Rapid Fire Grenade Launcher

[SteveAust9]

why don't they deploy that against the terrorists

[waterfox305]

I feel bad for the unlucky suckers living next to the range.. They get the newspaper and then BOOM!!!

[Evilhen88]

Practical? Maybe. Fun? Yes!

[mvallin]

i don't see how this is practical.

[zeppelin67637]

@mvallin It's always practical to blow more shit up faster!

[fergernator]

insert mw2 bs jokes for grenade launcher here

[pk1432]

@fergernator noob tubing at the speed of light. Go USA

[Rilurio]

@pk1432

Sorry to burst your bubble, but this was designed by Australian and built by australians

[MrJuddy70]

Australian tech at its deadly best ...we could use that with great effect in the south of the Stan.

[i4future]

mwhahaha Thats alot of effin grenades!!!

[wolf999679]

shit, i blinked...

cool piece though.

[UseUrHead503]

i saw this on discovery channel once, i remembered this is being fired by electricity

[ghemminger1]

@stupidboy887 but if you turn haji in to a mist at 3,000 rpm, who cares about a boom anymore?

[briani4735263]

And so, our reach overextends our grasp. When is anyone ever going to need to put that much ordnance on-target that fast? This weapon was built simply to see if it could be done, without thought to the consequences.

[ghemminger1]

@briani4735263 wrong. Say, haji and his 10 buddies are walking along a street, looking for a place to implant IEDs. This weapon engages them and takes them all out in the blink of an eye with much less collateral damage than a 500 lb LGB. So, Muhammed was sitting up on the rooftop, thinking, hey, this is good...haji is going to get those americans...then, all of a sudden, they are mist...

huge battlefield deterent...same concept for a time on target mission for an artillery battery...

[jzrdw]

@stupidboy887 40 mm grenades are much more versatile than a rpg7 style projectile. 40mm are usually HE and fragmentation, whereas the rpg7 uses and anti-vehicular cone shaped round. and to "the bigger the better", a 5.56 round is smaller than a 7.62, but it can do a lot more damage due to the tumbling in the body, doing massive damage, and has less recoil, greater accuracy and fire rate. the 7.62 has more stopping power but slower and kicks harder. its a big debate, but i prefer the .223

[Mr420pot420]

@jzrdw the rpg-7 has anti personal rounds and he

[jzrdw]

@Mr420pot420 love the name! haha little late reply huh?

[MagicalWierdo]

nade spam is gay

[ThePeturd]

when the human race can withstand 10 grenades, call in this bad boy.

[EmperorofTerra]

wtf, yo wont whipe out a whole batallion with this thing. The enemy will reach you before you have finnished with reloading.

[evnaddict]

@EmperorofTerra Then you whip out your metal storm pistols and assault rifles ;)

[EmperorofTerra]

@evnaddict hmm, that's an argument.

[evnaddict]

@EmperorofTerra Only if you perceive it to be so.

[squidb8]

@EmperorofTerra Its not meant to be taken out on ops. Its would be more useful as an Alamo defense weapon.

[grinningsphinx]

BRRAAAAPpp......trees in the distance blow up.

[Kommie4life88]

The faster the gun, hence logistic problems . If it just all about killing enemy infantry i rather go with the old school Katjiusha series:Great fire power,rate of fire and rapid deployment.

Think about it. The enemy troops is an active target and no guarantee that you can wipe them off in one go.

[SuperSonicFreak101]

this is for tanks and vehicals no troops for the reason that a grenade is to expencive to use on people.

[squidb8]

@Kommie4life88 Its a shock and awe weapon. It gives the defenders enough breathing room to actually start picking targets.

[Ciuperciuc]

And I thought 1 was enough in front of your face to deal with.

[mojk88]

yea 1musican1 is right but think of the damage you could do at the pull of a trigger to enemy infantry

[1musican1]

insane, but dont you need like 2000000 rounds of ammo to supply for like a few seconds?

[CyanideStudios]

good call...