This is funny. I'm just imagining a parent finding their 6-year-old child with this book instead of one of the zounds of Christian books for little kids. That parent would freak.. out..
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
I had a copy of the book once--a copy that had been given me by the famous author; it was stolen from me by another atheist. American Atheists Inc could still publish the book if it wanted to. The current leaders of AA want to play down the memory of the author in the minds of the people to gain the spotlight for themselves.
Freedom of speech.Even for the ones who deny the Creator.God Almighty.Your chioce.If you believe in Jesus,you're saved.If you don't believe,you're damned.
Given how many ridiculous contradiction there are in the bible and the severe lack of evidence I'll easily take my chances not hanging out with you freaks in case of your highly unlikely ancient imagined stories.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
I HAVE GIVEN OVER A DOZEN LECTURES defending scientific creationism before evolutionist science faculty and students at colleges. At the end, I would open up for questions, comments, rebuttals. The science faculty, for the most part, was silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true. Some in the science faculty offered tricky rebuttals and I successfully answered them. It's those who don't know enough science that I've found the most challenging to convince.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or a cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. Even for every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing harm and even extinction, not upward evolution. Genetic similarities are better explained due to a common design for common purposes.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
NO REAL VIOLATION OF CHURCH/STATE SEPARATION in teaching both evolution and Intelligent Design because no one is being forced to believe in God's existence or any religion. Taxpayers on the both sides of the issue pay for public education. It is only fair that scientific arguments and evidence of both sides be presented, at the very least in public school textbooks. The issue is important because it affects people's lives, their values, philosophy, and worldview.
ATHEISTS ARE MORE EDUCATED is a red herring argument. What about all the educated that aren't atheists? Many times, the minority has been right in history. The atheists and evolutionists control the education system and certain arguments and evidences aren't presented or known, even among the educated. There are strong personal motives involved on the issue of origins. That is why it is important to present arguments and evidences of both sides to the public.
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Here's the real version: God created Satan. Satan wanted to be God and rebelled, and was cast out of heaven. Satan wanted revenge. He created many false gods on earth and lead men away from God's love. Jesus came and died on the cross to save our sins. We now have a choice: follow God and accept His love, or follow sin/selves/idols and go to Hell.
@PerishedPyramid But according to that, it's really just the word of "false God's" ect. against the word of God. How can you know which one is the truth?
@smp2gbl See, when you use the word, "god," that means a lot of things to me. I can only imagine what it means to you. If you mean the god of the christian bible, then I'm afraid that definition is extremely self-limiting to me. And for you to claim to personally know god? To know god is to fully comprehend the laws of physics on a cosmic and quantum level. But I can easily tell you what god is NOT. God is not a silly entity, sitting on a cloud, making a list of who's naughty and nice.
@smp2gbl This was shot in 1994. He's past forty today and works in social services, taking care of the elderly and has a Master's degree in education and music. You WISH he was a "bully gone dumb" because it would help you rationalize all the flaws in your belief system. He is a spiritualist, by the way, who believes in the soul and the cycle of life, death and rebirth. God is impersonal - a pervasive force and intelligence that transcends reality.
I'm so relieved to see someone that sees what a spiritualist is. however when he shot this I do think he was misguided as well. A bully is still a bully, I was raised Lutheran but I do not believe in a mass religion god, just an idea of something with a plan just something we don't see. It is not stupid to believe in a god only a god that as been disproved to exist, an imagination is a wonderful thing not something to be made fun of.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
WHAT ABOUT THE STARS? Gravity explains how the order found in the precise courses of trillions of stars is maintained, but gravity can't explain the origin of that order! Did all the trillions stars agree to get out of each others way? C'mon! Disorder in the universe is because of chance, but the order is because of design. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read article by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation site.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpret
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from variations produced having survival value. It doesn't produce variations. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
WHY THE INTELLIGENT DESIGN DEBATE? If you discovered a sand castle on a lonely beach, you can't prove it was made by either chance or design. No one observed its origins. Either it was designed or the random forces of wind and waves made the castle. You didn't find fingerprints. Did the wind wipe the fingerprints away? How do we know that there were fingerprints in the first place? By chance or by design? Both sides should present their case. Read the article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of transitional forms and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
NOT ALL EVOLUTIONISTS even agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution. The bones are incomplete. There's no certainty of the bones belonging to the same creature. They can reconstruct whatever they want from these bones, and they have. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read my article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
very well done thanks for posting.and yes it put a smile on my face.the way u put it is so that everybody sees it how stupid it is.to believe that gods even wanna listen to us.i still dont get it that some people believe that if someone heals its god.if somebody starves its god.or its always the devil.but one of these two.unbelievable.bb
@Adamillionaire123 Holy shit, I can understand why you're so mad. Your shitty music vids are just as lame as the music in this vid, they're the same cra[. Well, except in this vid they actually try to use vocals, whereas you breath in a mike like the skinny little ho you are. Then you go torture people on YT by uploading it, thinking some record company is going to throw you a bone for creating a shitty track.
Oh yeah, a response for the pagan comment, err let's see... suck my dick. Solved.
This video bashes religion so badly I feel sorry for theists. Even more so because no creationist argument has ever been able to bash the theory of evolution.
u must be so dumb that u put blondes to shame ! lol really ? even kids think ur dumb ..idiot..to deny Gods existence is to deny ur existence ..all philosophical scriptures have said God is with the human body ....that God is the cause of consciousnesses it is known as athman .......it is God ...the world is but an illusion ..if it is then there must be some real basis for it ..that is Brahman or God
@vishnubhakthi I understand. But the "maya" or illusion we call our world is a thing that we created, as are the MASKS that we have created to describe Brahma, Vishnu, Kali, Krishna, Ganesha, etc., etc. In truth, God transcends all these forms.
@RevJohn :no..i am sorry i disagree .. it teaches something ..in Sanathan Dharm we have these stories called puranas ..they are illustration on how to live spiritually ....how to increase will power .and many good values are taught through stories called puranas ..but imagine if the puranas were not real events ..then one can just reject all values taught by them saying everything is imagination ! then no one would have any respect or values in society ....did you get my point ?
I just want to say serving GOD is a priviledge and in no way does it make us superior to non believers. I personally have NEVER felt more at peace then I do now knowing that I am doing as GOD commanded. If I am wrong and there is no Heaven or hell........no biggy. If I am right though...Well, Lets just say I like those odds alot more than if I believed otherwise: ) I urge you to get right with GOD before it's too late.
You can't force a non-Muslim to convert to Islam. This is reflected in Islamic Jurisprudence. Muslims remained a small minority in the Rashidun, Umayyad and early 'Abbasid Caliphates. Do you know why? Because the Qur'an says that you can't force people to convert to Islam, and this has became an orthodox doctrine in Islam. Mass conversions to Islam only occurred under the 'Abbasids - people converted for financial benefits.
atheists and satanists are two different groups you ignoramus!
atheists believe in things they can see, not a big bad demon in some fiery place. they are not religious.
read about the lucifer experiment and you will see that all modern religions are bullshit. including satanism, paganism, and whateverthehellyoucallreligionism.
@RisingAboveMyself religion is the biggest infection the world has ever seen. Just look how you wish pain and torture for someone just because they dont believe the same thing as you. thats some fucked up egotistical shit right there.
@RisingAboveMyself Is that God who is making them die horrific tragic deaths...just like when God gives little kids lukemia and they die horrific tragic deaths. God should only make atheists and satanists die horrific tragic deaths...I don't like when he kills innocent children that way. I wonder if we just pray for him to kill more atheists and less children it might come true right?
@RisingAboveMyself You are talking about one or two public figures, one of them a murderer who was given the death penalty, I believe. Other than that, you're statement holds absolutely no water. I could begin right now and list twenty Christians, right off the top of my head, who died terrible, tragic, horrific, deaths. With a little research, I could name hundreds more.
this is not for kids. dress up in a clown suit and try explain that God is a metaphore for believing in yourself. "Dear God..." is another way of say "Note to self..." or "Dear collective consciousness, please note..." dressed up as a smug druid adressing adults as if they were children may not be te most effective strategy. However, I am on board with you, Holmes. Keep up the good work. (:
@monsieurmike would that be John Holmes--or Santana Holmes? Cuz, otherwise, you might have meant "Home's"--as in HomeBoy...which is probably what you were attempting to convey...[unrecognizable words can be explored at dictionary com]
Atheists aren't satanists. Satanists are Satanists. Atheists are Atheists. You stunned fuck. Do you have any idea of the origins and meaning of the word Atheist or Theist? A theist is someone who believes in a god or gods. The "A" is in reference to a lack of the former. Like someone who enjoys sex and related practices is called "sexual" but someone who has no desire for such is called "Asexual". So "Atheist" is without your ridiculous belief in any God, wether it be Satan or God.
what i always wondered is why is religion not natural it has to be taught after all why would it need to be taught if was true it would not need to be something learned it would be as natural as walking.
@badpanda84 the whole point is that people would know there is God since he created all and knows all hy would he want it not known,and there would only be one religion because knowing there is a God people would know who he was and his wishes,that is what i mean by learned,
@badpanda84 "calculus" is not "true" or natural. It's a man made system. We can some up with some other concept like calculus, but we chose the one that works best. Don't be stupid.
@badpanda84 Germs are examinable and it's a fact. God is a concept. It's abstract. It has absolutely no effect on the real world. Therefore religions are useless, because the "God" ideas that religions are based on are infact imaginary. Tell me ONE thing that religion provides that is necessary or benifical for our daily life. And give me ONE proof of God. (Nature is beautiful = God, doesn't count)
Religion has multitudes of negative effects, it's extremely dangerous to mankind.
What good video, hope everyone in the world could see watch it and learn from it =D Ty bro the only thing we need more in this days its education, arts, sports and culture
@legion1a Well... before "Satan" became the hebrew word for "adversary," there was the root source of the word, which was the deity "Shaitan" from Ancient Mesopotamia. It seems to me that when Christians and Muslims invented their religion, they had to make an enemy of this older god. Many Satanists invoke Shaitan in their rituals by his original name. So it is the Christians that stole the idea of Satan to begin with. The Satanists didn't have to steal anything! No validation is necessary.
This is sooo fake. Guy is an obvious christian trying to make a point, with all the devil refrences. ATHIESTS DON'T CARE ABOUT SATAN. I never ever think about satan, and when I do (because some christian brings him up), I just chuckle. SATAN IS NOT REAL. Evil is real but it is done by humans....
@tuigleven I am the exact opposite. I believe everything we imagine exists because our thoughts make them real - as long as you believe in something, it exists. This includes Santa, the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy and... God. If you are an atheist who believes in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, then FOR YOU he exists, and communication with him is possible. If you have a thousand atheists believing and praying to the FSM, don't be surprised if he gives you some intelligent advice!
@RevJohn Eventough philosophicly it makes some sense, saying that everything you imagine is real, does nothing but take the word 'real' and make it completely meaningless. We need a word to diferentiate between the realness of the god we imagine and the realness of the wall that hits your face when your'e trying to walk through. There is nobody that says that ideas or imagined beings dont exist on the level you are talking about.
@RevJohn that is the most childish thing i have ever heard in my life. I am a grad student at Pitt and Sometimes get sleepless nights so that i can research medicine that may one day save yours and your families life. You ignorant bastard, i am ashamed to live on the same planet as you. You beleive things because you imagine them?! What if i "imagined" that cyanoborohydride will save your grandmothers life if I give it to her on her death bed. i doubt you will keep your philosophy then
@ibreathexcellence It has already been proven in laboratories that thought influences particles on a quantum level - now one person alone is not going to influence matter to the degree that you are suggesting, but millions of people over thousands of years have produced powerful thought forms that remain with us. They become the language of the subjective (unconscious) mind and even appear in your dreams. Jung's unconscious metaphors are ingrained in the brain matter of the staunchest atheists.
@ibreathexcellence According to Darwin's theory of evolution, if man spent most of his time under water, he would eventually develop gills over the course of a thousand years or more. Thought and desire born out of necessity has much to do with that biological change. But if I pushed your head under water right now and held it, I don't think you would grow gills in time to prevent suffocation and death! So your cyanoborohydride example is a bit extreme.
@RevJohn That is not at all what darwin suggested and is one of the biggest misconceptions regarding evolution. Evoluation by natural selections states that heritable variation leads to differential reproductive success. Key words, heritable variation. Novel phenotypes may arise during ones life that were not seen in the parental generation but will NOT be passed on. Only phenotypes caused by genes can be passed on to offspring. Your example would only be valid IF a mutation occured.
@ibreathexcellence It seems to me that humankind has gone through one hell of a lot of random mutations to get to where we are today. I simply do not believe it is coincidence. I believe everything in the Universe is connected and communicative and prescribe more to Bohm's Implicate Order. I believe the classical materialism that you espouse is a dead dinosaur and waiting to be buried, for good and forever. Your ideas concerning "dead matter" and "random coincidence" belong to the 20th century.
Oh, it's quite coincidence, really. In short; the reason you are wrong is because your way of thinking is ass-backwards. The universe wasn't made for us humans-- you do not a) have a sense of perspective of how big the universe is b) know how much of it is unhabitable, and c) have to be pretty arrogant to assume it's all just for us.
The universe wasn't made for us humans; We evolved to fit the universe.
@Xunkun Or, it's a SYMBIOTIC relationship. We create the Universe and the Universe creates us. THAT'S where quantum physics is leading us. But far from being arrogant, I realize we are a tiny, almost invisible cog in an enormous wheel.
I've known several Buddhists--both western and from China, even from Japan (I say "even from Japan" as most of my Japanese friends over the years have been atheists, for one reason or another). None of them mistook Buddha for a god or the Christ.
@CaptainSmallFoot And like I said, i attended a Buddhist temple in Boston of all places and discovered the same thing. However, I've been guilty of listening to the propaganda of other religions (Christians mostly) who want to rationalize THEIR belief system by pinning idol worship onto Buddhists. I take back what I said.
Madalyn Murray O'Hair, what a great example for kids. All kids should look up to someone like Madalyn with impeccable values, a hero for this generation. You should be ashamed of yourself holding someone like up as a positive influence.
@PorkFrog Nice... I know all these things.... so now you want to argue semantics. Sigh. I'm enlightened compared to 98 per cent of the people on this planet, but, like Buddha, I don't feel that I'm superior in any way. There must be something wrong with me, then.
@PorkFrog Nice. I know all these things. So now you want to argue semantics. Sigh. Okay. I'm enlightened compared to 98 per cent of the people on this planet, but, like Buddha, I don't feel that I'm superior in any way. There must be something wrong with me, then.
@RevJohn uhhhh....just because a reply is prompted by something you said doesn't mean its directed at you or about you. I posted it in case someone, anyone, doesn't understand
that's why I put the bracketed comment at the end of part 2
no thanks on arguing semantics-I have pizza to ate and semantics upsets my tummy
the OB [original Buddha] said 'search for the truth alone' and JC said 'the kingdom of God is within you' and 'I am the door-no one gets to the father except thru me'
Buddha and Christ are doors to enlightenment and 'God'
Guatama and Jesus were individuals who walked thru that door
[and yes I know you meant 'same' as in worshiped as some kind of deity. my impression of both's overall teaching is that they would HATE that and say 'you missed the point']
This video inspired conversations about stem cell research and possible robocops. LOL!! By the way, atheism doesn't equal goodness and intelligence and common sense. Hence, why Hitler, Stalin, Marquese de Sade, Po Plot, Mao, Marilyn Manson, Anton Lavey, and many others are/were the way they are/were.
@compsciguy Not that I disagree with what you are saying, but Hitler was a Christian and Marilyn Manson never hurt anybody. These two do not belong in this category.
But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and [that] he were drowned in the depth of the sea. ~Matthew 18:6 (KJV)
@4GodSoLoves Nice bible reference. Does that also include Christian parents and church pastors who accuse children of the crime of witchcraft and then abandon, torture and kill them? I think you had better watch this video /watch?v=MlRG9gXriVI then think about the very REAL evil brought into this world by your religion. A tradition of blood lust that started during the Middle Ages and persists to this day! Shame upon the religion of hypocrisy!! Shame, shame, shame!!!
Ugh...Christian crusade murders still occur to this day? Are you delusional? 9/11 was a religious crusade, but that wasn't Xianity. I think you got your religions mixed up. And witches do exist. They are Wiccans, and are part of the religion known as Wicca. And don't badmouth them. They believe in Karma, and it works for those who believe. Trust me.
I encourage all Humanists, Evolutionists, Atheists, Agnostic, Satanists, Buddhists and Luciferians to participate in the facebook group, Lucifer's Constellatory Vanguard.
No Deities, Devils, Ghouls, Ghosts, Spirits, or self deceit...
Creepy guy but funny video. I like the sound effects :D
Though I severely disagree with the Satanist/Rand idea of selfishness being the path to happiness.
TheAnubisDrake 1 month ago
This is funny. I'm just imagining a parent finding their 6-year-old child with this book instead of one of the zounds of Christian books for little kids. That parent would freak.. out..
DreamwaIker 1 month ago
This dude creeps me out...
Zentz29 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
GET READY FOR THE GREAT WARNING NOW!!!
thewarningsecondcoming . com
JezusSlave 2 months ago
I had a copy of the book once--a copy that had been given me by the famous author; it was stolen from me by another atheist. American Atheists Inc could still publish the book if it wanted to. The current leaders of AA want to play down the memory of the author in the minds of the people to gain the spotlight for themselves.
PeskyAtheist 3 months ago
Freedom of speech.Even for the ones who deny the Creator.God Almighty.Your chioce.If you believe in Jesus,you're saved.If you don't believe,you're damned.
DThor53 3 months ago
@DThor53 damn!
helvetesund 3 months ago
@DThor53
Given how many ridiculous contradiction there are in the bible and the severe lack of evidence I'll easily take my chances not hanging out with you freaks in case of your highly unlikely ancient imagined stories.
BeBoBli 1 month ago
I've got this book and I love milk.
But that is NOT a tall glass of milk by any standards.
2camjohn 4 months ago
Thanks for posting!
This kind of show should be aired every day, all over this planet. All kids should see this, many times.
Religion is poison, we have to end organised superstition before it ends us.
bary1234 4 months ago
this was on cable? Wow they are of their knockers! this guy looks like a satanist. =0
Duplooytim 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
I HAVE GIVEN OVER A DOZEN LECTURES defending scientific creationism before evolutionist science faculty and students at colleges. At the end, I would open up for questions, comments, rebuttals. The science faculty, for the most part, was silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true. Some in the science faculty offered tricky rebuttals and I successfully answered them. It's those who don't know enough science that I've found the most challenging to convince.
Mogley52 4 months ago
@Mogley52 Could you explain further my friend?
IronMan50780 4 months ago
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 4 months ago
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or a cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. Even for every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing harm and even extinction, not upward evolution. Genetic similarities are better explained due to a common design for common purposes.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NO REAL VIOLATION OF CHURCH/STATE SEPARATION in teaching both evolution and Intelligent Design because no one is being forced to believe in God's existence or any religion. Taxpayers on the both sides of the issue pay for public education. It is only fair that scientific arguments and evidence of both sides be presented, at the very least in public school textbooks. The issue is important because it affects people's lives, their values, philosophy, and worldview.
Mogley52 4 months ago
ATHEISTS ARE MORE EDUCATED is a red herring argument. What about all the educated that aren't atheists? Many times, the minority has been right in history. The atheists and evolutionists control the education system and certain arguments and evidences aren't presented or known, even among the educated. There are strong personal motives involved on the issue of origins. That is why it is important to present arguments and evidences of both sides to the public.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
YOU ARE EVIL
dianalove844 5 months ago
@perishedpyramid Can i offer you another glass of Kool-aid?
henchmen999 5 months ago
I have to disagree on one point, I'm 36 and still find toys fun and useful.
henchmen999 5 months ago
Here's the real version: God created Satan. Satan wanted to be God and rebelled, and was cast out of heaven. Satan wanted revenge. He created many false gods on earth and lead men away from God's love. Jesus came and died on the cross to save our sins. We now have a choice: follow God and accept His love, or follow sin/selves/idols and go to Hell.
PerishedPyramid 5 months ago
@PerishedPyramid But according to that, it's really just the word of "false God's" ect. against the word of God. How can you know which one is the truth?
maskunderscoreman 5 months ago
@smp2gbl See, when you use the word, "god," that means a lot of things to me. I can only imagine what it means to you. If you mean the god of the christian bible, then I'm afraid that definition is extremely self-limiting to me. And for you to claim to personally know god? To know god is to fully comprehend the laws of physics on a cosmic and quantum level. But I can easily tell you what god is NOT. God is not a silly entity, sitting on a cloud, making a list of who's naughty and nice.
RevJohn 5 months ago
@smp2gbl This was shot in 1994. He's past forty today and works in social services, taking care of the elderly and has a Master's degree in education and music. You WISH he was a "bully gone dumb" because it would help you rationalize all the flaws in your belief system. He is a spiritualist, by the way, who believes in the soul and the cycle of life, death and rebirth. God is impersonal - a pervasive force and intelligence that transcends reality.
RevJohn 5 months ago
@RevJohn
I'm so relieved to see someone that sees what a spiritualist is. however when he shot this I do think he was misguided as well. A bully is still a bully, I was raised Lutheran but I do not believe in a mass religion god, just an idea of something with a plan just something we don't see. It is not stupid to believe in a god only a god that as been disproved to exist, an imagination is a wonderful thing not something to be made fun of.
MrChaosdirge 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT ABOUT THE STARS? Gravity explains how the order found in the precise courses of trillions of stars is maintained, but gravity can't explain the origin of that order! Did all the trillions stars agree to get out of each others way? C'mon! Disorder in the universe is because of chance, but the order is because of design. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read article by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation site.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpret
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from variations produced having survival value. It doesn't produce variations. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHY THE INTELLIGENT DESIGN DEBATE? If you discovered a sand castle on a lonely beach, you can't prove it was made by either chance or design. No one observed its origins. Either it was designed or the random forces of wind and waves made the castle. You didn't find fingerprints. Did the wind wipe the fingerprints away? How do we know that there were fingerprints in the first place? By chance or by design? Both sides should present their case. Read the article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of transitional forms and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NOT ALL EVOLUTIONISTS even agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution. The bones are incomplete. There's no certainty of the bones belonging to the same creature. They can reconstruct whatever they want from these bones, and they have. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read my article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 6 months ago
very well done thanks for posting.and yes it put a smile on my face.the way u put it is so that everybody sees it how stupid it is.to believe that gods even wanna listen to us.i still dont get it that some people believe that if someone heals its god.if somebody starves its god.or its always the devil.but one of these two.unbelievable.bb
witchcerridwen 6 months ago
@Adamillionaire123 Holy shit, I can understand why you're so mad. Your shitty music vids are just as lame as the music in this vid, they're the same cra[. Well, except in this vid they actually try to use vocals, whereas you breath in a mike like the skinny little ho you are. Then you go torture people on YT by uploading it, thinking some record company is going to throw you a bone for creating a shitty track.
Oh yeah, a response for the pagan comment, err let's see... suck my dick. Solved.
avdmeers 6 months ago
@Adamillionaire123
Christianity is just as wrong as every other religion.
There are thousands of religions!
Why would only your religion be right?
They are all ancient stories fabricated by people who were intellectually immature.
How can you be so stupid as to accept Bronze Age explanations of reality!
Science now explains almost everything they were trying to explain with fairy tales!
Snakes and donkeys can’t talk!
Wake up!
legion1a 6 months ago
@EKastrioti
Only you and Helen Keller can't tell what is a bowl of cereal.
There is not a God to talk about.
legion1a 6 months ago
This video bashes religion so badly I feel sorry for theists. Even more so because no creationist argument has ever been able to bash the theory of evolution.
avdmeers 7 months ago
if this isn't a real book. it really should be. seriously, get it published.
k0rps3gynd3r 7 months ago
@k0rps3gynd3r Oh, it was published for a short time until the lady who wrote it was murdered.
RevJohn 7 months ago
@RevJohn You meant to say "assassinated".
dallaskenn 4 months ago
u must be so dumb that u put blondes to shame ! lol really ? even kids think ur dumb ..idiot..to deny Gods existence is to deny ur existence ..all philosophical scriptures have said God is with the human body ....that God is the cause of consciousnesses it is known as athman .......it is God ...the world is but an illusion ..if it is then there must be some real basis for it ..that is Brahman or God
vishnubhakthi 7 months ago
@vishnubhakthi I understand. But the "maya" or illusion we call our world is a thing that we created, as are the MASKS that we have created to describe Brahma, Vishnu, Kali, Krishna, Ganesha, etc., etc. In truth, God transcends all these forms.
RevJohn 7 months ago
@RevJohn :no..i am sorry i disagree .. it teaches something ..in Sanathan Dharm we have these stories called puranas ..they are illustration on how to live spiritually ....how to increase will power .and many good values are taught through stories called puranas ..but imagine if the puranas were not real events ..then one can just reject all values taught by them saying everything is imagination ! then no one would have any respect or values in society ....did you get my point ?
vishnubhakthi 6 months ago
@RevJohn
Um... is this like crackpot vs. crackpot?
twooffour 4 months ago
@RevJohn hi i got a question...is vishnu the same god of jews?
TheBestEVER4LIFE 4 months ago
@TheBestEVER4LIFE Vishnu is the chief deity in the Hindu religion.
RevJohn 4 months ago
@vishnubhakthi
So why do you think that the "consciousness" within us is some kind of one large entity, rather than single independent emergences?
Why call it "God" if that word doesn't make much sense without referring to some very powerful if not supreme entity, and mostly a personal at that?
How about you call it... CONSCIOUSNESS... and fuck off?
twooffour 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I just want to say serving GOD is a priviledge and in no way does it make us superior to non believers. I personally have NEVER felt more at peace then I do now knowing that I am doing as GOD commanded. If I am wrong and there is no Heaven or hell........no biggy. If I am right though...Well, Lets just say I like those odds alot more than if I believed otherwise: ) I urge you to get right with GOD before it's too late.
roddy35wv 7 months ago
@MrArpas123 WAY TO CLICHE! Why would a atheist like me want to sound like that by the way you're typing?
Underyourstaircase 7 months ago
:'( Can I jizz on your face, rev? Then I want to throw you off a building
JefteNintendoNerd 7 months ago
@JefteNintendoNerd That's very romantic, Nerd.
RevJohn 7 months ago 4
@RevJohn Ok I apologize... Dude, for a atheist you are not an asshole. and btw nice videos. I find them very entertaining.
JefteNintendoNerd 7 months ago
@Raldefas
2:256 - "Let there be no compulsion in religion".
You can't force a non-Muslim to convert to Islam. This is reflected in Islamic Jurisprudence. Muslims remained a small minority in the Rashidun, Umayyad and early 'Abbasid Caliphates. Do you know why? Because the Qur'an says that you can't force people to convert to Islam, and this has became an orthodox doctrine in Islam. Mass conversions to Islam only occurred under the 'Abbasids - people converted for financial benefits.
Klingschor 7 months ago
atheists and satanists are two different groups you ignoramus!
atheists believe in things they can see, not a big bad demon in some fiery place. they are not religious.
read about the lucifer experiment and you will see that all modern religions are bullshit. including satanism, paganism, and whateverthehellyoucallreligionism.
meanwhile, leave youtube.
LANN98 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 7 months ago
Love this video. Where can i find this book, or did you make it?
jujuluvification 7 months ago
Oh damn i love this hahahahahaha even kids know religion is trash
sebita4 8 months ago 2
Actually, Islam forbids Muslims from forcing people to convert to Islam.
Klingschor 8 months ago
you sound like a complete idiot
lkreyna2 8 months ago
The message is true and all... But why the satanic references at the end?
What the guy is saying has nothing to do with worshiping satan... Satan is just another "god" that these dumb dark age people made up.
KeistasZmogelis 8 months ago
this is freaking creepy O_O
themousemaster 8 months ago
this guy seems like a fatter, brown-haired john malkovich
xpostal1289x 8 months ago
I get a kick out of how these overactive Atheist types and "Satanists" always die horrific tragic deaths--yeah, probably just a coincidence...
RisingAboveMyself 8 months ago
@RisingAboveMyself so now god can't even wait for the unbelievers to die to begin torturing them for eternity?
afatdutch 8 months ago
Comment removed
RisingAboveMyself 8 months ago
@RisingAboveMyself religion is the biggest infection the world has ever seen. Just look how you wish pain and torture for someone just because they dont believe the same thing as you. thats some fucked up egotistical shit right there.
afatdutch 8 months ago
@RisingAboveMyself you are preety sick
BlackMetalWorld 8 months ago
@RisingAboveMyself Is that God who is making them die horrific tragic deaths...just like when God gives little kids lukemia and they die horrific tragic deaths. God should only make atheists and satanists die horrific tragic deaths...I don't like when he kills innocent children that way. I wonder if we just pray for him to kill more atheists and less children it might come true right?
cinavenom1 8 months ago
@RisingAboveMyself You are talking about one or two public figures, one of them a murderer who was given the death penalty, I believe. Other than that, you're statement holds absolutely no water. I could begin right now and list twenty Christians, right off the top of my head, who died terrible, tragic, horrific, deaths. With a little research, I could name hundreds more.
RevJohn 8 months ago 6
Where can I get this book? Is there a scanned copy somewhere?
NinjaRunningWild 9 months ago
Death threats. From theists. lol Awesome!
NinjaRunningWild 9 months ago
this is not for kids. dress up in a clown suit and try explain that God is a metaphore for believing in yourself. "Dear God..." is another way of say "Note to self..." or "Dear collective consciousness, please note..." dressed up as a smug druid adressing adults as if they were children may not be te most effective strategy. However, I am on board with you, Holmes. Keep up the good work. (:
monsieurmike 9 months ago
@monsieurmike would that be John Holmes--or Santana Holmes? Cuz, otherwise, you might have meant "Home's"--as in HomeBoy...which is probably what you were attempting to convey...[unrecognizable words can be explored at dictionary com]
RisingAboveMyself 8 months ago
Atheists aren't satanists. Satanists are Satanists. Atheists are Atheists. You stunned fuck. Do you have any idea of the origins and meaning of the word Atheist or Theist? A theist is someone who believes in a god or gods. The "A" is in reference to a lack of the former. Like someone who enjoys sex and related practices is called "sexual" but someone who has no desire for such is called "Asexual". So "Atheist" is without your ridiculous belief in any God, wether it be Satan or God.
yoingtin 9 months ago
what i always wondered is why is religion not natural it has to be taught after all why would it need to be taught if was true it would not need to be something learned it would be as natural as walking.
johndebbra 10 months ago 2
@johndebbra Of course it would need to be taugh.
calculus is true yet no one is born knowing calculus.
E=MC2 is true yet no one is borning knowing that.
badpanda84 9 months ago
@badpanda84 the whole point is that people would know there is God since he created all and knows all hy would he want it not known,and there would only be one religion because knowing there is a God people would know who he was and his wishes,that is what i mean by learned,
johndebbra 9 months ago
@badpanda84 "calculus" is not "true" or natural. It's a man made system. We can some up with some other concept like calculus, but we chose the one that works best. Don't be stupid.
geniusjas87 9 months ago
@geniusjas87 Of course its "true" as true as say E=MC2 or germ theory.
How can you claim calculus is not true. Everything is man made in the sense man has to discover them.
My point still stands then.. if you dont like the calucus example then how about germ theory.. no one is born knowing about germs. yet that is natural
badpanda84 9 months ago
@badpanda84 Germs are examinable and it's a fact. God is a concept. It's abstract. It has absolutely no effect on the real world. Therefore religions are useless, because the "God" ideas that religions are based on are infact imaginary. Tell me ONE thing that religion provides that is necessary or benifical for our daily life. And give me ONE proof of God. (Nature is beautiful = God, doesn't count)
Religion has multitudes of negative effects, it's extremely dangerous to mankind.
geniusjas87 9 months ago
What good video, hope everyone in the world could see watch it and learn from it =D Ty bro the only thing we need more in this days its education, arts, sports and culture
6runge 11 months ago
atheism not equal satanism.
MidnightRayn 11 months ago
A really funny and wise child´s book!
VitoPossilipo 11 months ago
You suck jesus freak.
jjejeep 11 months ago
Atheists don't believe in Satan!
Satan Worshippers are theists.
Satan and Jesus (or Allah) need each other, they are both in the same fairy tales, to validate each other.
If you believe in one, you have to believe in the other!
To an outside observer of religion, Satanism and the Muslim religion seem to be pretty much the same thing!
But the Muslims are actually killing infidels!
Satanists don't seem to be killing people, which makes them better!
All religions are wrong!
Islam is evil!
legion1a 11 months ago 34
@legion1a Well... before "Satan" became the hebrew word for "adversary," there was the root source of the word, which was the deity "Shaitan" from Ancient Mesopotamia. It seems to me that when Christians and Muslims invented their religion, they had to make an enemy of this older god. Many Satanists invoke Shaitan in their rituals by his original name. So it is the Christians that stole the idea of Satan to begin with. The Satanists didn't have to steal anything! No validation is necessary.
RevJohn 11 months ago 3
@RevJohn
Interesting history lesson!
But that has nothing to do with the fact that Satanists are not Atheists.
Muslims and Christians NEED Satan, so they can have an enemy to battle!
You may not need validation, but they do
On12/2/98 I published an interview I did withThe Daemon Egan, High Priest of the First Church of Satan,
in it he said "Satan represents indulgence, not abstinence - vital
existence, not spiritual pipedreams!"
"Represents" is the key word here.
None of this is real!
legion1a 11 months ago
@legion1a "Muslims and Christians NEED Satan, so they can have an enemy to battle!"
Why?? Don't they have each other --
badpanda84 9 months ago
@legion1a what? Satanism can be atheistic please inform yourself
BlackMetalWorld 8 months ago
This is sooo fake. Guy is an obvious christian trying to make a point, with all the devil refrences. ATHIESTS DON'T CARE ABOUT SATAN. I never ever think about satan, and when I do (because some christian brings him up), I just chuckle. SATAN IS NOT REAL. Evil is real but it is done by humans....
tuigleven 11 months ago
@tuigleven I am the exact opposite. I believe everything we imagine exists because our thoughts make them real - as long as you believe in something, it exists. This includes Santa, the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy and... God. If you are an atheist who believes in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, then FOR YOU he exists, and communication with him is possible. If you have a thousand atheists believing and praying to the FSM, don't be surprised if he gives you some intelligent advice!
RevJohn 11 months ago
@RevJohn Eventough philosophicly it makes some sense, saying that everything you imagine is real, does nothing but take the word 'real' and make it completely meaningless. We need a word to diferentiate between the realness of the god we imagine and the realness of the wall that hits your face when your'e trying to walk through. There is nobody that says that ideas or imagined beings dont exist on the level you are talking about.
tuigleven 11 months ago
@RevJohn that is the most childish thing i have ever heard in my life. I am a grad student at Pitt and Sometimes get sleepless nights so that i can research medicine that may one day save yours and your families life. You ignorant bastard, i am ashamed to live on the same planet as you. You beleive things because you imagine them?! What if i "imagined" that cyanoborohydride will save your grandmothers life if I give it to her on her death bed. i doubt you will keep your philosophy then
ibreathexcellence 10 months ago
@ibreathexcellence It has already been proven in laboratories that thought influences particles on a quantum level - now one person alone is not going to influence matter to the degree that you are suggesting, but millions of people over thousands of years have produced powerful thought forms that remain with us. They become the language of the subjective (unconscious) mind and even appear in your dreams. Jung's unconscious metaphors are ingrained in the brain matter of the staunchest atheists.
RevJohn 10 months ago
@ibreathexcellence According to Darwin's theory of evolution, if man spent most of his time under water, he would eventually develop gills over the course of a thousand years or more. Thought and desire born out of necessity has much to do with that biological change. But if I pushed your head under water right now and held it, I don't think you would grow gills in time to prevent suffocation and death! So your cyanoborohydride example is a bit extreme.
RevJohn 10 months ago
@RevJohn That is not at all what darwin suggested and is one of the biggest misconceptions regarding evolution. Evoluation by natural selections states that heritable variation leads to differential reproductive success. Key words, heritable variation. Novel phenotypes may arise during ones life that were not seen in the parental generation but will NOT be passed on. Only phenotypes caused by genes can be passed on to offspring. Your example would only be valid IF a mutation occured.
ibreathexcellence 10 months ago
@ibreathexcellence It seems to me that humankind has gone through one hell of a lot of random mutations to get to where we are today. I simply do not believe it is coincidence. I believe everything in the Universe is connected and communicative and prescribe more to Bohm's Implicate Order. I believe the classical materialism that you espouse is a dead dinosaur and waiting to be buried, for good and forever. Your ideas concerning "dead matter" and "random coincidence" belong to the 20th century.
RevJohn 10 months ago
Oh, it's quite coincidence, really. In short; the reason you are wrong is because your way of thinking is ass-backwards. The universe wasn't made for us humans-- you do not a) have a sense of perspective of how big the universe is b) know how much of it is unhabitable, and c) have to be pretty arrogant to assume it's all just for us.
The universe wasn't made for us humans; We evolved to fit the universe.
In other words: "We were made for the universe."
Xunkun 9 months ago
@Xunkun Or, it's a SYMBIOTIC relationship. We create the Universe and the Universe creates us. THAT'S where quantum physics is leading us. But far from being arrogant, I realize we are a tiny, almost invisible cog in an enormous wheel.
RevJohn 9 months ago
@RevJohn
RJ,
I've known several Buddhists--both western and from China, even from Japan (I say "even from Japan" as most of my Japanese friends over the years have been atheists, for one reason or another). None of them mistook Buddha for a god or the Christ.
CaptainSmallFoot 11 months ago
@CaptainSmallFoot And like I said, i attended a Buddhist temple in Boston of all places and discovered the same thing. However, I've been guilty of listening to the propaganda of other religions (Christians mostly) who want to rationalize THEIR belief system by pinning idol worship onto Buddhists. I take back what I said.
RevJohn 11 months ago
@RevJohn
Yep, I scrolled down and read previous comments after I'd already posted mine. Just was a bit too late =x.
We've all fallen victim to religious propaganda, or will, at some point in our lives.
CaptainSmallFoot 11 months ago
Oh no!!! Forst I was angry at the theists for brainwashing kids... Now we're doing it, too!!!! JUST LEAVE THEM ALONE!!!!
Mattt8D 11 months ago
So, essentially, you're just simply saying you think the concept of God is 'silly' without any reasoning to back up your claim?
Wow, and you call theists irrational...
TheHumpadump 11 months ago
If this video didn't have so many "satan" things on it, it'd actually work to pull people out of their delusions
iliveon 11 months ago
Madalyn Murray O'Hair, what a great example for kids. All kids should look up to someone like Madalyn with impeccable values, a hero for this generation. You should be ashamed of yourself holding someone like up as a positive influence.
mm123 11 months ago
LOL awesome!
honorship 11 months ago
Rofl wtf is this.
LegendZZZZZZ 11 months ago
@RevJohn The Buddha IS in the same category as Christ
the 'Buddha'='enlightened one', and the 'Christ'='anointed one'
both are titles
let's use 'king' but 'manager' would do just as well
there are many kings and their name isn't 'king' its a title they get when they ascend to the position
[cont]
PorkFrog 11 months ago
@PorkFrog Nice... I know all these things.... so now you want to argue semantics. Sigh. I'm enlightened compared to 98 per cent of the people on this planet, but, like Buddha, I don't feel that I'm superior in any way. There must be something wrong with me, then.
RevJohn 11 months ago
@PorkFrog Nice. I know all these things. So now you want to argue semantics. Sigh. Okay. I'm enlightened compared to 98 per cent of the people on this planet, but, like Buddha, I don't feel that I'm superior in any way. There must be something wrong with me, then.
RevJohn 11 months ago
@RevJohn uhhhh....just because a reply is prompted by something you said doesn't mean its directed at you or about you. I posted it in case someone, anyone, doesn't understand
that's why I put the bracketed comment at the end of part 2
no thanks on arguing semantics-I have pizza to ate and semantics upsets my tummy
PorkFrog 11 months ago
[cont]
the OB [original Buddha] said 'search for the truth alone' and JC said 'the kingdom of God is within you' and 'I am the door-no one gets to the father except thru me'
Buddha and Christ are doors to enlightenment and 'God'
Guatama and Jesus were individuals who walked thru that door
[and yes I know you meant 'same' as in worshiped as some kind of deity. my impression of both's overall teaching is that they would HATE that and say 'you missed the point']
PorkFrog 11 months ago
@atheistdestroyer1
Now why would you say such a thing? ;-)
It's not too nice, you know; someone could possibly be offended by a display of such coarse words. :P
N0tsaved 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ATHEISTS!!! i NOTICED YOUR ALL CIRCLE JERKING ASS FUCKING DICK SUCKING FAGGOTS!!!
atheistdestroyer1 1 year ago
This video inspired conversations about stem cell research and possible robocops. LOL!! By the way, atheism doesn't equal goodness and intelligence and common sense. Hence, why Hitler, Stalin, Marquese de Sade, Po Plot, Mao, Marilyn Manson, Anton Lavey, and many others are/were the way they are/were.
compsciguy 1 year ago
@compsciguy Not that I disagree with what you are saying, but Hitler was a Christian and Marilyn Manson never hurt anybody. These two do not belong in this category.
LuvStruckMess 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ATHEISTS!!! I AM THE ATHEIST ASS RAPIST!!! I RAPE THE ASSES OF ATHEISTS!!! BEWARE!!! WATCH YOUR ASS!!! BECAUSE I'M CUMMING ALL UP IN THAT ASS!!!
atheistdestroyer1 1 year ago
@RevJohn I've yet to meet one. And I know quite a few : /.
BigLundi 1 year ago
@BigLundi Good point. I never met any in the Buddhist temple I belonged to. I am going by hearsay and that's something I should be wary of.
RevJohn 1 year ago
I wonder if whoever wrote that book is aware Bhudda is not worshipped as a god :(.
BigLundi 1 year ago
Atheists!!! Suck My Cock!!!
atheistdestroyer1 1 year ago
@atheistdestroyer1 You want to be homosexual with us?
BigLundi 1 year ago
@atheistdestroyer1 Alright... but I'll have you know, I don't swallow.
RevJohn 1 year ago 10
Scary O_O
1960ClassicRocker 1 year ago
But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and [that] he were drowned in the depth of the sea. ~Matthew 18:6 (KJV)
4GodSoLoves 1 year ago
@4GodSoLoves Nice bible reference. Does that also include Christian parents and church pastors who accuse children of the crime of witchcraft and then abandon, torture and kill them? I think you had better watch this video /watch?v=MlRG9gXriVI then think about the very REAL evil brought into this world by your religion. A tradition of blood lust that started during the Middle Ages and persists to this day! Shame upon the religion of hypocrisy!! Shame, shame, shame!!!
RevJohn 1 year ago 2
@RevJohn
Ugh...Christian crusade murders still occur to this day? Are you delusional? 9/11 was a religious crusade, but that wasn't Xianity. I think you got your religions mixed up. And witches do exist. They are Wiccans, and are part of the religion known as Wicca. And don't badmouth them. They believe in Karma, and it works for those who believe. Trust me.
compsciguy 1 year ago
I encourage all Humanists, Evolutionists, Atheists, Agnostic, Satanists, Buddhists and Luciferians to participate in the facebook group, Lucifer's Constellatory Vanguard.
No Deities, Devils, Ghouls, Ghosts, Spirits, or self deceit...
Just knowledge, light, and understanding...
resinscraper13 1 year ago