was no jetliner sound either.
Excuse me, but to my knowlegde, a "hologram" can only appear out of one angle. Are you saying, that this was a 3D hologram that could be viewed from all directions??
No, please point out to me where you imagine I said that, so that I can set you straight on the facts.
Even if it can only "appear out of one angle," which is your personal belief with no evidence, that would only support the fact that the reason why the left wing disappears into thin air before impact is that it is indeed a hologram.
As I said in the description, the smoke blocked the projector, which is the only logical explanation for the disappearance of an entire plane wing.
Sorry if this wasn't clear from the description, but the initial explosions were caused by US military missiles (disguised by the hologram that appears in the video), and the main destruction was caused by incendiary devices placed strategically to melt the steel beams that supported the buildings.
Jet fuel burns at a temperature that is MUCH, MUCH lower than the melting point of steel, so it could not have been jet fuel that melted the support beams.
@34turboV6 Yeah we can, their lives were sacrificed to Bush's fake wars to keep the military industrial complex going. Its tragic that they killed our first responders. That doesn't change the fact 9/11 was "faked" o tv that morning then the buildings were demolished. Larry Silverstein had an asbestos problem and we had a war problem. It was a marriage made in hell.
You are a complete and utter moron.
AMolvar 1 year ago
Yep a hologram. Be aware the source need not be in duality. FYI a hologram can be produced (imaged) from within another object = appears in an object. Look for other mistakes - they made a number of them. I'm surprised they got with it for as long as they have - but I suppose if they've got control of the media.....
Sloppyff 1 year ago
We've been lied!!!!! It is a real proof that this plane was an hologram! As he is supposed to crash into the tower, we can see no crash, no fire, no explosion except a little smoke!!! Incredible! Thank you for spreading the Truth my friend
mreinstein48 1 year ago 11
Just a question. A simple question. How an hollow aluminum tube can penetrate a steel thick as tank's armor???
torpedo999787887 1 year ago 31
@torpedo999787887 Beats me!
AMolvar 1 year ago 17
@AMolvar Man! i AM CONVINCED! thank yoU FOR THIS VIDEO, MAN!
MrDuffy81 1 year ago
@torpedo999787887 - the question is, How come it exploded in side the building instead of where the wings impacted the building... considering that the wings is where the fuel is stored?
yallways 1 year ago 13
Yep...missile with holographic plane surrounding it.
StarveTheSystem 1 year ago 10
Wow i always wondered this
Great video thank you
refused 1 year ago 7
great video, very impressed.
keep up the good work in getting the truth out
buffboynick 1 year ago 14
@AMolvar
and how was it playing at the scene in real life?
mezpezlez 1 year ago
@mezpezlez You weren't there, so you are not qualified to make such a determination. In reality, witnesses at the scene testify that there was no commercial jetliner anywhere near the buildings, and there was no jetliner sound either.
AMolvar 1 year ago 9
@mezpezlez
In Real Life witnesses said they saw a missile and did not heard an airplane!
Only the 7 major media director said it was an airplane.. and they where at the local destruction place just 1 minute after the explosion!
Anyway most of the crow is fake as the airplane around the sky.. watch this:
/watch?v=19YxBELhORQ
and my other video to understand what is going on..
ThePoster100 1 year ago 5
Excuse me, but to my knowlegde, a "hologram" can only appear out of one angle. Are you saying, that this was a 3D hologram that could be viewed from all directions??
Thetan1974 1 year ago
No, please point out to me where you imagine I said that, so that I can set you straight on the facts.
Even if it can only "appear out of one angle," which is your personal belief with no evidence, that would only support the fact that the reason why the left wing disappears into thin air before impact is that it is indeed a hologram.
As I said in the description, the smoke blocked the projector, which is the only logical explanation for the disappearance of an entire plane wing.
AMolvar 1 year ago 16
a "Hologram"?....hhhmmm what this shows is more likely C G I ,insersion
but for sure
no airliner hit any building on 9-11-2001
BaNoyes 1 year ago 10
i believe it....i NEVER believed this was real from the 2nd it happened....the sad thing is...they (the GOV) got away with this....
Thikkness 1 year ago 36
and what about the noise ?
We all hear a plane !
Perseane 1 year ago
@Perseane The noise that you hear is computer-generated.
AMolvar 1 year ago 17
@AMolvar Never mind i believe You now, i seen the plane from another angle and it sure does not look like a passenger plane.
34turboV6 1 year ago 13
Obvious question - What about the peolpe that died and the families that lost their loved ones, Can you and your scientists explain that?
34turboV6 1 year ago
@34turboV6 Yes.
Sorry if this wasn't clear from the description, but the initial explosions were caused by US military missiles (disguised by the hologram that appears in the video), and the main destruction was caused by incendiary devices placed strategically to melt the steel beams that supported the buildings.
Jet fuel burns at a temperature that is MUCH, MUCH lower than the melting point of steel, so it could not have been jet fuel that melted the support beams.
Thanks for asking!
AMolvar 1 year ago 26
@34turboV6 Yeah we can, their lives were sacrificed to Bush's fake wars to keep the military industrial complex going. Its tragic that they killed our first responders. That doesn't change the fact 9/11 was "faked" o tv that morning then the buildings were demolished. Larry Silverstein had an asbestos problem and we had a war problem. It was a marriage made in hell.
Cranevideo 1 year ago 12