Practical Quantum Cryptography and Possible Attacks

[navgahs]

we need some additional subtitle to enjoy the video...

[JIANPIP]

But that experiment does not show if with some eavesdropper, in experimental sense, can hack the signal.

[o3q]

great topic, horrible video

[CogitoErgoCogitoSum]

Does anyone have an English translation of this video?

[surgeyX]

This guy is a TERRIBLE speaker...it's obvious he can barely speak english and there are so many stutters and pauses...ugh...useless video.

[datadigger]

Such a pity 25% of Google talks doesn't have proper audio recording. This is yet another example where bad audio spoils the fun.

[cakk15]

Sadly this is true.

[nazaxprime]

@datadigger Sure is...

Pity your comment will change nothing, and is little more than a brain fart. Look, Its not like hey try to make the audio as bad as they can, so all your doing is... well pretty much nothing, aside from whhhhhiiiiiiiining.

QQ

Maybe we can talk on topic instead of bitching and voting up comments that are totally off topic.

Maybe we can't.

Please don't reply or thumb me, just please stay on topic.

[txsk8st8]

lithiumdeuteride is right to even look at it changes it so you cant just make a copy but last I heard it has still not beat the 50 mile mark because it dissipates.

[sonofhendrix]

quntum cyptography can be cracked with quntum computers theoretically. And by skilled remote viewers (TRV) teams i would imagine.

[lithiumdeuteride]

No, it can't.

[sonofhendrix]

why?

[lithiumdeuteride]

It is an inherent physical property of photons that measuring them changes their polarization in a random way. And by changing their polarization in a random way, you turn the message into gibberish, immediately alerting the person receiving it that there is someone snooping in on the conversation.

In short, you can't fool nature.

[lithiumdeuteride]

Furthermore, "technical remote viewing" is pseudoscientific nonsense. I guarantee you any practitioner of this technique would fail utterly in a double blind test. For example, predicting the contents of a computer file filled with random data, when neither the person taking, nor the person administering the test know the contents ahead of time.

[sonofhendrix]

TRV began between the years of 1982 and 1983 while a prominent psychic who was working with a world-renowned physicist realized a breakthrough discovery in psychic phenomenon. The discovery was the existence of a set of protocols which could produce accurate psychically derived data on a consistent basis using only a trained mind and a stack of plain white paper. The psychic research project was initially funded by the CIA and then later picked up by the DIA.

[sonofhendrix]

This was the military's competitive response to the alleged Soviet psychic warfare program during the cold war. Even though there was a hope for psychic performance, nobody really expected the results that were discovered and put into motion. The most astounding fact was that they (we) had proven that this new psychic technique could be taught like a language and anyone could learn it.

OPEN your mind lithiumdeuteride. If everyone closed their minds to new theories we would never advance!

[lithiumdeuteride]

I'm completely open to TRV, as long as they demonstrate in double-blind tests that they can remotely view randomized computer data. Until this happens, it's total BS.

I don't care what the CIA did. That's an appeal to authority, a common logical fallacy.

[surgeyX]

@sonofhendrix

Everyone has an open mind when it comes to cool stuff...but if test after test after test after test FAILS to show results...it's time to shut the door and bolt it down.

[surgeyX]

@sonofhendrix

Yeah, and then it was closed down because there were no results after 20 million dollars of taxpayer money had been spent on bullshit.

[CrystalDealer]

Good vid.

[trisetyarso]

good talks

ありがとう　ございます

[wildchildplasma]

Alex You really should check out my home page which is accessable via my channel. I guarantee it will blow your mind.