The vast majority of libertarians support abortion, and this is especially true for anarcho-capitalists who deduce their positions from the right to self-ownership (property). In order to remain logically consistent, they must defend this barbaric practice.
@Questfortruth86 Are you implying that logical inconsistency is less barbaric? What right do you have to tell somebody what to do with their property, e.g. a women with her body? How can you defend such tyrannical rule/enslavement as less barbaric?
Remember, just because something as sinful, doesn't give you the right to coerce against people. Moral behavior brought about through coercion is not moral behavior at all. Moral behavior can only ever emerge through a person freely choosing it.
"What right do you have to tell somebody what to do with their property, e.g. a women with her body?"
I can say and think whatever I want. I just don't have the right to use coercion. If a person wants to kill himself, then fine. I don't agree with it, but ultimately it's not my choice.
"Just because something as sinful, doesn't give you the right to coerce against people."
Simple, killing an unborn child is immoral. If we don't have the right to life, we have no rights.
Anyway, looking forward to reading this book! With over two billion Christians in the world, it would be great if they all understood that Christian values demand a respect for property rights, sound money and limited government.
rational thought defended with irrational thinking.
modelmark 1 year ago
I wonder how he might square an anti abortion position with a women's right in the *property* of her body.
mbarkhau 1 year ago
The vast majority of libertarians support abortion, and this is especially true for anarcho-capitalists who deduce their positions from the right to self-ownership (property). In order to remain logically consistent, they must defend this barbaric practice.
Questfortruth86 1 year ago
@Questfortruth86 Are you implying that logical inconsistency is less barbaric? What right do you have to tell somebody what to do with their property, e.g. a women with her body? How can you defend such tyrannical rule/enslavement as less barbaric?
Remember, just because something as sinful, doesn't give you the right to coerce against people. Moral behavior brought about through coercion is not moral behavior at all. Moral behavior can only ever emerge through a person freely choosing it.
mbarkhau 1 year ago
"What right do you have to tell somebody what to do with their property, e.g. a women with her body?"
I can say and think whatever I want. I just don't have the right to use coercion. If a person wants to kill himself, then fine. I don't agree with it, but ultimately it's not my choice.
"Just because something as sinful, doesn't give you the right to coerce against people."
Agreed.
Questfortruth86 1 year ago
Simple, killing an unborn child is immoral. If we don't have the right to life, we have no rights.
Anyway, looking forward to reading this book! With over two billion Christians in the world, it would be great if they all understood that Christian values demand a respect for property rights, sound money and limited government.
perezDeSanFernando 1 year ago
I don't believe that any religion is required to prove that private property is completely ethical and justified.
.
kmg501 1 year ago 5
@kmg501
he never stated that it was necessary; he merely made the point that the Bible mandates private property rights.
FoxPMcCloud 1 year ago 6
Comment removed
FoxPMcCloud 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure that this was the point of the presentation. IHO.
drchiodo 1 year ago
Religion is irrelevant to whether or not an economic theory works. It's quite simple. More freedom and liberty = a better economy.
bttalbot 1 year ago 11
awesome, Shawn
EsCurve 1 year ago