Global warming is actually a good thing: longer growing seasons, lower heating costs in northern climes, more agricultural lands available further north. Mankind suffers much much more when there is global cooling.
@OtagoMark@OtagoMark@OtagoMark Come on. Is this a Dorothy Dixer? Monckton had no right to be there. Not one single rational reason. No science background, let alone climate science, and a history of debunked interpretations. The man is a charlatan and he is quite guilty of misrepresenting facts on regualr bases, even after errors are pointed out to him.So why is he there? Why does he put himself up as the limate Change Denier? Does he do it for free? Is he paid? Who by?
@WaltHawtin he presented more FACTs than the others there...and its my understanding that he was invited, and if that the case then he does have a right to be there...Also theres misinformation on the other side of the debate too...even the scientists that support AGW make mistake's...Why hold monckton to a higher standard?
@OtagoMark Just spotted this and had to laugh. You have been conned!!! Lord, he is not even a lord Monckton is a con artist, he chrry picks facts and shows only portions of graphs in his presentations. He confusing the weak minded. He likes attentions and he likes walking in the same steps as scientist in which he is not. He is a journalist and his books on science have never been published or verified by other scientist. What next the world is flat. Wake up and think
In your description you say the Oxburgh Inquiry exonerated the scientists at the UEA. You conveniently "forgot" to mention that while conducting this investigation Oxburgh had close links to businesses that stood to make huge profits, possibly billions of pounds from low-carbon technology. He also failed to disclose his involvement with GLOBE International which financially supports those lobbying for a price on carbon. I'm sure people will draw their own conclusions why you didn't mention this.
@LarryUK65 Not only that, they forgot to explain how and why such biased scientists were working in climate change to begin with. It's amazing they're perplexed & frustrated about losing the public's trust.
Global warming is actually a good thing: longer growing seasons, lower heating costs in northern climes, more agricultural lands available further north. Mankind suffers much much more when there is global cooling.
myownspiritlevel 3 days ago
That was not enough time for either side.
OccamsRzzr 1 week ago
They were unbelievably rude to Lord Monckton....I couldn't believe what I was hearing, very disheartening to hear adults behaving like that
OtagoMark 7 months ago
@OtagoMark @OtagoMark @OtagoMark Come on. Is this a Dorothy Dixer? Monckton had no right to be there. Not one single rational reason. No science background, let alone climate science, and a history of debunked interpretations. The man is a charlatan and he is quite guilty of misrepresenting facts on regualr bases, even after errors are pointed out to him.So why is he there? Why does he put himself up as the limate Change Denier? Does he do it for free? Is he paid? Who by?
WaltHawtin 7 months ago
@WaltHawtin he presented more FACTs than the others there...and its my understanding that he was invited, and if that the case then he does have a right to be there...Also theres misinformation on the other side of the debate too...even the scientists that support AGW make mistake's...Why hold monckton to a higher standard?
OtagoMark 7 months ago
@OtagoMark Just spotted this and had to laugh. You have been conned!!! Lord, he is not even a lord Monckton is a con artist, he chrry picks facts and shows only portions of graphs in his presentations. He confusing the weak minded. He likes attentions and he likes walking in the same steps as scientist in which he is not. He is a journalist and his books on science have never been published or verified by other scientist. What next the world is flat. Wake up and think
elsbymike 1 month ago
@elsbymike You'll have to do better than that. Try something more believable, ad not so easily researched
OtagoMark 1 month ago
1934 is the hottest Hurrel and that wasn't in the last 15 years
OtagoMark 7 months ago
Narcotics floor alimony lens drunk 4 days
ExplodingBacon250cc 8 months ago
In your description you say the Oxburgh Inquiry exonerated the scientists at the UEA. You conveniently "forgot" to mention that while conducting this investigation Oxburgh had close links to businesses that stood to make huge profits, possibly billions of pounds from low-carbon technology. He also failed to disclose his involvement with GLOBE International which financially supports those lobbying for a price on carbon. I'm sure people will draw their own conclusions why you didn't mention this.
LarryUK65 8 months ago
@LarryUK65 Not only that, they forgot to explain how and why such biased scientists were working in climate change to begin with. It's amazing they're perplexed & frustrated about losing the public's trust.
FantasticBob7000 8 months ago
celebrate opulence and genocide
n8valex 10 months ago 2
Ooh, it's great that these are available here. I'll keep coming back.
geniegogo 10 months ago
I guess i'm the only one to want to sit through these.
backfire357 10 months ago