I don't like the police any more than anyone else, but the civilian in this video is a gobby self-righteous arsehole who could at least have kept his voice down and been respectful. At least listen.
Good on you mate wish I knew the final outcome if you were searched or not but regardless the uk need more people with yourawareness of civil liberties and the bottle to stand up for them. Im not a cop hater but if we dont tell them when they cross their boundaries, who will?? Nice one.....ill put money on it you meet him again!!!!! If poss emAil me re final outcome. Thanksaw
UKBLIVE. And you also need to remember that break the law however big or small your servants will punish you. Give officers respect & they will respect you, try it sometime instead of being obstructive & abusive. Play up & the officer will do so to your level & punish you. Grow up establishment haters.
They are PUBLIC SERVANTS, the Presume YOU are too, you need to inform them that you are not a public servant and they need to do what you say. They work for you because YOU are the beneficiary of your name and they are under you and have no power
Harassment my arse. The UK police are the best in the world, never had any trouble with them, never been in the wrong place at wrong time, mistaken ID, stop searched for no reason etc.... Most posting comments on here I would guess have all of the above. Stop talking out of your bums.
keep up the good work g , used to live in st annes know babylon move up notts , its important that information is passed on through out the uk and yes they are all copporate officers , common purpose have training groups withen the police that brainwash them with NLP techniques LOOK IT UP
My only objection to this is once you say I don't want to talk to you SHUT UP! If you talk to the police long enough you will say something that can be used against you.
All Police constables swear an oath that they will protect your common law rights. They police by consent and can only detain you if they suspect you have committed an offense. You are sooooo right and the PCs are soooo wrong.
what a bitch ciber cabber none stop of course police will stop you and ask all he can
this is a new world it is complicated all british citizens lived happy for centuries without being awere of the cost of their luxory now what they cannt listen the cops ??they contributed supproted established police goverment all arround the world now they are not happy lol all the power to cops cops are for peoples liberty they are also from people dumc asses they are not space aliens they know bitches
also do you know whats sad some shit video like lady fucking gaga etc gets millions hits yet this video and others like it only get over 8k =/ the great british public are asleep and need waking up.
@shaffaaf27 So by your logic anyone with a knife should be, arrested, charged and imprisoned regardless of whether a crime has been committed. You do have one in your kitchen don't you? So you could possibly kill someone with one of your knives if you so chose. Sounds asinine doesn't it. As does your statement.
I hope these police realize that, basically, they are the instruments of terrorists. Without them and the media trying to pull this bullcrap, terrorists would have no power.
power trippin pigs with a badge..thats all they are..GOOD for you for standing your ground...These jerks need to know the law..and quit being bullies..
Who exactly are they working for? and what probable cause did they have to do any of this in in your recorded clip?
power trippin pigs with a badge..thats all they are..GOOD for you for standing your ground...These jerks need to know the law..and quit being bullies..
Who exactly are they working for? and what probable cause did they have to do any of this in in your recorded clip?
Whenever an officer significantly restrains you, it constitutes an arrest, even if he doesn’t actually mean to arrest you. If he puts his hands on you or uses any sort of force, that’s an arrest, and any significant restraint must always be supported by probable cause. Without probable cause, the officer is liable for a false arrest and any evidence gathered after that fact is inadmissible in court.
i get the same shit down here in london like every month police try to stop me for no legit reason. so my dad starts telling me about common law and such.
then just last night they stopped me again for no reason ..dad comes down with the common law and they couldnt touch me
@4uRioUs to me it seems as if london is more police state then america(and you guys claim we are further into police state than you), we don't have CCTV and the police aren't this absurd....but i would still move there just for entertainment from the police's stupidity!
•An act of Parliament (Act of parliament) is a statute (commonly called a law)? maybe it's nit picking a little. but good on u for standing up to them.
until you have claimed your right as a freeman and it is indisputable then they have the right to search you as you have consented by way of your consent to be governed imo, yet if you have filled in the appropriate paper work and are legally and lawfully classed as a freeman then every thing they have done here is an offence punishable by law and all of the rights you claimed would be in full effect
@gotknowledge1 it rhymes, so it must be true. your protest will never make a dint if you can't accept criticism, or at very least retort with witty replies
the definition of an "act" is irrelevant. consent is irrelevant. no one is above the law. if everyone said "i don't need to listen to you, i've done nothing wrong", no one would be in prison, and i'm not sure who that benefits. criminals are rarely honest. it comes with the territory
@aquariussouldier the system has never caused me to have a problem with it, but i do enjoy all this dreary matrix-esque vocab, of we're all "slaves" and to "wake up" etc... it's amazing how little these tired replies hit home. you'll have to be much more creative on the internet, there's not much room left over for over-the-top radical thought, or paranoid delusion
@alex164 If the system has never caused you to have a problem with it, then I'm genuinely happy for you. But you are in the minority. Everywhere I look I see the corruption lies smoke and mirrors being used by the controlling elite, filtering right the way down to the bottom of the (figurative) pyramid. If you are happy then go on living your life as normal and dont waste your time posting on topics like this, save that for people to whom the system HAS caused them to have a problem with it.
@aquariussouldier i appreciated that reply. i think these topics need to have a balance, and it strikes me that impressionable minds are reading this stuff and thinking there is a problem with a country that i 100% believe is the absolute best in the world regarding both its freedom, and its police service, and i will always feel the need to speak up in support of it
@alex164 It's good to have different views peacefully :) That in itself can be a rarity! I guess, with regards to the issues we are speaking of, it is down to the individual to look at the facts on both sides and make up their own mind. If we dont have our own mind, we have nothing. The wisdom of experience, or second hand beliefs! Thanks for the exchange. Peace bro
@aquariussouldier Just out of curiosity, have you googled Hollie Greig? It's not just an isolated incident - it is an exact reproduction of a recurrent theme that permates the higher echelons of power in our society, practically a carbon copy case of the John DeCamp case in Franklin, Nebraska, and the Dutroux case in Belgium...
The definition of the word act is definatly not irrelevent neither is consent.
Nobody is above common law and neither is the government thats why they make statutes and acts, not law, common law is recognised not made.
If everyone knew you had to consent to a statute or act the only people who would be in prison would be those who have caused harm, injury or loss, or fraud in their contracts. I dont think anyone else should be defined as a criminal.
@MogzNg91 my understanding is that the police try their best not to label anyone, and the term criminal is mostly self-imposed. certainly for non-criminal offences, individuals are referred to as "offenders", undoubtedly for want of a even less "loaded" alternative.
i still get the feeling people presume this issue of consent suggests an individual opt-in/out choice. it doesn't. the majority of "the governed" consenting to statutes is the deciding factor, and i believe it will always be so.
The only reason I mentioned criminals is because you said "criminals are rarely honest".
How can you define what the governed means without putting forward any evidence, why would the definition not say "given the consent of the majority of the governed"? Why would it even say "given the consent" if the government made the statute why must they consent to it for it to have the power of law? Why not given the power of law by the government? Why isnt it just defined as a law?
@MogzNg91 i believe the government wanted the governed to have ultimate say. if the majority shifted to disagreement with the upholding of acts, then the system would have to be re-considered.
i suppose the reason they are not passed as straight LAWS, is that [for the sake of conversation] common laws date back to time immemorial, and are protected, so it makes sense to add acts to be thought of as modern revisions with a unknown shelf-life of relevance.
I cant argue with that comment as you stated its your belief and not fact but if that was the case when did we all consent? How can the majority shift to disagreement if we dont get a chance to consent or not?
Why is common law the fundamental law system and statute law based "on top" of that? Why are they not parallel?
If statute law is based on top of common law the only principle that could give it the power of law is a contract which fits with the need for consent.
If equality before and under the law is mandatory then how can anyone have the authority to consent to something on my behalf without my consent? We are all equal.
Why does the definition not say given the consent of the majority of the governed?
As common law is not a list of laws but made of principles it makes sense for the government to create acts as modern interpretations of law for the public. If they do not agree/consent then the matter should be settled under common law.
If common law is the fundamental law system of this country and one of its main principles is equality before and under the law is mandatory then the only human that can give another human authority to consent on my behalf is me, and I dont consent. Also if one of its other main principles is the rule of law, meaning nobody is above the law, how can the government then give anything the power of law?
My understanding is that statute law is based on top of common law in the form of contracts and can only act upon your person. You consent by giving them your person. From what I read statutes and acts are suppose to be an interpretation of what is common law by the government, if you dont agree you dont consent and they can take you to a de jure court to try and prove what you have done is an offence under common law - caused harm injury or loss, or fraud in your contracts.
@alex164 i suggest you watch money and justice (4part), legal lawful (2part) policeman police-officer, police interview a freeman (3part) also hit "The Anti Terrorist page on here to and rob menard (canadian similar laws as uk) john harris! educate yourself on the matter then come back and reread your comment mate. hope you do as your statement is incorrect beyond belief .
Police are not to allowed to search you just because they feel like it and saying that it is suspicious because he doesn't want to be searched smacks of TOTALITARIANISM.
Are you trying to say they can just go about searching anybody, You'll find North Korea if you keep going east
SERIOUSLY DO SOME RESEARCH BEFORE YOU SPOUT OFF GARBAGE, DEFENDING THESE NAZI BASTARDS
@alex164 i dont think you really know what the situation is, as human beings we have rights given by our creator. a statute is a rule of a corporation given the force of law by consent. meaning if we decide to remove our selves from their society (corporation), ie. lawful rebellion , and do not provide the consent, which we were forced into giving before we had the choice, ie. birth, the rules of their corporation do not apply. for example you dont wear a sainsburys uniform to go shopping x
they do alchemy, they put words on to a piece of paper which transforms into riches for their owners, it is plain and simple, they are defrauding people and debasing the life experience of the many for the benefit of a few, in short, they have sold their soul. In all that they do, they fail to see and acknowledge the stupidity in their actions, they guard & protect dolls & other dead things, created by CORPSe which they need those who breathe to believe actually have value & hold worth. fiat-ism
What happened to reasonable suspicion?
fl3162 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Did anything come of this? Well done for standing up to them!
Goat777Face 3 months ago
I don't like the police any more than anyone else, but the civilian in this video is a gobby self-righteous arsehole who could at least have kept his voice down and been respectful. At least listen.
Fucking chav.
LimeySays 4 months ago in playlist Stop And Search Uk
i wanna stab a filthy pig in the face
jgig22 4 months ago
respect bro!
Baddaification 4 months ago
These are some 'dumb as a bag of rocks' policy-office-Sir's.
He could sue them on several counts of misconduct and assault.
Bring them up on harassment charges too.
What they SHOULD be doing is keeping the peace, not disturbing it.
How sad.
GnosticNinja 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good on you mate wish I knew the final outcome if you were searched or not but regardless the uk need more people with yourawareness of civil liberties and the bottle to stand up for them. Im not a cop hater but if we dont tell them when they cross their boundaries, who will?? Nice one.....ill put money on it you meet him again!!!!! If poss emAil me re final outcome. Thanksaw
grantwilliams2000 6 months ago
UKBLIVE. And you also need to remember that break the law however big or small your servants will punish you. Give officers respect & they will respect you, try it sometime instead of being obstructive & abusive. Play up & the officer will do so to your level & punish you. Grow up establishment haters.
09SRILANKA 6 months ago
They are PUBLIC SERVANTS, the Presume YOU are too, you need to inform them that you are not a public servant and they need to do what you say. They work for you because YOU are the beneficiary of your name and they are under you and have no power
UKBLIVE 6 months ago
ask ian tompson if the limys cops are the best
debifeb 6 months ago
Harassment my arse. The UK police are the best in the world, never had any trouble with them, never been in the wrong place at wrong time, mistaken ID, stop searched for no reason etc.... Most posting comments on here I would guess have all of the above. Stop talking out of your bums.
09SRILANKA 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=RTckFl0jPN8&feature=channel_video_title
claim the right of the security of your person !
free humanity here we come love you all !!
it's all common law U.C.C code all commerce law look it up, free information free your mind ! free the WORLD !!!
demented669 7 months ago
Power to the notts
WorksopGimp 8 months ago
keep up the good work g , used to live in st annes know babylon move up notts , its important that information is passed on through out the uk and yes they are all copporate officers , common purpose have training groups withen the police that brainwash them with NLP techniques LOOK IT UP
killoffkili 9 months ago
My only objection to this is once you say I don't want to talk to you SHUT UP! If you talk to the police long enough you will say something that can be used against you.
johnmaylivesv 10 months ago 5
All Police constables swear an oath that they will protect your common law rights. They police by consent and can only detain you if they suspect you have committed an offense. You are sooooo right and the PCs are soooo wrong.
formicapple2 10 months ago
what a bitch ciber cabber none stop of course police will stop you and ask all he can
this is a new world it is complicated all british citizens lived happy for centuries without being awere of the cost of their luxory now what they cannt listen the cops ??they contributed supproted established police goverment all arround the world now they are not happy lol all the power to cops cops are for peoples liberty they are also from people dumc asses they are not space aliens they know bitches
artregeous 11 months ago
also do you know whats sad some shit video like lady fucking gaga etc gets millions hits yet this video and others like it only get over 8k =/ the great british public are asleep and need waking up.
2006rspker 11 months ago
the police dont learn common law now...
2006rspker 11 months ago
I DO NOT CONSENT.
we are policed by CONSENT.
the police are retarded
vxSMOKEYxv 11 months ago
what if the police thought u had a knffe but couldnt question you and you killed someone with that knife
shaffaaf27 1 year ago
@shaffaaf27 So by your logic anyone with a knife should be, arrested, charged and imprisoned regardless of whether a crime has been committed. You do have one in your kitchen don't you? So you could possibly kill someone with one of your knives if you so chose. Sounds asinine doesn't it. As does your statement.
godbluffvdgg 10 months ago
Fuck The Police. We need more faithful police officers.
Instrumental187 1 year ago
This has been going on for years, up and down the country. The police think they are judge and jury. Good video exposing the truth.
TCupUK 1 year ago
I hope these police realize that, basically, they are the instruments of terrorists. Without them and the media trying to pull this bullcrap, terrorists would have no power.
PyroPortrayal 1 year ago
Yes st annes (Y)
ncscmassive 1 year ago
power trippin pigs with a badge..thats all they are..GOOD for you for standing your ground...These jerks need to know the law..and quit being bullies..
Who exactly are they working for? and what probable cause did they have to do any of this in in your recorded clip?
Did they get in trouble for any of this?
I hope u filed charges on them for assault
hunkyguyjake 1 year ago
power trippin pigs with a badge..thats all they are..GOOD for you for standing your ground...These jerks need to know the law..and quit being bullies..
Who exactly are they working for? and what probable cause did they have to do any of this in in your recorded clip?
hunkyguyjake 1 year ago
Whenever an officer significantly restrains you, it constitutes an arrest, even if he doesn’t actually mean to arrest you. If he puts his hands on you or uses any sort of force, that’s an arrest, and any significant restraint must always be supported by probable cause. Without probable cause, the officer is liable for a false arrest and any evidence gathered after that fact is inadmissible in court.
TheAntiTerrorist 1 year ago
antiterrorsist ftw
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffuck the polesmoking police
sizzla123 1 year ago
antiterrorsist ftw
sizzla123 1 year ago
Nicely done mate.....your a legend :) Nice to see ya standing up to these criminals in fancy dress :P
lovinit19791 1 year ago
fuck the police
MrBlaqgold 1 year ago
@phucoff1 let me guess your a bigot or a racist?
jonahlasvegas 1 year ago
kill em hang em fuk them, they are terrorists
JEHERETIC 1 year ago
Pussiest police force ever!
fernandogeorge 1 year ago
are you silly hahaha
Wetgeorge1 1 year ago
6:26 lol this guy is the best...
yappertrap 1 year ago
i get the same shit down here in london like every month police try to stop me for no legit reason. so my dad starts telling me about common law and such.
then just last night they stopped me again for no reason ..dad comes down with the common law and they couldnt touch me
4uRioUs 1 year ago 2
@4uRioUs to me it seems as if london is more police state then america(and you guys claim we are further into police state than you), we don't have CCTV and the police aren't this absurd....but i would still move there just for entertainment from the police's stupidity!
xxxslayerxxx666 1 year ago
@xxxslayerxxx666 ok i did not no any1 was saying anything of the sort but ok...no need to dish it up on a plate
4uRioUs 1 year ago
What do you expect from racist uneducated morons in uniform.
MixingLaboratory 1 year ago
Happy to know people are waking up by the day......!
Good for you for sticking up for your self....!
waynej1407 1 year ago
•An act of Parliament (Act of parliament) is a statute (commonly called a law)? maybe it's nit picking a little. but good on u for standing up to them.
ojc321 1 year ago
@gotknowledge1 Waste of time talking to a sheep mate. haha
tarquinfetherfope 1 year ago
until you have claimed your right as a freeman and it is indisputable then they have the right to search you as you have consented by way of your consent to be governed imo, yet if you have filled in the appropriate paper work and are legally and lawfully classed as a freeman then every thing they have done here is an offence punishable by law and all of the rights you claimed would be in full effect
bondsan 1 year ago
@gotknowledge1 it rhymes, so it must be true. your protest will never make a dint if you can't accept criticism, or at very least retort with witty replies
alex164 1 year ago
NWO (Rome) at work !!.....
freedombiteback 1 year ago
the definition of an "act" is irrelevant. consent is irrelevant. no one is above the law. if everyone said "i don't need to listen to you, i've done nothing wrong", no one would be in prison, and i'm not sure who that benefits. criminals are rarely honest. it comes with the territory
alex164 1 year ago
@alex164 spoken like a true slave to the system
aquariussouldier 1 year ago 2
@aquariussouldier the system has never caused me to have a problem with it, but i do enjoy all this dreary matrix-esque vocab, of we're all "slaves" and to "wake up" etc... it's amazing how little these tired replies hit home. you'll have to be much more creative on the internet, there's not much room left over for over-the-top radical thought, or paranoid delusion
alex164 1 year ago
@alex164 If the system has never caused you to have a problem with it, then I'm genuinely happy for you. But you are in the minority. Everywhere I look I see the corruption lies smoke and mirrors being used by the controlling elite, filtering right the way down to the bottom of the (figurative) pyramid. If you are happy then go on living your life as normal and dont waste your time posting on topics like this, save that for people to whom the system HAS caused them to have a problem with it.
aquariussouldier 1 year ago
@aquariussouldier i appreciated that reply. i think these topics need to have a balance, and it strikes me that impressionable minds are reading this stuff and thinking there is a problem with a country that i 100% believe is the absolute best in the world regarding both its freedom, and its police service, and i will always feel the need to speak up in support of it
alex164 1 year ago
@alex164 It's good to have different views peacefully :) That in itself can be a rarity! I guess, with regards to the issues we are speaking of, it is down to the individual to look at the facts on both sides and make up their own mind. If we dont have our own mind, we have nothing. The wisdom of experience, or second hand beliefs! Thanks for the exchange. Peace bro
aquariussouldier 1 year ago
@aquariussouldier Just out of curiosity, have you googled Hollie Greig? It's not just an isolated incident - it is an exact reproduction of a recurrent theme that permates the higher echelons of power in our society, practically a carbon copy case of the John DeCamp case in Franklin, Nebraska, and the Dutroux case in Belgium...
aquariussouldier 1 year ago
@alex164 its true google (hollie greig)
gotknowledge1 1 year ago
@alex164 you tell him alex cos i agree as IF they'll let criminals just say i dont consent and away you GO......(NOT in this LIFE)
richyrichstuntrider 1 year ago
@alex164 i AGREE with this statement too....
richyrichstuntrider 1 year ago
@alex164
The definition of the word act is definatly not irrelevent neither is consent.
Nobody is above common law and neither is the government thats why they make statutes and acts, not law, common law is recognised not made.
If everyone knew you had to consent to a statute or act the only people who would be in prison would be those who have caused harm, injury or loss, or fraud in their contracts. I dont think anyone else should be defined as a criminal.
MogzNg91 1 year ago
@MogzNg91 my understanding is that the police try their best not to label anyone, and the term criminal is mostly self-imposed. certainly for non-criminal offences, individuals are referred to as "offenders", undoubtedly for want of a even less "loaded" alternative.
i still get the feeling people presume this issue of consent suggests an individual opt-in/out choice. it doesn't. the majority of "the governed" consenting to statutes is the deciding factor, and i believe it will always be so.
alex164 1 year ago
@alex164
The only reason I mentioned criminals is because you said "criminals are rarely honest".
How can you define what the governed means without putting forward any evidence, why would the definition not say "given the consent of the majority of the governed"? Why would it even say "given the consent" if the government made the statute why must they consent to it for it to have the power of law? Why not given the power of law by the government? Why isnt it just defined as a law?
MogzNg91 1 year ago
@MogzNg91 i believe the government wanted the governed to have ultimate say. if the majority shifted to disagreement with the upholding of acts, then the system would have to be re-considered.
i suppose the reason they are not passed as straight LAWS, is that [for the sake of conversation] common laws date back to time immemorial, and are protected, so it makes sense to add acts to be thought of as modern revisions with a unknown shelf-life of relevance.
alex164 1 year ago
@alex164
I cant argue with that comment as you stated its your belief and not fact but if that was the case when did we all consent? How can the majority shift to disagreement if we dont get a chance to consent or not?
Why is common law the fundamental law system and statute law based "on top" of that? Why are they not parallel?
If statute law is based on top of common law the only principle that could give it the power of law is a contract which fits with the need for consent.
MogzNg91 1 year ago
@alex164
If equality before and under the law is mandatory then how can anyone have the authority to consent to something on my behalf without my consent? We are all equal.
Why does the definition not say given the consent of the majority of the governed?
As common law is not a list of laws but made of principles it makes sense for the government to create acts as modern interpretations of law for the public. If they do not agree/consent then the matter should be settled under common law.
MogzNg91 1 year ago
@alex164
If common law is the fundamental law system of this country and one of its main principles is equality before and under the law is mandatory then the only human that can give another human authority to consent on my behalf is me, and I dont consent. Also if one of its other main principles is the rule of law, meaning nobody is above the law, how can the government then give anything the power of law?
MogzNg91 1 year ago
@alex164
My understanding is that statute law is based on top of common law in the form of contracts and can only act upon your person. You consent by giving them your person. From what I read statutes and acts are suppose to be an interpretation of what is common law by the government, if you dont agree you dont consent and they can take you to a de jure court to try and prove what you have done is an offence under common law - caused harm injury or loss, or fraud in your contracts.
MogzNg91 1 year ago
@alex164 i suggest you watch money and justice (4part), legal lawful (2part) policeman police-officer, police interview a freeman (3part) also hit "The Anti Terrorist page on here to and rob menard (canadian similar laws as uk) john harris! educate yourself on the matter then come back and reread your comment mate. hope you do as your statement is incorrect beyond belief .
stay safe pip
PiPphiltitley 1 year ago
@alex164
ACTS ARE NOT LAWS
Police are not to allowed to search you just because they feel like it and saying that it is suspicious because he doesn't want to be searched smacks of TOTALITARIANISM.
Are you trying to say they can just go about searching anybody, You'll find North Korea if you keep going east
SERIOUSLY DO SOME RESEARCH BEFORE YOU SPOUT OFF GARBAGE, DEFENDING THESE NAZI BASTARDS
therhythmicmenace 1 year ago
@alex164
'The definition of an "act" is irrelevant. consent is irrelevant.'
Do not even realise how stupid not sounds!
therhythmicmenace 1 year ago
@alex164 i dont think you really know what the situation is, as human beings we have rights given by our creator. a statute is a rule of a corporation given the force of law by consent. meaning if we decide to remove our selves from their society (corporation), ie. lawful rebellion , and do not provide the consent, which we were forced into giving before we had the choice, ie. birth, the rules of their corporation do not apply. for example you dont wear a sainsburys uniform to go shopping x
kaosisallwesee666 1 year ago
good man!!!!!!! thank you for sticking up for my rights!!!
tegid699 1 year ago
Keep up the good work bro.
iliveyou123 1 year ago
fucking pigs.......
idnumber101 1 year ago
Reasonable ARTICULABLE Cause.
If they have none they can't stop you. FULL STOP.
TheHolySpirit 1 year ago
Is that a WWII poster at 8:32 or is it a mockery?
mindprism 1 year ago
sounds like something out of Life of Brian
hopaloop 2 years ago
they do alchemy, they put words on to a piece of paper which transforms into riches for their owners, it is plain and simple, they are defrauding people and debasing the life experience of the many for the benefit of a few, in short, they have sold their soul. In all that they do, they fail to see and acknowledge the stupidity in their actions, they guard & protect dolls & other dead things, created by CORPSe which they need those who breathe to believe actually have value & hold worth. fiat-ism
BankofSpirit 2 years ago
"yeah but what about if an act is governed by a statute" hahahaha oh my gosh, we have a long way to go,
keep doing your thing man, walk tall bro!
kuel76 2 years ago
this is how it's done. follow this up to the letter of the LAW.
jaffijaffer 2 years ago 10
he he, you crack me up
TheBrotherhoodCircle 2 years ago 3
HIGH 5!! wicked! the police dont even know the law!
truthseekerprophet 2 years ago 20
go son know your rights sair play to ya for standing up i know what its like when the adrenalin kicks in
they say your 'detained'? wtf your cuffed up and in a policy car???
thats an arrest as far as i can tell how ever you wanna dress it up
lookin forward to part 2
peace
psychodrilla 2 years ago 2