THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas 3/8:Jason Debunk's National Geographic & No Planes BS!

[drifter402]

Actually 911 coincidences proves how they got in

[soulinite]

watch?v=E1FTx-PhW_s

[StageMan]

National Geographic gets federal funds as a reasonably healthy part of their budget. If our Rogue Government Employees contacted that CEO of National Geographic , in what ever way...and told him or her that they were to perform this experiemnt and how they were going to perform it and if they didn't do it exactly as they were instructed...National Geographics funds would be cut , not only the federal dollars but also the Endowment Funds or even worse. What would you do... If you were the CEO ?

[300Z31]

Again I say, Rosie O'Donnel(sp) said "...this would be the first time in history that fire has ever melted steal." Look it up Bermas.

[MrNagrom007]

all of you who don't belive bermas and jones will belive them when martial law is declared and you are on your way to a fema camp. look at the law's there passing all the fema camps i am saddened by all the people who belive the out for our best intrest LOLgovernment is looking . welcome to club fed!!!!!

[thedman113]

"all of you who don't belive bermas and jones will belive them when martial law is declared and you are on your way to a fema camp."

When's that going to happen exactly? Because you dorks have been saying it's coming for years, yet somehow I'm still in my house.

[D00DLESTHECLOWN]

Dude's full of shit and looks like hee-haw gone hip-hop too.

[EvanQuinn07]

AssHoles like bermastein and jonesberg are laughing their asses off at all you Suckers out there that beleive this BullShit..lol another example of sleezy jews playing a con-game...lol

[1THETRUTH10]

kjdftgyuhijoklp

[1THETRUTH10]

Then it was a pointless test!

[EdgemanLLZ]

Bermas is a cocksucking moron parrotting every opinion that Alex has.

[samisnake]

i like jason burmas, but watching this video, i cant take my eyes off of his horse teeth

[EdgemanLLZ]

Thousands of centcom liars cannot change the truth.

Believe me,we will try.

We are quite mad idiots.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

[thedman113]

Seriously, you've spent many hours of your life creating and posting a shill account? That would be hilarious if it weren't so sad.

[EdgemanLLZ]

You have more than me boy!

[suicidechickenshit]

Watch what you say on thealexjoneschannel! I LOVE Alex Jones but I must have made a critical comment that the authoritarian master of that channel (not Alex) didn't like. He blocked me from commenting and subscribing. What a micromanaging douchebag extraordinaire this guy is! But I don't mind being blocked by an misguided Alex fan who thinks it's appropriate to use the same control freak methods that fascist dictators use on those who constructively criticize them. Jason you and Alex rock!

[isair81]

At some point, you've got to look beyond the events of 9/11 and realize what's happend since.

The world changed after 9/11, and not for the better, how many innocent lives have been lost due to the so called "Global War On Terror" ?

All over the world governments are passing draconian anti-terror laws that take away or diminish civil liberties..

Even if the official version is 100%accurate it is certainly true that it was used as a new pearl harbor to push the old dream of a "New World Order."

[ScorpiusIncorruptus]

So, the beem that is being used here is NOT to scale in it's thickness? THAT would make much sense to me...

[delta9cbd]

ScorpiusIncorruptus:

No, its NOT any where NEAR to scale. The steel I-Beam in the Nat Geo Mockumentary is TINY in comparison to the steel used in the WTC's.

Besides, in the WTC's there were no 'reservior' full of jet fuel placed directly under completely unprotected steel. In the WTC's jet fuel would've burned off in minutes in my opinion.

Bottom line, the beam used in the test was PATHETICALLY thin/small in dimensions and weight.

[311ftw]

thedman, its that notalk connection between bermars n his audience, things go without saying between them.lol.

he would catch a bullet if he pulls a jfk.lool,jk.

bermars cant think for himself, its just the teleprompter.

[311ftw]

lol,if you check my page, youll see theres anti aj vids.

ajthamutt, yes aj is ok for a start.

but you gotta look further yourself, because aj wont or cant talk about the real juicy stuff.

note how he NEVER provides solutions.

just *buy my movie*.

his movies are worthless cutnpaste tv archives collection+loud redneck voice.

never a solution.

you know2avoid vaccine legally?i do.

[thedman113]

First twoofers say steel cannot be affected by a hydrocarbon fire. Now that they have been proven wrong, they complain the SIZE of the steel used was too small. Wait a minute Jason, I thought steel couldn't be weakened by fire PERIOD! Are you backtracking now?

[TrueGreatness73]

steel can tip the top part by fire but cant collapse the building in a straight vertical motion like the WTC. Thats what he said. You don't have any interpretation skills.

[thedman113]

"steel can tip the top part by fire"

That doesn't even make sense. But anyway, you seem oblivious to the fact that twoofers like Bermas have been shouting for years that steel is not affected by hydrocarbon fires. So why after the Discovery Channel proved otherwise does he now backtrack and complain about the size of the beam? I noticed 3 people read that question the last time I asked it, but they could only offer an anonymous thumb down, and couldn't even try to actually answer it.

[TrueGreatness73]

lol, Discovery channel prove otherwise? It was on NatGeo & they didn't prove anything & by u saying that shows me your trying to own this argument with no evidence to support your claim. Nothing was proved. EMERTC conducted those BS studies which makes it completely bias. The government owns them. Thats like a murderer doing a investigation on himself, it dont make sense. If the government didn't do it then who did? Bush already admit (ON TAPE) that middle East had nothing to do with it.

[thedman113]

"they didn't prove anything"

They proved that steel can be affected by hydrocarbon fires, did they not?

"EMERTC conducted those BS studies which makes it completely bias."

Yes, it was BIAS that made that steel beam give way, not heat from a fire. Bias. Excellent insight.

[TrueGreatness73]

Are you saying they correctly reenacted the events of the WTC?

Your not too bright if you think they reenacted 911.

I bet if EMERTC' said that it would be ok for you to drink gas you and millions of other Americans would be dead by tomorrow. The media owns you. Your just a lab rat waiting to die. We got people ready to fight for whats theirs (me) and ppl who is going to be dumb, scared and that will run and hide(you). Good job idiot.

[thedman113]

Nope, I'm saying they proved hydrocarbon fires could weaken steel. Quite trying to put words in my mouth and set up a straw man because you're unable to rebut what I actually said.

Now again: They proved that steel can be affected by hydrocarbon fires, did they not? Yes or no.

[TrueGreatness73]

WTF does that have to do with anything you idiot?

Its "quit" not quite you dumb ass.

That doesn't prove shit you idiot.

[thedman113]

I've already told you, but I guess I'll have to explain again because you're not good at reading. One of the main tenets twoofers have been pushing for years is that hydrocarbon fires do not get hot enough to weaken steel. Nat Geo proved that wrong. THAT's what it has to do with anything.

"Your just a lab rat waiting to die."

- It's You're not your, you dumb ass.

"and ppl who is going to be dumb"

- it's who ARE going to be dumb, you dumb ass.

[TrueGreatness73]

try typing 100 words per minute and spelling errors will occur faggot. I am talking about the world trade center and your talking about Nat Geo. Next time stay on subject. 911 was on purpose by the government. fuck off loser.

[thedman113]

"try typing 100 words per minute and spelling errors will occur faggot."

Who was the one who started with the typos? And using "is" in place of "are" is not a typo, that's just bad grammar.

Back on subject: can steel be weakened by hydrocarbon fires, yes or no.

[undajun2]

The answer is: YES, it can!

Does this isolated point now discount all the anomalies concerning how fire/heat/chemical reactions effected the metals of the WTCs on 9/11?

NO! NOT AT ALL!

Do "debunkers" ever face the the full implications and conclusions simultaneously supported by various bodies of evidence as a whole?

NEVER!

They only isolate minute details and offer alternate (yet unproven) hypothesis to water them down w/o ever disproving anything!

The truth may be slowed, but not stopped

[thedman113]

"They only isolate minute details "

We talk about how both towers collapsed at the plane impact points and nowhere else, that the weight of the falling upper section far exceeded that which any floor could support, and that thermite cannot and has never been used to demo buildings, let alone keep metal molten for weeks. You talk about why a little hole appeared in a piece of steel. Who's isolating minute details?

[IndivisblePrinciple]

I dont know, I would reply, but i think i already said what i have to say.

How many individual points which also fit like a glove in relation to each other support c.demolition?

How many of them are countered by absurd, scientifically unprecedented, fanciful "maybe"s and "what if"s by debunkers?

"Isolating minute details" means isolating details from THEIR IMPLICATIONS AND THE MUTUAL BODIES OF EVIDENCE WITH THE SAME IMPLICATIONS.

It doesnt not mean one shouldnt do thorough research

-undajun2

[thedman113]

"How many individual points which also fit like a glove in relation to each other support c.demolition?"

None. They only fit if you're ignorant about basic math or physics.

"How many of them are countered by absurd, scientifically unprecedented, fanciful "maybe"s and "what if"s by debunkers?"

Only if you consider 80,000 tons weighing more than 1,300 tons to be an absurd, fanciful maybe.

[IndivisiblePrinciple]

"Ignorant about basic math and physics"

Right, so for someone to say that when 4 ton girders are hurled sideways 600 ft at 70 miles an hour, it basically shits all over your "gravity collapse theory" and makes it the fictional obsession of brainwashed retards, that means they are ignorant about basic math and physics?

Where is your head at?

Please be sensible, i have seen many of your comments now and I am hoping that one day you develop some sense and dignity and stop spewing random nonsense

[IndivisiblePrinciple]

...and here i will save you the research, I messed up on one of those numbers. The speed was closer to 50 miles an hour, not 70.

Now whether you feel that somehow makes it tenable or not, thats all on you. I think its to late at this point to try to make an appeal to your common sense....

Until next time....

remember to "debunk" safely (try not to hurt your own intelligence) ; )

[thedman113]

"Right, so for someone to say that when 4 ton girders are hurled sideways 600 ft at 70 miles an hour, it basically shits all over your "gravity collapse theory""

No it doesn't. 80 tons can throw 4 tons around like a toothpick. See, you've just proven my 'ignorant about math and physics' comment correct.

[IndivisiblePrinciple]

I guess I need to reming u that we are talking about 80 tons falling downwards towards earth, not swinging sideways like a wrecking ball. The only way that that kind of weight falling straight down could throw something 4 tons at that speed sideways at that trajectory would be, MAYBE MAYBE MAYBE, if the item being hit had some sort of elastic property. BUT a steel girder would bend under the weight & fall towards gravity, especially considering that it was being hit from above in the first place

[thedman113]

All that would need to happen is part of the falling upper section getting inside one of the column sections. It would exert tremendous lateral force on it until the section's connections broke, sending it flying outwards. The scenario is incredibly easy to visualize.

[IndivisiblePrinciple]

Even if the connections between the girders were strong enough to hold them in place long enough (while 80 tons of steel structure fell on top of them) to build up the kind of force necessary to shoot out sideways like rubber bands, the steel would start deforming & bending first.

The inevitable bending of the steel under the pressure of the continuously falling building would change the angle that the force and weight would have on them and alter the direction at which they were pushed out

[thedman113]

They didn't have to be strong at all, in fact they were broken nearly instantly. The force exerted by the falling upper section on the column sections would have been more than enough to send it flying. Goes back to that whole '80 tons can throw 4 tons around like a toothpick' thing. The scenario I outlined happened in a fraction of a second.

[IndivisiblePrinciple]

If it happened in a fraction of a sec that would mean that the girder broke off very easily, having minor contact w/ the upper block & thus falling away governed predominantly by gravity. If u say that a piece of the upper bldng became wedged in between girder beams while falling & that created lateral force, u should also consider that any wedging or intertwining between the steel from the upper & lower blocks would create gridlocking & prevent the possibility of an unimpeded lateral projectile

[thedman113]

No, it had major contact with it. Any time 80,000 tons falls on something, it's pretty major contact.

"If u say that a piece of the upper bldng became wedged in between girder beams"

That's not what I said. There weren't two rows of outer columns, it didn't become 'wedged in between' anything. It just impacted the outer column from the inside, pushing it outwards.

[EdgemanLLZ]

But it is our job to change the subject.Obfuscation,propaganda­,name calling,neurolinguistic programming,anything but facts.If we debate the facts fairly we will lose! It is our job to muddy the waters and confuse the idiots!

[311ftw]

i know.

my question was if you think bermas does it on purpose.

im affraid he actually believes what hes saying.

poor kid.

[TrueGreatness73]

Your just a dumb ass. Its a inside job. We went to war because of the 9/11 attack yet Bush later admit there wasn't a connection. Why are we still in war? Millions of ppl are dying yet you support this government when they don't give a shit about you nor your love ones. Your a closed minded lab rat & your opinion really doesn't matter

[Coenzyme911]

Dont go for that bishop.

You will loose your king.

[TrueGreatness73]

what do u mean by those chess words?

[311ftw]

you guys think bermas knows hesa shill or do you think he believes his own crap?

lol.he thinks hesa journalist with ruff gangsta talk.lol.

[311ftw]

off course all truth movements are setup by tptb.

wearechange, all jews.lol.

lol, anonymous truther isnt he the1pushing that insane advanced weapon theory ?

zero facts, very bad research.

still>alexjones

[311ftw]

i despise aj, but anonymous truther isnt exactly super trustworthy.

jesuit theory is a joke.

oboswald is shacks biggest fanboi.

simon shacks either right or insane.or both.lol.

so far, nothing against simon.

[311ftw]

jewson bermas is full of excrement,yes.

but i doubt the thermite theory.

altough i doubt all theories.

point is, america is so screwed, it dont matter , america needs a total system overthrow.

[al8397138]

wow  great debunking jason

[Coenzyme911]

Jason Bermas is a traitor.

[xXxHeinekenxXx]

how?

[Coenzyme911]

911 "truth" was created and financed by the perpetrators in order to control the outcome of information.

Alex jones is coadjutor to the rape, confusion and death of millions of people.

user/SimonShack

user/Anonymoustruther

user/OzzybanOswald

[ajthamutt]

prove it

[Coenzyme911]

Proof that bermas is a media shill:

Did you know there is less than one chance in a million of 4 simultaneous hijackings? Did you know that 911 had the 4 cleanest "crash" sites in history?

Did you know that the laws of nature were violated by "planes" that did not suffer any reaction during impact?

Did you know that the media found 10 hijackers alive? Did you know there was no cockpit voice and flight data recorders available?

[Coenzyme911]

Did you know that Flight 11 and 77 officially never existed, while Flight 93 and 175 were active until 05?

Did you know that there was not a single airplane part for independent corroboration?

Did you?

[ajthamutt]

yes i did, and i still dont see how that is evidence of him being a shill

[MCDouga11]

lol no shit

[ajthamutt]

say him and alex jones are shills. they still have brought a lot of people up to speed on the international conspiracy, they still put up with harrassment to bring you the truth. you trying to discredit them does nothing but confuse people who want the facts which jason and alex both clearly present unlike you who has done nothing. so like i said if you have REAL evidence then present it because i want the facts and unlike most of america i know who to trust

[Coenzyme911]

Are you using your brain brother?!

alex jones tells you the media had nothing to do with 911 because he is protecting the PSYOP weapon that was responsible for the attacks, and to whom he belongs!

It´s just controlled opposition subverting the truth! Divide and Conquer!

"Alex is a fucking stooge, always knew that. He was in A Skanner Darkly acting for fuck sakes."

[Coenzyme911]

watch?v=bg8Uz_R7pt4&feature=re­lated

watch?v=owIZ0I57KLk&feature=ch­annel_page

watch?v=bsKe4SZ4xIk&feature=ch­annel_page

[TrueGreatness73]

Your another dumb shit

[Coenzyme911]

You are being deceived.

Beware.

[Styles1125]

Cracked me up that the jet fuel melted the steel, but the thermite ( that burns alot hotter ) did not. Watch out for History Channel programs too... Propaganda...

[chrissarns]

The floors were held up by trusses not beams. You can see the truss at 0:41 of segment 3. That's what NIST tested. The Nat Geo experiment is not only silly but they didn't even test the right thing.

[geojoey15]

Would have been a real shame if that guy in front of the forklift at 5:02 lost his leg for ignoring a basic safety rule.

[xXJADEXx7]

The debunking from national geographics was just to give all the fluoride heads the in their minds the "checkmate" to debating truthers that actually know what they are talking about.

[virus1244]

I've lost trust in Nat Geo a while ago doing a full spread on how global warming is going to kill us and its our fault

[geojoey15]

If you don't stop breathing you're going to die.

[Mariachi153]

lmfao!

[meboboya]

was the beam on its side?

[bob733333]

national geographic is a fraud and a joke. they're so dumb it's funny.

[nephozo]

debunked!

[ZankDigiTrash]

@ tastingo88

it's a doll not a real baby

[siasina]

LOL wtf....

[playful316]

so they scaled the beam DOWN and RAISED the tempeture..Seems like they arranged the outcome to me..

[dpcfish]

As an American citizen seeking the truth I've seen nothing that would make me change my mind.

I remain part of the 81% whom question the official story.

[balutek]

/watch?v=_pwh-zCvz_Y

[regjoe30]

you guys should've gone down to a steelyard and got photos of what the real beams look like compared to the one they used. nat.geo. is a joke. if a backwater shop like the one i worked at (with 10 employees total including the owner) could handle beams the size used to build the WTC then nat.geo. sure as shit could have

[Kiddolinfen09]

The only problem is you can't air a rebuttal on National Geographic Channel... it's a one-way conversation.

[ChrisoneillART]

Good Work Jason!!! Keep it up !

[Humpahna]

Jason, don't forget that they also did their test in the middle of a friggin' desert! The WOrld Trade Center was in NewYork city in the month of SEPTEMBER!

[911PersonalityCult]

Bermas is a gatekeeper dullard pushing his long-outdated product which is nothing but pablum circa 2003. Time didn't stand still you oblivious mouthpiece.

Anybody who still thinks a plane slid past reinforced steel and concrete and then waited to explode when out of sight is maintaining the official story.

You're a fucking shill for cash. You know it and we know it.

[todzilla73]

GO JASON !!!!