Ok I believe in Big Bounce Theory. If you look at Big Bang Theory they say that our universe expanded from small volume and before this big bang there was a universe that happened to collapse in to that small volume. And they say that the sign of cosmological constant can reverse in about 10 billion years from now.
So that would be ((14 + 10) * 2) billion years = 48 billion years per Big Bounce cycle.
1.4821824 * 10^23 / 48 * 10^9 = 3,087,880,000,000 th Big Bounce cycle we are on now.
No. I do not find any evidence for Fibonacci sequences in cycles.
The most commonly quoted Fibonacci sequence in astronomy is the planetary distances from the Sun. The result is not significant and fits other ratios better.
It might be interpreted as expansions and crunches. However IMO it is really just changes in relationships that are better understood without a big bang concept.
This is much more than a day of Brahman. The Hindu cycles are short compared to this. However the Hindu and Buddhist cycles do fit with the "shorter" ones in the millions to billions of years range.
I have to admit my laziness Ray,one day is as such,but then multiply it by the year and then one hundred years of the life of Brahman. My computer will not do it, and my brain...well my brain is the problem you see..lol..by the way,did you get my message about Bulk Space?
I believe that there was a universe before the big bang, but it just ended in big crunch. And the whole universe folded in to a black hole (combining space-time with matter-energy in to about 10 pounds seed). Because it folded into black hole time became imaginary (10 + j).
Then later big bang happened which created space-time (- energy) with equal amounts of matter-energy (+ energy) and this space-time still stretches (expands) today, till it can't stretch no more and then will collapse.
Ask a physicist whether this universe is a black hole. The answer might be no. If it is, ask what are the conditions for a black whole. The correct answer is that the Mass / Radius ratio reaches a certain critical value. Ask if this universe has that value. The correct answer is "probably yes".
I think the Mayan calendar system is interesting in incorporating Venus, but otherwise just a local time keeping system like years, months and days. When the big digit turns over I expect it to be just like 1999 turning into 2000.
The only systems that have huge long cycles that are universal (rather than just local) are Indian. The Buddha described the longest cycle in terms of taking a sesame seed out of a 7 mile x 7 mile x 7 mile hole every hundred years. This gives the same answer!
Hmmm i would urge you to take another look at the Mayan calendar system. There is an aspect to it that is mapping evolutionary progression for this planet, an aspect of time that is beyond just mechanical.
I expect the next few years leading to 2012 to be vastly different than the years preceeding 2000. The whole Y2K thing was an irrational paranoia about the flawed gregorian system.
The whole 2012 thing fits right in with harmonics. You are in a great position to explain it like no other!
Forgot to add, you should check out Terence McKennas "Timewave Zero" theory, which is based upon an extrapolation of the Chinese I-Ching system. Again i think this fits right in with your harmonic ideas.
Thanks for your thoughts on the Mayan calendar. Can you recommend a web site that has the information because I have not found one. You cannot quote a URL in here so need to give a name that can be searched by. Regards, Ray
Ok I believe in Big Bounce Theory. If you look at Big Bang Theory they say that our universe expanded from small volume and before this big bang there was a universe that happened to collapse in to that small volume. And they say that the sign of cosmological constant can reverse in about 10 billion years from now.
So that would be ((14 + 10) * 2) billion years = 48 billion years per Big Bounce cycle.
1.4821824 * 10^23 / 48 * 10^9 = 3,087,880,000,000 th Big Bounce cycle we are on now.
sonnydey 2 months ago
Comment removed
sonnydey 2 months ago
Comment removed
sonnydey 2 months ago
So basically you're saying that the universe is older than the big bang?
420Travesty 6 months ago
It's a 'large number'... Is it a measure of how much 'physical' time exists in the Universe ?
granddad2002 1 year ago
Is there a fibonacci sequence application to this cycle?
idesofmarchUNIAEA 2 years ago
No. I do not find any evidence for Fibonacci sequences in cycles.
The most commonly quoted Fibonacci sequence in astronomy is the planetary distances from the Sun. The result is not significant and fits other ratios better.
artynz 2 years ago
THAT is amazing. Did you read Walter Russel cosmogony?
atessmann 2 years ago
No, but other people have asked the same thing.
artynz 2 years ago
by "cycle of the universe" are you referring to expansions and "big crunches"? or something else? like vibrations of super strings or something?
Aprilshowersss 2 years ago
It might be interpreted as expansions and crunches. However IMO it is really just changes in relationships that are better understood without a big bang concept.
artynz 2 years ago
How old is the Universe.
Dragoonkyle 2 years ago
I don't know. However it seems it must be many times that longest cycle.
artynz 2 years ago
One day in the life of Brahman is 4.32 billion years.
YogiToad 2 years ago
This is much more than a day of Brahman. The Hindu cycles are short compared to this. However the Hindu and Buddhist cycles do fit with the "shorter" ones in the millions to billions of years range.
artynz 2 years ago
I have to admit my laziness Ray,one day is as such,but then multiply it by the year and then one hundred years of the life of Brahman. My computer will not do it, and my brain...well my brain is the problem you see..lol..by the way,did you get my message about Bulk Space?
YogiToad 2 years ago
I believe that there was a universe before the big bang, but it just ended in big crunch. And the whole universe folded in to a black hole (combining space-time with matter-energy in to about 10 pounds seed). Because it folded into black hole time became imaginary (10 + j).
Then later big bang happened which created space-time (- energy) with equal amounts of matter-energy (+ energy) and this space-time still stretches (expands) today, till it can't stretch no more and then will collapse.
sonnydey 2 years ago
Ask a physicist whether this universe is a black hole. The answer might be no. If it is, ask what are the conditions for a black whole. The correct answer is that the Mass / Radius ratio reaches a certain critical value. Ask if this universe has that value. The correct answer is "probably yes".
artynz 2 years ago
bloody hell!
capnvideo2006 3 years ago
I think the Mayan calendar system is interesting in incorporating Venus, but otherwise just a local time keeping system like years, months and days. When the big digit turns over I expect it to be just like 1999 turning into 2000.
The only systems that have huge long cycles that are universal (rather than just local) are Indian. The Buddha described the longest cycle in terms of taking a sesame seed out of a 7 mile x 7 mile x 7 mile hole every hundred years. This gives the same answer!
artynz 3 years ago
Hmmm i would urge you to take another look at the Mayan calendar system. There is an aspect to it that is mapping evolutionary progression for this planet, an aspect of time that is beyond just mechanical.
I expect the next few years leading to 2012 to be vastly different than the years preceeding 2000. The whole Y2K thing was an irrational paranoia about the flawed gregorian system.
The whole 2012 thing fits right in with harmonics. You are in a great position to explain it like no other!
shrunkensimon 3 years ago
Forgot to add, you should check out Terence McKennas "Timewave Zero" theory, which is based upon an extrapolation of the Chinese I-Ching system. Again i think this fits right in with your harmonic ideas.
shrunkensimon 3 years ago
OK, will have a look, thanks.
artynz 3 years ago
Hi Shrunkensimon
Thanks for your thoughts on the Mayan calendar. Can you recommend a web site that has the information because I have not found one. You cannot quote a URL in here so need to give a name that can be searched by. Regards, Ray
artynz 3 years ago
Interesting. I wonder if this could possibly fit into the Mayan Calendar system somehow?
shrunkensimon 3 years ago