In 2002, the Wall Street Journal did an investigation of the scientists who supposedly acknowledged the miraculous scientific accuracy of the Qur'an. They found that the Islamic commission in charge of gathering the scientific support was anything but scientific. One of the scientists even admitted to speaking favorably of the Qur'an in exchange for a free vacation!
@ApathyPersonified Lol wall street journal 2002. How funny you believe a source over actual verses in the qur'an which demonstrate science centuries before they became scientific facts.
@DictaduraNo123 Besides, are we to believe a bunch of "YouTube" browsers with no credentials and authority, hiding behind a screen pretending to be these little gods of knowledge or rather real men of knowledge, scientists, surgeons, embryologists, geologists that have renowned the world and written books that are taught at universities around the world. So stop being so miserable and insecure, trying find errors in the words of God. Grow up, be honest to yourself and try fully understand somet
@DictaduraNo123 A correction of terminologies - a "lamp" has it's own light as well as light that it reflects. Huge suns as 'lamps' is perfect description and more comprehensive a meaning. If you could as little as comprehend the eloquence and accuracy of the use of Arabic to describe such phenomena, let alone understand the language, you'd know what you're dealing with. You demand that God describe His awesome creation in human scientific jargon, an inferior mode of communication?!
@DictaduraNo123 Your argument here assumes that mankind today has debunked all the mysteries of the universe and that our scientists have studied the ends and every inch of this enormous universe that we live. As far a I recall man with (all his arrogance) only been able to set foot on the moon. The fact is we simply don't have all the info to comprehend all aspects of this enormous universe.
MUSLIMS ARE ALWAYS FINDING "MIRACLES". ACCORDING TO THEM THE QURAN TALKS ABOUT THE THERORY OF THE BIG BANG IN 21:30 WHERE IT SAYS THAT "THE HEAVEN AND THE EARTH FORMED A COMPACT MASS THAT WE SEPARATED", BUT WAIT A MINUTE, ACCORDING TO SCIENTISTS THE EARTH EXISTED MILLIONS OF YEARS AFTER THE BIG BANG. IT COULDN'T HAVE BEEN THERE DURING THE BIG BANG, AND BESIDES THE QURAN SAYS IN 41:10-12 AND 2:29 THE OPPOSITE, THAT GOD CREATED THE EARTH FIRST AND THEN THE HEAVEN. SO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE
read carefully. ayah 11 refers to the heaven while it was still smoke - it was there already...and we all know how stars are formed. ayah 12 mentions the completion of the stars...
2 : 29
when heaven is mentioned as something that was already there...
Both 41 : 10-12 and 2 : 29 relate the formation of all that exists, terrestrial and extraterrestrial...i have read it over and over and it is clear that the earth and heaven(as mentioned) both existed together
@lex33122 HA HA HA..YOU ARE ANOTHER MUSLIM "MIRACLE SEEKER". THESE ARE NOT THE ONLY TEXTS THAT DESCRIBE THE UNIVERSE AS CONSISTING OF 7 HEAVENS IN THE QURAN (65:12, 67:5, 23:17, 4:41). YOU MUSLIMS LOVE TO CREATE BIG THEORIES OUT OF VAGUE TEXTS FROM THE QURAN. BUT WHEN THE QURAN MENTIONS THE 7 HEVENS IT IS ONLY REFERRING TO THE BELIEF OF MUHAMMED'S TIME, THE PTOLOMAIC BELIEF OF 7 HEAVENS, A THEORY THAT HAS BEEN PROVED WRONG FOR CENTURIES, WHICH PROVE THAT THE QURNA IS UNSCIENTIFIC.
ABSURDITIES: ACCORDING TO THE QURAN THE STARS ARE "LAMPS", AND NOT HUGE SUNS. THEY ARE ALSO MISSILES AGAINST THE DEMONS. HOW UNSCIENTIFIC! THE QURAN CONFUSES STARS WITH SHOOTING STARS. NOTICE THAT THE TEXT ALSO MENTIONS THE 7 HEAVENS, ANOTHER FALSE BELIEF OF THE PTOLOMAIC VISION OF THE UNIVERSE
67:5 And we have, (from of old), adorned the lowest heaven with Lamps, and We have made such (Lamps)(as) missiles to drive away the Evil Ones, and have prepared for them the Penalty of the Blazing Fire
(2) Apart from the general fallacy of these pseudo-scientific claims, individual claims for scientific knowledge in the Quran invariably rest on two fallacies:
1. The verse does not verily describe what is claimed: the claim is false.
2. The claimed knowledge was already known long before Muhammad: the claim is ignorant.
There is no verse in the Quran, for which scientific insight is claimed, which does not fall under either one or both fallacies. There is no science in the Quran!
(1) Science observes phenomena and develops natural theories explaining them in such a manner that these theories have a reliable predictive value. No verse in the Quran meets this characteristic of modern science. What do you expect? It is an ancient medieval text!
This debunks all pseudo-scientific claims about the Quran, all based on reading modern science into ancient texts (hinein-interpretieren). These claims are therefore meaningless logical fallacies. There is no science in the Quran!
In 2002, the Wall Street Journal did an investigation of the scientists who supposedly acknowledged the miraculous scientific accuracy of the Qur'an. They found that the Islamic commission in charge of gathering the scientific support was anything but scientific. One of the scientists even admitted to speaking favorably of the Qur'an in exchange for a free vacation!
ApathyPersonified 3 days ago
@ApathyPersonified Lol wall street journal 2002. How funny you believe a source over actual verses in the qur'an which demonstrate science centuries before they became scientific facts.
realoverfake 2 days ago
Interview with Allison (Pete) Palmer in 2012.
watch?v=YJUu1wfUzec
ThisIsTheTruthUncut 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Moore is "emeritus", which means he is no longer a professor.
Perhaps we should be told the reason.
sardanapolis 3 weeks ago
@DictaduraNo123 ... Grow up, be honest to yourself and try fully understand something before you spew lies about it.
MAN4651 6 months ago
@DictaduraNo123 Besides, are we to believe a bunch of "YouTube" browsers with no credentials and authority, hiding behind a screen pretending to be these little gods of knowledge or rather real men of knowledge, scientists, surgeons, embryologists, geologists that have renowned the world and written books that are taught at universities around the world. So stop being so miserable and insecure, trying find errors in the words of God. Grow up, be honest to yourself and try fully understand somet
MAN4651 6 months ago
@DictaduraNo123 A correction of terminologies - a "lamp" has it's own light as well as light that it reflects. Huge suns as 'lamps' is perfect description and more comprehensive a meaning. If you could as little as comprehend the eloquence and accuracy of the use of Arabic to describe such phenomena, let alone understand the language, you'd know what you're dealing with. You demand that God describe His awesome creation in human scientific jargon, an inferior mode of communication?!
MAN4651 6 months ago
@DictaduraNo123 Your argument here assumes that mankind today has debunked all the mysteries of the universe and that our scientists have studied the ends and every inch of this enormous universe that we live. As far a I recall man with (all his arrogance) only been able to set foot on the moon. The fact is we simply don't have all the info to comprehend all aspects of this enormous universe.
MAN4651 6 months ago
MUSLIMS ARE ALWAYS FINDING "MIRACLES". ACCORDING TO THEM THE QURAN TALKS ABOUT THE THERORY OF THE BIG BANG IN 21:30 WHERE IT SAYS THAT "THE HEAVEN AND THE EARTH FORMED A COMPACT MASS THAT WE SEPARATED", BUT WAIT A MINUTE, ACCORDING TO SCIENTISTS THE EARTH EXISTED MILLIONS OF YEARS AFTER THE BIG BANG. IT COULDN'T HAVE BEEN THERE DURING THE BIG BANG, AND BESIDES THE QURAN SAYS IN 41:10-12 AND 2:29 THE OPPOSITE, THAT GOD CREATED THE EARTH FIRST AND THEN THE HEAVEN. SO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE
DictaduraNo123 7 months ago
@DictaduraNo123
41 : 10-12
read carefully. ayah 11 refers to the heaven while it was still smoke - it was there already...and we all know how stars are formed. ayah 12 mentions the completion of the stars...
2 : 29
when heaven is mentioned as something that was already there...
Both 41 : 10-12 and 2 : 29 relate the formation of all that exists, terrestrial and extraterrestrial...i have read it over and over and it is clear that the earth and heaven(as mentioned) both existed together
lex33122 7 months ago
@lex33122 HA HA HA..YOU ARE ANOTHER MUSLIM "MIRACLE SEEKER". THESE ARE NOT THE ONLY TEXTS THAT DESCRIBE THE UNIVERSE AS CONSISTING OF 7 HEAVENS IN THE QURAN (65:12, 67:5, 23:17, 4:41). YOU MUSLIMS LOVE TO CREATE BIG THEORIES OUT OF VAGUE TEXTS FROM THE QURAN. BUT WHEN THE QURAN MENTIONS THE 7 HEVENS IT IS ONLY REFERRING TO THE BELIEF OF MUHAMMED'S TIME, THE PTOLOMAIC BELIEF OF 7 HEAVENS, A THEORY THAT HAS BEEN PROVED WRONG FOR CENTURIES, WHICH PROVE THAT THE QURNA IS UNSCIENTIFIC.
DictaduraNo123 7 months ago
ABSURDITIES: ACCORDING TO THE QURAN THE STARS ARE "LAMPS", AND NOT HUGE SUNS. THEY ARE ALSO MISSILES AGAINST THE DEMONS. HOW UNSCIENTIFIC! THE QURAN CONFUSES STARS WITH SHOOTING STARS. NOTICE THAT THE TEXT ALSO MENTIONS THE 7 HEAVENS, ANOTHER FALSE BELIEF OF THE PTOLOMAIC VISION OF THE UNIVERSE
67:5 And we have, (from of old), adorned the lowest heaven with Lamps, and We have made such (Lamps)(as) missiles to drive away the Evil Ones, and have prepared for them the Penalty of the Blazing Fire
DictaduraNo123 7 months ago
This appeals to anybody whose PC is also 50 years old.
Next slide.
StopSpamming1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(3) And if this logic does not convince you, do some research yourself; there is ample scientific evidence that there is no science in the Quran.
Just an example:
Does the Qur'an Have any scientific Miracles?
w w w. mukto-mona. com /Articles /avijit /Quran_miracle. htm
w w w. mukto-mona. com /Articles /avijit /Quran_miracle2. htm
(remove blank spaces)
There is no science in the Quran!
evospecies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(2) Apart from the general fallacy of these pseudo-scientific claims, individual claims for scientific knowledge in the Quran invariably rest on two fallacies:
1. The verse does not verily describe what is claimed: the claim is false.
2. The claimed knowledge was already known long before Muhammad: the claim is ignorant.
There is no verse in the Quran, for which scientific insight is claimed, which does not fall under either one or both fallacies. There is no science in the Quran!
evospecies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(1) Science observes phenomena and develops natural theories explaining them in such a manner that these theories have a reliable predictive value. No verse in the Quran meets this characteristic of modern science. What do you expect? It is an ancient medieval text!
This debunks all pseudo-scientific claims about the Quran, all based on reading modern science into ancient texts (hinein-interpretieren). These claims are therefore meaningless logical fallacies. There is no science in the Quran!
evospecies 2 years ago
I ask ALLAH to reward you. EXCELLENT **********
I Ask ALLAH to reward you with Jannah.
I ask ALLAH to reward you for your time and effort
bmsabry 3 years ago 4
thanx alot...........
dawath 3 years ago