A great, great song. If I had to rate any songs off off Wind & Wuthering, I would rate 11th Earl of Mar, Quiet Earth and Wot Gorilla higher but I do really love this song. Great albumn.
@kaveman1021 Not only that, Collins wasn't able to sing that song in 1978 with as much power and conviction as he did here in 1980 (and no doubt this is from the Lyceum show in 1980). Listen to the live version from Japan in Nov. 1978 and compare it to this one - night and day. Somewhere in between "And Then There Were Three" and "Duke" Phil Collins became a real singer - not that he couldn't sing before, but the change in the power and projection of his voice in less than two years is stark...
It depends on the song. Phils voice and the entire band are better in 1978, especially for Deep in the Motherlode or In The Cage. In 1978 they were playing at a faster, pandamonium tempo. I think the One for the Vine live 1977 are the best, especially 1/2/77 Rainbow theatre, which is beyond belief. The Lady lies 1978 live is done better than 1980. Better tempo, and in 1978 Tony has the polymoog and other keyboards that he didn't have in 1978 giving a much more cosmic sound..
Phils voice in 1976 or 1977. Deep and thick. 1978, pandamonium voice, fast tempo. 1980, Deep and thick, versions slower, different keyboards, especially Deep in the motherlode.
@omegaxyz1 Boy you got that right! It should especially be mandatory for many of today's pop stars who could learn a thing or two from bands like Genesis who know how to make real music and have real talent!
@stevedrums You are 100% right. Been a huge fan of Genesis for 40 years, and this song can only be fully appreciated on the album version. Played live, too quirky and choppy with all the time changes... Mike's bass lines sound great though...
This was Collins' golden era - he was a marvellous showman, not that the songs needed anything added to them, but he was carrying on the tradition Gabriel started.
Being a 30 year plus Genesis fan, I have to weigh in on this video-posting. IMHO, I think is a very fine version of this Genesis classic. Phil's small but poignant vocal inflections added to his physical demonstrations only ADD to the musical majesty that is the Genesis brand...ok, I'm done...whew !
Wll, for starters I thought that Phil sang it with more clarity and emotion in the studio. I didn't like the electronics that Chester used (they were in their infancy in thsoe days) at the begining of the instrumental passage in the middle of the song. It's just little things and I realize I'm being picky, but for me it just flows much better and carries more emotional weight on record than live.
@stevedrums You should hear that piece of music on "second´s out" and you should have seen the show, wehn "seconds out" was made... I hardly cried that much ance again!
@deirfgeisllots If there was a tour of theirs that I could have gone back in time to see it would have been that one. However, I was only 7 at the tiem and my older brother was a 'Dead Head'!
Some of the 1977 live versions of One for the Vine are better than the studio. One for The Vine, 1/2/77 Rainbow Theatre is better than the studio version.
Follow me! I'll play the game you want me, until I find a way back home.
BELLISSIMA
galleppe 1 month ago
A great, great song. If I had to rate any songs off off Wind & Wuthering, I would rate 11th Earl of Mar, Quiet Earth and Wot Gorilla higher but I do really love this song. Great albumn.
mattwixted01 1 month ago
Fantástico !!!!
diogenesfernandotube 1 month ago
wind and wuthering...
skippy180864 1 month ago
awesome...
aryprihatmono 2 months ago
Phil es un genio, el unico, me vuelve loco cuando sube a la bateria y le pega. Me encanta este tema.
michito46 2 months ago
Great song.....From a great album.
MrWatchman76 2 months ago
Artists can be billionaires.Ruebens was,Ingres was.
TheTherese3 2 months ago
@MrAlexxluis, yes, sorry I already discovered I was wrong
arwinkortleever1 3 months ago
Excuses !!!!!! It IS 1980
arwinkortleever1 3 months ago
This can't be 1980. Collins' beard was shaved in 1978.
arwinkortleever1 3 months ago
@arwinkortleever1 Dude, check the videos "Duchess" and "Misunderstanding" from 1980-1981.
MrAlexxluis 3 months ago
@arwinkortleever1...Uhh yes, it is 1980. And It is possible that he shaved in 1978 and grew it back in 1979 and kept it through 1980. Which he did.
kaveman1021 3 months ago
@kaveman1021 Not only that, Collins wasn't able to sing that song in 1978 with as much power and conviction as he did here in 1980 (and no doubt this is from the Lyceum show in 1980). Listen to the live version from Japan in Nov. 1978 and compare it to this one - night and day. Somewhere in between "And Then There Were Three" and "Duke" Phil Collins became a real singer - not that he couldn't sing before, but the change in the power and projection of his voice in less than two years is stark...
robste 3 months ago
Comment removed
yesshows100 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@robste
It depends on the song. Phils voice and the entire band are better in 1978, especially for Deep in the Motherlode or In The Cage. In 1978 they were playing at a faster, pandamonium tempo. I think the One for the Vine live 1977 are the best, especially 1/2/77 Rainbow theatre, which is beyond belief. The Lady lies 1978 live is done better than 1980. Better tempo, and in 1978 Tony has the polymoog and other keyboards that he didn't have in 1978 giving a much more cosmic sound..
yesshows100 2 months ago
Comment removed
yesshows100 2 months ago
@robste
Phils voice in 1976 or 1977. Deep and thick. 1978, pandamonium voice, fast tempo. 1980, Deep and thick, versions slower, different keyboards, especially Deep in the motherlode.
yesshows100 2 months ago
This song should be made mandatory to listen to at least once a week by law =)
omegaxyz1 4 months ago 16
@omegaxyz1 How bout everyone in the planet should listen to this song
kfsfkakf 2 months ago
@omegaxyz1 Boy you got that right! It should especially be mandatory for many of today's pop stars who could learn a thing or two from bands like Genesis who know how to make real music and have real talent!
LowellDevil 2 months ago
@omegaxyz1 I´d say everyday. Too many crazy people out there
goldwing1964 2 months ago
My fav song of the Post Gabriel era.
vivelavidarocka 4 months ago
@vivelavidarocka Nah! take that back. There are actually so many others as well.
vivelavidarocka 4 months ago
@stevedrums You are 100% right. Been a huge fan of Genesis for 40 years, and this song can only be fully appreciated on the album version. Played live, too quirky and choppy with all the time changes... Mike's bass lines sound great though...
TheDeebri55 4 months ago
One of the rare bands who were narrating-on-music by occasions.
A feeling-from-old-days , ever so strong.
Great ! Great song!
kjallesoft 4 months ago
This was Collins' golden era - he was a marvellous showman, not that the songs needed anything added to them, but he was carrying on the tradition Gabriel started.
SirensCry 4 months ago
Mike Rutherford is a VERY FINE Bass player , and here he is just brilliant , a very HARD bass line for sure !!
ksjoyjespeace 5 months ago
song's so good, performance so good, but i wish collins didnt look like some sort of dorky cultist leader. or maybe i do.
nobunnyatall 5 months ago
One of the best instrumental-parts ever in the middle of the song....!
GenesisAfterglow 5 months ago
Being a 30 year plus Genesis fan, I have to weigh in on this video-posting. IMHO, I think is a very fine version of this Genesis classic. Phil's small but poignant vocal inflections added to his physical demonstrations only ADD to the musical majesty that is the Genesis brand...ok, I'm done...whew !
urlord24 6 months ago 2
THE best "after-gabriel" song
waltergirao 6 months ago 9
@waltergirao Totally agreed!!
alnetworks2010 2 months ago
@waltergirao Been a fan for thirty years and you are absolutely right on! This one's up there over all
wong2b 1 month ago
@waltergirao The best after-Gabriel song would be Home By The Sea/Second Home By The Sea imvho.
karlmoles65 1 month ago
@karlmoles65 no it's this one or Ripples
Kruegerisgod 1 month ago
@Kruegerisgod Nah, I stick by my statement, though Ripples is excellent as well.
karlmoles65 1 month ago
Wll, for starters I thought that Phil sang it with more clarity and emotion in the studio. I didn't like the electronics that Chester used (they were in their infancy in thsoe days) at the begining of the instrumental passage in the middle of the song. It's just little things and I realize I'm being picky, but for me it just flows much better and carries more emotional weight on record than live.
stevedrums 7 months ago
@stevedrums You should hear that piece of music on "second´s out" and you should have seen the show, wehn "seconds out" was made... I hardly cried that much ance again!
deirfgeisllots 6 months ago
@deirfgeisllots If there was a tour of theirs that I could have gone back in time to see it would have been that one. However, I was only 7 at the tiem and my older brother was a 'Dead Head'!
stevedrums 6 months ago
@stevedrums Understood. ;)
kamwrites 4 months ago
The live version of this song was one of the few songs that they did that never captured the studio version.
stevedrums 7 months ago
@stevedrums Why do you think that?
kamwrites 7 months ago
@stevedrums
Some of the 1977 live versions of One for the Vine are better than the studio. One for The Vine, 1/2/77 Rainbow Theatre is better than the studio version.
yesshows100 2 months ago