Let's get freaky socialists and communists including femminsts out of this wonderful world. Those freaky disgusting ppl insist that they're progressive. Progressive to what?
Progressive towards socialism or communism? That has proved itself a big failure based off of a lot of communist or socialist countries. Freaky disgusting stuff(homosexuality, female chauvinism, abortion) is absolutley against Heavenly Father's plan and the law of nature!Keep it mind freaky stuff is degressive!
I agree with SimplyBen84 - I don't care about liberals or conservatives - just let me know you're not a retarded politician and we can come up with at least a compromise.
If Iran was to invade or attack anyone, the resulting backlash from other countries would destroy them.
And to add to that, Iran doesn't have any interest in invading Iraq. The government can barely keep the population together, and is in no shape to invade anyone, let alone have to later deal with Iraq's population.
And you also have to see things from the other point of view. If Iran was sending arms to Shiite resistance, then you should clearly see why.
It's preventative measures that began after US started threatening Iran. Nuclear arms are the same thing.
And in case you haven't realized, Iran's army isn't what it was during the Iran-Iraq war. In fact even back then the main reason for Iran's going on the offensive was a massive population of incredibly motivated soldiers.
Apparently you haven't grasped the meaning of the word "suicide", because that's the consequence of Iran attacking or invading anyone.
And if you're going to complain about Iranian weapons that were suspected of being sent to Shiite resistance, then you need to prioritize because Saudi Arabia is sending multiple times the amount of weapons Iran is sending to the Sunnis (who account for roughly 80%) of the resistance.
The Iran-Iraq war was started by Saddam's invasion of Iran.
Even if Iran DID try to produce nuclear weapons, not only would it be suicide for them to use the weapons, but it would take decades with the technology.
You're entire argument is that Iran is a threat because it has the capabilities. That's not an argument. All the government would gain by invading would be a brutal and bloody war. The whole thing about Iran invading Iraq is a weak scare-tactic.
Alright, let me ask you something, what would happen to Iran if they attacked or invaded anyone?
They would be destroyed. From experience I can tell you that the government is corrupt, but not stupid.
And incase you didn't catch the news, the CIA released a report that stated that Iran stopped its nuclear plans in 2003. And the reason they argued their nuclear program was because it had been already accepted by the UN (and even backed by the US) several decades ago.
Actually the current relations between the two countries are good. For example Iran has already offered to help the government and even opened one of the only hospitals in Baghdad.
Believe me, I used to live in Iran and know the government very well, they would not be stupid enough to invade or attack ANYONE.
Well, Wikipedia describes God as how the religions that have 'Gods' would describe it. While Conservapedia basically calls the other Gods 'false prophets'.
I had to do a media analysis as a project once for my Politics teacher, and I've actually realized that there are only a few sources that could be called "Liberal", however there are several conservative sources out there. (Such as "Faux News").
Basically, the argument that Liberals have the media is not true, basically, anything that doesn't agree with conservative media is generalized as Liberal ones.
It's this whole "junk thought" idea that so many Right wingers have where if the media doesn't agree with their ideas, 1.) jews cause all our problems 2.) the iraq war is valid 3.)Bush is a great leader, They throw the ideas out the window and believe they are evil liberal ideas. It's the most ignorent, blind sort of way to live. Wake up peeps
We have none because giant media companies own television, from which most people get their information. However, the internet is an increasingly important source of mass information, or SMI, as they call it in Russia (even though I'm not Russian). Anyway, many young Americans are turning to the internet, blogs, educational journals, etc. One must remember, that university culture is finally starting to come to more Americans, and education is just starting to spread to the lower classes.
What is liberal and conservative depends on your stance. I think the mass media is still conservative, and the blogosphere seems to reflect that. Talk radio is very conservative b/c thats the crowd they cater to. Now, I'm coming from a slightly different slant, just because I see things a different way.
It's his fault that he talks like a moron. Dubya basically pushed the war on Iraq and then gave TAX CUTS to energy companies and stockholders (reduced dividend tax). This makes HIM guilty of the huge deficit. And the cash infusion that drove down interest rates artificially, which WAS what started the housing bubble that is now bursting was HIS CALL. And if we are not entering a depresion, then why is the financial sector running for cover?
I know, it is a peridox, but heres what I think their logic is, they believe, in the old way of government, right to bear arms, sensored TV and video games and harsh laws on the youth. To answer your question, the old government did not get invovled in people's lives, there was no welfare, all the government did was protect you. I know it sound odd, but I believe it is the correct assumption. I broke away from the party system, and I am not apart of any party. I just got sick of the fighting.
Yeah, and 68% of America has a liberal bias too. Or maybe it's not so much "bias" as it is "sick of watching crap hit the fan constantly" under a president that can't pronounce nuclear, yet managed to turn a budget surplus into a huge deficit, all while increasing the risk of terrorist attacks and creating a housing bubble due to low interest loans that now threathens to spiral into a full blown economic depression.
"4. We have a black supreme justice..we have Colon Powel...Condeleeza Rice, etc, HELLO?"
Don't know the name of the black supreme court justice, COLIN not Colon... and Condi Rice is truly unique she is neither black or white. This list constitute about the 40% of the black conservatives out there
very funny and very true... conservatives can't come up with anything orginal so they simply mirror liberals.. when you look in the mirrow left is right. hurray for the middle. where it's at. Far right and far left are nothing more than comical caricatures
not true. The true liberals/progressives/radicals (whatever you want to call someone) sit back and laugh at the mainstream democrats and republicans with glee, but more with sorrow. i agree with the first part though conservatives, by definition are the mirror opposite of "liberals". liberal means that you see injustice in the world and want to change society for the better, conservative want to "conserve" society, keep institutions etc as they are and keep the social hierarchy and status quo.
The problem is, social liberalism (freedom to choose your lifestyle; tolerance of others) has been combined with the economic left (no economic freedom; no incentive to work; crushing taxation). Conversely, social conservatism (no tolerance for others; social norms arbitrarily dictated by stone-age mythologies) has been combined with the economic right (freedom to keep the fruits of your labor; incentive to pursue a better life). Solution? Libertarianism: all the freedom, none of the control.
YES! Someone has exposed Conservapedia's a fraud! I wouldn't treat a Bush article if it has NO account of his mistakes and even a moving section about his born-again experience with Billy Graham...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
hardcore gay people are just annoying ass hell, being flamboyantly gay and proud should be a crime i dont want my kids seeing fags march around actin all gay.....and this mtv garbage pisses me off too... in the New Testament it says its not wat goes into ur mouth that makes u unclean but wut comes out of it....so unfortunately im pretty much unclean but im sort of a work in progress
You act like people are trying to turn you gay or something, like it's a virus. That's what freaks out people like me, not people who are different, but the ones who hate people who a re different.
Hey im a gay homo fag and I just commented your comment...be carful my gayness can come out of your computer screen and take over your trailer and your sister/wife you redneck yokel!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
fk liberals they push gayness and the killing of the unborn. fk right wingers theyre fear mongering greedy warpigs. both parties are 80% scum who care less about the people anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool. and listen assholes people have the right to believe creationism in any form they choose whether its metaphorically, figuratively, theoretically, or literally. go worship celebrities morons
Hey, I'm all for not wanting babies dead. But in order for something to be illegal, it's a crime, and in order for something to be a crime, it has to harm someone. How do gay people hurt society? Oh, it haunts you in your dreams, because your a homophobe.
Sure, I'm a moderate too but do you know what the bible even says after no gay marriage? No shell fish. Hey I'm christian, but I'm smart enoug to realize that the bible is basicaly "Ye Olde Wiki".
Infact, the entire point I made (which, nobody had the intellectual capacity to understand so far) was your catch phrase of "reality biased to liberals" is a weak soundbite at best. I was merely shattering your views of a "perfect" logic of the left. If that's a problem for you, oh well. I do it to the neo-cons aswell, so don't feel left out.
LOL I went to conservapedia and this was what there definition of Conservitive is
A conservative is one who adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral virtue. A conservative would likely agree with the statement in George Washington's Farewell Address that "religion and morality are indispensable supports" to political prosperity.[1] Conservatism arose in the 19th century as a response to liberalism, particularly as manifested in the French Revolution.[2]
Nice straw man argument. You just need a red herring in there, and you have a complete set of falaciously ignorant comments! Nice representation of the left.
Accuse? You did! Are you mentaly defected? You are! You've only been raving on how right-wingers hate liberals, and how libs don't predominately support conspiracy's, gun control, and other unrealistic ideals! You're fighting fact with fiction, and it's not going good for you.
My point (again,again) is that they are. Why else would the:
Conspiracy theorists mostly be liberal
Their sheeple mostly liberal
You are asleep, and need to wake up and smell the horse shit "mate".
Obviously they are or they wouldn't have been featured on all your major programs, and wouldn't be speaking at your conventions. Maybe not 9/11 conspiracists, but conspiracists in general. Check out the major conspiracists, and it comes as no surprise they are liberal. I didn't ignore that fact, you simply can't read. Yes, yes you did. You're not resorting to a lie.
It's pretty obvious you're a liberal, given you defend them to the death, and deny the obvious. Reality=no bias to liberals.
Oops, forgot, was reading off two lists at a time. Really? Willy Nelson is practicaly and icon to them. Go to any Fox interview with nelson, and read on from there. David Icke also appeals to the UFO lefties, in paticular, his "lizard" thoery. Funny shit. Thanks for dismissing the other list though, proves you can't even defend your own party.
And you're a neo-con shill for using emotional bullshit to garner support. You sound just like the right-wing you mock.
I just did. I do, maybe if you actually look at some of my comments against neo-cons, you'd actually have a clue. But, I know your group isn't particularly fond of research, and that's ok.
Get over yourself. You're pulling a neo-con and using emotional bullshit to demonize me, talk about being a hypocrite. It was still an attack on our trade tower, by a not-before-seen enemy. No conspiracy.
Still waiting for your explanation for why most of this conspiracy garbage comes from the left.
I mocked your spelling? I think you're seeing these kid, better go get your eyes checked. By the way, learn to capitalize, place comma's, and avoid those run-on senetences. Mmk? Yes you do.
Oh I can go on and on about what neo-coons are guilty for....such as being completely fucking retarded and voting to fight a country like Iran, or staying in Iraq for 100more years or so.
lol liberals make stuff up? we're not the ones that are god-crazy here. science is our religion, because there's proof. get your head out of FOX's ass and go watch some actual news like the daily show and BBC.
lol liberals make stuff up? we're not the ones that are god-crazy here. science is our religion, because there's proof. get your head out of FOX's ass and go watch some actual news like the daily show and BBC.
i like how you mock people about their grammatical errors, when everyone knows you take your dandy time spending 10 minutes proof-reading your posts like essays. btw, nice spelling AND grammatical errors, i guess you didn't proof-read this time.
but getting back on topic, i like how you point the finger with ignorance and stupidity. most liberals don't believe what you're implying us to believe in. we don't compare conservatives to hitler, where in the hell do you bring all this crap up?
Just because you can't refute my points without sounding like an uneducated dimwit, does not make them delusional. Fucked up reality you have there rivaladversary.
That would be true, if not for the fact that the predominate liberals, or at least the ones who speak out, support these deluded theory's and policies. How many liberals can you say that don't back at least one of these half-assed conspiracy's, or don't make up some shit to support their arguement? Such as exaggerating the firepower of certain firearms, comparing "right-wingers/independants" with Hitler,etc.
They were still two attacks on our soil. Just different people in charge at the time.
oh, i get what you're trying to convey, but you totally failed. you're a conservative, you're supposed to make no sense; so don't bother even trying to be sarcastic.
Conservatives would be more likely to say "lulz look what happened under a Democrat's watch" then scream "Inside job!". Remember the world trade center bombing under Clinton? I didn't see any conspiracy there.
That is totally different. A group driven by a typical attitude toward events vs. a gender in connection with a crime? Apples to oranges dude. All liberals would say that all conservatives are pictured like you see in the above video, are they right? No me gusta duble' standards.
Uhhhh yes you did. You attempted to swap sides as to say my opinion would be different under a left-wing canidate, which, it wouldn't. There's an issue when most conspiracy nuts are liberal, but then claiming most liberals are not conspiracy nuts? Look at most activists, and tell me they are "right wing".
But my entire point was that reality does not have a liberal bias. That's a simple soundbite one-liner. I ticket independant so really I'm not happy with either side.
Yeah, I can just imagine right wing activists. "Keep things the same, everything is okay."
..apart from those nutty anti-gay and creationist right wingers. Nope, those are lefties too, right? Or communists.. or whatever the latest anti-thought catch-phrase is for people we're not supposed to like. Is it liberal now? I have a hard time keeping up.
What is your obbsession with like...assuming everyone not left wing, being right wing? And not manning up to the reality that your own party has flaws in "logic"?
Oh wait I forgot, reality is biased to liberals, so let's just shutout any and all criticism, since it's all obviously wrong.
Umm, I said there's no such thing as a strict left/right like we're encouraged to believe. That's totally different from saying that everyone who's not left is right.
Me: No such thing as left/right, or "liberals".
You: Stop thinking that everyone who's not left is right, blabla, liberals.
Me: *rolls eyes*
Also I think you're mistaking me for someone else. I haven't commented on this video before.
I never said you were right wing. You insulted "left wingers", and used the word "liberal". You also accused "left wingers" of being the only nutty protestors, so I mentioned anti-gays and creationists, to name a few. Technically people have a "left" or "right" leaning viewpoint, but you seemed to be using it as the catch-phrase being encouraged recently. In that sense, there is no such thing as "left"/"right", as if they are distinct countries or religions or some other excuse for seperation.
You never directly said it no, but your inference was an immediate swap to the right. Thus, your assumptions, and ignoring your own party flaws. anti-gay/creationism/pro-gay/evolution is not the same thing as a conspiracy theory, in paticular, one made to slander a group/government agency.
Left and right views have distinct differences. Independant can fall inbetween, or lean left/right. Unless of course all those years of political dispute were falacious?
You implied there was something nutty about lefties only. I showed it's the same for righties. Stop talking about "my party". You're doing the same thing you falsely accused me of. And you're right, creationism/anti-gay is not the same as a conspiracy theory. Where as conspiracy theories are a common fact of life, you have to be extremely ignorant to be a creationist, or just.. well.. an asshole to be anti-gay. So no, they're not the same.
Erm no. I said the majority of current conspiracy's originate from the left, aswell as ridiculous logic regarding gun control (Such as a .50 cal handgun bringing down an airliner) and the economy. A conspiracy theory isn't fact until proven such. A theory is just that, a theory. Would you make the same argument for the "Big bang theory" or "The theory of UFO's"? I don't think so. It's not your party? Well that's funny, considering how much you defend it.
There is no "it" to defend. I would defend "brown eyed people" too; doesn't make them a party. And consparacy theories are true when they stop being theories. For example in 1954 Israel carried out a false flag terrorist attack against American and British targets in Egypt (look up the Lavon Affair). America has tested deadly chemicals on Americans, and conducted deadly brainwashing experiments on Canadians. These were NEVER even "theories"; we only know because of leaks or captured agents.
There's a difference between a political view/belief/group, and people with brown eyes. Apples to oranges I see. The problem with your "conspiracy FACT" is that it can still be refuted by skeptics after you stop calling it a theory.
Just like the 9/11 truthers call their story true, regardless of evidence brought against them. All depends on perspective. But you can't call a conspiracy officially confirmed until every last bit of controversy is cleared up.
Indeed, I never said it was confirmed. In fact I wouldn't call myself anything more than "open" to it, because if it was not one, it would be the exception to the rule. The point is that conspiracy theories are not "nutty"; they are all around us. They start wars and change the world all the time. Calling someone nutty JUST for having a conspiracy theory is like calling someone dumb for predicting it will rain. The "conspiracy facts" I mentioned have been admitted by the guilty parties though.
Controversy is not nutty, but the logic used for it can be. For example, saying everyone who saw one of those planes crash into the Pentagon say it was a plane, is a paid government agent? Nuts. Just one example of course of a "theory" perpetuated by the truthers, for why people don't believe it was a missle.
Denying involvement in a conspiracy does not neccesarily mean they're wrong.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You're first mistake was saying that this represents a minoriaty of liberals. All of these conspiracy's just seem to spill endlessly from the left. Moon landings, liberals. JFK assasination, generaly liberals, but alot of right-wings to. And now 9/11, definetaly majority left-wing. Your second as was assuming I'm right-wing.
And then there's that whole "Guns kill people" ".50 cals shoot down airliners" thing that also doesn't seem quite right.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yeah reality does have a liberal bias.....guns shot the students at columbine, not the kids. Oh, and you CAN have universal healthcare when your country is 9 trillion in debt. Honestly. Ooooh, you can also bet that 9/11 was an inside job. "Screw loose change" is obviously paid off by the government. All those so called "professionals" were all obviously government agents.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I thought I was making perfect sense! Reality IS biased to liberals! That's why .50 caliber handguns shoot down airliners, and the IDF does suicicidal attacks on the PLO! Let's not forget, the CIA shot Kennedy! They just planted a chip Lee Harvey Oswald and took it out once he was done!
I think if I was being sarcastic, you'd get my point. I also think if you got my point, you'd see my message. But that's assuming I am being sarcastic! The zionists must be behind your confusion!
The existence of this conservapedia strongly suggest that it is indeed conservatism which is an idiology: because truth and reason really seems to have an liberal bias.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I would like to inform anyone that would like to learn about bias to read Bernard Goldberg's book, "Bias". Contrary to what many think, and are expressing on the comments, there is a distortion in the medias views. With exception to Fox News, most major news networks are liberal. I don't understand how people criticize Fox all the time. Just because they are portraying the news differently from CNN, ABC, and CBS, doesn't mean that they are a reactionary news source
people's criticizing of fox news all the time probably stems from the fact that the conclusions they present are so warped & skewed that they border on imaginary tales...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You can joke about it all you want, but anyone who says there isn't a left-wing bias on Wikipedia is blind as a bat. As anyone who has tried to edit on Wikipedia for a long period of time knows, they have a core group of volunteer "administrators" on the site which have turned it into a bureaucratic nightmare which is very much biased in favor of the left-wing viewpoint.
i love this assumption that you all have of a "left wing viewpoint." there are all kinds of liberal views. you know, contrary to what fox news will tell you, not all liberals feel the same about every issue.
Nobody's preventing conservatives from coming to You Tube and posting or watching any video they want or making any comment they want. That 's free speech. If you get thumbs down, tough. That's free speech too.
Black's point is that You Tube and Wikipedia are free markets of ideas. So-called conservatives claim to be for free markets but when the markets don't behave the way they want you get complaints such as reban0's. And venues where opposing views are shut out.
Oh and for the record I am not a liberal, just incase you were thinking that. In fact I feel the major problem with media bias in the UK stems from the BBC's left leaning bias. My comment was merely musing at how schizophrenic News Corp has become with it's politics.
Wow - my comments are not going down well here are they. i feel like i'm intuding on your space! I apologize for clearly offending you - i just think this Lewis Black guy is an idiot and a bad presenter - his arms have a mind of their own. lol
When you continue to repeatedly leave comments that will clearly upset fans of Lewis Black (i.e. calling Lewis Black an idiot and accusing people of "talking out of their ass"), this is called "trolling," or simply being a troll. Instead of apologizing, perhaps you should stick to your own "space" as you call it. Or perhaps...you should do some word research of your own :D
It's not just the topless models. Some of the "articles" they publish are far more erotic than the pictures. Not that I have a problem with that seeing as I am not a conservative. I'd tell you to go pick up a copy and read it for yourself but you probably already do that seeing as you love Murdoch so much.
WTF? I'm not out to defend Murdoch, but u don't seem to understand the nature of the Sun. It's simple reading with lots of entertainment. What is your problem with that? Also, he doesn't control any of the Brit papers. They all have independent editors etc. so he has no influence on the actaul content (except who the sun supports at elections).
First- I didn't say I had a problem with the sun, I just pointed out the hypocrisy.
Second - I said the sun PROMOTED not contained pornography. And as said before, I have no problem with that either. In fact I couldn't care less if it contained hardcore porn, as I was, as stated before pointing out Murdoch's hypocrisy for allowing this. If I had a problem with porn I'd be a major hypocrite.
so it doesn't contain porn, but it is still able to promote it? How does that work. Why not go for the daily star or sport? The Sun is a TABLOID!! And its also the most respected tabloid, so compared to others, its actually quite good.
You are misunderstanding me completely! I know its a tabloid, whether it is or isn't is beside the point! It does promote sex and pornography, you ever read some of the stories it has? The point of my argument was simple: a murdoch owned business promoting unconservative material. Even though the sun does promote right wing politics in regards to crime and immigration, it takes a fairly "liberal" view on sex, which is something that American Conservatives are still strict about.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
He also thinks it is acceptable to say Fox news reports FAKE news. that is a lie and the liberal liers know it but they can get away with it. That crowd is very ignorant in its applause.
Conservative Liberal, left and right. Holy shit you people we're all americans(mostly) on here. Shut the fuck up and learn to compromise. Nothing is perfect, quit your whining, both sides.
marked down may be because people don't like the comment, I mean what else would you use it for? Spam is for irrelevant comments that have nothing to do with the topic.
Watch this, go and search for something on youtube that's controversial, you'll almost always see an opposing side making some kind of ridiculous statement that has nothing to do with the topic. They usually get voted thumbs down pretty fast. I've also noted simple little things (usually things relating to homosexuality) get marked as inappropriate as well. I doubt liberals are doing this, so what can you say about conservatives in this case?
The comments which get voted down or marked as spam are usually unrelated to the topic, in poor taste, or dishonest. If those are the qualities you associate with Conservativie, then that might be an answer to your question. Incidentally, I've voted you up for atleast staying on topic.
I, and most people as far as I know, put a thumbs down on any comments they disagree with. if someone said "I like the spice girls", then i'd probably thumbs down them.
Oh we are huh? I believe we gave you a 16 year head start, and NOW we're trying to control radio? As for music radio stations, I believe Clear Fuck Channel, the biggest right-wing idiot company in America, controls, like, HALF of the radio stations in this country?
It's just that I used to think Lewis Black was cool and now I think he's full of it. His character is a farce; he's nothing like that. He plays the white working man who's seen his whole world collapse around him, but in reality this guy is Jewish and he works for the media! So, he's happier than a pig is mud. Michael Moore has more credibility than Black does. Although, they're both Socialists (Commie-light).
Why don't you looks at his BnB segment on Earth day. It seems to pick on the Hollywood left as much as you would. You're just pissed off because he seems to pick on how moronic conservatives really are. Listen to his first album and hear him piss all over Clinton.
I think that the media are biased. But they're biased in both directions. For the most part, they try to give a fair and objective prospective on events, but it's in human nature to be slanted one way or another. Plus, media play to their audiences. Just watch FOX's and CNN's breakdown of the next presidential address. You'll wonder if they even watched the same speech. The key is to get your information from different sources. Try to get different perspectives on something.
Why don't you youtube for a little "myth of the liberal media", because there is NO EVIDENCE for what you claim. NONE. You just repeat the slogan. In reality the media is controlled and owned by big money. Far right. And this unisono.
So Wikipedia is leftist because you say it is. That seems to be the way modern conservatives reach their conclusions. Because Rush or FOX or James Dobson or some other propagandist for the Reichwing SAYS something repeatedly means it must be true. "My mind's made up, so don't bother me with the evidence."
I guess, what Zarlok2 means is that Wiki and YouTube are leftish because they are open to everyone and they are self-monitoring. Zarlok2 would like some right wing censoring.
I had someone like that on a right wing board pull that crap with me. He says "the facts are all there" I said "what so-called 'facts' r u referring to, the ones from Druggie Limbaugh or Faux Nonsense?" Someone else came in and actually said "If [name withheld] says something is a fact, then it's a fact." Yeah. Right!
Lewis Black rules!
adj789 3 years ago
Stupid schoolboy shit!
apollo1268 3 years ago
I NEEDED THAT LAUGH!!! THANK YOU so much.
Lazario2006 3 years ago
lewis black is so crazy
douchebagcrew9 3 years ago
Haha, american conservatives are way off even though I still stand for some of the values.
ZanWatchesMovies 3 years ago
Paranoid CONservatives.
Rahab111222 3 years ago 4
So awesome!
hthvjd 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is lame
MetalGearRogue 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Let's get freaky socialists and communists including femminsts out of this wonderful world. Those freaky disgusting ppl insist that they're progressive. Progressive to what?
Progressive towards socialism or communism? That has proved itself a big failure based off of a lot of communist or socialist countries. Freaky disgusting stuff(homosexuality, female chauvinism, abortion) is absolutley against Heavenly Father's plan and the law of nature!Keep it mind freaky stuff is degressive!
strongpride73 3 years ago
...Shut Up.
JesusTees 3 years ago
Why do you republicans keep saying that everyone and everything is liberally biased?
Kvltman 3 years ago 2
For similar reason liberals accuse the right for the smae thing. Because they feel misrepresented and dont want to hear much that they disagree.
Ever noticed that even though were a democracy most people act dictorially: Youve got to agree with them or your evil!
People just want to be in control and be right and hate listening to criticism
SimplyBen84 3 years ago 3
I agree with SimplyBen84 - I don't care about liberals or conservatives - just let me know you're not a retarded politician and we can come up with at least a compromise.
iwebber88 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Rupert murdoch is a Jew, just like your ugly unfunny, non-talent ass, Lewis.
Zarlok2 3 years ago
shut your mouth biatch'
you can stop spamming online to make up for your un-talented ass
tynoobi 3 years ago 2
Lewis is funny.
bschrock1977 3 years ago 4
Clearly you are.
If Iran was to invade or attack anyone, the resulting backlash from other countries would destroy them.
And to add to that, Iran doesn't have any interest in invading Iraq. The government can barely keep the population together, and is in no shape to invade anyone, let alone have to later deal with Iraq's population.
GZUSKRYST 3 years ago
And you also have to see things from the other point of view. If Iran was sending arms to Shiite resistance, then you should clearly see why.
It's preventative measures that began after US started threatening Iran. Nuclear arms are the same thing.
And in case you haven't realized, Iran's army isn't what it was during the Iran-Iraq war. In fact even back then the main reason for Iran's going on the offensive was a massive population of incredibly motivated soldiers.
GZUSKRYST 3 years ago
Apparently you haven't grasped the meaning of the word "suicide", because that's the consequence of Iran attacking or invading anyone.
And if you're going to complain about Iranian weapons that were suspected of being sent to Shiite resistance, then you need to prioritize because Saudi Arabia is sending multiple times the amount of weapons Iran is sending to the Sunnis (who account for roughly 80%) of the resistance.
GZUSKRYST 3 years ago
Ok let me explain this:
The Iran-Iraq war was started by Saddam's invasion of Iran.
Even if Iran DID try to produce nuclear weapons, not only would it be suicide for them to use the weapons, but it would take decades with the technology.
You're entire argument is that Iran is a threat because it has the capabilities. That's not an argument. All the government would gain by invading would be a brutal and bloody war. The whole thing about Iran invading Iraq is a weak scare-tactic.
GZUSKRYST 3 years ago
Yea right.
Alright, let me ask you something, what would happen to Iran if they attacked or invaded anyone?
They would be destroyed. From experience I can tell you that the government is corrupt, but not stupid.
And incase you didn't catch the news, the CIA released a report that stated that Iran stopped its nuclear plans in 2003. And the reason they argued their nuclear program was because it had been already accepted by the UN (and even backed by the US) several decades ago.
GZUSKRYST 3 years ago
Actually the current relations between the two countries are good. For example Iran has already offered to help the government and even opened one of the only hospitals in Baghdad.
Believe me, I used to live in Iran and know the government very well, they would not be stupid enough to invade or attack ANYONE.
GZUSKRYST 3 years ago
You think Iran is gonna invade Iraq!?
Lol.
GZUSKRYST 3 years ago
Well, Wikipedia describes God as how the religions that have 'Gods' would describe it. While Conservapedia basically calls the other Gods 'false prophets'.
PenaltyKillah 3 years ago
I had to do a media analysis as a project once for my Politics teacher, and I've actually realized that there are only a few sources that could be called "Liberal", however there are several conservative sources out there. (Such as "Faux News").
Basically, the argument that Liberals have the media is not true, basically, anything that doesn't agree with conservative media is generalized as Liberal ones.
GZUSKRYST 3 years ago
exactly GZUKRYST:
It's this whole "junk thought" idea that so many Right wingers have where if the media doesn't agree with their ideas, 1.) jews cause all our problems 2.) the iraq war is valid 3.)Bush is a great leader, They throw the ideas out the window and believe they are evil liberal ideas. It's the most ignorent, blind sort of way to live. Wake up peeps
donluchitti 3 years ago
We have none because giant media companies own television, from which most people get their information. However, the internet is an increasingly important source of mass information, or SMI, as they call it in Russia (even though I'm not Russian). Anyway, many young Americans are turning to the internet, blogs, educational journals, etc. One must remember, that university culture is finally starting to come to more Americans, and education is just starting to spread to the lower classes.
OmarAlQaseer 3 years ago
What is liberal and conservative depends on your stance. I think the mass media is still conservative, and the blogosphere seems to reflect that. Talk radio is very conservative b/c thats the crowd they cater to. Now, I'm coming from a slightly different slant, just because I see things a different way.
OmarAlQaseer 3 years ago
It's his fault that he talks like a moron. Dubya basically pushed the war on Iraq and then gave TAX CUTS to energy companies and stockholders (reduced dividend tax). This makes HIM guilty of the huge deficit. And the cash infusion that drove down interest rates artificially, which WAS what started the housing bubble that is now bursting was HIS CALL. And if we are not entering a depresion, then why is the financial sector running for cover?
Wafflepudding 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this asshole guy himself is expressing his views on youtube. he will remain a fool. ~~~~
Sushantgupta12 3 years ago
I know, it is a peridox, but heres what I think their logic is, they believe, in the old way of government, right to bear arms, sensored TV and video games and harsh laws on the youth. To answer your question, the old government did not get invovled in people's lives, there was no welfare, all the government did was protect you. I know it sound odd, but I believe it is the correct assumption. I broke away from the party system, and I am not apart of any party. I just got sick of the fighting.
VTAirsofter 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The entire internet has a liberal bias.
Get over it. It's not like any of these people vote anyway.
Aerosion 3 years ago
Yeah, and 68% of America has a liberal bias too. Or maybe it's not so much "bias" as it is "sick of watching crap hit the fan constantly" under a president that can't pronounce nuclear, yet managed to turn a budget surplus into a huge deficit, all while increasing the risk of terrorist attacks and creating a housing bubble due to low interest loans that now threathens to spiral into a full blown economic depression.
Wafflepudding 3 years ago 8
This is changing, more of them are voting and it's wants going to fuck this country up.
soccerbuf 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is one of the most unfunny people on television. Somebody get this guy off tv.
sanjuandan 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
just once I would love to hear this guy say something funny
gleepglopp 4 years ago
"4. We have a black supreme justice..we have Colon Powel...Condeleeza Rice, etc, HELLO?"
Don't know the name of the black supreme court justice, COLIN not Colon... and Condi Rice is truly unique she is neither black or white. This list constitute about the 40% of the black conservatives out there
lv1023 4 years ago 2
Conservatives - Don't know when to Pull out
Conservatives - Think God runs America, and laws should be based on the bible.
Conservative - 90% of them are inbred hicks, who think Iraq was responsible for 9/11
Conservatives - Can't tell when they have destroyed the Economy
Conservatives - Can't tolerant someone if their not white, christian and straight.
You probably don't understand because your a hatefull, controlling ass with a lower IQ then Bush...if thats even possible.
PumaPumaPride 4 years ago 9
very funny and very true... conservatives can't come up with anything orginal so they simply mirror liberals.. when you look in the mirrow left is right. hurray for the middle. where it's at. Far right and far left are nothing more than comical caricatures
lv1023 4 years ago 7
not true. The true liberals/progressives/radicals (whatever you want to call someone) sit back and laugh at the mainstream democrats and republicans with glee, but more with sorrow. i agree with the first part though conservatives, by definition are the mirror opposite of "liberals". liberal means that you see injustice in the world and want to change society for the better, conservative want to "conserve" society, keep institutions etc as they are and keep the social hierarchy and status quo.
itsacorporatething 3 years ago 4
firefox + old memes for the win!
Unclesamslair 4 years ago
The problem is, social liberalism (freedom to choose your lifestyle; tolerance of others) has been combined with the economic left (no economic freedom; no incentive to work; crushing taxation). Conversely, social conservatism (no tolerance for others; social norms arbitrarily dictated by stone-age mythologies) has been combined with the economic right (freedom to keep the fruits of your labor; incentive to pursue a better life). Solution? Libertarianism: all the freedom, none of the control.
phoobaar 4 years ago 8
YES! Someone has exposed Conservapedia's a fraud! I wouldn't treat a Bush article if it has NO account of his mistakes and even a moving section about his born-again experience with Billy Graham...
PenaltyKillah 4 years ago 2
*sigh* Lewis Black and Jon Stewart....
I think I just came a little.
fffanatic06 4 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hardcore gay people are just annoying ass hell, being flamboyantly gay and proud should be a crime i dont want my kids seeing fags march around actin all gay.....and this mtv garbage pisses me off too... in the New Testament it says its not wat goes into ur mouth that makes u unclean but wut comes out of it....so unfortunately im pretty much unclean but im sort of a work in progress
mrtbird84 4 years ago
burn in the hell you keep ranting about, racist
fffanatic06 4 years ago
Does the New Testament say anything about spelling or grammar, you super-tard?
The fact that you have kids scares the crap out of me.
benjwah 4 years ago 4
That was for mrtbird84 below.
benjwah 4 years ago
You act like people are trying to turn you gay or something, like it's a virus. That's what freaks out people like me, not people who are different, but the ones who hate people who a re different.
juventes 4 years ago 2
Hey im a gay homo fag and I just commented your comment...be carful my gayness can come out of your computer screen and take over your trailer and your sister/wife you redneck yokel!
harlow7 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fk liberals they push gayness and the killing of the unborn. fk right wingers theyre fear mongering greedy warpigs. both parties are 80% scum who care less about the people anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool. and listen assholes people have the right to believe creationism in any form they choose whether its metaphorically, figuratively, theoretically, or literally. go worship celebrities morons
mrtbird84 4 years ago
Hey, I'm all for not wanting babies dead. But in order for something to be illegal, it's a crime, and in order for something to be a crime, it has to harm someone. How do gay people hurt society? Oh, it haunts you in your dreams, because your a homophobe.
Sure, I'm a moderate too but do you know what the bible even says after no gay marriage? No shell fish. Hey I'm christian, but I'm smart enoug to realize that the bible is basicaly "Ye Olde Wiki".
MachShot1337 4 years ago 6
fake news on fox news should give you real news.just hilarious
hisunand 4 years ago 7
Infact, the entire point I made (which, nobody had the intellectual capacity to understand so far) was your catch phrase of "reality biased to liberals" is a weak soundbite at best. I was merely shattering your views of a "perfect" logic of the left. If that's a problem for you, oh well. I do it to the neo-cons aswell, so don't feel left out.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
Ha what a joke eh?
Remington722 4 years ago
LOL I went to conservapedia and this was what there definition of Conservitive is
A conservative is one who adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral virtue. A conservative would likely agree with the statement in George Washington's Farewell Address that "religion and morality are indispensable supports" to political prosperity.[1] Conservatism arose in the 19th century as a response to liberalism, particularly as manifested in the French Revolution.[2]
Remington722 4 years ago
Nice straw man argument. You just need a red herring in there, and you have a complete set of falaciously ignorant comments! Nice representation of the left.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
Accuse? You did! Are you mentaly defected? You are! You've only been raving on how right-wingers hate liberals, and how libs don't predominately support conspiracy's, gun control, and other unrealistic ideals! You're fighting fact with fiction, and it's not going good for you.
My point (again,again) is that they are. Why else would the:
Conspiracy theorists mostly be liberal
Their sheeple mostly liberal
You are asleep, and need to wake up and smell the horse shit "mate".
puresrtrash 4 years ago
Obviously they are or they wouldn't have been featured on all your major programs, and wouldn't be speaking at your conventions. Maybe not 9/11 conspiracists, but conspiracists in general. Check out the major conspiracists, and it comes as no surprise they are liberal. I didn't ignore that fact, you simply can't read. Yes, yes you did. You're not resorting to a lie.
It's pretty obvious you're a liberal, given you defend them to the death, and deny the obvious. Reality=no bias to liberals.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
Oops, forgot, was reading off two lists at a time. Really? Willy Nelson is practicaly and icon to them. Go to any Fox interview with nelson, and read on from there. David Icke also appeals to the UFO lefties, in paticular, his "lizard" thoery. Funny shit. Thanks for dismissing the other list though, proves you can't even defend your own party.
And you're a neo-con shill for using emotional bullshit to garner support. You sound just like the right-wing you mock.
But hey, it's the left.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
Oops, also forgot:
David Icke
Willy Nelson
Bill Maher....
puresrtrash 4 years ago
I just did. I do, maybe if you actually look at some of my comments against neo-cons, you'd actually have a clue. But, I know your group isn't particularly fond of research, and that's ok.
Get over yourself. You're pulling a neo-con and using emotional bullshit to demonize me, talk about being a hypocrite. It was still an attack on our trade tower, by a not-before-seen enemy. No conspiracy.
Still waiting for your explanation for why most of this conspiracy garbage comes from the left.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
I mocked your spelling? I think you're seeing these kid, better go get your eyes checked. By the way, learn to capitalize, place comma's, and avoid those run-on senetences. Mmk? Yes you do.
Michael Moore: Liberal? Yes
Alex Jones: Liberal? Yes
Seymore M. Hersh: Liberal? Yes
Rosie O' Donnel: Liberal? Yes
I rest my case.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
Liberals, as described by FOX News: Decadently unconscientious.
Isn't there one thing conservatives are guilty of, then?
PenaltyKillah 4 years ago
Oh I can go on and on about what neo-coons are guilty for....such as being completely fucking retarded and voting to fight a country like Iran, or staying in Iraq for 100more years or so.
But, this is about liberals.
puresrtrash 4 years ago 3
up = from.
lol liberals make stuff up? we're not the ones that are god-crazy here. science is our religion, because there's proof. get your head out of FOX's ass and go watch some actual news like the daily show and BBC.
rivaladversary 4 years ago
up = from.
lol liberals make stuff up? we're not the ones that are god-crazy here. science is our religion, because there's proof. get your head out of FOX's ass and go watch some actual news like the daily show and BBC.
rivaladversary 4 years ago
Yeah the THEOORY of the big bang, nice. Twist a word and you have a new religon, lol.
The daily show is a comedy spoof. But hey, your political group is a joke, so why not? BBC?? Oh yes...the ultimate European Fox news.
Remove-head-from-asshole. Thanks.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
i like how you mock people about their grammatical errors, when everyone knows you take your dandy time spending 10 minutes proof-reading your posts like essays. btw, nice spelling AND grammatical errors, i guess you didn't proof-read this time.
but getting back on topic, i like how you point the finger with ignorance and stupidity. most liberals don't believe what you're implying us to believe in. we don't compare conservatives to hitler, where in the hell do you bring all this crap up?
rivaladversary 4 years ago
Just because you can't refute my points without sounding like an uneducated dimwit, does not make them delusional. Fucked up reality you have there rivaladversary.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
That would be true, if not for the fact that the predominate liberals, or at least the ones who speak out, support these deluded theory's and policies. How many liberals can you say that don't back at least one of these half-assed conspiracy's, or don't make up some shit to support their arguement? Such as exaggerating the firepower of certain firearms, comparing "right-wingers/independants" with Hitler,etc.
They were still two attacks on our soil. Just different people in charge at the time.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
what you call sarcasm is what we call "delusional." try looking that word up kid.
rivaladversary 4 years ago
oh, i get what you're trying to convey, but you totally failed. you're a conservative, you're supposed to make no sense; so don't bother even trying to be sarcastic.
rivaladversary 4 years ago
Hand the conservatives a tissue.
Moviebro 4 years ago
Amazing. This video is brilliant. Lewis Black is the man :-)
CelticHampster 4 years ago
Conservatives would be more likely to say "lulz look what happened under a Democrat's watch" then scream "Inside job!". Remember the world trade center bombing under Clinton? I didn't see any conspiracy there.
That is totally different. A group driven by a typical attitude toward events vs. a gender in connection with a crime? Apples to oranges dude. All liberals would say that all conservatives are pictured like you see in the above video, are they right? No me gusta duble' standards.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
Uhhhh yes you did. You attempted to swap sides as to say my opinion would be different under a left-wing canidate, which, it wouldn't. There's an issue when most conspiracy nuts are liberal, but then claiming most liberals are not conspiracy nuts? Look at most activists, and tell me they are "right wing".
But my entire point was that reality does not have a liberal bias. That's a simple soundbite one-liner. I ticket independant so really I'm not happy with either side.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
i like your sarcasm, it makes absolutely no sense
rivaladversary 4 years ago
Well yeah, most morons can't comprehend wit because it requires that they actually read a statement, rather then skim over it and post a comment.
Thanks.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
Yeah, I can just imagine right wing activists. "Keep things the same, everything is okay."
..apart from those nutty anti-gay and creationist right wingers. Nope, those are lefties too, right? Or communists.. or whatever the latest anti-thought catch-phrase is for people we're not supposed to like. Is it liberal now? I have a hard time keeping up.
Flyborg 4 years ago 3
What is your obbsession with like...assuming everyone not left wing, being right wing? And not manning up to the reality that your own party has flaws in "logic"?
Oh wait I forgot, reality is biased to liberals, so let's just shutout any and all criticism, since it's all obviously wrong.
*rolls eyes*
puresrtrash 4 years ago
Umm, I said there's no such thing as a strict left/right like we're encouraged to believe. That's totally different from saying that everyone who's not left is right.
Me: No such thing as left/right, or "liberals".
You: Stop thinking that everyone who's not left is right, blabla, liberals.
Me: *rolls eyes*
Also I think you're mistaking me for someone else. I haven't commented on this video before.
Flyborg 4 years ago
Yet the were thing you did was assume I was right wing, hence you're reference to the "classic" right wing, as you call it.
"Yeah, I can just imagine right wing activists. "Keep things the same, everything is okay."
That's what you said. Soooo...I think you must be posting on two videos at the same time or something.
It's obvious you need not comment before for everyone to already get your dogma. Just another red herring in the endless debate with liberalism....
puresrtrash 4 years ago
I never said you were right wing. You insulted "left wingers", and used the word "liberal". You also accused "left wingers" of being the only nutty protestors, so I mentioned anti-gays and creationists, to name a few. Technically people have a "left" or "right" leaning viewpoint, but you seemed to be using it as the catch-phrase being encouraged recently. In that sense, there is no such thing as "left"/"right", as if they are distinct countries or religions or some other excuse for seperation.
Flyborg 4 years ago
You never directly said it no, but your inference was an immediate swap to the right. Thus, your assumptions, and ignoring your own party flaws. anti-gay/creationism/pro-gay/evolution is not the same thing as a conspiracy theory, in paticular, one made to slander a group/government agency.
Left and right views have distinct differences. Independant can fall inbetween, or lean left/right. Unless of course all those years of political dispute were falacious?
puresrtrash 4 years ago
You implied there was something nutty about lefties only. I showed it's the same for righties. Stop talking about "my party". You're doing the same thing you falsely accused me of. And you're right, creationism/anti-gay is not the same as a conspiracy theory. Where as conspiracy theories are a common fact of life, you have to be extremely ignorant to be a creationist, or just.. well.. an asshole to be anti-gay. So no, they're not the same.
Flyborg 4 years ago 2
Erm no. I said the majority of current conspiracy's originate from the left, aswell as ridiculous logic regarding gun control (Such as a .50 cal handgun bringing down an airliner) and the economy. A conspiracy theory isn't fact until proven such. A theory is just that, a theory. Would you make the same argument for the "Big bang theory" or "The theory of UFO's"? I don't think so. It's not your party? Well that's funny, considering how much you defend it.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
There is no "it" to defend. I would defend "brown eyed people" too; doesn't make them a party. And consparacy theories are true when they stop being theories. For example in 1954 Israel carried out a false flag terrorist attack against American and British targets in Egypt (look up the Lavon Affair). America has tested deadly chemicals on Americans, and conducted deadly brainwashing experiments on Canadians. These were NEVER even "theories"; we only know because of leaks or captured agents.
Flyborg 4 years ago 2
There's a difference between a political view/belief/group, and people with brown eyes. Apples to oranges I see. The problem with your "conspiracy FACT" is that it can still be refuted by skeptics after you stop calling it a theory.
Just like the 9/11 truthers call their story true, regardless of evidence brought against them. All depends on perspective. But you can't call a conspiracy officially confirmed until every last bit of controversy is cleared up.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
Indeed, I never said it was confirmed. In fact I wouldn't call myself anything more than "open" to it, because if it was not one, it would be the exception to the rule. The point is that conspiracy theories are not "nutty"; they are all around us. They start wars and change the world all the time. Calling someone nutty JUST for having a conspiracy theory is like calling someone dumb for predicting it will rain. The "conspiracy facts" I mentioned have been admitted by the guilty parties though.
Flyborg 4 years ago
Controversy is not nutty, but the logic used for it can be. For example, saying everyone who saw one of those planes crash into the Pentagon say it was a plane, is a paid government agent? Nuts. Just one example of course of a "theory" perpetuated by the truthers, for why people don't believe it was a missle.
Denying involvement in a conspiracy does not neccesarily mean they're wrong.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
i love this commment.
MachoBMan 4 years ago
i love this commment.
MachoBMan 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You're first mistake was saying that this represents a minoriaty of liberals. All of these conspiracy's just seem to spill endlessly from the left. Moon landings, liberals. JFK assasination, generaly liberals, but alot of right-wings to. And now 9/11, definetaly majority left-wing. Your second as was assuming I'm right-wing.
And then there's that whole "Guns kill people" ".50 cals shoot down airliners" thing that also doesn't seem quite right.
It seems sarcasm evades small minds.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah reality does have a liberal bias.....guns shot the students at columbine, not the kids. Oh, and you CAN have universal healthcare when your country is 9 trillion in debt. Honestly. Ooooh, you can also bet that 9/11 was an inside job. "Screw loose change" is obviously paid off by the government. All those so called "professionals" were all obviously government agents.
Yup...reality does certainly have a liberal bias.
puresrtrash 4 years ago
Despite your obvious sarcasm, I still don't know what point you're trying to make. Please try to make sense next time you comment.
ectogamut 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I thought I was making perfect sense! Reality IS biased to liberals! That's why .50 caliber handguns shoot down airliners, and the IDF does suicicidal attacks on the PLO! Let's not forget, the CIA shot Kennedy! They just planted a chip Lee Harvey Oswald and took it out once he was done!
I think if I was being sarcastic, you'd get my point. I also think if you got my point, you'd see my message. But that's assuming I am being sarcastic! The zionists must be behind your confusion!
puresrtrash 4 years ago
Ugg... still hung over. I'll try to connect the dots later. Thanx.
ectogamut 4 years ago
ppl are so stupid i can't believe it, conservative vs liberal is so stupid
gosciu555 4 years ago
And he's probably one of the worst representations of a liberal that you could find. Ill looking, not very charasmatic, and is a pushover.
huntman1412 4 years ago
The existence of this conservapedia strongly suggest that it is indeed conservatism which is an idiology: because truth and reason really seems to have an liberal bias.
wildhias 4 years ago
I've just watched those sites, and I can believe there's people who are retarded enough to believe that shit.
Sevans1982 4 years ago
because typically when conservative oriented media comes out they nearly always claim to be unbiased. highly hypocritical......
SpanerMagnet 4 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I would like to inform anyone that would like to learn about bias to read Bernard Goldberg's book, "Bias". Contrary to what many think, and are expressing on the comments, there is a distortion in the medias views. With exception to Fox News, most major news networks are liberal. I don't understand how people criticize Fox all the time. Just because they are portraying the news differently from CNN, ABC, and CBS, doesn't mean that they are a reactionary news source
footballfrank12 4 years ago
people's criticizing of fox news all the time probably stems from the fact that the conclusions they present are so warped & skewed that they border on imaginary tales...
fuddlovin 4 years ago
Oh, my God, Liberalism is so Liberal.
Hehe, just kidding.
ludachris475 4 years ago
it's funny that liberalism is considered "left wing". in sweden where i live it's considered right
socialism is left, liberalism is not
Glans 4 years ago 2
It's probably largely because socialism was deamonised during the cold war in America.
combatRidders 4 years ago
probably... everything left of liberalism is considered "radical left wing" in america
Glans 4 years ago 2
Same thing here in Uruguay. And I guess it's pretty much the same in most countries
Sevans1982 4 years ago
no, i just explained that in sweden liberalism is considered right
Glans 4 years ago
I guess the truth just has a tendency to sound liberal..
blumenkraft11 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You can joke about it all you want, but anyone who says there isn't a left-wing bias on Wikipedia is blind as a bat. As anyone who has tried to edit on Wikipedia for a long period of time knows, they have a core group of volunteer "administrators" on the site which have turned it into a bureaucratic nightmare which is very much biased in favor of the left-wing viewpoint.
TheSilhouette 4 years ago
i love this assumption that you all have of a "left wing viewpoint." there are all kinds of liberal views. you know, contrary to what fox news will tell you, not all liberals feel the same about every issue.
JonnyRingo84 4 years ago 2
even if it has a slight bias its not as biased as conservapedia.
go to conservapedia and just read their section on feminism.
it gives a one paragraph "history" of feminism and then 5 pages of quotes, all of them from radical feminists.
after that go to wikipedia and look at the same article. then come back here and tell me wikipedia is biased....
SpanerMagnet 4 years ago 4
"Reality has a well-known liberal bias"
--Stephen Colbert, White House Correspondence Dinner
bethiscool08 4 years ago 5
I've just read it, can't believe this is real. This has to be a joke.
Sevans1982 4 years ago
Nobody's preventing conservatives from coming to You Tube and posting or watching any video they want or making any comment they want. That 's free speech. If you get thumbs down, tough. That's free speech too.
Black's point is that You Tube and Wikipedia are free markets of ideas. So-called conservatives claim to be for free markets but when the markets don't behave the way they want you get complaints such as reban0's. And venues where opposing views are shut out.
GTelles 4 years ago 10
Good commentary on the right wing pro-war info-tainment profit driven crap media we have today--especially fox/fake news!
unclebill777 4 years ago 2
Oh and for the record I am not a liberal, just incase you were thinking that. In fact I feel the major problem with media bias in the UK stems from the BBC's left leaning bias. My comment was merely musing at how schizophrenic News Corp has become with it's politics.
SickImperium 4 years ago
Try The Times if you want a News Corp paper that has no 'Porn'!
skiguru99 4 years ago
Wow - my comments are not going down well here are they. i feel like i'm intuding on your space! I apologize for clearly offending you - i just think this Lewis Black guy is an idiot and a bad presenter - his arms have a mind of their own. lol
skiguru99 4 years ago
When you continue to repeatedly leave comments that will clearly upset fans of Lewis Black (i.e. calling Lewis Black an idiot and accusing people of "talking out of their ass"), this is called "trolling," or simply being a troll. Instead of apologizing, perhaps you should stick to your own "space" as you call it. Or perhaps...you should do some word research of your own :D
B10L337H4Z4RD 4 years ago
I wonder how the American conservatives would feel if they knew that Murdoch's tabloids in the UK promoted sex and pornography?
SickImperium 4 years ago 6
Topless chick on Page 3 of The Sun is it. Talk about exageration!
skiguru99 4 years ago
It's not just the topless models. Some of the "articles" they publish are far more erotic than the pictures. Not that I have a problem with that seeing as I am not a conservative. I'd tell you to go pick up a copy and read it for yourself but you probably already do that seeing as you love Murdoch so much.
SickImperium 4 years ago
WTF? I'm not out to defend Murdoch, but u don't seem to understand the nature of the Sun. It's simple reading with lots of entertainment. What is your problem with that? Also, he doesn't control any of the Brit papers. They all have independent editors etc. so he has no influence on the actaul content (except who the sun supports at elections).
skiguru99 4 years ago
First- I didn't say I had a problem with the sun, I just pointed out the hypocrisy.
Second - I said the sun PROMOTED not contained pornography. And as said before, I have no problem with that either. In fact I couldn't care less if it contained hardcore porn, as I was, as stated before pointing out Murdoch's hypocrisy for allowing this. If I had a problem with porn I'd be a major hypocrite.
SickImperium 4 years ago
so it doesn't contain porn, but it is still able to promote it? How does that work. Why not go for the daily star or sport? The Sun is a TABLOID!! And its also the most respected tabloid, so compared to others, its actually quite good.
skiguru99 4 years ago
You are misunderstanding me completely! I know its a tabloid, whether it is or isn't is beside the point! It does promote sex and pornography, you ever read some of the stories it has? The point of my argument was simple: a murdoch owned business promoting unconservative material. Even though the sun does promote right wing politics in regards to crime and immigration, it takes a fairly "liberal" view on sex, which is something that American Conservatives are still strict about.
SickImperium 4 years ago
conservators are one of a kind ...
we cannot be that blind..
we need true balance..
not unilaterality
stereoballs 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He also thinks it is acceptable to say Fox news reports FAKE news. that is a lie and the liberal liers know it but they can get away with it. That crowd is very ignorant in its applause.
skiguru99 4 years ago
It's called comedy, moron
stiv6240 4 years ago 6
It is as good as FAKE. It's biased, overfluffed , stuffed bloated propaganda. As Lewis Black would say....Fox can "suck my dick."
B10L337H4Z4RD 4 years ago
"It's as good as fake" - You're talking out of your ass. Please refer to the 'Overfluffed', and bloated propaganda.
And Btw - i suggest u look up some better adjectives
skiguru99 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That guy is a twat
skiguru99 4 years ago
I picked a black and white cat out of the litter to take home. Wouldn't want someone calling me a racist :P
Wafflelord1 4 years ago
you should define liberal on google.
then try and understand how that is bad >>>> 'liberal bias'
jamy30 4 years ago
Lewis Black and Sam Jackson are two people who have made a career out of shouting all the time.
melman 4 years ago 3
Conservative Liberal, left and right. Holy shit you people we're all americans(mostly) on here. Shut the fuck up and learn to compromise. Nothing is perfect, quit your whining, both sides.
NevadaWrangler 4 years ago
marked down may be because people don't like the comment, I mean what else would you use it for? Spam is for irrelevant comments that have nothing to do with the topic.
diablo997 4 years ago 2
Watch this, go and search for something on youtube that's controversial, you'll almost always see an opposing side making some kind of ridiculous statement that has nothing to do with the topic. They usually get voted thumbs down pretty fast. I've also noted simple little things (usually things relating to homosexuality) get marked as inappropriate as well. I doubt liberals are doing this, so what can you say about conservatives in this case?
diablo997 4 years ago
The comments which get voted down or marked as spam are usually unrelated to the topic, in poor taste, or dishonest. If those are the qualities you associate with Conservativie, then that might be an answer to your question. Incidentally, I've voted you up for atleast staying on topic.
ectogamut 4 years ago
I, and most people as far as I know, put a thumbs down on any comments they disagree with. if someone said "I like the spice girls", then i'd probably thumbs down them.
Nuka5 4 years ago 3
It's easy, what they say is bullshit and nobody wants to hear bullshit so they get rid of it.
diablo997 4 years ago
Oh we are huh? I believe we gave you a 16 year head start, and NOW we're trying to control radio? As for music radio stations, I believe Clear Fuck Channel, the biggest right-wing idiot company in America, controls, like, HALF of the radio stations in this country?
uofmrules1 4 years ago
It's just that I used to think Lewis Black was cool and now I think he's full of it. His character is a farce; he's nothing like that. He plays the white working man who's seen his whole world collapse around him, but in reality this guy is Jewish and he works for the media! So, he's happier than a pig is mud. Michael Moore has more credibility than Black does. Although, they're both Socialists (Commie-light).
Italiasalbion 4 years ago
Why don't you looks at his BnB segment on Earth day. It seems to pick on the Hollywood left as much as you would. You're just pissed off because he seems to pick on how moronic conservatives really are. Listen to his first album and hear him piss all over Clinton.
uofmrules1 4 years ago
I think that the media are biased. But they're biased in both directions. For the most part, they try to give a fair and objective prospective on events, but it's in human nature to be slanted one way or another. Plus, media play to their audiences. Just watch FOX's and CNN's breakdown of the next presidential address. You'll wonder if they even watched the same speech. The key is to get your information from different sources. Try to get different perspectives on something.
pokes404 4 years ago 4
Why don't you youtube for a little "myth of the liberal media", because there is NO EVIDENCE for what you claim. NONE. You just repeat the slogan. In reality the media is controlled and owned by big money. Far right. And this unisono.
trakkaton 4 years ago
The media isn't liberal and it's not conservative.
It's STATIST.
Stop thinking in left to right, it's more complicated than that.
fuzzywzhe 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That guy is a moron.
Italiasalbion 4 years ago
Good thing about being a conservative:
Life is easy.
You don't need a brain! Just believe whatever people said.
bijindesu 4 years ago 7
I love the line about the Ark. priceless
stiv6240 4 years ago 3
BTW Conservapedia is a joke!
uofmrules1 4 years ago 7
Sadly it isn't, but I know what you mean ;)
Golwar 4 years ago 4
the bit is light-hearted. get a life people; if over-stating the obvious hurts your delicate sensitivities, then too fucking bad.
yahmpy 4 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wikipedia is about as neutral as Dan Rather. Perfectly neutral, as long as you are perfectly leftist.
Zarlok2 4 years ago
back that up with some evidence?
Albyiscool 4 years ago 3
So Wikipedia is leftist because you say it is. That seems to be the way modern conservatives reach their conclusions. Because Rush or FOX or James Dobson or some other propagandist for the Reichwing SAYS something repeatedly means it must be true. "My mind's made up, so don't bother me with the evidence."
KatchooFrancine 4 years ago 15
I guess, what Zarlok2 means is that Wiki and YouTube are leftish because they are open to everyone and they are self-monitoring. Zarlok2 would like some right wing censoring.
elzosmid 4 years ago 8
I had someone like that on a right wing board pull that crap with me. He says "the facts are all there" I said "what so-called 'facts' r u referring to, the ones from Druggie Limbaugh or Faux Nonsense?" Someone else came in and actually said "If [name withheld] says something is a fact, then it's a fact." Yeah. Right!
uofmrules1 4 years ago 2
just look up Lewis Black. The clip is there.
uofmrules1 4 years ago
For people arguing over this issue. Don't do it here. This video is meant as political comedy.
SEAL543 4 years ago