So if I run into a wall 1000 times, once aday and doing so for 1000 000 years, maybe I will eventually walk right through the wall? I think I understand. So quantum physics, breaks the laws of physics, the general ones? So quantum physics must exist in more than 3 dimensions then. If we live in a 4 dimensional world, than I completely agree with it.
I think is all about probability, if the state is in a 99% probable state then it's predictable enough...but as some people points how did they achieve that?
On the walking through walls: "If you tried to walk through that wall one billion times a second every second for the age of the universe you still wouldn't have even made a dent in the probability."
@shandcunt Just because you do not grasp the mechanics of what these quantum physicists are doing, doesn't mean they do not either. It takes persistent and rigorous testing and integrity in order to be in the position that these people are in.
@heidirh "Just because you do not grasp the mechanics of what these quantum physicists are doing"
Yeah fo shure, I don't doubt it bro. I was impressed, inspired, dazzled and humbled by this video. it was a quick comment I made whilst surfing utube 3 weeks ago (Most probably at 3 in the morn or something similar), please don't take it the wrong way.
Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research lab built machines that were QM - but were measuring effects of observation, which is still a pretty unpopular idea
I can't wait for them to do this with a THz
:P
shakemyass9878 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So if I run into a wall 1000 times, once aday and doing so for 1000 000 years, maybe I will eventually walk right through the wall? I think I understand. So quantum physics, breaks the laws of physics, the general ones? So quantum physics must exist in more than 3 dimensions then. If we live in a 4 dimensional world, than I completely agree with it.
CognitiveNetwork 4 months ago
Comment removed
CognitiveNetwork 4 months ago
hey why are you white people have a lot of talking?
ladysosyalera 4 months ago
I think is all about probability, if the state is in a 99% probable state then it's predictable enough...but as some people points how did they achieve that?
CamiloSanchez1979 6 months ago
Dislike, they didn't provide one bit of explanation on how exactly they verified the resonator was in a quantum state of motion...
avrilinblood 8 months ago
So is it wrong that the second I heard that microwaves were totally key that I thought of the Steins;Gate anime?
nintendodude101 8 months ago
Does this mean we can finally do Schrodinger's cat in the lab?
meyerjac 9 months ago
And then I QM jizzed in my pants...
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh!!!! This is insane!!!
DurexDurpaneu2 9 months ago
On the walking through walls: "If you tried to walk through that wall one billion times a second every second for the age of the universe you still wouldn't have even made a dent in the probability."
I love it.
RedHorseRainbows 11 months ago 3
I want to see that thing that was on 2 places at the same time, i want to see that in that state...
TRUPAC12 1 year ago
Sweet, lets hope they know what they're doing
shandcunt 1 year ago
@shandcunt Just because you do not grasp the mechanics of what these quantum physicists are doing, doesn't mean they do not either. It takes persistent and rigorous testing and integrity in order to be in the position that these people are in.
heidirh 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@heidirh "Just because you do not grasp the mechanics of what these quantum physicists are doing"
Yeah fo shure, I don't doubt it bro. I was impressed, inspired, dazzled and humbled by this video. it was a quick comment I made whilst surfing utube 3 weeks ago (Most probably at 3 in the morn or something similar), please don't take it the wrong way.
shandcunt 1 year ago
Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research lab built machines that were QM - but were measuring effects of observation, which is still a pretty unpopular idea
shpoffo 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Very good, but can they figure out how to do a Rubix cube?
jimmicrackhead12 1 year ago
I want to see something in addition to the talking.
A demonstration in the 'lab' and the reading etc.
(Even if it presents badly, I want to see that)
juliencrawford 1 year ago 15
@juliencrawford so do a little research to find out what journals have published their findings, then get a subscription to them.
coryskawaffle 1 year ago
@coryskawaffle You are quite correct. That's what I should do. I was kinda expecting a youtube post to appeal more to the layman. Like me :-)
juliencrawford 1 year ago
Great !!!!
sigurez 1 year ago
Scientists are very good at doing delicate things.
yuri35435 1 year ago
This is spectacular!!
leeklimes 1 year ago