Added: 2 years ago
From: AssociatedPress
Views: 1,310
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • hahaha thats the funniest shit ever!

  • Yes,I would like to know why the AP had to throw that lethal weapon charge in there for.They know that is not the legal term of the taser weapon is not applicable with the law of sheep. Looks like the cats outta the bag.

  • Um perhaps because that is what the man was charged with?

    Yes it is quite hillarious that this is a "harmless" weapon when used on civilians but here they call a "deadly weapon'.

    I have a heart condition/probably would kill me/but then again I don't see being in a position for an officer to use one/but then again I have seen a few legit case of abuse with and without a tazer.

    I suppose law enforcement would like us folks with heart conditions to always wear a bright red shirt?

  • So how come its not "assault with a deadly weapon" when used against civilians ?

    Are civilians really such animals, that we count for nothing ?

  • Answer to the first question is in the second question.

    Answer to the second question is: Yes!

  • well, maybe somebody brings ot that side of us ?

  • wtf is with ap sending the same vid 2 3 or 5 times

  • she probly deserved it

  • a conclusion without any evidence

  • Comment removed

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more