Ha! I expected this to be bad, based on some of the comments of the music and what not, but I thought it was great! I would have loved to have heard some nice two-stroke airplane engines, but that was cool! Sheesh, most people put noise made by idiots yelling the same three words over and over on their videos these days... Goes to show you that often times the commenters are the morons, rather than the posters.
love it. I dont care what they think its a joke. geez lightn up people. nice flying video dude!!! oh where can i find a pod that goes on the front for an mx2? to make it semi-enclosed.
whut ?! Near miss ?! go to hell with your fucking ultralight aircraft... you guys think your so hot going 60 knots.. WoW wath out your gonna blow your engine..
F-ing ultralights! You guys as well as hot air balloons are a menace to the skies.
Always flying where you aren't suppose to be, (are you honestly buzzing around under an approach path? What is going through your head? Anything? Probably just whistling air between your ears right?)
You should all have your licenses revoked for stupidity.
@shane71880 you don't need any sort of license to fly an aircraft that is light enough to fit in the "Ultralight" catagory
FAR Part 103.7 Section "B" Notwithstanding any other section pertaining to airman certification, operators of ultralight vehicles are not required to meet any aeronautical knowledge, age, or experience requirements to operate those vehicles or to have airman or medical certificates.
I'm not sure, but this looks like two different film clips put together. The two aircraft in the video match each other with their movements within the frame as the camera was shaking. Do to parallax error, the further away aircraft(jet) should be steadier than the closer one~ similar to how the moon follows your car while you drive, but the trees pass quickly in front of you. The two aircraft are shaking equally. Case solved...
My friend was flying a King Air 200 on approach into Atlanta. She got caught in the vortices of a heavy in front of her. It spun the King Air around in a loop, but they managed to recover.
First off, thats a C-17 Globemaster II, 2nd, not a near miss, not even close. At least 2000ft seperation, and 3rd if it was a near miss, meaning they were in controlled airspace, the next scene would have included goose & maverick in a pair of 16's on intercept and ID.
Yah. Remember the telephoto effect of 'fore-shortening' will make the farther plane look closer. It effects objects farther away more than objects up close. So, since it looks like about a mile, I'd stretch that even further to 1.5 miles maybe.
Ha! I expected this to be bad, based on some of the comments of the music and what not, but I thought it was great! I would have loved to have heard some nice two-stroke airplane engines, but that was cool! Sheesh, most people put noise made by idiots yelling the same three words over and over on their videos these days... Goes to show you that often times the commenters are the morons, rather than the posters.
realvanman1 3 months ago
Lol you haters
TheChickeneer 7 months ago
I lol'd
Hondaridr58 8 months ago
Well the uploader never said it was close! Give him a break!
sgsawant 10 months ago 4
Looks like fun... I am pretty sure that was a C-17 though.... Who cares.... it's fun to be up there with the big boys either way.
Mr67Stang 1 year ago
@Mr67Stang
nah its a C-5 there are no winglets and you can kinda see the double boogie MLG too.
Cntbtouched135 11 months ago
great shooting, great music. did it bother you when you saw the shadow?
framed30 1 year ago
I don't get it. What's the big deal? Jaws music, an ultralight, and a C5 off in the distance.
51Taco 1 year ago
love it. I dont care what they think its a joke. geez lightn up people. nice flying video dude!!! oh where can i find a pod that goes on the front for an mx2? to make it semi-enclosed.
Ghillie334 1 year ago
That's not a near-miss, it's a far-miss.
nocalsteve 1 year ago
Lol. Nice music
NateTheGreatPilot 1 year ago
JAWS music lol
chris5812341234 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
near miss my ass. and your mother's.
bitemysausage 1 year ago
was that supposed to be close? u motherfucking bandwidth waster
Ravsta0612 1 year ago
HA HA agreed great Music and the fact you could have flow the ultralite THROUGH that C-5's cargo bay
usselliot76 1 year ago
This is a very bad title!! Not unlees the c5a is a model airplane or that is one giant MX!!!
DUROBATICS 1 year ago
that was not close at all. if the ultralight was close it would have been wadded up by the wake turblance!
discombobulated90 1 year ago
that was not near the jumbo jet.
yousuck705 1 year ago
wouldnt wanna go through his wake in an ultralight
bobistheman02 1 year ago
Zoinks Scoob! that was way too close! :p
bronco8585 1 year ago
I blame the niggers.
Trehugindrtlvr 1 year ago 2
haha they've got about 3k ft vertical there, nothing like a near miss.
gmcnorton 2 years ago
That's a near miss? I don't think so.
DougDaCosta 2 years ago
Travis AFB for ya...Fail on the Near miss...
flyer737sw 2 years ago
i need one of those ultralights!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bbbrotman 2 years ago
Thanks for the joke!!!!!! I laughed as I looked at the other comments . Nice try you did get me and 37,548 others to watch your vid keepposting.
findleyj1969 2 years ago
FAIL
BQZip01 2 years ago
The Eggler, your comment was ball bouncingly funny
DarthDamoss 2 years ago
that grey airplane in the background. I think it was either C-17 or C-5 Galaxy
neowarrior1 2 years ago
im surprised the trigger happy usaf didnt shoot them down
gemandste1 2 years ago
Seriously? Trigger happy?
JPH1786 2 years ago
Comment removed
shane71880 2 years ago
@gemandste1 IF THE USA WAS TRULY TRIGGER HAPPY THE TWIN TOWERS WOULD STILL BE STANDING
shane71880 2 years ago
thay have radio and thats not close.
vladislav0000 2 years ago
No where near, and 'Jumbo Jet' is the nick name for a B747!!
FAIL FAIL FAIL!!! :S
avizarob 2 years ago 2
i think i was closer to that plane watching it on my laptop.... stupid music too....
TheEggler 2 years ago 11
hahaha superb!! you made me laugh man!! love it
DarthDamoss 2 years ago
are you frigging kidding me dipshit?
mtatkinson79 2 years ago
Denver?
gabeuop79 2 years ago
not even close
harrybone747 2 years ago 2
fail
crazedGram 2 years ago
whut ?! Near miss ?! go to hell with your fucking ultralight aircraft... you guys think your so hot going 60 knots.. WoW wath out your gonna blow your engine..
MarcosTheGreat1984 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
go fuck yourself immelman you PUSSY!!!
RadiantSynergy 2 years ago
there is no uae of that language!!!!!
coolharry1236 2 years ago 2
F-ing ultralights! You guys as well as hot air balloons are a menace to the skies.
Always flying where you aren't suppose to be, (are you honestly buzzing around under an approach path? What is going through your head? Anything? Probably just whistling air between your ears right?)
You should all have your licenses revoked for stupidity.
theimmelman 2 years ago
Yeah! And no transponder either! TCAS is worthless...
blomm1 2 years ago
True, but would that ultralight could fly into the engines and not touch the sides!! XD
No one would ever know..
texNoz 2 years ago
"...You should all have your licenses revoked for stupidity...."
They already have, that's why they're flying ULTRALIGHTS!! Two things you don't need to fly ultralights.. A license or brains.
texNoz 2 years ago 2
tex you could not have said that better
crash2161 2 years ago
@texNoz you do need a license to fly ANY MANNED AIRCRAFT IN THE USA
shane71880 2 years ago
Comment removed
shane71880 2 years ago
I didn't say anything at all about LSA I made mention of ULTRALIGHTS and they are in a different catagory all together.
Any true part 103 ultralight requires NO LICENSE to fly.. Do your homework before correcting me please.
texNoz 2 years ago
Very true.
ejlister 2 years ago
Ultralights aren't classified as aircraft
ejlister 2 years ago
@shane71880 you don't need any sort of license to fly an aircraft that is light enough to fit in the "Ultralight" catagory
FAR Part 103.7 Section "B" Notwithstanding any other section pertaining to airman certification, operators of ultralight vehicles are not required to meet any aeronautical knowledge, age, or experience requirements to operate those vehicles or to have airman or medical certificates.
tehcurti 1 year ago
@tehcurti ok thanks for the info I misunderstood thanks for the info now Im getting one
shane71880 1 year ago
that plane was around 10000ft. above you
jackgrocks 2 years ago 2
lol
jammy41 2 years ago
sorry but thats not even close to a near miss
2ctrain 2 years ago 2
wow..
very close..
very close indeed..
haha
mackyboyEMO 2 years ago
that is not fake i know fake when i see it
AeroSpaceBoy130 2 years ago
dudadudadudadudadudadudaDUDADUDADUA DADADADA!
Basher86 2 years ago
WOW! That was close. Probably within 2 miles. HaHa.
KennethMixson 2 years ago
nowhere near close
therealrene 2 years ago 3
I agree. Thats normal seperation. A mile or two.
navyocs 2 years ago
Where did you get the soundtrack?Airport??
incheon 2 years ago
i think it Jaws
mightynimbus 2 years ago 2
Think so to
rcairpower 2 years ago
Now Dougal, these cows are small, these cows are far away.
bm124 2 years ago
Cheesy enough?
JSMCPN 2 years ago
dude he would have blown u right out of the sky
gobuzzrobotics 2 years ago
GEE!!! That was really close---NOT!!!!!!!
b747guy 3 years ago
:)))) This shark-type song was nice :D Great aircrafts!
VodkaFanClub 3 years ago
very very funny almost dyeing from laughing. kkkkkkkk
ezbolor 3 years ago
That is a C-17, but a neat video I like how the pilots come back around.
hawk2100n 3 years ago
lol the song is so funny with this weird vid.. um...
vietkid4life253 3 years ago
uhh if that was a RC C-5 you would have been close but thats not RC you were separated by about 1000ft-4000ft
USAFThunderBirdsFtw 3 years ago
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha........
trickybloke 3 years ago
wtf
biijayk 3 years ago
Not interesting at all.
adc103051 3 years ago
not even close
evo9forlife 3 years ago 2
that is not a near miss.
nice try!
bullcurr 3 years ago
lol jaws
Guitargod4ever45 3 years ago
people its so obvios what happened Ultralight Aircraft
nasa9boy 3 years ago
I get it the 747 took a shit on the Ultralight Aircraft
nasa9boy 3 years ago
I though ultralights can fly only 3 feet high.
nasa9boy 3 years ago
funny.. I got the joke...
redwolf28386 3 years ago
I'm glad somebody did!
CaptStacey 3 years ago
Not even close..
journeystarr 3 years ago
cool vid i'd love a go of one of those ultralight things
cthomson23 3 years ago
Zzzz
CharlieSlater 3 years ago
They were like 300 meters away at least.
driftability 3 years ago
geez its not event that close
ssaamm3322 3 years ago
You were at like 1500 feet where the jet was at 7000-10000. Nowhere close. Good try though.
agentfazexx 3 years ago
lol looks like they are flying together
Renard380 3 years ago
Lol jaws music xD
ryanmountford123 3 years ago
FINALLY! Someone with a sense of humor!!!
Chester40 3 years ago
for real..anyone who know jackshit about planes know s that those planes were far apart....it was obviously a joke, i found it entertaining
sl3shredder 3 years ago
Those aren't planes!!! except the c-5
tayloreasley 3 years ago
hey could you send me the music? thanks! great video!
hyper4lifedude 3 years ago
OMG IF TEH PLANE WAS LIKE 2000 FEET CLOSER IT WUD HAVE CRASHER TEH ROXXXOR n00b!!!!!! OMFG deh l33t skillz m0f3 :O:O:O 8-(
digitalpunk006 3 years ago
I'm not sure, but this looks like two different film clips put together. The two aircraft in the video match each other with their movements within the frame as the camera was shaking. Do to parallax error, the further away aircraft(jet) should be steadier than the closer one~ similar to how the moon follows your car while you drive, but the trees pass quickly in front of you. The two aircraft are shaking equally. Case solved...
ericcme 3 years ago
thats what i was thinking...
cmsl1993 3 years ago
I'm going to turn you into the FAA. How's that for humor? Just kidding. ?? hahahaha!
ericcme 3 years ago
My friend was flying a King Air 200 on approach into Atlanta. She got caught in the vortices of a heavy in front of her. It spun the King Air around in a loop, but they managed to recover.
tpmunyon 3 years ago
First off, thats a C-17 Globemaster II, 2nd, not a near miss, not even close. At least 2000ft seperation, and 3rd if it was a near miss, meaning they were in controlled airspace, the next scene would have included goose & maverick in a pair of 16's on intercept and ID.
DrumminJ219 3 years ago
First off, Goose & Mav flew in the same jet, 2nd, not in 16's but in 14's.
Chester40 3 years ago
OMG, get your facts straight before you post anything, it is definately a C-5 and not a C-17, and by the way a C-17 is a globemaster 3 not 2!
troybut 3 years ago
waow how cool is that!
xxtalitha 3 years ago
not very, the C-5 was A mile away at closest, if it had been a near miss the slipstream of the C-5 would have ripped the Ultralites to pieces.
kdraper2007 3 years ago
jeay you have a point.
xxtalitha 3 years ago
Yah. Remember the telephoto effect of 'fore-shortening' will make the farther plane look closer. It effects objects farther away more than objects up close. So, since it looks like about a mile, I'd stretch that even further to 1.5 miles maybe.
geob01 3 years ago
Zactly!
Chester40 3 years ago
a 2000m near miss
strop001 3 years ago
doesnt look like a near miss 2 me no where near
alkoalkoalko 3 years ago
Where was this taken? To me looks like its near Perris California...
JLangevin 4 years ago
YA ITS PERRIS.. OR MARCH AIR FORCE BASE
DUBK53 3 years ago
CRAZY!!! But is really?
nible88 4 years ago