I instantly knew his data source was skewed when I saw whom he sourced:
Andrew Bolt
Long story short think of him as the Australian version of Glenn Beck, the guy himself has a reputation of deliberately distorting data or just flat out lie about facts, in fact he was actually sued for racial discrimination for falsely accusing a group of Australian Aboriginals scamming the welfare system based on the ethnicity they call themselves by.
So you can also legally call him a Convicted Racist.
I actually met Lee Doren in DC over drinks with a mutual friend. In no time past our introduction was he berating the environmental lobby, claiming he used to work for it (though he would not say when or where) and, much like a lawyer, tried to avoid direct confrontation when I asked him about his reasons for the argument. Instead, he referred me to his website. Wonderful advice, because I found out what a wanna-be pundit he truly is. Thanks for this video, I enjoyed you're practical approach
Now we know that the data for global warming was fudged.. And this slimy piece of shit is probably still grinning like a retard.
There should be a new rule on youtube. If you call someone out like this and accuse them of being wrong and you are found to be wrong. You should be taken out and shot.
He's got plenty of real information, knowledge, and rationality to back him up on a lot of things. It's when he gets in these petty arguments that he just loses it and becomes an immature pseudo intellectual.
This guy is full of himself, and he´s also full of it. I´m impressed at his qualifications, no really, I am. I only listen to people who have lots of letters after their name, it makes such a difference to all us plebs. Yawn.
But we can all agree that the "How the World Works" guy has an immanently punchable face...I want to knee him in the groin right now just from hearing his voice.
so ..anty ,what ARE your current gut feelings on the global warming debate ..is this happening for sure ,is it made by US for sure ? how bad wil it be ..and how soon will it be bad ? nice pwn ,BTW ..
@woodenmajor I don't know if I have "gut" feelings. From what I understand, yes, it's happening for sure. Humans are probably a big contributing factor. It obviously wont be catastrophic anytime soon, but it could be extremely bad within the next 100-300 years. ...but that's just my understanding. You may want to check with a climate scientist.
I agree with antybu's statement. Might be wise to check with an expert. But I can assure you from personal experiance that this is a bad situation. I work at Wal-Mart as a cart pusher and I have to deal with scorching temperatures due to the effects of global warming. Not only that, the last few days have had a high pollution index.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I am not a hater or anything but if the data does not make sense and the researcher discovers data that fits to the situation, why should that person be punished severely as said on your video? I may have misunderstood. If I did, please disregard this comment.
You should realize that more than 50% of HTWW's "Facts" are blogspam. Such as a Nevada pledge that had students pledge allegiance to Barack Obama. It was posted on a right winged blog site, then linked to on another right winged blog site. Yeah, anonymous post from a right wing blog. Must be legit
"Conspiracy Theorist" is just the way the media has spun it to demean people who question mainstream information. And you clowns who can't see that are the ones who look stupid.
@pretorious700 Agreed and you know the very word "conspiracy theorist" has grown into a slanderous label awarded to free-thinking people nowadays.
What's important here is the common perception people have of someone who's gven the label, and just as important who applies it. The common perception is that someone who is labeled a "conspiracy theorist" is they are suffering from some type of psychological disorder, and that label is usually applied to people by our GOVERNMENT and MEDIA--
--Another thing, this label is applied to anyone who questions our government's version of events in anything. So doesn't it logically make sense that the media is teaching us to assume that anyone who questions the government is insane? When that label is applied to a person, doesn't it become easy to dismiss everything they say without even hearing it? How very convenient for them....
"How the World Works", Lee Doren, would not be asked to appear on Faux "News", if he weren't a conspiracy theorist. According to his web site, Doren has a law degree; however, he apparently learned more about making a persuasive argument while in school, than than he did about presenting factual evidence. He may be clever, but he seems no smarter than Glenn Beck.
Three letters...CRU. Caught lying for years about climate change bu leaked e-mails and ADMITTED it publicly. The head of the CRU actually admitted they lied,
If you LISTEN, he said "I personally believe..." when you say that, the next statement is strictly opinion. Opinion does not need the basis of fact, but he did give the reason for formulating his opinion. When you give an opinion, you do not need to back up the reason for your opinion, but he chose to go the extra mile. If I say that JFK was shot by the CIA, I need to back up that fact...however if I say personally I think JFK.... that is opinion and should be accepted as such....
@stetsonwalker No, opinions need to be reality-based. You can't just say shit and hope to influence people your opinion matters without any kind of facts to back it up.
@dustinjt No an opinion is simply that, the way one sees things from their perspective. If we are standing in the middle of a nasty storm and I say man this is a great day, that would be from my perspective. It need not have any basis in fact!
@stetsonwalker You seem to think all opinions are the same. "Today is a great day" in the middle of a snow storm is not equal to, "That guy is purposely skewing facts in a worldwide conspiracy to fraud the people of money (or whatever these neocons think about Global Warming)."
In the first, yeah... whatever. You like snow. Cool. The second... no, dude. You need facts. You can't make an assertion and be like, "That's my opinion, so I don't need facts." That's just stupid.
@dustinjt The truth is even the global warming nuts have reverted to calling it "climate change" because the fruit loops have been dis proven about global warming.
i love how you label someone conspiracy theorist.... like thats actually derogatory.... Powerful people, who meet behind closed doors, might have an agenda and its detrimental to society at large???... no way.... your a loon Shit, even Reptilian man David Icke makes vaild points. You must stift through the bull and find the nuggets of truth.
Shit even the declaration of independence has "conspiracy theory 101" in its words.
The criticism of Lee's sources sounds valid but when you also call the guy smug and criticize the person rather than the information, it doesn't make you look any better than what you're trying to make him out to be. By the way, he only mentioned his past experiences in that video because it was a response to a video that, like yours, aimed at discrediting him personally, so he defended himself
Lee can act this way because he has never ever made a mistake ever. lol He wins debates by smugging is opponent to death. Listening to him talk even on the very very few times I have agreed with him twists my stomach into knots.
@AgentOrange5553 Haha credentials are qualifications. Telling us tournaments and debates you've won are not at all qualifications, obviously, since by the end of this video you can see, HowTheWorldWorks, is not qualified in debating... llllloooollll.
Haha, that "HowTheWorld"-retard looks so funny when he's reading his moronic speeches. But anyway, wasn't this year's september the hottest ever recorded in California? I do believe I read that somewhere recently..and that's kinda funny.: )
HTWW didn't say that Hanson did it on purpose, he said that he "personally believe" this. Considering how many global warming alarmist behave, I think there is a reason to believe that the error might have been intentional.
So he has 298 videos and you could only find 1 thing he was wrong about? Thats a compliment to him, in its sense, your just making him look even more of a genious.
@Emperordante wow it didn't take but 1 line to see you flaming on someone else. Why don't you get a life cus you're a fatass nerd with no self esteem other than comming on the internet arguing the a stupid point on your point. You are the lost cause just go homeless and get gutted. That seems to be the only thing you have going for you
HowTheWorldWorks also thinks that by leaning forward and staring unblinkingly into a camera, this gives him some kind of authoritative presence. He is such a fail...
I genuinely doubt that he has "graduated from one of the best universities in the U.S." And as far as participation in debates is concerned, 1st year college students participate in debates all over the U.S. and Canada, big deal!
I don't know him. All I believe is what I see. I see that he systematically censors me and many other Youtubers, indulges in Ad Hominem and Argument from Ignorance, and so many other fallacies. That's what I see as an objective viewer, who is not even an American.
You are by far the biggest idiot that doesn't know what he is talking about or either cannot admit when you're wrong and you are a pussy. I wish someone would come up to you in the streets and just beat the mess out of you!
Great video. If you aren't sure about the validity of information pertaining to Anthropogenic Global Warming, I recommend you subscribe to Greenman6010. He has some very informative videos that are based directly on the peer-reviewed papers. He is also great at debunking quasi-scientific papers that are funded mainly by oil companies.
Also, Potholer54 has a few videos relating to AGW.
Al gore is a politician, you don't think he is taking advantage of people to reap profits? same shit dude, howtheworldworks is a intellectual and also cares about america, but quite frankly you don't
I think people are just mad at howtheworldworks because he is a intellectual and you aren't sad, especially to the liberals who try o so hard to defame him
@Maplestoryfan1011 Yea... he's an intellectual with no prior training in any scientific field claiming there is a global scientific conspiracy behind climate change science. He's a fucking LAWYER PAID by corporations to disinform the public in order to protect profits, no matter how immoral or irresponsible those methods are?
I have no problem with making a profit, but if you're going to hurt others in the process, anyone with common sense can see that is wrong.
How the World Works is NOT...a....real...intellectual.
He is a classic example of the common, garden-variety PSEUDO intellectual. If he was a genuine intellectual, he would not have the plethora of detractors that he is swiftly accumulating, who have had little difficulty in spotting his smoke and mirrors act with the facts. He is just another smug kid who is good with debate, and weak on real knowledge....and not very good at concealing himself with sock accounts, either.
Good point, however the 'bandwagon fallacy' has, at it's core, an essential principle of truth: "You can't fool all of the people, all of the time." This would hearken back, in principio, to the 'wisdom of crowds' principle, which is generally taken as something other than a fallacy...
In point of fact, HTWW makes the same mistake made by the Bush Administration, namely, that of 'cherry-picking' his intelligence, or, put more colloquially, selecting data that supports his agenda, rather than trying to maintain an objective viewpoint. This renders him not as "How the World WORKS", but rather "How I SEE the World Working and How I THINK it SHOULD Work." Which makes him not a Reporter, but rather, an ADVOCATE.
@truevoiceofsanity Hm. Yes, there is THAT...and, of course, the fact that he isn't one is rather obvious, to most, anyway. There exists, however, a considerable demographic which seems convinced that a fast line of patter and a smattering of adjectives = intellectualism. For the benefit of those impoverished souls, I felt it necessary to plant a sign pointing AWAY...
@TheMercilessEye His approach, along the lines of Stossel, (except I don't think Stossel lies), is to suggest that intellectuals are impractical. If you sell him as not being intellectual, you are in fact pumping up his stature. Under this view, intellectuals are seen as dealing with ideas that are not grounded in reality. This technique is by the way quite effective.
@truevoiceofsanity Is there an implicit theme in our culture, which he is reflecting here, that intellectual acumen is impractical? Intellectuals deal with ideas that are not only thoroughly grounded in reality, but which also IMPROVE upon that reality - we owe our technology and our our modern standards of living to intellectuals... Are you suggesting that my criticism of him is bolstering this moronic misconception? What course, then, would you suggest I take?
@TheMercilessEye The word intellectual doesn't include all scientists and engineers in the connotation I'm discussing. In essence there is a different between professors who study law and lawyers who practice law. Experience is a great teacher. I'm not sure an effective counter to his distortions. You may want to pick up a copy of the book the polictical brain. Its a bit sad but unfortunately, that discusses the important of emotional. I prefer showing his facts are wrong ... Hard to do.
Hm. A very cogent point, and one well taken (your preference for showing his facts to be wrong.) Yes, that is the best answer, of course, and had I the time to dispute accuracy with this fool, I'd likely do it - and may yet, if I find him annoying me directly. I'll check out The Political Brain, thanks for the reference. Sad indeed that the system has devolved to this point...or did it every really EVOLVE beyond it? Hard to say. Regardless, thanks again.
@TheMercilessEye - you forgot to include that he creeps people out with his robotic stare, his (Simpson's character) Milhouse personna, and his scared-chicken,(ChickenLittle) runaway speech pattern. My anal-sphincter knots up as a result of trying to make sense of what he is trying to tattle on.
@tracer740 Yeah, he's not really even a good speaker, really. He kinda reminds me of those voice-activated, animated Halloween figures you see in department stores - apparently he's never figured out that getting your audience to warm to you doesn't involved an intimidating stare and machine-gun rhetoric. Probably just another fan-boy / geek - and he's his own biggest fan... (I sometimes wonder if his camera is behind one of those two-way mirrors...)
@TheMercilessEye He's not even a good debater. He uses constant logical fallacies to make his points. For example, him pointing to his awards, and his post graduate degree, which he never mentions what he studied. He always uses that to give his assertions authority. What do we call that logical fallacy? Argument from authority.
@Newenlightenmentnow Exactly. And the 'authority' isn't even clearly defined. What we have here is a fast talker with a teleprompter...or flashcards and a quick hand on the 'edit' button...pffft. Worthless.
@TheMercilessEye Yep, it's nice to meet other rational people who came to the same conclusion. I actually did do some research on Lee Doren's qualification. He studied communication at University of Michigan. A great school, but hardly elite (Harvard rejects 90% of applicants). He studied law at Kent College (same as above). This explains his ability to bullshit. Let me pose a question to the forum. How does this man's credentials qualify him to evaluate scientific research?
HTWW is willfully ignorant to the facts and the firm global scientific consensus behind climate change science.
HTWW is a lawyer.
He isn't a scientist. He is scientifically illiterate, and he works for a company that is paid by "anonymous" corporate donors to discredit anything that challenges corporate profit, however immoral those methods may be.
HTWW is that he is TOO smart that he can't see the non-sustainablity of his business ideologies. Crashing environment = crashing economy.
@Maplestoryfan1011 I don't get my climate change science information from Al Gore. I get it from REAL SCIENTISTS. My physics degrees made me scientifically literate enough to read and understand published climate physics peer-reviewed journals DIRECTLY, whilst you rely on conservative pundits to "interpret" them for you.
Please return and tell me exactly what "game" I lost. You can't con me on the facts. I do science research FOR A LIVING. You nor HTWW can fool my ass. Education > rhetoric.
@EcrossH What journals do you read? You must have a lot of time. I've read summaries from the meterologist society and other reputable bodies and it is not presented in a clear way that is unambiguous other than saying "a problem exists" and part of the problem is "man made". HTWW doesn't need to fool you. The problem is the fault of the scientific community. They can communicate what we know and what we don't know better.
Interesting. I'm a fan of HTWW, but -at least from what I can see on your video- he does seem to be off base here. Because of climategate, my first thought was intentional fudging too until you went into details.
One small critique, I would say that Steve McIntyre (pronounced "Mac-in-tire") IS an expert. he's a mathematician and was one of the people that debunked the IPCC's Hockey Stick graph.
Both of you guys are douchebags concerning this topic but I'm going to slightly side with HowTheWorldWorks. While it wasn't right for him to make such a claim, he had no reason to disbelief data from NASA. You'd figure the data is correct and don't want to spend enormous amount of time (like you did) to check if it was wrong.
Oh and calling him a conspiracy theorist for such a minor subject is utterly retarded. That's like calling Obama a communist for his minor social reforms.
Hm...as I recall, Lee has definitely gone down the "Obama-socialism" road a number of times, here and there... in the past. So I guess that makes calling him a conspiracy theorist pretty much okay....which he is, btw, but in a very broad, open-ended sense. He hasn't quite reached the level of the Alex Jones crowd, yet...but he's definitely well along on his way to status as a crank...
The reason you anti conspirators dont get this is because you hold onto on thing and judge everything on that. you must realize most conspiracies have an element of truth to them and while other parts are intentional lies to aid an agenda of the people who run this world. Another thing you guys cannot so is judge for yourself, look at every piece of evidence and see does it all add up to you. Dont expect people profiting off you to give you the truth. Figure it out yourself.
I'm fairly sure HTWW considers himself too good to have ever done data entry. Like I've said elsewhere...he reminds me of Mr. Toomey from Langoliers.
I actually believe the debate awards....in how unprepared he is with regard to doing his own research, and properly citing claims. Science is not a debate, it's about facts and research.
There have been a lot of errors lately and the funny thing it always goes in favor of climate psychosis. I don't suggest someone intentionally tempting with data, but I kiiiiinda don't like that errors pointing in the opposite direction always get corrected before publishing day. I think this unveil something about state of mind among they who are working with climate science.
I don't get why people think these are Lees actual opinions. He is PAID to say what he says. Everything he says is cleared first by the folks that write his paychecks.
If people go around spreading his info, I don't get it ?! What's the fucking point ? That's like telling him that he's right and that there's nothing you can do about it, it's like punching someone in the face because you're out of arguments. Don't do that ! you're doing that little prick a favor !
A very convient error. With TRILLIONS of dollars and massive power changing hands. If it's so easy to make a mistake then it's just as easy to make a mistake on purpose. I wonder when the e mails were hacked did you feel like a total sucker. Or are you still playing the reasonably skeptical yet utterly gullible smarty pants.
To these douche bags (Howtheworldworks), suspicions are just as good as facts, no wait to them they are better then facts and must be taken as truth. If not, you're a witch!!! WITCH!
What an idiot! This is the same guy who was threatening Thunderf00t with legal action just for favoriting a video where it is suggested HTWW has sock accounts, on the basis of Tft "defaming" him. He then goes on to do some very real and very serious defaming of someone else with no evidence to back it up. What a hypocrite.
This guy Lee is an ignorant assclown who thinks he knows it all, being caught up in his own ideological presuppositions while in reality clearly understanding nothing.
I've been 'debating' him in his comment sections, concerning the climate email 'leaks'.
When I utterly debunked all his smarmy nonsense, he simply removed a crucial comment I was making. So much for his libertarianism, he only believes in free speech for the views that he endorses.
clip...cut...clip...cut...clip...cut...clip okay rhet (frankly, I don't give a damn)orically speaking?... if you want to discredit someone???? don't cut and paste the data... trust your audience to have the patience to wade through it I mean You obviously GET spending time' on the "trauma" of repetition... so... run it full? then refute???
Ah, so you're accusing me of taking things out of context? Well, maybe you can answer two questions for me (and try to use some semblance of sentence structure in your response): What specifically was taken out of context and what is the proper context? Also, if this is just taken out of context, why did HTWW actually tell me that I was correct in his "light bulb ban" video?
I really like this video. Thank you for making it. It is nice to see someone keeping a level head & trying to be fair & unbiased in critizising HTWW. No one else is able to do this it seems. Its just primitive hatred of him because he is conservative
You, sir, are an idiot. Those clips say it all, and he said it with conviction. Pretty sure he didn't do it for the lulz ^_^ But I wont attempt to define HTWW's intentions like he himself did, but please do yourself a favor and don't bother spreading your ridiculous opinions in such a way that makes it so easy to rip you apart.
Fudging data almost never happens. Look at what happened to the "cold fusion" work in the late 1980s. Scientists take fabrication very seriously. The right wing and the extreme left wing would like people to believe that science is subjective. It is not.
dudes this guy is a professional propagandist working in Washington for the pro-corporate front group Competitive Enterprise Institute. These people have a long record of disinformation, they are not interested in an honest exchange of ideas. They have misrepresented the research of serious academic scientists and have been called on the carpet for it.
LOL. If you don't have anything to say to refute what was said in this video, it only makes you look less intellectually credible and labeled a retarded fanboy. Unless you have anything important to add to the debate, then you're just jerking yourself off as well as Howtheworldworks, ConservativeDrone.
I love how the internet has destroyed this guys life. He has no hope of getting a good job. No woman will lay with him. I love it. Coward
699backstab 1 month ago
I instantly knew his data source was skewed when I saw whom he sourced:
Andrew Bolt
Long story short think of him as the Australian version of Glenn Beck, the guy himself has a reputation of deliberately distorting data or just flat out lie about facts, in fact he was actually sued for racial discrimination for falsely accusing a group of Australian Aboriginals scamming the welfare system based on the ethnicity they call themselves by.
So you can also legally call him a Convicted Racist.
dctcool 1 month ago
I actually met Lee Doren in DC over drinks with a mutual friend. In no time past our introduction was he berating the environmental lobby, claiming he used to work for it (though he would not say when or where) and, much like a lawyer, tried to avoid direct confrontation when I asked him about his reasons for the argument. Instead, he referred me to his website. Wonderful advice, because I found out what a wanna-be pundit he truly is. Thanks for this video, I enjoyed you're practical approach
WalkFoley 2 months ago
Are we looking at the next Bill O'reilly or Limbaugh?
thybigballs 2 months ago
He's an arrogant little twerp. Completely unlikeable and reeks of the scent of a sad little man desperate for money and approval.
LoneRookRS1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Now we know that the data for global warming was fudged.. And this slimy piece of shit is probably still grinning like a retard.
There should be a new rule on youtube. If you call someone out like this and accuse them of being wrong and you are found to be wrong. You should be taken out and shot.
knowwaie 5 months ago
Comment removed
knowwaie 5 months ago
There are literally thousands of liberal, atheist, faggot videos that are all known to be false, yet are still wasting bandwidth all over youtube.
Pack up your shit and walk off a cliff. Faggot.
knowwaie 5 months ago
dear how the world works,
FUCK YOU
-love jack
hellsingorg2 5 months ago
He's got plenty of real information, knowledge, and rationality to back him up on a lot of things. It's when he gets in these petty arguments that he just loses it and becomes an immature pseudo intellectual.
rockon6191 5 months ago
That was awesome.
He may be real smart, but he ain't real mature!...
TheDisturbism 6 months ago
This guy is full of himself, and he´s also full of it. I´m impressed at his qualifications, no really, I am. I only listen to people who have lots of letters after their name, it makes such a difference to all us plebs. Yawn.
yatter1 7 months ago
But we can all agree that the "How the World Works" guy has an immanently punchable face...I want to knee him in the groin right now just from hearing his voice.
MrJohndoakes 7 months ago 5
its hot here too nutcase but then again ,it is july .
woodenmajor 8 months ago
so ..anty ,what ARE your current gut feelings on the global warming debate ..is this happening for sure ,is it made by US for sure ? how bad wil it be ..and how soon will it be bad ? nice pwn ,BTW ..
woodenmajor 9 months ago
@woodenmajor I don't know if I have "gut" feelings. From what I understand, yes, it's happening for sure. Humans are probably a big contributing factor. It obviously wont be catastrophic anytime soon, but it could be extremely bad within the next 100-300 years. ...but that's just my understanding. You may want to check with a climate scientist.
antybu86 9 months ago 3
@woodenmajor
I agree with antybu's statement. Might be wise to check with an expert. But I can assure you from personal experiance that this is a bad situation. I work at Wal-Mart as a cart pusher and I have to deal with scorching temperatures due to the effects of global warming. Not only that, the last few days have had a high pollution index.
NUTCASE71733 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I am not a hater or anything but if the data does not make sense and the researcher discovers data that fits to the situation, why should that person be punished severely as said on your video? I may have misunderstood. If I did, please disregard this comment.
XxGonixXFAN 9 months ago
You should realize that more than 50% of HTWW's "Facts" are blogspam. Such as a Nevada pledge that had students pledge allegiance to Barack Obama. It was posted on a right winged blog site, then linked to on another right winged blog site. Yeah, anonymous post from a right wing blog. Must be legit
NerdboiisAfroMan 9 months ago 6
"Conspiracy Theorist" is just the way the media has spun it to demean people who question mainstream information. And you clowns who can't see that are the ones who look stupid.
pretorious700 9 months ago
@pretorious700 Agreed and you know the very word "conspiracy theorist" has grown into a slanderous label awarded to free-thinking people nowadays.
What's important here is the common perception people have of someone who's gven the label, and just as important who applies it. The common perception is that someone who is labeled a "conspiracy theorist" is they are suffering from some type of psychological disorder, and that label is usually applied to people by our GOVERNMENT and MEDIA--
pricture 8 months ago
--Another thing, this label is applied to anyone who questions our government's version of events in anything. So doesn't it logically make sense that the media is teaching us to assume that anyone who questions the government is insane? When that label is applied to a person, doesn't it become easy to dismiss everything they say without even hearing it? How very convenient for them....
pricture 8 months ago
"How the World Works", Lee Doren, would not be asked to appear on Faux "News", if he weren't a conspiracy theorist. According to his web site, Doren has a law degree; however, he apparently learned more about making a persuasive argument while in school, than than he did about presenting factual evidence. He may be clever, but he seems no smarter than Glenn Beck.
heathdwatts 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Liberalism is a mental disorder
AroundSun 10 months ago
Three letters...CRU. Caught lying for years about climate change bu leaked e-mails and ADMITTED it publicly. The head of the CRU actually admitted they lied,
TheThunderduck 1 year ago
For some reason I am blocked from commenting on HowTheWorldWorks. I guess Lee Doren believes in "free" markets, but not free speech.
calamagrostis88 1 year ago
If you LISTEN, he said "I personally believe..." when you say that, the next statement is strictly opinion. Opinion does not need the basis of fact, but he did give the reason for formulating his opinion. When you give an opinion, you do not need to back up the reason for your opinion, but he chose to go the extra mile. If I say that JFK was shot by the CIA, I need to back up that fact...however if I say personally I think JFK.... that is opinion and should be accepted as such....
stetsonwalker 1 year ago
@stetsonwalker No, opinions need to be reality-based. You can't just say shit and hope to influence people your opinion matters without any kind of facts to back it up.
dustinjt 1 year ago
@dustinjt No an opinion is simply that, the way one sees things from their perspective. If we are standing in the middle of a nasty storm and I say man this is a great day, that would be from my perspective. It need not have any basis in fact!
stetsonwalker 1 year ago
@stetsonwalker You seem to think all opinions are the same. "Today is a great day" in the middle of a snow storm is not equal to, "That guy is purposely skewing facts in a worldwide conspiracy to fraud the people of money (or whatever these neocons think about Global Warming)."
In the first, yeah... whatever. You like snow. Cool. The second... no, dude. You need facts. You can't make an assertion and be like, "That's my opinion, so I don't need facts." That's just stupid.
dustinjt 1 year ago
Comment removed
dustinjt 1 year ago
@dustinjt The truth is even the global warming nuts have reverted to calling it "climate change" because the fruit loops have been dis proven about global warming.
stetsonwalker 1 year ago
i love how you label someone conspiracy theorist.... like thats actually derogatory.... Powerful people, who meet behind closed doors, might have an agenda and its detrimental to society at large???... no way.... your a loon Shit, even Reptilian man David Icke makes vaild points. You must stift through the bull and find the nuggets of truth.
Shit even the declaration of independence has "conspiracy theory 101" in its words.
ORACLE063 1 year ago
Regardless of his "merits", he still can't understand the concept of errors and mistakes
SQuiRR3LM0nk3y 1 year ago
The criticism of Lee's sources sounds valid but when you also call the guy smug and criticize the person rather than the information, it doesn't make you look any better than what you're trying to make him out to be. By the way, he only mentioned his past experiences in that video because it was a response to a video that, like yours, aimed at discrediting him personally, so he defended himself
thekurgan89 1 year ago
extremely cut and paste and also out of context on a few parts. this gets the thumbs down peace.
monkeywolf 1 year ago
HTWW censors when he is presented with facts that positively refute what he blither on about. Typical of his ilk.
bdhcarbon 1 year ago
@bdhcarbon So much for his post grad degree.
SQuiRR3LM0nk3y 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"I personally believe (us US Americans...)"
JamesTheTank 1 year ago
Lee can act this way because he has never ever made a mistake ever. lol He wins debates by smugging is opponent to death. Listening to him talk even on the very very few times I have agreed with him twists my stomach into knots.
harvellt 1 year ago
@AgentOrange5553 Haha credentials are qualifications. Telling us tournaments and debates you've won are not at all qualifications, obviously, since by the end of this video you can see, HowTheWorldWorks, is not qualified in debating... llllloooollll.
MrMrrRNELLi 1 year ago
@AgentOrange5553 His CREDENTIALS are that he's full of shit. Intellectual dishonesty+ ego=bullshit artist.
angrydead 1 year ago
mmmmmm......fudge
cugamer 1 year ago
HowTheWorldWorks is an Idiot!
goru426 1 year ago
he sounds like my coz ful of it
p3t3rblu3 1 year ago
His blank stare is so creepy.
mrkurt13 1 year ago
How the world works is a fucking asshole, Just that name proves his arrogance.
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago
The guy narrating this video sounds like a hermit-retard that writes way too much fan fiction.
mbr05c 1 year ago
Haha, that "HowTheWorld"-retard looks so funny when he's reading his moronic speeches. But anyway, wasn't this year's september the hottest ever recorded in California? I do believe I read that somewhere recently..and that's kinda funny.: )
winterstellar 1 year ago
HTWW didn't say that Hanson did it on purpose, he said that he "personally believe" this. Considering how many global warming alarmist behave, I think there is a reason to believe that the error might have been intentional.
MigDanskeren 1 year ago
@MigDanskeren then you are a conspiracy theorist too.
Emperordante 1 year ago
@Emperordante
Wouldn't conspiracies usually include more than one person?
MigDanskeren 1 year ago
@MigDanskeren So Hansen is the only scientist that has warned of climate change?
Emperordante 1 year ago
So he has 298 videos and you could only find 1 thing he was wrong about? Thats a compliment to him, in its sense, your just making him look even more of a genious.
bbender1986 1 year ago
@bbender1986 Boy, you love the taste of Lee's cock don't you?
Emperordante 1 year ago
@Emperordante boy you love making yourself look like a retarded douche don't you??
bbender1986 1 year ago
@bbender1986 wrong again, nuthugger.
Emperordante 1 year ago
@Emperordante wow it didn't take but 1 line to see you flaming on someone else. Why don't you get a life cus you're a fatass nerd with no self esteem other than comming on the internet arguing the a stupid point on your point. You are the lost cause just go homeless and get gutted. That seems to be the only thing you have going for you
bbender1986 1 year ago
@Emperordante hahhaha i was right i checked your channel and its all world of gaycraft shit.. what a loser. Hows mom's basement treating you?
bbender1986 1 year ago
HowTheWorldWorks also thinks that by leaning forward and staring unblinkingly into a camera, this gives him some kind of authoritative presence. He is such a fail...
InStunnedDisbelief 1 year ago
HowTheWorldWorks is just a heartless, selfish and greedy libertarian.
reblives 1 year ago
Doesn't he have a show on Fox?
pchtermino 1 year ago
I genuinely doubt that he has "graduated from one of the best universities in the U.S." And as far as participation in debates is concerned, 1st year college students participate in debates all over the U.S. and Canada, big deal!
I don't know him. All I believe is what I see. I see that he systematically censors me and many other Youtubers, indulges in Ad Hominem and Argument from Ignorance, and so many other fallacies. That's what I see as an objective viewer, who is not even an American.
kkamizadeh 1 year ago
Some people are on Youtube only because no one wants to listen to them in their own lives. I feel HTWW is one of these people
TheHomelessCripple 1 year ago
if he used september's temperature for october, and that temperature was one of the hottest months on record...
doesn't that mean SEPTEMBER was one of the hottest months on record?
RaustBD 1 year ago
You'd think if he was so smart, he might try to come up with some useful & relevant graphics instead of a close up of his insipid face.
BarthBunzel 1 year ago
If Lee is so smart, then why is he a theo-con?
BarthBunzel 1 year ago
You are by far the biggest idiot that doesn't know what he is talking about or either cannot admit when you're wrong and you are a pussy. I wish someone would come up to you in the streets and just beat the mess out of you!
remzroller151 1 year ago
@remzroller151 hahahahah exactly
libralssuck 1 year ago
@remzroller151
So angry....
WeedGreenPowerRanger 1 year ago
@remzroller151 well done. have a sticker.
Ilikenuman 1 year ago
@remzroller151 how is he wrong and how is he an idiot???
tw0m0ch 1 year ago 3
I rather have Cenk near my frigde, then this scam artist heading for my town
MrLorack 1 year ago
There is evidence for ClimateGate.
Just search the net or even just youtube
amitp2 1 year ago
Great video. If you aren't sure about the validity of information pertaining to Anthropogenic Global Warming, I recommend you subscribe to Greenman6010. He has some very informative videos that are based directly on the peer-reviewed papers. He is also great at debunking quasi-scientific papers that are funded mainly by oil companies.
Also, Potholer54 has a few videos relating to AGW.
TheAtheistAllegiance 1 year ago
are you relying on wikipedia as a totally reliable source of information on global warming issues?
Virtueman1 1 year ago
OMG ...look at his eyes... he never blinks...
violinonero 1 year ago
0:36 what a nerd!
dcl32 1 year ago
Great video Antybu86.
forevernailed 1 year ago 9
lee is sucha arrogant fuck.
itwilldecompose 1 year ago 4
If you too stupid or apathetic to care about Global Warming fraud, just do us all favor and STFU!
bofors7715 1 year ago
stupid video is stupid!
YoYiYuYa 1 year ago 2
FUCKING BLINK!
mikeellerbeck 1 year ago
Al gore is a politician, you don't think he is taking advantage of people to reap profits? same shit dude, howtheworldworks is a intellectual and also cares about america, but quite frankly you don't
Maplestoryfan1011 1 year ago 4
@Maplestoryfan1011
Hello Lee, nice sock account you got there
KarinMikazuki 1 year ago 3
flagged
HeyoCindygirl 1 year ago
@HeyoCindygirl
Flagged?
Whatever for?
Eron2828 1 year ago
such a fail video.
fapfg 1 year ago
I think people are just mad at howtheworldworks because he is a intellectual and you aren't sad, especially to the liberals who try o so hard to defame him
Maplestoryfan1011 1 year ago
@Maplestoryfan1011 Yea... he's an intellectual with no prior training in any scientific field claiming there is a global scientific conspiracy behind climate change science. He's a fucking LAWYER PAID by corporations to disinform the public in order to protect profits, no matter how immoral or irresponsible those methods are?
I have no problem with making a profit, but if you're going to hurt others in the process, anyone with common sense can see that is wrong.
EcrossH 1 year ago
@EcrossH He ppl is on the pay roll of the oil and car industry like the "think tanks" (Heartland Institute etc)
RazielKain 1 year ago
@Maplestoryfan1011
You're one of his sock accounts, aren't you?
Eron2828 1 year ago 2
@Maplestoryfan1011
How the World Works is NOT...a....real...intellectual.
He is a classic example of the common, garden-variety PSEUDO intellectual. If he was a genuine intellectual, he would not have the plethora of detractors that he is swiftly accumulating, who have had little difficulty in spotting his smoke and mirrors act with the facts. He is just another smug kid who is good with debate, and weak on real knowledge....and not very good at concealing himself with sock accounts, either.
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago 60
@TheMercilessEye
The only evidence you offer for your accusation that he is a "pseudo-intellectual" is "the plethora of detractors that he is swiftly accumulating."
You are committing an error called the bandwagon fallacy. Look it up.
And the next time you want to call someone out for a "smoke and mirrors act" you should look in your own mirror first.
willzyx1980 1 year ago
@willzyx1980
Good point, however the 'bandwagon fallacy' has, at it's core, an essential principle of truth: "You can't fool all of the people, all of the time." This would hearken back, in principio, to the 'wisdom of crowds' principle, which is generally taken as something other than a fallacy...
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago
@willzyx1980
Suggested additional viewing:
watch?v=4f7iVPUGvjc&feature=related
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago
@willzyx1980
In point of fact, HTWW makes the same mistake made by the Bush Administration, namely, that of 'cherry-picking' his intelligence, or, put more colloquially, selecting data that supports his agenda, rather than trying to maintain an objective viewpoint. This renders him not as "How the World WORKS", but rather "How I SEE the World Working and How I THINK it SHOULD Work." Which makes him not a Reporter, but rather, an ADVOCATE.
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago
@willzyx1980
He really should take up something more along his line, like selling Amway products or something else involving sales...
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago
@TheMercilessEye Uhh, who are you to call someone a pseudo intellectual?
y2zgt 1 year ago
@y2zgt LOLOL
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago
@TheMercilessEye he doesn't pretend to be an intellectual.
truevoiceofsanity 1 year ago
@truevoiceofsanity Hm. Yes, there is THAT...and, of course, the fact that he isn't one is rather obvious, to most, anyway. There exists, however, a considerable demographic which seems convinced that a fast line of patter and a smattering of adjectives = intellectualism. For the benefit of those impoverished souls, I felt it necessary to plant a sign pointing AWAY...
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago
@TheMercilessEye His approach, along the lines of Stossel, (except I don't think Stossel lies), is to suggest that intellectuals are impractical. If you sell him as not being intellectual, you are in fact pumping up his stature. Under this view, intellectuals are seen as dealing with ideas that are not grounded in reality. This technique is by the way quite effective.
truevoiceofsanity 1 year ago
@truevoiceofsanity Is there an implicit theme in our culture, which he is reflecting here, that intellectual acumen is impractical? Intellectuals deal with ideas that are not only thoroughly grounded in reality, but which also IMPROVE upon that reality - we owe our technology and our our modern standards of living to intellectuals... Are you suggesting that my criticism of him is bolstering this moronic misconception? What course, then, would you suggest I take?
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago
@TheMercilessEye The word intellectual doesn't include all scientists and engineers in the connotation I'm discussing. In essence there is a different between professors who study law and lawyers who practice law. Experience is a great teacher. I'm not sure an effective counter to his distortions. You may want to pick up a copy of the book the polictical brain. Its a bit sad but unfortunately, that discusses the important of emotional. I prefer showing his facts are wrong ... Hard to do.
truevoiceofsanity 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago
Hm. A very cogent point, and one well taken (your preference for showing his facts to be wrong.) Yes, that is the best answer, of course, and had I the time to dispute accuracy with this fool, I'd likely do it - and may yet, if I find him annoying me directly. I'll check out The Political Brain, thanks for the reference. Sad indeed that the system has devolved to this point...or did it every really EVOLVE beyond it? Hard to say. Regardless, thanks again.
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago
@TheMercilessEye I think this sort of thing was always a problem but today's technology is more complex. Thus, there is more room for fraud.
truevoiceofsanity 1 year ago
@TheMercilessEye - you forgot to include that he creeps people out with his robotic stare, his (Simpson's character) Milhouse personna, and his scared-chicken,(ChickenLittle) runaway speech pattern. My anal-sphincter knots up as a result of trying to make sense of what he is trying to tattle on.
tracer740 1 year ago
@tracer740 Yeah, he's not really even a good speaker, really. He kinda reminds me of those voice-activated, animated Halloween figures you see in department stores - apparently he's never figured out that getting your audience to warm to you doesn't involved an intimidating stare and machine-gun rhetoric. Probably just another fan-boy / geek - and he's his own biggest fan... (I sometimes wonder if his camera is behind one of those two-way mirrors...)
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago
@TheMercilessEye He's not even a good debater. He uses constant logical fallacies to make his points. For example, him pointing to his awards, and his post graduate degree, which he never mentions what he studied. He always uses that to give his assertions authority. What do we call that logical fallacy? Argument from authority.
Newenlightenmentnow 1 year ago
@Newenlightenmentnow Exactly. And the 'authority' isn't even clearly defined. What we have here is a fast talker with a teleprompter...or flashcards and a quick hand on the 'edit' button...pffft. Worthless.
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago
@TheMercilessEye Yep, it's nice to meet other rational people who came to the same conclusion. I actually did do some research on Lee Doren's qualification. He studied communication at University of Michigan. A great school, but hardly elite (Harvard rejects 90% of applicants). He studied law at Kent College (same as above). This explains his ability to bullshit. Let me pose a question to the forum. How does this man's credentials qualify him to evaluate scientific research?
Newenlightenmentnow 1 year ago
@Newenlightenmentnow AH, now THAT'S an EASY one!
Emptiest bottle = Loudest Noise.
He's a SHOE-IN, for it....
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheMercilessEye 8===========D O: ??
XxGonixXFAN 9 months ago
HTWW is willfully ignorant to the facts and the firm global scientific consensus behind climate change science.
HTWW is a lawyer.
He isn't a scientist. He is scientifically illiterate, and he works for a company that is paid by "anonymous" corporate donors to discredit anything that challenges corporate profit, however immoral those methods may be.
HTWW is that he is TOO smart that he can't see the non-sustainablity of his business ideologies. Crashing environment = crashing economy.
EcrossH 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EcrossH al gore is a politician, whos smarter? exactly you lost the game
Maplestoryfan1011 1 year ago
@Maplestoryfan1011 I don't get my climate change science information from Al Gore. I get it from REAL SCIENTISTS. My physics degrees made me scientifically literate enough to read and understand published climate physics peer-reviewed journals DIRECTLY, whilst you rely on conservative pundits to "interpret" them for you.
Please return and tell me exactly what "game" I lost. You can't con me on the facts. I do science research FOR A LIVING. You nor HTWW can fool my ass. Education > rhetoric.
EcrossH 1 year ago 2
@EcrossH What journals do you read? You must have a lot of time. I've read summaries from the meterologist society and other reputable bodies and it is not presented in a clear way that is unambiguous other than saying "a problem exists" and part of the problem is "man made". HTWW doesn't need to fool you. The problem is the fault of the scientific community. They can communicate what we know and what we don't know better.
truevoiceofsanity 1 year ago
Interesting. I'm a fan of HTWW, but -at least from what I can see on your video- he does seem to be off base here. Because of climategate, my first thought was intentional fudging too until you went into details.
One small critique, I would say that Steve McIntyre (pronounced "Mac-in-tire") IS an expert. he's a mathematician and was one of the people that debunked the IPCC's Hockey Stick graph.
HerrSchenkel 1 year ago
Both of you guys are douchebags concerning this topic but I'm going to slightly side with HowTheWorldWorks. While it wasn't right for him to make such a claim, he had no reason to disbelief data from NASA. You'd figure the data is correct and don't want to spend enormous amount of time (like you did) to check if it was wrong.
Oh and calling him a conspiracy theorist for such a minor subject is utterly retarded. That's like calling Obama a communist for his minor social reforms.
c0nv1ct1337 1 year ago
@c0nv1ct1337
Hm...as I recall, Lee has definitely gone down the "Obama-socialism" road a number of times, here and there... in the past. So I guess that makes calling him a conspiracy theorist pretty much okay....which he is, btw, but in a very broad, open-ended sense. He hasn't quite reached the level of the Alex Jones crowd, yet...but he's definitely well along on his way to status as a crank...
TheMercilessEye 1 year ago 3
The reason you anti conspirators dont get this is because you hold onto on thing and judge everything on that. you must realize most conspiracies have an element of truth to them and while other parts are intentional lies to aid an agenda of the people who run this world. Another thing you guys cannot so is judge for yourself, look at every piece of evidence and see does it all add up to you. Dont expect people profiting off you to give you the truth. Figure it out yourself.
digoe04 2 years ago
Nothing is funnier than seeing leftists getting sand in their vag.
So what did you think of Phil Jones losing data he wanted destroyed? Climate Gate?
FOIGate? ChinaGate? HimalayaGate? PachauriGate? PachauriGate II ? PeerReviewGate? U.S.Gate?
tubaboy71 2 years ago
HTWW is obviously a sociopath. Look at his body language-- all the trademarks of a homocidal maniac.
Look at his eyes-- they are completely empty.
mmmmmarcus 2 years ago
I'm fairly sure HTWW considers himself too good to have ever done data entry. Like I've said elsewhere...he reminds me of Mr. Toomey from Langoliers.
I actually believe the debate awards....in how unprepared he is with regard to doing his own research, and properly citing claims. Science is not a debate, it's about facts and research.
Eldeecue 2 years ago
I disagree with damn near everything he spouts. If he has all of this awards why does he not display them on video.
ALEXplus3 2 years ago
HTWW calling somebody else a liar ... so cute.
Xigano1 2 years ago
There have been a lot of errors lately and the funny thing it always goes in favor of climate psychosis. I don't suggest someone intentionally tempting with data, but I kiiiiinda don't like that errors pointing in the opposite direction always get corrected before publishing day. I think this unveil something about state of mind among they who are working with climate science.
Sopranelsker 2 years ago
antybu86, you just owned his ass.
Majic031 2 years ago
I don't get why people think these are Lees actual opinions. He is PAID to say what he says. Everything he says is cleared first by the folks that write his paychecks.
wormbaby79 2 years ago
I just know this...the mtns where my cabin is never had snow year round since 1978.....they do now the past 5 years or so.
MrLostDwarf 2 years ago
wow ! at 0:30 I though he was gonna get on the floor and suck his own dick ! this guy's in love with himself.
coffee396 2 years ago
If people go around spreading his info, I don't get it ?! What's the fucking point ? That's like telling him that he's right and that there's nothing you can do about it, it's like punching someone in the face because you're out of arguments. Don't do that ! you're doing that little prick a favor !
coffee396 2 years ago
"Unlike, HowTheWorldWorks works, I'll try to cite all of the relevant sources."
Are you insane? Lee ALWAYS provides links to sources. Even sources he doesn't cite!
kangarookirby 2 years ago
HTW is a corporate dick sucking fucktard.
coffee396 2 years ago
@kangarookirby apart from the one pointed out in this exact video...
Ilikenuman 1 year ago
That guy is such a damn nutter.
ristinraccoon 2 years ago
i never saw gore's movie either so my views
5 stars
truevoiceofsanity 2 years ago
A very convient error. With TRILLIONS of dollars and massive power changing hands. If it's so easy to make a mistake then it's just as easy to make a mistake on purpose. I wonder when the e mails were hacked did you feel like a total sucker. Or are you still playing the reasonably skeptical yet utterly gullible smarty pants.
cozyfoxstudio 2 years ago
he did say "i believe" not "i know so yes he was speculateing
TheCommentifyer 2 years ago
He is obviously very sharp . . . . to begin with, he's conservative. That gives him a big leg up right there. :)
oilhammer04 2 years ago
To these douche bags (Howtheworldworks), suspicions are just as good as facts, no wait to them they are better then facts and must be taken as truth. If not, you're a witch!!! WITCH!
mrx0066600 2 years ago
What an idiot! This is the same guy who was threatening Thunderf00t with legal action just for favoriting a video where it is suggested HTWW has sock accounts, on the basis of Tft "defaming" him. He then goes on to do some very real and very serious defaming of someone else with no evidence to back it up. What a hypocrite.
rokkvi1 2 years ago 3
This guy Lee is an ignorant assclown who thinks he knows it all, being caught up in his own ideological presuppositions while in reality clearly understanding nothing.
I've been 'debating' him in his comment sections, concerning the climate email 'leaks'.
When I utterly debunked all his smarmy nonsense, he simply removed a crucial comment I was making. So much for his libertarianism, he only believes in free speech for the views that he endorses.
vanderbilt887 2 years ago 2
hes not that great of a debater... Cenk from the young turks schooled him in an interview.
mark1m 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
his is scary if u read this this far u will die in 10 days if u dont send to any 15 videos in 2 hours good luck hope u dont die
Hazeyyyyyyyyy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the guy admits he has won companions based on arguing
the guy admits he can win argument even when his on the wrong side
WHY TRUST HIM
darkdragonsoul99 2 years ago
Indeed. Also thank you soo much for this video. subscribed.
newexperiment 2 years ago
CHUCKtheFED 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
Ah, so you're accusing me of taking things out of context? Well, maybe you can answer two questions for me (and try to use some semblance of sentence structure in your response): What specifically was taken out of context and what is the proper context? Also, if this is just taken out of context, why did HTWW actually tell me that I was correct in his "light bulb ban" video?
antybu86 2 years ago
introductionarily,
what you request...shy of the recombinant bouncing of ear-ily responsive
"rap" papture of internalization....
is that you think I accused you of anything....worth denying.
The unit you fitted...was repetitive...yes??? for a reason...yes???
This is what I cited...
I... PREACH LESSON OF CONSCIOUSNESS
that is a structure of repetition, and when necessary...of trauma...to set the lesson....and I was reflecting on your parallels of it.
CHUCKtheFED 2 years ago
I really like this video. Thank you for making it. It is nice to see someone keeping a level head & trying to be fair & unbiased in critizising HTWW. No one else is able to do this it seems. Its just primitive hatred of him because he is conservative
Espinozaize 2 years ago 2
You, sir, are an idiot. Those clips say it all, and he said it with conviction. Pretty sure he didn't do it for the lulz ^_^ But I wont attempt to define HTWW's intentions like he himself did, but please do yourself a favor and don't bother spreading your ridiculous opinions in such a way that makes it so easy to rip you apart.
Inosix 2 years ago
They have to cut the data up, or it's going to be like 5 minutes of someone else's clip.
NewOnTheSceneT 2 years ago
yea where's HTWW'S now eh ? response none !
CHASCHARLTON 2 years ago
@CHASCHARLTON you want him to respond to every video made about him?
TheCommentifyer 2 years ago
It's cool how this old video, for the most part, is still active.
NapalmXD 2 years ago
Thank you antybu86 ! I liked your video, very well done!
freddyhjj 2 years ago
Fudging data almost never happens. Look at what happened to the "cold fusion" work in the late 1980s. Scientists take fabrication very seriously. The right wing and the extreme left wing would like people to believe that science is subjective. It is not.
heathdwatts 2 years ago
PWN!
ALEXtilionx 2 years ago 2
dudes this guy is a professional propagandist working in Washington for the pro-corporate front group Competitive Enterprise Institute. These people have a long record of disinformation, they are not interested in an honest exchange of ideas. They have misrepresented the research of serious academic scientists and have been called on the carpet for it.
cholotara 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Another liberal moron tries to pwn HTWW and loses. You aren't in his league.
ConservativeDrone 2 years ago
LOL. If you don't have anything to say to refute what was said in this video, it only makes you look less intellectually credible and labeled a retarded fanboy. Unless you have anything important to add to the debate, then you're just jerking yourself off as well as Howtheworldworks, ConservativeDrone.
ChairmanKiel 2 years ago
Great name Conservative Drone. It's so fitting.
heathdwatts 2 years ago
Comment removed
Maxdwolf 2 years ago
HTWW and his ilk are just dishonest manipulators. excuse me while I go vomit
cholotara 2 years ago