This game made it so you actually needed to use strategy and tactics, maneuvering your troops, managing equipment, picking battles, finding which tool you have that's best for the issue at hand. In conventional RTS, you just build your base faster then your opponent and gobble up resources to over power people.
If I had a dollar (an Australian dollar mind you, as it's now worth more than the USD :P) every time I watched that CGI trailer and wondered why they haven't made a blockbuster movie out of Warhammer 40K...or at least an FPS (like 'fire warrior' but better) I suppose it stops the franchise slipping into mainstream valley and never being able to get back out again.
Lol this guy probably played through the campaign on easy. No strategy? Pfft, pick a difficulty where you actually have to think and plan your approach and can't get away with steam rolling everything, and good luck to you my friend.
Although I do agree with him on the multiplayer, it's what makes the experience worth the money. THE CRAFTWORLD IS OUR HOME AND WE ARE HER GUARDIANS!
so the campaign is tactical yet not strategic? I know for a fact that clicking all your units as one group around the campaign will not work, its all about cover, positioning, and abilities. This reviewer fails to realize what strategy really means.
@popcornpopper2 Stratergic is what your overall plan is, say.... get insane income and just overwhelm your enemies with lots of stuff. or rush somthing dangerous and try to finish it within 7min. tactics are however Cover positioning and abilties, I.E. the tricks you use to give you the edge in a battle but wont really matter to the overall stratergy. so hes quite right in calling it tactical and not very strategic.
This reviewer needs to open his mind a little.. Just because the game breaks with some RTS conventions, this does NOT mean its not a strategy game.. "The strategy is totally missing" - what is this dumbass talking about? The games campaign involves strategy HENCE it is a strategy game! You have RPG elements certainly, but you choose how to kit out your units, you use tactics in battle.. I remember when Dune 2 came out - the first "traditional" RTS but before that there WERE other strategy games!
@imtohotforu its different some my m8tes dont like it because u cannot build a base but u still tech ( lvl 1-3) and every unit lost really hurts you so u must use ability;s like there is no tomorrow and do more ambushes and teamwork then before ....i myself like both games equally because dow 2 is good in its own way and the last stand games u can play with 2 others all having only one commander who lvls up ( and he remains that after the game) getting better gear is just so addictive and fun
omg the whole warhammer series copy blizzard games, starcraft and warcraft, i hate playing it and i would never buy a rip off, i think ppl whoo create games should be original
@kabroniux Um, actually its the other way around. warhammer was a table top game from the late 80s. even bizzard admits that starcraft was heavily influenced by warhammer
I dont know i bought it today a nd playd for 2 hours i have to say its pretty god if though i was waiting for a rts its still very good the rpg elements make it more fun and brutaly action packed
hey just a message... DO NOT complain about tht u bawt the game and its crap cause u cant build buildings, neerly every peece of info tells u this, but in my opinion this is better than 1 and online is sikz
I l.ove the game. The campaign on harder difficulties is just insanely good. All about positioning. 1 wrong move and you lose. A right move and you will still be in for a fight, but its never EASY. Especially when bosses can 1 hit a squad :P
i really enjoyed the first wh 40k and i bought wh 40k 2 and i was quit disappointed , because choosing the commander on online campaign force you to using one strategy . ex. if you chose defense you cant change to offense during middle of game..and is no such thing as building the base or any structures(except if you chose defense that your commander can build defense structures) -missing the most . i didn't like it ,but this is only my opinion ,maybe if i will play more i will get use to it
i know this is a stupid question but can i run this game on my laptop? i can run warcraft 3 flawlessly or my pc which i run l4d just fine so can i play this?????? im sorry im new to pc gaming so heheh i need help
Its ment to be like this bc its ment to mimic the new tabletop game rules for seize and control and loot counter games, cant rip on relic for what GW did
I didnt really enjoy the campaign as much as I liked the skirmish mode. Skirmishes work really well and the new "there is only war" update improved the graphics and gave a load more maps too.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This game is really not for RTS fans... More of people that enjoy the "action rpg" games. No troop building etc etc. Pretty boring game. Played quite a bit of the campaign and that shit is so repetitive it gets boring. The multi-player is pathetic as well state by steveycommentmant. Nuff said game sucks if you take it from a RTS point of view.
looks a bit samey. im glad the reviewer was honest and said that it does get a bit repetetive. you have to look hard to find RTS' that dont though to be fair.
On the original 40k you build buildings but in the sequel, theres no base building except for one "headquarters" where your units come from. I played lots of RTS, and this new style is much more tactical.
You can create squads and customize and upgrade them on the field instead of buying the upgrades from buildings. You only have one building, an HQ that can be upgraded to get better troops anda defensive turret.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
this game is shit, its a cock up mix of dawn of war and company of heroes. the online mathmaking is so crap, i havnt yet played a game where i've been matched with someone less than 20 levels higher than me.
and the change from massive battles that were fun, to these crap battles that last about 10 seconds when theres no cover, and damn ages where there is, i really found thius game unplayable.
Yes you can you go to mulyiplayer and do a private match and you have to make the oppenents computer. I got this of someone else so it might not be true.
omg people stop complaining about the necrons. did dawn of war 1 of necrons when it first came out? no. relic isnt stupid they're gonna make an expansion.
people who are bitching about the loss of choas and the necrons. stop bitching. relic will throw out a bunch of patches or expansions. look at how much coh got. it got 2 expansions in...2 years. it is probobly making an expansion.
The campaign for DoW II is all the mroe realistic. It makes more sense, that troops are sent into the battle, rather than base building. But there is still strategy, about cover, and such. RPGs does not have such. Also Im tired of base building in campaigns. many people is, and Relic knew that.
Tbh, after buying this game yesterday i would have rather spent my £40 on condoms... , its nothing like the 1st one and is more like Killzone 2 on PSP, this Sucks EPICLLY ! Relic killed it when they brought our Crusade and Soulstorm.
it good to start with for me, but after 5 minutes, this became my choice for the worst game ever. gamespot has never tried the wonders that is Soulstorm and Dark Crusade. Relic, fuck you for ruining your best franchise.
Dark Crusade I agree but Soulstorm killed Dawn of War so bad that even the producers said it was a big mistake! Dawn Of War 2 however is a worthy sequel and is on the same level as the first dawn of war! We only have to wait for a Dark Crusade (that was the moment DOW got maximum scores and popularity) style expansion and this game is gonna own!
DoW 2 multiplayer impressed me by its originality incompare to the 1st DoW, but the one thing whichi hated was - that there are only 4 races to choose... well it may be good to overall balance the game, but it sucks after u allready played DoW1, atleast they could have add a chaos space marines.....(could have make it the same as SM but with diffrent models voices and some units(like terminators to oblitorators))
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Dawn of War Soulstorm is better overall. While the base game is imbalanced and has some bugs, there are patches and mods to blance everything out and make it into a great game.
There is even a Tyranid mod out there that has as good, if not better looking models than the ones in DoW II. Combine them with the games already existing armies (Imperial guard, Orks, marines, chaos, eldar, dark eldar, tau, necrons, and sisters of battle) there are also many other units available that you can add.
We play Soulstorm for the multiplayer. I will admit that the campaign was lacking for single player, but for multiplayer there are like 20 different victory objectives now.
One of my favorite ones is Assassinate. You want to use your commander because it is a powerful unit, but if he dies, you lose, so you have to be careful.
Take and hold is a lot of fun too in an 8 player game :)
i does not work on my computer but soulstorm looks soo much better :( i have dow 1 winter assault dark crusade and soulstorm and 2 but it doesnt work coz of my graphics card any 1 interested in buying it it is still brand new and i promise i have uninstalled it
That's... really bizarre... to have single-player mode like that.
I guess they had to remove all the playable races to keep it simple, diverse, and graphics awesome. Still, I think they should have kept Tau; they're different enough from the other races to maintain the essence of a completely different race.
I loved the campagin, still doing it now to be honest. Its kick ass, pimping out your guys in an RPG style, then being able to see them reek havoc in an RTS. Multiplayer is cool too, but online you always get a lagger that ruins it.
u know that starcraft was originally planned as a wh40k game and that they just changed the name cuze of license problems ? ... so the models in starcraft are all taken from warhammer and not starcraft
I've not played this game yet, but to me it looks brilliant. I take it positively, that it is more of an action rpg. Sometimes, i hate multiplayer RTS where you build and rush your troops which is completely senseless. This is more of a tactical game. And it really keeps the action alive. Cheers! :)
doesnt seam like a bad game. now i'v seen a review I might get this game this week by watching a review think I give it a 7/10 ill change my mind when I get to play the game.
i love this game but one thing i will say, for a chapter that has an apparently high number of psychers there is an mysterious lack of librarians in the game.
I loved DoW. Zerging people with Fast attack orcs and just tearing shit up on the battlefield was awesome, but I'm not so sure I would like they new combat that DoW 2 has to offer. What do you guys think?
This game made it so you actually needed to use strategy and tactics, maneuvering your troops, managing equipment, picking battles, finding which tool you have that's best for the issue at hand. In conventional RTS, you just build your base faster then your opponent and gobble up resources to over power people.
wikieditspam 1 month ago
Honest review! any and the bp movies are just idiots
Timx4 1 month ago
play it on the hardest difficulty and you wont be asking why there's no strategy.
godmathias 3 months ago
@godmathias Me thinks he was playing it on easy :P
FatfighterXD1 3 months ago
the originals like dark crusade and soul storm were better imo
Darkseeker109 3 months ago
someone please tell me i would like this game i love cnc series and star craft 2 so a quick response is needed steam sale is going to disappear soon
BlackAus07 5 months ago
The offline is not a bad idea. I think its a step in a interesting way that could make more awsome games in the future
kristiansollien 7 months ago
world of warcraft
TheTruthOfLies 7 months ago
If I had a dollar (an Australian dollar mind you, as it's now worth more than the USD :P) every time I watched that CGI trailer and wondered why they haven't made a blockbuster movie out of Warhammer 40K...or at least an FPS (like 'fire warrior' but better) I suppose it stops the franchise slipping into mainstream valley and never being able to get back out again.
TheToscaboy 8 months ago
@TheToscaboy they're making a TPS called space marine and it's coming out in september
Lorddavian0 7 months ago
@TheToscaboy they are making 40k space marine
01misheel 7 months ago
i say Dawn of war one including all the expansions with it is the mutha fukin bomb
Spazzosity 10 months ago
This game is a 1:1 Copy from Company of Heroes without Base Building...
Keylen 10 months ago
well the review just sucks. the game is just great
xXugotown3dxX 11 months ago
Dunno why ppl whine about base building. DOW 1 + expansions did that well but this is a great game that compliments the first.
ARX78 11 months ago
Lol this guy probably played through the campaign on easy. No strategy? Pfft, pick a difficulty where you actually have to think and plan your approach and can't get away with steam rolling everything, and good luck to you my friend.
Although I do agree with him on the multiplayer, it's what makes the experience worth the money. THE CRAFTWORLD IS OUR HOME AND WE ARE HER GUARDIANS!
TheClubbman 11 months ago
When you put a half assed rpg with a now half assed rts. It doesn't make the game good;and the last game was so good !
TheGreatDecius 11 months ago
Well, looks like the folks at Gamespot have been smoking crack again.
TANSKBD 1 year ago
so the campaign is tactical yet not strategic? I know for a fact that clicking all your units as one group around the campaign will not work, its all about cover, positioning, and abilities. This reviewer fails to realize what strategy really means.
popcornpopper2 1 year ago
@popcornpopper2 Stratergic is what your overall plan is, say.... get insane income and just overwhelm your enemies with lots of stuff. or rush somthing dangerous and try to finish it within 7min. tactics are however Cover positioning and abilties, I.E. the tricks you use to give you the edge in a battle but wont really matter to the overall stratergy. so hes quite right in calling it tactical and not very strategic.
Drar12345 11 months ago
This reviewer needs to open his mind a little.. Just because the game breaks with some RTS conventions, this does NOT mean its not a strategy game.. "The strategy is totally missing" - what is this dumbass talking about? The games campaign involves strategy HENCE it is a strategy game! You have RPG elements certainly, but you choose how to kit out your units, you use tactics in battle.. I remember when Dune 2 came out - the first "traditional" RTS but before that there WERE other strategy games!
andy7666 1 year ago 10
@andy7666 you cant spell ignorance without ign or say gamespot without saying gay.
thats why machinima is better.
theevil090 2 months ago
starcraft II 400% better then this shit
Gorissh 1 year ago
@Gorissh have you ever played dawn of war 1 + the other expansions? 100 million times better than dawn of war 2
Spazzosity 10 months ago
@Gorissh if you like Starcraft then why don't you go wase your time with it and let the pros play dawn of war. Fanboy
ArgoTheCat97 9 months ago
@ArgoTheCat97 No offence, but you're a fanboy as well. Let me quote you: "And let the pros play dawn of war".
Just to let you know.
MrRallemulle 9 months ago
I wanna see them fight Eliphas on primarch. Since there is obviously no "strategy" :/
GamingTheGuy 1 year ago
the ' identity crisis ' is the best part of the game
JazztheNorrisman 1 year ago
I liked both the campaign and multiplayer in the game
Gigantron6 1 year ago
lengthy campaign? IGN said it was too sort... which one is it?!?
bradogold 1 year ago
@bradogold i think its lengthly
lukethedukea380 1 year ago
The story in chaos rising is amazing, I agree the original can get a little boring, but chaos rising makes up for that :D
ibloxProductionz 1 year ago
@ibloxProductionz but its pretty short but epic and they balanced out some of your charaters like the jetpack guy wich sucked in dow 2
dushikorsou1 1 year ago
@dushikorsou1 Nah he was good in original dow2 if u gave him the right stats and stuff
ibloxProductionz 1 year ago
Meh, Dark Crusade is the best DoW game ever.
worldtaker999 1 year ago
i really want this it sounds better then the other dows but this no base building sounds weird is it or do you get used to it?
imtohotforu 1 year ago
@imtohotforu its different some my m8tes dont like it because u cannot build a base but u still tech ( lvl 1-3) and every unit lost really hurts you so u must use ability;s like there is no tomorrow and do more ambushes and teamwork then before ....i myself like both games equally because dow 2 is good in its own way and the last stand games u can play with 2 others all having only one commander who lvls up ( and he remains that after the game) getting better gear is just so addictive and fun
darkbozo11 1 year ago
@imtohotforu u get very used to it
its pure glorious combat! :D
lukethedukea380 1 year ago
omg the whole warhammer series copy blizzard games, starcraft and warcraft, i hate playing it and i would never buy a rip off, i think ppl whoo create games should be original
kabroniux 1 year ago
@kabroniux - the F man, tell me in what way does this copy Blizzard's game?
XxMusashiYamatoxX 1 year ago 2
@kabroniux Um, actually its the other way around. warhammer was a table top game from the late 80s. even bizzard admits that starcraft was heavily influenced by warhammer
mr8ucket 1 year ago 2
@kabroniux You are to stupid to leave a comment. Sorry.
TemplarOfNight 1 year ago
@kabroniux to bad warhammer is like 20 years old....
AidanXD10 11 months ago
STARCRAFT BROODWAR!!
OhWhatIsItNow 1 year ago
GAMES SPOT IS BRUTAL NOW IT PISSES ME OFF
TheRealThang88 1 year ago
but thats the point, they tried to make the SP more like an action RPG more than an RTS, it was made like that.
chriscos123 1 year ago
I dont know i bought it today a nd playd for 2 hours i have to say its pretty god if though i was waiting for a rts its still very good the rpg elements make it more fun and brutaly action packed
ScrewDriver609 1 year ago
action rpg is sweet
landcruiserlarry 1 year ago
rofl the reviewer sounds like some sort of bitchy girl when he says " mostly " and btw the singleplayer is awesome.....
Agocforthewin 1 year ago
of course a game has had better sound... actually the game which gave the Engine to make this one, idiot. Company of heroes???
Choppr777 1 year ago
@Choppr777 actually, company of heroes is based on the first dawn of war engine.
Doowoo 1 year ago
hey just a message... DO NOT complain about tht u bawt the game and its crap cause u cant build buildings, neerly every peece of info tells u this, but in my opinion this is better than 1 and online is sikz
greyknight95 1 year ago
I l.ove the game. The campaign on harder difficulties is just insanely good. All about positioning. 1 wrong move and you lose. A right move and you will still be in for a fight, but its never EASY. Especially when bosses can 1 hit a squad :P
Rincewindlolzor 1 year ago
is it only multiplayer and campaign? cuz sometimes i like playing a skrimish for the fun of it.
samwarp8 2 years ago
there also are skirmishes (with bots in the online mode)
1hermans1 2 years ago
realism is a good thing
CrazedHamster99 2 years ago
this guys voice really pisses me off. Everytime he starts a sentence it sounds like he's going to end the review.
TheBPMovies 2 years ago 18
well i actually know the review it's not going to end until it reaches the 6:21 on the slider.
theBeorn 2 years ago
@TheBPMovies Agreed
D00ml0rdKazzak 6 months ago
@TheBPMovies hahaha yup, super annoying.
godmathias 3 months ago
is dawn of war 2 really worth getting? i might gert a vista for Christmas and i was wondering if i should get this game. so is it any good?
Mar1neperson 2 years ago
i really enjoyed the first wh 40k and i bought wh 40k 2 and i was quit disappointed , because choosing the commander on online campaign force you to using one strategy . ex. if you chose defense you cant change to offense during middle of game..and is no such thing as building the base or any structures(except if you chose defense that your commander can build defense structures) -missing the most . i didn't like it ,but this is only my opinion ,maybe if i will play more i will get use to it
LeLans01 2 years ago
the original is better but still they are so different they will be wrong to compare...
yaku3 2 years ago
i had the game but it busted my vid card and my comp I need to pay 330$ just to fix the comp ( 130$ for the vid card) X_X i will never forget that
starwars000000000001 2 years ago
Look's more like Chaos Gate 2 that Down of War 2.
kingsman565 2 years ago
BLood ravens again.... why not space wolfs :D
Marlik48 2 years ago
Gotta agree with this guy. Single Player Campaign is boring, but multiplayer is one of the best things i've ever played.
Elintasokas 2 years ago
i know this is a stupid question but can i run this game on my laptop? i can run warcraft 3 flawlessly or my pc which i run l4d just fine so can i play this?????? im sorry im new to pc gaming so heheh i need help
money272 2 years ago
at low standards maybe all depending on how new your laptop is.
wfcxtoxic 2 years ago
if l4d's fine.MAYBe u can run this
GtaFreakZ 2 years ago
well as warcraft 3 is 7 years old running that flawlessly isnt very impressive:P
Agocforthewin 1 year ago
definitely just build your own pc it's cheaper, it's easy and your options are limitless.
esca8652 2 years ago
building your own pc is best
Lodgeinator 2 years ago
yes sir
Ghaz013 2 years ago
wats the best computer to use for this game ( dell, compaq, sony , toshiba, intel, mac ?)
petrovik 2 years ago
Def not Mac, Dell, or Gateway in my opinion. HP, Asus, and Sony I don't think are bad. I've had great experience with HP.
ESLOS3 2 years ago
@petrovik sony and dell.
BladeOfParthia 1 year ago
i believe first part was much more interesting. Dow2 feels like a simple boom-crash show without a bit of strategy substance
Vectornyi 2 years ago
Dawn of War is tactical (not strategic) as hell...
lapsk4us 2 years ago
Its ment to be like this bc its ment to mimic the new tabletop game rules for seize and control and loot counter games, cant rip on relic for what GW did
kevinmcd28 2 years ago
You cant have 40k without Chaos imo...and you have to play the tabletop game to fully understand it, o and read some of the 40k books too =)
ObsessedPig 2 years ago
Comment removed
ObsessedPig 2 years ago
get the DOW soustorm tyrannid mod and bam! there you go. 5 more races than this game
wyanokerebels 2 years ago
I didnt really enjoy the campaign as much as I liked the skirmish mode. Skirmishes work really well and the new "there is only war" update improved the graphics and gave a load more maps too.
ARX78 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This game is really not for RTS fans... More of people that enjoy the "action rpg" games. No troop building etc etc. Pretty boring game. Played quite a bit of the campaign and that shit is so repetitive it gets boring. The multi-player is pathetic as well state by steveycommentmant. Nuff said game sucks if you take it from a RTS point of view.
shaggyscoots 2 years ago
then play the ones you like, don't hate
TheToXic111 2 years ago 22
@TheToXic111 then he will play nothing
markos64207 1 year ago
looks a bit samey. im glad the reviewer was honest and said that it does get a bit repetetive. you have to look hard to find RTS' that dont though to be fair.
Vexx560 2 years ago
Original Dawn of wars were fun, i never found it repetitive
LDreamerDude 2 years ago
do u build buildings so u can make squads like the otr 40k games ? plz reply tty
crazycon111 2 years ago
nope you deploy units in a pod tihingy ;D
wienieman151 2 years ago
On the original 40k you build buildings but in the sequel, theres no base building except for one "headquarters" where your units come from. I played lots of RTS, and this new style is much more tactical.
Riseonix 2 years ago 2
You can create squads and customize and upgrade them on the field instead of buying the upgrades from buildings. You only have one building, an HQ that can be upgraded to get better troops anda defensive turret.
EBTcraft15 2 years ago
the campaign things is kinda weird...but its a good mix up of things, in my opinion. the W4K storylline still kicks massive ass :]
YokoKawashima 2 years ago
Audio is awesome.
FOR THE EMPEROR!!!!
RedClownKnight 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this game is shit, its a cock up mix of dawn of war and company of heroes. the online mathmaking is so crap, i havnt yet played a game where i've been matched with someone less than 20 levels higher than me.
and the change from massive battles that were fun, to these crap battles that last about 10 seconds when theres no cover, and damn ages where there is, i really found thius game unplayable.
steveycommentman 2 years ago
So, you can't do a skirmish?
Finniej 2 years ago
Yes you can you go to mulyiplayer and do a private match and you have to make the oppenents computer. I got this of someone else so it might not be true.
(Got the game but i need a new graphics card)
TheCrazyBrad1 2 years ago
of course you can skirmish.
Riseonix 2 years ago
so like..i haven't played an rts since aoe2 and i'm eager into playin smthg modern, so my question is, is this worth buying?
ph1lk 2 years ago
omg people stop complaining about the necrons. did dawn of war 1 of necrons when it first came out? no. relic isnt stupid they're gonna make an expansion.
BlackDeath1423 2 years ago 4
people who are bitching about the loss of choas and the necrons. stop bitching. relic will throw out a bunch of patches or expansions. look at how much coh got. it got 2 expansions in...2 years. it is probobly making an expansion.
ARomanianKid14 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Once I get a new computer I dont know if I should buy this game it looks weird compared to Dawn of War 1 and there are no necrons.
rabbidpolarbear 2 years ago
nar dude get it it kicks ass
PointyCheese 2 years ago 2
i really liked the tau: they had guns for 1 class and hand-to-hand for another, and plus, they were rigged
mdidion777 2 years ago 5
No Necrons, no point in buying that game.
Cadriansoul 2 years ago
man i am necron guy too, but that wont stop me from getting it. its fun as shit, even if you dont have the badassery from the necrons.
ARomanianKid14 2 years ago
nicht kaufen!!!
einfach nur scheisse das spiel,sowohl einzel als auch mehrspieler!!!!
woswasssssssssssssss 2 years ago
Notice that one in two people on this video in multiplayer is playing 'nids.
JamaiusYan 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. they got rid of chaos
2. they screwed up the campaign
3. they got rid of chaos
4. they should have just made another expantion pack
5. they got rid of all the expansion pack races and chaos
Metanator 2 years ago
I suggest you watch the IGN review because this review does not explain why it has ' an identity crisis'
OriginAndAbsolution 2 years ago
yes it does; the campaign plays like an RPG while the skirmishes and multiplayer play like an RTS. It's pretty obvious.
Ravenhart1 2 years ago
The campaign for DoW II is all the mroe realistic. It makes more sense, that troops are sent into the battle, rather than base building. But there is still strategy, about cover, and such. RPGs does not have such. Also Im tired of base building in campaigns. many people is, and Relic knew that.
segmemtum 2 years ago 3
i have this game and its very cool all buying it!!!!!
06bounty 2 years ago
im gana buy this game
xXmoviemadnezz 2 years ago
at 1:33 is that the same voice actor for wolverine in xml and mua games?
NeroAlan 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Tbh, after buying this game yesterday i would have rather spent my £40 on condoms... , its nothing like the 1st one and is more like Killzone 2 on PSP, this Sucks EPICLLY ! Relic killed it when they brought our Crusade and Soulstorm.
HubbaBubbaOo 2 years ago
you must of just played the campaging go play multi player it's nothing like the campaging or play skirmish
starwars000000000001 2 years ago
Chaos has terminators too lol.
kewldudexxx5 2 years ago
Well they will probably make expansion packs just like they did for the original DOW. And remember DOW 1 only had four races to start with too.
LatinoHeat2007 2 years ago 3
it good to start with for me, but after 5 minutes, this became my choice for the worst game ever. gamespot has never tried the wonders that is Soulstorm and Dark Crusade. Relic, fuck you for ruining your best franchise.
AKSsasori 2 years ago
Dark Crusade I agree but Soulstorm killed Dawn of War so bad that even the producers said it was a big mistake! Dawn Of War 2 however is a worthy sequel and is on the same level as the first dawn of war! We only have to wait for a Dark Crusade (that was the moment DOW got maximum scores and popularity) style expansion and this game is gonna own!
EBTcraft15 2 years ago 2
SAME producer that make the Game Company of heros..RELIC!!
ayaybla 2 years ago
DoW 2 multiplayer impressed me by its originality incompare to the 1st DoW, but the one thing whichi hated was - that there are only 4 races to choose... well it may be good to overall balance the game, but it sucks after u allready played DoW1, atleast they could have add a chaos space marines.....(could have make it the same as SM but with diffrent models voices and some units(like terminators to oblitorators))
VelikiyKrestonosez 2 years ago
only the expansions had more than 4 races the first DoW only had 4 races
OriginAndAbsolution 2 years ago 6
Somehow i hav'nt saw the "amazing story" in DOW soulstorm....since you can only see it at main bases maps and the begining...rest is random as HELL
thegreatjojo1 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dawn of War Soulstorm is better overall. While the base game is imbalanced and has some bugs, there are patches and mods to blance everything out and make it into a great game.
There is even a Tyranid mod out there that has as good, if not better looking models than the ones in DoW II. Combine them with the games already existing armies (Imperial guard, Orks, marines, chaos, eldar, dark eldar, tau, necrons, and sisters of battle) there are also many other units available that you can add.
Trueflights 2 years ago
It depends,i've played soulstorm and this,DOW2 is more RPGish and tactical....soulstorm is just wild randomness and same objective every mission
thegreatjojo1 2 years ago 9
We play Soulstorm for the multiplayer. I will admit that the campaign was lacking for single player, but for multiplayer there are like 20 different victory objectives now.
One of my favorite ones is Assassinate. You want to use your commander because it is a powerful unit, but if he dies, you lose, so you have to be careful.
Take and hold is a lot of fun too in an 8 player game :)
Trueflights 2 years ago
@thegreatjojo1 Wow, someone has the same opinion as me!
ibloxProductionz 1 year ago
Any word on what the expansions for this will bring?
Phobotech 2 years ago
oc only
johnchen0213 2 years ago
this is company of heroes with aliens
Mikelp79 2 years ago 4
so true cept coh has basebuilding
TheGreatOrdo 2 years ago
the old dows are better
YaCkybear110 2 years ago
i does not work on my computer but soulstorm looks soo much better :( i have dow 1 winter assault dark crusade and soulstorm and 2 but it doesnt work coz of my graphics card any 1 interested in buying it it is still brand new and i promise i have uninstalled it
YaCkybear110 2 years ago
That's... really bizarre... to have single-player mode like that.
I guess they had to remove all the playable races to keep it simple, diverse, and graphics awesome. Still, I think they should have kept Tau; they're different enough from the other races to maintain the essence of a completely different race.
ColonelMarksman 2 years ago 4
tau did not come in dow1 they came in
DC 2 years after dow1 was realease so tau will be in a dow2 expansion soon i hope deamon hunters will be in a future expansion
starwars000000000001 2 years ago
DOW2 expansion?..gah..why waste money so soon
cutiepe2ce 2 years ago
it worth it like DC
starwars000000000001 2 years ago
The first expansion brings Chaos Back. Hence the name, Chaos Rising.
df2fanatic 2 years ago
I loved the campagin, still doing it now to be honest. Its kick ass, pimping out your guys in an RPG style, then being able to see them reek havoc in an RTS. Multiplayer is cool too, but online you always get a lagger that ruins it.
StrikingShadow1 2 years ago
Well they just came out with the patch so it will be better now and another is already on the way :)
Itoby2 2 years ago
Ahhhhh man! I so want this game...why did I first start to look into it on easter sunday when everything is closed?
IT WILL BE MINE!
FuriousGeorge1985 2 years ago
Buy it from Steam =).
pplzperson 2 years ago
Trust me I would love to :( I love my Steam. But alas i'm just a dude with a pre-paid credit card with no money on it.
Ah well...all the stores are open today again so i'm omw to pick it up!
WOO!
FuriousGeorge1985 2 years ago
i play this game 24/7 its so i take my space marines and go and jump and squash ppl and make the orcs look small :)
butchm16 2 years ago
basically, blizzard stole some ideas from warhammer40k and make it better
drakeking94 2 years ago
i am soooooo getting this game, its like a two in one pakage an rts and a rpg!?
one question do you have veicles? pls respond
lukethedukea380 2 years ago
yea you get a few vehicles like tanks and dreadnoughts, except for tyranids they don't have vehicles
werewolf9205 2 years ago
Not really... their units are so over powering that some count as tanks.
tsukune12 2 years ago
Im sticking to CoH, DoW2 looks different, it reminds me Tiberium Wars but with better character modelings...
JVlaSSaCrE 2 years ago
i have a xps with a 256mb nvidia geforce graphics card and i have to play with graphics settings on low and the game is still extremely laggy for me.
ridecapita 2 years ago
Starcraft copied warhammer 40k because 40k is 25 years old.
MKOWHEAD 2 years ago 3
I don't think 40k is 25 years old. Warhammer Fantasy turned 25 last year, but I think 40k is a bit younger.
TabletopWargaming 2 years ago
40k is 22 years old.
billyboyjennings 2 years ago 15
@billyboyjennings and may it live for another 22, been with it since rogue trader, just rules!
irishrebelalert 1 year ago
Does this game require an amazing good graphics card, or will a Nvidia GeForce 8400 GT be ok?
matt4311 2 years ago
i play this game on medium with 8400 GT, 3 ghz cpu and 3 gbs memory. I only lag when there are explosions.
LAlaallalala 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
starcraft ripoff
lazomaniac 2 years ago
You do know 40k came out years before starcraft right?
ceafexftw 2 years ago
yes.starcraft es mejor
Edwin892 2 years ago
u know that starcraft was originally planned as a wh40k game and that they just changed the name cuze of license problems ? ... so the models in starcraft are all taken from warhammer and not starcraft
DerMitDemBlunt 2 years ago 3
Starcraft ripoff? Nah. Warhammer 40k is over 25 years old. More like the other way around :)
sausage206 2 years ago 3
This is like company of heroes.
blahblahgdp 2 years ago
Made by Relic same as COH ;)
karreltje1 2 years ago
yer same poeple made it i think but they decided to go for something simlar to the table top game
wotsup1000 2 years ago
I've not played this game yet, but to me it looks brilliant. I take it positively, that it is more of an action rpg. Sometimes, i hate multiplayer RTS where you build and rush your troops which is completely senseless. This is more of a tactical game. And it really keeps the action alive. Cheers! :)
legacy1992 2 years ago 2
i loved the end.
"aw nuts to yas!"
"engaging at range"
"aaarrgghhh!"
054martinm 2 years ago
I don't why the reviewer was bitching about the story....it seemed good to me
steelgear 2 years ago 3
What I like about this game is the fluid combat, none of this base building bullshit or edging up to the fight, its always on the ball.
Very well put together game 5/5 from me.
cactapus69 2 years ago
doesnt seam like a bad game. now i'v seen a review I might get this game this week by watching a review think I give it a 7/10 ill change my mind when I get to play the game.
Sedgie007 2 years ago
Action RPGs are games like you control one, Dungeon Siege for example
NationOfMasturbation 2 years ago
i love this game but one thing i will say, for a chapter that has an apparently high number of psychers there is an mysterious lack of librarians in the game.
killerguildmonk77 2 years ago 2
warhammer 40k dawn of war 2 is a strategy rpg, hasn't anyone played battlefront or something..?
NationOfMasturbation 2 years ago
its an RTS with the gameplay styles of an action RPG
cactapus69 2 years ago
that's called RTSRPG (Real Time Strategy Role Playing Game), or just simply Strategy RPG
NationOfMasturbation 2 years ago
i play on insane...
MperorM 2 years ago
I loved DoW. Zerging people with Fast attack orcs and just tearing shit up on the battlefield was awesome, but I'm not so sure I would like they new combat that DoW 2 has to offer. What do you guys think?
CriMSWoW 2 years ago