Added: 3 years ago
From: beaston7272
Views: 1,304
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • mathematically: was it a correct call with ten 9 offsuited?

  • Whoa!

    Runner runner straight with only a 49% pre-flop winning percentage and only a 36% winning percentage heads-up against with the AQo.

    See, this is an example of what blows about no-limit texas hold'em. When you get hurt, it hurts BAD!

    And when hands like this happen online, forget about! You really start to question whether online poker sites are rigged.

    LOL!

    No-limit hold'em clearly equals bowel-liquifyingly high variance! ;D

  • hahaha...

    "No-limit hold'em clearly equals bowel-liquifyingly high variance! ;D "

    That is the best description I've ever read...and it's so true..lol

  • You wrote:

    >> btw 9T was only 37% preflop and 6% post...:P

    Actually, it's 36%-37% pre-flop going up heads-up with the AQo.

    But I was saying if you DIDN'T know the other guy was holding AQo, it WOULD be 49% pre-flop for the guy holding 9To.

    And, of course, it's 6% post-flop. Trust me. We're using the same calculator. ;)

  • 10 9..idiot

  • WOW, MAN... this was a great one......

    unbelievable.

  • just imagine if would have been PHIL HELLMUTH!

    I would loved to watch that,.....

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more