The right origin of Indoeuropeans and their Y-DNA

[freoltic]

The father of Europe are not the roman or the greek but the german civilisation, the Frank specialy, Charlemagne who united all Europe with the kingdom. The greek and the roman are never united Europe, but slave the mostly people.

[freoltic]

So stop to think that the great civilisation are greek or roman because it's not true, the most influenced civilisation in Europe are the German civilisation and it's true again today, all the castel, the church, the law come from german civilisation. we have a few heritage of greek and roman civilisation today but an huge heritage of german civilisation in Europe. Who are the babarian today ? European or middle east ?

[freoltic]

all blond have one ancestor, who carry the Y haplogroup R1A. So, R1A are scythian, so indo-european, so yes the indo-european are blond and they are not the only, R1B too are indo-european, so no the greek and roman indo-european are not brown but blond

[DCFunBud]

Save us the drama. 

[Svarustar]

En génétique humaine, l’haplogroupe E (M96) est un haplogroupe du chromosome Y.

Il est l'haplogroupe le plus commun en Afrique, où il serait apparu il y a environ 50 000 ans.

Cet haplogroupe se retrouve surtout en Afrique, au Proche-Orient mais également en Europe du Sud à des fréquences plus faibles.

***

And, anyway, all civilizations was born by black people ))) So, should we be dishonored by our white face )_)))))))))))))))))))))))

[Svarustar]

You are not Romans or Greeks of Aristotel and Cicero times anymore... They were real aryans - high and white... Only through the centuries they have became like semitic nations... Romans was blond  before V c. BC... With itegration processes of empire the true face of Rome have changed...

***

And, anyway, all civilizations was born by black people ))) So, should we be dishonored by our white face )_)))))))))))))))))))))))

[Svarustar]

His empire was bogger then Roman's empire.. ))) And remember Holy Rome ( German ) empire under German ruling... And great Germany and week and negligible italy and always poor greece.... Why you weren't able to built strong countries? Because you are not aryans now! Only aryans are eager to make something ordered and global like COUNTRY... Italians and others were not even to be independent... And you try to explayn me, why we are barbarians... No! You've become barbaians..

[delagrazia]

@Svarustar romans were not blond Etruskans were not blond Goths reached Rome much latter in its DECLINE-only by then was holy Rome before was pagan. Have you checked the names of Roman kings? aNd later ,Byzantine kings.Eastern Roman empire lasted till 15AC when felt to the Turks and any development and art stopped(economy as well)

[Svarustar]

And if you are so stubborn, i would like to say: all civilizations was made by semitic nations and black nations at all. Then, these nations started to lag in their's development... Remember Egypt... Now, Italy and Greece is the most unhappy nations... And "Barbarians" germans give you credits and helps you to keep level of life you get used to... Everything changed... One time in history you have been graet nation... Then, in 8 centurym Karl the Great became more great...

[Svarustar]

Who is interested in Great R1a civilizations? What about Persia? It has constant history through the period of 3 00 y. at least... What about Indian great culture... Aryan culture. Remember Vedas and derived knowledge... Remember Hetts... It was times, when Romans and Greek was like barbarians for Semitic rases and Egiptians, when Persian was great nation and PErsia was great Kingdom... And also, do not remember, Romans WAS blond and bright-eyed! Learn history better!

[ancestoralmemory]

Pre-Indo-Europeans (native Europeans) were related to Semitic peoples, as they migrated from the middle east in the neolithic. The Indo-Europeans were from the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, migrated into Europe from the east but their physical presence stopped around the Rhine river; however their languages and culture continued all the way west i.e. Celts being pre-Indo-European racially, but speaking IE languages.

[NopeJPeg]

So "Europeans" are basically Asians. Makes sense as there are no "Native" Europeans. Just Central Asian immigrants.

[AjlaBosniazka]

@NopeJPeg

Native Europeans are Bosnians, haplogroup I.(30.000 years old) =first Europeans, archeologist had found runic writings in the stone in Bosnia that is 12.000 years old.

Search for video GENETICS OF BOSNIAKS

[kafirstunner666er]

@olbodala yes,,Native European r Albinos but its said they r original Armenians..now Armenians r Caucasians..sure!!

[kafirstunner666er]

the Nordic were not Indo-European..its Mediterraneans and Greeks r the indo-Europeans..Nordics r Native Europeans

[GOGesMAGOG]

@kafirstunner666er

what is the evidence to your info? coz miceneans, pelasgians, minoans had nothing with the aryan somebodies, achaj-dorians were the aryans but the kowlegdge is sumerian in Hellenicum and Etruscan in italicum, sumerians and etruscans spoke in hungarian wt hhungarian runes (Professor MArio Alinei, Michelangelo Naddeo know this)

[kafirstunner666er]

@GOGesMAGOG "Indo-Europeans" means "Indian-European" and word "Aryan" mean "Indian"..so Indo-Aryans r only Mediterraneans-Eastern European(Baltic-Ukrainians-Rus­sian) who had an Indian ancestors and same "R1A1"gene..search simply gene holograph in Google..!!

[GOGesMAGOG]

@kafirstunner666er

but we didnt have. we gave a valley civilization to indus, hephtalites, kushans, and ruled east EU as scythian, sarmatian, hun, var, hungarian, bulgar, kipcak, peceneg etc.

[kafirstunner666er]

@GOGesMAGOG nope,,search "R1b migration by Spencer" to know about migrations..

All Europeans comes from both from Middle-east (Armenians) and dark Caucasians r from India because it was ice-age few 1000s of years age :-P

[GOGesMAGOG]

@kafirstunner666er

all europeans? :) maybee all western europeans or indos. :) i know 2 hypothesises first is spencer second says west eu is aurignacian (first europeans)

[kafirstunner666er]

@GOGesMAGOG yes,,Western Europeans r Native Europeans or Nordic Europeans and all Europeans which contains R1A1 gene of Mediterraneans and East r Indo-Europeans or Indian..!!

[GOGesMAGOG]

@kafirstunner666er

r1a1 is not aryan. if you want i can send a study about fake aryan theories vs genetic.

[kafirstunner666er]

@GOGesMAGOG most Indian r R1a1..search Google "Ethnicity by countries" u will see majority of Indians indo-Aryans..as it is named by ancient people..i live in a community of Aryan race..my culture and also an Aryan religion so i know about it more than u do..send me about details of my culture..plz

[GOGesMAGOG]

@kafirstunner666er

and? it means r1a1 is from India? the early europeans were r1a1 too like the 28 000 year old sungir gravettians (our ancestors) r1a1 in india is from scythians and their later versions kusan, hephtalite , var etc.

or you are right, in present days its a question. Indian or East European?

[kafirstunner666er]

@GOGesMAGOG i know R1A1 was in India 40000 BC migrated from middle-east..later in 32000BC R1A1 was in South Western Indian coastal land were ruined..current days see Google "R1A1 holograph"

Please tell me about Mongol invasion over East Europe,Russia..??what u know about it?i heard it caused heavy lose of people and civilization over there..is it ture?

[GOGesMAGOG]

@kafirstunner666er

Its Spencer Wells THEORY, Ornella Semino have an other, which says R1a1 mutated in Ukraine. I dont know which is the right, but all scythians were r1a1 and they had pontid race, pontid were born in Northen Bank of Black Sea :) Michelangelo naddeo says Seminos theory too, they have vidences to our European origin and miggrations, i send in pm. Mongols won in 1241-1242 but we had a revenage in 1258 and 1345, 1345 attack destroyed golden horde and were born Moldova and Crimea.

[GOGesMAGOG]

@GOGesMAGOG

Moldova and Wallachia was our vassals, Crimean Tataria saved the culture, they are living in today Ukraine. Russians won vs tatars too, and were born Russian empire.

[passariskwstas]

@GOGesMAGOG The aryans are the today meditteraneans and aryans aren't blonde's.

Nords are not aryans. Aryan civillations like ancient Greek and ancient Roman called the nords barbarians.

Stop claim all of you aryan descent, do you look like Greeks and Romans?? Not because you are

just barbarian shits who your forefathers lived in caves. The descents of attila the hun aryans??? This is a joke??

[GOGesMAGOG]

@passariskwstas

Skandinavians are from Funnelbacker culture.

Rome is from Etruscan, greek is from Minoan (Sumer) civilizations. and these civilizations werent aryans but agglutinative speaker.

Attila is from MAgóg and Dulo dinasty, Dulos were Alanians, Magógs were Subartuans. Alanians had aryan blood maybee (iranians,?), Subrtuans before language trees.

[kafirstunner666er]

@GOGesMAGOG Its the Greek civilization which as the only major Aryan heritage in your European history which is indo-Aryans family..white Nordic dont have an Aryan heritage that indo-European or indo-Aryan people has but white only speaks indo-European language as they found it for whites..originally white Nordic peoples were only barbarians heritage

[GOGesMAGOG]

@kafirstunner666er

only in your dreams, minoan crete civilization was from sumer, pelasgians, miceneans were agglutinative speakers like trojans, etruscans, hungarians (sabirs), finns, turks. the human civilization is agglutinative , agglutinative language is the common language before language trees. barbarian greek word barbarus means agglutinative speaker :D

[passariskwstas]

@GOGesMAGOG Then where are the great aryan civillation's?? If Greeks and Romans weren't aryan civillations then all the theory of aryan supremacy is bullshit. You tell me that aryans were a bunch of barbarians lived in caves?? Where are the aryan power then??

[Svarustar]

@passariskwstas What the nonsense! ^))))) Romans and Greek were classic Aryans from phenotipical and genetical point of view... Also, you cann't forget about Hettians, Iranians (also Aryans )))) ) and Great Indian Aryan culture, revived dying Harrappa's civilization... Do not say that" Aryans were wild people" and so on... Learn history better. And do not forget! R1b is Y-index derived from R1a. Where is R1a there, in this video. Hahaha... Typical sense of inadequasy...

[passariskwstas]

@Svarustar Ancient Greeks had E1B1 harpogroup, romans and latins the same. Also native balkan tribes like

Thracians,illirians,Paionians had E1B1 harpogroup too. I see many north europeans called E1B1 harp middle eastern. So where are the civillations of the north europeans?? Where are the civillations of R1B,R1A??

I see only barbarian history and weak people, so blonde europeans are not aryans and true aryans from caucasus prove that, noone of them have nordic characteristics

[ancestoralmemory]

@passariskwstas Wrong, Aryans had light skin/hair/eyes. Although ancient Greece and Rome were founded and made great by Aryans, the masses were non-Aryan which is why people think of these civilizations being tanned etc. As for the north, yes Germanics certainly are of Aryan descent, and the purest still left from their Aryan ancestors. This is because northern Europe was the last Aryan realm to have mass migration from other races...

[passariskwstas]

@ancestoralmemory If aryans were light skin blondes then romans,greeks and latins weren't aryans.

After this all aryan myth will collapse, because i know that when Greeks have civillation germans and other

light skin north europeans lived in caves like animals. Aryans without Greeks and Romans are a bunch of barabrian shits

[ancestoralmemory]

@passariskwstas Like I said in my comment, the EARLY GREEK and ROMAN RULING CLASSES were Aryan even though the MASSES were not. So although you think Romans/Greeks/Latins were tanned only the MASSES were like this. I never said all were Aryans. Actually, the northern Europeans did have civilization at the same time as Greece and Rome, but it was a rural civilization and not in contact with the rest of the world.

Perhaps pay attention to detail before replying to comments.

[passariskwstas]

@ancestoralmemory Hahahahaha, you are fool man. They were aryans but the nords are not aryans, because aryans are not blonde. It was eccactly like ancient meditteranean and today meditteranean population. North europeans were barbarians like black africans

[ancestoralmemory]

@passariskwstas No, original Aryans had light pigmentation (as the Pontic-Caspian Steppe is of a high latitude). As they mixed with other populations, their offspring got progressively darker.

Ancient Mediterranean peoples were a mix of Aryans, pre-Indo-Europeans and Semites. Today they also have Turkic DNA. There is no such thing as a Mediterranean race, as they are a mix of many races. Since the Aryans were only one race, the Mediterraneans cannot be Aryans.

[GOGesMAGOG]

@ancestoralmemory

bullshit aryans were brown skinned barbarians! white race is NATIVE europen.

[passariskwstas]

@ancestoralmemory Ancient Greeks were darker skinned than north european barbarians and they doesn't mixed. Same with Romans,Persians,illirians, Latinos etc.

Noone of them had nordic characteristics. You say that they were mixed??

North european people never made great civilization, they were just blonde barbarians nothing diferent from the black barbarians from africa

[GOGesMAGOG]

@passariskwstas

yes, bt the old-greek language was agglutintive and not aryan. aryan language is from dorains, achaj, spartan.

[Svarustar]

@passariskwstas Do you mean, that children of slaves, servs, miditirrenians, descendants of mixing, are the truth aryans? This is real delirium... Where is Great Romans? They had desappeared in the melting pot of Rome Empire. And this is not a secret - nor Greek or Latinian nation are pure descendants of aryans. They are fruit of mixing with slaves and pre-indo-europeans (like in Iberia)... How eben dare you say so fullish things.... I cann't even imagin so deep ignorence and unadequasy.

[Saraswathiputra]

So,you still giving me those outdated details.So,you no modern details with you.

You only now need help!!

Read my 25th Sep2009 genetic study details which is elaborate and recent.

Verify!

[Saraswathiputra]

Not only that,we have exact details of Aryan arrival in Mediterranean and in Europe which is not more than 6000 years.So,Aryans cannot come from heaven that time as already they existing in India and no other place.

Not only that Rigveda which is placed now belonged to 6000BC exactly gives the migration Aryans from India after ten kings war with complete details of family name.

These details are wantonly suppressed with bias,also confirms that those evil minded people already know the truth!

[GOGesMAGOG]

@Saraswathiputra

indians are huns and scythians, aryans and dravidians, and native indian autochton people.

[GOGesMAGOG]

@Saraswathiputra

you must learn first, comment next! but i help you

michelangelo.cn/download/Genet­ics%20and%20the%20Aryan%20deba­te.pdf

[Saraswathiputra]

You just browse with very recent details of origin of R1a which ultimately ended in North India.

Again,the modern genetic study confirms that thee is no Aryan coming from outside and they are living in India around 40,000 years.

What is significance of this study.Aryans existing from very ancient time in India and no sign of arrival of Aryan genes from outside.Then,only answer for the Aryan genes existing outside of India is migration from India.

[gogoasacenusie]

@Saraswathiputra , Naddeo has no relevance. If you google his name you'll see nobody gives him any importance except Hungary where is some kind of superhero defending the hungarian fantastical histories. The same Naddeo thinks that Thracians were a ghost population.

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

well, the sorbonne university in paris made a test which language is the older in EU, which saved the most old eiomons we won with our 68% , Alinei says etruscan language is hungarian in 70% , kazakstan found a scythian silver dish in issyk kurgan the writing in hungarian, the sumerian jemdet nassr spoke an ancient version of which ? language? XD, the hurrian language was .... langauge. many many evidences to a mongolofinnic primitive barbarians.

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , bro....i do understand nationalism, but this is just too much....seriosly i saw on some channel about some scythian - avars - magyars - dacian continuity and it's simply just too much. It's hilarious only writing these. I'm not even saying with bad intention, it's just absurd and the international image of Hungary in the matter of history suffers because all these theories appearing year after year....Think what you want but try not to let nationalism overwhelm rational judgement..

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

the slavic chronicles says (kijevan rus wasnt anti romanian or nationalist magyar) volohs came after slovenians. some "hungarian" big head say volohs were franks XD in my opinion they were romanians. and after volochs came the white ugors next pechenegs and black ugors. slavs before the dacians? :) we have nothing to dacian past like you, im waiting Naddeos evidence. my theory is the daha-dacian, tochar-thracian same and the golden rings which you fnd in dacians and sarmatians

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , i don't believe that man. For example, the Strategikon of Kekaumenos writes that Vlachs from south are "Dacians and Bessi" who fleed from Romans. Plus you can see even today Romanians with the national folk port identical to the Dacian one. There are even Dacian folk dances like "Calusari" under Unescu heritage which again you can find at Romanians today....or the Dacian specific mountain house construction again you can come and see them in Romania.... You understand my point?

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , let me explain you why "blak" is accepted as coming from "Blakhos" and means Romanians. Please take a look on HungaryHistory (.) com:

"The Greek word Blakhos, - of Southern Slavic origin, designates Rumanians."

hungarianhistory(.)com/lib/chk­/chk05(.)pdf

And point number 2 is that the Oguzname chronicle ( an old Turk chronicle ) reffers to this population as "Balak" and as being Latin and christian....Of course we can further related with the archeological settlements..

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

vlachos means nomadic sepherd in greek , bulak means spring flower in karluk . and you are a dj who mixed these words. the romanian propagandist made vlachs from karluk bulaks XD you are vlachos , vlach, wallach, wolloch, voloch, oláh, in ancient chronicles.

karluks are bulaks, ask an uyghur what means this word " bulak" if you dont believe it me.

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , oh and almost forgot. If you're interested about the Dacian-Daha possible connection you can read here:

romanianhistoryandculture(.)we­bs(.)com/daciansdahae(.)htm

It's very rich in info. You'll also see in the right of the page many interesting subjects. I didn't even knew that page existed lol

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

hhaha bad title coz you are not dacians, or if you are dacian where is your evidence? :) you are voloh, vlach, oláh, wallachian balkanian sepherd - balknaian slav mixture first , cuman, pecheneg, uze mixed later.

Basarab was cuman too. Like Hunyadis father (Vajk) or king Stephen was Vajk too.

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , well, if it makes you feel good, you can believe what you want dude. You see? It even rhymes lol

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

dacian-daha same is a hypothesis only but have more evidence like the daco-vlach XD

name same and the golden ring spirals. Hungarian runes in Poiana vase (dacian).

XDXDXDXD

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , "vlach" is an exonym buddy, not an ethnicity.....Romanians still wear today identical Dacian clothes like a millenium ago and still have same dances ( Calusari, hora etc ) and still make same mountain house construction etc It's really futile effort to deny it, which is unfortunately happening only in Hungary....We both know that Hungarians = Dacians it's a joke there is not even a point in arguing it...neither arguing someone who posts genetical videos and then "XDXDXD" stuff.....

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

Hungarians are not dacians we are hun-ogur sabir-magyar mixtures, but we have more common with the dacians like you. Piana runes, golden rings, and the territory. Old Europe is the place of agglutinative language, runes, which is hungarian. And our contacts with the etruscans from The Basin too. Trypillia, (Cucuteni), vinca are our ancestors not the dacians.

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , you do realize you are contradicted by your own HungarianHistory website lol

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

what is your opinion but hungarian-etruscan sames? and about latin identity like they are etruscan-italic mixtures?

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , why do you want my opinion since you don't care or even read the comments or sources i give you?

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

please answer to theme. why says Mario Alinei that etruscans were hungarians? he was the president of european language associaton! he is not nobody :)

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , my opinion? If you even consider taking seriosly Alinei or Naddeo then the whole indo-european invasion history would have to be re-written which is obviously a joke.

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

Etruscan-hungarian contact was the question , not the indo aryan bullshit!

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , it would literally change entire European history and the most insane part of it is that Hungarians would have basically give birth to proto-latin! It's an imbecility just like denying that Scythians and Parthians are Iranic people...

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

you dindt answer my question again. :) the etrucan - hungrian sames are evidences not hypothesises.. with many fake and right answers. I can read their vases about trojan stories :) Etruscans were trojans. Trojans were a prt of a big agglutinative speaker old-european, Middle Eastern high civilization like we scythians.

Iranians werent scythians, write to google this: issyk kurgan wikipédia. you will see our runes, i can read too. With some joined Aladins on flying carpet :)

[GOGesMAGOG]

@GOGesMAGOG

but what is your personal opinion of etruscan hungarian sames?

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , buddy....in any history book from this planet, in any serious historical circle Scythians = Iranians just like Parthians or Medians. I have read Alinei and i p.m-ed with Naddeo on youtube. I still have his messages and in one he says that i should accept the Hungarian ancestry of Romanians and i can still be proud of Decebal as our hero LOL. This is pure insanity i don't know if there are organizations who pay people to invent such stuff...Believe what you want..

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

yes. only in the books! and in the reality is a nationalist german propaganda from 19th century.

if you have not own opinion about hungarian etruscan sames you are primitive!

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , yeah im a primitive like the propagandists from NEMETorszag lol

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

no, only you are tipical common people, brainwashed who dont see the evidences and dont looking for that!

scythians were aryans spoke in iranian bip bip, and where is the evidence? nothing but all books write this! bip bip. and when some poor russians found an evidence to their language, everybody is silent.

issyk kurgan silver dish scythian stele from kazakstan, found it in 1969. is not aryan, not iranic, not romanian and hungarian :) if have you book, if you dont.

[GOGesMAGOG]

@GOGesMAGOG

we have many sames to many cultures (peru too LOL)

1. we are ufos who made all human civlizations

2. we saved common things from a common world. common world before language trees bc 3000.

we saved the common language in 68%, common runes in 68%, common religions, common genes, other folks lost that, not all things every folks saved some commo nthings too.  the türks saved the common language in 25%, the aryans in 5%

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , and let me guess. Those ancient drawings from Indian caves with the beings with big heads and big eyes coming "from the skies" are proto hungarians right? Hmm....it's a looong distance to Zeta Reticulli buddy...

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

no we are the vinca aliens...

LOL the first europeans are the aliens hm...

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG ,

arcturi(.)com/AncientAliens/An­cientCavePaintings(.)html



[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

you are an alien Xd gogosuckernurse XD

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , and by the way, we are aliens since life on Earth most probably came from outside our planet....the word "alien" is very ambiguous

[GOGesMAGOG]

gogo gogo you will hang yourself XD Decze Béla was hungarian daha!! :D

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , and you are Lady Gaga. Admit it.

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , by the way did you know that Prince Charles recently said he's the descendant of Romanian Vlad Tepes ? Hear him say it in this new trailer of "Wild Carpathia"

/watch?v=ip_QZaBfXqM

Isn't that interesting :)

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

its your opinion about the etr-hun sames? :D

Dacian origin, expansion, migrations:

Dacians were Dahas came to Carpathia in BC 1500, from N.-East bank of Caspian sea.

To Caspia from Sumer BC 3000.

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

I forgot my question, what is your theory to etruscan -hungarian sames? XDXDXD

[gogoasacenusie]

@GOGesMAGOG , my theory is that etruscan-hungarian similarities are complete non-sense based on vague similarities and tones of nationalism. And you know why "my theory" actually has a point? Because Alinei or Naddeo don't go mainstream and have no relevance to any academical medium....But it's of course a fertile ground for nationalist hmmm...wackos? Pretty much it's like a big mental masturbation....

[GOGesMAGOG]

@gogoasacenusie

you must check the infos, i wrote thet bulaks werent romanians but karluk türks you didnt belive that, i asked an uyghur what means he says bulak=spring flower oops. ask an uyghur, looking for evidences and dont bleieve it to Naddeo , me or judeo-romanians too.

[freoltic]

@Askar590 all R1B was speak an indo-european language, that's why Armenians and kurds speak an indo-european language like probably assyrian too. Because R1b in middle east is rare but not J who come from yemen or soudan. But R1b is curren in anatolian who are probably the first agricultor who have invaded Western Europe

[Saraswathiputra]

My dear,centum and satum are bull shts and wont stand before reliable genetic study.

Dont show your foolish egoistic knowledge!

Instead,update your knowledge!

[Armador]

Search Circassians - otonkton people of the caucasus-Maykop Culture(R1b1b2a)

[GOGesMAGOG]

@Sociolog26

no, german runes have agglutinative past, so uralaltaian languages. funnelbaker culture:)

[TheHunpower1]

Good video!

[SabaeanYared]

thank you

[Saraswathiputra]

How modern archeology is fake.It is your knowledge is fake!

All modern genetics and archeology confirms the Indian origin of Aryans.

These are most authentic!

Ask me,I will provide details.

Verify yourself.

[GOGesMAGOG]

@Saraswathiputra

which genetic marker originated in india?

[freoltic]

@Saraswathiputra so if R1a come from india, R1b and R2 come from india too. can you prove it please

[tombry76wawa]

Indoeuropean R1B? What is it? There isnt r1b in India. Only r1a.

[GOGesMAGOG]

@tombry76wawa

the genetic study is young. its a theory which good to artifcts too. and r1a1 ws hight in horseridding cultures and hurrians. these folks now ural-altaic speakers and half aryan-half suffix speaker iranians.

[Saraswathiputra]

Indo-Europeans aka Aryans were originally from Arya Vartha of ancient North India.These are all confirmed by modern genetics and archeology.Why people still publishing those last century concocted lies,I dont know!!

Still,for many people lies are needed to carry forward their agenda!!

[GOGesMAGOG]

@Saraswathiputra

nobody know were was arya. i know minimum 5 theories aryan vedic areas, caucasus, east eu steppe, iran, near east XD. mostly evidences are fakes stole from turanian sumaro-subar or scythian past..

[fuckturks2223]

@GOGesMAGOG scythians were iranian idiot

another magayar propogandist?

your people came to europe about 1300 year´s ago

[freoltic]

@Saraswathiputra you are wrong way, the centum is more old than satem, do you know what does it meane ? the first indo-european are R1B, not R1A

[SabaeanYared]

so, R1b are the indo-european agriculturalists....then I1a are the germanic/scandinavians who descend from hunter-gatherers?

[GOGesMAGOG]

@SabaeanYared

identity and language from the ruler class, dna (language some nations) are from common people. I1 native skandinavian, r1b1b2a ruler aryan marker. the runes are from native skandinavians, not from aryans they didnt can write.

[asoneonline]

@GOGesMAGOG .."they didn't can write" for sure that you are aryan :D ..buddy, the 1st and 2nd indo-european homelands are not too far from vhere you wish them to be.. but, unfortunate for you, there are sciences that locate migrations somewhere else.. ;) All one can see is frustrated political bs.

[CeltzKrieg]

@asoneonline

The frustrated political bs emanates from todays mainstream media. Just like they have lied about global warming, they are marxist liars fitting and publishing PC 'all races are the same' lies. Not to mention not publishing facts that throw more doubts on the out of africa theory. The mainstream academics are mostly leftists with an agenda. They will lie and cover up findings and twist their results, they have done it before.

[GOGesMAGOG]

@SabaeanYared

funnelbacker culture, was I1. from Gravettian I. they were the first inhabitants in Skandinavia.